tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-34273718796389557172008-02-22T14:41:00.000-08:002008-02-22T14:41:00.000-08:00Here's a small question to ponder. Is the creation of a National DNA database a good or bad thing? <BR/><BR/>On the plus side, in theory it could be used to capture criminals who leave DNA evidence at crime scenes and possibly result in a reduction in crime through a combination of increased efficiency and increased realization by criminals they're more likely to be caught and put on trial. It would also allow for greater ease in identifying bodies and John/Jane Doe situations where the person has no identification on them when found (either alive or dead).<BR/><BR/>On the minus side... oh, where shall I begin? In theory it's possible to "plant" DNA evidence, especially once 3-dimensional ink-jet printers become more accurate. Thus cops could illegally create evidence to nab the person they want to get. Also in theory a DNA database could be used by insurance companies and the like to determine if someone is at risk for various diseases and then refuse to provide them with insurance benefits. Work places could likewise refuse to hire someone due to medical possibilities. And there is always concerns it is a violation of civil liberties.<BR/><BR/>Thoughts?<BR/><BR/>Rob H.Roberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07678539067303911329noreply@blogger.com