1 – 5 of 5
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Western occupation and ethnic cleansing of the oil-fields and necessary transport corridors (only a tiny fraction of the land areas of Dar al-Islam), with a new iron curtain built around the rest of the Islamic world and all Muslims in the west deported.

AND/OR

Nuking Mecca and with vaporization of the Kaaba and its meteorite. This would show the Muslims that Allah wasn't very Akhbar.

Monday, March 10, 2008 5:06:00 pm

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Option #2 for and #3: Nuke'em

Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:32:00 pm

Blogger Pastorius said...

Nuking the Islamic world does not seem like the best decision to me.

Making a law that designates the preaching of Sharia law the equivalent of sedition does seem valid to me. Many Muslims would choose expulsion over a lifetime in jail, or the death penalty.

And many others would choose another way of life other than Sharia.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008 3:44:00 pm

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have always thought the idea a MAD type policy against Mecca and Medina makes good sence - as the only thing the followers of Isalm understand is force and the willingness to use it.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:25:00 pm

Blogger Pastorius said...

Of course, highly-ranked members of the Iranian government have said they wouldn't mind losing a few million of their people in a nuclear war with Israel, because it would mean they could kill all the Jews.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:10:00 pm

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot