Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Mayerson on Animation

"Bob Jaques"

3 Comments -

1 – 3 of 3
Blogger Pete Emslie said...

I'm hoping Bob doesn't limit his blog posts to just his analyses of "Popeye", as I would love to see samples of his own work too. Bob's studio, Carbunkle Cartoons, was responsible for the best looking episodes of "Ren and Stimpy". As a cartoonist himself, Bob's no slouch! He's also got an uncanny knack for celebrity caricature too, samples of which he should also post on his blog.

October 31, 2007 1:51 PM

Blogger Mark Mayerson said...

Peter, you and Bob are the two best caricaturists I've had the pleasure to know. I'm glad that you're blogging caricatures and I agree that Bob should do the same.

October 31, 2007 1:56 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Guys,
Thanks for the compliments. Caricaturing was always a good way to get a cheap laugh.

Mark - thanks for highlighting my blog. I wish in retrospect that I had devoted more time to interviewing the Fleischer/Famous Studio old-timers. I'm glad they're finally getting their due respect.

I remember the day I cornered the New York animator imports in the hallway of Nelvana. You were there, Tom Sito, and Gian Celestri. I started asking you guys about the Fleischer/Famous animators and everyone in the group looked at me as though I had festering boils covering my face. I also recall Gian Celestri thinking that Johnny Gent was a hack until I dragged him into Brian Lemay's room one day and showed him some of Johnny's footage from 'For Better or Nurse' that was playing on his TV.

Peter - I think I'll keep the blog to strictly Popeye cartoons, related trivia and minutia. I think it’s still too early in my career to be analyzing my own work - I thought that was done once you retire. I’d be happy to answer any inquiries though.

November 04, 2007 10:03 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot