1 – 1 of 1
Blogger Nepos Libertas said...

There is a difference -- some "blue" states may be 'generous' in providing luxury to habitual sexual predators (California) while "red states" like South Carolina (where the financially despaired man died penniless).

California is where the majority of habitual sex offenders reside and creep with one of the largest state prison populations in the nation. Rapists, child molesters, child pornographers and peeping tom perverts.

It amazed me that California, specifically San Francisco County, woulg "go out of the way" to assist sex offenders by providing "luxury" income.

I do believe in rehabilitating sex offenders and other criminals by providing sustainable jobs and 'public' housing (located far away from the neighborhoods) to prevent recidivism. However, I find wasting taxpayers' money to provide luxury income for depraved offenders to be immoral and an insult to the victims who may have to suffer poverty while the offender lives "high and instyle."

Every state needs to get their priorities and laws straightened out to prevent outrage like sex predator on "luxury taxpayer-subsidized welfare" and assist the homeless and the extremely impoverished to transit to sustainable job and housing.

America is screwed up as it is.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot