tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-85155124341771270192008-04-14T04:55:03.711-07:00Cheryl J. WeissmanCheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-87309172854010369302008-04-14T02:53:00.000-07:002008-04-14T04:53:01.656-07:00MilestonesAs we inch ever closer to the 15th anniversary of the day this firm began, I find myself thinking again about how it began. I wish it was an impressive story, filled with detail about how I wrote a detailed business plan, did many hours of research, painstakingly created a list of potential clients, prepared eloquent marketing material, etc. In fact, I did none of those things.<br /><br />I had been working as an account manager for a company that sells fundraising software. The company, like most companies, had gone through some ups and downs during the 5 1/2 years that I was there, and my fortunes there had also gone through some ups and downs. The last "down" came at the end of 1992, when my manager left to take another position and they closed the Chicago-area office and moved me to a sales position. Four months later... well, to be blunt, I quit in a huff after a conversation with the company president to which I took exception.<br /><br />I gave two weeks notice and used that time to decide what to do next. I loved working with nonprofits, so I thought about ways that I could continue to do that. Work for a consulting firm? Go back to fundraising? Find another software company? Nothing felt quite right, but some tiny part of my brain was saying that I could do what I had been doing, on my own.<br /><br />Work for myself? Set rates that did not have to cover a lot of overhead? Choose to work with clients in whose missions I believed? Be able to set standards for service that I felt clients deserved?<br /><br />It sounded better and better...<br /><br />So I took a look at my financial situation. No savings, and if I included my final paycheck, vacation pay, a little bit from a 401(K), I figured that I had enough to live on for six weeks. Ideal for a business venture, right?<br /><br />Okay, I thought, I'll give myself six weeks to generate enough work to support myself. When I run out of money, I'll get a "real job".<br /><br />I was very lucky. I got a few contracts right away and I had a built-in base of prospective clients, people who had worked with me over the last 5 years who knew me and liked the way I worked.<br /><br />And so, incredibly, on May 15th CJW will celebrate its 15th anniversary. And I will celebrate the fact that I still don't have a "real job". <br /><br />This is not a job. It's a labor of love.Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-55919166863288655352007-12-08T11:16:00.000-08:002007-12-08T12:37:48.665-08:00ClarityI will always remember 2007 as the year of absolute clarity.<br /><br />In the late-1980s, I attended a workshop put together by the customer service manager at the software company for which I was working. He based the workshop on a book called "The Strategy of the Dolphin", which is one of those "Who Moved My Cheese" kind of books that was advocating dolphin-like behavior as the way to succeed in business. I still remember the quintessential quote: "The dolphin says, 'I want us both to win, and to win elegantly and resoundingly, no matter the difficulty or the time it takes.'" Or something like that.<br /><br />More importantly, the manager talked about part of the dolphin strategy being to "find your bliss" -- find work you truly love and believe in. <br /><br />I found my bliss in 1984 when I went to work for a nonprofit in Chicago, in the Development office. When I left there in 1987, it was to work for a company who provided fundraising software to nonprofits. In 1993 I left that company to start my consulting firm, offering software-related services to nonprofit organizations.<br /><br />So -- for nearly 24 years I have been helping nonprofits make effective use of software resources. I hope to continue to do this until I retire to the California wine country in my dotage (because somehow I know that I will still love sparkling wine in my dotage.)<br /><br />Fast-forwarding a couple of decades, I entered 2007 knowing that near the end of it, I would turn 50. The first time this occurred to me, I shrugged my shoulders and had another sip of champagne. But the thought would not go away and seemed to demand some kind of action on my part. From there, something else took over.<br /><br />I thought perhaps I'd have a party and ask friends and family to make gifts to a nonprofit instead of getting me anything. Then I had to decide on a nonprofit for which to request contributions. I knew it should not be one of our clients, so I was weighing other options when more powerful forces took over.<br /><br />I had an opportunity to discuss a work project with an organization in Washington DC. I flew there for a day and arranged my travel schedule so that I would have a little free time to visit the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.<br /><br />The previous blog entry will tell you what I found at the Museum and how I left there having decided to ask for gifts for the Museum, and to make my 50th birthday a celebration of memory. <br /><br />I spent much of the summer and fall planning a party -- space was offered to me, I found a caterer, prepared invitations, compiled a list of invitees, tried to explain to my family what I was trying to do. The usual stuff. The invitations went out at the end of October, with the party scheduled for December 1, 2007.<br /><br />My available time in November was spent thinking about this party and how to celebrate and honor memory. One of the ways I wanted to do this was the prepare some presentations that would run throughout the evening.<br /><br />Ultimately, I prepared three presentations. One was about the US Holocaust Memorial Museum; one was about my family and friends, many of whom attended the party; and the third was about our clients.<br /><br />It was as I was writing the client presentation that everything fell together in one of those moments of clarity.<br /><br />At the Holocaust Museum, I had listened as Elie Wiesel spoke about the importance of memory; about how forgetting means the end of everything. And I had been moved to tears by his words, because I thought about how nonprofits preserve and protect culture, civilization, humanity -- all that Elie Wiesel said would be lost if we are allowed to forget.<br /><br />Writing the client presentation, seeing the names of all the organizations we've worked with since 1993, and thinking about my conversations with people at these organizations, I remembered myself saying these words again and again: Institutional Memory.<br /><br />Software is an organization's memory.<br /><br />And so I found myself writing these words:<br /><br /><strong><em>Our work is about memory: We help organizations create,maintain and use data as institutional memory.</em></strong><br /><strong><em></em></strong><br />Elie Wiesel is a truly amazing man who found a way to survive the holocuast and dedicate his life to protecting humanity from the dangers of indifference. Forgetting leads to indifference, and we cannot allow people to forget. Elie Wiesel is a holocaust survivor, a Nobel prize winning author, a scholar, a professor. <br /><br />I am none of those things. Yet in my own very small way I contribute to the preservation of the collective memory.<br /><br />I have always understood that this is important. I have always valued knowledge, memories and information for their own sake.<br /><br />Now, poised to turn 50 in a few hours, I know why.<br /><br />Clarity.<br /><br />If you are interested, the presentations are available for viewing on our website. If you return to the home back and follow the link for the Accidents and Inspiration Benefit, there are links to all three presentations at the bottom of that page.<br /><br />If you feel inspired to make a gift to the Holocaust Museum, please make your check out to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum and send it to me at CJW Consulting &amp; Services, Inc, 8331 Central Avenue, Morton Grove, IL 60053.<br /><br />I will happily send you a personal thank you along with wristbands saying "Never Again" and "Celebrate Memory" -- and I will pass your gift along to the Museum who will send you an acknowledgment for tax purposes.Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-11750382874683770822007-09-03T10:00:00.000-07:002007-12-08T05:47:30.371-08:00Indifference and RemembranceA few months ago, I flew to Washington DC for a meeting. I had a couple of free hours, and I spent them visiting the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. As I was wandering around, I was drawn to a small bank of personal computers.<br /><br />I found a link to a podcast on the Museum's website, a portion of an interview with holocaust survivor and Nobel Prize recipient Elie Wiesel. Mr. Wiesel was speaking about an incident in San Francisco not long ago when he was accosted by a holocaust denier. The man rode in an elevator with Mr. Weisel, followed him off the elevator and grabbed him in the hallway.<br /><br />While the attack left him physically unharmed, the incident led Wiesel to reflect on a recurring theme in his work, which he calls "the perils of indifference." Here's an excerpt of what he had to say:<br /><br />"That person attacked me—okay?—and we were already outside the elevator and he tried to pull me into his room. And I began shouting, literally howling. I've never heard myself howl like that—"Help, help, help." I must have shouted for three minutes. Not one door opened. Then when I went down to the security people, and they said, "Maybe three people called us that they heard your shouts." Three—there must have been 20, 30, because it was 6 in the evening—6, 7 in the evening—but not one door opened. So how can you not feel discouraged?"<br /><br />"What I make of that? Indifference, you know. I fought all my life against indifference. Yes, at least three of them called, but even they didn't open a door. That is painful. That means, what have I done with all of my work? Trying to wake people up."<br /><br />"Even in moral terms, morality means concern for the other, not for oneself—the other."<br /><br />"In order to feel empathy and compassion for and with a person who is alone, suffering, in desperation, it's only because we remember others who were alone, suffering, and in despair. It happens that not only one person, but the group may forget."<br /><br /><strong><em>"Forgetting means the end of civilization, the end of culture, the end of generosity, the end of compassion, the end of humanity</em></strong>."<br /><br />"And therefore I celebrate memory, and I try to strengthen it. And I believe—I still do, in spite of everything—that memory is a shield. If we remember what people can do to each other, then we can help those who tomorrow may be threatened by the same enemy."<br /><br />Mr. Wiesel's words struck a deep chord in me. I have spent nearly half my life working for and with nonprofits: organizations who work ceaselessly to protect civilization, culture, compassion and humanity; organizations who depend on the lack of indifference and the generosity of others.<br /><br />Then and there, I decided that I wanted to use the occasion of an upcoming "big" birthday to ask for gifts to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, located in Washington, DC. In case you're not familiar with it, here's a short blurb from their website (<a href="http://www.ushmm.org/">http://www.ushmm.org/</a>):<br /><br /><em>A living memorial to the Holocaust, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum stimulates leaders and citizens to confront hatred, prevent genocide, promote human dignity, and strengthen democracy.</em><br /><em></em><br />This organization embodies Elie Wiesel's work, <strong>which is dedicated to protecting your work</strong>.<br /><br />Between now and December 9th, I will be collecting gifts for the Museum, with a goal of raising $10,000 to support their education, remembrance and conscience program areas. If you would like to contribute, please make your check payable to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum and send it to:<br /><br />CJW Consulting &amp; Services, Inc.<br />8331 Central Avenue<br />Morton Grove, IL 60053<br /><br />If you prefer not to be acknowledged by the Museum, please indicate on the reference line of your check that you'd like to remain anonymous.<br /><br />If you prefer, you may send your gift directly to the local museum office:<br /><br />US Holocaust Memorial Museum<br />PO Box 1852<br />Highland Park, IL 60035<br /><br />If you choose this option, please indicate that this is a gift for Cheryl Weissman's <strong><em>Accidents and Inspiration Campaign</em></strong>.<br /><br />Thank you for your support!<br /><br /><em><span style="font-size:85%;">If you would like to comment on this post, please click the word "comment" below</span></em>Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-60854725965701905902007-07-01T13:39:00.000-07:002007-09-05T12:10:43.664-07:00How Much Is Not Enough?A couple of months ago I was trying to figure out an affordable way to help a group of interested professionals get an introduction to The Raiser's Edge, a software product for which training is available only if you work for an organization that uses it.<br /><br />While I was not able to offer a free session, as I initially hoped to do, I did find that I could offer an online seminar for a very reasonable $40 per person, and the CJW webinar series was born.<br /><br />Since that first session at the end of May, we have led three webinars: Interfacing and reconciliation between Development and Accounting offices; Raiser's Edge Export Functions; and one about what it takes to get a job as a support person in a Development office. There are 6 more scheduled during the month of July, and we will be adding others to be held in August and September within a couple of weeks. Each session is 90 minutes long. Registrants are given a web link to view the webinar and a toll-free number to call in order to hear it and be able to participate.<br /><br />I thought long and hard about the price for these sessions. I get emails inviting me to webinars frequently, including those from Blackbaud, who is offering 3-hour sessions priced at about $240 per person. My sessions are half as long as those Blackbaud is offering, so at half their price I'd be charging $120 per person, which is pretty much in line with what I'm seeing from other companies offering such services.<br /><br />I know that it can be dangerous to price services too low. There's all that "if it seems to good to be true it probably is" and "you get what you pay for" stuff hanging in the air around a low-priced opportunity. But as this firm is very small and our overhead is kept as low as possible, our rates have consistently been lower across the board, although I'm confident that the quality of our services meets or exceeds our competitors. I've never liked the idea of charging more than I felt I needed just because I could.<br /><br />What do you think? Would you invest $40 and 90 minutes? Would the low price be off-putting to you? If $40 is too low, what do you think an online seminar is worth?<br /><br />I'd like to ask that you go to the Events/Webinars page of this web site and review our offerings. Then come back here and tell me what you think about the webinars and the prices.Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-14468134865872653532007-05-28T16:06:00.000-07:002007-11-24T13:50:43.827-08:00In Loving MemoryToday is Memorial Day. Like many of us, I have had many reflective moments during this long weekend. I’ve read lists of fallen soldiers in the newspaper and thought of all the men and women still in harm’s way, and I’ve prayed for them and their families.<br /><br />I’ve also thought a lot of people closer to me that I keep close in memory. My grandfather, Nathan, who died in 1989. My grandfather’s namesake, my nephew Nathan, who was born in 1990 and died less than two years later. My grandmother, who died in 2001 at age 87.<br /><br />And Edward.<br /><br />I first saw Edward in April of 1984. He was kicking a photocopy machine. I had just started a new job in the Development office of a Chicago social service agency. Edward was the Executive Director’s assistant and was in the midst of preparing materials for a board meeting. The copier was not cooperating.<br /><br />Over the next few months, we became friends, eventually the closest of friends. He became a surrogate brother to me, and Rosalie, who was his fiancée when I met her and became his wife a few months later, and is still my dearest friend.<br /><br />Edward left our agency about a year after I arrived, and went to work for Children’s Home and Aid Society of Illinois. He started in the Development office as staff liaison for the Women’s Auxiliary and ended his career there in 1993 as the Director of Development. He left because he was not able to work any longer, and he died a year later, after a three and a half year battle with brain cancer. He was 41 years old. He left behind a loving and beloved wife, two beautiful daughters who were just shy of their second birthday, a mother and many treasured friends.<br /><br />Edward was a lot things, and among those things he was the best of the best of fundraisers. Although I know that he was successful and met or exceeded his goals, I don’t have facts and figures to tell you about – I don’t know how many dollars he raised, how many donors increased their giving, how many new donors he acquired. But I know these things:<br /><br />He genuinely loved his work and understood its importance<br /><br />He saw the importance of the organization’s mission at all times<br /><br />He respected everyone with whom he interacted<br /><br />He truly wanted to help make the world a better place – and he did<br /><br />It was not because of Edward that I followed the path that I took. I fell in love with fundraising and nonprofits when I went to work for one, when I finally found that my work could be about more than putting money in other people’s pockets.<br /><br />But it is in part because of Edward that I have continued on the path. Like every job, mine has its ups and downs. I work very hard and very long hours, and I frequently sacrifice time with my husband, my family and friends to “take care of business.”<br /><br />For all this time, even today, nearly 13 years after his death, I think of Edward and feel a renewed commitment to my work.<br /><br />Our work at CJW helps fundraisers do their work – it’s a small part in helping them be what Edward was to CHASI. I often say that I feel privileged to have been able to serve the nonprofit community for such a long time. This is why.<br /><br />I honor Edward with my work. I remember him, today and always.lCheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-13253755772264967132007-05-18T07:24:00.000-07:002007-05-18T07:31:19.628-07:00Failure To LaunchAlthough we are a consulting firm, it’s not uncommon for us to do real work at client sites. Today I arrived early at a Chicago university where I replaced a staff position 8 years ago – I’m actually the senior person in the Development office here now. <br /><br />For the past 11 months, in addition to managing the software used for Development and Alumni Affairs, I have been filling in for the gift entry operator who retired at the end of May, 2006. I had two free hours this morning, and I was on a mission -- I came in do some gift entry and acknowledgments. <br /><br />I taxied out of the house on time, got my engines started by booting up my computer, and then…. Failure to launch.<br /><br />As Murphy’s Law dictates, there has been a power outage in the server room, and the server on which my application resides is down. There is a delicious irony in the fact that when the server has no power, I also am powerless – I can figure out most any software issue that comes my way, but hardware… not my department.<br /><br />In a university setting, there are generally larger issues that create hardware problems, because there is so much more hardware. But for smaller nonprofits, hardware problems tend to come from lack of planning and budgeting.<br /><br />When we talk to nonprofit professionals about implementing software solutions, one thing we always encourage them to think about it the issue of ongoing budgeting for technology. When you buy fundraising software, for example, it’s very likely that you will pay annual maintenance in the amount of 20-25% of the purchase price of the software (unless you license software or use an on-line solution, in which case you will pay monthly for the life of the application.)<br /><br />There is more to consider than just software support, though. It’s the job of software vendors to continue to develop and improve their products. Because it’s likely that this development is taking place using current technology, you need plan to keep up.<br /><br />The older your hardware gets, the more likely it is that your software performance will be affected. And many nonprofits are just not in a position to suddenly have to replace their entire network of computers.<br /><br />To avoid this scenario, plan ahead: budget to replace some percentage of your hardware every year. Try to budget to replace your server at least every 3 years.<br /><br />We work with many software applications, and many of them work perfectly well on older technology. But I don’t think that many of us can afford to count on that, because if we do, when the day arrives that our technology does not support our software, we’re as powerless to be productive as I am with my downed server this morning.Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-39668981739691491822007-05-08T23:06:00.000-07:002007-05-08T23:07:45.460-07:00Living MemoryI told myself that I would not post to this blog more than once or twice a month, but I had an experience tonight that changed my mind. I went to see a special performance of The Diary of Anne Frank at Steppenwolf Theatre in Chicago. Tonight’s event was a collaboration between Steppenwolf (www.steppenwolf.org), the Ravinia Festival (<a href="http://www.ravinia.org/">www.ravinia.org</a>) and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (<a href="http://www.ushmm.org/">www.ushmm.org</a>). In the playbill, the artistic director’s story of the decision to produce this play included these words:<br /><br /><em><strong>The people who hold the event of the holocaust in living memory are passing. It becomes attendant upon all of us to remember and to educate our next generation to the memory.<br /></strong></em><br />Theater can keep memory alive in a very personal way, and that is invaluable. Having seen tonight’s performance, I want everyone to see it because I don’t know how anyone could see it and not be moved, not be changed by it. But I was struck anew with the little piece of preservation of which I am a very small part.<br /><br />The living memory of the holocaust will pass, as will the living memory of 9/11… of Apartheid… of every human tragedy. The living memory will pass, inevitably, yet we will remember.<br /><br /> Nonprofits understand the importance of remembering. Here in Chicago, for example, a few weeks after Anne Frank leaves the Steppenwolf stage, James Conlon will lead the Chicago Symphony Orchestra this summer in the works of Alexander Zemlinsky as part of the “Breaking the Silence” series highlighting music that was suppressed by the Third Reich.<br /><br />It’s been said that those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it. Nearly every Jewish temple I pass has a large sign in front – “Never Again”. We cannot afford to forget.<br /><br />For those who do not have access to theater or museums or concerts, there is another way.<br /><br />Technology – seemingly the most impersonal of tools – keeps memory alive.<br /><br />For many people, software is boring or geeky; technology is alien or geeky; the internet is frightening or… okay, geeky. I’m willing to stipulate that there is a geek component here. I’m even willing to stipulate that there’s really nothing “sexy” about software, unless of course you are a self-described geek. Software is nuts and bolts. And we need nuts and bolts to build on. CJW Consulting is really about making sure you have the right nuts and bolts to do your building.<br /><br />Building on the nuts and bolts allows you to do so much more. Every web site begins with nuts and bolts. Tonight, a director from the US Holocaust Memorial Museum spoke before the performance, and she mentioned a recent exhibit at the museum about the writings of Anne Frank. And she mentioned that you can still see the exhibit – online.<br /><br />The internet will keep alive the memory of the horror that was the holocaust, and so much more. Software archives will keep alive Anne Frank’s writings, and allow millions worldwide to see it and be touched… and remember. Imaging software will allow people to see these historical documents and photographs. All from nuts and bolts made up of 1s and 0s.<br /><br />It’s a lot to take in. I believe that if there is to be an end to the insanities that humans inflict upon one another, it will come about largely from the work of the nonprofit community. And I believe that it will come with the help of technology, bringing us all closer to one another.<br /><br />By the way – software also allows you to buy tickets or books online. Go to the Amazon.com website for a copy of The Diary of Anne Frank, or find a production to see. Do both, if you can.<br /><br />Never again!Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-91864592417928262882007-05-08T07:20:00.000-07:002007-05-08T07:29:55.909-07:00The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly<span style="font-family:arial;">May tends to be a period of looking forward and back for me, as it is a month marked by anniversaries. Saturday was my 7th wedding anniversary, and May 15th, 2007 marks the 14th anniversary of the founding of CJW Consulting & Services and the beginning of our 15th year serving the nonprofit community. And it was somewhere around May 1, 1984 that I began working at a nonprofit in Chicago, where I was asked to investigate fundraising software and the journey that led me here began. (I’d love to say I was six years old at that time, but I’m pretty sure that wouldn’t fly.)</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">When I started working in a Development office, our fundraising data was maintained on a Texas Instruments mini-computer which had removable 5 megabyte hard drives. It was a common occurrence to have to change drives before you could save a record or document, as the removable drives were forever filling up. We were also using a dot-matrix printer and an Accounts Receivable software application – not exactly custom-made for the needs of fundraisers.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">While it was challenging and rewarding for me to make this software do things it was not designed to do, it was far from an ideal situation.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">It felt like a dream come true, 18 months later, to have a personal computer with a 10 megabyte hard drive and a daisy wheel printer, along with software that had been designed for fundraisers. Sure, reality occasionally intruded. The daisy wheel printer, for example, was not quite all it could have been. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">(Daisy wheel printers were similar to electric typewriters. Instead of the metal ball containing letters and symbols found in typewriters, the printers had a plastic “wheel” – a small circle with spokes attached to it. It used continuous-feed paper which we would load into the printer and arrange so that it would fold neatly as letters were printing.)</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">I will forever remember the day that I was processing nearly 700 letters to people who had been invited to an event and did not attend. The first sentence of the letter began “We are so sorry that you were not able to attend…”</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">I queued up the paper, edited the letter text for typos, got the print job started and as soon as I verified that the paper was folding properly as the letters were fed through, I left the room knowing that the printing would take several hours, so I could take care of other things elsewhere.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">When I went back to check the print progress 2 hours later, I found that the spoke containing the lower case letter “T” had broken off the daisy wheel, so I had several hundred letters which began, “We are so sorry ha …”</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">The fundraising software also had a few quirks that I needed to learn as I went along. For example, in my training, I learned that you could assign shortcuts to values for Prefix and Suffix. To save time, I assigned a shortcut value of “1” to the Prefix “Mr. and Mrs.” and manually added that value to over 2000 records. Then I realized that the software had built values for salutation that used the shortcut instead of the translation: “1 Weissman, instead of Mr. and Mrs. Weissman.”</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">Ah, those were the days…</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">After all the months I had spent longing for a fundraising software application and a better, faster printer with nicer-looking output, I was thrilled when we got those things… That is, of course, until I wanted more and better, which happened almost immediately.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">It’s the technical equivalent of the American Dream.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">As soon as you can do more than you could before, you’re going to want to do more than you can now. That’s a given. The only real question is whether or not your software can keep up.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">We’d love to hear from you about this issue. Is your software keeping up with your needs? Are there things you’d like to be able to do that seem impossible with your current technology? Things you need to do but can’t, due to software or cost limitations? Do you have software stories – good or bad – that you’d like to share?</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">To leave your thoughts, click on the “comments” link at the bottom of this post. We’ll publish as many as we can.</span>Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515512434177127019.post-81235176974549558782007-04-22T13:17:00.000-07:002007-04-22T15:16:12.993-07:00Beginning the Blog<p>Before deciding to start a blog on the CJW website, I did some research – I went to the Wikipedia site (<a href="http://www.wikipedia.com">www.wikipedia.com</a>). After reading the “blog” entry, I determined that a CJW blog would be a good thing, but I knew I didn't want a vlog, a linklog, a Phlog, a moblog, and I especially didn't want a Splog.</p><p>A visit to Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, will tell you what all those things are. When you get to the reference to “phlog”, there will be a link to take you to the definition of Gopher Protocol so that you'll not only know that “phlog” is a type of blog hosted on the gopher protocol, you'll also know what the Gopher Protocol is.</p><p>Wikipedia is a great resource. For those who haven't already visited this site, I'll let them introduce themselves:</p><blockquote><strong>Wikipedia</strong> is a multilingual, web-based, free content encyclopedia project. Wikipedia is written collaboratively by volunteers from all around the world. With rare exceptions, its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet, simply by clicking the edit this page link. The name Wikipedia is a portmanteau of the words wiki (a type of collaborative website) and encyclopedia. Since its creation in 2001, Wikipedia has grown rapidly into one of the largest reference Web sites on the Internet. </blockquote><p>Here's the part I like best:</p><blockquote>Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, which has created an entire family of free content projects. On all these projects, you are welcome to be bold and edit articles yourself, contributing knowledge as you see fit in a collaborative way. </blockquote><p>This incredible resource, which is increasingly becoming the go-to reference point for millions of people all over the world, one of the top 5 visited websites anywhere, is supported by a non-profit organization.</p><p>The Wikimedia Foundation (<a href="http://www.wikimedia.org">www.wikimedia.org</a>) website home page begins this way:</p><blockquote><em>Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.</em> </blockquote><p>Is there a better example of the concept of Philanthropy as Community?</p><p>I recently joined the board of AFP Chicago, the local chapter of the Association of Fundraising Professionals. Our vision statement embraces the idea that philanthropy builds community:</p><blockquote><em>The Association of Fundraising Professionals—Chicago Chapter will be valued as the indispensable professional development resource for fundraisers, and by the broader public as Chicagoland's leading champion of philanthropy as a force for building community. </em></blockquote><p>Lest you think that this is a concept unique to AFP, a Wikipedia article on Philanthropy contains this paragraph:</p><blockquote>Some believe that philanthropy can be a means to build community by growing community funds and giving vehicles. When communities see themselves as being resource rich instead of asset poor, the community is in a better position to solve community problems. </blockquote><p>Nonprofits build, strengthen and support communities large and small, and philanthropy provides the resources for them to do it. Philanthropy as community? Definitely!</p><p>Software as community? Maybe not so much. But software is a hugely valuable tool. You can't build a house without a hammer, and you can't build a development program without information about donors and prospective donors. I've always contended that there is a natural marriage between software and fundraisers, despite the reality that fundraising is extremely personal and the perception that software is completely impersonal.</p><p>And again – software runs Wikipedia, a website operated by a nonprofit that wants every single human to be able to share in the sum of all knowledge.</p><p>If you haven't already, take a spin through Wikipedia. Type in pretty much anything in the search box and see what comes up. As I have been writing this, I've looked up the name of the town in which I grew up (Skokie, Illinois), my high school (Evanston Township High School), the Chicago neighborhood which contained the hospital in which I was born (Edgewater), the name of Agatha Christie's first book (The Mysterious Affair at Styles), and Matthew Garber, the 8-year-old who played Michael Banks in the film version of Mary Poppins in 1964 (sadly, I learned that he died at age 21 of hepatitis.)</p><p>Here are some things that I couldn't find in Wikipedia:</p><p><strong>DonorPerfect</strong> or the company that sells it, <strong>Softerware<br />Results/plus</strong> or the company that sells it, <strong>Metafile Information Systems Exceed</strong> or the company that sells it, <strong>Telosa Software, eTapestry, Tessitura</strong> (there is a listing for Tessitura, which is a musical term, but it does not reference the software), <strong>Donor2, </strong>… any listings for fundraising software or the companies that provide them except <strong>Blackbaud</strong>.</p><p>The information is out there, of course. You can Google fundraising software and get 4,150,000 hits (I just did that). You can visit sites like TechSoup and see if there is a forum for whatever product you are interested in. If not, you can start one.</p><p>Or you can come here.</p><p>Your comments will direct this blog to a large extent. Let us know what you’d like to find here, and as long as it relates in some way to software and nonprofits, we’ll do our best to get it to you. </p>Cheryl J. Weissmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09905644812801747360noreply@blogger.com