tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5669838.post115871433141860186..comments2009-07-14T13:46:04.721-05:00Byranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02904365789033352077noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5669838.post-1158971538871886692006-09-22T19:32:00.000-05:002006-09-22T19:32:00.000-05:00Myron, I think it needs to be obvious to someone with basic knowledge in the discipline. However, authors skip steps all the time in proofs, assuming students can or will fill in the gaps. That's what, in my experience, makes reading certain textbooks difficult.Byranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02904365789033352077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5669838.post-1158897328414491322006-09-21T22:55:00.000-05:002006-09-21T22:55:00.000-05:00so man you must get the lastest edition of sports illustrated. the one with a-rod on the cover. on about the 8th page or so is a pic of the ducks blocking the oklahoma field goal, but as i was looking closer at the picture i noticed in the crowd a redhead. there he is man in sports illustrated! our little bro justin, and dad. i about accidented myself. its rather suprising looking in a magazine and seeing your brother. anyway check it out. i'll call you tomma. <BR/>randeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5669838.post-1158891824690414662006-09-21T21:23:00.000-05:002006-09-21T21:23:00.000-05:00To be obvious, does the statement have to appear obvious to a reasonably informed person, or need it only be obvious to a student of whatever discipline is being argued?<BR/><BR/>Reasonably informed person comes from my auditing class, btw. Thought I would add that for good measure.Myronnoreply@blogger.com