I once believed that the moon landing was a hoax, but years of Seeking have moved me away from that point-of-view.
I now believe that NASA did go to the moon. I also believe that Neil and Buzz found what NASA expected them to find...that others were already there.
The Moon is inhabited on its dark side and within its interior. The Moon is an artificial satellite. This can be proven by realizing that all natural stellar bodies will rotate. The Moon keeps one surface facing the Earth a all times.
That is not "natural".
Neil is sworn to secrecy because he cannot reveal what he saw on the surface of the "uninhabited, inhospitable" rock that we call the Moon.
Our Controllers are extremely cunning. I believe they are the ones who are actually behind the whole "We Never Went To The Moon" movement. Our Controllers are quite happy to have us yell "Fake!" because it diverts us all from the real Truth:
That the satellite known as the Moon is a very busy place.
Thanks for the reminder and I'm quite fond of your blog.
I noticed that out moon doesn't rotate as it orbits our earth. Is our moon the only moon in our solar system that doesn't rotate?
Be a little careful . . . the Moon does rotate. If you stood on the Moon, the stars would rise and set, just like they do on Earth, except that a lunar day is a month long, the same as the Moon's orbital period. The Moon rotates at just the right speed so that it always keeps one face pointed toward the Earth, which seems like a pretty big coincidence, doesn't it?
Your question is very interesting because the answer is that, no, the Moon is not unique. Almost all moons in the Solar System keep one face pointed toward their planet. (The only exception we know of is Hyperion, a moon of Saturn.)
Continued at: http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=142
Qrswave's discretion whether the post needs to go to salvage WUFYS' reputation. It's not my intention to impugn WUFYS's reputation as a blog for the truth-seeking contributors and audience because of what you term the blog post as "crazy".
If she decides it goes for any reason, then I will re-post on alternative blog and let readers decide what to believe.
Surely there are some WUFYS blogger and long-time 'non-antagonist' readers who still believe Apollo landings happened.
I stand by my belief, without apology and retraction, that manned lunar landings never occurred citing the impossibilities and extremely high risks of completing the mission successfully without fail and death.
Thanks for the clarification on the "rotation" question. Extremely coincidental that one side faces Earth at all times.
Nepos,
As for the Van Allen Belt, I've read that it is only moderately harmful to humans and potentially more harmful to equipment.It's not like astronauts have to bathe in the Belt. They go through it twice during the course of a round-trip.
Hey, we are missing a lot of information. "They" know, while we are left to speculate using available evidence, some of which was manufactured by "them". Our Secret Governments have access to technology hundreds, thousands of years in advance of what we are routinely shown. Earth Beings (not "human" as we know it) freely traveled to the Moon and back during the time of Atlantis. The Russians have bases on the dark side of the Moon, as do sundry and assorted um, "non-Earth-type beings". *smile*
I think the most important thing to remember is that at least we are Questioning.
Israel, Federal Reserve, Wall Street, finance and fraud, human rights, U.S. imperialism, corruption, Iran-Russia, humor (satire), President of the U.S. and other heads of state, media spin, truth and lies, treason, conspiracy theory related to Zionism and cover-ups, personal freedom of thought and movement, Big Brother...
What topics should be excluded from WUFYS as suggested by you and GB?
Perhaps there should be a reader poll conducted so I, among other contributors, will be obliged NOT to post unless approved by qrswave or other administrator upon submitting completed "draft" when the topic post do not meet "criteria" test in order to control the flow of information to make sure WUFYS is "relevant" with sensible on-topic posts.
I have posted on WUFYS (the now-defunct link WUFYS.com and Blogger) on the subject of Nibiru/Planet X, Mormon religion/cult, and now Apollo landing program.
Perhaps I should preface the strange or off-topic post with a fair warning "This blog post do not necessarily represent the view of WUFYS community. It is the author's own opinion so exercise judgment with caution" to avoid the accusation by the antagonists, skeptics and casual readers that WUFYS caters to "anti-semitic and conspiracy theory kooks".
qrswave is welcome to delete the Apollo 11 post at her discretion because it may not conform to the unwritten WUFYS policy that require the topic must be relevant and do not lend to "kooky conspiracy theorist" stereotype.
I already have submitted the identical post on alternative blog in "draft" status until the deletion is established, at which point the post will be re-published.
Anything qrs says, goes. I accept her and/or the assigned blog administrator as a de facto authority. Censorship is not an issue with me if the post in question is not deemed appropriate that does not meet the theme of WUFYS' purpose in the quest for truth in the world of lies and universal deceit.
Since I am the only "official" reader of this blog who post comments here ‘n there, so I will step up...
I will say Nepos’ article was totally on the spot. You've directed to the points where a regular reader have zero clue -such as massive tax fraud & cold war. Van Allen radiation belt explanation part is fantastic - even a science challenged person (like me) can visualize it.
It's like this - the only read I think is worthwhile re: "aliens" (which I don't believe in) is William Lyne's "Pentagon Aliens" - however, it's not something I would try to hash out here. Too long, too much to explain, too much off the main topic and furthermore, even more controversial than "Anti-Zionism".
Mentioning some issues briefly is fine if relevant to the main issue. Going into great detail requires a whole 'nuther blog.
I am really enjoying reading your well written articles. It looks like you spend a lot of effort and time on your blog. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Agen Ibcbet
Well, I must say, the nonsense I've read here is some of the dumbest stuff I've seen on the internet lately. The moon landing didn't happen? Please. I saw it happen. More importantly, orbiters from 4 different countries have now photographed the markings and equipment left on the surface by the missions. Or is that all fake too? Hollow moon, aliens, conspiracies? You people need to get a hobby, like maybe reading some real science and history.
Saturday, August 16, 2014
You, Americans and citizens of the world, have been hoaxed.
[Image]
I do not believe Apollo 11 and subsequent landings ever happened, for two reasons:
Totally, absolutely, indisputably impossible - logical, scientific, and financial. Not feasible 40 years ago with less computing power technology than the original Nintendo Gameboy.
Van Allen Radiation Belt - extremely potent radiation so lethal it would induce instant death of the cosmonaut/astronaut -- living animal or human -- in accelerated organ failure due to rapid radiation poisoning after exposure, even with the filmsy shields and windows in manned Apollo space vehicles. Diagram.
One question arises - why did the Nixon Administration and NASA pull off the hoax?
There are two possible answers to this.
Massive fraud of taxpayers' money. Not unlike Wall Street bailout, Federal Reserve's reigning 96-year of usury and monetary-economic control in privatized central planning, and theft of trillions of dollars by Neoconservative & secret government conspirators and Israeli Zionists pre- and post-9/11, including annual cost of foreign aid to State of Israel.
Cold War relic. "My penis is bigger than yours" braggadocio towards the now-defunct U.S.S.R. in the intense and contentious Space Race begun by USSR's pioneering launch of Sputnik satellite in 1957 that stunned America and spurred the Eisenhower Administration to create the new sector of the U.S. Government NASA -- National Aeronautics and Space Administration -- in 1958.
Apollo 11 and subsequent manned moon landing missions -- even lunar orbit missions preceding the landing (Apollo 7, 8, 10) -- never happened. It's ridiculously impossible.
How, then, did the astronauts occupy and pilot the space vehicles that were launched into space?
Simple, they only orbited the Earth in the measured distance while within the confine of space away from the death zone of Van Allen radiation belt.
When Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and other surviving Apollo program astronauts claim they landed on the moon, they are safely assumed to be liars and perjurers.
Why is Neil Armstrong a recluse who fights to keep his life private and rarely grants interview (60 Minutes ass-kissing segment in 2005)?
Neil is not humble as the media paint him to be. Neil knows it's a complete sham and a total hoax. That's why, theoretically, he wanted to maintain distance from all the hoopla. The more he lies about the claim on the accomplishment of the moon landing, the tormenting the conscience is for him under threat of harm towards the astronauts and their families if they dare to reveal the "truth."
NASA -- and the U.S. Government as the culprit since the coordinated cover-up of JFK, RFK and MLK assassinations -- perpetrated the greatest scam since Federal Reserve was enacted into law by the treasonous Congresspeople and Woodrow Wilson Administration, along with the 16th Amendment allegedly "ratified," in the year 1913. The majority of America and the West are compelled to believe Lunar Landing happened or be ostracized for being "rebellious," "unpatriotic," and "kook."
Michael Rivero, the webmaster of What Really Happened, has admitted - rather proudly - that he had worked for NASA. He may have made claims on his blog that Apollo programs occurred with the landing as matter of fact. Therefore, his objectivity is out the window.
I reiterate. Manned lunar orbiting and landing never, ever, ever happened. It's a fantastic hoax, one of the greatest of all time.
Don't let the public school history teachers and media propaganda (radio, television, film, literature with piles of books commemorating lunar missions at bookstores) persuade you otherwise, unless you choose to believe that the moon landing did in fact happen.
Here is the gallery of selected clips that show beyond reasonable doubt the American lunar program is a hoax.
Somber, glum, sweaty press conference. Forced to lie under the pressure after completion of orbit near the Earth. Moon is currently at least 238,854 miles on average.
If you laugh at my "conjecture," here's a hit-piece July 13, 2009 New York Times article "Vocal Minority Insists It Was All Smoke and Mirrors" for your reading pleasure. The article cites the professors' and debunkers' attitude that those who claim greater conspiracy in JFK assassination, TWA 800 shot down by U.S. Navy homing missile, 9/11 a total inside job, and President Obama's posted short-form birth certificate fake should be disregarded as kooks subject to public ridicule and prejudice.
What matters to me is nothing but the truth, even if it's disturbing and contradictory to soothing & braggart media and government propaganda, unconventional and wild-sounding.
14 Comments
Close this window Jump to comment formI once believed that the moon landing was a hoax, but years of Seeking have moved me away from that point-of-view.
I now believe that NASA did go to the moon. I also believe that Neil and Buzz found what NASA expected them to find...that others were already there.
The Moon is inhabited on its dark side and within its interior. The Moon is an artificial satellite. This can be proven by realizing that all natural stellar bodies will rotate. The Moon keeps one surface facing the Earth a all times.
That is not "natural".
Neil is sworn to secrecy because he cannot reveal what he saw on the surface of the "uninhabited, inhospitable" rock that we call the Moon.
Our Controllers are extremely cunning. I believe they are the ones who are actually behind the whole "We Never Went To The Moon" movement. Our Controllers are quite happy to have us yell "Fake!" because it diverts us all from the real Truth:
That the satellite known as the Moon is a very busy place.
Thanks for the reminder and I'm quite fond of your blog.
All Love,
~~ G
Monday, July 20, 2009
As for the moon "not rotating":
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=142
I noticed that out moon doesn't rotate as it orbits our earth. Is our moon the only moon in our solar system that doesn't rotate?
Be a little careful . . . the Moon does rotate. If you stood on the Moon, the stars would rise and set, just like they do on Earth, except that a lunar day is a month long, the same as the Moon's orbital period. The Moon rotates at just the right speed so that it always keeps one face pointed toward the Earth, which seems like a pretty big coincidence, doesn't it?
Your question is very interesting because the answer is that, no, the Moon is not unique. Almost all moons in the Solar System keep one face pointed toward their planet. (The only exception we know of is Hyperion, a moon of Saturn.)
Continued at:
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=142
Monday, July 20, 2009
Thanks for giving the enemies of this blog great material to dismiss the posts as both anti-Semitic and crazy.
Whose side are you on?
Monday, July 20, 2009
GB,
Qrswave's discretion whether the post needs to go to salvage WUFYS' reputation. It's not my intention to impugn WUFYS's reputation as a blog for the truth-seeking contributors and audience because of what you term the blog post as "crazy".
If she decides it goes for any reason, then I will re-post on alternative blog and let readers decide what to believe.
Surely there are some WUFYS blogger and long-time 'non-antagonist' readers who still believe Apollo landings happened.
I stand by my belief, without apology and retraction, that manned lunar landings never occurred citing the impossibilities and extremely high risks of completing the mission successfully without fail and death.
Complaint duly noted.
Monday, July 20, 2009
Faked moon landings, creationists, and 9-11 truthers
http://www.examiner.com/x-1051-Independent-Examiner~y2009m7d20-Faked-moon-landings-creationists-and-911-truthers?#comments
Monday, July 20, 2009
Andie531,
Thanks for the clarification on the "rotation" question. Extremely coincidental that one side faces Earth at all times.
Nepos,
As for the Van Allen Belt, I've read that it is only moderately harmful to humans and potentially more harmful to equipment.It's not like astronauts have to bathe in the Belt. They go through it twice during the course of a round-trip.
Hey, we are missing a lot of information. "They" know, while we are left to speculate using available evidence, some of which was manufactured by "them". Our Secret Governments have access to technology hundreds, thousands of years in advance of what we are routinely shown. Earth Beings (not "human" as we know it) freely traveled to the Moon and back during the time of Atlantis. The Russians have bases on the dark side of the Moon, as do sundry and assorted um, "non-Earth-type beings". *smile*
I think the most important thing to remember is that at least we are Questioning.
At least we are Questioning.
~~ G
Monday, July 20, 2009
I agree with Greg that we need to keep this blog more on topic. I'll just leave it at that.
Monday, July 20, 2009
andie531,
What major topics should be the focus?
Israel, Federal Reserve, Wall Street, finance and fraud, human rights, U.S. imperialism, corruption, Iran-Russia, humor (satire), President of the U.S. and other heads of state, media spin, truth and lies, treason, conspiracy theory related to Zionism and cover-ups, personal freedom of thought and movement, Big Brother...
What topics should be excluded from WUFYS as suggested by you and GB?
Perhaps there should be a reader poll conducted so I, among other contributors, will be obliged NOT to post unless approved by qrswave or other administrator upon submitting completed "draft" when the topic post do not meet "criteria" test in order to control the flow of information to make sure WUFYS is "relevant" with sensible on-topic posts.
I have posted on WUFYS (the now-defunct link WUFYS.com and Blogger) on the subject of Nibiru/Planet X, Mormon religion/cult, and now Apollo landing program.
Perhaps I should preface the strange or off-topic post with a fair warning "This blog post do not necessarily represent the view of WUFYS community. It is the author's own opinion so exercise judgment with caution" to avoid the accusation by the antagonists, skeptics and casual readers that WUFYS caters to "anti-semitic and conspiracy theory kooks".
qrswave is welcome to delete the Apollo 11 post at her discretion because it may not conform to the unwritten WUFYS policy that require the topic must be relevant and do not lend to "kooky conspiracy theorist" stereotype.
I already have submitted the identical post on alternative blog in "draft" status until the deletion is established, at which point the post will be re-published.
Anything qrs says, goes. I accept her and/or the assigned blog administrator as a de facto authority. Censorship is not an issue with me if the post in question is not deemed appropriate that does not meet the theme of WUFYS' purpose in the quest for truth in the world of lies and universal deceit.
Monday, July 20, 2009
Since I am the only "official" reader of this blog who post comments here ‘n there, so I will step up...
I will say Nepos’ article was totally on the spot. You've directed to the points where a regular reader have zero clue -such as massive tax fraud & cold war. Van Allen radiation belt explanation part is fantastic - even a science challenged person (like me) can visualize it.
You got my vote.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
It's like this - the only read I think is worthwhile re: "aliens" (which I don't believe in) is William Lyne's "Pentagon Aliens" - however, it's not something I would try to hash out here. Too long, too much to explain, too much off the main topic and furthermore, even more controversial than "Anti-Zionism".
Mentioning some issues briefly is fine if relevant to the main issue. Going into great detail requires a whole 'nuther blog.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
This comment has been removed by the author.
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Ah. Another person who thinks that manned lunar orbits and landings were faked.
If I was you, I would probably want to be spending more time seeing a therapist.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
I am really enjoying reading your well written articles. It looks like you spend a lot of effort and time on your blog. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Agen Ibcbet
Monday, January 06, 2014
Well, I must say, the nonsense I've read here is some of the dumbest stuff I've seen on the internet lately. The moon landing didn't happen? Please. I saw it happen. More importantly, orbiters from 4 different countries have now photographed the markings and equipment left on the surface by the missions. Or is that all fake too?
Hollow moon, aliens, conspiracies? You people need to get a hobby, like maybe reading some real science and history.
Saturday, August 16, 2014