tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7921207.post-221879161446270352007-05-03T20:51:00.000-04:002007-05-03T21:23:22.440-04:00Reasons why Spider-Man 3 will not be good.</p><br /><br /><p>1) Too many villains. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bane_(comics)" target="_blank">Bane</a> of all bad superhero movies (and a few of the good ones.) Have you seen the Batman franchise? If your villain can't support a movie by himself, find a new villian.</p><br /><br /><p>2) One of those villains is played by Topher Grace. Just because you screwed up by not picking him to play your lead seven years ago, don't compound your mistake by miscasting him in this one.</p><br /><br /><p>3) One of those villains is made out of sand. Batman has gone ten deep already and Clayface is still on the bench. What does that tell you?</p><br /><br /><p>4) It took me a long time to figure out why bloggers kept calling Kirsten Dunst "Snaggletooth." Then I realized that she has a snaggletooth. Now I can't look at her without thinking about it. Oh, and the "Go get 'em, Tiger" was just awful.</p><br /><br /><p>5) This picture right here.</p><br /><br /><img src="http://www.precogs.net/images/070503_spidey.jpg" title="Oooooh ... subtle." /><br /><br /><p>See, the reflection symbolizes the character's inner conflict. I know this because I took the same film classes at Michigan State that Sam Raimi did.</p><br /><br /><p>6) The lead character is basically a fucking cartoon. What hath CGI wrought?</p><br /><br /><p><b>Rating: 6.4</b> It won't be awful ... but it won't be great either. Even though it could have been. Which is the real shame</p>Dashiellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18132700850229969130noreply@blogger.com