tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post3363852147194106049..comments2007-12-17T14:12:30.568ZComments on NT Blog: No Other Gospel - Nick PerrinMark Goodacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-38419911606470929142007-12-17T14:12:00.000Z2007-12-17T14:12:00.000ZNo, but the idea that they were based on eyewitnes...No, but the idea that they were based on eyewitness testimony (e.g. Mark on Peter's) is an ancient idea.Edhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05188482189638751204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-49411090991943374462007-12-17T02:26:00.000Z2007-12-17T02:26:00.000ZMark and Luke were never thought of as eyewitnesse...Mark and Luke were never thought of as eyewitnesses.Stephen C. Carlsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18239379955876245197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-5044415762461804572007-12-17T01:00:00.000Z2007-12-17T01:00:00.000ZThanks, EMC. In context I am talking about the re...Thanks, EMC. In context I am talking about the recent scholarly literature, but I see that it could be taken another way, so I will do a slight reword as you suggest. Cheers, Mark. PS: Looking forward to the fourth annual Ralphies!Mark Goodacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05115370166754797529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5759844.post-25244592343700109102007-12-17T00:54:00.000Z2007-12-17T00:54:00.000ZThe idea that the 4 gospels are based on eyewitnes...The idea that the 4 gospels are based on eyewitness testimony is hardly a new claim, even if it is controversial. You might wish to rephrase that sentence.EMChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02505525490002421093noreply@blogger.com