Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"The Hadron-Muon Branching Ratio"

6 Comments -

1 – 6 of 6
Blogger Arun said...

Dear Bee and Stefan,

Your Plottl a Day reminds me why I fell in love with physics in the first place!

Many thanks!
Best,
-Arun

9:44 AM, December 12, 2007

Anonymous Uncle Al said...

Nucleus-electron neutral current exchange, Z(zero), renders all atoms slightly chiral,

http://www.phys.washington.edu/users/fortson/intro.html#AtomPNC
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~budker/PubList.html

Z is big stuff even at small energies! Physics' chirality is nuisance rather than fundamental basis. That may change within 20 days. 144 single crystal benzil test masses have arrived at 45.04 degrees north latitude. Two DSCs are reserved 27-30 Dec. Gardyloo!

4:23 PM, December 12, 2007

Anonymous kovil said...

It looks like you are discovering the fractal nature of the wavefunction interaction that particle production physics is examining. It keeps on in its fractal exposition of energies, to keep showing wavenode interaction amplitudes with wide band null zones between the hi/low nodes, which have additional topographical structures on their peak curves, which generate the next iteration in the fractal. Congratulations on mapping this energy level. Cern will show a magnification of the aforementioned 'additional topographical structures'.

11:32 AM, December 27, 2007

Blogger Ralph said...

According to this,

http://www.physorg.com/news124372618.html

electron-positron collisions at very high energies have now been observed to sometimes produce protons and neutrons. I find this astonishing. What about conservation of baryon number? I guess that went the way of the dodo and my college education.

Seriously, should I be surprised by this result, or not?

10:46 PM, March 10, 2008

Blogger stefan said...

Hi Ralph,

thanks for the link! Indeed, the statement in the first paragraph about the new way to produce those basic particles of atoms, protons and neutrons is a bit misleading.

Your concerns about baryon number conservation is completely justified, and indeed, the experiment is the "First Observation of the Decay Ds+ to proton anti-neutron" ( arXiv:0803.1118v1). So, with a proton and an antineutron as decay products, baryon number after the decay is zero, as it was before for the Ds+ meson (made up of a charm and an anti-strange quark).

In general, decays of mesons into baryon-antibaryon pairs are rare compared to decays into other mesons because of the high mass of the decay products (the mass of the Ds+ is just about 5 percent higher than the combined mass of the proton and the antineutron), and because in the decay process, two quark-antiquark pairs have to be "pulled" out of the vacuum, and they have to combine not to three mesons, but to the baryon and the antibaryon. I guess that's the reason why one can learn something about the strong interaction and the hadronisation mechanism from the analysis of such decays. And, for the Ds+, there is of course the extra complication of the flavour-changing weak processes to get rid of charm and strangeness...


Best, Stefan

9:05 PM, March 11, 2008

Blogger Ralph said...

Thanks, Stefan. Now I don't feel quite so antiquated. Still, getting a proton, even along with an anti-neutron, sounds creepy and makes me feel a bit nervous. That's alotta energy.

9:20 PM, March 11, 2008

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL