More caches found:

"History is all around..."
"Frozen In Time"
"AV8R"
"For the love of the Game"

New Michele Branch album "hotel paper" - early Christmas gift - I like it - why the two different websites, though (michellebranch.net and michellebranch.com)?

Policies at geocaching.com that I think should be changed:

"virtual caches aren't the basis of the sport" - says who? Finding a virtual cache is just as (or more) rewarding, difficult, and sporty as regular caches. In light of 9/11 and legal issues with regard to private property (not to mention all the public/federal places that are banning geocaching), I think virtual caches are the only way the sport is going to survive. Way too many cache hiders are not asking permission to place their caches, and are subsequently getting in trouble - even here locally.

Lift the moritorium on locationless (reverse) caches - same reasoning as above - these are a great alternative to tramping across private/commercial property with security guards hassling you every step of the way.

Local approvers should be just that - local, not some shmuck from the next state over that has happened to vacation here once upon a time.

Blogmatrix's servers seem to be doing funny things lately - my RSS feed seems to be currently unreachable...   =(   UPDATE: I guess they had a major crash, but it's now working again.

We just sent out our family Christmas newsletters today - look for yours in the mail soon!

Bonny's birthday party recently.

MS Outlook 2002 on an XP system is goofy - when you receive an email message with a Macintosh attachment (like a *.sit file), it doesn't think there's really an attachment (even though it's clearly there). When you try to save the attachment using "file...save attachment as...", the only attachment listed is "none" - although when you click on "none", the reesulting dialog box does know that the *.sit file is the one being saved. Strange - or deliberate on M$'s part? You be the judge.

Ok, here's another weird Outlook 2002 thing: the ALT+letter keyboard shortcut labelling is confusing. When composing a message, a key combination of ALT+s sends the message (there's an underline on the send button). But in the file menu, a ALT+s (well, an 's' after the alt - there needs to be a pause in between) saves the message, whilst ALT+pause+e actually sends it. It's even more confusing because the CTRL+letter combinations also come into play with a CTRL+ENTER to send, and an CTRL+S to save. No wonder people have such a hard time figuring out their computers.