tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9832114.post112616393073876500..comments2009-07-12T06:48:07.145-07:00Comments on Orion Reads: kim stanley robinson sucksgood old ohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14454702773523287540noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9832114.post-1143309866423108332006-03-25T10:04:00.000-08:002006-03-25T10:04:00.000-08:00"how about the martians?"Shit."how about the marti..."how about the martians?"<BR/><BR/>Shit.<BR/><BR/>"how about the martian constitution?"<BR/><BR/>Total shit.<BR/><BR/>"how about the realism?"<BR/><BR/>The "realism" wasn't realistic, it was the deranged rants of some socialist hack, and thus complete and utter, soft and squishy, shit.Jason Kauppinenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15412461940757219567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9832114.post-1131341254718468222005-11-06T21:27:00.000-08:002005-11-06T21:27:00.000-08:00i just saw this post. ahem. "one of the crappiest ...i just saw this post. ahem. "one of the crappiest authors going in quality science-fiction today"?? is that even an insult?<BR/><BR/>okay <B>antarctica</B> was shit but how about <B>the martians</B>? how about the martian constitution? how about the realism? okay all the big man stuff was also shit. but do you really need time travel or aliens with all yr sci-fi? i for one get enough sci-fi-drug-lit from p k dick. i find k s robsinson's, um, thoroughness, refreshing.<BR/><BR/>do you think that there is some weird utopian future where no sub committees exist?<BR/><BR/>is this aimed at me? did you deliberately not raise this with me directly but instead choose to publish it in yr blog?grover g grovernoreply@blogger.com