tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post113649365553132118..comments2008-12-23T03:11:02.625-05:00Gene Callahanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10065877215969589482noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-43510258677622652902008-12-23T03:11:00.000-05:002008-12-23T03:11:00.000-05:00This is a regular company. They supply cheapest <A HREF="http://gameim.com/product/Mabinogi_Gold.html" REL="nofollow">mabinogi gold</A><BR/>I often visit the site.<A HREF="http://gameim.com/product/Mabinogi_Gold.html" REL="nofollow">cheap mabinogi</A><BR/><A HREF="http://gameim.com/product/Mabinogi_Gold.html" REL="nofollow">mabinogi money</A><BR/><A HREF="http://gameim.com/product/Mabinogi_Gold.html" REL="nofollow">buy mabinogi gold</A><BR/><A HREF="http://gameim.com/product/Mabinogi_Gold.html" REL="nofollow">mabinogi online gold</A> I am happy to buy their gold.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-1137060463513010552006-01-12T05:07:00.000-05:002006-01-12T05:07:00.000-05:00There are quite a few people out there who just parrot a line against ID that's been spoonfed to them by some prominent Darwinian.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-1136524556137153842006-01-06T00:15:00.000-05:002006-01-06T00:15:00.000-05:00Rather than start a new post, let me add here that I found another good piece of evidence that Behe is not a devious liar, but (at worst) genuinely wrong. <A HREF="http://www.arn.org/docs/behe/mb_toresp.htm" REL="nofollow">Here he is,</A> responding to some critics at Talk Origins. Now I ask you, does this sound like the ranting of an either incredibly ignorant or willfully deceptive academic? Maybe he's just that good at tricking me, but the more I read of this guy, the more I think he means well...<BR/><BR/>Behe:<BR/><BR/><I>In this group of posts I am repeatedly said to be "ignorant." That may be true, but I think there is reason to give me the benefit of the doubt. I have a Ph. D. in biochemistry from the University of Pennsylvania (received an award from Sigma Xi for "Best Thesis), postdoc'd for four years at the National Institutes of Health (as a Jane Coffin Childs Fund postdoctoral fellow), have been an academic biochemist for 14 years, have gained tenure at a reasonably rigorous university, have published a fair amount in the biochemical literature, and have continuously had my research funded by national agencies (including a five-year Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health) and currently have research funds.<BR/><BR/>Well, perhaps I am a real biochemist, but am simply "ignorant" of work on the evolution of irreducibly complex biochemical systems? Perhaps. But I am not unaware that evolution is a controversial subject, and certainly tried to cover all bases when researching and writing my book. I have no death wish. I do, after all, have to live with my departmental colleagues, a number of whom are Darwinists. So I searched the literature as thoroughly as I could for relevant information and tried to be as rigorous as possible. Perhaps there are step-by-step, Darwinian explanations in the literature for the complex systems I describe in my book, but if there are I haven't seen them, nor has anyone brought them to my attention.<BR/><BR/>My book has now been reviewed quite widely, including reviews by academic biochemists. Several of them were quite hostile to my idea of design, but all agreed that the systems I described are enormously complex and currently unexplained. The hostile reviewers were confident that the systems would eventually be explained by Darwinism in the future. I do not share their confidence. Neither did James Shapiro, a biochemist at the University of Chicago who reviewed Darwin's Black Box for National Review a few weeks ago. He, too, thinks Darwinism has failed for these systems, but hopes that they will be explained by some other non-intelligent mechanism.</I>Bobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04001108408649311528noreply@blogger.com