tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8180498216869726946.post-53847159228491530822008-03-11T06:12:00.000-07:002008-03-11T06:30:29.993-07:00<a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_oW-tNsb0CZ0/R9aGGjBAHII/AAAAAAAAAF0/IslJqkZ1vY0/s1600-h/hillglee.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5176472268745743490" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_oW-tNsb0CZ0/R9aGGjBAHII/AAAAAAAAAF0/IslJqkZ1vY0/s200/hillglee.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><div>Former First Lady and former Democratic presidential frontrunner <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton </strong>continues to advance the notion that she, and not Democratic rival <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, will be "ready to lead on Day One," and cites her "35 years of experience" as proof to back up her claims. And let's face it: the evidence is pretty compelling. Given her eight years of experience in the White House, <em>who else</em> could <em>possibly</em> be ready on Day One to host a White House lunch? </div><div> </div><div>Return to <a href="http://seespanrun.com/">See Span Run</a></div>Sue D. Nimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04184967982088304683noreply@blogger.com