DIRTY EUROPEAN SOCIALIST

FDR was the greatest president of the USA

2008-11-20T23:11:00.005Z

Why does FDR get such a bad press from the right wing in the USA. He ended the depression. He won WW2, won 4 elections and did all that in a wheelchair.
We are all ways told by Americans to be grateful for them winning WW2 yet the same people expect us to hate FDR. How do they work that one out? If the UK is supposed to be grateful to the USA for WW2 then why do we not thank the memory of FDR rather than see right wingers taking the credit for his decisions.
There are still American right "wingers" today who hate FDR and try and claim he did not end the depression. In reality the great depression was two depressions. 1929 -33 and another smaller one in the late thirties which ended well before WW2.
The right wing always make the excuse that only WW2 ended the great depression this is rubbish economic growth in the USA was rising before WW2.
The fact the thirties have been labelled as the great depression shows right wing bias over history it is an an attempt to pretend the depression lasted all of FDR reign.
There is well known myth spread by right wing people that the depression started well after the stock market crash. This is rubbish the depression started almost immediately after the 1929 wall street crash. Herbert Hoover had a massive economic depression which lasted his entire right wing presidency. The left wing took over and sorted it out. Look at the GDP growth figures and unemployment rates for the era.
The depression lasted 1929 -33 not through the entire 30s. It was socialist ideas that stopped the depression, yet right wing historians have used very clever tricks to hide this lesson from history.
The myth of the "1930s long depression" rather than the 1929 - 33 depression is one very clever trick by the right to actually blame the depression on FDR.
Another trick they play is to claim the depression only stopped when WW2 started. Well that is rubbish the depression had stopped well before then.
It shows history is written by the winners.
Plus FDR turned the USA into the number one world superpower. On any geopolitical nationalist basis Americans should see FDR as their greatest president.
Yet he does not get any of the credit he deserves. Reagan gets credit for winning the cold war, but FDR beat Hitler, Japan, and made the USA number one superpower.
Obama should big himself up as the new FDR. It is only biased traitors to the USA who do not see what a great American leader FDR was.
I hope Obama can do a good speech like FDR did on his inauguration.
:
I hope the loch Ness Monster does not invade Washington on the day of the Obama inauguration.
As then Obama 's line would have to be.
The only thing we have to fear is the big scary monster chasing after us. Ahhh!!!!!!

Yes We can tune

2008-11-20T23:09:00.000Z

This must be where obama got his idea for the yes we can tune.

Stop Oxbridge and public school snobbery to PM

2008-09-07T11:13:00.003+01:00

The PM is hated by the media because he did not go to Oxbridge or public school.
What is it about a non oxbridge educated - state educated Prime Minister that they hate?
I believe the bad press he continues to get is a conspiracy by the oxbridge public school elites to get rid of the PM as he is not one of theirs.
Most of the left wing newspapers are part of this conspiracy too. As most of them are dominated by Oxbridge types too.
There have only been two times since WW2 that both the chancellor AND the PM did not go to Oxford. That is the Lamont and Major government, plus the present government.
Even then Lamont went to Cambridge. So this is the first non Oxbridge PM - chancellor team since the war.
Is the real cause of the presses hatred to the PM simply he is not oe of their own?
He does not talk the right way, or have the correct Oxbridge mannerisms they are used to recognising. I always used to wonder why are the press do damning about the PM performances in PM's question time. Too me he does not do that bad. But is the problem he does not have the Oxbridge specifically Oxford mannerisms that Oxbridge people respect?
The domination of the British political scene by Oxbridge especially Oxford cannot be an accident. Since WW2 of the 12 PMs since WW2 8 went to Oxford.

I honestly believe the cause of the presses hatred to the PM is simply because he did not go to Oxbridge or public school.
For instance how many regurgitated unsourced fake stories do we get putting down the government. If this was an Oxbridge PM such unsourced drivel stories would not be tolerated in a serious newspaper but this PM is fair game for the Oxbridge elites.
John Major had a similar hatred from the press largely as he was not one of their own. He only won in 1992 because he was up again Kinnock who was also state educated non Oxbridge.
The best way to get the media on your side is to have a public school educated Oxford candidate as the press will be on your side. He will have the correct mannerisms and style for the elites

The Tory leader gets an easy press from the media especially the left wing media. The cocaine allegation questions have never been repeated. He is assumed to be a nice guy as he has the manner and style they relate to. While every negative story about the character of the PM is assumed to be true as he is not someone they can recognise. Every relaunch is destroyed by the media, within a few hours. While every tory policy is respected and given a fair hearing. It was never really the case that the media gave the PM a honeymoon period. In reality he had two good weeks when the Tory leader did not toe the tory line on snobby grammar schools and when the PM had a good party conference. As soon as the Labour party did go 10 points in the lead after his party conference the media went in overdrive and have not let up from utter hatred. They cannot stand the idea of a state educated non Oxbridge PM.
I am not a bigot to those who go to private school or Oxbridge, but for all this talk of inverted snobbery is the real problem still simple snobbery.
Tory snobs stop your snobbery to the PM. Just because he did not go to private school or Oxbridge that is no justification to hate him. Just as it is not justification to hate someone if they did go to Oxbridge or private school.

PM supports Josie Russell's 'Malaria No More' campaign

2008-07-09T22:47:00.001+01:00

PM supports Josie Russell's 'Malaria No More' campaign
:
Surely this is a good cause for people to see.

If Labour change leader before next election we should elect a left winger not a right winger

2008-07-09T22:28:00.003+01:00

I support the present leader of the Labour party because I am loyal. Plus I still feel we can win the next election with him. But if we do change before the next election. We should make sure a real left wing leader is elected. What is the point in wasting the remaining time in government on a right winger if that is what got us into the position of replacing another leader in the first place.
The mainstream media are presenting right wing candidates, lets go for a moderate left winger. Not someone who scares the horses but a moderate left winger with high intellect.
I say start campaigning for left wingers now. Do not wait until it is too late, when their will be too much right wing pressure on who should be the new leader.
I am NOT calling for destabilisation or for people to campaign for the present leader to be removed just, that people will be ready to put forward a real left wing candidate if we do change the leader.

My policies I would support would be;

1. Increase income taxes for those earning over 80,000 a year a new higher rate of income tax added with higher rate.
2. Cut taxes on the poor : This will ensure real financial redistribution.
3. Scrap Nuclear energy and use Wind turbines and other renewable energy alternatives.

If we do have to change the leader of the party again we should not have right wing leader hoisted on us. It should be left wing leader. So I will start putting forward real alternatives rather than the other candidates. I am sure if we do no prepare we would probably have a far more right wing candidate hoisted on us than we do at present.

My priority is higher income taxes and scraping nuclear energy for better more efficient renewable energy.

Labour brings 3000 jobs to Glasgow in stroke of a pen.

2008-07-05T14:53:00.000+01:00

Labour brings 3000 jobs to Glasgow with the building of new aircraft carriers in Glasgow.
This story highlights a line labour should take in the by election. The labour government has brought 3000 jobs to Glasgow with it's plans to build the new aircraft carriers in the the UK. This gives real industrial long term skilled jobs to the country. Jobs that give people a real income and pride. In the same story it has been quoted that the contract will also bring 1600 jobs to Rosyth, 400 to Barrow in Furness in north west England and an incredible 1200 to the Southern English city of Portsmouth (a famous navy city). This will help the economy of industrial areas of the UK, reinvesting in the people, and giving people pride. Could any other party have done this? Nope. I think the Tories would not want to reinvest in the industrial areas of the UK. I ask tories what is it you don't like about 11 years of economic growth and giving real skilled jobs to real people? ::
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7486683.stm

Boycott the tory blogs Now!

2008-07-05T14:12:00.000+01:00

Boycott the Tory blogs Now

JOIN MY BOYCOTT THE TORY BLOGS CAMPAIGN. NOW!
KEEP YOURSELF EDUCATED ON THE FACTS NOT ON TORY LIES.

BY READING TORY BLOGS YOU;

1. HELP THE TORIES DETERMINE THE NEWS AGENDA.
You will be like fish to the Tory bait. Whether you like it or not, you will take in their news agenda as the news agenda to follow. Even if you are defending labour you are simply helping their news agenda be THE news agenda.

2. YOU WILL BE BANNED IF YOU ARE TOO CLEVER FOR THEM.
So what is the point in playing the game by their rules. Play it on the labour blogs play on labour's home pitch not on the Tory pitch. Would you play a game if every time you won the referee banned you.

3. YOU WILL GIVE ADVERTISING REVENUE TO THE TORIES BY VISITING THEIR BLOG.

4. ADDING COMMENTS TO THEIR BLOGS ENCOURAGES THE IDEA THAT THEIR BLOGS ARE WHERE THE DEBATE IS.
If you have an argument with a Tory in the Tory blogs you may think you are defending the party, but in reality you are simply encouraging the media and other bloggers to think this is where the debate is. This encourages more people to visit their blogs. In fact the more comments you add on their blogs the more you aid them, you will aid them and their agenda.

Why is it the Tory blogs dominate the blogosphere? Simple because left wing bloggers visit the Tory websites. Do not read them they warp you. Many tory blogs are run by offensive Nazis, and people who think we should bring back the slave trade. You simply give them publicity. I am certain they already boycott left wing blogs whether deliberately or just by default.

DO NOT VISIT TORY BLOGS
THE ALTERNATIVES TO VISTING TORY BLOGS
THERE ARE PLENTY OF LEFT WING ALTERNATIVES OF WELL RUN LEFT BLOGS THAT PUBLISH DAILY POSTS.
LEFT WING NEWSPAPERS PUBLISH OPINION SURVEYS FOR YOU TO KEEP UP TO DATE ON THE NEWS AND POLITICAL STORIES. I still fell you can read tory newspapers but it is the tory blogs you can easily do without. Why do you need to read them they offer you nothing that the major left wing blogs do not? In fact the left wing is full of critical and complimentary blogs of the government, but in the end their agenda is the left. If you read a right wing blog you are following "their" agenda.
Of course we need a few chosen left wingers to read the right wing blogs to ensure they are educated on the Tory strategy and on the lies the right wing bloggers spread, but it has reached the point where many left wingers follow the Tory line to an OTT extent quoting daily their response to some Torys' blog.

This protest includes the Tory blogs that pretend not be Tory but claim to be a supporter of some right wing group that just happen to be linked to the Tory party. Many major (secret) Tory bloggers claim to be of some small right wing party, but when you look up their bios on wikipedia you find they have massive connections to the Tory party. It is a typical right wing trick to have people who put forward the tory agenda while claiming to be of some right wing independent political group.

I used to be addicted to using Tory blogs, it was for me the place to debate to go up to the enemy and argue with them. But I have now realised I was helping them. I was enabling them to be centre of debate. I added to their users and worst of all I took in their news agenda as the news agenda to follow.
The Labour HQ must advise labour members not to read tory blogs. You are simply reading tory propaganda day after, day after, day. Surely you can see this does not help you. This is not censorship, or a joke. I am serious the more you read tory blogs the more you help them.
I realise some labour supporters will claim this is an OTT reaction. But I ask you how the heck do Tories dominate the blogosphere to such an extreme? Simple because you let them. You read them, you comment on them you advertise them. You are their vital marketer. You are tory trojan horse who stupidly does viral marketing them for them. Grow up, ignore them. You must link to labour blogs, read labour blogs or at worst read lib dems blogs who atleast have left wing views.

Scottish Labour Party - Justice

2008-06-30T17:56:00.000+01:00

Scottish Labour Party - Justice
Building up communities
Reform justice to be on the side of people who suffer most from crime.

Scottish labour has done alot to combat sectarianism.
It was labour that brought in devolution.

William Wilberforce was not a conservative / Tory MP

2008-06-29T00:58:00.000+01:00

William Wilberforce was not a conservative MP. I was amazed to find out recently that the cheep Tory propaganda claim that Wilberforce was a Tory is in fact a lie. And in fact the his famous 1807 act of parliament was carried out during a short lasting Whig party government. As was the 1833 total abolition. So why do tories claim the credit?

The Slave Trade Act was an Act of Parliament of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on 25 March 1807, with the long title "An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade". The original act is in the Parliamentary Archives. The act abolished the slave trade in the British Empire, but not slavery itself; that had to wait for the Slavery Abolition Act 1833.

Wilberforce was elected Member of Parliament (MP) for Kingston upon Hull, spending over £8,000 to ensure he received the necessary votes, as was the custom of the time. Wilberforce sat as an independent, resolving to be "no party man". Criticised at times for inconsistency, he supported both Tory and Whig governments, working closely with the party in power, and voting on specific measures according to their merits.

William Wyndham Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville PC (October 25, 1759 – January 12, 1834), was a British Whig statesman and Prime Minister. Following William Pitt's death in 1806, Grenville became the head of the "Ministry of All the Talents", a coalition between Grenville's supporters, the Foxite Whigs, and the supporters of former Prime Minister Lord Sidmouth, with Grenville as First Lord of the Treasury and Fox as Foreign Secretary as joint leaders. Grenville's cousin William Windham served as Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, and his younger brother, Thomas Grenville, served briefly as First Lord of the Admiralty. The Ministry ultimately accomplished little, failing either to make peace with France or to accomplish Catholic emancipation (the later attempt resulting in the ministry's dismissal in March, 1807). It did have one significant achievement, however, the abolition of the slave trade in 1807.

The Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 was an 1833 Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom abolishing slavery throughout the majority of the British Empire (with the notable exceptions "of the Territories in the Possession of the East India Company," the "Island of Ceylon," and "the Island of Saint Helena.")
Once again this happened under a whig party government of Charles Grey, 2nd Earl Grey. In 1830, the Whigs finally returned to power, with Grey as Prime Minister. His Ministry was a notable one, seeing passage of the Reform Act 1832, which finally saw the reform of the House of Commons, and the abolition of slavery throughout the British Empire in 1833. As the years had passed, however, Grey had become more conservative, and he was cautious about initiating more far-reaching reforms. In 1834 Grey retired from public life, leaving Lord Melbourne as his successor.

The Tories did nothing to stop slavery. Yet in their mendacity claim they did. Even holding celebratory parties claiming his act as theirs. Well when did the Tories become the Whig party.:

The PM and Ban Ki-moon, Press Conference

2008-06-18T17:49:00.001+01:00

The PM and Ban Ki-moon, Press Conference
::
Why does he want to bank on the moon.:::

Super Rock star Jonathan Freedland says PM is not cool enough to be PM

2008-06-18T17:04:00.000+01:00

Yes apparently according to Jonathan Freedland the 10 times in row world sexiest man and top rock star who also sidelines as a journalist the PM is not "21st century" enough to be PM. Yeah baby. Maybe he should take advice on how how to be a super rock star leader from Jonathan Freedland LOL.
The most charismatic man in the whole planet. Woooooooooohphhhhee.

I am only joking I normally like Jonathan Freedland's articles as he is republican but I disagree with this article which seems to argue FOR MORE superficial judgements on how we choose a leader.
In my view the moronic pop idol style of choosing politicians based on looks and charisma is what we need to move away from. Surely intelligence and mental strength are far more important qualities.
How is it 21st century to choose a leader by looks and charisma, it is more "21st century BC", as basic as choosing a leader by who is the tallest or strongest. It is like that of a primitive tribe of monkeys, not a modern educated democracy.
Hitler one of the most charismatic politicians of the previous century said "What good fortune for governments that the people do not think." and "The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force." Let us show Hitler was wrong.

I mean how would Freedland feel if someone said he was not Good looking enough or charismatic enough to be a journalist. What if only Hugh Grant and Peter Andre were allowed to be journalists.

Politics is supposed to be show business for ugly people. Well I feel sorry for the ugly people who now have no place to go. Who wants to be lead by a bunch of moronic
bimbos.:

Tory trolls bully on Guardian comment is free to hate labour

2008-06-18T12:55:00.000+01:00

Tory trolls have infested the Guardian comment is free board. And done even worse on the Guardian political blogs. I am fed up with these tory trolls. They even list the identities I used, with identities even I have forgotten. It is very odd. It makes me think either the Tory trolls have a big database of identities I used, which is odd, or even worse but unlikely the moderators on some section of the Guardian blogs, are the tory trolls. One of my ID's got banned from guardian politics blogs but not from comment is free.
Maybe some tories at tory HQ run a internet troll campaign and have a list of ID's I use. I cannot think of any other explanation. I mean this as soon as I start using the guardian comment is free boards with a new ID they trace me within a few minutes. But not just that, listing my previous Ids. How? I do not remember most of those IDs' let alone the internet IDs of people I met on the internet. And they respond within minutes. I would not be surprised, if that is so it is pretty pathetic. The other explanation is a pile of tory trolls work as moderators at guardian blogs. I would find that surprising as at first I was allowed to insult the tory trolls back and the tory trolls used to complain and ask my posts to be removed.
The tory trolls also like to boast on the political blogs "oh look now one on this left wing newspaper posts pro labour comments". Well no wonder if you get an organised attack on you that leads to you being banned if you do repsonmd in anger. It is just bullies winning as usual.
I always used to get accused of being a labour paid hack. Which is odd considering no one would ever pay me to be a hack, due to my poor spelling and poor communication skills. I run my blog off my own back. I support labour for free. I doubt labour HQ are that pleased, or bothered at me supporting labour. So my view is when Tory trolls claim I am paid by labour to support labour, it is the projection theory maybe these Tory trolls are paid by the Tories and then project that claim onto anyone who disagrees with them.

Is the EU a NAZI European Union? No way as Hitler would have hated the EU.

2008-06-16T11:33:00.000+01:00

The European union is not a NAZI invention in any way. It is a common ploy by the euro skeptics to claim the NAZIs were the first to support a United Europe and sharing of sovereignty. In reality there was no consistent support for a United Europe from the Nazis, or Hitler's main policies. Hitler supported a union of all the Germanic people, (Greater Germany) and to expand “Lebensraum”, living space in the east (Ukraine and the Soviet Union), for the German people to live. He had no desire to unite Europe with an alliance of equal nations as he saw Germany as being the dominant power not a equal state in a large equal European union. He would not have accepted Austria, Holland and Czech republic as independent voices outside of Germany. He supported Greater Germany. Not a equal European Union.

Points raised in my article.
1. Hitler withdrew from the league of nations showing his hatred of multinational cooperation. The League had accepted Germany as a member in 1926, deeming it a "peace-loving country", but Adolf Hitler pulled Germany out when he came to power in 1933. Hungary's NAZI sympathizing government under Gyula Gömbös supported Hungary leaving the league of nations.

2. In Mein Kampf you can see Hitler had no vision of European alliance of equal nations.
He states in one section of Mein Kampf:
"If in the past our ancestors had based their political decisions on similar pacifist nonsense as our present generation does, we should not possess more than one-third of the national territory that we possess to-day and probably there would be no German nation to worry about its future in Europe."
So from this you can see he fears other European nations, and does not support cooperation between nations.
From reading Mein Kampf you can see he is obsessed by Germany's power and talks of the long term strategic geopolitical power of Germany, and it's borders. He seeks an alliance with what he calls "England" to ensure Germany is given living space in Russia. And he criticicises German leaders who broke with "England".
In Mein Kampf he states
"The whole system of alliances should have been envisaged and valued from that standpoint. If new territory were to be acquired in Europe it must have been mainly at Russia's cost, and once again the new German Empire should have set out on its march along the same road as was formerly trodden by the Teutonic Knights, this time to acquire soil for the German plough by means of the German sword and thus provide the nation with its daily bread." He then states. "For such a policy, however, there was only one possible ally in Europe. That was England."
I see no evidence in Mein Kampf that he supported an equal alliance of European nations in peace.

He says in Mein Kampf
"Now it is unfortunately true that only too often the best nations - or, to speak more exactly, the only really cultured nations, who at the same time are the chief bearers of human progress - have decided, in their blind pacifism, to refrain from the acquisition of new territory and to be content with 'internal colonization.'" This ties in with the theory that he saw some nations as inferior. Which would not be compatible with the EU or the UN or the league of nations that he removed his nation from.

3. Perhaps most damningally for all Euroskeptics is the typical Euro skeptic claim that the EU is French German alliance. Well I quote in Mein Kampf "Finally, we must be quite clear on the following point: France is and will remain the implacable enemy of Germany. It does not matter what Governments have ruled or will rule in France". So the EU is an enemy of Hitler's geopolitical claims, that France is an enemy of Germany.

4. Hitler did not unite all then the nations he conquered under one national government. He kept single currencies, and unelected pro NAZI leaders ruling many of the states he conquered and explicitly did not anex them into Greater Germany.
In Mein Kampf Hitler states
"Only children could believe that sweet and unctuous expressions of goodness and persistent avowals of peaceful intentions could get them their bananas through this 'friendly competition between the nations', with the prospect of never having to fight for them.". Once again these lines to me indicate a contempt for the values of our European Union.
I also think these lines from Hitler's Mein Kampf show contempt for the values of the EU "The chatter about the peaceful conquest of the world by commercial means was probably the most completely nonsensical stuff ever raised to the dignity of a guiding principle in the policy of a State".

2. Hitler united Greater Germany but seemed to "respect" the independence of some other nations, except when it got in the way of shirt term Germany military actions. This was because he wanted to unite Greater Germany.
Großdeutschland (German for "Greater Germany" or "Large Germany") is a term referring to the concept of one German nation state with adequate "living space" (Lebensraum) for all of the Germanic peoples. In the 19th century, Greater Germany (Großdeutschland) was the idea of a unified Germany including Austria, as opposed to the Prussian-promoted alternative of Lesser Germany (Kleindeutschland), which excluded Austria. With the foundation of the German Empire in 1871, which did not include Austria, the Kleindeutschland solution was put into practice. Others proposed a unified Germany including all lands of the Austrian Empire. Großdeutschland became a reality after the Anschluss with Austria by Nazi Germany in 1938. During the war, Nazi Germany directly annexed Alsace-Lorraine and Eupen-Malmedy which were lost in 1919 but also took over Luxembourg, the Sudetenland portions of the present-day Czech Republic, and large parts of Poland. The areas annexed by German were considered part of a Greater German state, in contrast to parts of Poland under the General Government and the Protectorate of Bohemia-Moravia, both of which were German controlled, but not part of Greater Germany. This came to an end with the Surrender of Germany to the Allies in 1945.
Another aim of the German occupiers was to dissolve the Dutch nation and make it part of a greater Germanic, or Aryan, one. The German officials, including those of the SS, Arthur Seyss-Inquart, and Adolf Hitler himself regarded the Dutch as part of the Aryan Herrenvolk.

5. Here is how Hitler treated some of the nations.
Luxembourg
The Nazis considered the Luxembourgers as just another Germanic ethnic group and the Grand Duchy a German territory. That is why the country was never formally annexed.
Following the refusal of the Dutch government to return, the Netherlands was controlled by a German civilian governor—unlike France, Denmark and Norway, which had their own governments, or Belgium, which was placed under direct German military control.
Hitler supported Italy and Spain being strong independent nations but run by fascist leaders.
Sweden
The policy of Sweden during World War II was to remain neutral. Swedish neutrality had been the policy for more than a century, since the end of the Napoleonic Wars. Germany did no prevent this.
Romania
In June 1941, after a brief period of nominal neutrality under King Carol, Romania joined the Axis Powers. Romania became a member of the Axis under the government of Ion Antonescu. In August 1944, a coup led by King Michael deposed Antonescu dictatorship and put Romania on the side of the Allies for the remainder of the war.
Ion Victor Antonescu (June 15, 1882, Pites,ti – June 1, 1946, near Jilava) was the prime minister and conduca(tor (Leader) of Romania during World War II from September 4, 1940 to August 23, 1944.
Denmark
Contrary to the situation in other countries under German occupation, most Danish institutions continued to function relatively normally until 1943. Both the Danish government and King remained in the country in an uneasy relationship between a democratic and a totalitarian system until German authorities dissolved the government following a wave of strikes and sabotage.
Albania
Germany occupied Albania in September 1943, dropping paratroopers into Tirana before the Albanian guerrillas could take the capital, and the German army soon drove the guerrillas into the hills and to the south. Berlin subsequently announced it would recognize the independence of a neutral Albania and organized an Albanian government, police, and military.
The Slovak Republic (Slovak: Slovenská republika) was an independent national Slovak state which existed from 14 March 1939 to 8 May 1945 as an ally and client state of Nazi Germany. It existed on roughly the same territory as present-day Slovakia (with the exception of the southern and eastern parts of present-day Slovakia). The Republic bordered Germany, the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, General Government (enemy-occupied remnant of Poland), and Hungary.
Bulgaria
Under Filov's government Bulgaria drifted into World War II, faced by an Invasion and bribed by the return of southern Dobruja from Romania, on the orders of Hitler (see Vienna Award), in September 1940. In March 1941 Bulgaria formally signed the Tripartite Pact, becoming a German ally, and German troops entered the country in preparation for the German invasion of Greece and Yugoslavia. When Yugoslavia and Greece were defeated, Bulgaria was allowed to occupy all of Greek Thrace and most of Macedonia. Bulgaria declared war on Britain and the United States, but resisted German pressure to declare war on the Soviet Union, fearful of pro-Russian sentiment in the country.
In August 1943 Tsar Boris died suddenly after returning from Germany (possibly assassinated, although this has never been proved) and was succeeded by his six-year old son Simeon II. Power was held by a council of regents headed by the young Tsar's uncle, Prince Kirill. The new Prime Minister, Dobri Bozhilov, was in most respects a German puppet.
Resistance to the Germans and the Bulgarian regime was widespread by 1943, coordinated mainly by the Communists. Together with the Agrarians, now led by Nikola Petkov, the Social Democrats and even with many army officers they founded the Fatherland Front. Partisans operated in the mountainous west and south. By 1944 it was obvious that Germany was losing the war and the regime began to look for a way out. Bozhilov resigned in May, and his successor Ivan Ivanov Bagrianov tried to arrange negotiations with the western Allies.
The Kingdom of Bulgaria (Bulgarian: ??????? ????????) was established on October 5, 1908 (September 22 O.S.) when the Principality of Bulgaria officially[1] proclaimed itself independent from the Ottoman Empire and was elevated to the style of kingdom. This move also formalised the annexation of the Ottoman province of Eastern Rumelia, which had been under Bulgarian control since 1885. In 1946 the monarchy was abolished, its final Tsar was sent into exile and the kingdom was replaced by a People's Republic.
France
It is a common misconception that the Vichy regime administered only the unoccupied zone of southern France (named "free zone" (zone libre) by Vichy), while the Germans directly administered the occupied zone. In fact, the civil jurisdiction of the Vichy government extended over the whole of metropolitan France, except for Alsace-Lorraine, a disputed territory which was placed under German administration (though not formally annexed). French civil servants in Bordeaux, such as Maurice Papon, or Nantes were under the authority of French ministers in Vichy. René Bousquet, head of French police nominated by Vichy, exercised his power directly in Paris through his second, Jean Leguay, who coordinated raids with the Nazis.
Hungary
The Great Depression induced a drop in the standard of living and the political mood of the country shifted further toward the right. In 1932, Regent Miklós Horthy appointed a new prime-minister, Gyula Gömbös, that changed the course of Hungarian policy towards closer cooperation with Germany and started an effort to assimilate the small minority population in Hungary, which totalled 5-7% of the population. Gömbös signed a trade agreement with Germany that led to the fast expansion of the economy, drawing Hungary out of the Great Depression, but made Hungary dependent on the German economy for both raw materials and markets. Gömbös advocated a number of social reforms, a one-party government, a revision of the Treaty of Trianon, and Hungary's withdrawal from the League of Nations.
The Slovak Republic was recognized by Nazi Germany and states friendly (or neutral) towards Germany. The states recognizing the Slovak Republic included Great Britain, Italy, Japan, and its puppet states (Manchukuo, Mengjiang, and the Provisional Government of China), the Soviet Union, Spain, Croatia, Lithuania, Estonia, Switzerland, El Salvador, the Vatican and Hungary. But the first Slovak Republic's legal existence was retroactively nullified by World War II victorious parties as a result of the nullification of the Munich Agreement and all its consequences.
Germany
Finland
During the Continuation War (1941-1944) Finland was co-belligerent with Nazi Germany, and dependent on food, fuel and armament shipments from Germany. The country did, however, retain a democratic form of government. During the war Germany and Finland were united by a common enemy, the Soviet Union, yet Finland kept her army outside the German command structure despite numerous attempts to tie them more tightly together.
Finnish Jews were not persecuted, and even among extremists of the Finnish Right they were highly tolerated, as many leaders of the movement came from the clergy. Of approximately five hundred Jewish refugees, eight were handed over to the Germans, a fact for which Finnish prime minister Paavo Lipponen issued an official apology in 2000. The field synagogue operated by the Finnish army was probably a unique phenomenon in Europe.

6. Many of the "NAZI's" the Euro skeptics put forward to suggest their was NAZI support for the EU turn out be simply academics employed in German universities at the time, and seem to not be in reality Nazis But simply classified as Nazis by euroskeptics as they lived and worked in Germany at the time of NAZI government. This logic would mean that every Soviet union academic during the Stalin era was a Stalinist.
7. Hitler supported the British Empire as he said in Zweites Buch. Where he hoped for alliance of Greater Germany and the British Empire against the USA.
8. Hitler maintained national divisions in Europe despite having the ability to enforce any extreme elements of his ideology. So there is no hint of a desire for single currency or European president.
9. Hitler regarded many European people as inferior races such as the European Jews, the non Aryans, Gypsies. So he did not accept the concept of a united Europe of equal nations.
10. In Mein Kampf Hitler predicts the stages of Germany's political emergence on the world scene: in the first stage, Germany would, through a program of massive rearmament, overthrow the shackles of the Treaty of Versailles and form alliances with the British Empire and Fascist Italy (No European Union). The second stage would feature wars against France and her allies in Eastern Europe by the combined forces of Germany, Britain and Italy (No European nation). The third and final stage would be a war to destroy what Hitler saw as the "Judeo-Bolshevik" regime in the Soviet Union that would give Germany the necessary Lebensraum. German historian Andreas Hillgruber labeled the plans contained in Mein Kampf as Hitler's "Stufenplan" ("stage-by-stage plan"). The term "Stufenplan" has been widely used by historians, though it must be noted that the term was Hillgruber's, not Hitler's.
So there is no evidence of Htiler wanting actual European government. He wanted Germany to be the superpower with Britain, another superpower, and other fascist states.
11. Some Nazis did support European integration, but few of these were the major players in NAZI government. And Hitler never seemed to support European integration in any way. He just supported a Greater Germany, with Germany in the position the USA is today.
12. Churchill and Eisenhower both supported European integration
13. None of the 25 point program of the Nazis ideology in the twenties pointed to national cooperation Infact these points expressly asked for "All non-German immigration must be prevented", "Non-citizens may live in Germany only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens.", "that no non-German newspapers may appear without the express permission of the State. They must not be printed in the German language;", "We demand the union of all Germany in a Greater Germany on the basis of the right of national self-determination."

14. In Mein Kampf Hitler agrees with the commonly stated idea that "England" deliberately seeks to keep Europe weak so that it can keep it's back door safe while it colonies the planet.
"Thus the political results of the war to prevent the development of German power was the creation of a French hegemony on the Continent. The military result was the consolidation of France as the first Continental Power and the recognition of American equality on the sea. The economic result was the cession of great spheres of British interests to her former allies and associates.

The Balkanization of Europe, up to a certain degree, was desirable and indeed necessary in the light of the traditional policy of Great Britain, just as France desired the Balkanization of Germany.

What England has always desired, and will continue to desire, is to prevent any one Continental Power in Europe from attaining a position of world importance. Therefore England wishes to maintain a definite equilibrium of forces among the European States - for this equilibrium seems a necessary condition of England's world-hegemony."

15. The EU was not in any way founded by NAZIs. In fact the initiator of the EUropean Union Robert Schuman was nearly executed by the NAZIs.
The ECSC, the forerunner of the European Union was first proposed by French foreign minister Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950 as a way to prevent further war between France and Germany. It was formally established in 1951 by the Treaty of Paris, signed not only by France and Germany, but also by Italy and the three Benelux states: Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.
Schuman was born on (June 29, 1886 – September 4, 1963) was a noted Luxembourg-born French politician, a Christian Democrat (M.R.P.) who is regarded as one of the founders of the European Union. After the death of his mother in a coach accident, Schuman may have briefly considered the religious life, but resolved to pursue a lay apostolate. He remained single and celibate throughout his life. He became a lawyer, and was judged medically unfit for military call-up. (He served in a civilian capacity during the First World War, so never wore a German uniform). He was a member of the city council of Metz as well as the German Katholikentag. After the First World War, Alsace-Lorraine was retaken by France and Schuman became active in French politics. In 1919 he was first elected as député to parliament on a regional list, and later serving as the député for Thionville until 1958 with an interval during the war years. He made a major contribution to the drafting and parliamentary passage of the Lex Schuman by the French parliament. Schuman also investigated and patiently uncovered postwar corruption in the Lorraine steel industries.
In 1940, because of his expertise on Germany, Schuman was called to become a member of Paul Reynaud's wartime government. Later that year, he was arrested for acts of resistance and protest against Nazi methods. He was interrogated by the Gestapo. Thanks to an honourable German, he was saved from being sent to Dachau. Transferred as a personal prisoner of the vicious Nazi Gauleiter Joseph Buerckel, he escaped in 1942 and joined the French Resistance. Although his life was still at risk, he spoke to friends about a Franco-German and European reconciliation that must take place after the end of hostilities, as he had already done in 1939-40.

15. The first people to talk of European economic communities were not the small number of NAZIs who disscussed it, but many many European through out the centuries.
As well as Churchill and Eisenhower.
Albert Camus. Algerian-born French author, philosopher, and journalist who won the Nobel prize in 1957. In 1944 Camus founded the “French Committee for the European Federation" (Comité Français pour la Féderation Européene -CFFE) declaring that Europe “can only evolve along the path of economic progress, democracy and peace if the nation states become a federation”.
In 22-25 March, 1945, the first conference of the European Federalist Movement was organised in Paris with the participation of Albert Camus, George Orwell, Emmanuel Mounier, Lewis Mumford, André Philip, Daniel Mayer, François Bondy and Altiero Spinelli (see the book “The Biography of Europe” by Pan Drakopoulos). This specific branch of the European Federalist Movement disintegrated in 1957 after the domination of Winston Churchill's ideas about the European integration. So even George Orwell supported this European Union idea. I am going to have alot of fun telling the NWO fans this.

16. The Roman Empire, Napolean, the Holly Roman Empire, Attila the Hun all took over large areas of Europe by millitary conquest or strategic alliances. So why do people say Hitler was first to unite Europe when he did not do that under any basis. Spain, Portugal, and non German Axis nations were not part of Germany. The UK was not under his control. So even if Hitler did conquer large parts of Europe. Other dictators and tyrants, or nations did before him. Stalin conquered much of Europe too after him. As did the . Plus Hitler invaded Africa so what does that have to do with the European Union. The Ottoman Empire conquered much of South Eastern Europe. The Mongols tried to conquer all of Europe. The Vikings took over much of Nothern Europe. Plus the Muslims conquered much of Spain. So where do people get off claiming Hitler was the first guy to try and conquer Europe. He did not, and was not the first to try. He was not even the first European to try.

17. This I hope should kill off the NWO drivel.
Hitler also talks of a Jewish world-dictatorship in Mein Kampf, Which compares to the NWO fanatics who claim Jews run the planet. In Mein Kampf, Hitler states "Should one State preserve its national strength and its national greatness the empire of the Jewish satrapy, like every other tyranny, would have to succumb to the force of the national idea.".
So there you go final Hitler arguing that that the national idea must continue in the face of what today right wingers might call the NWO.:

The Carpenters - Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft

2008-06-16T10:49:00.000+01:00

The Carpenters - Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft

Lib dem and BNP candidates must stand in Haltemprice and Howden

2008-06-16T09:49:00.000+01:00

Apparently the Tory MP is saying it would be a gutless act of the labourgovernment not to field a candidate in his seat.
Plus that the labour party was treating his constituents with "contempt". Well if that is the case why did he ask the Lib Dem candidate to stand down. You cannot pick and choose you opponents. This is not a fixed dodgy heavy weight boxing championship match run by the Mafia.
You cannot on the one hand have the BNP and Libs dems candidates refusing to stand as they support your rejection of 42 day "tough on terror" detention and then force another party to stand.
The labour party have a right to claim this is a stunt.
You have no right to force anyone to stand it is free country. I thought that is what you Tories said you were standing for.
Stalin showed the left can be tough on national security and terror. I do not support the mass murders of Stalin. But the fact is the left are often tougher on national security than the right wing. As we see on this issue.
Anyway if labour do not stand a candidate it will be OK for rebel labour MPs to campaign with you as you will not technically be a rival candidate as you will not be standing against labour. So surely that should make you happier.
Here a link to the story. :
http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iyqJXbFdJsJKqF8tuWh3GU71Volw

Lisbon treaty Irish vote was fixed by the devil end of story.

2008-06-13T21:55:00.000+01:00

Unlucky : Friday the 13th Ireland votes for the devil.
As I wrote on the article I linked too, It is odd that on the day of the devil Friday the 13th Irish vote count should suddenly switch from yes in almost all opinion polls, bookmakers to a sudden big no vote.
Lisbon treaty Irish vote friday the 13th fixed by the devil!

I know the vote was on the 12th but the count was only on the 13th. Which is when Satan would find it best to fix the vote.
Warning there was no exit poll for the referendum.
Why? Why in the name of Ireland would there be no exit poll. It is hardly too costly. An exit poll is vital for democracy, to ensure there is no fix. So surely this vote was ripe for a fix. There are state wide exit polls in US presidential elections.
There is a big chance of neocon Americans who have a big record of fixing votes, or from Islamic NAZIs or Chinese commies who want Europe to weak too.
There is no doubt the neocons want Europe to be weak. Yes the neocons often support NAFTA as they want the USA to be strong but I assure you the neocon Yankees want Europe to be weak, they do not want a strong Europe.
I have made a jokey video did the devil fix the vote?
But I honestly am worried that USA neocons did fix the vote. They wrecked the USA I am sure they would have qualms on wrecking the EU, for their moronic idiotic short term strategic benefit for the USA. The USA may benefit in the short term from a weak Europe but now when China becomes a superpower, it is the last thing they need. I assure you. By the way they are so filled with hatred for Europe's failure to support their invasions of Iran and Iraq, they have an irrational desire to destroy us.

Unlucky : Friday the 13th Ireland votes for the devil.

2008-06-13T20:18:00.000+01:00

It is surely no surprise that a catholic nation like Ireland would vote for the devil on Friday the 13th. The pope should have clearly warned them that the devil would try and fiddle with the vote. I notice there was no exit poll.
Did anyone notice a two horned red faced man with a big fork counting the votes. I did. Evil ####. Mnay of the vote papers has burn marks on them like they had been counted in very hot place.
Ireland has voted for NAZI bigotry, nationalism, narrow minded, cowardly, vindictive bullying policy of the NO campaign on the Lisbon treaty.
Yes evil has won today. Satan certainly got a march on Europe today. In out battle for good and justice the devil has used this day to increase his power.
The Islamic NAZIs, the Chinese commies and the NAZI neocons will be delighted by the no vote their craven satanic desire to divide up Europe and leave ripe for plunder.
The enemies of Europe are delighted. The centre of civilization for 1000 years has been dealt an evil blow. British traitors to Europe who creepily hate their own continent, and dumb NAZI morons, who do not realise what will happen to them once we are conquered, have had a great day today.
The Irish have cheered up the Satanic British imperialists who detest the freedom and democracy of the EU.
Plus Gerry Adams the man who supported the evil murderers in the IRA is especially happy today. Sinfull Fein are delighted.
His Eyes - Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning
This is the real face of the evil euroskeptics
:
Friday the 13th Part III theme
:

It is no wonder Nepal do not want a king

2008-06-13T15:30:00.000+01:00

The Nepalese royal massacre occurred on Friday, June 1, 2001, at the Narayanhity Royal Palace, the former residence of the Nepalese monarchy, when Crown Prince Dipendra shot members of his family. As a result of the shooting, ten people died and five were wounded. The dead included King Birendra of Nepal :
Documentary On Royal Massacre of Nepal-Part I

Documentary On Royal Massacre of Nepal-Part II

Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part - III

Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part - IV

Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part -V

Obama Girl Explains Twister

2008-06-13T15:19:00.000+01:00

Obama Girl Explains Twister

McCain Hulk outtakes!

2008-06-13T15:14:00.000+01:00

McCain Hulk outtakes!:

Cromwell and the Rise of Parliamentary Democracy (clip)

2008-06-13T15:02:00.000+01:00

Cromwell and the Rise of Parliamentary Democracy (clip):
Cromwell: Remix
:

WINSTON CHURCHILL QUOTES "Heroes do not fight like greeks"

2008-06-13T14:58:00.000+01:00

WINSTON CHURCHILL QUOTES "Heroes do not fight like greeks":

dangerdanger82 is a pillock

2008-06-13T14:52:00.000+01:00

dangerdanger82 is a pillock I am fed up with his annoying support of right wing nationalism and evil bigotry. He supports the destruction of Europe. He is a #### in my view:.::

Stalin was tough on terror. The left can be tough on terror

2008-06-13T14:44:00.000+01:00

Look at Stalin kicking Hitler back to Berlin.
Since when were the left wing soft on national security.
The labour party is now strong on national security than the BNP, the UKIP, the Sinful fein and the Tories.
As the BNP, the UKIP, Sinful Fein and the Tories are all against 42 day terror detention.
Why?
Because the left care about the people. The right only care about materialistic issues.
I hope the house of lords back the people.

Alex Jones - Rape & Torture Memos

2008-06-13T14:40:00.000+01:00

Remember Irish no votes you have helped the evil neocons win and they will wreck Europe apart. They hate Europe.