Marketer Makes a Difference

Corporate Self-less-ness ?

2009-11-02T14:55:00.000-08:00

I have lots of blog post ideas that have not yet turned themselves into blog posts. This post was inspired by a tidbit I ran across and wanted to remember but didn't know how to file the information. Since I think it's pretty cool, I share it with you and preserve it for future reverence and the same time on this blog.

It turns out that Self magazine conducts "Good" research which "which explores women's emotions resulting from the good a consumer perceives she does by purchasing socially responsible products and brands." How cool is that?

The latest research found something very interesting about skepticism (a leading reason companies shy away from cause marketing).

1) Only 16% of consumers meet the magazine's definition of highly skeptical.

2) If you can convince these skeptics, they are actually MORE likely to purchase products from companies they perceive as doing good things.

3) Skeptics are highly involved in supporting causes -- their skepticism comes from caring.

Wow. Maybe this is what is known as "healthy skepticism." To see the full article about it in Advertising Age click Here.

To give credit where credit is due, I paraphrased this little summary from the "Cause Marketing Today" email newsletter by the Cause Marketing Forum.

Something Old, Something New

2009-05-22T12:13:00.000-07:00

Recently, I heard Stacy Joseph, Director of Annual Giving at Dana Farber Cancer Institute, give a talk about “Annual Giving and Best Practices.” It was a great talk. But, before I discuss it I’m going to digress about “annual giving.” I think it’s a terrible term. It’s useful internally for distinguishing between operating funds, campaign donations, and major gifts. The problem is - it’s very “inside baseball.”

At a previous talk, the presenter asked us if we participated in annual giving. I didn’t raise my hand. It’s not that I don’t donate, it’s just that I don’t necessarily donate to specific organizations once a year. I donate when I feel moved and able to afford it. I think a lot of people do that. The term “annual fund” doesn’t resonate with donors. Because I believe in the power of words, I’d say even just using it internally has a bad influence. Plus, it’s really, really hard to keep people from using internal terms with the outside world.

Now that I’ve gotten that rant out of my system, I’ll revisit the issue of the dreaded mailing labels. I wrote previously about my dislike of mailing labels but according to Stacy Joseph, lighthouse mailing labels outperform every other solicitation they’ve tried. Dana Farber is a sophisticated operation, so I’m sure they’ve tested a lot of great ideas. Admittedly, they’re mailing list skews toward an older demographic. If it works, don’t fix it. But they don’t stop there. They started offering eCards not long ago. The minimum donation to send one of their eCards is $5 and according to Stacy, the average donation is $19.

See, eCards really are cool. Do you know what’s even cooler? Ringtones. Dana Farber’s “ Rally Against Cancer” campaign encourages schools to compete to see who can raise the most for the Jimmy Fund. When kids register to be part of the campaign, they can receive exclusive ringtones from the Redsox’ Jon Lester or Joe Catiglione.

Smart marketers like Dana Farber use cutting edge techniques to attract new supporters while continuing to offer the base of loyal supporters what they want, whether it’s cool or not.

How Does Your Garden Grow?

2009-05-07T19:08:00.000-07:00

I’ve been attending a number of seminars, workshops, courses, and the like about fundraising. They all talk about the importance of “cultivation.” That’s a lot more than just asking for money. You’re not likely to raise very many funds from people who have never heard of you or your cause. All of the experts I’ve heard stress the importance of seeing fundraising as relationship-building rather than managing transactions (one-time gifts).

Just like a garden, once you’ve done proper cultivation the next step is stewardship. The Association of Fundraising Professionals defines “stewardship” as “a process whereby an organization seeks to be worthy of continued philanthropic support …” Really? Fundraising is the “sales” of the nonprofit world and often has some of the same negative stereotypes. Just like a professional sales force, when done well fundraising is much more than “show me the money.” The definition continues “… including the acknowledgement of gifts, donor recognition, the honoring of donor intent, prudent investment of gifts, and the effective and efficient use of funds to further the mission of the organization.” Wow. That’s a tall order.

So, when it is time to ask, especially for serious money, what do you do? Some of the best advice I’ve gotten so far was not from an instructor, but from a fellow class mate. She works for MIT and told me they have a saying that goes “If you want advice, ask for money. If you money, ask for advice.” That intuitively makes a lot of sense. If you ask for money without first establishing trust, you’re likely to get some unsolicited advice on what you should be doing with that money. What she didn’t say (but I believe she meant) was - when you ask for advice, even though you are hoping for money, you have to respect your donors opinion and sincerely want advice. Being open to insights from your constituents and respecting your donors is all part of “being worthy of continued support.”

This is Amost Brilliant!

2009-04-23T10:12:00.000-07:00

I got very excited when I saw an email from the American Cancer Society titled "Who is the official sponsor of your birthday?" Brilliant! I had to open it. The Cancer Society has started a new campaign to be the "official sponsor" of birthdays - reminding people that every birthday is a victory over cancer. In the email there was also a link to this web page:

http://www.morebirthdays.com

Guess what it has ... ecards! Yes! Just what I was asking for! There's also a YouTube and Facebook tie in. Brilliant! Unlike the cards and address labels I get in the mail from various causes that have little or no tie to the cause, these cards are a little too much about the Cancer Society for my taste. They probably won't replace my use of Hallmark.com anytime soon. I would prefer a happy medium. So maybe this is just short of brilliant.

I'm not sure where it goes from here. There was is no obvious way to donate if I chose to use an ecard. I might actually be more inclined to send the ecard if it included a message saying I made a donation in the recipient's name. Perhaps the lack of focus on donations was intentional. It could just be a list-building activity. When I gave them my birthday to add me to the list of 13,103 birthday's they are sponsoring, they invited me to give them my friends emails so they could get sponsored too. Then I got an email thanking me for joining and saying "By joining the movement for more birthdays, you are helping save lives by creating a world where cancer can’t steal another year from anyone’s life." I'm not sure how telling them when my birthday is helps fight cancer. I'm thrilled if it does. I'll keep you posted on my experience with my new birthday sponsor.

Just 'Cause

2009-04-15T11:31:00.000-07:00

I know it’s been a while, but I’m still intrigued by this year’s Academy Awards. It wasn’t the awards themselves that caught my attention, it was the ads. Oscar night ads don’t attract as much attention as Superbowl ads (the awards ceremony had a mere 36.3 million viewers compared to 98.7 for football). But with that much audience it has become another opportunity for advertisers to show off some of their best work. And, I noticed these ads were very different from those at the Superbowl. To me, that says the advertisers believed that different people watch each event (I happened to watch both). Or at least they expect the viewers to have different motivations.

For example, the most popular ad from this year’s Superbowl was a Doritos ad featuring two guys in an office hitting someone in the groin with a snow globe. At the Oscars, the most advertised snack was True North nut snacks (owned by the Frito Lay division of Pepsi Co). They aired mini-documentary spots about people doing good. They were great stories but I wasn’t sure what they had to do with nuts.

True North wasn’t the only one trying to increase the value of their brand by borrowing from the good work of others. Diet Coke spent a bundle on ads with Heidi Klum to promote women's heart health and the American Heart Association. I didn’t learn anything about women’s heart health and didn’t understand what it had to do with Diet Coke.

Don’t get me wrong, I am all for creating win-win promotions between corporate America and the non-profit sector, often called “cause marketing.” And, I was impressed that in this climate when so many companies are cutting back sponsorship and advertising, there was so much money being spent showcasing causes. But, I wonder what benefit these companies realized and how they justified the expense.

Cause marketing doesn’t have to involve expensive campaigns with Fortune 500 companies. Not long ago a brilliant, small-scale example appeared in my mail box. It was a mailing from The Gary Rosenthal Collection announcing the Art Tzedakah Box Contest. To decode that for you, Gary Rosenthal is an artist that produces a line of Judaic art and a tzedakah box is a coin bank for collecting money for charity. The artist is giving away $5,000 in prizes to causes based on the creativity of people who design tzedakah boxes in the shape of their cause. It’s targeted, it gets people involved with the brand, and it’s “viral.” I sent a link to this website to two people and I’m not even Jewish! It’s not just plucky artists that use this kind of approach, Virgin Atlantic gave away money to promote their launch in the Boston Market. It was not quite as creative or targeted as Rosenthal, but it was interactive and viral. I might not have even noticed Virgin otherwise. So, I think even in a tough economy cause marketing isn’t going away. Like all good marketing, it needs to be targeted and meaningful.

Going 2.0

2009-03-31T13:00:00.000-07:00

I actually don’t like the term “Web 2.0” but it’s convenient short hand. I’ve decided it’s about time I integrate my nonprofit marketing-related efforts with the online networking tools I use. So, I’ve created a Linked-In group for Marketers Making A Difference, Boston. All those marketers who come together to help Boston-area nonprofits once a month can now network online whenever they like. I also converted the old-fashioned, 8-page Word document that contains all the nonprofit marketing-related resources I’ve collected into a series of links on Delicious (which I just discovered is no longer Del.icio.us – when did that happen?)

Whew! I feel more modern already.

Address Labels Are So Last Century

2009-03-31T08:12:00.000-07:00

Since October 2008 I have collected 51 pieces of direct mail fundraising solicitations. Seven of them (14%) have included address labels. One of them was from my alma mater, Indiana University, but the rest were from organizations I don’t have a relationship with and the labels generally don’t have an obvious relationship with the mission. What’s worse, they don’t bother to say why I should send money. Usually they just send the labels and a reply form. (See the example from the American Heart Association below.)

There is a commonly held belief that if you send someone something they will feel obligated to reciprocate and your response rate will go up. However, I think that in today’s economy you need more. If you send me something I didn’t ask for and don’t want and you don’t even try to make an emotional connection with me, I don’t feel compelled to send you money. Even if I do send a small amount on impulse, I’m not likely to be a loyal donor. As a group, nonprofits have a dismal track record in retaining donors. More than once I’ve seen my meager donation used up with a series of expensive mailers sending me more and more stuff I don’t want.

Specifically address labels and cards. I used to use the labels for bills but then I switched to online bill paying. I don’t send cards or letters to friends except at Christmas time. I do send ecards. I’m a big fan of Hallmark’s ecards and I send them for friend’s birthdays or just pick-me-ups. If a nonprofit with a mission I care about offered me an ecard, I might pay for that. I would be highly likely to use it for free and perhaps one of my friends would donate. I’ve never been offered an ecard. Perhaps it’s because these organizations seeking money from me don’t have my email address. Well, if they sent me a direct mail piece telling me about their ecards, I just might give it to them.

A quick Google search turned up three sources for ecards ranging from $500 to $5,000 and up. I cannot endorse any of them, but include them here to illustrate that they’re not hard to find:

IncentiveXT

Thoworlds

Convio

I’m not saying ecards are a panacea. The point is that many organizations are relying on outdated tactics that show a lack of understanding of the needs of their audience. It’s time to start thinking creatively about what people want now.

Improve Your Status

2009-02-19T18:31:00.000-08:00

I’ve attended a few presentations on “Web 2.0” or “social networking” and the like and are usually disappointed. I’ve even blogged about how awful these things are. Tonight I attended a meeting titled “Social Networking – Using Technology and the Web as a Highly Effective and Low-Cost Ways to Recruit Volunteers” presented by Laura Briere, CEO and Founder of Vision Advertising.

Laura stressed the importance of updating your status on sites like Linked-In, Facebook, and Twitter on a daily basis. This is a good way to stay top-of-mind with your network and reinforce your reputation as someone who is active, fun, and up to something important. You can even use it to invite people to events or to check out your website. But, who has time to update all those different sites? The solution is my favorite new tip from Laura – Ping.fm. This site allows you to update all those other sites in one place. Of course, it doesn’t tell you what to say. You still have to figure that out on your own.

Sometimes, It's Better to Take Your Best Guess

2009-02-13T15:17:00.000-08:00

In my last blog post (which was an embarrassingly long time ago) I talked about the importance of market research to nonprofits. So, you can imagine my excitement when the University of Michigan Alumni Association sent me an email saying they want to know what I think. I was actually looking forward to taking the online survey and felt a little pride at what a sophisticated alumni association I belonged to. Well, pride does go before a fall. What a disaster it turned out to be! Yuck!

It started by showing me various pieces of mail and asking me to rate my likeliness to open each one. It then asked me to rate how appealing I found one particular envelope. (There was no option for I couldn’t care less about your stupid envelope.) Then the fancy software program asked me to highlight in green the parts of the envelope I liked and highlight in red the parts I didn’t like and then explain each one. It didn’t get any better from there. It was only my researcher’s curiosity that kept me going to the end of the survey.

They didn’t really care what I thought about my alumni association, they just wanted to know the best way to sell to me. From having implemented direct mail programs myself, I know that expert direct mailers experiment and test every possible detail from the color of the envelope to the stamp to the greeting and more. By sending a slightly different package to different segments of the mail list they learn what works and what doesn’t. It’s an expensive, laborious process that is hard to get right. So I can sympathize with anyone wanting to short cut the process. But this project was ill conceived from the beginning for two key reasons:

1. While it’s true, for example, that a blue envelope may get you more donations than a yellow one, it’s not because people have well thought out opinions about the color of envelopes. It seems to me that these decisions operate on an irrational, sub-conscious level. There’s plenty of research that shows people are not good at accurately predicting their own behavior.

2. More importantly, every communication you have with your constituents, including surveys, influences their opinion of you. If you tell me that you care about my opinion and ask me to spend my precious time answering your questions, you'd better be asking me about something that I care about or I’m going to wonder why you’re wasting my time.

Yesterday, I attended a workshop on “Fund Development” with a consultant named Simone Joyaux that I really enjoyed. She talked about a lot of things but the theme that came up time and again was that most development efforts do things backwards. They are focused on themselves and not on the donors. It seems that “donor-centered” organizations are as rare in the nonprofit world as “customer-centered” companies are in the corporate world. This acutely myopic project shows that my alma mater is no exception. (Simone would not be surprised; she’s a rabid Michigan State fan.)

The next time I get a survey from U of M, I’m still likely to take it because I am a freak who collects surveys as a hobby. But I wonder how many other alums will be less likely to open their U of M emails after this experience.

Why Not Just Ask?

2008-09-27T09:07:00.000-07:00

There is a lot of talk of borrowing for-profit marketing tactics to promote nonprofit causes. Not everything the corporate world does is transferable, but many organizations have benefited from applying marketing expertise in nonprofit settings. One of the most-valuable and, sadly, least-borrowed marketing tactic is market research. For example, Marketers Making a Difference met with Cambridge Cares About AIDS to discuss their new name. I’m not announcing any spoiler, I don’t actually know the new name. We helped them think through how to launch their new identity.

One of their chief concerns was how to choose a name that matches their current and future identity without alienating their most important historical supporters. I asked if they had asked their key supporters for input on the new name and they said they had not. What a great idea? Why not ask your most influential supporters for their opinion? You will probably end up with better ideas and you make your key supporters feel important.

I think that nonprofits overlook this kind of opportunity for input all the time. Market research can be a long, complicated, and expensive project or it can simply be making a few phone calls. Don’t be afraid to pick up the phone. Nonprofits have an advantage over corporations in that your constituents are much more likely to want to talk to you. You already have a head start. If you want to get some “quick and dirty” input, here are some pitfalls to avoid:

* Sample bias – don’t assume that all constituents are alike. Some input can be worse than none at all if you talk to only a few people and assume that they represent everyone. Think about who you are talking to and what segment of your constituents they do and do not represent. Use your one-on-one conversations to develop theories that you can test on a wider audience.

* Interviewer bias – the answers you get can be influenced by who’s asking the questions. It’s human nature to want to avoid hurting someone’s feelings or to look important in front of other important people. So, if you want input on your volunteer programs, you might not want your director of volunteer administration asking all the questions.

* Ignoring input – if you’re going to start asking for input, be prepared to use it. This doesn’t mean you have to do everything someone tells you to, but it does mean you have to be prepared to hear and respond to news you may not like. Also, take credit for it when you do make a change in response to constituent feedback. Make sure your supporters know you are being responsive.

Be Careful What You Ask For

2008-07-23T19:29:00.000-07:00

I was recently talking with a small, grassroots organization working on affordable housing. (Affordable housing in Massachusetts? What a concept!) He told me about his public relations nightmare. He circulated a press release about rising housing costs. A reporter from the local paper called and but didn’t want to talk to him. The reporter wanted to interview clients from member agencies that were directly impacted and he needed the contacts that same day. Unfortunately, grassroots guy was taken by surprise. He didn’t have any such contacts lined up and had to scramble to get some or risk loosing the story opportunity. Unfortunately, the person he was able to get on such short notice had a skeleton or two in the closet and made for an unfavorable story.

It’s easy to see how a grassroots organizer who is the head of public relations, volunteer coordinator, fundraiser, chief cook, and bottle washer could be caught off guard. But, for anyone who is experience in working with the media, this situation was completely predictable. If you’re going to court the press, you have to be prepared for success. With respect to this story, this means two things:

Lesson 1: If a reporter calls you, he or she will always be on deadline. That means you will have a very narrow window of opportunity to respond. If you don’t give them what they need in time, you could loose the story. What’s worse, they will remember your organization as unresponsive and may not consider you at all for the next story opportunity. The good news is that if you are well prepared you will be remembered as a reliable source and it will give you an edge over competing sources of news. First, the journalist’s schedule is not a mystery. Daily, Weekly, and Monthly publications all have their own rhythms. Many publications produce a media calendar and some of them list story deadlines. You can also just contact the publication and ask, probably the editor. They appreciate it when you try to make their life easier. Second, be available. Make sure they have your cell phone or pager number and return calls right away. Also make sure other key players in your organization are ready to respond promptly.

Lesson 2: Journalists don’t want to write about just dry facts. They want someone to quote and the closer to the center of the story the better. That often means they won’t want to talk to you. If they are writing about a lack of affordable housing, they will want to talk to someone who was directly affected by a housing crisis. Before you send a press release, think about who the journalist may want to interview and try to get them lined up in advance.

These two lessons aren’t all there is to know about working with the media, but if you take them to heart you will definitely improve your odds.

Good News/Bad News

2008-07-18T11:15:00.000-07:00

At the intersection of the “enlightened self interest” of newspapers, corporate sponsors, nonprofits, and entrepreneur Greg McHale comes a new online service called “good2gether.” This service offers a platform for nonprofits to enter information about their cause, events, volunteer opportunities, etc. Through good2gether’s partnerships with media outlets like local newspapers, this content makes it way next to articles on their websites. For example, if there’s an article in The Boston Globe about heart disease, content from the American Heart Association could display right next to it. The service launched in June on Boston.com (the website for The Boston Globe) and is rolling out nationwide. Currently, more than 1,600 nonprofits from across the country are signed up.

What’s in it for the media partners? Well, it’s common knowledge that most “news” is bad news. When people read about a problem that engages them emotionally they want to know what they can do about it. People become frustrated being presented with all problems and no solutions. The nonprofit content offers solutions to the problems raised in news stories and makes readers feel better about the publication. But what really catches the media’s attention is the income potential. The “Do Good Channel” where the nonprofit’s information is displayed on their site can be sponsored by corporations looking to enhance their image or promote their Corporate Social Responsibility programs. Newspapers are hurting and this new source of income is really what catches media outlets’ attention.

What’s in it for nonprofits? Well, if you’ve already got all the website traffic and media coverage you want, maybe nothing. Otherwise, it could be a valuable way to attract more supporters among people who are interested in the topic (or they wouldn’t be reading the related article). The service is free, but does require a time commitment. Just like a website – the more fresh, compelling content you add the more it will do for you. Right now it may look like extra work but if it’s as successful as Greg McHale says it will be, it could actually save time in the long run. For perspective, my friend Lori Tsuruda, president of People Making a Difference, likes to compare the job of keeping online volunteer postings current to playing the carnival game “Whac-A-Mole.” Just when you think you’ve got them all updated, another one pops up. If good2gether infiltrates enough media outlets, you could enter all your organization, volunteer, event, and related information in one place and have it appear in multiple outlets. McHale has a good track record. He’s also the founder of cMarket – the online auction service for nonprofits. So, he just might make it huge. If not, Good2gether still offers a low cost way to spread your message.

The good news is, even if you never use this service, there are a couple of important lessons to take from it. The bad news is, it’s easier said then done. Lesson 1: Meet people where they are. If you’re trying to get attention, talk to people about what interests them. Be current. Be relevant. Too many organizations are essentially talking to themselves in their external communications. Also, look for opportunities to reach people at a time and place where they will be open to hearing your message. McHale calls this being “discoverable.” Lesson 2: Offer good news with bad. In other words, don’t be depressing. Any time you talk about a problem, let people know what you’re doing about it. Even if the situation is bleak, present a ray of hope.

Leader in Email Marketing Doesn’t Do Email Marketing

2008-06-17T11:44:00.000-07:00

I went to a panel discussion last week about email marketing strategies. When the Chief Marketing Officer of Constant Contact was asked about subject lines and increasing email open rates she replied “I don’t know how to get attention with email. We don’t use it.” Which struck me as odd because (1) Constant Contact is arguably the most recognizable name in email marketing and (2) if she’s not an email marketing expert, why was she on the panel?

I think I have an answer for mystery #1. I’m still not sure about #2. As a leader in email marketing, Constant Contact has very strong opinions about how it should be used. From their standpoint, it’s for relationship building, not for acquisition. So, when she said they don’t use it, she didn’t mean they don’t ever use their own product. They use it to distribute a “Hints and Tips” e-newsletter, for example. They just don’t rely on it to attract new business. Instead they use pay-per-click advertising, banner ads, and a lot of education (Webinars, in person seminars, etc.).

It’s refreshing to see a successful business with a powerful tool that isn’t using it to hammer everything in sight. Email isn’t new anymore, but thanks to companies like Constant Contact, it is a newly available tactic for millions of small businesses and nonprofits. The hammering is getting pretty loud. For example, the 2008 eNonprofit Benchmarks Study found that on average the nonprofit partners in the study sent more than four emails per subscriber per month. If I try hard enough, I can think of reasons why a constituent might want four or more emails per month, but they certainly don’t apply to everyone.

For another example, look at your inbox. Another of the panelists, Michael Katz from Blue Penguin Development, pointed out that when he started his business writing email newsletters the biggest objection he heard from potential clients was that their customers didn’t use email. Today, the biggest concern is that their customers already get too much email. His suggestion was to pick a very narrow subject and speak to a narrow audience so you know you’re newsletter gets to the top of the pile.

Here are some suggestions from me:

1. Before planning an email marketing campaign, ask yourself what you want to accomplish and if email is the best way to do it.

2. Before you launch your email campaign, be sure it’s integrated with all your other communications – website, letters, phone, in person, etc. Although there may be many people from different departments involved on your end, from your audience’s perspective you have one relationship, one personality and all your communications should reflect that understanding.

3. Before writing email content, ask yourself what your audience wants. The more the email is about them and the less it’s about your agenda, the more likely it is to get read.

Happy emailing!

Is There Too Much of a Good Thing in Mass?

2008-06-03T19:58:00.000-07:00

Last Friday I attended my first meeting of the Nonprofit Consultant’s Network (formerly CNEN). Geeta Pradham, Director of Programs at The Boston Foundation, gave a little preview of a soon-to-be released study on the financial health of the nonprofit sector. The full report will be released on June 11 at The Boston Foundation’s event “Passion and Purpose – Raising the Fiscal Fitness Bar for Massachusetts Nonprofits.” From what I saw, the news is not good (especially for someone like me looking to land a job in this sector).

I’ve heard it said many times before that Massachusetts has a very high concentration of nonprofits (14% of employment, vs 7% nationally). I’ve even heard it said that the number of nonprofits in Massachusetts has grown to an unsustainable level. Unfortunately, The Boston Foundation’s analysis of more than a decade’s worth of 990 data may support this grim conclusion. More disconcerting than the doubling in the number of nonprofits since 1989 is the trend of revenues not keeping up with spending or even inflation.

After the presentation of preliminary results, there was a lively discussion among the attendees of the possible causes, effects, and solutions to challenges facing this sector. Here are some of the highlights:

Lack of investment in capacity and infrastructure. (This discussion reminded me a bit of my economic development background and all the debates about what a community needs to be supportive of start ups.)

Where will the leadership come from (or who is to blame)? Board of Directors? Major funders? Consultants? What about the constituents being served?

Concerns about the rush to rely on consolidation. Mergers should be done for mission fit, not just financial necessity and nonprofits need to learn to cooperate more effectively.

A human resources gap is expected as experienced professionals retire. (This one I liked as I’d like to solve that problem for someone.)

The sector is so broad and complex, how can you make any generalizations about it?

How can you indeed. We'll see what the numbers have to say on June 11.

Taxation and Representation

2008-06-01T10:54:00.000-07:00

The New York Times recently published an article called “Tax Exemptions of Charities Face New Challenges” about local, state, and even federal governments questioning the tax-exempt status of nonprofit institutions. The article claims the tax-exempt status of charities costs local governments $8 billion to $13 billion annually. I’ve always found estimates like this very dubious. It doesn’t take into consideration any of the benefits nonprofits provide. Besides, if local governments all flipped a switch and took away the tax exemptions tomorrow, it’s not clear that they would get all that money. It’s not like the private sector always pays taxes either. For the promise of more jobs and sales tax revenue, large corporations can negotiate tax abatements and even tax payer funded financing and capital improvements. One retailer, Cabela’s, relies so heavily on this strategy they had to put a disclaimer in their annual report, according to this article.

The New York Times story centered around a court case in Minnesota where a daycare center was deemed not charitable enough and will now have to pay property taxes. However, there are plenty of examples closer to home. With Massachusetts facing a budget crisis, tax-exempt nonprofits are getting closer scrutiny. State legislators are considering imposing a 2.5 percent annual assessment on universities with endowments of more than $1 billion, like Harvard’s which has reached $35 billion.

But it’s more than just an issue of budget shortfalls. As nonprofits strive to be more “business-like” and create more consistent revenue streams with earned income, there is growing confusion over what it means to be a nonprofit. What does this have to do with marketing? Well it’s really a branding question. What does the nonprofit brand mean? How is a nonprofit daycare center or hospital different from its for-profit counterparts? Lots of questions, no simple answers.

For example, I pay what I consider to be a ridiculous amount of money (even with insurance) for mostly adequate medical services. Until I got a fundraising letter in the mail, I did not know the clinic where my doctor practices is a nonprofit. At that point, it was too late for them to define their brand with me. Corporations spend billions on their brands and yet brand identity isn’t really determined by a color, or slogan, or ad campaign. It’s the sum of experiences your audience has each time they encounter your brand – each client, employee, donor, etc. Ultimately, you don’t define your brand, your audience does. So what can an organization do? Set an easy-to-understand target and make sure everything it does is consistent with that brand identity. That's easier said than done. Marketing is hard work.

There is still a question of whether the nonprofit community can, or even should, have a cohesive brand identity. How much does a small, volunteer-run, start-up have in common with a large, hundred-year-old hospital or university? I’m keeping my eye on the Massachusetts Nonprofit Network. One of the stated goals of this new organization is “Build the public image of the nonprofit sector … to increase the valuing of our sector and its clients by the general public, policy-makers, and the state legislature.” It will be interesting to see how that effort unfolds.

Get A (Second) Life

2008-05-28T20:12:00.000-07:00

I attended TechSoup’s NetSquared Conference today in Second Life about the launch of the Nonprofit Commons 2. If that sentence doesn’t make any sense to you, don’t worry. I’ll explain. Up until now, I have been avoiding Second Life - an online virtual world where you can meet people, shop, fly, do lots of fun stuff. It took me years to get over my computer game addiction and I don’t need another distraction from my job search. But now I find that nonprofits are using Second Life to spread their message, fundraise, and even fulfill their missions “in world.” I had to check that out.

It was a “mixed reality” event, meaning that the live conference was occurring in California while in Second Life our avatars were observing the panel discussion and participating in a virtual tour of the new Nonprofit Commons afterward (this is actually the second one). TechSoup, an organization that offers free and discounted software and technical expertise to nonprofits, manages both Nonprofit Commons and offers nonprofits free, virtual office space. The panel discussion featured some of the tenants.

There were some technical difficulties getting the sound to work so we missed the first half of the panel. I was having plenty of technical difficulties of my own. I just joined Second Life this morning and had a lot to learn. Once you create your avatar, you are taken to “Help Island.” There you can learn about your new virtual life and there are helpful volunteers to answer your questions. In my case, there was also a Romanian man who wanted to chat me up. I didn’t have much time for help or chatting because I had to get to the conference. Unfortunately, once you leave Help Island, you can’t go back. So, if I want to continue using Second Life, it will involve a lot of trial and error. My avatar, Carin Finesmith, stood throughout the presentation because I couldn’t figure out how to make her sit. Fortunately, she’s in better shape than I am and didn’t find it too taxing.

Here’s what I learned from the three speakers I heard:

First was Jani Myriam, founder of the Transgender Resource Center (TRC). She talked about how Second Life (SL) was a safe, anonymous place for her to explore gender issues in a way that was not safe in the “real world” and eventually lead her to make substantial real world changes in her life. Jani saw a need and a solution so she created the Transgender Resource Center as a way to provide support to transgender people in Second Life. They now have 800 members, so they must be doing something right. Jani mentioned it’s a much more affordable way to be a philanthropist than the real world (there’s no way she could afford office space in the Bay area). Other important benefits for a first-time philanthropist were access to resources and training from TechSoup and connections with other nonprofits. As far as I can tell, TRC only exists in SL. That’s one model that works well for a very specific population.

The next speaker was Jessica Dally from Community Voicemail (CVM) – very much a real life organization that provides voicemail services to people in crisis. CVM was introduced to the possibilities in Second Life through their major technology partner, Cisco Systems. Apparently, Cisco has a large presence in SL. Jessica mentioned it was helpful that she had some personal experience with SL because it’s not easy to jump into. (I was thinking “yeah, you can say that again.”) She said the biggest advantage was making connections with other nonprofits. They can’t have an office in every city, so they rely on partnerships with other nonprofits on a local level. She also mentioned the opportunity to meet people you wouldn’t otherwise (like the CTO of voice solutions for Cisco). This model was very interesting to me. I figured that people who don’t have access to voicemail also don’t have access to Second Life. But CVM isn’t using SL to connect with those they serve. This was a great way to make and strengthen partnerships.

The last speaker was Rik Riel from Global Kids. This is a 20-year-old nonprofit for teens in New York City, so it definitely pre-dates Second Life. SL allows them to reach new populations of teens – outside New York, with disabilities, even a group of incarcerated teens. Because they serve teens, it’s not surprising that Global Kids has some of the most creative uses of SL and the most seamless combinations of SL and real life. They also are active in more than one virtual world, but Rik didn't talk much about that. Global Kids sees Second Life as a virtual place to promote real-world change. They have a program called “Dream It, Do It” where teens can propose projects to benefit their community, find funding, and manage the project. They also hold a lot of events in SL, including a live simulcast of Kofi Annan receiving an award from the MacArthur Foundation and trials from the International Criminal Court with lawyers providing running commentary for context.

Lastly, Rik answered a question that had been buzzing in my head – what about the kids who don’t have internet access. Global Kids is working on a project called “Switchboard” that allows users to exchange SMS text messages with people in the virtual world. The first test case they are planning involves teens in a refugee camp in Chad. How cool is that?

Rik’s slides are available at Slideshare. I looked at them so I could see what I was missing since I couldn’t get the presentation to work. Like all good Powerpoints (there are so few of them) the slides weren’t much use without the presenter. However, coincidentally (or not) I found on the Nonprofit Commons wiki a white paper titled “Best Practices for Non-profits in Second Life” from Global Kids which looks pretty good. I intend to read it soon.

Lastly, I got a magic carpet ride tour of the Nonprofit Commons. It is home to dozens of organizations from all over the world – too many to list here. Some, like Giving Circles, I had never hear of and others, SPCA are well known. It’s not just about information exchange, our tour guide mentioned that Kiva, which provides micro-loans, has a tip jar in their office that raises real money. The International Humanities Center acts as a fiscal sponsor for small organizations without 501c3 status. I may pay them another visit for Marketers Making a Difference. Also unique to SL is Garden For The Missing. It’s a virtual garden which displays posters of missing persons. All missing persons posters are clickable so that you can read more about their disappearances. There were also a few art galleries, hang gliding, canoe rides, sky diving, and a swimming pool. I feel a new addiction coming on.

A Tale of Two Universities

2008-05-22T17:46:00.000-07:00

I am an alumna of two universities – Indiana University and University of Michigan. Now that I'm making a career in the philanthropic sector, I have a new perspective on the correspondence I receive from these institutions. I collect fund raising appeals the way I used to collect surveys when I was heavy into market research. I think Michigan is doing a much better job of cultivating me as a future donor. Here’s why:

Indiana: To entice me to send a donation, IU sent me address stickers. I like them and I use them, just like the ones I get from the Paralyzed Vets and WWF. I don’t send money.

Michigan: I just got a letter containing a “printer’s proof” of the Investor’s Report which contains the names of everyone who gave $100 or more. Guess what, there’s still time for me to make a donation before the final printing! And, there’s a matching gift challenge. That’s clever. I’m not going to give until I’m employed again, but I bet this works on lots of alumni.

Indiana: IU sends me mail addressed to me and my dead, ex-husband. I think he was added to my record several years ago when we attended an alumni event in Bloomington. I never understood why they have to put his name on every piece of mail. He never went to school there. I sent back one of their reply forms asking them to remove him, but it did no good. I think I occasionally get a glossy publication from the business school, but the vast majority of the mailings are fundraising appeals. The IU Foundation used to call me. I worked at the Foundation for a while, so I always tried to be nice to the students calling me. They haven’t called in years. If they did, they might learn why I don’t give anymore.

Michigan: U of M sends me a wide variety of correspondence, both from the University and from the School of Business, via mail and email. I also get emails from the local alumni chapter. They send fundraising appeals, but also alumni news and occasionally very targeted communications that are extremely relevant to me – like an email from the dean of the business school explaining our ranking in U.S. News and World Report. That’s news every MBA wants to know.

Indiana: I went to an alumni event one year at IU. It involved a football game and a very nice dinner reception. It was fun, but it didn’t enhance the value of my degree. Let’s be honest - no one in Indiana cares about football and there’s no way they could have gotten a block of basketball tickets for non-season ticket holders. It’s certainly not why I went to school there.

Michigan: The U of M business school puts on a reunion every year that includes a one-day conference with great speakers. Last year Dr. Maya Angelou gave the keynote. I used to attend every year when I lived closer. Oh yeah, there’s also an opportunity to go to a football game if you like.

Time Management

2008-05-22T17:37:00.000-07:00

I thought I had today planned perfectly. I had an appointment for coffee with a networking contact at 10 a.m., then a Women in Development (WID) meeting nearby from 11:30 – 1:30, then a visit to Associated Grant Makers (AGM) to do some research. All-in-all a very productive trip into Boston. My plan started to unravel just before I left the house this morning when I realized that pre-registration was required for the WID meeting. So that was out. Then, my 10 a.m. was a no-show and I was stuck in downtown Boston until noon when the AGM library opened. Ugh.

Time for plan B. My first meeting was in Third Sector New England's NonProfit Center. They donate space for Marketers Making a Difference meetings. So, I decided to stop by the TSNE's office and say ‘hi’ to the program director. She wasn’t in, but I ran into the communications director instead. She asked me to write an article for their newsletter. Great! My first bit of good luck for the day. Then, I sat in Starbucks until AGM opened and read a book about transitioning to the non-profit sector.

From this I learned (or re-learned) the following:

1. Always pay careful attention to the registration instructions the first time you see the meeting notice. (I got an F)

2. Always confirm appointments a day ahead. (I got an F)

3. Always have a plan to make good use of extra time. (I got a B)

What’s So Mysterious About Web 2.0?

2008-05-21T13:38:00.000-07:00

Every time I see an event listed about “Web 2.0,” especially if it’s “Web 2.0 for Non-Profits” I think I should be there. I seem to believe that there is some great and secret knowledge out there about how to use the Web that I’m missing. Granted, I’m not an expert or I’d be giving these presentations, but every time I go to one I mostly discover that there is no magic answer and I already know more than I thought.

Such was the case with yesterday’s “Web 2.0: New online tools that are transforming Nonprofits” presentation at Nonprofit Net. (For those not familiar with Nonprofit Net, it’s a volunteer-run organization in Lexington, MA with a seminar series for small non-profits.) The presenter was clearly knowledgeable, but did not understand his audience. My guess is he’s used to talking to techies. The presentation was fairly academic and philosophical, answering questions like “What about Web 2.0 is evolutionary vs revolutionary?” Audience members who came hoping for concrete suggestions they could take back and implement were largely disappointed.

I did pick up a couple of interesting pointers. For instance, he suggested that parent organizations with regional chapters could use RSS to aggregate news from each of the chapters on their website. That’s clever. He also mentioned an open source CRM system for non-profits called CiviCRM. That could come in handy. Lastly, he mentioned a “Grassroots Use of Technology” conference on June 28, 2008 in Lowell. That may be too techie for me, but I’ll keep an eye on it and I may go.

Just because yesterday’s presentation didn’t have a lot to teach me, doesn’t mean I don’t have a lot to learn. Today’s marketing majors are taking college courses in “Social Media.” I need to keep up. Here is an article I found on del.icio.us about it (Web 2.0 props to me for finding it) and here is an article about Web 2.0 Nonprofit Success Stories. And the journey continues …