tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-81719553376389115052008-06-13T11:00:41.168-04:00ForNowForNownoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-67246115536811212632007-05-16T10:27:00.010-04:002008-05-03T16:07:21.813-04:00The Green Algor Cult<table align=right><tbody><tr><td align=middle><a href="http://www.photobucket.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i82/ForNow_2006/greenalgor7.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket" title="Mystic symbol of the Green Algor Cult and Carbon Credit Investors' Groove"></a><br /><i>Lay down, lay down, lay it all down!</i></td></tr></tbody></table><span style="font-size:130%;"><i>algor, -oris</i> (Latin) <i>masc.</i>, coldness, the cold.<br /></span><br /><b>Websites &amp; Articles</b><br /><br /><i>Link-rich resource for articles, names, credentials, and variety of objections</i><br /><br /><b>U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007</b><br />U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works -- Minority Page, December 20, 2007<br /><a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport">http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport</a><br /><br /><i>Websites</i><br /><br /><li><b>Paleontologist, stratigrapher, marine geologist Robert (Bob) M. Carter's links to his &amp; others' articles</b> <a href="http://members.iinet.net.au/~glrmc/new_page_1.htm">http://members.iinet.net.au/~glrmc/new_page_1.htm</a> </li><li><i><b>surfacestations.org</b></i> <a href="http://www.surfacestations.org/">http://www.surfacestations.org/</a> </li><li><i><b>Watts Up With That?</b></i> (surfacestations' Anthony Watts' blog) <a href="http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/">http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/</a> </li><li><b><i>Climate Audit</i></b> (Steve McIntyre) <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/">http://www.climateaudit.org/</a></li><li><i><b>Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group Weblog</b></i> <a href="http://climatesci.colorado.edu/">http://climatesci.colorado.edu/</a> </li><li><i><b>CO2 Science</b></i> <a href="http://www.co2science.org/">http://www.co2science.org/</a> </li><li><b>Competitive Enterprise Institute: Global Warming</b> <a href="http://cei.org/sections/subsection.cfm?section=3">http://cei.org/sections/subsection.cfm?section=3</a> </li><li><b>George C. Marshall Institute: Climate Change</b> <a href="http://www.marshall.org/subcategory.php?id=9">http://www.marshall.org/subcategory.php?id=9</a> </li><li><b><i>World Climate Report</i></b> (climate change blog) <a href="http://www.worldclimatereport.com/">http://www.worldclimatereport.com/</a> </li><li><b>Science &amp; Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)</b> <a href="http://www.sepp.org/">http://www.sepp.org/</a> </li><li><b>The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition</b> <a href="http://www.nzclimatescience.org/">http://www.nzclimatescience.org/</a> </li><li><b><i>Planet Gore</i></b>, <i>National Review Online</i> <a href="http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/">http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/</a></li><li><b><i>Michael's Blog</i></b>, Michael Asher, at the <i>Daily Tech</i> <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/blogs/~masher">http://www.dailytech.com/blogs/~masher</a></li><li><b>ICECAP</b> <a href="http://icecap.us/">http://icecap.us/</a><br /></li><li><b><em>JunkScience.com</em></b> <a href="http://www.junkscience.com/">http://www.junkscience.com/</a></li><li><i><b>Global Warming Hysteria</b></i> <a href="http://www.globalwarminghysteria.com/">http://www.globalwarminghysteria.com/</a> </li><li><i><b>Global Warming Skeptics</b></i> <a href="http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/</a> </li><li><i><b>Global Warming and Other Myths</b></i> <a href="http://www.geocities.com/jbraun1984/">http://www.geocities.com/jbraun1984/</a> </li><p><i>Articles</i></p><table style="FONT-SIZE: 100%" width="40%" align="right"><caption><b>Lawrence Solomon: The Deniers I-XLII &amp; more</b><br />Lawrence Solomon's list at his Website:<br /><a href="http://www.urban-renaissance.org/urbanren/index.cfm?DSP=larry&amp;SubID=163">http://www.urban-renaissance.org/urbanren/index.cfm?DSP=larry&amp;SubID=163</a><br />He has now published a book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Deniers-Renowned-Scientists-Political-Persecution/dp/0980076315/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201750303&sr=8-1"><i>The Deniers</i></a>.<br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Note on asterisked dates: the <i>National Post</i> online articles I through X say that Fri, Feb 2, 2007 is the publication date, but many of those articles include earlier datelines which correspond to the dates provided at L. Solomon's own list.</span><br /></caption><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#ffffff"><li><b>The Maligners - The Deniers, Part XLII</b> <br />Lawrence Solomon, Thu, Jan 31, 2008, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/01/31/the-maligners-solomon.aspx">http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/01/31/the-maligners-solomon.aspx</a></li><li><b>Geo-pipe dreams - The Deniers, Part XLI</b> <br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Jan 26, 2008, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada) <br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=264981">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=264981</a></li><li><b>Carbon as currency - The Deniers, Part XL</b> <br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Jan 12, 2008, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada) <br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=232092">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=232092</a></li><li><b>Coal enters rehab: Moralizing utopians aim to ban a limitless supply of energy</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Dec 7, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=150830">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=150830</a></li><li><b>Green hero slammed as climate heretic - The Deniers, Part XXXIX</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Tue, Nov 20, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=103128">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=103128</a></li><li><b>Climate change by Jupiter - The Deniers, Part XXXVIII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Nov 10, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=bfeddc8e-90d7-4f54-9ca7-1f56fadc7c2b">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=bfeddc8e-90d7-4f54-9ca7-1f56fadc7c2b</a><br />and <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=88247">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=88247</a></li><li><b>Why melting of ice sheets 'is impossible' - The Deniers, Part XXXVII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Nov 2, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=73f39d90-644f-4117-880c-204c3a4fe4a3">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=73f39d90-644f-4117-880c-204c3a4fe4a3</a><br />and <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=71093">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=71093</a></li><li><b>IPCC too blinkered and corrupt to save - The Deniers, Part XXXVI</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Oct 26, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=55387187-4d06-446f-9f4f-c2397d155a32">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=55387187-4d06-446f-9f4f-c2397d155a32</a><br />and <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=57252">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=57252</a></li><li><b>You still need your parka in Antarctica - The Deniers, Part XXXV</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Sep 15, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1edd8fbd-7084-4eb1-9f39-ecdee5378809">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1edd8fbd-7084-4eb1-9f39-ecdee5378809</a></li><li><b>The hot trend is cool yachts - The Deniers, Part XXXIV</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Sep 8, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=c365f546-f6f4-4a34-abec-125e53e8263e">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=c365f546-f6f4-4a34-abec-125e53e8263e</a></li><li><b>The aerosol man - The Deniers, Part XXXIII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Sep 1, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=340a4cc3-b513-4e32-aaff-dbeb39267a79">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=340a4cc3-b513-4e32-aaff-dbeb39267a79</a></li><li><b>From chaos, coherence - The Deniers, Part XXXII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Wed, Aug 15, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=288ba340-98f9-4fbe-8412-acf920b32604">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=288ba340-98f9-4fbe-8412-acf920b32604</a></li><li><b>In the eye of the storm over global warming - The Deniers Part XXXI</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Mon, Jul 30, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=7b343fd7-d786-45e7-83a1-12eb4ea49e56">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=7b343fd7-d786-45e7-83a1-12eb4ea49e56</a> </li><li><b>Vertical farming</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Jul 21, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=8d7dc5fa-292c-4231-bc37-91bb81a8d69b">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=8d7dc5fa-292c-4231-bc37-91bb81a8d69b</a> </li><li><b>What global warming, Australian skeptic asks - The Deniers Part XXX</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Tue, Jul 17, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=d71dfa89-384c-4ede-a759-55fb7ffdcfc2">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=d71dfa89-384c-4ede-a759-55fb7ffdcfc2</a></li><li><b>Models trump measurements - The Deniers Part XXIX</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Jul 7, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=433b593b-6637-4a42-970b-bdef8947fa4e">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=433b593b-6637-4a42-970b-bdef8947fa4e</a> </li><li><b>Open mind sees climate clearly - The Deniers Part XXVIII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Jun 29, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=7c2c1cf2-643e-4fdb-8952-cc648332278d">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=7c2c1cf2-643e-4fdb-8952-cc648332278d</a> </li><li><b>How many planets?: 'Ecological footprint' theory has nothing to do with ecology and everything to do with a slavish worship of primitivism</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Tue, Jun 19, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=a63f46ee-13ba-429c-bd50-7f1ee92af02e">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=a63f46ee-13ba-429c-bd50-7f1ee92af02e</a></li><li><b>Forget warming - beware the new ice age - The Deniers Part XXVII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Jun 15, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=bdc24964-7f82-4f7a-863c-f0ff43010278">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=bdc24964-7f82-4f7a-863c-f0ff43010278</a></li><li><b>NASA chief Michael Griffin silenced - The Deniers Part XXVI</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Jun 8, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=2271ac23-6895-4789-9da0-6b28968b8d15">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=2271ac23-6895-4789-9da0-6b28968b8d15</a></li><li><b>They call this a consensus? - The Deniers Part XXV</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Jun 2, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=c47c1209-233b-412c-b6d1-5c755457a8af">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=c47c1209-233b-412c-b6d1-5c755457a8af</a></li><li><b>Dire forecasts aren't new - The Deniers Part XXIV</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, May 25, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=c8019202-b14c-4cd8-9192-782d5b5d8b3d">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=c8019202-b14c-4cd8-9192-782d5b5d8b3d</a></li><li><b>Discounting logic - The Deniers Part XXIII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, May 18, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=7bd269b6-b2e7-44d2-85e0-e7749714ba34">http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=7bd269b6-b2e7-44d2-85e0-e7749714ba34</a> </li><li><b>Some restraint in Rome - The Deniers Part XXII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, May 11, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=121163d6-d6b9-45bb-830c-5d27f88f899a">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=121163d6-d6b9-45bb-830c-5d27f88f899a</a></li><li><b>The ice-core man - The Deniers Part XXI</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, May 4, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=25526754-e53a-4899-84af-5d9089a5dcb6">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=25526754-e53a-4899-84af-5d9089a5dcb6</a></li><li><b>Gore's guru disagreed - The Deniers Part XX</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Sat, Apr 28, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=58e0c50c-1631-46ca-8719-778c0973526e">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=58e0c50c-1631-46ca-8719-778c0973526e</a></li><li><b>Science, not politics - The Deniers Part XIX</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Apr 13, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=5b824408-9df0-4189-86fc-cf6465bf0aa8">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=5b824408-9df0-4189-86fc-cf6465bf0aa8</a></li><li><b>Fighting climate 'fluff' - The Deniers Part XVIII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Thu, Apr 5, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=985641c9-8594-43c2-802d-947d65555e8e">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=985641c9-8594-43c2-802d-947d65555e8e</a></li><li><b>Little ice age is still within us - The Deniers Part XVII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Mar 30, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=94b7d021-c5da-4e82-b37f-53d338709fb1">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=94b7d021-c5da-4e82-b37f-53d338709fb1</a></li><li><b>Bitten by the IPCC - The Deniers Part XVI</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Mar 23, 2007, The <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=0ea8dc23-ad1a-440f-a8dd-1e3ff42df34f">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=0ea8dc23-ad1a-440f-a8dd-1e3ff42df34f</a></li><li><b>Unsettled Science - The Deniers Part XV</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Wed, Mar 14, 2007, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=7e23a550-9cc4-4697-b730-b2d094f1628a">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=7e23a550-9cc4-4697-b730-b2d094f1628a</a></li><li><b>The heat's in the sun - The Deniers Part XIV</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Mar 9, 2007, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada) <a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=67ac2d90-ec56-4460-a831-75aacc20670d">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=67ac2d90-ec56-4460-a831-75aacc20670d</a> </li><li><b>Allegre's second thoughts - The Deniers Part XIII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Mar 2, 2007, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=2f4cc62e-5b0d-4b59-8705-fc28f14da388">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=2f4cc62e-5b0d-4b59-8705-fc28f14da388</a> </li><li><b>Clouded research - The Deniers Part Part XII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Feb 23, 2007, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=975f250d-ca5d-4f40-b687-a1672ed1f684">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=975f250d-ca5d-4f40-b687-a1672ed1f684</a> </li><li><b>End the chill - The Deniers Part XI</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Feb 9, 2007, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=216ca730-10f0-4614-9692-fc37d99cbac3">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=216ca730-10f0-4614-9692-fc37d99cbac3</a> </li><li><b>Limited role for C02 - the Deniers Part X</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Feb 2, 2007, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=069cb5b2-7d81-4a8e-825d-56e0f112aeb5">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=069cb5b2-7d81-4a8e-825d-56e0f112aeb5</a><br />(also titled: <b>The real deal?: Against the grain: Some scientists deny global warming exists</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Fri, Feb 2, 2007, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=156df7e6-d490-41c9-8b1f-106fef8763c6">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=156df7e6-d490-41c9-8b1f-106fef8763c6</a> </li><li><b>Look to Mars for the truth on global warming - The Deniers Part IX</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Jan 26, 2007*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=edae9952-3c3e-47ba-913f-7359a5c7f723">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=edae9952-3c3e-47ba-913f-7359a5c7f723</a> </li><li><b>The limits of predictability - The Deniers Part VIII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Jan 19, 2007*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=9bc9a7c6-2729-4d07-9629-807f1dee479f">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=9bc9a7c6-2729-4d07-9629-807f1dee479f</a> </li><li><b>Will the sun cool us? - The Deniers Part VII</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Jan 12, 2007*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=17fad0e2-6f6b-41f3-bdd8-8e9eeb015777">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=17fad0e2-6f6b-41f3-bdd8-8e9eeb015777</a> </li><li><b>The sun moves climate change -- The Deniers Part VI</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Jan 5, 2007*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=fee9a01f-3627-4b01-9222-bf60aa332f1f">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=fee9a01f-3627-4b01-9222-bf60aa332f1f</a> </li><li><b>The original denier: into the cold - The Deniers Part V</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Dec 22, 2006*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=63ab844f-8c55-4059-9ad8-89de085af353">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=63ab844f-8c55-4059-9ad8-89de085af353</a> </li><li><b>Polar scientists on thin ice - The Deniers Part IV</b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Dec 15, 2006*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=b228f4b0-a869-4f85-ba08-902b95c45dcf">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=b228f4b0-a869-4f85-ba08-902b95c45dcf</a> </li><li><b>The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science - The Deniers Part III </b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Dec 8, 2006*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=ae9b984d-4a1c-45c0-af24-031a1380121a">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=ae9b984d-4a1c-45c0-af24-031a1380121a</a> </li><li><b>Warming is real -- and has benefits - The Deniers Part II </b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Dec 1, 2006*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=1d78fc67-3784-4542-a07c-e7eeec46d1fc">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=1d78fc67-3784-4542-a07c-e7eeec46d1fc</a> </li><li><b>Statistics needed - The Deniers Part I </b><br />Lawrence Solomon, Nov 28, 2006*, the <i>National Post</i> (Canada)<br /><a href="http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=22003a0d-37cc-4399-8bcc-39cd20bed2f6">http://www.nationalpost/story.html?id=22003a0d-37cc-4399-8bcc-39cd20bed2f6</a> </li></td></tr></tbody></table><li><b>Global warming impact may be overstated</b> <br />The <i>Telegraph</i> (UK), January 10, 2008<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/10/sciglacier110.xml">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/10/sciglacier110.xml</a></li><li><b>A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model predictions</b> <br />David H. Douglass, John R. Christy, Benjamin D. Pearson, and S. Fred Singer, <i>International Journal of Climatology</i>, received May 31, 2007; accepted Oct 11, 2007; published Dec 12, 2007 <br /><a href="http://www.uah.edu/News/pdf/climatemodel.pdf">http://www.uah.edu/News/pdf/climatemodel.pdf</a> </li><li><b>Survey: Less Than Half of all Published Scientists Endorse Global Warming Theory</b><br />Michael Asher, science blog at the <i>Daily Tech</i>, Aug 29, 2007 <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=8641">http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=8641</a><br />Note: the survey in question went unpublished and some pretty significant criticisms have been made against it or related work by the survey's author (not Michael Asher). I (who likewise am not Michael Asher!) got a little confused about which work by the survey's author was in question but I dug far enough to run into the significant questions). Anyway, part of the problem was that Benny Peiser had already done the work. SO, <a href="#peiser"><b>click here to skip down to Peiser's piece</b></a>. </li><li><b>Argument of global warming questioned: Study says reports of change in ocean may be premature</b><br />Alan Zarembo, <i>Los Angeles Times</i> <span style="font-size:85%;">via <i>JournalNow.com</i> (<i>Winston-Salem Journal</i>)</span>, Aug 17, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1173352416458"><small>http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1173352416458</small></a> </li><li><b>Capturing the Atlantic's Capricious Currents: A belt of monitors girdling the Atlantic reveal that its currents are fickle</b><br />David Biello, <i>ScientificAmerican.com</i>, Aug 16, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=708A8967-E7F2-99DF-3368594A3B3EFA47">http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=708A8967-E7F2-99DF-3368594A3B3EFA47</a> </li><li><b>Overturning the "Consensus" in One Fell Swoop</b><br />Joel Schwartz, <i>Planet Gore, National Review Online</i>, Aug 16, 2007, 3:34 pm<br /><a href="http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDc0MTY2NmVlOWNiNjc4ODk0NGUzMDE2YTRlMjMxNzc=">http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDc0MTY2NmVlOWNiNjc4ODk0NGUzMDE2YTRlMjMxNzc=</a> </li><li><b>Heat Capacity, Time Constant, and Sensitivity of Earth's Climate System</b><br />Preprint, Stephen E. Schwartz, Brookhaven National Laboratory, June 2007<br /><a href="http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/pubs/HeatCapacity.pdf">http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/pubs/HeatCapacity.pdf</a> </li><li><b style="BACKGROUND: yellow 0% 50%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial">Does Hansen's Error "Matter"?</b><br />Steve McIntyre, <i>Climate Audit</i>, Aug 11, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1885">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1885</a></li><li><b>Blogger Finds Y2K Bug in NASA Climate Data</b><br />Michael Asher, science blog in <i>Daily Tech</i>, Aug 9, 2007 11:49 AM<br />Quick summary under memorable title. Quote: <span style="font-family:'times new roman',times,georgia,serif;">"The effect of the correction on global temperatures is minor (some 1-2% less warming than originally thought), but the effect on the U.S. global warming propaganda machine could be huge."</span><br /><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+Y2K+bug+in+NASA+Climate+Data/article8383.htm">http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+Y2K+bug+in+NASA+Climate+Data/article8383.htm</a> </li><li><b>Breaking News: Recent US Temperature Numbers Revised Downwards Today </b><br />Warren Meyer, <i>Coyote Blog</i>, Aug 8, 2007, 11:58 pm<br />Yes, another blog, but where's the regular press?<br /><a href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/official-us-cli.html">http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/official-us-cli.html</a> </li><li><b>1998 no longer the hottest year on record in USA</b><br />Anthony Watts, <i>Watts Up With That?</i>, Aug 8, 2007, 04:08 PM<br />Not a regular news source, but (<i>shrugs</i>) dude helped break the news. Anthony Watts of surfacestations.org.<br /><a href="http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/2007/08/1998_no_longer_the_hottest_yea.html">http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/2007/08/1998_no_longer_the_hottest_yea.html</a></li><li><b>Heretical Thoughts About Science and Society</b><br />Freeman Dyson, <u>Edge</u> #219, Aug 9, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge219.html#dysonf">http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge219.html#dysonf</a><br /></li><li><b style="BACKGROUND: rgb(255,255,0) 0% 50%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial">Will the Real USHCN Data Set Please Stand Up?</b><br />Steve McIntyre, <i>Climate Audit</i>, Aug 7, 2007, 6:42 pm<br />Steve McIntyre finds Y2K bug in NASA climate data. NASA responds and revises US temperatures downward.<br /><a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1878">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1878</a> </li><li><b>The truth is, we can't ignore the sun</b><br />David Whitehouse (astronomer), The <i>Telegraph</i> (UK), Jul 15, 2007 <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/07/15/do1508.xml">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/07/15/do1508.xml</a></li><li><b>Forecasts all up in the air</b><br />Bob Carter (paleontologist, stratigrapher, marine geologist), <i>Courier-Mail</i> (Australia), Jun 30, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21977114-27197,00.html">http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,21977114-27197,00.html</a></li><li><b>Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny</b><br />James M. Taylor, The <i>Chicago Sun-Times</i>, Jun 30, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT-REF30b.article">http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT-REF30b.article</a></li><li><b>Local scientist calls global warming theory hooey</b><br />[about Reid Bryson, regarded as "father of scientific climatology"]<br />Samara Kalk Derby, The <i>Capital Times</i> (Madison, Wisc.), Jun 18, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.madison.com/tct/mad/topstories/index.php?ntid=197613">http://www.madison.com/tct/mad/topstories/index.php?ntid=197613</a></li><li><b>Coal Man: There's at least one CEO left who is not buying global warming hysteria.</b> [Interview of Robert E. Murray]<br />Kimberley A. Strassel, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 19, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010098">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010098</a></li><li><b>Carbon dioxide, storm strength not linked, Gray says</b><br />Jim Wayne, <i>Florida Today</i> (Gannett), May 19, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070519/NEWS04/705190328/1006/NEWS01">http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070519/NEWS04/705190328/1006/NEWS01</a> </li><li><b>Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics</b> [with over a dozen names, plus discussions and links]<br />Marc Morano, The <i>Inhofe EPW Press Blog</i> (Senator Inhofe, R-OK), May 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&amp;ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12">http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&amp;ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12</a> </li><li><b>Global Warming: Not the End of the World as We Know It</b><br />Von Olaf Stampf, <i>Spiegel Online</i>, May 9, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Or-will-Arrhenius-end">http://www.google.com/search?q=Or-will-Arrhenius-end</a> </li><li><b>The Faithful Heretic: A Wisconsin Icon Pursues Tough Questions </b><br />Dave Hoopman, May 2007, <em>Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News<br /></em>(about leading climatologist Reid Bryson)<br /><a href="http://www.wecnmagazine.com/2007issues/may/may07.html">http://www.wecnmagazine.com/2007issues/may/may07.html</a></li><li><b>Global warming debate 'irrational': scientists</b><br />Stephanie Stein, <i>Cornwall Standard-Freeholder</i> (Canada), Apr 26, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Global+warming+debate+%27irrational%27%22">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Global+warming+debate+%27irrational%27%22</a> </li><li><b>Inconvenient Truths: Novel science fiction on global warming.</b><br />Patrick J. Michaels, <em>National Review Online</em>, Apr 23, 2007<br /><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjI4NTc0YWMzNTA3ZjRmYmJiMDRjNmI5MGEwZTFhM2E">http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjI4NTc0YWMzNTA3ZjRmYmJiMDRjNmI5MGEwZTFhM2E</a> </li><li><b>Climate change skeptics say it's hard to get heard</b><br />Jeff Mason, <i>Reuters</i>, Apr 18, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USL1829984220070418">http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USL1829984220070418</a> </li><li><b>A dangerous climate </b><br />Bob Carter (geologist &amp; marine geologist), Apr 11, 2007, <i>Sunday Telegraph</i><br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/08/nrclimate08.xml">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/08/nrclimate08.xml</a> </li><li><b>The Great Global Warming Swindle</b> (video documentary)<br />Channel 4 (U.K.), (broadcast on) Thursday, Mar 8, 2007, at 9pm (UK time)<br /><a href="http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=great+global+warming+swindle&amp;hl=en">http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=great+global+warming+swindle&amp;hl=en</a> </li><li><b>The Great Global Warming Swindle</b> (article, not the video documentary)<br />Channel 4 (U.K.), from before Mar 8, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html">http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html</a></li><li><b>Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says</b><br /><i>National Geographic</i>, Mar 8, 2007<br /><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html</a> <b></b></li><li><b>'Blame cosmic rays not CO2 for warming up the planet'</b><br />Lewis Smith, <em>Times</em> (UK), Feb 12, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article1368920.ece">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article1368920.ece</a> </li><li><b>An experiment that hints we are wrong on climate change</b><br />Nigel Calder (former editor of New Scientist), <em>Sunday Times</em> (UK), Feb 11, 2007 <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece</a> </li><li><b>NO: It's a fact that their numbers are up fivefold since the 1970s</b> [also published as "<b>Polar bears on thin ice, not really!</b>"]<br />H. Sterling Burnett, <em>McClatchy-Tribune News Service</em> via the<em> Charlotte Observer</em>, Jan 2, 2007, also via the <em>Pittsburg Tribune-Review</em><br /><a href="http://eteam.ncpa.org/commentaries/polar-bears-on-thin-ice-not-really">http://eteam.ncpa.org/commentaries/polar-bears-on-thin-ice-not-really</a> </li><li><b>Al Gore Is a Greenhouse Gasbag: Penn professor Bob Giegengack has a few quibbles with the former VP on this whole global warming thing</b><br />John Marchese, <em>Philadelphia Magazine</em>, Jan 2007<br /><a href="http://www.phillymag.com/articles/science_al_gore_is_a_greenhouse_gasbag">http://www.phillymag.com/articles/science_al_gore_is_a_greenhouse_gasbag</a> </li><li><b>A sample of experts' comments about the science of "An Inconvenient Truth"</b><br />Tom Harris, Natural Resources Stewardship Project, <i>Canada Free Press</i>, Nov 7, 2006<br /><a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris110706a.htm">http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris110706a.htm</a> </li><li><b>Public Disservice: Melting myths.</b><br />Patrick J. Michaels, <em>National Review Online</em>, Jul 26, 2006<br /><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OWZkMDU5NmM4MzVmNDQ2NGNhYjcxNjY3NGJiZWU2Njc">http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OWZkMDU5NmM4MzVmNDQ2NGNhYjcxNjY3NGJiZWU2Njc</a>= </li><li><b>Climate of Fear: Global-warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.</b><br />Richard Lindzen (Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT), <em>Opinion Journal</em>, Apr 12, 2006<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220">http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220</a> </li><li><b>There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998</b><br />Bob Carter (geologist in paleoclimate research), <em>Opinion.Telegraph</em> (UK), Apr 9, 2006<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/09/do0907.xml&amp;sSheet=/news/2006/04/09/ixworld.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/09/do0907.xml&amp;sSheet=/news/2006/04/09/ixworld.html</a> <b></b></li><li><b>Open Kyoto to debate: Sixty scientists call on Harper to revisit the science of global warming</b><br /><em>National Post</em> [Canada], Apr 6, 2006<br /><a href="http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=3711460e-bd5a-475d-a6be-4db87559d605">http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=3711460e-bd5a-475d-a6be-4db87559d605</a> </li><li><b>Complexity Theory and Environmental Management</b><br />Michael Crichton, Speech at the Washington Center for Complexity and Public Policy, Washington, DC, Nov 6, 2005<br /><a href="http://www.crichton-official.com/speech-complexity.html">http://www.crichton-official.com/speech-complexity.html</a></li><li><b>[Beginning of] The Global-Warming God: Must it now be appeased?</b><br />Patrick J. Michaels, <em>National Review Online</em>, Oct 5, 2005<br /><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjIzZWM3Y2M5ZmM3MjdkM2NiMDY1NTgzOWU5NzRmYTg">http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjIzZWM3Y2M5ZmM3MjdkM2NiMDY1NTgzOWU5NzRmYTg</a>= </li><li><b>Testimony Before the United States Senate</b><br />Michael Crichton at the Committee on Environment and Public Works, Washington, DC, Sep 28, 2005<br /><a href="http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-senatetestimony.html">http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-senatetestimony.html</a></li><li><b>Interview with Dr. William Gray</b><br />James K. Glassman, <em>TCSDaily</em>, Sep 9, 2005<br /><a href="http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=041106H">http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=041106H</a> </li><li><b>Discover Dialogue: Meteorologist William Gray</b><br />Kathy A. Svitil, <em>Discover</em> Vol. 26 No. 09, Sep 2005<br /><a href="http://www.discover.com/issues/sep-05/departments/discover-dialogue/">http://www.discover.com/issues/sep-05/departments/discover-dialogue/</a> </li><li><b>Interview with Dr. S. Fred Singer</b><br /><i>Frontline</i>, PBS, undated<br /><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/warming/debate/singer.html">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/warming/debate/singer.html</a> </li><li><b>Wildlife groups axe Bellamy as global warming ‘heretic’</b> [about Dr. David Bellamy, botanist &amp; environmental campaigner]<br />Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor, <i>The Sunday Times</i> (UK), May 15, 2005<br /><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article522744.ece">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article522744.ece</a> </li><li><b>Leading scientific journals 'are censoring debate on global warming'</b> <br />Robert Matthews, the <i>Telegraph</i> (UK), May 1, 2005 <br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/05/01/wglob01.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/05/01/ixworld.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/05/01/wglob01.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/05/01/ixworld.html</a><br /><a href="http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:fZyWYzorRJ8J:www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml%3Fxml%3D/news/2005/05/01/wglob01.xml%26sSheet%3D/news/2005/05/01/ixworld.htm">Google cache</a> </li><a name=peiser></a><li><b>The Dangers of Consensus Science</b><br />Benny Peiser, originally in the <i>National Post</i> (Canada), May 17, 2005<br />Peiser (homepage <a href="http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/">http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/</a>) is a social anthropologist at John Moores University in Liverpool, UK. Counters claim by Naomi Oreskes in <i>Science</i> 2004 that there is unanimous "scientific consensus" on anthropogenic causes of recent global warming. <i>Science</i> refused to publish Peiser's response on grounds that his points had been "widely dispersed on the internet." <i>Nature</i> also refused to publish.<br /><a href="http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/NationalPost.htm">http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/NationalPost.htm</a> <br />See also his "<b>Update: The Oreskes abstracts</b>" at <a href="http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/Oreskes-abstracts.htm">http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/Oreskes-abstracts.htm</a> Peiser has posted all documents and abstracts listed in the ISI database under the key words “global climate change” (for the period 1993 – 2003) so that you can check for yourself. </li><li><b>The Case For Skepticism On Global Warming</b><br />Michael Crichton, speech at the National Press Club, Washington DC, Jan 25, 2005<br /><a href="http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-ourenvironmentalfuture.html">http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-ourenvironmentalfuture.html</a> </li><li><b>Why Politicized Science is Dangerous</b><br />(Excerpted from <i>State of Fear</i>) by Michael Crichton<br /><a href="http://www.crichton-official.com/essay-stateoffear-whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html">http://www.crichton-official.com/essay-stateoffear-whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html</a> </li><li><b>Environmentalism as Religion</b><br />Michael Crichton, speech at the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, CA, Sep 15, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-environmentalismaseligion.html">http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-environmentalismaseligion.html</a></li><li><b>Aliens Cause Global Warming</b><br />Michael Crichton, lecture at the California Institute of Technology, Jan 17, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-alienscauseglobalwarming.html">http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-alienscauseglobalwarming.html</a></li><li><b>Clip from Penn &amp; Teller’s “Environmental Hysteria” episode</b> (2003) of their cable TV series<br /><a href="http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/prevepisodes.do?episodeid=s1/eh">http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/prevepisodes.do?episodeid=s1/eh</a> <br /><b>The whole episode:</b> <br /><a href="http://z4.invisionfree.com/Popular_Technology/index.php?showtopic=2544">http://z4.invisionfree.com/Popular_Technology/index.php?showtopic=2544</a></li>ForNownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-53484849581817263932007-05-12T09:24:00.000-04:002007-06-28T21:24:50.571-04:00Defending Wolfowitz & Riza<li><b>Crying Wolfowitz: . . . while the United Nations bankrolls dictators.</b><br />Claudia Rosett, <i>The Weekly Standard</i>, Posted May 19, 2007, Volume 012, Issue 35, May 28, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/675mviot.asp">http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/675mviot.asp</a> <b></b></li><li><b>World Bank Justice: Wolfowitz's resignation offers a window into a corrupt institution.</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 18, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010095">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010095</a> </li><li><b>World Bank and Wolfowitz official statements</b><br /><i>The American Thinker</i>, May 17, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/05/world_bank_and_wolfowitz_offic.html">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/05/world_bank_and_wolfowitz_offic.html</a> <b></b></li><li><b>World Bank Scholar: Paul Wolfowitz's judges may have ethical issues of their own.</b><br />Bret Stephens, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 17, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/bstephens/?id=110010086">http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/bstephens/?id=110010086</a> </li><li><b>The Attempted Putsch at the World Bank</b><br />Clarice Feldman, <i>The American Thinker</i>, May 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/05/the_attempted_putsch_at_the_wo.html">http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/05/the_attempted_putsch_at_the_wo.html</a> <b></b></li><li><b>World Bank Jobbery: More evidence the Wolfowitz accusers chose to ignore.</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010075">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010075</a> </li><li><b>[LEAKED] Statement of Paul Wolfowitz to the World Bank Group Executive Directors</b><br /><i>WorldBankPresident.org</i> (anti-Wolfowitz), May 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.worldbankpresident.org/archives/PWStatementMay15.pdf">http://www.worldbankpresident.org/archives/PWStatementMay15.pdf</a> </li><li><b>Wolfowitz Lifeline Shortens and John Briscoe Speaks.</b><br />Deep Insider, <i>WorldBankPresident.org</i> (anti-Wolfowitz), May 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.worldbankpresident.org/archives/000716.php">http://www.worldbankpresident.org/archives/000716.php</a> </li><li><b>World Bank Wolfowitz Report with Wolfowitz's Response</b><br /><em>The American Thinker</em>, May 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/05/world_bank_wolfowitz_report_wi.html">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/05/world_bank_wolfowitz_report_wi.html</a><b></b></li><li><b>George Soros and the Future of the World Bank</b><br />Ed Lasky, <em>The American Thinker</em>, May 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/05/george_soros_and_the_future_of.html">http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/05/george_soros_and_the_future_of.html</a> </li><li><b>A Brave Woman Scorned: The campaign against Shaha Riza is the nastiest character assassination I have ever seen.</b><br />Christopher Hitchens, <i>Slate</i>, May 14, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2166136/">http://www.slate.com/id/2166136/</a> </li><li><b>Axis of Soros: The men and motives behind the World Bank coup attempt.</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 9, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010050">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010050</a> </li><li><b>Gagging Shaha Riza: Why won't the World Bank let her have her say?</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 4, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010024">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010024</a> </li><li><b>World Bank Rolls: Nearly 1,400 employees make more than Condi Rice.</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 3, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010018">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010018</a> </li><li><b>[LEAKED] Official statements of Shaha Riza and Paul Wolfowitz</b><br />Clarice Feldman, <i>The American Thinker</i>, May 1, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/05/official_statements_of_shaha_r.html">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/05/official_statements_of_shaha_r.html</a> <b></b></li><li><b>Notes on a Scandal: How ethical are Paul Wolfowitz's detractors?</b><br />Bret Stephens, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), May 1, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/bstephens/?id=110010012">http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/bstephens/?id=110010012</a> </li><li><b>Africans for Wolfowitz: Third World reformers resist a coup by rich Europeans.</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), Apr 27, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009995">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009995</a> </li><li><b>The Real World Bank Scandal: Why the bureaucracy wants to oust Paul Wolfowitz.</b><br />Robert B. Holland III, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), Apr 20, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009965">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009965</a> </li><li><b>Sliming Wolfowitz: The World Bank president did nothing wrong.</b><br />Christopher Hitchens, <i>Slate</i>, Apr 17, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2164368/">http://www.slate.com/id/2164368/</a> </li><li><b>The Wolfowitz Set-up: Just Say "No"</b><br />Clarice Feldman, <i>The American Thinker</i>, Apr 17, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/the_wolfowitz_setup_just_say_n.html">http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/the_wolfowitz_setup_just_say_n.html</a> </li><li><b>The Wolfowitz Files: The anatomy of a World Bank smear.</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), Apr 16, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/?id=110009948">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/?id=110009948</a> </li><li><b>World Bank Power Play: The bureaucracy bites back at Paul Wolfowitz.</b><br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), Apr 15, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009943">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009943</a></li><li><b>Cleaning Up The World Bank: Its mission: to end global poverty. But corruption has cost it billions. How to weed out the crooks and grifters</b><br />Danielle Knight & Edward T. Pound, <i>U.S. News &amp; World Report</i>, Posted March 26, 2006<br /><a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/060403/3worldbank.htm">http://www.usnews.com/usnews/biztech/articles/060403/3worldbank.htm</a> </li>ForNownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-19378942533999313452007-05-10T20:53:00.000-04:002008-01-12T22:07:41.054-05:00Deaths of Iraqis since the invasion<li><b>Anti-war Soros funded Iraq study</b> <br />Brendan Montague, the <i>Times</i> (UK), Sunday, Jan 13, 2008<br /><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3177653.ece">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3177653.ece</a><li><b>Violence-Related Mortality in Iraq from 2002 to 2006</b><br />Iraq Family Health Survey Study Group, <i>New England Journal of Medicine</i>, Jan 9, 2008 <br /><a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMsa0707782">http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMsa0707782</a></li><li><b>The Lancet's Political Hit</b><br />Review & Outlook [Editorial], <i>Wall Street Journal</i>, Jan 9, 2008; Page A14<br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119984087808076475.html">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119984087808076475.html</a></li><li><b>Data Bomb</b> <br />Neil Munro and Carl M. Cannon, <i>National Journal</i>, Friday, Jan 4, 2008<br /><a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/databomb/index.htm">http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/databomb/index.htm</a></li><li><b>Document drop: A new critique of the 2004 Lancet Iraq death toll study</b><br />Includes entire 2007 article "<span style="background-color:#ffff66">Comments on the Confidence Intervals of Roberts et al. (2004)</span>" by David Kane, Institute Fellow at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science at Harvard University. Kane says that Les Roberts et al. got it wrong, very wrong.<br />Michelle Malkin, <i>MichelleMalkin.com</i>, Jul 25, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2007</span> 11:01 AM<br /><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/25/document-drop-a-new-critique-of-the-2004-lancet-iraq-death-toll-study/">http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/25/document-drop-a-new-critique-of-the-2004-lancet-iraq-death-toll-study/</a> </li><li><b>Democrat Trashes Republicans</b><br />Tim Blair, Oct 20, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2006</span>. Johns Hopkins study leader Les Roberts ran in a Democrat primary for Congress in 2006. I googled around and it's the same Les Roberts indeed.<br /><a href="http://timblair.net/ee/index.php/weblog/democrat_trashes_republicans/">http://timblair.net/ee/index.php/weblog/democrat_trashes_republicans/</a> </li><li><b>The Lancet: Medical Journal Or Activist Rag?</b><br />J.F. Beck, <i>RWDB</i>, Oct 13, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2006</span>. Provides info and many links about the <em>Lancet</em> and its sorry history since Richard Horton became its editor.<br /><a href="http://rwdb.blogspot.com/2006_10_08_rwdb_archive.html">http://rwdb.blogspot.com/2006_10_08_rwdb_archive.html</a> </li><li><b>655,000 War Dead?: A bogus study on Iraq casualties.</b><br />Steven E. Moore, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), Oct 18, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2006</span><br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009108">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009108</a> </li><li><b>Exaggeration won't save Iraqis: The new claims about the civilian death toll in Iraq are vastly overstated</b><br />David Burchell, The <i>Australian</i>, Oct 19, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2006</span><br /><a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20604818-7583,00.html">http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20604818-7583,00.html</a> </li><br />The same Johns Hopkins team under the same Les Roberts had submitted another bogus report to the same Brit medical journal (the Lancet) just before the <span style="color:#ff0000;">2004</span> US election.<br /><br /><li><b>100,000 Civilian Deaths Estimated in Iraq</b><br />Rob Stein, <i>Washington Post</i> Staff Writer, Oct 29, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2004</span>; Page A16. Even the WaPo casts doubt on the study and quotes Human Rights Watch senior military analyst Marc E. Garlasco saying "The methods that they used are certainly prone to inflation due to overcounting" & "These numbers seem to be inflated." (But look at article's title! An old journalistic trick -- the reader who only glances takes only the propaganda in.)<br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7967-2004Oct28.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7967-2004Oct28.html</a> </li><li><b>100,000 Dead -- or 8,000: How many Iraqi civilians <i>have</i> died as a result of the war?</b><br />Fred Kaplan, <i>Slate</i>, Oct 29, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2004</span><br /><a href="http://www.slate.com/Default.aspx?id=2108887">http://www.slate.com/Default.aspx?id=2108887</a>&amp; </li><li><b>Bogus Lancet Study</b><br />Shannon Love, <i>Chicago Boyz</i>, Oct 29, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2004</span><br /><a href="http://www.chicagoboyz.net/archives/002543.html">http://www.chicagoboyz.net/archives/002543.html</a> </li><li><b>Comment on "Bogus Lancet Study"</b><br />AMMackay, <em>Chicago Boyz</em>, Oct 29, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2004</span>. Not only did the study's lead author Les Roberts submit it to the <i>Lancet</i> on condition that it be published before the 2004 US election, but also, as MacKay points out, the peer review process was extraordinarily compressed.<br /><a href="http://www.chicagoboyz.net/archives/002543.html#009323">http://www.chicagoboyz.net/archives/002543.html#009323</a> </li><li><b>Lancet Civilian Death Report Kills the Truth</b><br />Michael Fumento, <i>Tech Central Station</i>, Nov 1, <span style="color:#ff0000;">2004</span><br /><a href="http://www.techcentralstation.com/110104H.html">http://www.techcentralstation.com/110104H.html</a> </li>ForNownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-57068454380747287222007-05-09T18:33:00.001-04:002008-03-28T02:42:10.446-04:00Iraq sanctions<li><b>Confessions of an Anti-Sanctions Activist</b><br />Charles M. Brown, <i>Middle East Forum</i>, Summer 2003<br /><a href="http://www.meforum.org/article/548">http://www.meforum.org/article/548</a> </li><li><b>Propagandizing Sanctions</b> [a.k.a. "<b>Blood of Innocents</b>" a.k.a. "<b>MDs now blame Saddam, not sanctions, in babies' deaths</b>"]<br />Matthew McAllester (of <i>Newsday</i>), May 24, 2003, <i>Sun Journal</i> via <i>Newsday</i> and other newspapers<br /><a href="http://www.patriotfiles.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27665">http://www.patriotfiles.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27665</a></li><li><b>Saddam's parades of dead babies are exposed as a cynical charade</b><br />Charlotte Edwards, the <i>Telegraph</i> (UK), filed May 25, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/05/25/wirq25.xml">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/05/25/wirq25.xml</a> </li><li><b>Suffer The Children</b><br />Andrew Bolt, <i>Herald Sun</i> (Australia), June 16, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Pilger+was+far+from+the+only+journalist%22">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Pilger+was+far+from+the+only+journalist%22</a> </li>ForNownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-53251109172839051962007-05-09T07:01:00.002-04:002008-06-07T20:16:02.787-04:00Bad reporting of the Iraq invasion<li><b>Bizarro Broadcasting Company</b><br /><a href="http://author.nationalreview.com/?q=MjI2MQ==">Denis Boyles</a>, <i>Duck Season</i>, Apr 7, 2003<br />Now appearing as "<b>Notes from the Previous War: Bizarro Broadcasting Company</b>"<br />at <i>National Review Online</i>. This is a classic article, with good material on Andrew Gilligan foreshadowing Gilligan's later misreporting.<br /><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment072903.asp">http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment072903.asp</a> </li><li><b>Special Gloat and Quote Edition: Media's Erroneous Predictions</b><br /><i>CyberAlert Extra</i>, Media Research Center, Apr 9, 2003 (link repaired Jun 7, 2008)<br /><a href="http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030409_extra.asp">http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030409_extra.asp</a> </li><li><b>Who got it right and who got it wrong?</b> <br />The <i>Telegraph</i> (UK), filed Apr 10, 2003 (link repaired Jun 7, 2008)<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/1427173/Who-got-it-right-and-who-got-it-wrong.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/1427173/Who-got-it-right-and-who-got-it-wrong.html</a></li><li><b>[roundups of war misreporting, etc.]</b> <br />Andrew Sullivan, <i>The Daily Dish</i> Apr 6-11, 2003 (link repaired Jun 7, 2008)<br /><a href="http://time-blog.com/daily_dish/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2003_04_06_dish_archive.html">http://time-blog.com/daily_dish/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2003_04_06_dish_archive.html</a> </li><li><b>Bad Reporting in Baghdad</b><br />Jonathan Foreman, <i>The Weekly Standard</i>, May 12, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/629xnqei.asp">http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/629xnqei.asp</a> </li>ForNownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-59815733140547809022007-05-09T07:01:00.001-04:002007-07-27T14:38:37.143-04:00Eason Jordan & CNN misreporting on Iraq<li><b>John Burns: 'There Is Corruption in Our Business'</b><br />[Interview] <i>Editor & Publisher</i> with <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;lr=&ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&q=%22John+F.+Burns%22+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.iht.com">John F. Burns</a> Sep 15, 2003<br /><a href="http://groups.google.com/groups?q=corruption-in-our-business+John-Burns">http://groups.google.com/groups?q=corruption-in-our-business+John-Burns</a> </li><li><b>CNN's Access of Evil</b><br />Franklin Foer, <i>Opinion Journal</i>, Apr 14, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110003336">http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110003336</a> </li><li><b>The News We Kept to Ourselves</b><br />Eason Jordan (CNN chief), <i>New York Times</i>, Apr 11, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+News+We+Kept+to+Ourselves%22">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+News+We+Kept+to+Ourselves%22</a> </li><li><b>Bob Garfields's Interview with Eason Jordan</b><br />[Relevant to Foer’s "CNN's Access of Evil" above] <i>WNYC Radio</i>, Oct 25, 2002<br /><a href="http://www.wnyc.org/onthemedia/transcripts/transcripts_102502_jordan.html">http://www.wnyc.org/onthemedia/transcripts/transcripts_102502_jordan.html</a> </li><li><b>Air War - How Saddam Manipulates the U.S. Media</b><br />Franklin Foer, <i>The New Republic</i>, Posted Oct 16, 2002, Issue: Oct 28, 2002<br /><a href="http://foi.missouri.edu/polinfoprop/howsaddam.html">http://foi.missouri.edu/polinfoprop/howsaddam.html</a> </li>ForNownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-11279824485538333232007-05-09T06:00:00.000-04:002007-07-31T22:20:40.658-04:00Baghdad museum<li><b>What really happened at the Baghdad museum?</b><br />Dan Cruickshank, The <i>Guardian</i>, (UK), June 19, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,980368,00.html">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,980368,00.html</a> </li><li><b>Iraq's museums: what really happened</b><br />by Eleanor Robson, The <i>Guardian</i> (UK), June 18, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/features/story/0,11710,980042,00.html">http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/features/story/0,11710,980042,00.html</a> </li><li><b>Staff revolt at Baghdad museum</b><br />Rory McCarthy, The <i>Guardian</i> (UK), June 17, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,979087,00.html">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,979087,00.html</a> </li><li><b>Hoaxes, Hype and Humiliation</b><br />Charles Krauthammer, <i>Washington Post</i>, June 13, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/krauthammer061303.asp">http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/krauthammer061303.asp</a> </li><li><b>Lost from the Baghdad museum: truth</b><br />David Aaronovitch, The <i>Guardian</i> (UK), June 10, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,974194,00.html">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,974194,00.html</a> </li><li><b>All Along, Most Iraqi Relics Were 'Safe and Sound'</b><br />William Booth & Guy Gugliotta, The <i>Washington Post</i>, June 9, 2003 (Filed June 8, 2003)<br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;amp;amp;amp;node=&contentId=A32129-2003Jun8&amp;notFound=true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;amp;node=&contentId=A32129-2003Jun8&amp;notFound=true</a> </li><li><b>Most Iraqi Treasures Recovered</b><br />William Booth, The <i>Washington Post</i>, Page A22, June 8, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+biggest+prize+so+far%22+Nimrud">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+biggest+prize+so+far%22+Nimrud</a></li>ForNownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8171955337638911505.post-73010688095677062762007-05-08T18:33:00.003-04:002008-06-13T11:00:41.198-04:00Senate Intelligence Committee political memo 2003<li><b>Democrats Mull Politicizing Iraq War Intelligence</b><br /><em>Fox News</em>, Wed, Nov 5, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102206,00.html">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102206,00.html</a></li><li><strong>Raw Data: Dem Memo on Iraq Intel</strong><br /><em>Fox News</em>, Thu, Nov 6, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102258,00.html">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102258,00.html</a></li><li><b>Heads Should Roll Over Politicizing Iraqi Intelligence</b><br />Senator Zell Miller (D-Georgia), Fri, Nov 7, 2003, Senate Office Press Release, (now at <em>FrontPageMagazine.com</em>)<br /><a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=10682">http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=10682</a></li><li><b>A Political Threat to U.S. Security</b><br />Bob Kerrey (former U.S. Senator (D-Nebraska) & former vice-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee), The <i>New York Post</i>, Fri, Nov 7, 2003<br /><small>Note: this article does not appear in the NY Post's own online archive search.</small><br /><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040219074723/http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/10137.htm">http://web.archive.org/web/20040219074723/http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/10137.htm</a></li><li><b>Flagrantly Dishonest': Even the Senate Intelligence Committee isn't safe from Democratic partisanship.</b><br />[Calls for firing of minority staff director &amp; former Clinton Admin. member Christopher Mellon]<br />Editorial, <i>Opinion Journal</i> (WSJ), Fri, Nov 7, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004277">http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004277</a></li><li><b>Transcript: Pat Roberts on 'FOX News Sunday'</b><br /><i>Fox News</i> with Tony Snow, Sun, Nov 9, 2003 [with quote of Sen. Evan Bayh: "Senator Rockefeller has been under intense pressure -- intense pressure -- by some others to pursue a much more partisan line...."]<br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102590,00.html">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102590,00.html</a></li><li><b>What Memo?: The reason the mainstream media is downplaying the Democratic Senate Intelligence Committee memo is because it implicates mainstream journalists.</b><br />Hugh Hewitt, <i>The Weekly Standard</i>, Nov 13, 2003<br /><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/371hncft.asp">http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/371hncft.asp</a></li><li><b>Ruining the Intelligence Committee: Partisan animosity that has brought operations of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence to a standstill reached new depths on the early evening of Nov. 5.</b><br />Robert Novak, <i>Townhall.com</i>, Nov 17, 2003,<br /><a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/11/17/ruining_the_intelligence_committee">http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/11/17/ruining_the_intelligence_committee</a></li><li><b>Transcript: Sen. Jay Rockefeller on Fox News Sunday</b><br />Interview choice corrected - I had a July 2003 interview here but this is the right one.<br />In this interview, Rockefeller claims that Bush had said that there was an imminent threat from Iraq. Snow counters him with evidence to the contrary, including where Bush said in the 2003 State of the Union that we should NOT wait for the threat to become imminent. Then Snow quotes Rockefeller himself having said, a year earlier (Oct 10, 2002), that the question of imminence itself was outdated ever since 9/11/01 -- so how could Rockefeller have misconstrued what Bush said? Jay Rockefeller is now the head of the no-longer non-partisan Senate Intelligence Committee.<br /><i>Fox News</i> with Tony Snow, Sun, Oct 12, 2003 [Background on Rockefeller's thinking]<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22he+talked+about+imminent+threat.+And+he+never+did%22&filter=0">http://www.google.com/search?q=%22he+talked+about+imminent+threat.+And+he+never+did%22&filter=0</a></li>ForNownoreply@blogger.com