Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Rany on the Royals

"Game of the Year."

27 Comments -

1 – 27 of 27
Anonymous Curtis said...

I thought it was right to stick with Olivo for the at bat because he was still juicing on the adrenaline from the collision at the plate in the fifth. That play was like spinach to Popeye.

If we can follow this up with Meche and Greinke working their magic the next couple of days, we really could start the Indians' fire sale. What would we have to give up to get Cliff Lee? We really could use a good left-handed starter.

May 20, 2009 at 3:28 PM

Blogger Phil said...

Such a great game (er, inning). It seems as though those intangibles we kept hearing about (and dismissing) from guys like Crisp and Bloomquist are paying off. I can't count the number of quotes from Royals players who credit an ever-present optimism in the clubhouse that was never there before.

Also, can we please not call it the Kougar. Please?

Please?

May 20, 2009 at 3:28 PM

Blogger rilesKC said...

Yes, no more of that Kougar nonsense. That is not good for anybody.

May 20, 2009 at 3:42 PM

Blogger jello said...

I think (and thought last night as soon as I figured out who was up) that this is the perfect situation for the Spork. Going through the roster, I can't think of anybody else I would want at the plate in that situation. I does not justify giving him 400 at bats over the course of the season, but, I kneew he was going to get that runner in.

JeffO

May 20, 2009 at 3:47 PM

Anonymous Mark LaFlamme said...

Beautiful. I love that there was a sizeable crowd still there to get excited when it all came together. If that was Fenway? Crickets chirping.
Say what you will about Jacobs and his ill-timed homeruns, few get as excited as he does when the Royals rally. Dig that spirit. How the hell he keeps the chaw in his mouth is beyond me.

May 20, 2009 at 3:52 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know, jello. You ask me a question that starts "which Royal do you want up when ...." and almost all of them finish with the answer Billy Butler.

The ship has sailed on Kougar, fellas, whether you like it or not. Whining about it now just makes you look like Norm Coleman or Grandpa Simpson.

May 20, 2009 at 3:57 PM

Blogger rilesKC said...

We know the ship has sailed on the Kougar. That is what we are trying to tell you. No one needs to embarrass themselves further by pushing that ridiculous nickname.

May 20, 2009 at 4:02 PM

Blogger Ryan said...

Beating the Royals at home is as difficult as climbing K2.

May 20, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

In regards to attendance - last night was a T-Shirt Tuesdays, which are always an extra draw. But it wasn't the t-shirts that made everyone stay until the end - I think the team can take full credit for giving the fans enough hope to make it worth it to stay through the 9th, even when we're down 5-2.

May 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM

Anonymous AxDxMx said...

To be fair, the 25,000 were probably there for the George Brett t-shirt giveaway.

May 20, 2009 at 10:03 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lots and lots of just plain bad baseball tonight. Dropped balls, missed cutoffs, dropped balls, poorly executed rundowns, dropped balls, horrible relief pitching, dropped balls, Sidney Ponson, dropped balls, Jamey Wright and dropped balls. Yuck!

May 20, 2009 at 11:20 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Apologies for a new topic.

I am a boomer, who came of age in the late sixties. We generated the Free Speech movement, feminism and equal rights, among other revolutions. I am proud of that. Justice triumphed over repression.

But revolutions have unintended consequences. The brawl at the K earlier this week manifests the flip side of the revolution, our loss of consideration of others, of self-control, of decorum, of what I can only quaintly refer to as manners. I especially feel for those parents who were there with their children that night.

I look at black and white photos from the 1940/50s of men at the ballpark in suits, neckties, and fedoras, and women in dresses and hats, and, happy that we have thrown off repression, I still feel pangs of envy. Many of them cheered for #42.

Sorry, guys, but I could not think of a better place to let off some steam. I still want to cheer "Go Royals," but after all it's just a ball game.

May 20, 2009 at 11:23 PM

Anonymous Casper said...

Kougar...God, that's just a stupid name. It was blasted by the write-in public on Ball Star, and it's off to a blasting here (so far). The name sucks, so please - LET. IT. GO.

I'm sorry, I had to get that off my chest. As for the 9th last night, I will sheepishly raise my hand to Rany's question regarding who among us thought that Jacobs always seems to hit meaningless bombs in the 9th. Eerily enough, I also thought that Olivo would flail and bail on the slider.

Get out of my head, Rany. It's freaking me out.

May 21, 2009 at 12:42 AM

Anonymous Casper said...

For all you Greinke freaks, make sure you get yours June 16. I'm sure one size will fit(-ish) all.

http://sports.yahoo.com/fantasy/blog/roto_arcade/post/Zack-Greinke-and-the-trading-block?urn=fantasy,164636

May 21, 2009 at 12:46 AM

Anonymous Curtis said...

The point about Olivo taking the first pitch was made all the more poignant with Teahen's approach last night in the ninth inning.

Wood has walked three of the four batters he faced, and the only one he hadn't walked was Butler who had flied out on a 2-0 pitch.

If there ever were a time to take a strike, this might well have been the time.

You have to tip your cap to some extent to the stones of Wood and Stoppach for calling for the slider with the first pitch.

What was so frustrating from my perspective was that even if it was a fastball, it was going to be high in the strikezone and on the inside corner, hardly the kind of pitch that he could be confident of driving into the outfield to at least tie the game.

Now, I didn't play past high school, and I have no idea what it is like to stand in against a guy throwing 97. My problem is not so much with the execution as with the mindset. I don't understand how he could be swinging at all at the first pitch, and the fact that it would have been a ball only makes it worse.

What a frustrating end to the game.

May 21, 2009 at 8:43 AM

Anonymous Sneaky Pete said...

Having been at the Harvey game in 2003 and the game Tuesday night, I have to give the Harvey game a slight edge in the "fan pandemonium" category.

May 21, 2009 at 8:51 AM

Blogger Nick said...

now we know why we have to wait 20 minutes before seeing our dentist even when we show up on time. nice!

May 21, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

anyone see the guy in Rivals fall out of his chair before the 5th inning? Wish I had a video and Lefebvre's reaction. It was priceless.

May 21, 2009 at 11:45 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mark LaFlamme "Beautiful. I love that there was a sizeable crowd still there to get excited when it all came together. If that was Fenway? Crickets chirping."

I'm a die-hard Royals fan living in Boston (for 12 years now), and I have to ask...have you ever been to Fenway? The fans there are fantastic...they show up early and stay until the end and they have a record "480+ and still counting" home game sell-out streak (since May 15, 2003). These fans BELIEVE the team will win.

I'm glad the Royals fans are getting into the spirit, but I had to defend Red Sox Nation (much to my chagrin...), they aren't always the most pleasant to be around, but they are most definitely FANS.

-SenoJ-

May 21, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
anyone see the guy in Rivals fall out of his chair before the 5th inning? Wish I had a video and Lefebvre's reaction. It was priceless.

Guaranteed that 'gentleman' refers to the stadium as the kougar

May 21, 2009 at 1:48 PM

Blogger gbewing said...

as great as that win was -the following losses just wiped it all out- bad baseball all around

May 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM

Blogger aerobica said...

I am glad the Royals used the 9th inning comeback as a springboard into the Cardinals series... guh.

May 22, 2009 at 6:17 AM

Blogger Shelby said...

the Royals are, unfortunately, still the Royals.

i see this team sliding off into 3rd or 4th place soon. very soon.

this is all an(other) illusion.

May 22, 2009 at 11:04 AM

Anonymous Chance said...

As I have said many times here, I am a Detroit Tigers fan living in KC for the past 17 years. I root for the Royals, because, well, for so many years both teams sucked and it was like being at the bar at closing time, choosing between the fat girl and the drunk psycho with the yellow teeth and vomit on her halter top. Either way, you are going to be disappointed at the end of the encounter.

The point is, I have never had to deal with both teams being good at the same time. What do I do this year? Which hat and jersey do I wear to the ballpark next week? I guess my question is, which team has more staying power and therefore is worthy of my affection?

May 22, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Anonymous Eric said...

Don't worry, Chance, no dilemna --- the Royals are not good. As a matter of fact, they're a Zack Greinke away from being a woefully bad, bottom of the division team. Might be there soon, even with Zack. Their brand of baseball is HORRIBLE. The baserunning is terrible. The fielding is pathetic. The hitting pretty much sucks. The bullpen...well, Sidney Ponson and Horacio Ramirez are apparently the setup men. And contrary to what George Brett thinks, Hillman is over his head, yet too arrogant to know it.

Sorry, but it's hard for me to get excited about a team that plays so ugly, and has already lost Meche-Greinke games, back-to-back....twice.

May 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM

Anonymous Casper said...

My God - Yadier Molina stole on us! THE CATCHER IS RUNNING ON US FOR PETE'S SAKE!

May 23, 2009 at 3:50 PM

Anonymous Carl Willingham said...

Eric, I couldn't have said it better myself. Bad baseball, not a power team, not fast, not good defensively, not good at the little things, pretty much a Grienke away from....I'm glad they got the last 4 Meche starts instead of DLing him and getting him right. That's thinking long term, not..

May 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.