DHS needs to go. If domestic law enforcement and the CIA and foreign espionage services need to coordinate, they should establish a coordination office. It should NOT be a cabinet level position. It should be a place where the agencies "hand off" investigations, or coordinate "joint" investigations into foreign-sourced and domestic-sourced crime. Period.
DHS-affiliated agencies should not be involved in providing "relief" after natural disasters either. I have seen what happened in NO when the DHS was in charge of "relief." It turned whole sections of NO into a concentration camp, except without the security.
DHS is and always has been creepy. Americans should not put up with a Gestapo or Staasi or whatever federal domestic police force. (Cannot keep 'em all straight).
Ro -- Atlas said the very same thing Monday: http://ibloga.blogspot.com/search?q=atlas
Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:27:00 pm
Anonymous said...
Well, there was more than a little discussion about the necessity of the agency at the time of its creation. Supposed to be for "coordination" among agencies - not controlling the citizens.
I would argue we never needed it - not even for the "war on terror", when one could call it that.
We made a difference. I strongly believe it was only because of bloggers this got out to the front of the news media. Which of course, just puts an even larger target on the internet for the next go around. There will be another DHS report but this time the wording will be less transparent--but the meaning will still be the same. Just because the report is withdrawn does not mean Janet has changed her mind about the "dangerous" groups out in America...like greying middle aged grandmas who pray the rosary out in front of murder mills.
DHS report withdrawn posted at 9:29 am on May 14, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano finally acknowledged defeat publicly on her department’s report on right-wing extremism. In a hearing yesterday held by the House Homeland Security Committee, Napolitano acknowledged that the report should never have been issued, that it replaced specific threats with generalities, and that the new report would focus on actual threats. The person who released the report faces “personnel action”: A contentious “Rightwing Extremism” report that warned of military veterans as possible recruits for terrorist attacks against the U.S. was not authorized, has been withdrawn and is being rewritten, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told Capitol Hill lawmakers. …Ms. Napolitano said the report titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” is not the only report she has seen that says veterans are targets for recruitment by racist and other hate groups.
“It was an assessment, not an accusation,” Ms. Napolitano said.
“It didn’t say that,” [Rep. Christopher] Carney [(D-PA)] interrupted.
“That’s right,” Ms. Napolitano responded. “That is why it should not have gone out.”
Asked whether the person who wrote the report is still employed, Ms. Napolitano said, “Appropriate personnel action is being taken.” It was actually neither. Unlike its counterpart report on the left wing, it mentioned no actual threats nor reviewed any specific groups with histories of violent action. Those groups exist, and they do try to recruit people, including but not limited to military veterans. Instead of focusing on the groups, though, the DHS report instead chose to associate broad policy positions with violence as well as describe returning veterans as a potential national-security threat in and of themselves.
Napolitano then told the committee that no process for vetting reports existed, and that DHS is now working to fix that. However, that’s not true either. We already know that civil-liberties lawyers at DHS saw the report before it went out and objected to it. DHS released it over their objections. Obviously, a vetting process does exist; it just got overruled. Who made the decision to send out the report over their objections? Why didn’t the vetting process that apparently took place get taken seriously by senior DHS leadership? Is it because they themselves believe what the report said about conservative positions on federalism and abortion?
There still seems to be an honesty problem at DHS, and there is still a personnel problem — at the very top.
5 Comments
Close this window Jump to comment formDHS needs to go. If domestic law enforcement and the CIA and foreign espionage services need to coordinate, they should establish a coordination office. It should NOT be a cabinet level position. It should be a place where the agencies "hand off" investigations, or coordinate "joint" investigations into foreign-sourced and domestic-sourced crime. Period.
DHS-affiliated agencies should not be involved in providing "relief" after natural disasters either. I have seen what happened in NO when the DHS was in charge of "relief." It turned whole sections of NO into a concentration camp, except without the security.
DHS is and always has been creepy. Americans should not put up with a Gestapo or Staasi or whatever federal domestic police force. (Cannot keep 'em all straight).
Ro
Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:15:00 pm
Ro -- Atlas said the very same thing Monday: http://ibloga.blogspot.com/search?q=atlas
Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:27:00 pm
Well, there was more than a little discussion about the necessity of the agency at the time of its creation. Supposed to be for "coordination" among agencies - not controlling the citizens.
I would argue we never needed it - not even for the "war on terror", when one could call it that.
Creepy, creepy, creepy.
Ro
Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:14:00 pm
We made a difference. I strongly believe it was only because of bloggers this got out to the front of the news media. Which of course, just puts an even larger target on the internet for the next go around.
There will be another DHS report but this time the wording will be less transparent--but the meaning will still be the same. Just because the report is withdrawn does not mean Janet has changed her mind about the "dangerous" groups out in America...like greying middle aged grandmas who pray the rosary out in front of murder mills.
Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:02:00 pm
I temporary retreat on the part of Napolitano. Watch for the same to return in a different form.
Bloggers, be on the lookout!
Friday, May 15, 2009 2:36:00 pm