Very good point. I think especially important is your observation of the distinction between violence to property and violence to persons.
Though much property has been destroyed by protestors, protestors have NOT harmed anyone.
In contrast, state actors,i.e., police, have killed over 25 protestors in their effort to protect property.
Sunday, February 19, 2006
Anonymous said...
But what's the real question/issue? The cartoon riots were all obviously contrived for TV effects to stoke Orwellian "perp. war for perp. peace"--same as oligarchal heads of the drug networks fostered the so-called "Muslim" gangs burning 18,000 cars in France just recently, same as Abu Ghraib prison-torture photos were pushed in Muslim's faces by Jews-media.
Okay, and this latest rioting seeks further to set up the next Mossad-CIA "terror-event" like 9-11. (Incidentally, it is now certain WTC towers were destroyed by demolition-explosions as testified to conclusively by hundreds of NYC firefighters, et al., this info only out now since Aug 05, and duly reported upon with analysis by David Ray Griffin in his definitive essay, "Why Official Accounts CANNOT Be True." (Do google search for text.)
Bush and "neo-cons" are truly desperate people, one of the reasons being outstanding Internet and blogging efforts therein and therewith. Keep up the good work. Thor
So what will we do? Aside fm blogging and small detail work (though absolutely necessary) like reversion of Senate elections to state legislatures, as originally, removing present group of criminals, I suspect we need a larger idealistic campaign-movement like Constantine's Christian cultural rev., removing the Jews--but also the "Sadducean" co-conspirators. (For to focus exclusively upon Jews is actually diversionary, the very object of topmost conspirators, like Council on Foreign Relations [CFR], exposited best by JBS.org, I think.) Thor
I CANNOT find this web site that you speak of. "why official accounts cannot be true". Do you have a link? It's very unnerving to think about. I almost hope to find out that this is all untrue.
othersdie, I'll see if I can get an answer for you from Thor. I've never read it.
Monday, March 27, 2006
I had to post this over at kos before someone posts a breaking news story about Muslim protestors, protesting cartoons in Indonessia and more I don't understand the violence over cartoons comments. But I did not post this as breaking news, even if it causes less people to read the diary. Why? It isn't breaking news, it is the result of years of crimes and American govermental and corporate terrorism against Muslims.
Again the MSM gets it all wrong. They talk about violence due to cartoons. However, the cartoons were in Denmark, so why is the US Embassy in Indonesia being stormed? If this is about Danish cartoons then why are they burning U.S. flags and images of Bu$h and not Danish flags and images?
Perhaps because this isn't about cartoons. As the protestors stated
"They want to destroy Islam through the issue of terrorism ... and all those things are engineered by the United States," and ""We are fighting America fiercely this time," he said. "And we also are fighting Denmark."http://www.msnbc.msn.com/...
Notice how this is aimed at the US. Denmark is the afterthough.
Additionally, it is important to draw a distinction between violence against property and violence against people. Flag burning, burning images of Bu$h is part of the first amendment, not violence as the MSM article mislabels it.
Meanwhile many children and adults too around the world continue to die as a result of governmental and corporate terrorism from the United States. Yet their pleas for help are ignored.
It goes something like this:
A kills 1000 people and damages some property B kills 10 people per day over 5 years
6 Comments
Close this window Jump to comment formVery good point. I think especially important is your observation of the distinction between violence to property and violence to persons.
Though much property has been destroyed by protestors, protestors have NOT harmed anyone.
In contrast, state actors,i.e., police, have killed over 25 protestors in their effort to protect property.
Sunday, February 19, 2006
But what's the real question/issue? The cartoon riots were all obviously contrived for TV effects to stoke Orwellian "perp. war for perp. peace"--same as oligarchal heads of the drug networks fostered the so-called "Muslim" gangs burning 18,000 cars in France just recently, same as Abu Ghraib prison-torture photos were pushed in Muslim's faces by Jews-media.
Okay, and this latest rioting seeks further to set up the next Mossad-CIA "terror-event" like 9-11. (Incidentally, it is now certain WTC towers were destroyed by demolition-explosions as testified to conclusively by hundreds of NYC firefighters, et al., this info only out now since Aug 05, and duly reported upon with analysis by David Ray Griffin in his definitive essay, "Why Official Accounts CANNOT Be True." (Do google search for text.)
Bush and "neo-cons" are truly desperate people, one of the reasons being outstanding Internet and blogging efforts therein and therewith. Keep up the good work. Thor
Sunday, February 19, 2006
i've just read this
kind of ties in, don't it?
Sunday, February 19, 2006
So what will we do? Aside fm blogging and small detail work (though absolutely necessary) like reversion of Senate elections to state legislatures, as originally, removing present group of criminals, I suspect we need a larger idealistic campaign-movement like Constantine's Christian cultural rev., removing the Jews--but also the "Sadducean" co-conspirators. (For to focus exclusively upon Jews is actually diversionary, the very object of topmost conspirators, like Council on Foreign Relations [CFR], exposited best by JBS.org, I think.) Thor
Sunday, February 19, 2006
I CANNOT find this web site that you speak of. "why official accounts cannot be true". Do you have a link? It's very unnerving to think about. I almost hope to find out that this is all untrue.
Monday, March 27, 2006
othersdie, I'll see if I can get an answer for you from Thor. I've never read it.
Monday, March 27, 2006