Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"So this is Christmas"

29 Comments -

1 – 29 of 29
Blogger Arun said...

LOL!

Merry Christmas to the two of you! and much happy baking!

10:35 AM, December 22, 2009

Blogger Andrew Thomas said...

Yeah, merry Christmas Bee & Stefan & everyone on this blog!

10:46 AM, December 22, 2009

Blogger T. said...

Very fun!
Can smell the cakes from Paris.
Joyeuses fêtes!

10:49 AM, December 22, 2009

Anonymous Uncle Al said...

"As though her physical theorist's brain could contain the secrets of organic synthesis." (apologies to Forbidden Planet)

the apartment has a brand new energy-efficient floor heating. An Enviro-whiner is a Luddite with government subsidy. All they want is everything of value you have. It's so efficient it doesn't heat. QED.

Festivus!

11:01 AM, December 22, 2009

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

From what you relate it appears that my theory where for you the effort increases inversely proportionate to the difficulty of the task is correct by reason of experiment. So what should we call such a law? Now I know why you chose theoretical physics as a profession, since in you assuming it being so difficult for you would require the least effort :-) Seriously though I do hope things go more smoothly for you and Stefan for the rest of the holidays. Also you never said if you found out when they would fix the heating.

Best,

Phil

11:08 AM, December 22, 2009

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

Just as I was about to go out to do a little last minute Xmas shopping a name for my proposed law came to mind; that is how about I call it Bumbledynamics:-)

Best,

Phil

11:29 AM, December 22, 2009

Anonymous Christine said...

Hi Bee,

Looks delicious.

But in the kitchen we diverge. Again this year I'll prepare the Christimas dinner. This means several, elaborate dishes. I send everybody out of the kitchen, permission to enter: denied. I work alone, fast, efficiently, concentrated. No talk, no wasted time, no parallel processes. No one, only myself. No interferences. Otherwise, it doesn't work for me. I do work very well and very fast this way, and then gain some time afterwards. Kitchen can be a time sink. My hunsband is sent to the kitchen to wash the dishes and pans. :)

Best,
Christine

1:33 PM, December 22, 2009

Anonymous Christine said...

And evidently that's the way I work in *my* kitchen. Otherwise (in someone else's kitchen), I am hopelessly lost.

Best,
Christine

2:09 PM, December 22, 2009

Blogger Wayne Farmer said...

And this, folks, is why it's wise to keep theoretical and experimental physicists a safe distance apart. With you two at the controls of the LHC, anything could happen!

Happy and warm holidays to you both. And I love the PI's "Alice and Bob in Wonderland" series! Were you like Alice when you were a girl, Bee? :)

6:09 PM, December 22, 2009

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Christine,

So you're one of those that firmly believes that to many cooks spoil the broth. It sounds like you pull it off with almost military efficiency. As for the no one else in the kitchen rule, with the past experience here where you’ve been fired up, suggesting risking the prospect of getting a pot in the head I would never attempt to break it:-) All joking aside and before I forget I wish you, Fabiano and Pedro a Merry Christmas and all the best in the New Year.

Best,

Phil

6:42 PM, December 22, 2009

Anonymous Anonymous Snowboarder said...

Bee - as it is that time of year ConEd has been running seasonal safety tips on the tv and radio, clearly your friend never heard this one:

Do not try to heat rooms with your range or oven. These appliances aren't designed for space heating. Using a range or oven can cause a fire. It can also deplete oxygen levels and cause a buildup of lethal carbon monoxide (CO), a colorless, odorless, poisonous gas that can cause serious illness or death if inhaled in large concentrations for even a short period of time.

Please remember in case the floor shuts off again!

11:25 PM, December 22, 2009

Blogger Bee said...

Hi Christine,

I am sure your Christmas dinner will be a full success! I'm afraid I'm too impatient to be a good cook, and I tend to freely reinterpret recipes. Anyway, merry Christmas! Best,

B.

3:43 AM, December 23, 2009

Blogger Bee said...

Hi Wayne,

No, I wasn't like Alice. My voice has always been on the deeper side. Happy holidays to you too! Best,

B.

3:45 AM, December 23, 2009

Anonymous Christine said...

Hi Phil,

It sounds like you pull it off with almost military efficiency.

Ha! You're right, that's what they say. And that's what working in a military institute does to a civil. :) I'm joking. I've always been somewhat "military" in some activities, specially when it comes to decluttering and cleaning. I've not always been a "cooker" though, nor I consider myself as a particularly fine one. But it is true that marriage forces us to learn on thing or another.

I wish you and your family also a Merry Christmas!

Christine

5:16 AM, December 23, 2009

Anonymous Christine said...

Hi Bee,

Thanks! I hope you have a nice dinner too. In fact, my behavior in the kitchen is the result of some impatience as well, so I try to work as fast as I can, as long as not to disturb the final quality too much. I also tend to change recipes if necessary (i.e., if some not very crucial ingredient is missing).

Merry Christmas to you and Stefan!

Christine

5:22 AM, December 23, 2009

Blogger Kay zum Felde said...

Hi Bee, hi Stefan,

so this story with the heating system that doesn't work is on the top. Indeed very efficient.

Merry Christmas to you two and all on this blog.

Best Kay

10:28 AM, December 23, 2009

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So this blog mutates from Backreaction to Back-Reaction. Fröhliche Weihnachten! :)

10:56 AM, December 23, 2009

Blogger Zephir said...

P.F. 2@1@ 2all backers of backreactionary bakers..

http://kecy.roumen.cz/vesele_vanoce_2009.jpg

1:37 PM, December 23, 2009

Anonymous Giotis said...

Why i have to pay for the article of SciAm? If I'm poor I don't have the right to know more about the multiverse? Internet is revolutionary exactly because it permits free access to knowledge. Ordinary people can now spread knowledge and ideas for free without any restrictions or intermediates. So as a first reaction to this, I propose not to link articles that need subscription.

1:55 PM, December 23, 2009

Blogger Andrew Thomas said...

Maybe you have to pay in your universe, but the article is free to read in mine.

I can just see where this highly-speculative "Life in the Multiverse" idea is going to go. Within 10 years we'll have papers describing the sort of animals which would live there, then within 20 years we'll have CGI TV natural history programmes featuring all those strange new animals.

2:59 PM, December 23, 2009

Blogger Bee said...

Hi Andrew,

Yes, I had a very similar thought when I read the SciAm article :-) I liked it, though it's more fiction than science. I'm not a multiverse fan, but the article actually gets across a lot of particle physics. Best,

B.

2:40 AM, December 24, 2009

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Before I miss the chance, let me extend my heartfelt wish that the authors of this blog, all those contributing comment or torment and all others of the same more basic genome, to have a Merry Christmas, born of having aspirations to be able realize happiness and joy which are universal to all.

Sincerely,

Phil

8:04 AM, December 24, 2009

Blogger Plato said...

So as a first reaction to this, I propose not to link articles that need subscription.

I agree with you Goitis and from this point I will do same.

Best,

9:42 AM, December 24, 2009

Blogger Bee said...

Giotis, Plato: Sorry, I'm not with you on that. I'm all for open access, but that's not the way to achieve it. When I find an article worth mentioning for whatever reason good or bad, I'll mention it and link to it. It is unfortunate, but quite a few of the articles I've written about on this blog were subscription only. And the guys at SciAm have to live from something too. I can afford writing unpaid, but they probably can't. Until there is a better solution. Best,

B.

9:55 AM, December 24, 2009

Blogger Bee said...

Should probably add that I don't have a subscription either. For this reason it happens very rarely that I mention a SciAm article. Best,

B.

9:57 AM, December 24, 2009

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

I agree that at this point in time those who publish things must have some way to be able not just to make a living yet also cover the costs in their infrastructure However it would be nice that perhaps for just one day a year,with tomorrow being a most worthy one that all the online journals and magazines allow free and open access.

Also in connection with this as we speak Jimmy Wales being one who has carried and worked so hard towards its realization is making a appeal for those that can to have us help make it happen. I would suggest tomorrow would also a be good day for all not to simply say we wish good things for the world, yet take the action necessary to have them to be realized.

Best,

Phi

10:13 AM, December 24, 2009

Anonymous Giotis said...

If you advertise these articles then you prompt implicitly the readers to subscribe. If millions of people subscribe then more and more will adopt this policy and you'll end up with a closed, privatised Web. We don't want this to happen.

In that respect Plato made a good decision.

10:27 AM, December 24, 2009

Blogger Bee said...

There's no good solution, the question is which solution is the least bad. As I said above, I'll link to articles I mention, and I'll mention what I find interesting, whether that's subscription or not. I have no inclination whatsoever to constrain my commentaries or links to open access articles. However, as I said, since I have no subscription to any magazine, this is unlikely to happen often. Anyway, I'm off now for the Christmas dinner :-) Best,

B.

10:35 AM, December 24, 2009

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

So in order to prompt the availability of free food I guess it would be best to take action to starve all the farmers who currently provide it while and before we find another way. I say stop seeing only negatively as to take negative action as being the solution to the world’s problems and rather take charge as I just pointed out by way of positive thoughts prompting positive steps. Not that I mean to implicate anyone, yet I would wonder of all those that cry for free access how many have ever contributed money or their resource in adding something to its writing or editing. In my way of thinking talk is cheap, while action costs, with no way around it. So I would rather have us ask ourselves, particularly at this time of year, whether we are either givers or only takers and then act accordingly true to ourselves.

" the unexamined life is not worth living "

-Socrates (long before him many whose birth they celebrate tommorrow)

10:57 AM, December 24, 2009

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL