Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"Ice IX"

5 Comments -

1 – 5 of 5
Blogger Peter Turney said...

If I recall Cat's Cradle correctly, the destruction of the world was not "accidental". The creator of ice nine knew exactly what he was doing.

8:01 PM, October 21, 2008

Blogger CapitalistImperialistPig said...

Since his brother was an expert on ice, I think Vonnegut also Knew what he was doing.

10:02 PM, October 21, 2008

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for the insight as I’ve always found it fascinating how solids are often more complicated then first considered with not only having one temperature defining them. The one that fascinates me personally the most is carbon, which many consider as being simply a lump of coal yet is found in forms so diverse in qualities ranging being naturally the hardest substance as with diamond or so soft as with soot and still other forms so strong being the extended Fullerenes recently discovered. With all those types of solid water you’ve pointed to I also wonder how many when actually first observed would present themselves as initially recognizable for what they are?

Best,

Phil

7:00 AM, October 22, 2008

Anonymous anonymous snowboarder said...

Bee - been away a few so missed this.. Did you catch the Physics World from this past winter with the article on snowflakes? I've actually got the book by the same author (no shock there!). Snowflakes are really amazing.

6:57 PM, October 29, 2008

Blogger Bee said...

Hi Snowboarder,

Nice to see you around. We had the first snow today, how is it in Vermont? No, I didn't read the article, but come to think of it last year's Physics Today issues are probably somewhere in the pile on my desk. Best,

B.

7:31 PM, October 29, 2008

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL