Roger Bolton gets his facts mixed up constantly. T...

2008-10-15T04:42:00.000+01:00

Roger Bolton gets his facts mixed up constantly. Taking his report about Mark 1:41 as an example: in the radio report, he said that the incident in which Jesus is said to be angry in Codex Sinaiticus involves a blind man. One fact after another is mauled and misrepresented throughout Mr. Bolton's reports. The BBC should apologize and Mr. Bolton should be fined for imitating a journalist.
--------------------------------

jnny

internetmarketing

I've read, and I've listened, and I am wondering i...

2008-10-13T09:26:00.000+01:00

I've read, and I've listened, and I am wondering if it is possible to sue the BBC for journalistic malpractice. What sort of clumsy, false, anti-accurate kind of reporting is this?

Roger Bolton gets his facts mixed up constantly! Taking his report about Mark 1:41 as an example: in the radio report, he said that the incident in which Jesus is said to be angry in Codex Sinaiticus involves a blind man. No, it's a *leper.* Mr. Bolton's fact-checking did not even extend to picking up the New Testament. Maybe he doesn't have one. But the real error here is that the whole deal about Mark 1:41 is a complete miscitation, because Codex Sinaiticus does not have the "angry Jesus" variant; the only early Greek manuscript that has "orgisqeis" (angry) in Mark 1:41 is the heavily-influenced-by-the-Diatessaron Codex Bezae.

And the inaccuracies just keep raining down as fast as Mr. Bolton can find the words to express them! One fact after another is mauled and misrepresented throughout Mr. Bolton's reports. The BBC should apologize and Mr. Bolton should be fined for imitating a journalist.

Yours in Christ,

James Snapp, Jr.

Comments on NT Blog: The Oldest Bible

Roger Bolton gets his facts mixed up constantly. T...

I've read, and I've listened, and I am wondering i...