Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Rany on the Royals

"Royals Today: 5/19/2009."

14 Comments -

1 – 14 of 14
Anonymous Anonymous said...

john gibbons not jay gibbons

May 19, 2009 at 7:10 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

WOW.

Re: Tonight's game.

May 19, 2009 at 9:38 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

58 patients, shmifty eight patients. How many of them have hit back-to-back jacks and a game-tying triple off a former 20-strikeout pitcher?

May 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM

Anonymous AxDxMx said...

I will never forget being in the stadium tonight. I hope to experience the same intensity and crowd noise again some day in the playoffs. Awesome win!

May 20, 2009 at 12:06 AM

Anonymous Casper said...

Does anyone else think Brett was just mad at the media because the camera man was blocking Brett's view of the beer girls?

I appreciate Brett's fire. It's what endeared him to this city as a player. But his passion notwithstanding, I still think Hillman is a poor leader and an even poorer strategist. I think it is beyond debate that he lost control of this team a year ago and it was Moore that chewed their asses out that caused the September resurgence. Why else would Hillman need a fellow Texana to help him on the bench in Gibbons? He needed a buddy to be his wingman and have his back with the team in the clubhouse.

But whatever. It's the midwest, the land of blaming the "liberal media" for covering stuff that people are talking about already. Way to get in line and blend in with the locals, George. (yawns)

Alright, I've helped stir the pot. Let's here the inevitable attempt at a retort, people...

May 20, 2009 at 12:09 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are no hopeless Cardinals fans. Cubs fans, As fans, Nationals fans, sure. I grew up in KC in the '60s, when we didn't have a major league team, just the As, who were a Yankees farm team.

I certainly hope the Royals sweep the Cards, but my fantasy team wants every Cards run to be generated by Albert, and all the Royals runs from Billy "Mini-Sweeney" Butler.

And tonight's game was certainly a fine example of the difference between this year and previous ones. Tater, tater, walk, triple, sac fly. Not gonna happen before.

May 20, 2009 at 12:45 AM

Blogger Unknown said...

Would it be such a bad thing if Ponson and Hochevar switched places? Quite frankly, I've been satisfied with Sir Sidney all season. Of course, my expectations for him have also taken the fact that he's a #4 into account. Bottom line: he's kept us reasonably in most games, and he's eaten a ton of innings, which makes our bullpen so much fresher for all of our games.

Hochevar's debut coincided with our biggest losing streak of the season, and while it would be unfair to pin that all on him, he could be responsible for more than just one game based on the impact pulling him after two innings has on the bullpen.

He's clearly not in a position to go five innings or more right now. His last start was promising, but I say put him in the pen till he knows how to get major leaguers out. His last MLB win was in July last year. He's got the stuff and he's got the control, he just needs to put it all together before he's starting games.

And GREAT WIN tonight, I was there, maybe the best game I've been to in 6+ years of being a hardcore fan.

May 20, 2009 at 1:11 AM

Blogger kcghost said...

As a baseball analyst Brett was one heckuva hitter.

Number 1 pick in the draft and we get a guy with no stones. Drafting Hochevar was a bad move then and remains a bad move.

The Porcello thing is not that big a deal. It's not like Moustakis is chopped liver (though he may turn out to be) and that high school pitchers have a great success rate. From the lens the Royals were looking through at the time of the draft they cannot be faulted here. Anybody can draft well when they get to do it years later.

May 20, 2009 at 8:20 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ask Leitch if he still wears his Royals hot dog race "Ketchup" t-shirt from 2006.

May 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM

Anonymous Chance said...

In New York and Boston, the fans stick around to see their teams pull off the inevitable comeback in late innings. In KC, I'm not sure that we will ever take that sort of win for granted, and come to expect it, but damn, that win sure gave me goosebumps.

As for Hillman, and the "inevitable attempt at a retort" to Caspar's post, let me give it a try (half-heartedly): I don't blame Hillman for losing the team last year. That's a hell of an anchor to have hanging around your neck, meaning Jose Guillen. What could Hillman do, bench his only productive hitter? I bet he wanted to, and I also bet that GMDM didn't have his back on it. As for his strategic lapses, I think more needs to be written about his good moves, like the suicide squeeze and the fact that he didn't screw the game up last night by getting in the way of the most exciting comeback in years. Didn't anyone else expect to see at least one pinch-hitter during the ninth? Not that it would have made sense, or anything.....

May 20, 2009 at 10:12 AM

Blogger Unknown said...

I'm just amazed that Olivo took a walk (and took all the way on 3-1). He gambled on that pitch (stating after the game that everyone throws him sliders away on 3-1), but it was a smart gamble that he should make more often.

After watching two straight guys go yard before him, and knowing how hard Olivo likes to swing, I figured he's swing out of his shoes at the first three pitches. Kudos to him for (finally) showing some discipline last night. I just wish he'd make that effort more often.

I didn't become convinced that we had a chance until he walked. That was stranger to me than the back-to-back homers.

May 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Anonymous Roy in Omaha said...

I don't think Brett was talking to you, directly, at all. Putting yourself in the same league with the morons he DID call out is being pretty harsh on yourself since you've probably forgotten more about baseball than the guys he mentioned ever knew. I'd be frustrated, too, if I still lived in K.C. and had to listen to anything Keven Kietzman has to say about the Royals, or, baseball in general, on a regular basis. What a sad state of affairs it is when we have guys like him shoved in our face, somebody that most casual fans are a lot smarter than.

I'm not a Hillman fan at all. I know what it looks like when it's being done right (see:Whitey Herzog & Dick Howser) and this ain't it. The Royals are succeeding so far in spite of him, not because of him. I don't care what nice things Tony LaRussa supposedly said about him. I can easily name 10 managers in the game I'd rather have at this point. Trey, I'm from the "Show Me State". You're gonna have to "show me" and you haven't even come close as yet. Do you even understand what the words "platoon differential" mean? Sheesh.

May 20, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The IBB to Guillen didn't come until Rich Hill had fallen behind in the count 3-1. So it's not like Trembley called for the intentional walk immediately. With a base open and a 3-1 count on one of our only power threats, I can see why a manager would go ahead and put Guillen on base rather than be forced to groove a pitch to Jose Guillen in a 3-1 count.

May 21, 2009 at 1:51 AM

Blogger Antonio. said...

I'm interested in the guy saying he thinks Hillman is targeted too much yet he was surprised that Hillman didn't screw up the game with a PH

May 21, 2009 at 4:35 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.