tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6822486724992411569.post-56841696769054094262008-02-06T20:55:00.000-05:002008-02-06T20:55:00.000-05:00Just a note on consistency - if Magnolia had a "mo...Just a note on consistency - if Magnolia had a "modest, but strong" showing of $22 million, it's odd to think that MI:3 "struggled" at the box office with $133 million - over six times Magnolia. For a trilogy, in which sequels generally suck, $133 million is beyond jackpot. And as for Lambs for Wolves' $15 million, that was just a bad movie, regardless of how the public feels about Tom Cruise. <BR/><BR/>I can't watch Cruise as an actor anymore, his public persona is too huge for us to ever see anything but Tom Cruise in a role. But to call $133 million a struggle isn't being realistic.rob getzschmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17087843873490874718noreply@blogger.com