Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"This and That"

2 Comments -

1 – 2 of 2
Anonymous dark-matter said...

Sticking my neck out a bit, I think it's safe to say 'There are no strings in nature.' An achievement of LHC will be to confirm it.

What about branes? Probably not under the umbrella of 10D strings. But probable under a different foundation.

Are there loops? Since loops result from direct mathematical application of QFT on GR, both of which are real enough, it stands a better chance of being real. I.e. spacetime is quantized.

How about matter arising ONLY from a quantized spacetime under the umbrella of LQG? Probably not. My take is matter arise from both a quantized spacetime plus an element yet to be discovered. A third 'dark'.

3:10 PM, December 20, 2006

Blogger Bee said...

What about branes?

What about brains?

;-)

I am not sure that I agree on your statement 'There are no strings in nature.' I am pretty sure string theory will at least in some limit turn out to be the right way. Also, it might very well be that it becomes of utmost importance for heavy ion collisions. This has nothing to do with string theory being the theory of quantum gravity, but it has quite a lot to do with nature.

I have my problems with LQG as well, the largest problem probably being that we don't know whether gravity has a quantized version at all. I personally favour the idea that there just is no quantum gravity. But don't tell anybody, as I found out recently I'm a member of the quantum gravity group...

Best,

B.

5:16 PM, December 20, 2006

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL