Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"Cabibbo what?"

10 Comments -

1 – 10 of 10
Blogger Phil Warnell said...

Hi Bee,

Not certain who they are or what they are considering yet it appears many of them had already adopted the John S. Bell look. Then again I suppose we could attribute the fashion to a few other physicists at the time :-)

Best,

Phil

P.S. Grateful the mysterious female is not also sporting a beard, yet delighted to find she does have her love beads on :-)

7:18 AM, July 12, 2012

Blogger Lord of the Ping said...

It's spelled "nucular", not "nucelar"!

SCNR

7:28 AM, July 12, 2012

Blogger andrewg said...

The guy on the right can't work out what they've written on the blackboard either.

7:54 AM, July 12, 2012

Blogger Unknown said...

The guy to the right is Finn Ravndal (Oslo), my old MSc supervisor, retiring from our department this summer. He did his PhD with Feynman. The woman is Cecilia Jarlskog (Lund), retired a few years back, and was on the NORDITA board until 2010 I think. The pic is from the 70ies, and I'm sure Hans Hansson can tell you who the others are. No:2 from the left looks a bit like Petter Minnhagen (who still wears this type of beard, last time I saw him anyway) but probably it's not him..

8:16 AM, July 12, 2012

Blogger Phillip Helbig said...

The chap with the seaman's beard reminds me of Bengt Gustafsson, who AFAIK has always worn a seaman's beard. However, while he does know a huge amount about a lot of subjects, he's primarily an astrophysicist (stellar atmospheres), so I don't think that's him.

10:22 AM, July 12, 2012

Blogger Luboš Motl said...

The triplet is a lepton triplet - positively charged lepton, neutrino, and negatively charged lepton. Homework exercise: what's wrong with this model?

1:39 AM, July 13, 2012

Blogger Bee said...

Well, there's no such triplet in the SM. Without a Lagrangian it's hard to tell though exactly what would go wrong. Probably violates some symmetry/conservation law.

12:30 AM, July 14, 2012

Blogger Arun said...

What Cecilia Jarlskog was thinking about in 1971:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321371904202

Abstract

Muon decay, without requiring conservation of the lepton charge, is examined. The coupling constants occuring in the terms of the interaction Hamiltonian which can give rise to a pair of identical neutrinos (or antineutrinos) are reffered to as the lepton-charge-violating coupling constants. Using the predicted V-A values for four decay parameters (which are close to the experimental values) we show that only four coupling constants, viz., gV and gA of the ordinary theory and (View the MathML source) and (View the MathML source) of the lepton-charge violating interactions remain undertermined. Further, only the combination (View the MathML source) can be measured. The further assumption of the two-component theory for one of the decay neutrinos gives uniquely the V-A theory (View the MathML source). Allowing for the experimental uncertainties, lepton-charge-violating scalar and pseudoscalar interactions of about the same order of magnitude as the usual scalar and pseudoscalar interactions cannot be excluded. The significance of future measurements of η′, one of the decay parameters for radiative muon decay, for finding upper limits to the scalar, pseudoscalar and tensor interactions is also discussed.

10:13 AM, July 14, 2012

Blogger Hans Mühlen said...

I asked Cecilia Jarlskog what she remembers about the occasion. She is talking to Matts Roos from Helsinki, and the subject, she thinks, seems to have been weak interaction (her field of expertise), the Cabibbo theory and its extension due to the charm quark.

3:45 AM, August 16, 2012

Blogger Amanda jarlskog said...

Its my grandma Cecilia Jarlskog :)

9:47 AM, June 15, 2015

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL