tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-58011929808646166662008-07-25T22:35:00.000+01:002008-07-25T22:35:00.000+01:00"Anonymous said... <BR/>How silly,no the line projectedfromthe border is at an angle,not straight out and still delivers 90percent of the stuff to scotland. <BR/><BR/>Scots law already applies by virtue of internationallaw.if youmurder your mate out their you appear in the high court in Edinburgh<BR/><BR/>I love it when the English get upset likethis and resorttomaking things up.<BR/><BR/>July 25, 2008 7:07 PM"<BR/>***********************************<BR/>I don't think you quite grasped my point, but so it goes. <BR/><BR/>Incidentally, I am not upset but rather pleased at the turn things are taking - except that it seems, in some quarters, to lead to the substitution of childish insults for rational argument. <BR/><BR/>I ought to have explained that the switch from a NE/SW line to a E/W line actually loses about 80 per cent of 'Scots' oil. Thus, Scotland could not afford to become independent (if its economic assumptions include getting most of the - dwindling - supply of oil).<BR/><BR/>Perhaps your case (whatever it is) would be clearer if you were to adopt conventional grammar, punctuation and spelling. A shame you are unable to meet such standards, for almost all the other Scots I have had dealings with have been products of a superior educational system and were cultured and civilised human beings.<BR/><BR/>Sorry to turn hoity-toity, but you make the temptation irresistable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com