1 – 4 of 4
Blogger tomtom said...

The terrorist group that is partly responsabel is the suggar lobby in Wahington. It is not just the fat what they have taken out of all food, to give it to have some of the lost flavour manufacturers add sugar. Sugar you don't know about. Sugar is btw more addictive than whatever harddrug or alcohol. Someone has a smart deal somehow. You ever checked how many of the super rich are actually over weighted?
People eat the wrong food ( added sugar) and also to much of it, all caused by consumerism and don't forget the rat race with a lack of sleep. I agree that this is off a greater danger than all the terrorists in the world. Would this be a part of a bigger plan? Or is it just shareholders greed?
Amazing isn't it? Who will turn the light out in the US?

TomTom, Fearless Navigator

Monday, April 17, 2006

Blogger Unknown said...

I don't believe in conspiracy theories of more than 10 people (will come out sooner or later) and people have a choice to choose their leaders. If they don't have character/drive to change governments, then they deserve the government they get.

A fat nation cannot rebel. Hunger is one of the requirements. Fat means more than enough to eat, and not enough toil. In other words, relative prosperity. In the olden days, the rich were fat, and gout was the 'duke's disease'.

It is strange how Americans, even the liberal intellectuals, lose track of relativity. It is like the rest of the world does not exist, and the US is not relative to other humans.

While hunger is a curse and conspiracy in parts of the world, being fat is a curse in the US. Give me a break on this one, please.

Monday, April 17, 2006

Blogger Mark Prime (tpm/Confession Zero) said...

“In Indiana, the Batesville Casket Co. calls it "a little extra room for life's final journey."

"Amazing. If the terrorists don't get us, our buttocks will.”

Nice tagline!

Monday, April 17, 2006

Blogger qrswave said...

Akber, the other day I went to a meeting in which the speaker said that conspiracies are as natural to humanity as breathing. Indeed etymologically, conspire comes from the Latin word com- together + spirare to breathe: to join in a conspiracy.

I find his assertion quite reasonable. I think that the term got a bad rap more recently because people conspired to do bad things in secret - hence the enactment of a number of criminal statutes aimed to punish "conspirators" like the Sherman antitrust act, and RICO after it.

Also, it is one of the more difficult crimes to prove. So, I diasgree that it easily comes out in the open. People conspire all the time in boardrooms and business meetings all over the world. But, if the companies are private, you're not going to find out about it without a subpoeana and some tangible, credible evidence that something unlawful is going on. and in the case of some antitrust cases, the only unlawful conduct is the conspiracy itself.

Monday, April 17, 2006

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot