tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-65968214725494268012009-02-20T21:54:43.552-08:00Climate ChangeA site by the Students on Climate Change dedicated to bring forth to the public the robust findings and research done by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in their 4th assessment report on Climate Change and from other organizations. All information and graphs are currently from the Working Group I's 1,000+ page report. The reports from Working Group II and III will be posted at a later date.Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-48721711023737458752007-11-09T16:03:00.000-08:002007-11-09T16:09:16.009-08:00How Reliable Are the Models Used to Make Projections of Future Climate Change?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzT2peTA4qI/AAAAAAAAACs/A4gDDBRF8LM/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzT2peTA4qI/AAAAAAAAACs/A4gDDBRF8LM/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5130997067849720482" border="0" /></a><br /> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >There is considerable confidence that climate models provide credible quantitative estimates of future climate change, particularly at continental scales and above. This confidence comes from the foundation of the models in accepted physical principles and from their ability to reproduce observed features of current climate and past climate changes. Confidence in model estimates is higher for some climate variables (e.g., temperature) than for others (e.g., precipitation). Over several decades of development, models have consistently provided a robust and unambiguous picture of significant climate warming in response to increasing greenhouse gases. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Climate models are mathematical representations of the climate system, expressed as computer codes and run on powerful computers. One source of confidence in models comes from the fact that model fundamentals are based on established physical laws, such as conservation of mass, energy and momentum, along with a wealth of observations. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >A second source of confidence comes from the ability of models to simulate important aspects of the current climate. Models are routinely and extensively assessed by comparing their simulations with observations of the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere and land surface. Unprecedented levels of evaluation have taken place over the last decade in the form of organized multi-model ‘intercomparisons’. Models show significant and increasing skill in representing many important mean climate features, such as the large-scale distributions of atmospheric temperature, precipitation, radiation and wind, and of oceanic temperatures, currents and sea ice cover. Models can also simulate aspects of many of the patterns of climate variability observed across a range of time scales. Some climate models, or closely related variants, have also been tested by using them to predict weather and make seasonal forecasts. These models demonstrate skill in such forecasts, showing they can represent important features of the general circulation across shorter time scales, as well as aspects of seasonal and interannual variability. Models’ ability to represent these and other important climate features increases our confidence that they represent the essential physical processes important for the simulation of future climate changes. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >A third source of confidence comes from the ability of models to reproduce features of past climates and climate changes. They can reproduce many features (allowing for uncertainties in reconstructing past climates) such as the magnitude and broad-scale pattern of oceanic cooling during the last ice age. Models can also simulate many observed aspects of climate change over the instrumental record. Model global temperature projections made over the last two decades have also been in overall agreement with subsequent observations over that period. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Nevertheless, models still show significant errors. Although these are generally greater at smaller scales, important large-scale problems also remain. The ultimate source of most such errors in that many important small-scale processes cannot be represented explicitly in models, and so must be included in approximate form as they interact with larger-scale features. This is partly due to limitations in computing power, but also results from limitations in scientific understanding or in the availability of detailed observations of some physical processes. Consequently, models continue to display a substantial range of global temperature change in response to specific greenhouse gas forcing. Despite such uncertainties, however, models are unanimous in their prediction of substantial climate warming under greenhouse gas increases, and this warming is of a magnitude consistent with independent estimates derived from other sources, such as from observed climate changes and past climate reconstructions.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Since confidence in the changes projected by global models decreases at smaller scales, other techniques, such as the use of regional climate models, or downscaling methods, have been specifically developed for the study of regional- and local-scale climate change. However, as global models continue to develop, and their resolution continues to improve, they are becoming increasingly useful for investigating important smaller-scale features, such as changes in extreme weather events, and further improvements in regional-scale representation are expected with increased computing power. Models are also becoming more comprehensive in their treatment of the climate system, thus explicitly representing more physical and biophysical processes and interactions considered potentially important for climate change, particularly at longer time scales. Examples are the recent inclusion of plant responses, ocean biological and chemical interactions, and ice sheet dynamics in some global climate models. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" ><span style="font-family:webdings;">In summary, confidence in models comes from their physical basis, and their skill in representing observed climate and past climate changes. Models have proven to be extremely important tools for simulating and understanding climate, and there is considerable confidence that they are able to provide credible quantitative estimates of future climate change, particularly at larger scales. Models continue to have significant limitations, such as in their representation of clouds, which lead to uncertainties in the magnitude and timing, as well as regional details, of predicted climate change. Nevertheless, over several decades of model development, they have consistently provided a robust and unambiguous picture of significant climate warming in response to increasing greenhouse gases.</span> <o:p></o:p></span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-4872171102373745875?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-69497043009339629932007-11-09T15:57:00.000-08:002007-11-09T16:02:54.010-08:00Are the Increases in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases During the Industrial Era Caused by Human Activities?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzT1I-TA4pI/AAAAAAAAACk/U607DLmnMPc/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzT1I-TA4pI/AAAAAAAAACk/U607DLmnMPc/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5130995409992344210" border="0" /></a><br /> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Yes, the increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases during the industrial era are caused by human activities. In fact, the observed increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations does not reveal the full extent of human emissions in that it accounts for only 55% of the carbon dioxide released by human activity since 1959. In all cases, atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, and their increases, are determined by the balance between sources (emissions of the gas from human activities and natural systems) and sinks (the removal of the gas from the atmosphere by conversion to a different chemical compound). Fossil fuel combustion (plus a smaller contribution from cement manufacture) is responsible for more than 75% of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions. Land use change (primarily deforestation) is responsible for the remainder. For methane, another important greenhouse gas, emissions generated by human activities exceeded natural emissions over the last 25 years. For nitrous oxide, emissions generated by human activities are equal to natural emissions in the atmosphere. Most of the long-lived halogen-containing gases (such as chlorofluorocarbons) are manufactured by humans, and were not present in the atmosphere before the industrial era. On average, present-day tropospheric ozone has increased 38% since pre-industrial times, and the increase results from atmospheric reactions of short-lived pollutants emitted by human activity. The recent rate of change is dramatic and unprecedented; increases in carbon dioxide never exceeded 30 ppm in 1 kyr – yet now carbon dioxide has risen by 30 ppm in just the last 17 years.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><b style=""><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Carbon Dioxide<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel combustion, with contributions from cement manufacture, are responsible for more than 75% of the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration since pre-industrial times. The remainder of the increase comes from land use changes dominated by deforestation (and associated biomass burning) with contributions from changing agricultural practices. All these increases are caused by human activity. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Natural processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, decay and sea surface gas exchange lead to massive exchanges, sources and sinks of carbon dioxide between the land and atmosphere, and the ocean and atmosphere. Were it not for the natural sinks taking up nearly half the anthropogenic carbon dioxide over the past 15 years, atmospheric concentrations would have grown even more dramatically.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >The increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is known to be caused by human activities because the character of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, in particular the ratio of its heavy to light condition of fossil fuel carbon. In addition, the ratio of oxygen to nitrogen in the atmosphere has declined as carbon dioxide has increased; this is as expected because oxygen is depleted when fossil fuels are burned. A heavy form of carbon, the carbon-13 isotope, is less abundant in vegetation and in fossil fuels that were formed from past vegetation, and is more abundant in carbon in the oceans and in volcanic or geothermal emissions. The relative amount of the carbon-13 isotope in the atmosphere has been declining, showing that the added carbon comes from fossil fuels and vegetation.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><b style=""><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Halogen-Containing Gases<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Human activities are responsible for the bulk of long-lived atmospheric halogen-containing gas concentrations. Before industrialization, there were only a few naturally occurring halogen-containing gases, for example, methyl bromine and methyl chloride. The development of new techniques for chemical synthesis resulted in a proliferation of chemically manufactured halogen-containing gases during the last 50 years of the 20<sup>th</sup> century. Concentrations of several important halogen-containing gases, including CFCs, are now stabilizing or decreasing at the Earth’s surface as a result of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and its Amendments. Concentrations of HCFCs, production of which is to be phased out by 2030, and of the Kyoto Protocol gases HFCs and PFCs, are currently increasing. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><b style=""><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Methane <o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Methane sources to the atmosphere generated by human activities exceed methane sources from natural systems. Between 1960 and 1999, methane concentrations grew an average of at least six times faster than over any 40-year period of the two millennia before 1800, despite a near-zero growth rate since 1980. The human activities that produce methane include energy production from coal and natural gas, waste disposal in landfills, raising ruminant animals (e.g., cattle and sheep), rice agriculture and biomass burning. Once emitted, methane remains in the atmosphere for approximately 8.4 years before removal, mainly by chemical oxidation in the troposphere.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><b style=""><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Nitrous Oxide<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Nitrous oxide sources to the atmosphere from human activities are approximately equal to nitrous oxide sources from natural systems. Between 1960 and 1999, nitrous oxide concentrations grew an average of at least two times faster than over any 40-year period of the two millennia before 1800. Human activities that emit nitrous oxide include transformation of fertilizer nitrogen into nitrous oxide and its subsequent emission from agricultural soils, biomass burning, raising cattle and some industrial activities, including nylon manufacture. Once emitted, nitrous oxide remains in the atmosphere for approximately 114 years before removal, mainly by destruction in the stratosphere. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><b style=""><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Tropospheric Ozone<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >Tropospheric ozone is produced by photochemical reactions in the atmosphere involving forerunner chemicals such as carbon monoxide, methane, volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides. These chemicals are emitted by natural biological processes and by human activities including land use change and fuel combustion. The increase of 38% (20-50%) in tropospheric ozone since the pre-industrial era is human-caused.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" >It is very likely that the increase in the combined radiative forcing from carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide was at least six times faster between 1960 and 1999 than over any 40-year period during the two millennia prior to the year 1800. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="font-family:webdings;"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:10;" ><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-6949704300933962993?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-40416786422975290482007-11-07T19:43:00.001-08:002007-11-07T19:58:30.404-08:00What Caused the Ice Ages and Other Important Climate Changes Before the Industrial Era?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzKJXOTA4oI/AAAAAAAAACc/IZJaHCpYF0U/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzKJXOTA4oI/AAAAAAAAACc/IZJaHCpYF0U/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5130313957596258946" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:webdings;">Climate on Earth has changed on all time scales, including long before human activity could have placed a role. Great progress has been made in understanding the causes and mechanisms of these climate changes. Changes in Earth's radiation balance were the principal driver of past climate changes, but the causes of such changes are varied. For each case - be it the Ice Ages, the warmth at the time of the dinosaurs or the fluctuations of the past millennium - the specific causes must be established individually. In many cases, this can now be done with good confidence, and many past climate changes can be reproduced with quantitative models.<br /><br />Global climate is determined by the radiation balance of the planet. There are three fundamental ways the Earth's radiation balance can change, thereby causing a climate change: 1) changing the incoming solar radiation (e.g., by changes in the Earth's orbit or in the Sun itself), 2) changing the fraction of solar radiation that is reflected (this fraction is called the albedo - it can be changed, for example, by changes in cloud cover, small particles called aerosols or land cover), and 3) altering the longwave energy radiated back to space (e.g., by changes in greenhouse gas concentrations). In addition, local climate also depends on how heat is distributed by winds and ocean currents.<br /><br />Starting with the ice ages that have come and gone in regular cycles for the past nearly three million years, there is strong evidence that these are linked to regular variations in the Earth's orbit around the Sun, the so-called Milankovitch cycles. These cycles change the amount of solar radiation received at each latitude in each season (but hardly affect the global annual mean), and they can be calculated with astronomical precision. There is still some discussion about how exactly this starts and ends ice ages, but many studies suggest that the amount of summer sunshine on northern continents is crucial: if it drops below a critical value, snow from the past winter does not melt away in summer and an ice sheet starts to grow as more and more snow accumulates. Climate model simulations confirm that an Ice Age can indeed by started in this way, while simple conceptual models have been used to successfully 'hindcast' the onset of past glaciations based on the orbital changes.<br /><br />Although it is not their primary cause, atmospheric carbon dioxide also plays an important role in the ice ages. Antarctic ice core data show that carbon dioxide concentration is low in the cold glacial times, and high in the warm interglacials; atmospheric carbon dioxide follows temperature changes in Antarctica with a lag of some hundreds of years. Because the climate changes at the beginning and end of ice ages take several thousand years, most of these changes are affected by a positive carbon dioxide feedback; that is, a small initial cooling due to Milankovitch cycles is subsequently amplified as the carbon dioxide concentration falls.<br /><br />During the last ice age, over 20 abrupt and dramatic climate shifts occurred that are particularly prominent in records around the northern Atlantic. These differ from the glacial-interglacial cycles in that they probably do not involve large changes in global mean temperature: changes are not synchronous in Greenland and Antarctica, and they are in the opposite direction in the South and North Atlantic. This means that a major change in global radiation balance would not have been needed to cause these shifts; a redistribution of heat within the climate system would have sufficed. This is indeed strong evidence that changes in ocean circulation and heat transport can explain many features of these abrupt events; sediment data and model simulations show that some of these changes could have been triggered by instabilities in the ice sheets surrounding the Atlantic at the time, and the associated freshwater release into the ocean.<br /><br />Much warmer times have also occurred in climate history - during most of the past 500 million years, Earth was probably completely free of ice sheets, unlike today, when Greenland and Antarctica are ice-covered. Data on greenhouse gas abundances going back beyond a million years that is, beyond the reach of antarctic ice cores, are still rather uncertain, but analysis of geological samples suggest that the warm ice-free periods coincide with high atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.<br /><br />Another likely cause of past climate changes in variations in the energy output of the Sun. Measurements over recent decades show that the solar output varies slightly (by close to .1%) in an 11-year cycle. Data correlation and model simulations indicate that solar variability and volcanic activity are likely to be leading reasons for climate variations during the past millennium, before the start of the industrial era.<br /><br />These examples illustrate the different climate changes in the past had different causes. The fact that natural factors caused climate changes in the past does not mean that the current climate change is natural. By analogy, the fact that forest fires have long been caused naturally by lightning strikes does not mean that fires cannot also be caused by a careless camper.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-4041678642297529048?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-83163973471728503532007-11-07T19:37:00.001-08:002007-11-07T19:42:53.228-08:00Is the Current Climate Change Unusual Compared to Earlier Changes in Earth's History?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzKEXeTA4nI/AAAAAAAAACU/CiUIZQ0gYzI/s1600-h/Picture1.png"> </a><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">Climate has changed on all time scales throughout Earth’s history. Some aspects of the current climate change aren’t unusual, but others are. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has reached a record high relative to more than the past half-million years, and has done so at an exceptionally fast rate. Current global temperatures are warmer than they have ever been during at least the past five centuries, probably even for more than a millennium. If warming continues unabated, the resulting climate change within this century would be extremely unusual in geological terms. Another unusual aspect of recent climate change is its cause; past climate changes were natural in origin, whereas most of the warming of the past 50 years is attributable to human activities.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">When comparing the current climate change to earlier, natural ones, three distinctions must be made. First, it must be clear which variable is being compared: is it greenhouse gas concentration or temperature (or some other climate parameter), and is it their absolute value or their rate of change? Second, local changes must not be confused with global changes. Local climate changes are often much larger than global ones, since local factors (e.g., changes in oceanic or atmospheric circulation) can shift the delivery of heat or moisture from one place to another and local feedbacks operate (e.g., sea ice feedback). Large changes in global mean temperature, in contrast, require some global forcing (such as change in greenhouse gas concentration or solar activity). Third, it is necessary to distinguish between time scales. Climate changes over millions of years can be much larger and have different causes (e.g., continental drift) compared to climate changes on a centennial time scale.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">The main reason for the current concern about climate change is the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration (and some other greenhouse gases), which is very unusual for the Quaternary (about the last two million years). The concentration of carbon dioxide is now known accurately for the past 650,000 years from Antarctic ice cores. During this time, carbon dioxide concentration varied between a low of 180 ppm during cold glacial times and a high of 300 ppm during warm interglacials. Over the past century, it rapidly increased well out of this range, and is now 379 ppm. For comparison, the approximately 80-ppm rise in carbon concentration at the end of the past ice ages generally took over 5,000 years.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">Temperature is a more difficult variable to reconstruct than carbon dioxide, as it does not have the same value all over the globe, so that a single record (e.g., an ice core) is only of limited value. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">More meaningful for global changes is an analysis of large-scale averages, where much of the local variations averages out and variability is smaller. Sufficient coverage of instrumental records goes back out only about 150 years. Further back in time, compilations of proxy data from tree rings, ice cores, etc., go back more than a thousand years with decreasing spatial coverage for earlier periods. There are strong indications that a warmer climate, with greatly reduced global ice cover and higher sea level, prevailed until around 3 million years ago. Hence, current warmth appears unusual in the context of the past millennia, but not unusual on longer time scales for which changes in tectonic activity (which can drive natural, slow variations in greenhouse gas concentration) become relevant.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">A different matter is the current rate of warming. Are more rapid global climate changes recorded in proxy data? The largest temperature changes of the past million years are the glacial cycles, during which the global mean temperature changed by 4 Celsius to 7 Celsius between ice ages and warm interglacial periods. However, the data indicate that the global warming at the end of an ice age was a gradual process taking about 5,000 years. It is thus clear that the current rate of global climate change is much more rapid and very unusual in the context of past changes. The much-discussed abrupt climate shifts during glacial times are not counter-examples, since they were probably due to changes in ocean heat transport, which would be unlikely to affect the global mean temperature.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">Further back in time, beyond ice core data, the time resolution of sediment cores and other archives does not resolve changes as rapid as the present warming. Hence, although large climate changes have occurred in the past, there is no evidence that these took place at a faster rate than present warming. If projections of approximately 5 Celsius warming in this century are realized, then the Earth will have experienced about the same amount of global mean warming as it did at the end of the last ice age; there is no evidence that this rate of possible future global change was matched by any comparable global temperature increase of the last 50 million years. <o:p></o:p></span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-8316397347172850353?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-42299682600627856732007-11-07T19:00:00.000-08:002007-11-07T19:31:37.908-08:00Is Sea Level Rising?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzKDE-TA4mI/AAAAAAAAACM/rDhoSKXzlKA/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzKDE-TA4mI/AAAAAAAAACM/rDhoSKXzlKA/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5130307046993879650" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:times new roman;">Yes, there is strong evidence that global sea level gradually rose in the 20th century and is currently rising at an increased rate, after a period of little change between 0 BCE and 1900 BCE. Sea level is projected to rise at an even greater rate in this century. The two major causes of global sea level rise are thermal expansion of the oceans (water expands as it warms) and the loss of land-based ice due to increased melting.<br /><br />Global sea level rose by about 120 meters during the several milennia that followed th end of the last ice age (approximately 21,000 years ago), and stabilized between 3,000 and 2,000 years ago. Sea level indicators suggest that global sea level did not change significantly from then until the late 19th century. The instrumental record of modern sea level change shows evidence for onset of sea level rise during the 19th century. Estimates for the 20th century show that global average sea level rose at a rate of about 1.7 mm per year.<br /><br />Satellite observations available since the early 1990s provide more accurate sea level data with nearly global coverage. This decade-long satellite altimetry data set shows that since 1993, sea level has been rising at a rate of around 3 mm per year, significantly higher than the average during the previous half century.<br /><br />In agreement with climate models, satellite data and hydrographic observations show that sea level is not rising uniformly around the world. In some regions, rates are up to several times the global mean rise, while in other regions sea level is falling. Spatial variability of the rates of sea level rise is mostly due to non-uniform changes in temperature and salinity and related to changes in the ocean circulation.<br /><br />Near-global ocean temperature data sets made available in recent years allow a direct calculation of thermal expansion. It is believed that on average, over the period from 1961 to 2003, thermal expansion contributed about one-quarter of the observed sea level rise, while melting of land ice accounted for less than half. Thus, the full magnitude of the observed sea level rise during that period was not satisfactorily explained by those data sets, as reported in the IPCC Third Assessment Report.<br /><br />During recent years (1993-2003), for which the observing system is much better, thermal expansion and melting of land ice each account for about half of the observed sea level rise, although there is some uncertainty in the estimates.<br /><br />The reasonable agreement in recent years between the observed rate of sea level rise and the sum of thermal expansion and loss of land ice suggests an upper limit for the magnitude of change in land-based water storage, which is relatively poorly known.<br /><br />Global sea level is projected to rise during the 21st century at a greater rate than during 1961 to 2003. Under the IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) A1B scenario by the mid-2090s, for instance, global sea level reaches .22 to .44 m above 1990 levels, and is rising at about 4 mm per year. Thermal expansion is projected to contribute more than half of the average rise, but land ice will lose mass increasingly rapidly as the century progresses. An important uncertainty relates to whether discharge of ice from the ice sheets will continue to increase as a consequence of accelerated ice flow, as has been observed in recent years. This would add to the amount of sea level rise, but quantitative projections of how much it would add cannot be made with confidence, owing to limited understanding of the relevant processes.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-4229968260062785673?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-23503561157500889932007-11-06T21:15:00.000-08:002007-11-06T21:29:42.541-08:00Is the Amount of Snow and Ice on the Earth Decreasing?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzFNFxxoYeI/AAAAAAAAAB8/8WGI5TlTYgw/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzFNFxxoYeI/AAAAAAAAAB8/8WGI5TlTYgw/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129966212207895010" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:courier new;"><span style="font-family: webdings;">Yes. Observations show a global-scale decline of snow and ice over many years, especially since 1980 and increasing during the past decade, despite growth in some places and little change in others. Most mountain glaciers are getting smaller. Snow cover is retreating earlier in the spring. Sea ice in the Arctic is shrinking in all seasons, most dramatically in summer. Reductions are reported in permafrost, seasonally frozen ground and river and lake ice. Important coastal regions of the ice sheets on Greenland and West Antarctica, and the glaciers of the Antarctic Peninsula, are thinning and contributing to sea level rise. The total contribution of glacier, ice cap and ice sheet melt to sea level rise is estimated as 1.2 (+ or -) .4 mm per year for the period 1993 to 2003.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: webdings;">Continuous satellite measurements capture most of the Earth's seasonal snow cover on land, and reveal that Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover has declined by about 2% per decade since 1966, although there is little change in autumn or early winter.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: webdings;">Satellite data does not yet allow similarly reliable measurement of ice conditions on lakes and rivers, or in seasonally or permanently frozen ground. However, numerous local and regional reports have been published, and generally seem to indicate warming of permafrost, an increase in thickness of the summer thawed layer over permafrost, a decrease in winter freeze depth in seasonally frozen areas, a decrease in areal extent of permafrost and a decrease in duration of seasonal river and lake ice.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: webdings;">Since 1978, satellite data have provided continuous coverage of sea ice extent in both polar regions. For the Arctic, average annual sea ice extent has decreased by 2.7 (+ or -) .6% per decade, while summer sea ice extent has decreased by 7.4 (+ or -) 2.4% per decade. The antarctic sea ice extent exhibits no significant trend. Thickness data, especially from submarines, are available but restricted to the central Arctic, where they indicate thinning of approximately 40% between the period 1958 to 1977 and the 1990s.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: webdings;">Most mountain glaciers and ice caps have been shrinking, with the retreat probably having started about 1850. Although many Northern Hemisphere glaciers had a few years of near balance around 1970, this was followed by increased shrinkage. Melting of glaciers and ice caps contributed .77 (+ or -) .22 mm per year to sea level rise between 1991 and 2004.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: webdings;">Taken together, the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica are very likely shrinking, with Greenland contributing about .2 (+ or -) .1 mm per year and Antarctica contributing .2 (+ or -) .35 mm per year to sea level rise over the period 1993 to 2003. There is evidence of accelerated loss through 2005. Thickening of high-altitude, cold regions of Greenland and East Antarctica, perhaps from increased snowfall has been more than offset by thinning in coastal regions of Greenland and West Antarctica in response to increased ice outflow and increased Greenland surface melting.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: webdings;">Ice interacts with the surrounding climate in complex ways, so the causes of specific changes are not always clear. Nonetheless, it is an unavoidable fact that ice melts when the local temperature is above the freezing point. Reductions in snow cover and in mountain glaciers have occurred despite increased snowfall in many cases, implicating increased air temperatures. Observed arctic sea ice reductions can be simulated fairly well in models driven by historical circulation and temperature changes. The observed increased in snowfall on ice sheets in some cold central regions, surface melting in coastal regions, and sub-ice-shelf melting along many coasts are all consistent with warming. The geographically widespread nature of these snow and ice changes suggests that widespread warming is the cause of the Earth's overall loss of ice.</span><br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-2350356115750088993?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-55105396161344191612007-11-06T19:48:00.001-08:002007-11-06T20:39:51.878-08:00Has there been a Change in Extreme Events like Heat Waves, Droughts, Floods and Hurricanes?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzFBkBxoYdI/AAAAAAAAAB0/SX_1q-mh_Is/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzFBkBxoYdI/AAAAAAAAAB0/SX_1q-mh_Is/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129953537759404498" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:webdings;">Since 1950, the number of heat waves has increased and widespread increases have occurred in the numbers of warm nights. The extent of regions affected by droughts has also increased as precipitation over land has marginally decreased while evaporation has increased due to warmer conditions. Tropical storm and hurricane frequencies vary from year to year, but evidence suggests substantial increases in intensity and duration since the 1970s.<br /><br />In several regions of the world, indications of changes in various types of extreme climate events have been found. The extremes are commonly considered to be the values exceeded 1, 5 and 10% of the time (at one extreme) or 90, 95 and 99% of the time (at the other extreme). The warm nights or hot days (discussed below) are those exceeding the 90th percentile of temperature, while cold nights or days are those falling below the 10th percentile.<br /><br />In the last 50 years for the land areas sampled, there has been a significant decrease in the annual occurrence of cold nights and a significant increase in the annual occurrence of warm nights. The distributions of minimum and maximum temperatures have not only shifted to higher values, consistent with the overall warming, but the cold extremes have warmed more than the warm extremes over the last 50 years. More warm extremes imply an increased frequency of heat waves. Further supporting indications include the observed trend towards fewer frost days associated with the average warming in most mid-latitude regions.<br /><br />A prominent indication of a change in extremes is the observed evidence of increases in heavy precipitation events over the mid-latitudes in the last 50 years, even in places where mean precipitation amounts are not increasing.<br /><br />Drought is easier to measure because of its long duration. While there are numerous indices and metrics of drought, many studies use monthly precipitation totals and temperature averages combined into a measure called the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). The PDSI calculated from the middle of the 20th century shows a large drying trend over many Northern Hemisphere land areas since the mid-1950s, with widespread drying over much of southern Eurasia, northern Africa, Canada, and Alaska, and an opposite trend in eastern North and South America. In the Southern Hemisphere, land surfaces were wet in the 1970s and relatively dry in the 1960s and 1990s, and there was a drying trend from 1974 to 1998. Decreases in precipitation over land since the 1950s are the likely main cause for the drying trends, although large surface warming during the last two to three decades has also likely contributed to the drying. One study shows that very dry land areas across the globe (defined as areas with a PDSI of less than -3.0) have more than doubled in extent since the 1970s, associated with an initial precipitation decrease over land related to the El Nino-Southern Oscillation and with subsequent increases primarily due to surface warming.<br /><br />Changes in tropical storm and hurricane frequency and intensity are masked by large natural variability. The El Nino-Southern Oscillation greatly affects the location and activity of tropical storms around the world. Globally, estimates of the potential destructiveness of hurricanes show a substantial upward trend since the mid-1970s, with a trend towards longer storm duration and greater storm intensity, and the activity is strongly correlated with tropical sea surface temperature. Specifically, the number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes increased by about 75% since 1970. The largest increases were in the North Pacific, Indian, and Southwest Pacific Oceans.<br /><br />Based on a variety of measures at the surface and in the upper troposphere, it is likely that there has been a poleward shift as well as an increase in Northern Hemisphere winter storm track activity over the second half of the 20th century. These changes are part of variations that have occurred related to the North Atlantic Oscillation. Observations from 1979 to the mid-1990s reveal a tendency towards a stronger December to February circumpolar westerly atmospheric circulation throughout the troposphere and lower stratosphere, together with poleward displacements of jet streams and increased storm track activity.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-5510539616134419161?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-30598370971785448962007-11-05T21:40:00.000-08:002007-11-06T16:00:35.585-08:00How is Precipitation Changing?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzEAHBxoYcI/AAAAAAAAABs/6Rb0ss5W3VM/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/RzEAHBxoYcI/AAAAAAAAABs/6Rb0ss5W3VM/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129881571287392706" border="0" /></a><br /><img src="file:///C:/Users/Yimbie/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpg" alt="" /><span style="font-family:lucida grande;">Pronounced long-term trends from 1900 to 2005 have been observed in precipitation amount in some places: significantly wetter in eastern North and South America, northern Europe and northern and central Asia, but drier in the Sahel, southern Africa, the Mediterranean and southern Asia. More precipitation now falls as rain rather than snow in northern regions. Widespread increases in heavy precipitation events have been observed even in places where total amounts have decreased. These changes are associated with increased water vapor in the atmosphere arising from the warming of the world's oceans, especially at lower latitudes.<br /><br />Precipitation is the general term for rainfall, snowfall, and other forms of frozen or liquid water falling from clouds. Precipitation is intermittent, and the character of the precipitation when it occurs depends greatly on temperature and the weather situations. Precipitation forms as water vapor condenses, usually in rising air that expands and hence cools. The upward motion comes from air rising over mountains, warm air riding over cooler air (warm front), colder air pushing under warmer air (cold front), convection from local heating of the surface, and other weather and cloud systems. Hence, changes in any of these aspects alter precipitation. As precipitation maps tend to be spotty, overall trends in precipitation are indicated by the Palmer Drought Severity Index, which is a measure of soil moisture using precipitation and crude estimates of changes in evaporation.<br /><br />A consequence of increased heating from the human-induced enhanced greenhouse effect is increased evaporation, provided that adequate surface moisture is available (as it always is over the oceans and other wet surfaces). Hence, surface moisture effectively acts as an 'air conditioner', as heat used for evaporation acts to moisten the air rather than warm it. An observed consequence of this is that summers often tend to be either warm and dry or cool and wet. In the areas of eastern North and South America where it has become wetter, temperatures have therefore increased less than elsewhere. Over northern continents in winter, however, more precipitation is associated with higher temperatures, as the water holding capacity of the atmosphere increases in warmer conditions. However, in these regions, where precipitation has generally increased somewhat, increases in temperatures have increased drying, making the precipitation changes less evident.<br /><br />Warming accelerates land surface drying and increases the potential incidence and severity of droughts, which has been observed in many places worldwide. However, a well-established physical law (the Clausius-Clapeyron relation) determines that the water-holding capacity of the atmosphere increases by about 7% for every 1 Celsius rise in temperatures.<br /><br />Over the 20th century, based on changes in sea surface temperatures, it is estimated that atmospheric water vapor increased by about 5% in the atmosphere over the oceans. Because precipitation comes mainly from weather systems that feed on the water vapor stored in the atmosphere, this has generally increased precipitation intensify and the risk of heavy rain and snow events. Basic theory, climate model simulations and empirical evidence all confirm that warmer climates, owing to increased water vapor, lead to more intense precipitation events even when the total annual precipitation is reduced slightly, and with prospects for even stronger events when the overall precipitation amounts increase. The warmer climate therefore increases risks of both drought - where it is not raining - and floods - where it is - but at different times and/or places. For instance, the summer of 2002 in Europe brought widespread floods but was followed a year later in 2003 by record-breaking heat waves and drought.<br /><br />In areas where aerosol pollution masks the ground from direct sunlight, decreases in evaporation reduce the overall moisture supply to the atmosphere. Hence, even as the potential for heavier precipitation results from increased water vapor amounts, the duration and frequency of events may be curtailed, as it takes longer to recharge the atmosphere with water vapor.<br /><br />Local and regional changes in the character of precipitation also depend a great deal on atmospheric circulation patterns determined by El Nino, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO; a measure of westerly wind strength over the North Atlantic in winter) and other patterns of variability. Some of these observed circulation changes are associated with climate change. An associated shift in the storm track makes some regions wetter and some - often nearby - drier, making for complex patterns of change.<br /><br />The prolonged drought in the Sahel, which was pronounced from the later 1960s to the late 1980s, continues although it is not quite as intense as it was; it has been linked, through changes in atmospheric circulation, to changes in tropical sea surface temperature patterns in the Pacific, Indian and Atlantic Basins. Drought has become widespread throughout much of Africa and more common in the tropics and subtropics.<br /><br />As temperatures rise, the likelihood of precipitation falling as rain rather than snow increases, especially in autumn and spring at the beginning and end of the snow season, and in areas where temperatures are near freezing. Such changes are observed in many places, especially over land in middle and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, leading to increased rains but reduced snowpacks, and consequently diminished water resources in summer, when they are most needed. The long-term record emphasizes that patterns of precipitation vary somewhat from year to year, and even prolonged multi-year droughts are usually punctuated by a year of heavy rains; for instance as El Nino influences are felt.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-3059837097178544896?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-61214439063770925802007-11-05T14:25:00.000-08:002007-11-05T14:47:15.562-08:00How are Temperatures on Earth Changing?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry-dYxxoYbI/AAAAAAAAABM/KPs9r-R7hDw/s1600-h/Picture3-1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry-dYxxoYbI/AAAAAAAAABM/KPs9r-R7hDw/s320/Picture3-1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129491549602210226" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:georgia;">Instrumental observations over the past 157 years show that temperatures at the surface have risen globally, with important regional variations. For the global average, warming in the last century has occurred in two phases, from the 1910s to the 1940s (.35 Celsius) and more strongly from the 1970s to the present (.55 Celsius). An increasing rate of warming has taken place over the last 25 years, and 11 of the 12 warmest years on record have occurred in the past 12 years. Above the surface, global observations since the late 1950s show that the troposphere (up to about 10 km) has warmed at a slightly greater rate than the surface, while the stratosphere (abut 10-30 km) has cooled markedly since 1979. Confirmation of global warming comes from warming of the oceans, rising sea levels, glaciers melting, sea ice retreating in the Arctic and diminished snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere.<br /><br />Individual thermometer measurements taken every day at several thousand stations over the land areas of the world are combined with thousands more measurements of sea surface temperature taken from ships moving over the oceans to produce an estimate of global average temperature each month. It is now possible to use these measurements from 1850 to the present, although coverage is much less than global in the second half of the 19th century, is much better after 1957 when measurements began in Antarctica, and best after about 1980, when satellite measurements began.<br /><br />Expressed as a global average, surface temperatures have increased by about .74 Celsius over the past hundred years (between 1906 and 2005). There was not much overall change from 1850 to about 1915, aside from ups and downs associated with natural variability but which may have also partly arisen from poor sampling. An increase (.35 Celsius) occurred in the global average temperature from the 1910s to the 1940s, followed by a slight cooling (.1 Celsius), and then a rapid warming (.55 Celsius) up to the end of 2006. The warmest years of the series are 1998 and 2005 (which are statistically indistinguishable), and 11 of the 12 warmest years have occurred in the last 12 years (1995 to 2006). Warming, particularly since the 1970s, has generally been greater over land than over the oceans.<br /><br />A few areas have cooled since 1901, most notably the northern North Atlantic near southern Greenland. Warming during this time has been strongest over the continental interiors of Asia and northern North America. However, as thees are areas with large year-to-year variability, the most evident warming signal has occurred in parts of the middle and lower latitudes, particularly the tropical oceans.<br /><br />Analysis of long-term changes in daily temperature extremes has recently become possible for many regions of the world (parts of North America and southern South America, Europe, northern and eastern Asia, southern Africa and Australasia). Especially since the 1950s, these records show a decrease in the number of very cold days and nights and an increase in the number of extremely hot days and warm nights. The length of the frost-free season has increased in most mid- and high-latitude regions of both hemispheres.<br /><br />In addition to the surface data described above, measurements of temperature above the surface have been made with weather balloons, with reasonable coverage over land since 1958, and from satellite data since 1979. All data are adjusted for changes in instruments and observing practices where necessary. Despite several new analyzes with improved cross-calibration of the 13 instruments on different satellites used since 1979 and compensation for changes in observing time and satellite altitude, some uncertainties remain in trends.<br /><br />For global observations since the late 1950s, the most recent versions of all available data sets show that the troposphere has warmed at a slightly greater rate than the surface, while the stratosphere has cooled markedly since 1979. This is in accord with physical expectations and most model results, which demonstrate the role of increasing greenhouse gases in tropospheric warming and stratospheric cooling; ozone depletion also contribute substantially to stratospheric cooling.<br /><br />Consistent with observed increases in surface temperature, there have been decreases in the length of river and lake ice seasons. Further, there has been an almost worldwide reduction in glacial mass and extent in the 20th century; melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet has recently become apparent; snow cover has decreased in many Northern Hemisphere regions; sea ice thickness and extent have decreased in the Arctic in all seasons, most dramatically in spring and summer; the oceans are warming; and sea level is rising due to thermal expansion of the oceans and melting of land ice.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-6121443906377092580?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-17912483491332138642007-11-05T13:51:00.000-08:002007-11-05T14:24:45.531-08:00How do Human Activities Contribute to Climate Change and How do They Compare with Natural Influences?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry-XmBxoYZI/AAAAAAAAAA8/S5OLzFYG4HQ/s1600-h/Picture2-1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry-XmBxoYZI/AAAAAAAAAA8/S5OLzFYG4HQ/s320/Picture2-1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129485180165710226" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:verdana;"><span style="font-family:webdings;">Human activities contribute to climate change by causing changes in Earth's atmosphere in the amounts of greenhouse gases, aerosols (small particles), and cloudiness. The largest known contribution comes from the burning of fossil fuels, which releases carbon dioxide gas to the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases and aerosols affect climate by altering incoming solar radiation and outgoing infrared (thermal) radiation that are part of Earth's energy balance. Changing the atmospheric abundance or properties of these gases and particles can lead to a warming or cooling of the climate system. Since the start of the industrial era (about 1750), the overall effect of human activities on climate has been a warming influence. The human impact on climate during this era greatly exceeds that due to known changes in natural processes, such as solar changes and volcanic eruptions.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Greenhouse Gases<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></span>Human activities result in emissions of four principal greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and the halocarbons (a group of gases containing flourine, chlorine, and bromine). These gases accumulate in the atmosphere, causing concentrations to increase with time. Significant increases in all of these gases have occurred in the industrial era. All of these increases are attributable to human activities.<br /><br /></span></span><br /><ul><li><span style="font-family:webdings;">Carbon dioxide has increased from fossil fuel use in transportation, building heating and cooling, and the manufacture of cement and other goods. Deforestation releases carbon dioxide and reduces its uptake by plants. Carbon dioxide is also released in natural processes such as the decay of plant matter.</span></li><li><span style="font-family:webdings;">Methane has increased as a result of human activities related to agriculture, natural gas distribution and landfills. Methane is also released from natural processes that occur, for example, in wetlands.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-family:webdings;">Nitrous oxide is also emitted by human activities such as fertilizer use and fossil fuel burning. Natural processes in soils and the oceans also release nitrous oxide.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-family:webdings;">Halocarbon gas concentrations have increased primarily due to human activities. Principal halocarbons include the chlorofluorocarbons (e.g., CFC-11 and CFC-12), which were used extensively as refrigeration agents and in other industrial processes before their presence in the atmosphere was found to cause stratospheric ozone depletion. The abundance of chlorofluorocarbon gases is decreasing as a result of international regulations designed to protect the ozone layer.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-family:webdings;">Ozone is a greenhouse gas that is continually produced and destroyed in the atmosphere by chemical reactions. In the troposphere, human activities have increased ozone through the release of gases such as carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxide, which chemically react to produce ozone. As mentioned above, halocarbons released by human activities destroy ozone in the stratosphere and have caused the ozone hole over Antarctica.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-family:webdings;">Water vapor is the most abundant and important greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. However, human activities have only a small direct influence on the amount of atmospheric water vapor. Indirectly, humans have the potential to affect water vapor substantially by changing climate. For example, a warmer atmosphere contain more water vapor. Human activities also influence water vapor through methane emissions because methane undergoes chemical destruction in the stratosphere, producing a small amount of water vapor.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-family:webdings;">Aerosols are small particles present in the atmosphere with widely varying size, concentration, and chemical composition. Aerosols contain both naturally occurring compounds and those emitted as a result of human activities. Fossil fuel and biomass burning have increased aerosols containing sulphur compounds, organic compounds and black carbon (soot). Human activities such as surface mining and industrial processes have increased dust in the atmosphere.<br /></span></li></ul><span style="font-weight: bold;font-family:webdings;" >Radiative Forcing of Factors Affected by Human Activities<br /><br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry-X6hxoYaI/AAAAAAAAABE/ZmsKPA4btOo/s1600-h/Picture2-2.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry-X6hxoYaI/AAAAAAAAABE/ZmsKPA4btOo/s320/Picture2-2.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129485532353028514" border="0" /></a><span style="font-family:webdings;">The contributions to radiative forcing from some of the factors influenced by human activities are shown in Figure 2. The values reflect the total forcing relative to the start of the industrial era (about 1750). The forcings for all greenhouse gas increases, which are the best understood of those due to human activities, are positive because each gas absorbs outgoing infrared radiation in the atmosphere. Among the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide increases have caused the largest forcing over this period.<br /><br />Aerosol particles influence radiative forcing directly through reflection and absorption of solar and infrared radiation in the atmosphere. Some aerosols cause a positive forcing while others cause a negative forcing. The direct radiative forcing summed over all aerosol types is negative.<br /><br />Human activities since the industrial era have altered the nature of land cover over the globe, principally through changes in croplands, pastures, and forests. They have also modified the reflective properties of ice and snow. Overall, it is likely that more solar radiation is now being reflected from Earth's surface as a result of human activities.<br /><br />Aircraft produce persistent linear trails of condensation in regions that have suitably low temperatures and high humidity. Contrails are a form of cirrus cloud that reflect solar radiation and absorb infrared radiation. Linear contrails from global aircraft operations have increased Earth's cloudiness and are estimated to cause a small positive radiative forcing.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Radiative Forcing from Natural Changes</span><br /><br />Natural forcings arise due to solar changes and explosive volcanic eruptions. Solar output has increased gradually in the industrial era, causing a small positive radiative forcing. Solar energy directly heats the climate system and can also affect the atmospheric abundance of some greenhouse gases, such as stratospheric ozone. Explosive volcanic eruptions can create a short-lived negative forcing through the temporary increases that occur in sulphate aerosol in the stratosphere. The stratosphere is currently free of volcanic aerosol, since the last major eruption was in 1991.<br /><br />The differences in radiative forcing estimates between the present day and the start of the industrial era for solar irradiance changes and volcanoes are both very small compared to the differences in radiative forcing estimated to have resulted from human activities. As a result, in today's atmosphere, the radiative forcing from human activities is much more important for current and future climate change than the estimated radiative forcing from changes in natural processes.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-1791248349133213864?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-44810601285480395892007-11-04T22:10:00.000-08:002007-11-04T22:22:43.903-08:00What is the Greenhouse Effect?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry62ihxoYXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/WFOTTBR8lIA/s1600-h/Picture3.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry62ihxoYXI/AAAAAAAAAAo/WFOTTBR8lIA/s320/Picture3.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129237729919918450" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:lucida grande;">The Sun powers Earth's climate, radiating energy at very short wavelengths, predominately in the visible or near-visible (e.g., ultraviolet) part of the spectrum. Roughly 1/3 of the solar energy that reaches the top of the Earth's atmosphere is reflected directly back to space. The remaining 2/3 is absorbed by the surface and, to a lesser extent, the Earth must, on average, radiate the same amount of energy back to space. Because the Earth is much colder than the Sun, it radiates at much longer wavelengths, primarily in the infrared part of the spectrum. Much of this thermal radiation emitted by the land and ocean is absorbed by the atmosphere, including clouds, and reradiated back to Earth. This is called the <span style="font-weight: bold;">greenhouse effect</span>.<br /><br />Without the natural greenhouse effect, the average temperature at Earth's surface would be below the freezing point of water. Thus, Earth's natural greenhouse effect makes life as we know it possible. However, human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels and clearing of forests, have greatly intensified the natural greenhouse effect, causing global warming.<br /><br />Water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas, and carbon dioxide is the second-most important one. Methane, nitrous oxide, ozone and several other gases present in the atmosphere in small amounts also contribute to the greenhouse effect. In the cold, dry polar regions, the effect of a small increase in carbon dioxide or water vapor is much greater. The same is true for the cold, dry upper atmosphere where a small increase in water vapor has a greater influence on the greenhouse effect than the same change in water vapor would have near the surface.<br /><br />Several components of the climate system, notably the oceans and living things, affect atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. A prime example of this is plants taking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and converting it (and water) into carbohydrates via photosynthesis. In the industrial era, human activities have added greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, primarily through the burning of fossil fuels and clearing of forests.<br /><br />Adding more of a greenhouse gas, such as carbon dioxide, to the atmosphere intensifies the greenhouse effect, thus warming Earth's climate. The amount of warming depends on various feedback mechanisms. For example, as the atmosphere warms due to rising levels of greenhouse gases, its concentrations on water vapor increases, further intensifying the greenhouse effect. This in turn causes more warming, which causes an additional increase in water vapor, in a self-reinforcing cycle. This water vapor feedback may be strong enough to approximately double the increase in the greenhouse effect due to the added carbon dioxide alone.<br /><br />Additional important feedback mechanisms involve clouds. Clouds are effective at absorbing infrared radiation and therefore exert a large greenhouse effect, thus warming the Earth. Clouds are also effective at reflecting away incoming solar radiation, thus cooling the Earth. Much research is in progress to better understand how clouds change in response to climate warming, and how these changes affect climate through various feedback mechanisms.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-4481060128548039589?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-318717498711404412007-11-04T21:52:00.000-08:002007-11-04T22:09:09.610-08:00What is the Relationship between Climate Change and Weather?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry6zeBxoYWI/AAAAAAAAAAg/ZOX114hPYH8/s1600-h/Picture2.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry6zeBxoYWI/AAAAAAAAAAg/ZOX114hPYH8/s320/Picture2.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129234354075623778" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:times new roman;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Climate </span>is generally defined as average weather, and as such, climate change and weather are intertwined. While weather and climate change are closely related, there are important differences. A common confusion between weather and climate arises when scientists are asked how they can predict climate 50 years from now when they cannot predict the weather a few weeks from now. The chaotic nature of weather makes it unpredictable beyond a few days. Projecting changes in climate due to changes in atmospheric composition or other factors is a very different and much more manageable issue. As an analogy, while it is impossible to predict the age at which any particular man will die, we can say with high confidence that the average age of death for men in industrialized countries is about 75 years old.<br /><br />Another common confusion of these issues is thinking that a cold winter or a cooling spot on the globe is evidence against global warming. There are always extremes of hot and cold, although their frequency and intensity change as climate changes. But when weather is averaged over space and time, the fact that the globe is warming emerges clearly from the data.<br /><br />Using physics-based concepts that govern how the atmosphere moves, warms, cools, rains, snows, and evaporates water, meteorologists are typically able to predict the weather successfully several days into the future. A major limiting factor to the predictability of weather beyond several days is a fundamental dynamical property of the atmosphere. In the 1960s, meteorologist Edward Lorenz discovered that very slight differences in initial conditions can produce very different forecast results. This is the so-called <span style="font-weight: bold;">butterfly effect</span>: a butterfly flapping its wings in one place can, in principle, after the subsequent weather pattern in a distant place. At the core of this effect is <span style="font-weight: bold;">chaos theory</span>, which deals with how small changes in certain variable can cause apparent randomness in complex systems.<br /><br />Nevertheless, chaos theory does not imply a total lack of order. For example, slightly different conditions early in its history might alter the day a storm system would arrive or the exact path it would take, but the average temperature and precipitation would still be about the same for that region and that period of time. Climate can be viewed as concerning the status of the entire Earth system, including the atmosphere, land, oceans, snow, ice and living things that serve as the global background conditions that determine weather patterns.<br /><br />The march of the seasons is due to changes in the geographical patterns of energy absorbed and radiated away by the Earth system. Likewise, projections of future climate are shaped by fundamental changes in heat energy in the Earth system, in particular the increasing intensity of the greenhouse effect that traps heat near Earth's surface, determined by the amount of carbon dioxide and other <span style="font-weight: bold;">greenhouse gases</span> in the atmosphere. Projecting changes in climate due to changes in greenhouse gases 50 years from now is a very different and much more easily solved problem than forecasting weather patterns just weeks from now. As an example, while we cannot predict the outcome of a single coin toss or roll of the dice, we can predict the statistical behavior of a large number of such trials.<br /><br />While many factors continue to influence climate, scientists have determined that human activities have become a dominant force, and are responsible for most of the warming observed over the past 50 years. Human-caused climate change has resulted primarily from changes in the amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, but also from changes in small particles (<span style="font-weight: bold;">aerosols</span>), as well as from changes in land use, for example. As climate changes, the probabilities of certain types of weather events are affected.<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-31871749871140441?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6596821472549426801.post-60884159747663016002007-11-04T21:17:00.000-08:002007-11-04T22:10:06.327-08:00What Factors Determine Earth's Climate?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry6txRxoYVI/AAAAAAAAAAU/oY-pNM2zG4Y/s1600-h/Picture1.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xfTOHvyTX0Q/Ry6txRxoYVI/AAAAAAAAAAU/oY-pNM2zG4Y/s320/Picture1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129228087718338898" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><span style="font-family:verdana;"><span style="font-family:webdings;">The climate system is a complex, interactive system consisting of the atmosphere, land surface, snow and ice, oceans and other bodies of water, and living things. The atmospheric component of the climate system most obviously characterizes climate; climate is often defined as '<span style="font-weight: bold;">average weather</span>'. Climate is usually described in terms of the mean and variability of temperature, precipitation, and wind over a period of time, ranging from months to millions of years. The climate system evolves in time under the influence of its own internal dynamics and due to changes in external factors that affect climate (called '<span style="font-weight: bold;">forcings</span>'). These external forcings include natural phenomena such as volcanic eruptions and solar variations, as well as human-induced changes in atmospheric composition. Solar radiation powers the climate system. There are 3 fundamental ways to change the radiation balance of the Earth: 1) by changing the incoming solar radiation (e.g., by changes in Earth's orbit or in the Sun itself); 2) by changing the fraction of solar radiation that is reflected (called '<span style="font-weight: bold;">albedo</span>'; e.g., by changes in cloud cover, atmospheric particles, or vegetation); and 3) by altering the longwave radiation from Earth back towards space (e.g., by changing greenhouse gas concentrations).<br /><br />About 30% of the sunlight that reaches the top of the atmosphere is reflected back to space. Roughly 2/3 of this reflectivity is due to clouds and small particles in the atmosphere known as '<span style="font-weight: bold;">aerosols</span>'. Light-colored areas of Earth's surface - mainly snow, ice, and deserts - reflect the remaining 1/3 of the sunlight. The most dramatic change in aerosol-produced reflectivity comes when major volcanic eruptions eject material very high into the atmosphere. Rain typically clears aerosols out of the atmosphere in a week or two, but when material from a violent volcanic eruption is projected far above the highest cloud, these aerosols typically influence the climate for about a year or two before falling into the troposphere and being carried to the surface by precipitation. Major volcanic eruptions can thus cause a drop in mean global surface temperature of about 1/2 degree Celsius that can last for months or even years.<br /><br />The energy that is not reflected back to space is absorbed by the Earth's surface and atmosphere. To balance the incoming energy, the Earth itself must radiate, on average, the same amount of energy back to space. The Earth does this by emitting outgoing longwave radiation. Everything on Earth emits longwave radiation continuously. To emit the same amount of radiation that is absorbed by the Earth's surface and atmosphere, the surface would have to have a temperature of around -19 degrees Celsius. This is much colder than the conditions that actually exist at the Earth's surface (which is about 14 degrees Celsius).<br /><br />The reason the Earth's surface is this warm is the presence of greenhouse gases, which act as a partial blanket for the longwave radiation coming from the surface. The most important greenhouse gases are <span style="font-weight: bold;">water vapor</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">carbon dioxide</span>. The 2 most abundant constituents of the atmosphere - nitrogen and oxygen - have no such effect. Clouds, on the other hand, do exert a blanketing effect similar to that of the greenhouse gases; however, this effect is offset by their reflectivity, such that on average, clouds tend to have a cooling effect on climate. Human activities intensify the blanketing effect through the release of greenhouse gases. For instance, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased by about 35% in the industrial era, and this increase is known to be due to human activities, primarily the combustion of fossil fuels and removal of forests. Thus, humankind has dramatically altered the chemical composition of the global atmosphere with substantial implications for climate.<br /><br />Because the Earth is a sphere, more solar energy arrives for a given surface area in the tropics than at higher latitudes, where sunlight strikes the atmosphere at a lower angle. Energy is transported from the equatorial areas to higher latitudes via atmospheric and oceanic circulations, including storm systems. Energy is also required to evaporate water from the sea or land surface, and this energy, called <span style="font-weight: bold;">latent heat</span>, is released when water vapor condenses in clouds. Atmospheric circulation is primarily driven by the release of this latent heat. Atmospheric circulation in turn drives much of the ocean circulation through the action of winds on the surface waters of the ocean, and through changes in the ocean's surface temperature and salinity through precipitation and evaporation.<br /><br />Embedded in the mid-latitude westerly winds are large-scale weather systems that act to transport heat toward the poles. These weather systems are the familiar migrating low- and high-pressure systems and their associated cold and warm fronts. Because of the wave patterns, a particularly cold winter over North America may be associated with a particularly warm winter elsewhere in the hemisphere. Changes in various aspects of the climate system, such as the size of the ice sheets, the type and distribution of vegetation or the temperature of the atmosphere or ocean will influence the large-scale circulation features of the atmosphere and oceans.<br /><br />There are many feedback mechanisms in the climate system that can either amplify ('<span style="font-weight: bold;">positive feedback</span>') or diminish ('<span style="font-weight: bold;">negative feedback</span>') the effects of a change in climate forcing. Detecting, understanding and accurately quantifying climate feedbacks have been the focus of a great deal of research by scientists unraveling the complexities of Earth's climate.<br /><br /><br /></span></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6596821472549426801-6088415974766301600?l=www.studentsonclimatechange.com'/></div>Students on Climate Changehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02714854739425926670noreply@blogger.com0