tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8895200797299787815.post-7446752731636818362007-10-05T19:01:00.000-05:002007-10-05T19:01:00.000-05:00I see Michelle Monte has decided to turn her blog into a local National Enquirer. Rumor, gossip, innuendo, and uncorroborated "facts" are her specials of the day. <BR/><BR/>Instead of sticking to issues and the facts, she's rather revel in mudslinging and rumor-mongering. I have heard from several people since Monte started saying only Traska, Becker and Schneider contributed to the retreat, that she is nothing but a bald-faced liar and that all board members took an active role in the discussions. That contrasts with the lying Michelle Monte. Also, Amy Weinsheim's child was extremely well behaved. In fact, you hardly knew she was there most of the time, again, contrary to Michelle "The Great Liar" Monte. <BR/><BR/>Perhaps Monte was getting Weinsheim's child confused with her own. I understand they are rowdy and misbehave. Some of their neighborhood kids have told their parents they don't even want to play with Monte's children because they're so mean and nasty. I guess it's true that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.<BR/><BR/>Isn't it interesting how Monte says on one blog how people should work together as a community and debate issues, not personalities, but then posts nothing but B.S. like she has on her own blog? She is, without a doubt, the very definition of "hypocrite." <BR/><BR/>She has outright lied about Karen Bowen wandering through central offices during the retreat, and even claims someone else saw it. More B.S. from the "queen of crap." Are we to presume that Monte and her other "source" were following Karen Bowen around in the administration building? If so, and if what they've said about Bowen is true, how are they any better? And by Monte's own admission she was in and out of the "retreat room." What was she doing roaming around the building? It's okay for her and her "source" to leave the room, but not anyone else? Shall we make the same kinds of accusations about her? <BR/><BR/>But hey, whilst the "roving reporter" was out of the room, maybe she missed the work Bowen, Weinsheim, Kavanaugh, and McDermott were doing on coming up with a plan. <BR/><BR/>And another thing, first she says four board members contributed nothing, but then she says once Amy Weinsheim's daughter got picked up Amy was able to "get down to work." Hmm, more contradictions from "Story-a-Minute Monte." I have it from several people who were there at various times during the day that, as has been mentioned before, all board members contributed. <BR/><BR/>This is just more of the typical crap we've come to expect from Michelle Monte. She's desperate to serve on the school board and thinks if she can paint her opposition in the worst possible light it will get her enough votes to eventually win. Not a chance in hell of that happening. Too many people know what she stands for (you only have to read her crap or listen to her once or twice to figure that one out) and know that she is not what this district needs.<BR/><BR/>I'm sure this will be met by Monte and her small contingent of bloggers (probably also named Monte) with accusations of people attacking her and her children. Boo hoo!! Her style is and always has been to start a word war, then shake her head in bewilderment about why people get defensive with her. She likes to appear as a professional victim, when in reality she's a professional liar and hypocrite. I advise her to spend less time on the computer and more time at her church, ideally in the confessional. She has much to do pennance for.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com