"ANONYMOUS" IS THE KKK OF THE INTERNET

COLBY SCHOOLCRAFT: ARMED AND DANGEROUS?

2009-12-08T10:34:00.000-08:00

Suspected "lone wolf" terrorist Colby Schoolcraft (more like "sad puppy" if you ask me) got his guns back, according to several of his "Anonymous" cohorts:

(Formerly anonymous "Anonymous" member
Colby Schoolcraft, suspected "lone wolf terrorist" )

Whether or not he will attend future anti-Scientology hate marches armed to the teeth with assault rifles remains to be seen. While it may not be illegal to print out pictures of ones enemies and attach them to watermelons for AK-47 target practice, doing so immediately after a hate march is very suspicious from a counter-terrorism point of view. We can only hope that Colby Schoolcraft's state of mind was deescalated by his recent arrest and that he isn't just biding his time, anxious for revenge.

Tom Newton

RELATED:

"ANONYMOUS" TERRORIST PLOT FOILED

ANONYMOUS DISCUSSION ABOUT PEDOPHILE KEITH HENSON

2009-12-07T07:41:00.000-08:00

In a post derided by WhyWeProtest.net ( Anonymous' own "Ministry of Truth") board moderators as "Keith Henson Trashing," Anonymous members discuss whether or not they should believe that anti-Scientologist Keith Henson should be considered a child molester.

Most members are in denial about it. They find it easier to ignore Keith Henson's perverted sexual proclivities and focus on their shared hatred for Scientologists. Many of them simply write off the accusations as nothing more than Scientology Secret Agents spreading lies to defame their critics (sort of like how Anonymous members libel their own critics as child molesters, drug users, etc).

I understand that Anonymous wants to retain the illusion of possessing some kind of moral high ground from which it can lash out at its enemies with impunity, but defending a convicted pedophile is not only reprehensible but, in Henson's case, it's ludicrous.

To claim that Keith Henson is not a pedophile makes as much sense as saying that Donald "The Angry Gay Dope" Myers isn't a homosexual, or that Anonymous isn't a hate group. It's futile and it only further reveals how far they are willing to go to deceive their own members, and the public.

(Anonymous members often bring their children to the protests, despite the presence of sex offenders, homosexuals, and terrorists.)

Tom Newton

ANONYMOUS TERRORISTS TO "NUKE" A COPY OF DIANETICS

2009-12-06T00:12:00.000-08:00

Now that Anonymous has officially launched the "Scientology Sucks" video contest, many of the anti-Scientology thugs are already busily preparing their own entries. Once such miscreant has offered the suggestion that someone should cook a copy of DIANETICS in a microwave:

If it happens, it would be the third time this year that one of them destroyed a religious text.

Tom Newton

ANONYMOUS HOSTING ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY HATE CONTEST

2009-12-03T11:04:00.000-08:00

Anonymous is offering $400 at www.AnonContest.org for the best Anti-Scientology video:

"Scientology Sucks: A Contest"

EDIT: COMMENT FROM AN UNREPENTANT BIGOT:

"Oh thanks for the free ad space, Tom. I was actually considering emailing you so you could put out contest up on your site.

Hey, want to participate? Promise we wont discriminate.

Cheers! -
AnonContest.org team,
NYC Anonymous"

Tom Newton

ANONYMOUS DECLARES "ANON-ORANGE" AND THE "ANGRY GAY DOPE" AS "SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS"

2009-12-02T23:28:00.000-08:00

As I have been pointing out since the very beginning of Anonymous' Campaign of Hate and Terror against Scientologists, they consistently accuse those they persecute of the exact crimes and abuses of which they are themselves quite guilty.

This includes stalking, retaliation, the silencing of critics, frivolous lawsuits, and now the practice of "disconnecting" from those members who no longer serve the interests of the collective. The practice of shunning and ostracizing members who fail to live up to the standards of the group is a common facet in all social organizations, but is especially pronounced in gangs and cults. Anonymous falls into the latter category, having achieved "cult status" long before their actual attacks against Scientology.

Although they claim not to be an organization, they have still proclaimed Donald "The Angry Gay Dope" Myers and "Anon-Orange" as excommunicated from Anonymous. Both have already been targeted with harassment and libelous attacks. It's only a matter of time until we see "ex-Anonymous" members picketing against Anonymous as Anonymous pickets against Scientologists. Behind each group of activists shouting down other groups of activists, there are ever increasing numbers of layers as each of these groups splinter off into factions.

Anonymous claims to have split up into those who protest Scientology and those who commit cyber-crime. "Old Guard" Anti-Scientology activists have merged with Anonymous, yet remain apart. Many Anonymous agitators achieve enough e-fame to become activists in their own right, no longer submerged into the collective.

A myriad of doctrinal differences lead into increasingly divergent sects with a variety of goals and agendas. However you look at it, the Anti-Scientology Racket, far from being a viable activist group with an eventual goal, no longer exists as a monolithic, effective movement. Faction after faction, these divisions are united only by their hatred for Scientology, each one merely a layer in what constitutes what might best be described as one massive onion of stupidity.

Tom Newton

RELATED:

ANONYMOUS MUTATES INTO THE "OSA AGENTS" THEY FEAR

"ANON-ORANGE" AND THE "ANGRY GAY DOPE" TURN ON ANO...

TOM NEWTON TO BE SUED BY ANONYMOUS MEMBER!

2009-12-02T11:55:00.000-08:00

Insignificant social-reject Jonathan Simmons has threatened to sue me over my commentary on a video he made in which he described a friend's homemade pornography to a Scientologist:

"Hi Tom,

Your comments on my blog are great and all, but I wasn't the guy who had sex with that scientologist chica. I heard she was great, though.

Nobody cares that I talked to "elderly" Gwen Barnard (DSA Portland) about that. They're laughing. And I'm laughing that you called her "elderly".

Anyways, have fun with that. Keep up the good work.

- Jon"

"Tom:

Also, you do know and understand that the information in your post about me is incorrect.

I posted a comment trying to correct that information, and you disregarded my comment. Please change your information to the correct information. If you do not, I will retain a lawyer and press charges for libel.

You know what libel is, so please correct your defamatory post about me. I think thirty (30) days is enough to change that info. Please contact me if you would like any more info.

- Jon"

AN OPEN LETTER TO JONATHAN SIMMONS:

IF YOU WANT ME TO REVISE MY POSTS ABOUT YOU, THEN I ASK THAT YOU TALK TO YOUR ANONYMOUS FRIENDS ABOUT REMOVING THE FOLLOWING DEFAMATORY POSTS ABOUT SCIENTOLOGISTS ON ANONYMOUS ATTACK-SITE "ENCYCLOPEDIA DRAMATICA." LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU HAVE TAKEN CARE OF THIS, AND I WILL GLADLY REMOVE THE POSTS I WROTE ABOUT YOU AND YOUR PATHETIC LIFE:

"SCILONS: L. Ron Hubbard - David Miscarriage - Tom Cruise - Scientology Agents - Footbullet Man - Rogues Gallery - Suri Cruise - Terryeo - Heaven's Gate - The Regime - Evil Jacket Guy - Joe Feshbach - VaLLarrr - Jonathan Barbera Danny Masterson - Jada Pinkett Smith - Kirstie Alley - Tommy Davis - Oschaper - Kendrick Moxon Cary Goulston - Jan Maturbongs - Stephan Hittmann"

Tom Newton

STREET GANGS DECLARE WAR ON ANONYMOUS

2009-11-30T23:46:00.000-08:00

A few days ago, Anonymous members stalked and harassed a gang member because he criticized them on his video blog. He was "fed to the chans" as they say. Apparently, he didn't take their cyber-bullying lightly:

Tom Newton

"ANON-ORANGE" AND THE "ANGRY GAY DOPE" TURN ON ANONYMOUS

2009-11-30T23:16:00.001-08:00

Anon-Orange and Donald "The Angry Gay Dope" Myers, two of the Anti-Scientology Racket's greatest liabilities (and drama queens) are fed up with those uppity, no-name Anonymous members:

Isn't it sad when hate-mongers turn on their own kind? :(

Tom Newton

MORE RACIST SLANG FROM ANONYMOUS: "NIGGER-BAIT"

2009-11-29T19:13:00.001-08:00

Have you ever met non-racists who used the term "niggerbait" to describe a woman's buttocks? Would you consider Anonymous to be racists based upon the following exchange?:

"..oh and btw, check out the pooper on that bitch, tell me this isn't niggerbait" -- James Smith:

"wow who knew she was packing so much junk in her trunk." --Anon123456

(SOURCE: http://forums.whyweprotest.net/7-chit-chat/death-threat-video-57485/14/)

The Anonymous member "Anon123456" has the following animated gif as his avatar:

IF YOU'VE GOT A HOLE, I'LL POOP IN IT!

These are some real brainy individuals to be sure, but the question remains: ARE THEY RACISTS?

Tom Newton

GANG MEMBER THREATENS TO SHOOT ANONYMOUS MEMBERS

2009-11-28T20:28:00.000-08:00

This does seem to be a credible threat:

You can't say that they didn't instigate this:

Tom Newton

ANONYMOUS TO ATTACK MORMONISM NEXT!

2009-11-27T19:43:00.000-08:00

"When we get done with Scientology, we'll go after that #1 cult in the US: Mormonism."
--Francois Choquette, Anonymous member and agent provocateur

Here is an interesting development. Anonymous is planning to attack Mormonism next according to Francois Choquette:

Choquette, pronounced "choke it," is a self-described religious bigot and proud recipient of a Cease and Desist letter from the Church of Scientology. As "AnonOrange," he made national headlines after security guards at a Scientology Gold Base forcefully restrained him during an Anonymous Hate Rally. (That incident was the third time Choquette provoked his own arrest as an Anonymous).

It should come as no surprise that these freelance bigots are targeting Mormons next. I predicted this development over a year and half ago. For those of you who are new to this blog, the reason why the Anti-Scientology Racket (a term coined by Mark "Wise Beard" Bunker), is described as a racket is because the high profile protesters and anti-Scientology website owners are able to generate substantial amounts of money from their activities.

What is particularly hypocritical about Anonymous' defamation of Mormonism is their allegation that Mormons are racist:

"...This is basically a KKK and money driven version of christianity that says that God loves America more than any other place." -- Anonymous

Aside from disseminating their "Nigger-Manual" to school children across America, Anonymous members have also launched racist attacks against websites which celebrate black culture:

"AllHipHop and SOHH, two pioneering Web sites that have been in the industry for over 10 years, are appalled by the unprovoked racist attacks of these cyber terrorists."-- MTV Spokesperson

SOHH CEO Felicia Palmer who was personally attacked stated that the FBI is investigating this case, and that the "hackers are specifically targeting Black, Hispanic, Asian and Jewish youth who ascribe to hip-hop culture".

Should they expand their anti-religion activism beyond Scientology and Islam, Anon-Orange and his ilk are going to have to dig deeper than merely alleging that Mormonism is a cult or that Mormons are racist. Terms like "racist" and "cultist" simply don't mean a whole lot coming from a cult of racists.

Tom Newton

ANONYMOUS MUTATES INTO THE "OSA AGENTS" THEY FEAR

2009-11-27T01:54:00.000-08:00

"Battle not with monsters lest you become one." ---Friedrich Nietzsche

“This is no different than other forms of organized crime."—Ron Astor, describing "Anonymous"

There was a time when Scientology "OSA Agents" were said to stalk church enemies. It was claimed that they would distribute libelous fliers in the neighborhoods of their critics and use dirty tricks and tactics such as creepy prank calls, intimidation, threats, slander, and frivolous civil lawsuits in order to silence all criticism.

Allegedly, this is reason why Anonymous members conceal their faces behind scary masks:

Oddly enough, Anonymous members have done, still do, and will indefinitely continue to do exactly each and every one of the above tactics. Not that they would ever admit to it. You can fully expect them to deny their involvement in any of the criminal mischief I listed.

The usual pattern works like this:

1) One or more of Anonymous' crimes are documented on this blog.
2) Anonymous denies all involvement.
3) I provide hotlinks to evidence of the crime being discussed.
4) Anonymous members admit to wrong doings.
5) Anonymous members attack me personally.
6) Anonymous members conspire to continue to stalk, harass, and slander me, and all of their critics.

Watch. I will document this process as this post develops...

(to be continued....)

1) I provided a general list of what Anonymous members do to earn the title "hate group," and how they are exactly the same as the "OSA Agent" straw man they claim to hide from.

2) Denial, in this case, has occurred in the form of an Anonymous attempting to argue that there is no Anonymous, but rather a collection of "cells":

"...To say that we act as one is then stupid, as you know that we act as cells. And as previously stated, some cells are more edgy and extreamist than others. I do believe thats checkmate, as to ignore this supporting fact is to be compleatly ignorant of what you post upon this blog...."

This is the same semantic loophole used by terrorist groups around the world. It's a transparent, disingenuous, and cowardly attempt to avoid responsibility.

3) Here are the charges I leveled at them, accompanied by hotlinks:

a) Cyberstalking: Anonymous Cyber-Stalking
b) Slander: Anonymous Slander and libel
c) Threats: Death Threats/ Rape Threats
d) Libelous Fliers: Anonymous passes out libelous fliers while committing indecent exposure
e) Prank Phone Calls: Perverted prank calls to Scientologists
f) Frivolous Lawsuits:Attacking Scientology with lawsuits

4) ANONYMOUS WILL ADMIT TO COMMITTING THE CRIMES LISTED IN #3:

"Tom, I am not questioning your intelligence, i am merely saying that we do not all act as one. Sure, people prank call Scientology orgs, but not all of us do... i for one think it is a bad idea to do prank calls because it does not help anyone. others may think it is a good idea because they obtain 'lulz.'" - Mike (anti-Scientologist, Anonymous supporter/ member)

Here again is a clear admission of guilt, AFTER the denials. Additionally, this is yet another sad attempt at denial of responsibility. This person, like all Anonymous, are so caught up in their farce that they don't believe that they are a cohesive group. This would be analogous to a group of terrorists calling themselves the "Not-Terrorists," and then committing acts of terror while claiming plausible deniability because their of ther name. Yes, Anonymous truly is that superficial, and that stupid.

5) ANONYMOUS WILL ATTACK ME PERSONALLY:

"...dick sucking nigger." --Anonymous
"...TOMS A DICK SUCKING NIGGER FAGGOT JEW ENABLER..." --Anonymous

Some anonymous creep decided that since he couldn't refute my points, he'd just call me a "dick sucking nigger." Personally, I don't know anyone with such a disgusting and degrading set of epithets at their disposal. I personally would never have combined those words in that way.

Anonymous members may prance around and pay lip-service to the concept of free speech, but the reality is, they are just an obscene mob seeking to ram their perversions down the throats of decent, hard-working people. In other words, Typical Liberal Fascists.

6) ANONYMOUS WILL PROCLAIM THAT THEY SHALL CONTINUE THEIR HATE CAMPAIGN, DESPITE THE FACT THAT PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP TO THE TRUTH ABOUT THEM:

"...lets face the facts tom scientology is going down and you know it, no matter how many blog posts you make it NEVER change that..." --Anonymous

Finally, #6: Anonymous ignores the fact that they've been exposed for their criminal mischief (again) and proclaim their undying devotion to their stated goal of destroying the religion of Scientology.

Tom Newton

"PORN-DAY": ANONYMOUS CYBER-BULLIES SHOW PORNOGRAPHY TO CHILDREN

2009-11-24T17:24:00.001-08:00

Hundreds of Anonymous members joined forces and successfully exposed countless children to explicit, pornographic videos. I will be posting details about this particular cyber-crime but first, in order to make a point, I'll be waiting a few hours before I do.

In the mean time, I will be observing the comments on this particular post. As you will see, Anonymous members always cover up for each other. I will be posting their lies and rationalizations below:

1) RATIONALIZATION: "...they did do it but ages ago. it was called 'porn day' or something. are you stuck like 6 months in the past?" --(comment by Anonymous member trolling as Adam Westwood)

2) RATIONALIZATION: "...There are more entities of anonymous than you could ever imagine. Some protest, some troll, some expose children to adult material. None are the same anonymous, but some members stem across the different groups, leading to a lot of confusion over "which anonymous is which". Another level of confusion can be derived from the fact that not even protesting anons are all the same. Some are more hostile and extremist, some are docile and aim to educate." --Anonymous

3) RATIONALIZATION: "...So you mean to tell me that all muslims are going to fly jets into sky scrapers? All alcoholics are going to shoot their families? All women are scandalist whores?" --Anonymous

4) PERVERT APOLOGIST: "...Are you fucking kidding me? like the kids on the internet these days havn't seen porn already....Kids now 8-12+ even teens do "sexting" which involves sending nude or lude images of themself via cellphone to others, all the fucking time." --Anonymous

The fact that I can predict their responses speaks for itself.

1) As you can see from RATIONALIZATION #1, it has been admitted that Anonymous exposed thousands of children to hard-core pornography as a prank. However, this person reasons that since it happened six months ago, it no longer counts. That's like saying that drugging and raping a thirteen year old shouldn't be a punishable offense unless it can be proven to be an actual"rape-rape," rather than just a"rape."

2) The second RATIONALIZATION seeks to differentiate between various factions within Anonymous. This explanation makes no sense. If, as this commenter claims, Anonymous is truly an amorphous collective of random individuals who just happen to protest the church month after month, year after year, and if they truly remain mysterious to one another, then how is any one member to know the exact demographics at any given moment?

How is one to know that the group changed its character from one that preys upon innocent children to one that seeks to right perceived social injustices? If there is no consensus, then there is no way to claim that the group is one thing but not another. Anonymous cannot claim to be moral busybodies but not child molesters. If its composition is unknowable and antithetical to the structure of an organized body, then its members have no right to claim any sort of standard.

The manner in which they define themselves is entirely fallacious, self-serving, and laughable. Anyone with half a thetan knows that it's the same high-school drop-out basement dwellers week after week, year after year. RATIONALIZATION #2 FAILED.

3) RATIONALIZATION #3 FAILS as well. What that particular poster doesn't comprehend is that not all generalizations are bad. I think we can all agree that gang members are violent. Certainly not ALL are, but we can generalize. Gangs are violent by nature. Nobody would dispute this fact. When a group exhibits certain patterns of behavior, it's perfectly okay to use that empirical data and formulate generalities. Anonymous members have consistently used pornography to offend people of all ages. This, sadly, is how they advocate free speech--by pushing boundaries. It's the same mentality that makes them burn religious texts.

This also reaffirms a point which I am obliged make time and time again: that Anonymous upholds many extremely hypocritical double standards. They generalize about Scientologists in everyone of their baseless smear campaigns, yet refuse allow any impartial observer (or blogger) to make generalizations about their own organization. These so-called "free speech advocates" will violently go after anyone who attempts to do so.

4) In regards to the PERVERT APOLOGIST #4, the idea that kids have already seen pornography and are therefore unharmed by it is wrong on many levels. This commenter is pure evil. This is the bad side of moral relativism. I'm sure that many pedophiles would share this person's views. Just because some kids have seen pornography at a young age doesn't mean that we should GENERALIZE that ALL kids have seen it. And if that were the case, it still would not justify indecently exposing children to pornographic videos. The person who made this comment (anonymously of course) would also argue that I am wrong for generalizing about Anonymous. To this terribly flawed person, Anonymous members cannot be generalized into categories, even when they demonstrate a consistency in their deeds and words, yet children can be generalized as highly sexed consumers of pornography.

What really bothers me about the PERVERT APOLOGIST is how he authoritatively states that kids ages 8-12 trade nude pictures of themselves "all the time." HOW IN THE WORLD DOES HE KNOW THIS?

FINALLY, HERE IS THE BBC REPORT ON ANONYMOUS' "PORN DAY":

Tom Newton

AVOWED PEDOPHILE "MARK FISHER" JOINS "ANONYMOUS HATE GROUP"

2009-11-22T19:07:00.000-08:00

Something I've observed over the years: the kind of people who conceal their faces with masks and "demonstrate" against one scapegoat or another usually share a few traits:

1) They generally have a history of anti-social behaviors.

2) They tend to gravitate towards amorality and anarchy.

3) They seem to prey upon on the vulnerable and the defenseless.

Mark Fisher, an avowed pedophile, is no exception. He has recently begun showing up at "Anonymous" hate demonstrations against the Church of Scientology, but as you can see, he couldn't find a mask large enough to conceal his corpulent mug:

Like Anonymous members who routinely engage in cyber-bullying, Mark Fisher has no problem with exploiting the vulnerable or defenseless. Take, for example, his own admitted treatment of underage prostitutes in third-world countries. Fisher's website, (now defunct) bachelorfreedomtravel.com, boasted of his escapades. Below is a sampling of the kind of advice Fisher offered to other desperate sex-seekers:

“I here also is a bar called the -Kangaroo Bar. I his may sound like an Australian bar where you can get a cold beer, but trust me, the main attraction is the girls giving the men oral sex under their bar stools out in the open! (I told you Thailand is wild!)

“Thailand Tip - Always practice safe sex in Thailand!

“Thailand Tip - Be sure to try out the “ladyboys” known as “katoeys”. They look like some of the most beautiful women you have ever seen! It's better than a real woman!

“The best part of the Safari (or any Go Go Bar) is the fact that you can take anyone of the girls home with you to your hotel for a night of fun! Unless you are rude and obnoxious, they will NEVER SAY NO!!!

“Choose your girl and then you will have to pay a “bar fine” of 500-600 baht ($14 - $17) to the bar in order to let the girl go home with you. This bar fine is supposed to compensate the bar for the lost income they would have gotten if the girl stayed and worked selling drinks

“Then it is off to your hotel or wherever you like Dancing? Drinking? Dinner? Whatever you like, but you always will end up at your hotel room, where she will do whatever you want in the bedroom. Be sure that you negotiate with the girl before you leave the bar to find out what she will do and also how much she will expect to be tipped.

“The going rate for a “short time” session (which is a few hours out on the town and in your hotel, but not sleeping over) is anywhere from 1,000 baht on the low end to 2,000 baht for a really superstar quality girl.
The going rate for a “long time” session (which is having the girl go out with you and spend the night in your hotel all night long) is between 2,000 baht on the low end to 3,500 baht on the high end.

“Remember, everything is negotiable! If you think the girl is asking too much, tell her you only have a little bit of money and offer it. She probably will take it.

“Then it is off to your night on the town. Remember when you take a girl out in Thailand, you are also expected to pay for everything - food, drinks, taxi’s etc. And it is also proper to give the girl an additional 100 baht for taxi fare when she heads home.

“Don’t forget. Always practice safe sex!! Most girls will demand that you wear a condom. Have your own with you. I have found that the Thai condoms are too small for Western men!! Bring your favorite brand from your home country. If you forget, buy some condoms at the pharmacies. The brand to get are Durex “Comfort”. These are larger sized condoms and are safe.

“But in Thailand, the Land of Smiles, you spend $60 to $75 dollars and are guaranteed action at the end of the night! And it will be service with a smile!!”

As Anonymous would say, "MARK FISHER HAS EARNED THE PEDOBEAR SEAL OF APPROVAL":

"Byrdes of on kynde and color flok and flye allwayes together." -William Turner

Tom Newton

RELATED POST:

ANONYMOUS IS A HATE GROUP: "PEDO-BEAR" APPROVES OF KEITH HENSON

THE ARROGANCE OF ANONYMOUS

2009-11-22T11:32:00.000-08:00

The most disturbing thing about Anonymous is their arrogance. Truth, to them, is of absolutely no consequence. One of their members could shoot up a shopping mall and the rest would still blame it on Scientology. Or, they would claim that the attack was an isolated incident with no connection to the rest of the group, or its ideology.

They are so arrogant that they sincerely believe that whatever they say is the truth is the truth. If they say that they aren't cyber-bullies, they expect to be believed. Evidence has no bearing on their version of reality. They are as arrogant as any Holocaust Denier. They share the same hypocritical self-righteousness displayed by racist organizations all over the world.

Anonymous wasn't always this way. They used to revel in their mischief and the reputation it earned them. Now, as self identified "moral-fags," they insist that they are paragons of morality. How any sane person can take on such a title while engrossed in mock child porn, cyber-bullying, and anti-religion extremism is beyond me.

Their actions speak louder than their words. Their actions have branded them as a hate group. Their words reveal them to be arrogant, self-righteous, hypocrites.

Tom Newton

RELATED POST:

ANONYMOUS SENDS YOUTUBE VIDEO DEATH THREAT TO SCIENTOLOGISTS

GENOCIDAL BIGOT BILL HANDEL GAINS POPULARITY WITH ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY ACTIVISTS

2009-11-20T20:38:00.000-08:00

Radio "shock jock" Bill Handel had a problem. Every time he engaged in one of his classic Islamophobic, homophobic, anti-Semitic, or racist rants, he would end up having to apologize for it later. It must have been getting tiresome having to constantly tell people that he's only "mocking bigotry" when he issues statements such as:

"And when I look at a box of Wheaties, all right? I don't want to see eyes that are like all slanted and Oriental and almond shaped. I want American eyes looking at me."

Why should Bill Handel, who has his own Star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, have to explain that it's merely satire to claim that Muslims never bathe and often have sex with camels? It's not his fault that people get offended by his "satire." Earlier this year, millions were offended by his comments on a show about health care, in which he stated that the US government should "euthanize old people." People need to learn to lighten up.

So what if he suggested that Glendale should be sold "to get rid of the Armenians," or that we should "get rid of the Irish and the Italians" as well? What's the big deal? If we can't joke about genocide and bestiality while making fun of the eyes on Asian people, then what can we joke about?

Thankfully, Bill Handel found a new, accepted scapegoat: SCIENTOLOGY.

Like many other failed entertainers lurking on the fringe, Bill Handel is tapping into the Anti-Scientology market in hopes of giving his career a boost. I wish him luck with that. However, in regards to the clip above, Bill has absolutely no clue what he is talking about. Not that that will make any difference. The Anti-Scientology crowd isn't known for its critical thinking.

Tom Newton

ANONYMOUS BURNS THE KORAN. HATE CRIME INVESTIGATION PENDING...

2009-11-19T12:48:00.001-08:00

I have reported the following video to the authorities. This is definitely a hate crime. It just remains to be seen whether or not Anonymous will get away with it:

This is the most offensive video Anonymous has released since they beheaded a Statue of Liberty replica earlier this year:

EDIT: I NO LONGER SUPPORT THE VIEW THAT THIS WAS A "HATE CRIME." IN LIGHT OF RECENT RESEARCH, I AM NO LONGER IN FAVOR OF HATE CRIME LEGISLATION, AS IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO LIMIT FREE SPEECH. HOWEVER, I RETAIN MY POSITION THAT THIS DEPLORABLE ACT DOES IN FACT REVEAL THE CONTEMPT ANONYMOUS HAS FOR ALL RELIGIONS. 11-28-2009

Tom Newton

RELATED:

ANONYMOUS BURNING SCIENTOLOGY BOOKS

2 MORE ANONYMOUS CONVICTIONS. 8998 TO GO

2009-11-19T11:10:00.000-08:00

Dmitriy Guzner was sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison for participating in Anonymous' initial cyber-attack against the Church of Scientology's website. Additionally,the judge ordered him to pay $37,500 in restitution.

Brian Thomas Mettenbrink was indicted by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles on charges connected to the same cyber-assault.

What should be understood from these two examples is that the only reason that ALL Anonymous members haven't been convicted of cyber-crimes is that they haven't all been caught.

The true reason they hide their identities isn't because they fear retribution from the Scientologists and Muslims they offend. They hide because they are engaged in illegal activities.

Tom Newton

Source: http://www.nj.com/news/local/index.ssf/2009/11/verona_teen_sentenced_to_a_yea.html

ANONYMOUS BURNING SCIENTOLOGY BOOKS

2009-11-19T03:03:00.000-08:00

Anonymous members consider themselves to be free speech activists. They also believe themselves to be "rescuing" the Scientologists they persecute. Whether they are misguided heroes or simply opportunistic hate mongers, one thing is for sure...

They are not advocating free speech. Only abusing it:

Tom Newton

ANONYMOUS SMASHES WINDOW OF QUEBEC CITY ORG

2009-11-18T18:13:00.001-08:00

Once again, some of the more mentally unbalanced Canadian members of the hate-mob known as "Anonymous" have destroyed Church of Scientology property:

It's difficult to tell if this was done with a gun, a slingshot, or perhaps with a metal baseball bat.

One thing for sure is that this has happened before at this same Org, and they have since installed security cameras. Hopefully they catch the person or persons responsible and prosecute them accordingly.

Tom Newton

16 MORE ANONYMOUS MEMBERS IDENTIFIED

2009-11-17T02:12:00.001-08:00

The following is a list of Anonymous members who were just identified on Hollywood Boulevard, as posted on the forums at ReligiousFreedomWatch.org:

Gary Scarff
Daniel Deluca
Patricia Curtis
Dan Cooke
Jeff Augustine
Tyler Wysocki
Doug Owens
Rigoberto Alvarado
Nick Stephens
Susan Elliot

Others were identified at the Grand Opening of the new Church of Scientology in Washington DC:

Margaret Myers
William McDonald
Brian Mandigo
Trever Jones
Miranda Walter
Melanie Walter

Tom Newton

Related:

RFW Reporting on Anonymous' Racism

ANONYMOUS THREATENS SCIENTOLOGY LAWYER WITH HIV VIRUS

2009-11-15T09:43:00.000-08:00

Just before soliciting donations, Anonymous agitator Donald "The Angry Gay Dope" Myers uses a video to demonstrate his intention to infect Scientology lawyer Kenneth Moxon with the dreaded HIV virus:

"New video: AGP dominates Moxon

from Why We Protest | Activism Forum by AngryGayPope1

NEW AGP VIDEO: Once again it comes down to the Angry Gay Pope to show Anonymous how to enturbulate. Here's my new video where I show Anonymous how to do it rite by giving Moxon the business! Watch and learn.

YouTube VIDEO: AGP ENGAGES MOXON:

If you want MOAR then lick my ling

VVVVVVVVVVVVVV

AGP skooling anonymous in doinitrite"

WILL SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT THIS HAS TO DO WITH PROTESTING THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY?

Tom Newton

"ANONYMOUS" TERRORIST PLOT FOILED

2009-11-10T12:02:00.000-08:00

(Formerly anonymous "Anonymous" member
Colby Schoolcraft, suspected "lone wolf terrorist" )

As I reported in a previous post (ANONYMOUS TERRORIST STOCKPILED ASSAULT RIFLES), an Anonymous member known as "Camera Anonymous" was arrested for threatening to "bomb" and "shoot up" a Church of Scientology Org:

"Metro SWAT officers and counterterrorism detectives stormed the southwest Las Vegas Valley home of Colby Schoolcraft in the middle of the night Oct. 15 and seized a cache of weapons and ammunition, including an AK-47 assault rifle."
Source: www.LasVegasSun.com

Las Vegas authorities believed that acts of violence were about to be committed against the local Scientology church. According to Lt. Kevin McMahill of Metro’s Counter Terrorism Section, they “...literally caught him in the act of loading his vehicle with the weapons."

According to FBI Supervisor Rod Swanson, who leads the Southern Nevada Joint Terrorism Task Force, "...authorities were concerned Schoolcraft might be acting as a lone wolf, beyond the control of his group."

Despite all of the above, Anonymous members are still donating money to Colby Schoolcraft's legal fund. In my opinion, every Anonymous donor should be investigated for aiding and abetting terrorism....

Tom Newton

ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY ACTIVIST JONATHAN SIMMONS DISCUSSES HOMEMADE PORN WITH SENIOR CITIZEN

2009-11-09T23:32:00.000-08:00

Anonymous member Jonathan Simmons, a videographer for KVAL (a CBS affiliate) is a total creep. Listen for a few seconds here as describes how he gawked at pornographic photographs of a Scientologist that his friend (another Anonymous member) took.

It's not clear if his friend has permission to take or distribute the photographs, but Simmons is certain that "it was stuck to her" and that she was "pretty hot":

Real classy. Discussing pornographic images with an elderly woman. But what else would you expect from an Anonymous member? They're ALL addicted to videogames and pornography. Jonathon Simmons, a University of Oregon dropout, logged over 425 hours playing games like "Grand Theft Auto,"Counter-Strike," and "Sim-City" alone:

Jonathon Simmons was gracious enough to answer my phone call (971-222-6323), but refused to disclose anymore details about the homemade-porn he was so willing to discuss with the Scientologist he was harassing at Portland's annual "Festival of Faith."

He thanked me for "Fair Gaming" him, although I don't understand how calling someones publicly listed phone number is any worse than passing around compromising images of strangers just because of their religious affiliation .

The more I get to know these hate-mongering cyber-bullies, the clearer it becomes that they don't care about helping "victims" of a "cult." That's all just a facade. The truth is, Anonymous members are just plain old bullies with advanced communications technologies. Without their gadgets, people like Jonathon Simmons are nothing but insignificant social-rejects.

Tom Newton

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

2009-11-09T17:11:00.000-08:00

(I do not truly wish to see Mark "The Wise Bearded Bigot" Bunker incinerated. This image was created to illustrate a point.)

If someone did this to your photo would you consider it a joke?

What if it was created by people who despised you? Would you find it disturbing then?

Members of the hate group Anonymous feel that by pushing the limits of free speech, they are somehow being virtuous. I disagree. In my opinion, the manner in which they deface and libel their enemies constitutes hate speech.

What do you think? Please comment below. Your comments are crucial to helping Anonymous members re-discover their moral compasses.

Tom Newton