tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post8695940417319321643..comments2008-11-10T09:01:24.175-05:00Comments on Search and Destroy: THIS WEEK'S SYNDICATED COLUMN: No We Didn'tTed Rallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15206037144515105918noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-41273166202869628682008-11-09T17:04:00.000-05:002008-11-09T17:04:00.000-05:00Maura, Unless Obama has a very powerful secret cab...Maura, Unless Obama has a very powerful secret cabal of influential insiders hell-bent on changing things beyond recognition for generations, his legacy will be erased by the next Bush.<BR/><BR/>If Obama and his team do not already have proxies to carry out delegitimization hits on conservative commentators, he is toast.<BR/><BR/>Finally, I ask you:<BR/><BR/>What happened when Janet Jackson flashed the cameras on national TV?<BR/><BR/><BR/>The stations that showed the footage were fined punitively, and in all subsequent broadcasts of that footage, the boob was blocked out. We need to treat lies like boobs.<BR/>If Obama has not already begun the process of censoring lies the same way we censor boobs, he is one.Angelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06412789587317769889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-54302047207069824932008-11-09T10:25:00.000-05:002008-11-09T10:25:00.000-05:00For those who don't know Hawaii or don't think muc...<I>For those who don't know Hawaii or don't think much about it, it "reads" like no racism at all.</I><BR/><BR/>Actually, some parts of Hawaii (like the rural Big Island) are festering with racism; the tension is barely contained. But it's a different dynamic: the whites ("the haoles") hate the native peoples and vice-versa. The black population is very small, and black/white economic tension is non-existent--hence little black/white racism.Grouchyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06387397923686488949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-13305151194301264112008-11-09T02:41:00.000-05:002008-11-09T02:41:00.000-05:00Ted, you are one of the few people I've seen who h...Ted, you are one of the few people I've seen who has noted the importance of Obama's white up-bringing in making him acceptable to white voters. His birth culture is white American, not black American. Black American culture naturally includes an element of hostility to whites. How could it not? Obama knows black culture deeply and fluently, but it's not his birth culture; he can put it completely aside and exude a comforting, non-threatening, mainstream whiteness which sets off no alarms of unconscious racism. Obama is a black man who doesn't always "feel" black.<BR/><BR/>I also think it makes a difference that he was raised in Hawaii, where the dynamics of racism are not the same as those of the mainland. For those who don't know Hawaii or don't think much about it, it "reads" like no racism at all. Obama's unusual background makes him much more acceptable to whites than scary Al Sharpton who can't help pushing the racist buttons of even the most progressive white folks. <BR/><BR/>I don't see how recognizing Obama's unique racial and cultural background is in any way insulting to him-- not to the black part of him or to the white part of him. His black heritage, his white family, his up-bringing in Hawaii and Indonesia, his Ivy League education, his young manhood in the black neighborhoods of Chicago-- all of these things go into making Obama Obama. Claiming one aspect of Obama's life as a source of pride and another as an insult seems foolish to me. Looking at it in hindsight, it makes perfect sense that America's first black president is so atypical. He could hardly be anything else.<BR/><BR/>Jana C.H.<BR/>Seattle<BR/>Saith Will Cuppy: In America everybody's conscience is unusually free. If it isn't, we fix it. We're funny that way.Jana C.H.http://www.blogger.com/profile/16974426405568302762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-36788647227286994902008-11-09T00:24:00.000-05:002008-11-09T00:24:00.000-05:00I was just telling a friend that I'm still afraid ...<I>I was just telling a friend that I'm still afraid to leave our little liberal bubble--49% of the state is still functionally retarded, and rabidly “clinging to their guns and religion”...</I><BR/><BR/>Grouchy, when we moved here from PA eight years ago, we were told we don't actually live in the south. We live in The Triangle.<BR/>I was in the mountains, close to Boone, a few weeks ago. I don't think I saw one Obama sign, but there were lots of McCain signs. Go even 30 miles outside of Durham, and it's an entirely different state.<BR/><BR/>Angelo, we did have a real candidate. That real candidate won. And I'm really happy about that. At any rate, my point was about Ted's voting for Obama as a sign of solidarity, and that his use of the word "hysterical" contradicted that solidarity. Solidarity being just a consolation prize (which, by the way, it's not) has nothing to do with my point. I don't need a consolation prize anyway.Maurahttp://occasionalblond.vox.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-74137802339039226742008-11-08T09:59:00.000-05:002008-11-08T09:59:00.000-05:00I have to agree with you Ted, as I generally do. T...I have to agree with you Ted, as I generally do. The &#39;Military Industrial Complex®&#39; has put a black sock on it&#39;s left hand and let it beat down the now much despised right hand. Great Punch &amp; Judy drama, but the hands in the socks are still in charge. <BR/>Angelo mentioned the Space Race- &quot;We wanted to go to the moon for no reason at all.&quot; There was a reason. The Rand Corporation advised Kennedy that if he wanted to end war he&#39;d have to find another way to keep feeding the military contractors, and the people&#39;s lust for Patriotism. Too bad that one didn&#39;t play. <BR/>I will disagree with you on one point, though, I don&#39;t believe that Bush ever had 90% approval. It&#39;s just that at that moment 90% of the people were afraid to say anything remotely disapproving of the good ol&#39; U.S. of A. for fear of lynch mobs. I know I was.Richardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02270952489685717948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-83552054994636095832008-11-08T01:25:00.000-05:002008-11-08T01:25:00.000-05:00this isn't a historic moment? That's a total diss ...<I><BR/>this isn't a historic moment? That's a total diss to the African-Americans you claimed you were standing beside<BR/></I><BR/><BR/>The solidarity vote motif is just a consolation prize to people who could not get a real candidate. If a true liberal were running against Obama, Ted would not have voted for Obama.<BR/><BR/>and, no, Obama is not liberal.Angelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06412789587317769889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-25476485998649775772008-11-07T23:35:00.000-05:002008-11-07T23:35:00.000-05:00I was with most of what you had to say until this:...I was with most of what you had to say until this:<BR/><BR/>"Barack Obama, after all, is only half-black, and not even half-African- American at that. Jeremiah Wright aside, Obama had a white upbringing. A product of the elite, he went to an Ivy League college (the same as mine, at the same time). If we were looking at President-Elect Sharpton, I'd believe in this change."<BR/><BR/>I think it's really, really disgusting how so many so-called progressives are challenging Obama's "blackness." What does it mean to say someone is, "after all," only half black? I don't think privileged, Ivy League-educated white people have a lock-down on "whiteness" -- why should we believe that only Al Sharpton and Jeremiah Wright get to be authentically black?<BR/><BR/>That kind of racial politics belongs to the 60s. We live in a diverse age, in a diverse country, with all kinds of black people, all kinds of white people, and all kinds of brown people.<BR/><BR/>While it's certainly true that electing Obama doesn't mean America's gotten over its prejudices -- the stereotype that Sharpton embodies for so many bigots will continue to be just that, a stereotype for bigots -- but there is a right way to say this, and a wrong way to say this. Challenging someone's blackness (or whiteness or brown-ness) is *definitely the wrong way.*Whitneyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01064261761562860891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-45957613227592404362008-11-07T23:21:00.000-05:002008-11-07T23:21:00.000-05:00People are making such a fuss about NC going blue....<I>People are making such a fuss about NC going blue. Please.</I><BR/><BR/>Hi Maura. I'm here in Durham too--the bluest district in the state (76% for 'Bama). I tend to agree. I was just telling a friend that I'm still afraid to leave our little liberal bubble--49% of the state is still functionally retarded, and rabidly “clinging to their guns and religion”...Grouchyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06387397923686488949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-41731398192311735072008-11-07T23:18:00.000-05:002008-11-07T23:18:00.000-05:00IncitatusMany Cuban exiles are mad at Bush because...Incitatus<BR/><BR/>Many Cuban exiles are mad at Bush because he limited the amount of money that they could send home to relatives in Cuba. And the amount of time they could spend visiting relatives in Cuba (or I believe so). So yes, they're fed up with Bush.Susan Starkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05502924049761676587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-2464398836062276962008-11-07T18:50:00.000-05:002008-11-07T18:50:00.000-05:00Susan,Many Cuban exiles, and their children and gr...Susan,<BR/><BR/>Many Cuban exiles, and their <B>children</B> and <B>grandchildren</B>, might have voted for Obama, even though they still and <B>justifiably so</B> hate El Comandante, because they're just as fed up of Bush II as the rest of America. Imagine that. <BR/>After all, the Jewish retirees did vote for Obama, right?Incitatushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07755304957861054440noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-39130654498193802592008-11-07T12:14:00.000-05:002008-11-07T12:14:00.000-05:00If the Republicans had picked a better candidate, ...<I>If the Republicans had picked a better candidate, they would have won. If Obama had presented a truly distinct alternative to conservatism—socialized healthcare, say, or opposing both stupid wars rather than the least popular stupid one—he would have lost. Conservatism? Dead? Not a chance.</I><BR/><BR/>You're absolutely right, Ted. People are making such a fuss about NC going blue. Please. Obama took it by about 13,000 votes. It's better than not taking it, for sure, but I'm not fooling myself that the rednecks in the hinterlands (and the not so hinterlands of Durham, where I live. It might be a hotbed of lesbian, tree-hugging, rabble-rousing community organizers, but it still has plenty of racists, too) have had a big change of heart.<BR/><BR/>However, you're not only being a big, old spoilsport, you're being disingenuous. "Hysterical", not "Historical"? Come on, Ted. You're the one who said you were voting for Obama because you wanted black people to know you stood beside them? That's what all this supposed "hysteria" is about. Can you honestly say that this isn't a historic moment? That's a total diss to the African-Americans you claimed you were standing beside, and to a lesser degree towards those of us who are whiter than the Queen and are excited and moved by what happened on Tuesday night.<BR/><BR/>Being excited that the next POTUS is a man who might actually remember what it was like to grow up without privilege (unlike Reagan) doesn't make me hysterical. I don't think anyone believes Obama is going to usher in a Utopian era. That doesn't mean he's not going to do some good for the country.Maurahttp://occasionalblond.vox.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-46947451370390487772008-11-07T11:01:00.000-05:002008-11-07T11:01:00.000-05:00To hear the noise coming out of American media and...To hear the noise coming out of American media and weblogs, one would think that the very act of electing Obama was the end unto itself and that all the problems are behind us now. <BR/><BR/>Now the wars will end, the economy is going to automatically get better and, best of all, the entire world has to start respecting America again. Once again, Mr. Rall injects some perspective.<BR/><BR/>Gotta love that guy telling Ted to get "real" and this is all so very "HUGE". No. If Obama manages to achieve HALF of what is expected of him; if he manages to fix HALF of what's currently destroying America from within, that would be HUGE. But don't hold your breath. <BR/><BR/>Ms. Stark almost seems to say it, but then veers away. Yes, the Republicans stole the 2000 and 2004 elections and the fact is, if they had wanted to win this time around they would have stolen this election too. Period. The fact is they didn't want to win this election. Even rats know when to desert a sinking ship. <BR/><BR/>More than any nebulous "bubble mentality", this is the reason they put forth so many inept candidates(not the least inept being the POTUS and VP candidates themselves). Don't believe for a moment this was a mistake.<BR/><BR/>They have spent the past eight years filling the bank accounts of the upper 1% with public money to the detriment of an entire nation. Now it can no longer be denied and it has come time to pay the huge tab. Guess who they hand that off to?<BR/><BR/>Yes Ms Stark. It is indeed time for the Democrats to take the blame and they are willingly stepping up to do just that. Worse they are high-fiving each other all the way while they do it.Flamingo Bobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-42174282347577912532008-11-07T10:50:00.000-05:002008-11-07T10:50:00.000-05:00By any measure this is a fucking landslide for Dem...<I>By any measure this is a fucking landslide for Democrats and a repudiation of failed conservatism.</I><BR/><BR/>you are dreaming. Voters do not know what conservatism is or what liberalism is, or what anything is. So they cannot repudiate anything. <BR/><BR/>They voted out the last party because things got just a little too sucky, and the Dem's candidate was not a joke. Admit it: <BR/>A terrorist attack three months ago, would have changed everything.Angelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06412789587317769889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-69424480728862069962008-11-07T09:10:00.000-05:002008-11-07T09:10:00.000-05:00Aside from the six percentage (not 3, as was point...Aside from the six percentage (not 3, as was pointed out by an anonymous poster above) difference, some seriously red states went swing or blue. Indiana, North Carolina, Virginia. Missouri is still up in the air. Montana was fairly close. And let's not forget the senate and house gains for the democrats. Shit, in South Dakota and Montana (same with Arkansas, but the Dem was running against a Green), they voted a Democrat in by wide margins. This is a clear repudiation of Bush politics. Yes, there are 46% of the electorate who seem to be slow learners. But I wouldn't write this off.<BR/><BR/>Of course Obama won't change everything in his first term. He'll probably just minimize the damage. I agree that Afghanistan is misguided and wrong, and I hope Obama learns that. Given that he actually has a curiosity about the world, it's a possibility.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-61500857439980260222008-11-07T00:19:00.000-05:002008-11-07T00:19:00.000-05:00Hi Susan,I'd like to add to your comment a few poi...Hi Susan,<BR/><BR/>I'd like to add to your comment a few points.<BR/><BR/>"The bubble-reality shrunk considerably with Katrina, the occupation of Iraq, the economy, etc."<BR/><BR/>Terrorism and wars that are "over there" are bogeymen that are only experienced and lived by the people directly affected by them. People who lived in New York or had family in the planes or World Trade Center that day. The Iraq war is being fought by our military and their families, the rest of us were told to go shopping.<BR/><BR/>What sunk the neo-cons, as you pointed out, was Katrina and the economic meltdown. Katrina started it, but still didn't actually affect the majority of Americans. The economic meltdown is not a bogeyman, it is very real and in our faces. You can't spin a stock market losing 40% of its value.<BR/><BR/>John McCain wasn't a bad candidate, he simply had to adhere to a party platform that systemically can't address the problem, and people know that.<BR/><BR/>Any GOP nominee would have had to sign off on the party platform and any one of them would have been doomed for it.Aggie Dudehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11520287489087599710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-71884095074341210112008-11-06T23:07:00.000-05:002008-11-06T23:07:00.000-05:00Ted, you are contradicting yourself from your past...Ted, you are contradicting yourself from your past articles in this one very crucial manner:<BR/><BR/>The Bush regime STOLE the election in 2000, and STOLE it again in 2004. Why are those of us to the left of the center so quick to forget that? I would think, Ted, with your association with Greg Palast, this would not be too hard for you to remember. So how do you know that the votes that appeared to go to McCain actually went to McCain? <BR/><BR/>McCain might have stole the 2008 election, too, if he had carried Virginia and Florida. Jesus, I don't think the Republicans saw that coming, did they? The rednecks and the Cuban exiles didn't pull through this time. They either stayed home or voted for Obama. Imagine that.<BR/><BR/>The thing is, the neo-conservatives had constructed this Orwellian bubble-reality that was separate from the true reality that everyone else was experiencing. And they got away with it for a while because of 9/11, and a compliant media that was itself intoxicated with the bubble-reality's promise of wiping out inconvenient people by stripping away their power to be heard.<BR/><BR/>The bubble-reality shrunk considerably with Katrina, the occupation of Iraq, the economy, etc., but not enough for the Republicans to choose a wise and savvy candidate. In other words, the neo-conservatives' philosophy of reality-creation led them inevitably to pick in their primaries an inept candidate. It wasn't possible for them to do otherwise, Ted, with them living in the bubble-reality they created for themselves.<BR/><BR/>Not that they learned their lesson. Not at all. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are still cranking out the hot air, even after the election, keeping that bubble-reality blown up. But it's only going to dig their graves faster, the more they stay in the bubble.<BR/><BR/>And as for Obama, Ted, he may be conservative and imperialist, but he will not be able to go on Empire-building adventures like Bush, or even Clinton. The economy is fucked, and if he doesn't work to fix it starting very soon after taking office, everyone will blame him--the black guy--and not Bush, even though Bush was responsible.Susan Starkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05502924049761676587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-3745524782955171682008-11-06T21:41:00.000-05:002008-11-06T21:41:00.000-05:00Today, I accidentally overheard George W. Bush sug...Today, I accidentally overheard George W. Bush suggest that his hair is grayer, I assume, due to the stresses of his job. Could Bush be any worse a liar than he has already demonstrated? <BR/>George W. Bush, speaking to his hairdresser: "Forget the highlights, Sweetie. I need to look like I've been working and worrying for my public."<BR/> I feel like Billy Jack in the Ice Cream Parlor: "You know, I try. I really do. I try to control my anger and violence like Dolores and the kids at the school asked me to. But when I see and hear George W. Bush, I.....go......BERSERK!" Perhaps (p)Resident Bush's ratings with the public will dip to ZERO before he escapes from the scene of his crimes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-63393929508737503092008-11-06T19:02:00.000-05:002008-11-06T19:02:00.000-05:00to anonymous poster calling this a "Landslide" (of...to anonymous poster calling this a "Landslide" (of electoral votes). you obviously have only watched the last 2 elections. go here to see what a real landslide looks like. Even Bush 41's win was WAAAY more lopsided than Tuesday, and his campaign was considered no great shakes....<BR/><BR/>Let's save the hyperbole for other things, shall we? Watch that you don't overuse the word Awesome while you're at it, too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-32906430978117198592008-11-06T18:45:00.000-05:002008-11-06T18:45:00.000-05:00Well, that was certainly a downer. While I am ecst...Well, that was certainly a downer. While I am ecstatic with the Obama victory, I am concerned about the points you raised. How does this jibe with "Wake Up, You're Liberal"?Tonyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18069262697705965100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-80455216787453858102008-11-06T17:29:00.000-05:002008-11-06T17:29:00.000-05:00Kate,Babefish is so 90s. Google is much better at ...Kate,<BR/><BR/>Babefish is so 90s. Google is much better at online translation, even thouh it too sucks. What Le Monde's headline was asking, in plain English, was: "Will Obama be up to the job"?<BR/><BR/>I don't think even the NY Post might get away with that.Incitatushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07755304957861054440noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-84590481330253482332008-11-06T16:41:00.000-05:002008-11-06T16:41:00.000-05:00one more thing. No has been more safe and boring ...one more thing. No has been more safe and boring than Obama.<BR/><BR/>"they can have a seat at the table, but they can't buy <I>every</I> seat."<BR/><BR/>Woa, hold on there Lenin...<BR/><BR/>so yeah, when he gets called socialist makes it come out of me at both ends.Angelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06412789587317769889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-19772032212103078632008-11-06T16:39:00.000-05:002008-11-06T16:39:00.000-05:00Obama is already getting us to lower our expectati...Obama is already getting us to lower our expectations. "we may not get there in one term".<BR/><BR/>Ok, you are right, but you need to say we will have X, Y and Z by date T.<BR/><BR/>We wanted to go to the moon for no reason at all. It bugs me to no end that it is off limits to compare that to attaining euro style healthcare.Angelohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06412789587317769889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-11000608400658232932008-11-06T03:19:00.000-05:002008-11-06T03:19:00.000-05:00Hey, me again. :-) Lotsa folks will consider you...Hey, me again. :-) Lotsa folks will consider you an old killjoy, as usual, but no matter what, you say what needs to be heard. Thanks for doing your part to keep our feet on the ground (dancing in the streets or otherwise).<BR/><BR/>Michael Moore (he's not going away, folks, get used to it) said it best, that we really needed a blowout, an absolute one-sided annihilation, to completely and irrevocably refute Bush policy for all time. Obama got a decisive win, but not a blowout, which means that he's going to have to fight to get our troops out of the nightmare that is Iraq, end torture, end warrantless wiretapping, increase taxes on the obscenely wealthy (which really just reverses the never-ending cuts they've received under Republican administration), and other critical things that by right should be slam dunks.<BR/><BR/>So what we're left with is optimism, relief, the future looking brighter (sheesh, how could it <I>not</I>), but at the same time more than a little trepidation that our man might not be able to do what absolutely needs to be done, or else will be simply overwhelmed by the ungodly mess he's taken control of. Sure, he could surprise me. But at this point, it would definitely <I>be</I> a surprise.<BR/><BR/>Here's hoping, something we haven't been able to do for too long.DKWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-16379977262211404882008-11-06T00:49:00.000-05:002008-11-06T00:49:00.000-05:00Ditto. Ted, what about the renters?Ditto. Ted, what about the renters?Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14564306648081639607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5288939.post-81622368664299071852008-11-05T23:56:00.000-05:002008-11-05T23:56:00.000-05:00Ted,Not all the Bush voters supported McCain. In m...Ted,<BR/>Not all the Bush voters supported McCain. In my precinct, McCain got 36 votes fewer than Bush, while Obama got 107 more than Kerry. There were under 100 more voters than in 2004. I'm sure Obama got a small number of Bush's 2004 voters. In addition, other Bush 2004 voters may have voted for Barr or Baldwin. (While Baldwin is definitely Religious Right- more so than Bush(!)- his Iraq War view is short and simple: "Unconstitutional, Ungodly and Wrong.")orvillethirdhttp://openid.aol.com/orvillethirdnoreply@blogger.com