1 – 5 of 5
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A finite supply of money only creates wealth through velocity- how fast dollars are exchanged and passed around. Hence the eternal need for new markets and more cheap crap. Doesn't interest dampen this velocity? How much interest have you paid on your interest? How many hands has your dollar passed through where a chunk of it has been siphoned off, to be loaned out again for more interest. How much labor can you buy to supply ever-growing markets, with a finite and interest-hampered money supply? How low can wages go before markets collapse and gov'ts can no longer borrow enough to jump-start their economies? What will happen when the powers-that-be finally have ALL the money? Is there a doomsday scenario? Has it happened before? Just wondering. Cacky

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Anonymous Anonymous said...

ok I think I get it- have to come back and get a new word. I'm not the sharpest tack in the box. I'll retype my questions tomorrow- getting verrry sleepy..... cacky

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Blogger qrswave said...

Cacky, you are precisely on track!

Interest does not dampen the velocity, it accelerates it! The more it costs (in interest) to circulate money, the more is needed to pay (interest) to circulate it! It's like a dog chasing its own tail!

I don't know if this has happened before.

But, I do know that we must stop it before it does more damage.

To everyone out there who reads our comments:

If only for yourself and your family, please spread the word because whether you like it or not, we're all in this together.

If we don't fight this together, we will suffer its consequences together.

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cool.

What said aboout interest dampening the velocity of dollars may reflect my incomplete understanding. I see what you mean about inerest acccellerating the NEED for velocity. It strikes me that if people were unencumbered by crippling inerest (gov'ts too) their purchasing power would be much higher and dollars woulld circulate faster and more freely in the productive areas of the economy- goods, labor, services. This dollar velocity would create wealth where it was earned and where it is most needed and deserved, rather than just feeding the financial sector at a whirlwind pace. And you are right. As structured, that pace can never get fast enough; it can only impoverish those who serve it because those who control it do not share a commom goal of a healthy, wealthy society. What happens to a king who starves his subjects? The current system is institutionalized to the point of seeming unassailable. cacky

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Blogger qrswave said...

Bingo!

Please, spread the word!

God bless!

Sunday, November 13, 2005

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot