Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"German Interlude"

12 Comments -

1 – 12 of 12
Blogger Bee said...

it just crossed my mind he might have meant to say 'superstringtheory' instead of 'supersymmetry', that would have made sense.

2:47 PM, May 05, 2008

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

With your Prof. Dr. Horst Stöcker’s ability to not allow the interviewer to get a word in edgewise did you experience the same difficulty when he was your
advisor? I would also be curious if he was present at your dissertation for then that truly could prove to be a problem :-)

By the way, even though I don’t sprechen Deutsch, Ich verstehen vieles von dem, was gesagt wurde, with all those words of science that are common within the languages.

Best,

Phil

7:16 AM, May 06, 2008

Blogger Bee said...

Hi Phil,

No I didn't have any specific problem with my advisor. Yes, he was present during my defense if that's what you mean? As far as I can recall he was very well behaved ;-) I don't know what other people's experience is but the way I perceived it the defense after the years of PhD is more or less a formality anyhow. All the people at the department already know you, have had all their time to ask you anything they want to, and you've probably already given several seminars on the topic. What made me nervous were the experimentalists, because it isn't hard to ask me questions about detector characteristics or background subtraction that I can't answer (but they were all very nice). Best,

B.

7:37 AM, May 06, 2008

Anonymous Rhys said...

This is a real test of my very poor German! (But there were definitely some "kleine schwarze Löcher explodieren", and I think we only have to be scared "wenn ein schwarzes Loch schwer ist" ;-) )

I think you're right, Bee - it only seems to make sense if he meant superstrings, not supersymmetry.

11:43 AM, May 06, 2008

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

“I don't know what other people's experience is but the way I perceived it the defense after the years of PhD is more or less a formality anyhow.”

Well as you can imagine I have no first hand experience. From the few I know that have been through it I would say it has somewhat to do with how provocative the concept your defending, as it relates to how mainstream it is. For instance, to defend a thesis related to string theory 25 years ago might have been the end of ones academic career, where today it would be considered almost ho hum. It would be interesting to see the reaction to Garrett Lisi’s concept if presented as a dissertation. What do you think, smooth sailing or direct passage back to the surf hut?

Best,

Phil

2:12 AM, May 07, 2008

Comment deleted

This comment has been removed by the author.

2:37 AM, May 07, 2008

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

Just as a P.S. to the above. As you are in Germany giving a talk on the false perceptions people have as to the dangers in regards to the LHC, Prof. Dr. Gerard t Hooft will be giving a PI public lecture entitled “Science Fiction & Reality”. Now I’m aware that Dr.t Hooft is Dutch and not German, yet it is interesting to note that both you and he, with you there and him here, will try to have people distinguish what is real from what is fantasy :-)

Best,

Phil

2:41 AM, May 07, 2008

Anonymous Chris Oakley said...

Sorry, but even with my limited German I can tell that what Stöcker is saying is mostly speculative hype - the kind of thing that Peter Woit has been justifiably complaining about for years. He would be better off telling the truth: all this will do is to marshall a few crazies who think that the LHC is going to destroy the universe.

3:03 AM, May 07, 2008

Blogger Bee said...

Hi Phil,

Yes, and I'm really sorry I will miss t'Hooft's public lecture, but I didn't know that when I scheduled my talk. Are you going?

Best,

B.

3:07 AM, May 07, 2008

Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

Yes I will be there (that is ruling out a freak snow storm). It seems we are destined to remain somewhat separated in terms of space time:-)

Best,

Phil

3:18 AM, May 07, 2008

Blogger Bee said...

Chris, I think you better not criticise interviews if you don't speak the language. Horst didn't say anywhere the LHC is going to test string theory, so your accusation is completely unjustified. Best, B.

4:47 AM, May 07, 2008

Anonymous Chris Oakley said...


Chris, I think you better not criticise interviews if you don't speak the language. Horst didn't say anywhere the LHC is going to test string theory, so your accusation is completely unjustified.


Sure, but he did talk about the early universe and black holes ... all ammunition for the crazies.

Although it is highly likely that the early universe has some connection - if only because it was probably v. v. hot, with no usable quantum theory of gravity, does he really think it sensible to talk about black holes here?

1:38 PM, May 07, 2008

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL