tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9880373836357334522009-02-20T17:17:16.639-08:00Supreme Court BloggerSupreme Court Bloggerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09851435002304383430noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-988037383635733452.post-34015009414671927142007-04-11T14:45:00.000-07:002007-04-11T16:54:31.787-07:00Welcome to Supreme Court Blogger<strong><span style="color:#cccccc;">.<br /><span style="color:#000066;">THE HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL 5-4 GLOBAL WARMING CASE IS IN!<br />Supreme Court Blogger looks at the facts, the court's analysis, and the dissent's arguments thoroughly, making sense from a particularly confusing and disorganized decision. Beyond that, the blog tries to explain why this decision is unusually convoluted, and provides some unique legal analysis. </span><a href="http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/"><span style="color:#000066;">http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/</span></a><br /><br /></span>Supreme Court Blogger</strong> is the site for common language looks at recent supreme court cases. This is the place where the most insightful, both legal, and casual Supreme Court analysis lives. These are not standard "case briefs," although they cover the rulings and the laws behind them.<br /><br />You may leave comments on this site without having to register. Feel free to provide comments, suggestions, disagreements, or other information.<br /><br /><br /><strong><span style="color:#3333ff;">THE CASES:<br /></span></strong><br /><strong>EPA Must Rule on Global Warming,<br />Not Give a "Laundry List" of Excuses; <em>and</em><br />States May Sue The Federal Government<br />to Enforce the Law</strong><br />Massachusetts, et al., v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., April, 2007<br /><a href="http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/">http://massachusetts-v-epa-scm.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br /><strong>International Law That Protects<br />Individual Rights Not Applied,<br />Right To Contact A Home Country Is Undermined</strong><br />Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, June, 2006<br /><a href="http://sanchez-llamas-v-oregon.blogspot.com/">http://sanchez-llamas-v-oregon.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br /><strong>Where The Evidence Used Against A Person In Court Is<br />Not Called "Testimony,"<br />There Is NO RIGHT TO CROSS EXAMINATION.</strong><br />Davis v. Washington, June, 2006<br /><a href="http://davis-v-washington.blogspot.com/">http://davis-v-washington.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br /><strong>There Is No Remedy For A Violation Of The<br />KNOCK AND ANNOUNCE RULE</strong><br />Hudson v. Michigan, June, 2006<br /><a href="http://hudson-v-michigan.blogspot.com/">http://hudson-v-michigan.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br /><br />Note--this blog is being remodeled. Some formatting needs to be redone.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/988037383635733452-3401500941467192714?l=supremecourtblogger.blogspot.com'/></div>Supreme Court Bloggerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09851435002304383430noreply@blogger.com1