Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Mayerson on Animation

"Right & Wrong: Morality and the Story Structure of Pinocchio"

3 Comments -

1 – 3 of 3
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good stuff, Mark. The final observation about the villains being left un-vanquished is perhaps one of the strongest arguments for Pinnochio being Disney's most "realistic" film. Realistic in the sense that the world will always have evil and there isn't a time in this life where evil is done away with leaving only fairy tale bliss where everybody "lives happily ever after". By not constraining the full effects of the world to the boundaries of the eventual happiness and resolution of the core character's conflicts, Dosney leaves the edges of this universe very large- even while the core story has far fewer characters (both hero and villain) than most modern animated films. By resolving all influences of evil in the world one closes off the size of the universe and no amount of additional cast and set locations will expand that universe ("Bauty & the Beast is a fine example of the opposite effect- a large universe, lots of characters, lots of set pieces- but it's all tidily packaged up in the end- happily ever after).

Leaving evil unpunished, unrepentant and powerfully intact to threaten again is an interestingly positive way to allow reality to define the film's world without resorting to the cynical or anti-heroical approach that is all too easily employed in the current era. A film can be "edgy" with lots of "reality" and NOT be a snarky, cynical kill the good guys ending.

One can definitely see Disney's staunch humanist ideals poking out in all corners of the film. In every sense the world view behind the film's central theme is an American one. Disney's is not a christian outlook in the strictest definition as some folks commonly portray, but definitely a humanist one. That is not unless one defines a 'christian' outlook by the syncretized version of western pragmatic, self sufficient morality & self redemption and not by the source material of accepting a state of utter devastation wherein no amount of moral accuity empowers one to enact self-redemption. The source christian view stands on the premise that only by submission to divine influence and regeneration can any rescue be found. A life of well executed morality isn't the power to enact rescue, merely the symptom of already having been rescued. Modern humanism - such as drove Disney's story engine here- rather emphasizes the ability for self redemption- whether by education, morality, strength, beauty -pick the trait you wish to value. But if I'm not careful I can turn a conversation about morality in stories into a discussion about theology in stories. :)

Thanks for sharing- again. :o)

May 17, 2007 2:31 PM

Blogger Michael J. Ruocco said...

Whoa! Great observation, Mark! I couldn't come up with an explanation like that even if my life depended on it. A very thourough & detailed observation, indeed.

As a child, I was scared of Pinocchio. It frightened me. But as I got older, I embraced it as the masterpiece that it really is. It's the perfect story. No other film can come remotely close to Pinocchio in the ways you described it here. Great work & thanks for the insight.

May 17, 2007 8:42 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I had my own little epiphany today about the true story underlying Pinnochio (mind you, I'm a 47 year old mother thinking of her 14 year old son experiencing Pinocchio-like issues) and I found your explanation. It was the most enlightening and beautiful read. What's so stunning is how true-to-life this story still is, how ever present the dance between morality and pleasure seeking remains, and how it sometimes takes middle-age life to see it from the other side with eyes anew. Thank you.

August 30, 2016 9:50 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot