tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5852239505901018331.post5560057548030577592..comments2008-02-22T19:08:42.179ZDavid Carterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12446185549515040966noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5852239505901018331.post-55545161043849428372008-02-22T19:08:00.000Z2008-02-22T19:08:00.000ZThanks for contributing Bradley. I'm not saying that all open source is bad, simply that for a serious commercial site, more careful planning and execution is required.<BR/><BR/>I'm sure there are plenty of big ticket development companies out there that get things wrong, but I haven't experienced that yet.<BR/><BR/>If I do, not only will I post about it, I'll name and shame them too :)David Carterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12446185549515040966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5852239505901018331.post-24055093772117255032008-02-22T17:59:00.000Z2008-02-22T17:59:00.000ZDavid,<BR/><BR/>You make some solid points about the difficulty of open-source development, but, I believe, if you stick to it that you'll come up with a scale-able model that works well the next time around (and work with developers who use agile/lean dev methods.) Currently, we're developing a network using 100% open-source technologies and have developed processes that make the task easier each time.Bradleyrivad.comnoreply@blogger.com