tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6008229.post112553404249424878..comments2009-07-10T14:17:13.225-07:00Iron Yuppiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10807988020305423467noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6008229.post-1126570065916915482005-09-12T17:07:00.000-07:002005-09-12T17:07:00.000-07:00You have a good point, but I'd love to think that something that was XUL/Avalon based could be just as portable and still have all the richness that a thick client can provide. Tying things this rich to the browser just doesn't seem right.Iron Yuppiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10807988020305423467noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6008229.post-1125598549175535042005-09-01T11:15:00.000-07:002005-09-01T11:15:00.000-07:00Hmmm...I'd beg to differ on the thick client vs. browser. Why? I'm typing this on my Thinkpad at work (listening to Pandora in the background) and at home us a Mac OS X box with a big cinema display, Soundsticks (subwoofer and "stick" tweeters) that is awesome. Last night I also used it from Firefox on Linux.<BR/><BR/>I'd hate to have to have three thick clients on platforms all over the place. By the way, did a post about Pandora last night if you want to read it: http://borsch.typepad.com/ctd/2005/09/pandora_your_pe.htmlstevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09298702700923995509noreply@blogger.com