Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Rany on the Royals

"25 To Watch: Part One."

16 Comments -

1 – 16 of 16
Blogger kehrsam said...

Im a bit surprised that lil' Tony made the top half of the list

April 4, 2009 at 3:22 PM

Anonymous Dave said...

Check out what Rotoworld has to say about our Royals under their Off-season Winners column:

"This struggling franchise finally did something right this offseason. Trading only Leo Nunez and Ramon Ramirez, the Royals were able to land a reliable centerfielder, Coco Crisp, and a power hitting first baseman, Mike Jacobs. The Royals promptly replaced Nunez and Ramirez with free agents Kyle Farnsworth, Juan Cruz, Horacio Ramirez, and Doug Waechter. Then Kansas City added minor league free agents to provide depth should injuries strike during the season. With these additions, Alex Gordon's new swing, Billy Butler's bat, and Zach Greinke's new long deal, Kansas City could compete in a weak AL Central."

Obviously our minor league depth has turned into part of our starting rotation....but still, some of you pessimistic Royals fans need to give this off-season a chance and get fired up for a fun summer.

April 4, 2009 at 5:35 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

I'm sorry Dave but when this team puts Pena on the roster when he should have been gone before the end of last year, I have trouble getting too pumped up. We have more weaknesses than you think. Granted if a large number of things work, we could be good, but that would require an awful lot.

April 4, 2009 at 7:11 PM

Anonymous Justin Andrew Anderson said...

Fellow Royals Fans: Thanks for standing alongside me in supporting of our beloved team! It hasn’t been easy having last made the playoffs in 1985 and watching every team but Expos/Nationals reach them since, failing to finish even 2nd in our division since 1995 and only enduring one winning season in 14 years. Our time will eventually come – I hope. Cheers to hoping we erase all this in 2009!

April 4, 2009 at 8:00 PM

Anonymous jackie ballgame said...

I've been thinking since October, 2008 that there are two either-or scenarios the Royals must have in order to be competitive in 09:

Either Hochevar or Davies must break out on the pitching side,

and

Either Gordon or Butler must break out on the offensive side.

I'd like to amend this a tad:

Either Hochevar or Davies must break out and the other one must be above average,

and

Two of Gordon, Butler, or Aviles need to be very good.

These are our young players with projectable upside. Aviles simply repeating what he did last year or come close seems about as likely and would have the same impact as a genuine breakout from Gordon or Butler.

Adding a third name with high upside to the offensive scenario increases the probability of a breakout on that side; I'd like our chances of accomplishing the pitching scenario if we could somehow add another potential arm... Cortes is just a bit too young. Rosa is probably a reliever. The pressure is that much heavier on Davies and Hoch.

April 5, 2009 at 12:27 AM

Anonymous Dave said...

Isaac,

I don't like TJ either, but having a late inning defensive replacement on the roster isn't the end of the world. Obviously the alternative, Shealy, isn't as highly regarded as we thought as not one team put a claim on him. I don't think Pena is good by any means, but I don't think he is as bad as he was last year either. Besides, wouldn't you feel better about our chances of winning a one run game going into the ninth with Soria pitching, Teahen sliding to first, Aviles sliding to second, and TJ coming in to play SS? I would...

April 5, 2009 at 8:47 AM

Anonymous Matt said...

the more I read this blog the more I can't wait to go to the Royals-Yankees game on Saturday. Im kind of glad I didnt try harder to get opening day tickets, Ponson seriously!? thats no way to open a stadium

April 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

TPJ is nice to put on the roster, good defense and even a little bit of speed if he's needed to pinch run for someone like Jacobs, Butler or one of the catchers. Then again Bloomquist and Callaspo could do that too.

April 5, 2009 at 9:03 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A massive change in hitting philosophy was required, and to his credit Dayton Moore undertook one."

Not sure you can credit Moore with undertaking a massive change in hitting philosophy just by bringing back Seitzer to KC. Lest we forget, his 3 major (if you can really call them all that) were Jacobs, Bloomquist, and Crisp. And only 1 of them has a career OBP over even .322.

Seems like the same exact organizational hitting philosophy that led to the smallest amount of walks in team history, if you ask me.

April 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Lest we forget, his 3 major (if you can really call them all that) offensive acquisitions were Jacobs, Bloomquist, and Crisp. And only 1 of them has a career OBP over even .322."

That is how it should have read.

April 5, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Blogger Jared Launius said...

great stuff Rany.

picking the Royals to win 85 games this year is kind of like taking a high school player with a lottery pick in the NBA draft. There's a ton of upside there, but there's also a high probability that things don't pan out like we're planning.

Here's hoping we're more of the LeBron James/Dwight Howard variety than the Kwame Brown/Eddy Curry one.

April 5, 2009 at 3:08 PM

Anonymous AxDxMx said...

Rany,

Nothing screams fluke about Cliff Lee? How about this:

5 GS against Royals
4 GS against Twins
3 GS against Tigers

No more than 2 against any other team. My guess is the CYA was earned somewhere in those starts against the Royals and Twins (The Tigers hammered him), as he went 7-1 in those starts. No one is more responsible than the Royals though, who allowed him to go 5-0 in his 5 starts against them.

April 5, 2009 at 6:13 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Nothing screams fluke about Cliff Lee? How about this:

5 GS against Royals
4 GS against Twins
3 GS against Tigers"

The Twins, Tigers, and White Sox were 4,5,and 6, respectively, in runs scored. That's not much of an indictment on his season. If thats the best fluke you have then we're going to be in trouble against Lee again.

April 5, 2009 at 7:53 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

One more rain-out and we avoid Sidney for the home opener! I've never actually hoped a game gets rained out before, it feels kind of weird.

April 6, 2009 at 8:10 AM

Blogger Nathan W said...

I figured I should leave a comment today seeing as I took a precious vacation day today to go to The Cell and now have nothing to do. Ugh.

Does anyone know if I can turn my 6 tickets in for today's game into tickets for any game or if I have to use them for the game tomorrow?

April 6, 2009 at 10:31 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nathan,

Rain check policy in KC states you can use them for any game, not just the following game. I'm sure this is a standard policy and the same in Chicago.

April 6, 2009 at 11:11 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.