A Message from Elder George

ETHICS, MORALS, & STUFF LIKE THAT

2009-07-03T04:13:00.000-07:00

The June 29, 2009 issue of Newsweek contained a cover story by Fareed Zakaria titled The Communist Manifesto, which he subtitled Greed is Good (to a point). An excerpt from the article states “What we are experiencing is not a crisis of capitalism, it is a crisis of finance, of democracy, of globalization and ultimately of ethics.” To lump ethics into the same pot as finance, democracy, and globalization indicates that he does not know where ethics come from. Furthermore, for a proponent of “greed is good” to express a concern for a crisis of ethics indicates a lack of understanding of ethics.

A quality that derives from ethics called trust received attention from Burt Ross former mayor of Ft. Lee, NJ. He spoke at the Bernie Madoff sentencing hearing where he pointed out that the major effect of the financial fraud was the destruction of the public “trust.”

On the same weekend that I read Zakaria’s column and saw Burt Ross on a news interview, I also saw on Meet the Press a concern expressed for the “values” of this nation.

These three unseen and conceptual factors: ethics, trust, and values received the attention of the major media within a span of a few days, which indicates the growing concern of the citizenry about non-material matters. Values and trust derive form ethics, a quality not understood by the media, its authors, interviewers, and producers.

That ethics should be brought up in a national news magazine by non-other than Fareed Zakaria, is a travesty. If Fareed writes an article without mentioning GDP it becomes a collectors item; he is so enmeshed in the gross materialistic values of Western thought that he has become blind to the source and meaning of ethics. The making of money as an end in itself can never be ethical because it is an activity based on greed, which is unethical and self-destructive.

Men who devote themselves to the propagation and preservation of the species establish ethics. There is no place else for ethics to come from. Western thought—which worships the material world and developed a genderless society—is devoid of ethics. It has no sense of right and wrong. It attempts to make up for its ignorance of matters spiritual by developing laws for its societal conduct. Legal and illegal have replaced right and wrong leaving society without any meaning on which to base its behavioral conduct. Solomon said a nation without vision shall perish; we are that nation and we are perishing.

A report on the internet also this past weekend indicated that a growing proportion of our youth feel that they will not live long. Research has shown that youth who do not believe they will live long are seven times more prone to contact AIDS and other illnesses, use drugs, and become involved in negative issues than youth who have a longer life expectancy. Our youth have no purpose; they are perishing.

The race is perishing. The source of values, leadership and virility has been removed from society. In its place there is a constant barrage of anti family propaganda being promulgated to the public such as Sandra Tsing Loh’s article appearing in The Atlantic describing the end of her marriage. Titled Is It Time to End Marriage? Sandra not only has no inhibition about sharing her infidelity with the whole world, but also challenges the institution of marriage itself.

No society has ever survived the loss of male authority and its virility. One would think that Western man would have learned from the fall of Greece, Rome, Spain, and France, but he remains as ignorant of the cause as ever. He hopes that somehow the law will set things right even though the laws of Draco, Solon, Justinian, Napoleon, and the Constitution have failed to do so. He so desperately wants to find some legal precedent that if adhered to will make things all right again, or that failing, perhaps an aspect of his religion that if properly implemented will change things for the better. There aren’t any laws or institutions that will make things better. Only men can make things betters

Men make families. They also develop the ethics necessary to hold them together. The law is an ineffective substitute for manhood just as money is an ineffective substitute for fatherhood.

It’s time for men to assert themselves, re-establish the family and reinstitute the ethics necessary to maintain it. There are no other options for positive change.

E.G.

FATHERHOOD IS NOT A JOB DESCRIPTION

2009-06-26T03:38:00.000-07:00

Fathers received attention this week as a result of President Obama’s message appearing in Parade on Father’s Day entitled “We Need Fathers to Step Up.” There was also some media attention given to the letter he wrote to his daughters two days before his inauguration. Whether they were his words or those of his writers they conveyed the impression that he is pro-family and understanding of the responsibilities of fatherhood.

His message might have had more credence if he had not chosen as his vice-president the sponsor of the Violence Against Women Act, the enforcement of which has resulted in the increased incarceration of men, removal of fathers from their children, and the further breakdown of the American family. It might have had more credence if he did not wax eloquent calling it a “wonderful day” at the signing of his first piece of legislation, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Play Act of 2009.

If you question what these two pieces of legislation have to do in addressing the issue of fatherhood, they were both designed to usurp the authority of men.

Regarding the Lilly Ledbetter Act, its focus was on equal pay for women. I am a former owner of a small manufacturing business and during the 23 years that I ran it I paid people according to the contribution made to the company. I paid them fairly, a policy that at least partially accounts for never having been approached to unionize. I made the decision as to what constituted fair pay, not some bureaucrat in Washington, the state legislature, or city administration. Since the enactment of the Lilly Ledbetter Act the judge of fair pay will come from a source outside of the business owner and will further erode the authority of men to conduct business according to their own judgment and ethics.

A fundamental of all organizational operation requires that authority be given to those with responsibility. The president has a cabinet and every member in it has the authority to run his department as he sees fit as they strive to attain the goals set by the president. There is no organizational structure that can long endure without giving those with responsibility the authority to do what is necessary to fulfill that responsibility.

Put another way, every organization has its head, whether a business structure or societal grouping. Every corporation has a president and every herd has its buck. There can only be one leader and that leader must have authority.

The government has destroyed the family structure by usurping the authority of the male; therefore, it no longer refers to the family in domestic relations but instead speaks of fatherhood and motherhood, reducing both activities to job descriptions prepared by the government. In keeping with the ever-growing emphasis on a genderless society, motherhood and fatherhood are being increasingly referred to as parenthood.

Fatherhood is not a job description; it is a function of developed manhood. The process of fatherhood begins with the development of men—real men—who understand that their primary function in life consists of providing the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture it.

When a real man decides to start a family he seeks a woman who has what he considers the desirable attributes to be the mother of his children. When he finds her and she in turn decides he has the attributes that will provide the environment and means that will enable her to nurture a family, they agree to mate. This mating agreement is formalized to the community in a ritual known as the rite of marriage, in which the man and woman are making a commitment to the community to bring forth life and raise it to the best of their ability. After this ritual they become known as husband and wife.

As husband and wife they begin preparing the nest in which they will raise their offspring. This nest or home will vary according to the social mores and customs of the husband and wife, and their particular economic strength. After the first child is born, they will become known as mothers and fathers. The progression of fatherhood is from man, to husband, to father. Real men make good husbands, and good husbands make devoted fathers.

This progression applies to women as well. A good woman makes a good wife makes a good mother. To think that it is possible to be a good mother without providing the child an environment containing a good father represents fallacious thinking at best. 90% to 95% of our prisoners come from homes in which there were no fathers.

Government has removed all male authority; consequently there can be no family. There will eventually be no free enterprise either. The elimination of family has left society without a cohesive bond. Government attempts to administrate the relationship between men and women, mothers and fathers, and parents has resulted in a national angst caused by a lack of belongingness. Fatherhood in that arrangement becomes a job description such as carpenter or stockbroker. It becomes devoid of any obligation towards the propagation and preservation of the species including its spiritual development. Government has no spirituality; nor does it possess any ethics. It has replaced moral and immoral with legal and illegal. It is this thinking that enables President Obama to take a pro-abortion stance while publicly proclaiming support for fathers. He does not see any tie in with abortion-on-demand and the usurpation of male authority.

Only men make families. Only men make any organization. The disempowering of males leads to the collapse of society. Women cannot be empowered vis-à-vis men any more than the earth can be empowered vis-à-vis the Sun. The Sun can be disempowered, that is, its energy can be diminished, it can lose its pull of gravity, and eventually as it becomes more like the earth the Solar system will fall apart. The earth on the other hand, cannot in any way become more like the Sun. So too in the relationship between men and women, men can be castrated, neutered, and emasculated, but the woman can never become empowered. A sex change will never occur in which the new male can be empowered with virility.

What this society calls the empowerment of women is the disempowerment of men by law and the usurpation of this power by the government reducing men and women to automaton workers and programmed consumers.

Having reduced fatherhood to a job description our children will continue to do poorly in schools, teen pregnancies will remain the norm, ADD will increase among our youth, the rate of marriage will decrease, and the rate of divorce will increase. These conditions do not bode well for women since 10% of them already suffer from debilitating depression in America, as do 15% of European women.

Until such time as men retake their authority and re-establish themselves as head of the family government will continue to extend its tentacles into every facet of society reducing it to a huge ward of the government.

Fatherhood is not a job description. Don’t accept it as such.

COLBERT’S NEWSWEEK SATIRE

2009-06-14T19:15:00.000-07:00

Comedian Stephen Colbert guest edited the June 16, 2009 issue of Newsweek, and except for two introductory pages and a few obvious satirical comments, the issue seriously addressed the issues facing the nation and the world. Or so it seemed, and that was the satire.

Top-notch writers and media personalities such as Jonathan Alter, Dahlia Lithwick, Sharon Begley, and Newsweek’s Asian honkie Fareed Zakaria commented respectively upon education, the domestic prison issue (a true rarity in mainstream media), health care, and the war in Iraq. I felt that all these articles supported the satire and parody that represent the core of Colbert’s comedy.

These writers of national if not international fame, addressed effects and not causes, an activity that represents great philosophical and metaphysical satire. They actually believe that effects can be changed by a reorganization of material activities.

Jonathan Alter indicates in his article that president Obama and his educational team understand that the key to fixing education is better teaching, and the key to better teaching is figuring out who can teach and who can’t. That statement comes from gross ignorance and the satire is the belief that this ignorance can correct an educational problem. When children have fathers at home school dropout rates decline, the rate of unwed motherhood is cut in half and scholastic performance increases. Not once does Jonathan Alter even hint at manhood, fatherhood, or family. Yes, the key to learning is better teaching and that is found in the home, not outside of it. It comes from observing the deductive reasoning and problem solving that parents utilize in maintaining the home. However, a given in all of the Newsweek articles is that family is unnecessary.

Next we have the article by Dahlia Lithwick titled Our Real Prison Problem. I have considered our high prison population the number one issue in America since I wrote my book and first began activities discussing gender and promoting patriarchy. The prison population in America doubled every eight years from 1976 to 2000 going from 250,000 to two million. It leveled off somewhat during the Bush administration reaching 2.4 million in 2008. Ms Lithwick’s article pointed out that the United States has 5% of the world’s population and close to 25% of its prisoners. She could have added that 90% to 95 % of the prison population comes from broken homes, and 95% percent of street gang membership comes from broken homes. Every night 24 million American children go to sleep in a home without a father in it. The prison population has climbed for 35 years; no solution is in sight because family is taken off the table of discussable items when addressing this issue. The satire and parody of articles written by persons of acclaim in news magazines in particular and the media in general are that they ignore fundamental causes and consequently can never reach solutions to issues.

Sharon Begley’s article in which she addresses the administrative delay in bringing new “cures” to the market is another case in point. Scientists do not invent or develop “cures” to anything. All medications developed by the pharmaceutical industry treat symptoms not causes, which is a major reason the industry has grown so rapidly. A major growth in the pharmaceutical industry is in the production of drugs to treat depression and attention deficit syndrome. One million school children are now administered Ritalin, and the number of people taking anti-depressants numbers in the tens of millions. Those children who come from broken and dysfunctional homes are the primary users of medicinal drugs, and single, and divorced women account for the preponderant use of anti-depressants. The breakdown of family leads to the breakdown of society, but this concept cannot be readily understood by the feminine materialistic thinking of Western thought and hence did not receive Sharon Begley’s mention.

Lastly we come to Zakaria’s article titled Victory in Iraq in which he states the following: “Most observers—especially many in the U.S. military with whom I have spoken—believe that the cardinal errors of the occupation of Iraq were to disband the Iraqi Army, de-Baathify the country and shut down all state owned enterprises. In doing this America engineered not simply regime change but the total dismantling of the state and a massive social revolution as well, all in the space of two months.” Why doesn’t Fareed Zakaria—who has absorbed Western thought down to the marrow in his bones, and can’t write an article without referring to productivity and employment—understand that those activities were not in error, that they were planned to destroy the family structure and cultural practices of the Iraqi people? This destruction has succeeded. Part of the plan for a New World Order is to destroy the patriarchal structure of the Islamic world. That plan has succeeded in Iraq, and a contingent of U.S. soldiers will remain in Iraq to be sure that they do not revert to their previous culture, just as American soldiers are still in Japan 65 years after hostilities ended to be sure that they do not revert to their previous culture. The destruction of the family remains a paramount goal of those who want to establish the New World Order and they are succeeding.

The four articles described above and the other articles contained in Newsweek predicate their pseudo intellectual reasoning on gross materialism, a lack of spirituality, and the destruction of the family. To imply to us that the government is working on a resolution to issues that have been with us for decades is satire and parody. The very belief system that they employ has produced our problems.

The unseen God produced the physical universe and the unseen conceptual thing of men produced the material world that sits upon it. Just as there can be no universe without God, there can be no society without men. By destroying the natural gender balance called patriarchy government with the help of the spiritually myopic media is taking over control of every fundamental aspect of our environment.

To counter this governmental destruction of the natural order of things requires your awareness and your action. My sons and daughters who are reading this essay you can subscribe to my future essays and join with the many who have already done so by clicking on the subscribe button under my picture. It will take you only 60 seconds to do and it will assist in promoting our message significantly. Once you are accustomed to receiving my essays you might get a friend, acquaintance, or co-worker to do likewise. That could lead to investing in my book and booklets, and eventually becoming active with Men’s Action. At the very least you will be contributing to a concentration of thought that will eventually break through the materialistic confines of Western thought and pioneer a return to a natural way of life.

Our message is gathering strength and it will not take much longer—a year at the most—before we begin to make significant inroads into our impotent society. No one can make this change alone; all of us can do it together. I thank you for your interest and look forward to your support.

E.G.

OPEN ADVOCACY OF TORTURE

2009-05-28T05:27:00.000-07:00

As I watched interviews and panel discussions concerning the use of torture and the fate of prisoners at Guantanamo I became increasingly uncomfortable, annoyed, and saddened to see in the American government open advocates of the torture of human beings. These advocates came primarily from the conservative element of the Republican Party that also receives significant support from the “religious right.” These advocates of torture are proud of their religious affiliation and can usually be seen in church on most any Sunday.

I wonder as they worship, pray, and listen to sermons what causes their difficulty in understanding the fundamental tenets of their religion. What part of “Love thy neighbor as thyself,” “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” and “Turn the other check” do they not grasp? Is the meaning of “Love one another as I have loved you” so deep that they cannot comprehend it? Apparently it is and always has been.

The corruption of spiritual truth by Western thought has existed from the beginning as has the torture of those who would not accept its ignorance. From the earliest days of the Christian influence in Egypt, through the Crusades, Middle Ages, and the present time, there have been those who persecute and torture those who think differently than the “enlightened” group in power. The early immigrants to this nation such as the Quakers, Pilgrims, Puritans, Huguenots, Mennonites, Jesuits, and Lutherans were victims of severe persecution in Europe. There are among us today those who would welcome the return of The Inquisition provided of course that they were the inquisitors.

On the other side of the spectrum of political Western thought are the liberals who believe that if the resources of the material world could be redistributed societal happiness would prevail. What part of “Man does not live by bread alone,” “My kingdom is not of this world,” and “What does it suffer a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul” do they not understand? These liberals who rely upon academic learning, material considerations, and governmental power apparently have no grasp of the meaning of the words of Jeremiah “ Let not the wise man boast of his wisdom, nor the valiant of his valor, nor let the rich man boast of his riches.”

However, liberals and conservatives alike unite in their focus on matters material and in their aristocratic attitude towards those who do not see as they do. It was because of this European thinking that prevailed at the time of Jesus that he uttered near the end of his earthly sojourn the words “Forgive them for they know not what they do.” They still don’t and that is why Western society is in its death throes.

Every segment of Western society is in a state of decline and its political activists are scurrying about trying to find something in their institutions that will “fix” the mess that 2,500 years of gross materialistic thinking created. It is not fixable. Nothing will change until the thinking changes. The time has come for Western thought to reflect on the meaning of “Lest a man be born again.” A change in thinking must occur within the individual man, and then he will begin to change society.

Men will begin to make change for the soul has begun to regurgitate the toxicity produced by the diet of gross materialism. The indwelling spirit is rousing man from his somnolence. Real Men of courage will rise up and re-establish the patriarchal structure necessary to sustain human development and spiritual growth. Patriarchy is a spiritual structure wherein men expressing the love of God within them dedicate their lives to the propagation and preservation of human existence. It is a structure that enables women to dedicate their lives to the nurturing of the race. It is a structure in which men and women working in accordance with their unique attributes grow spiritually.

Be ready my sons and daughters, you are witnessing an event that has already begun that will transform society to a degree beyond your wildest imagination. You are witnessing the implosion of a grossly materialistic, aristocratic, and monolithic government that is frantically extending its influence into every facet of our personal lives in order to maintain its control. As we see it tightening its grip by the enactment of onerous laws against the family, increasing the use of surveillance cameras, manipulating the economy to financially disempower ever-larger segments of society, and using the media as a huge propaganda vehicle to justify its actions, it appears that it is approaching complete control of our lives; however, it is decaying from within.

This decay will continue until the whole aberrant structure collapses and makes way for the only natural societal structure of the universe—patriarchy. Such a society loves its fellow man and does not devise ways to torture its brothers and sisters. It doesn’t keep them in prison without a trial either.

AWAKENING TO THE SPIRIT

2009-05-14T04:37:00.000-07:00

This past Mother’s Day I visited the New York Botanical Gardens in the Bronx and from the moment I entered the grounds the sight of the colorful flowers and lush green foliage produced an exhilaration in me that lasted long after I left. I attended a lecture and demonstration given by one of the staff on the care of tulips and in listening to her I realized that she was describing how a segment of the world that God had created functions, and that the entire Botanical Garden was God’s creation in action. Insects, birds, animals, plants, trees, and minute organisms went about their respective tasks of propagating and preserving the species in an interdependent community operating in accordance with universal laws and design.

I compared this activity to life in our modern civilized society with its emphasis on what man has made. Raised in an environment almost devoid of nature (see my essay cubists) and schooled in the works of man, increasing numbers of people have been cut off and insulated from the natural environment they were designed to live in.

The vocational and career training of our children focuses on occupations created in response to the negative effects of our un-natural lifestyle. Social workers deal with the breakdown of the family; occupational therapists deal with job-induced stress; physicians deal with the effects of the pollution of our air, water, and food; and lawyers deal with our inability to relate with each other. An increasing proportion of societal activity focuses on “fixing” the damage wrought by the ignorance of its un-natural lifestyle.

In his book The Holy Science, Sri Yukteswar defines ignorance as the perception of the nonexistent, and the non-perception of the Existent. He goes on to explain that man believes that this material creation is the only thing that substantially exists, there being nothing beyond, forgetting that this material creation is substantially nothing and is a mere play of ideas on the Eternal Spirit, the only Real Substance, beyond the comprehension of the material creation. This ignorance is not only a trouble in itself, but is also the source of all the other troubles of man.

Sri Yukteswar’s comments were in essence an explanation of Jesus’ statement “My Kingdom is not of this world.” At the time of Jesus, the focus on the material world and ignorance of the spiritual world was the source of all troubles, as it is today.

The gross material focus of Western society, especially Anglo-American society is upon material possessions and accomplishments. I had a blogger say to me, “Just look at what we have done,” referring to the accomplishments of Western man. I emphasize the word “look” for the results of Western man’s efforts can be seen. The skyscrapers, airplanes, automobiles, highways, bridges, dams, home appliances and communications equipment serve as visual examples of the results of Western man’s productivity.

The blogger, however, did not “see” our children suffering from a lack of nurturing due to the breakdown of the family; nor did he see the ever-expanding prison population and explosive increase in mental illness. He did not see the utter defilement of the female beginning in grade school where 10 year-old girls participate in sex clubs; continuing to adulthood where streams of women journey to the California, the world’s Mecca of pornography, to serve as interns in X rated films in order to build up resumes necessary to obtain work in big city strip clubs; to the unprecedented rate of unwed motherhood, which spawns juvenile problems and creates stress induced depression upon their mothers. These conditions are not readily seen, but they do exist and evidence the collapse of society caused by its focus on the seen and its ignorance of the unseen.

My pleasure in the Botanical Gardens derived partially from what I saw, but also from what I didn’t see. Looking at the tulip bulbs caused me to reflect on how they produced the offspring that would be the next generation of flowers. I was aware that flowers follow the path of the sun and that trees reach their branches out to it. I realized that the roots of plants and trees unerringly grow towards the source of water and nourishment. Birds always seem to know just where to build their nests and bees know which flowers to pollinate. Unseen forces guide the movement of the entire community of the Botanical Gardens, which provides the environment for the interplay of gender called patriarchy. Everything seen and done at the Botanical Gardens derived from the unseen and its harmony with universal vibrations.

This interplay of the unseen and the seen to produce life and sustain it is not limited to plants, animals and insects, but occurs in greater depth among humans. The indigenous peoples of all continents except Europe based their communal existence on unseen principles. All rites, customs, rituals, traditions, and religious practices derived from their efforts to propagate and preserve the species while it grows spiritually. Their farming, fishing, gathering, and hunting were in harmony with nature and the unseen forces upon which it depended.

Western man calls these societies primitive because they had not exploited their resources to construct material things. These “primitive” societies did not have orphanages, foster care, old-age homes, prisons, and insane asylums. They had no need for social workers, therapists, police, or parole officers, and they didn’t have to take vacations or anti-depressants. They had a high regard for matters spiritual, lived in harmony with nature, and were happy.

The “ME” orientation of Western society focuses on the accumulation of material things and a self-indulgent lifestyle. The American Constitution emphasizes the right to health, wealth, and the pursuit of happiness; there’s nothing in it about the propagation of the species, family, universal love, or spirituality. Freelance writer Wendy Dawn’s article titled Wealth, Wealth and the Pursuit of Happiness that appeared in Associated Content described the growing emphasis on material accumulation in America and the resultant decline in fundamental values.

Published on November 20, 2007 Wendy’s article reflects a growing awareness on the part of Americans that the emphasis on gross materialism is creating negative effects on society and is un-natural. At the time of her article there was little recognition of the cause of this materialistic emphasis, namely the imbalance of gender in Western society. However, I have noticed an increasing awareness of gender issues in the past six months along with an increased realization that men and women are different not only in appearance but in attributes. Eventually people will come to realize that these different attributes were designed for different functions and that a genderless society is an aberration.

This trend is encouraging, especially when I consider that the establishment and all the institutions under its jurisdiction such as education, law, and especially the media has a grossly materialistic focus that it projects to the populace on a continual basis. However, what the establishment does not recognize is the existence of spirit and that it works through all people. This spirit provides the truth that eventually prevails over material ignorance. The spirit that causes plant roots to seek water, flowers to follow the sun, and bees to pollinate is always at work. Adversity tends to motivate us out of our somnolence and get back in touch with the spirit and the harmonious life it produces.

We are at the threshold of great societal change. This decade will witness a return to a more natural way of life and the survival and growth of those who embrace it.

EXPANDING OUR OUTREACH

2009-05-04T05:30:00.000-07:00

The essays I have written under A Message from Elder George address the negative conditions of Western society with an emphasis on their cause and resolution. I will continue to write such essays but at a reduced level, as expanding our outreach collectively and individually requires an increasing amount of attention. This website already contains an abundance of material addressing the adverse conditions under which we live, its cause, and the message of Men’s Action.

Sixty-six of my essays precede this one and can be reached by clicking the last title shown at the bottom of this page, and then the last title on the bottom of the page it brings you to, and so on until the last essay is reached. If you log on to google.com and search for “Elder George – men’s news daily,” you will locate an archive that holds about 125 of my blogs. These blogs together with my essays, home page information, and streaming videos contain approximately 30 hours of continuous viewing and reading for people interested in our message. Anyone logging on to our website for the first time can spend a month exploring it—an activity that I believe would be interesting and rewarding; however, I feel no compulsion to supplement these archives by adding variations to the subject matter they contain. The time has come to advance and address issues that we can control.

The implosion of Western society has accelerated and cannot be reversed. Our activity must focus on what we can do during this implosion to prepare for its aftermath. What kind of society will we establish? Will we continue with the gross materialistic thinking that has caused our present downfall or will we move on to a more natural and enlightened way of thinking? Will we work to fulfill the mission statement of Men’s Action “To foster a natural way of life for humankind?”

Will we recognize that the purpose of human existence is spiritual growth? Spirituality is the recognition that there is more to the human being that the physical body and more to life than the material world. The continuance of this growth requires the propagation and preservation of the species, humankind’s natural activity and highest calling. The natural interplay of gender called patriarchy establishes the family as the focal point of society and makes possible the propagation and preservation of humankind. Men and women are not the same—they are opposites. Our goal is not to compete with each other but to come together and become complete as we work to fulfill the purpose of human existence.

These values are contrary to Western thought, which has made a god of the material world and does not recognize the purpose of existence and the interplay of gender necessary to fulfill that purpose. Here lays our challenge—to live a more natural way of life in the midst of the collapse of a grossly materialistic society.

A portion of my future writing will describe the activities of the men and women who promote our message and recommended lifestyle. It will recognize the man who distributes fliers to his friends and acquaintances as a means of spreading our message. It will recognize those who send our message to local radio and television programs. It will recognize the man who invests in five books and distributes them to his friends and family. It will recognize the first $1,000 donation, which most likely will come from a woman. It will recognize those who promote our message to other websites, who send leads to me, who meet with others in their home to disseminate our message, and who on occasion give me moral support.

Besides this promotional activity we can also put forth effort on living our lives differently. We can change to more natural diets and also prepare more of our own food. We can practice home economics and teach it to others. We can share more of our time, talents, and treasures with others in the development of a more friendly and cohesive community. Most of all we must enlighten and empower men so that they can fulfill their responsibility to women and children by providing the environment and means that will enable women to nurture the race.

There is much to do, and I plan to write more about what needs to be done and those who do it. News of these activities will be published under Men’s Action News rather than under A Message From Elder George. In a few days I will publish an article there about the promotional internet activities of one of our supporters.

Our comatose society has begun to stir. As it awakens it will begin to seek change. Men’s Action will through its active supporters provide the message for that change.

E.G.

DEVASTATION OF WESTERN WOMEN

2009-04-22T06:06:00.000-07:00

Feminists have taken deliberate overt action to destroy the value structure of women in order to motivate married women to leave the home and single women to avoid the institution of marriage altogether.

Removing women from the marriage environment served as the vehicle for fulfilling the ostensible purpose of giving them independence and equity in society, including entry into all organizations that men made. This goal of parity masks a more sinister objective the effects of which have produced devastation among the ranks of women and a deleterious effect on society. The time has come for the unmasking of this sinister objective and then for a return to a naturally functioning society that cares for women and children. However, we first need to determine the reason for the creation of the institution of marriage along with related institutions that have become subject to attack.

The mating ritual of most all life results in the forming of a reproductive structure that supports the propagation and preservation of the species. Among humans that structure has become known as the institution of marriage and it existed long before the enactment of any governmental laws to sanction it.

Women bring life into this world and provide its nurturing through their natural attributes such as adaptability, responsiveness, and visual thinking. They can only fulfill their function in an environment that provides them with safety and security. The highest order of activity for men consists of providing the safety, and security that enables women to bring life into this world and nurture it.

The attributes of constancy, assertiveness, and conceptual thinking enable men to provide the environment conducive to nurturing through the organizations they create and by the ethics they develop. These organizations and their ethical foundations interweave into the development of cultural mores and religious rites that in one way or another relate to the propagation and preservation of humankind.

By removing male authority from the home the institution of marriage has crumbled resulting in high divorce rates, low marriage rates, and an explosive rate in unwed motherhood, which in 1950 hovered between 1% and 2% in America and has now reached close to 40%. The same increases have taken place on the European continent with unwed motherhood near 40% in England and 50% in France. The negative effect on the children of unwed mothers has far reaching consequences such as high drop out rates in school, increased likelihood of a relationship with the law and prisons, and the prospect of their daughters becoming unwed mothers as well. The effect on women of unwed motherhood and the efforts of the government to deal with it such as promoting birth control pills, condom usage, and abortion, has been devastating.

By destroying the institution of marriage women also lost their prestigious positions of good wives and mothers. All through history women who were raised to be good wives and mothers were sought after by men and revered by society. Women dressed and acted in a manner to be attractive to men and men dressed and acted in a manner to be worthy of having such a woman as his wife. Women lived in a “win-win” situation. No man could compete with a good wife and mother.

Women no longer have that prestigious position because they are no longer considered to be women. They have become persons instead. What is a person? What does a person do? How many ethnic groups have the word person in their vocabulary? Most of the world refers to its members as men and women. The Bible states that God created men and women. What part does a person play in the propagation and preservation of the species? Persons do not desire to become attractive to other persons; their dress and behavior reflects this lack of desire. The attire of men has become slovenly and that of women runs the gamut between dressing as a street person or a porn queen.

Women do not naturally feel any joy in being a person. The motivator of a woman’s life is the ME aspect of her personality. The ME factor motivated a woman to become a good wife and mother. How does personhood satisfy the ME aspect of a woman? It doesn’t; other criteria have been developed in an attempt to satisfy the ME aspect of the female psyche.

Girls are now taught to go to school, get and education, get a job, and make some money, so that they can be somebody. A big step towards becoming that somebody requires obtaining a piece of paper that indicates completion of certain areas of rote learning. That paper will serve as a pass to do what ex-men do (relieved of their former authority they have now become jackasses on the treadmill of production). These pieces of paper that women receive entitle them to join the jackasses on the treadmill. Regardless of the name given to that piece of paper—whether degree or license—it falls under the greater heading of what I call “she-ass certificates.” These “she-ass certificates” serve as the primary criteria for hiring and admittance to the treadmill of production.

Part of the requirement of utilizing these she-ass certificates necessitates turning over to the state the responsibility of all aspects of child rearing. The state now sets the requirements for health, education, discipline, food, and dress for children. If these requirements are not met the child is taken from the custody of the she-ass certificate holder and given to other persons that the government deems qualified to raise children according to their standards.

Since men have been removed from all levels of authority and their organizations and institutions weakened the meaning and purpose of life has become obscured and ethics have disappeared as is evidenced by the removal of restrictive laws on incest in Europe. Three European Union nations -- France, Spain and Portugal -- do not prosecute consenting adults for incest, and Romania is considering following suit. It will soon become the norm in the Western world to conduct sexual relations between mother and son, father and daughter and brother and sister. Livestock raisers know that this type of inbreeding weakens the herd, but in a genderless person society apparently this fact has little significance.

The establishment of a genderless society had nothing to do with the liberation and benefit of women; on the contrary, women have lost out on all fronts. They are being used and abused and consequently suffer from mental, physical and spiritual deterioration. Feminists served as dupes of a sinister conspiracy to have government control all of society. By neutering the male all institutions designed for the propagation and preservation of the species were weakened or destroyed, which enabled the government to step in and take over the administration and control of every aspect of societal activity and in the process has reduced men and women (or persons) to the role of jackasses and she-asses on the treadmill of production.

Government can provide substitute authority but it cannot provide substitute ethics, which can only come from men; consequently we are witnessing the complete moral decline of the Western, genderless, person oriented world, which is responsible for the devastation of its women.

E.G.

UNDERMINING THE NATURAL PATRIARCHAL STRUCTURE

2009-04-16T18:41:00.001-07:00

One of our supporters forwarded me an excerpt of an evaluation of patriarchy in India, which I have posted below. I received his Email the same day that I sent an Email to Henry Makow of savethemales.ca concerning his article Helen Gurley Brown: “How to be a Whore.”

I will address patriarchy in India further in a subsequent essay. This essay will address the significance of Henry Makow’s article as it relates to the material Emailed to me and the action that Western man has taken about this matter, or more correctly, the action he hasn’t taken.

The excerpt follows:

The focus of this paper is domestic violence among rural women in India. The question asked by this study is: How do regional, family, and personal characteristics of a woman affect her likelihood of being hit by her husband?

Contrary to predicted results, however, being in a nuclear family structure, having greater decision-making power, and labor force participation increased the risk of women beingassaulted by their husbands. These surprising findings, taken together, suggest that the relationship between patriarchy and violence is not a clear-cut one.

A deeper understanding of the conditions under which violence is used by patriarchal families to control recalcitrant women will enable feminists and researchers to more fully comprehend the ways in which patriarchy controls women’s lives.

The conclusion reached in this study indicates that women are less likely to receive physical abuse in patriarchal environments than in Western nuclear family arrangements. Keep in mind that this study focused on patriarchy in Asia, a continent that has a gender imbalance just as Europe does except that in Asia the imbalance tilts towards the masculine, whereas, in Europe it more than tilts towards the feminine. In both cases women suffer. In Europe the suffering results from neglect by the masculine presence and in Asia the suffering results from abuse by the masculine presence. Nevertheless, we have a confirmed study that Asian women are less likely to suffer from abuse in patriarchal structure than those in the Western nuclear family arrangement.

Yet the intent on the part of feminists and liberals will be to debunk this study. We have only to look at the opening paragraph of Henry Makow’s article to learn why. He writes:

In 1965, Helen Gurley Brown, the editor of Cosmopolitan, said that a housewife was "a parasite, a dependent, a scrounger, a sponger or a bum." She didn't call them whores because she teaches them to be whores. Her sister-in-arms, Betty Friedan, compared homemakers to "concentration camp inmates" because of the lack of stimulation and opportunity for advancement in concentration camps.

These two women along with contingents of other feminists and an army of liberals attacked the very foundations of human existence. These were Western women, working through the governments of Western nations. And what did Western man do about it? What did the religious right do? What did the Catholic Archbishops do? What did the Imams here and abroad do? What did real men do? What did anybody do to protect humankind from the self-inflicted scourge of Western society?

I say self-inflicted because feminism did not develop from some organism found under a rock or in the trunk of a tree. It did not come from an asteroid crashing into the earth’s atmosphere and spewing out a virus. Western man created feminism. Not only did he create it but, but he brags about his enlightenment—how he gave women equal rights in all things. Why is that considered an achievement? What is the benefit of treating dissimilars as similars? By bringing women into the organizations that men create—and which women on their own cannot create or maintain—causes the weakening of the organization and the defeating of its ultimate purpose, to provide the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture the race.

In the more than forty years since Helen Gurley Brown expressed her degenerative opinions the lot of the American woman has done just that—degenerated. The number one health issue of the American woman is debilitating depression. Close to 10% of the adult female population suffers from this malady. In Europe where feminism has taken stronger root 15% of its women suffer from depression. Do those figure indicate progress for women?

What were the men doing as this monstrous attack on human life progressed? We can say that we didn’t know, that we were busy earning a livelihood and raising a family. Really? From the earliest days of television “family entertainment” such as “The Honeymooners” depicted men as buffoons and women as the stable and dependable homemakers. Didn’t we all see that? Didn’t we see the end of all male educational institutions and clubs? Didn’t we see our sons taught physical education together with girls? Didn’t we see the teaching of promiscuity taught in the schools and all the media? Didn’t we see pornography and smut develop into accepted businesses? Didn’t we read articles such as Do We Need Men Anymore, which appeared in US News and World Report, or witness Oprah expressing the same sentiments to millions of viewers? Did we miss all that?

We have witnessed an overt attack on the fundamentals necessary to maintain human existence, and it has been and still is overwhelmingly successful. Right now conservatives are introducing legislation in various state legislatures calling for equal rights for men. The feminists must roll in the aisles with laughter every time they read of such activities. I find the very thought of men asking a third party to treat them equally with women, repugnant, especially when that third party is responsible for the usurpation of their manly authority.

We can no longer claim unawareness to the degenerative conditions around us. In addition to savethemales.ca there is rense.com and books by David Icke describing in detail the conditions caused by deliberate attacks on natural value systems. Videos can be seen of these conditions on nmatv.com, on youtube, and on a host of other websites. Whoever does not see these conditions does not want to see.

The time to take action is at hand, and Men’s Action to Rebuild Society offers a vehicle through which to do it. It has a mission statement, essays, videos, information materials, and most importantly a message. It calls for a patriarchal way of life to be conducted outside of the mainstream of society. It calls for an understanding of the purpose of human existence—the propagation and preservation of the species while on the path of spiritual growth. The only thing required for it to succeed is a collective will. Do you have the will to make change? If so, then subscribe to our website, and join with others in spreading the word.

The time for action has arrived.

E.G.

GENDER AND RELIGION

2009-04-13T03:09:00.000-07:00

Newsweek’s cover story for the April 13th issue entitled The End of Christian America, provided me with the motivation to address religion from a gender perspective—something I had intended to do for a long time. However, as I started writing this essay I realized that the Newsweek story came out during Easter Week. For an international news magazine to promote its lead story with the words The Decline And Fall Of Christian America written in large red letters on a black background of its cover during the holiest week of the Christian calendar was an “in your face” attitude of disrespect by the media.

This blatant public disregard of the feelings of the Christian community in essence proved the point of the publishers. What would or could the Christian community do about it? The article—like most that appear in major news magazines—covered both ends of the spectrum that they addressed in an effort to show fairness; however, the headline and title of the article delivered the message. This attack on religion by the media and the powers that control it is part of a planned effort to destroy religious influence in society. I have addressed this issue in other articles and will now continue with the original intent of this essay.

The Newsweek article expressed little understanding of the reasons for the waning of religious and non-governmental institutional influence. I will comment on both of these conditions, as one bears upon the other. The reader familiar with my message will see gender woven into many paragraphs.

Religions are feminine in nature and reflect the materialization and personalization of unseen spiritual truths. They also represent the understanding by the local populace of matters spiritual and its resultant method of worship, which accounts for the same religion having dissimilar practices in different parts of the world.

Religions represent the common understanding and interpretation of the unseen by a particular group of people. This understanding might be based on scripture and/or from the sayings of prophets and other categories of “holy men.”

Changes in religion are not changes of the truth, which cannot be changed, but in the understanding of the truth, which continually changes. The Christian religion had its first change in understanding when Eastern Orthodoxy broke away from Roman Catholicism. The next major change came with the Protestant Reformation, which ushered in several different denominations. Every major religion has its various offshoots or sects, which represent groups of people with a similar understanding of matters spiritual.

The practice of considering religions as synonymous with scripture reflects erroneous thinking. Differences—sometimes vast—exist between religious practices and their sources. Christianity in particular was formed by a feminine materialistic culture more than three hundred years after the death of Jesus and spearheaded into acceptance by a Roman emperor who worshiped the Sun god. All liturgical Christian denominations derive their liturgy from the ritualistic worship of the Sun god for which there is no basis in the vast spiritual compendium called the Bible. Significant remnants of the European culture in the Middle East during the time of Mohammed influenced the interpretation of the Koran and the practice of Islam.

The spiritual understanding of a religion and its ability to communicate it varies inversely with the authority required to maintain its influence. The more that a religion can teach, guide, and train its members, the less authority it needs. Religions that preach blind obedience to dogma require complete authority over their members.

As spiritual awareness of people grows they become less inclined to have religious authority imposed upon them and instead seek to increase their understanding of themselves and their world. On the other hand, people want a certainty and constancy of matters spiritual. They want religion to be authoritative without it becoming authoritarian. The European influenced religions have never offered much enlightenment to its members and now that they have lost their authority they are rapidly losing their influence in society.

The societal structure in which religions function also affects their influence upon that society. Religions little influenced by European thinking offer great enlightenment and seemingly hold little authority over their members even though vast populations operate in accordance with their teachings. These religions function in a patriarchal society, which by definition has authority. There is respect for the father, the mother, for elders, for ancestors, for everybody and everything. Religions do not need added authority in patriarchal societies. Society IS the authority and all activity centers about the well-being of the family—the core of all patriarchal societies. You can be sure that the gurus, swamis, and enlightened masters that now offer their enlightenment to the Western world did not do anything without the blessings of their fathers.

We do not have such a society in America or the Western world, hence the Newsweek cover article indicating the decline of Christian influence in America. Indeed it has declined, and for two significant reasons. It has failed to provide enlightenment of the true meaning of Biblical scripture and instead relied upon fear to maintain its hold on the people. Secondly, all institutional authority in America and the Western world has collapsed.

While all religions are feminine in nature, the structure in which they function is masculine. Men build organizations; an inherent trait that manifests early in childhood. Boys form clubs, teams, and gangs. They know the abilities of each of their members: who can yell the loudest, run the fastest, lift the most, spit the furthest and even pee the furthest. These traits are utilized when it comes time to accomplishing a task that requires the participation of all members. As the boys grow into manhood the purpose of forming groupings becomes manifest—to provide the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture it. Whether to form a sailing crew, hunting party, or defensive detachment, the objective remains the same: the care of women and children.

Now that Western governments have done a comprehensive and thorough job of legislating away all male authority, all organizations and institutions have lost their virility. Civilizations decline when virility declines. All institutions and organizations in the Western culture have declined in influence and now rely on government support and involvement in one way or another as it attempts to become the substitute male.

The institution of the Church requires the same masculine leadership as any other institution. Its failure to provide this leadership is self-imposed. Focus on the Family for example, in its three decades of existence never extolled the virtues of manhood. It believes it can build families with fathers but without men. It does not understand the patriarchal structure of the universe. This thinking permeates all of Western society and consequently the influence of all its institutions are declining including its religious institutions.

As humankind continues its quest for spiritual meaning, the trend to meditation and an awareness of unseen forces increases; however, a new spiritually oriented world will not come about without the development of natural gender relationships called patriarchy. Enlightened or not, people need the patriarchal structure in which to function. Chanting OM, Amen or praying the Rosary will not sidestep that need.

E.G.

SHIFT IN WESTERN THOUGHT CLOSE AT HAND

2009-04-07T04:05:00.001-07:00

In my frequent referral to the gender imbalance of Western thought it might be perceived that I do not appreciate all that it has accomplished. To the contrary, I am well aware that the industrious nature of Western thought has literally moved mountains and produced an unprecedented amount of material development. The feminine principle reflects industriousness; therefore, feminine, materialistic, Western thought will by its nature produce great quantities of material product.

Western man has exhibited an almost superhuman intensity of thought and physical activity in his efforts to produce more goods and services for the world. Whether climbing frigid mountains with 100 pounds of belongings strapped to his back in order to enter the Yukon and search for gold, or forging a path through mosquito infested tropical forests of Panama to build a canal, he has endured severe physical hardship to reach his goals. His prodigious mental achievements exhibit similar stamina. Authors such as Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, and Turgenev wrote their voluminous works in longhand in pen and ink. John A Roebling, builder of the Brooklyn Bridge designed every component of the bridge himself. Superhuman efforts and their resultant achievements permeate the history of Western man.

However, for all his industriousness, pioneering efforts, and inventiveness, and the huge material accumulations that they have produced, Western man has not found truth or peace—the ingredients for happiness. He has looked in the wrong places. The following parable will shed some light on his misdirected efforts.

A man searched every corner of his garden for his keys. After a few hours of this activity his wife came to the window and calling out to him asked what he was looking for. He told her that he had misplaced his keys. When she asked him where he had seen them last he replied that he last saw them in the house. She then asked why he didn’t look in the house and he replied, “I see better out here.”

Western thought functions best in the material world that it sees; therefore its activities relate to external pursuits. Truth and peace however, reside within, and cannot be found through the external searches of Western thought. Unable to find truth, even after diligent search, Western man developed theories, which are guesses as to what the truth might be. He especially likes to develop economic theories, which he hopes will give meaning and justification to his material pursuits. Keynes, Friedman, Malthus, Galbraith, Smith, Marx, and Veblen have all espoused economic theory and their names have migrated into the common Western lexicon. None of these economic theories ever work, and as I write this article an international meeting is taking place to determine what to do about the deepening world economic crises.

Western thought creates theories about all observable phenomena and academic disciplines. Some of the more famous are Einstein’s theory of relativity and Darwin’s theory of evolution, but there are psychiatric, medical, nutritional, and political theories as well. All theories eventually pass away as new observations are made along with the development of supporting data.

At this point my sons and daughters I interject that my message about the universal principle of gender and the patriarchal structure is not a theory; it is a truth. It does not require proof, only understanding. Western thought has difficulty with understanding because it has made a god of the material world and has developed a belief structure based upon what it can “see.” A collection of what it sees has been given the fancy name of “empirical data” and is used as “supporting evidence” for its theories.

Getting back to the thread of this essay, there are two approaches that the man in the garden can use to find his keys. He can start to look inside the house where he would more easily find the keys, or he can increase the intensity of his search on the outside. He can pull out all the weeds, then the flowers, and then every bit of vegetation until he leaves the garden completely barren. He will then deduce that if the keys are not on the outside they must be on the inside where he last had a glimpse of them.

Western man has chosen the latter option. He will develop one theory after another, as he continues to exploit the material world in his quest for peace and truth. Only after he has significantly disrupted the natural order of things without coming any closer to peace and truth, will he come to the realization that maybe he has been looking in the wrong place.

He is close to that point now as he sees the earth deteriorating from the ravaging of its resources and his own life suffering from increasing economic exploitation and environmental pollution.

Once he decides to go inside he will find the keys that will unlock the door to peace and truth; which will enable him to get on the road to happiness. The inner quest requires the same diligence and passion that accompanied his material accomplishments. It will require service, devotion and an expression of love in all that he does. He will come to the realization that just as everything seen outside the house in the parable—its color, state of repair, type of garden, and condition of the property—depends upon the unseen thinking inside the house, so does all that he sees in this world come from unseen influences. He will come to realize the necessity of maintaining a balance between the inner and outer, between the seen and the unseen.

As he changes his direction and begins to spend more time looking within he will come to the further realization that he couldn’t be on this new path if he wasn’t here; therefore, in order to make it possible for others to gain access to the same path the primary activity and objective of humankind must be its propagation and preservation.

The propagation and preservation of the species requires the efforts of a receptive adaptable, responsive, and caring entity that will bring forth life and nurture it. In order to function properly that entity requires a secure environment and the means with which to conduct its nurturing. It is the responsibility of man to provide the environment and means for this function to take place. It can only be done through the interplay and balance of gender called patriarchy.

That’s the truth.

E.G.

THE CHANGE MAKERS

2009-04-03T06:30:00.000-07:00

Who will bring about change in society? Who can we look upon to leave the beaten track and pioneer the different? Who will stand up and take the abuse and face the ridicule of others who want to maintain the status quo? To answer those questions we also need to ask why and when people seek change. Dissatisfaction with themselves or their surroundings causes people to seek change. People might be dissatisfied with their appearance, locale, employment, health, negative habits, or relationships. When the dissatisfaction reaches a point that they can no longer tolerate—when they hurt enough— then they begin to seek change.

We will address who will make change in depth; however, another area to explore before discerning who makes societal change is to determine who won’t make change. Those who depend upon the existing structure for their livelihood in one way or another will resist change. Those who receive government doles will be loathe to make change and destroy the hand that feeds them. Our government provides increasing supplements to people’s services in order to maintain their dependency upon it (government) and quell any thoughts of change.

The professional class will express the same conservatism towards change as people on the dole, for the system has made it possible for them to prosper; to change the system puts their livelihood in danger. You will not see doctors, lawyers, educators, and corporate executives supporting change unless they have left their chosen fields. People with a vested interest in the system cannot muster the courage to change it; they want to work inside of it. They want to “fix” it. Those people will not make change.

Unfortunately it is from these ranks that Men’s Rights Organizations (MRO) draw their support. Oh, how they love to put on their letterhead advisory boards containing prestigious names that will add authenticity, stature, and renown to their organization. These prestigious people represent the system and they will not support any change to it. The MRO’s have not built a following because they have not reached out to those who want change, and they have not done that because they are part of the same aristocracy they complain about. They want to “fix” things, not change things.

Now that we have identified those who won’t make change we can more easily determine who will make change. The disenfranchised, minorities, unemployed, disenchanted youth, the frustrated, the outcasts and the misfits of society will make change. Those who earn their livings from their individual efforts such as house painters, photographers, limousine operators, carpenters, small business operators, musicians, painters, writers, blue collar workers and white collar workers who feel that life offers more than routine labor will also step forward to make change.

These people will readily give of their time, talents, and treasures. They do not consider that they are giving anything up, but on the contrary they feel they are investing in a message and way of life that they believe in and want to propagate. They give out of proportion to their worth because they believe the life they live under the present system has become increasingly worthless. The true fanatics necessary to materialize a movement come from these ranks. They want change and will go to great lengths to make it happen; in their eyes all that exists is garbage, and they see no sense in reforming garbage.

The above description applies to people who want to make change at most any time in history. The characteristics of those who want to make change in our specific environment will also be discussed, but first I take this opportunity to express my elation that the supporters of Men’s Action come form this group and I am grateful to them for their support. They have demonstrated the characteristics that I have described. Some have voluntarily ordered three, five, or a dozen or more of my books to give to friends, family and acquaintances. They have done the same in distributing my information booklets. Recently the first order arrived for a packet of the fliers The Raw Truth, which one of our supporters will distribute to his friends and acquaintances. Yesterday I was pleasantly surprised to receive a donation of $100 through our website. Outreach on the part of our supporters has begun to increase. My essays and videos are being placed on other websites. The message has taken root and is now gradually expanding.

Regarding the specific dissatisfaction of those who seek change today, they have become keenly aware that men have lost their natural authority, that the family has been destroyed, standards have deteriorated, and that it requires more labor to earn enough to pay for the essentials of life. They have become aware of a government that has expanded its reach into every aspect of their lives and is putting forth efforts at solidifying and expanding this reach under the guise of benevolence. They have become aware that they no longer have authority over anything and are being reduced to automaton workers and directed consumers. Maybe they just didn’t enjoy living in a home without a father and with a stressed out mother. Maybe they didn’t like being treated the same as girls in school and women in the workplace. This group has expressed frustration with the impotence of existing political institutions and has come to a realization that fundamental changes need to be made and that these changes can only occur outside of the system.

These men and supportive women will spearhead the change that will come about in order for society to survive. On the one hand they are fighting what appears to be tremendous obstacles, a firmly entrenched materialistic aristocracy that controls the media, political structure, educational system and the economy. On the other hand they are up against an enemy that has no purpose other than self-aggrandizement. Its members lack both virility and spiritual understanding. Eventually the entire system will implode.

To all who have accepted my message I say that the task before us is not to attack a decaying entity, but to prepare ourselves for a better life. The Men’s Action mission statement calls for fostering a more natural way of life for humankind. The first step in doing that calls for the rebuilding of the family. We have to enlighten and empower men so that they can once again handle the responsibilities of being a husband and a father. All systems, procedures, rituals, and societal structures will evolve out of that understanding and purpose.

Now that you know who will make change and if you are one of them, I offer a bit of advice. Welcome into your ranks those who tried to make change through institutions of their choice but failed. Whether liberals or conservatives, democrats, republicans, independents, and others of various persuasions, welcome them into the fold. Give them a new vehicle and a message. Work together to create a life outside of the system. Keep spreading the word, handing our material, and referring people to our website. Be a change maker.

E.G.

THE SOCIETY OF THE FUTURE

2009-03-29T19:34:00.000-07:00

In my first attempt at writing an opening paragraph for this essay I referred to the materially oriented aristocratic way of the life of the West. As I proceeded with the essay I reflected upon my readership, which consists for the most part of people of European extraction, and realized that some might be annoyed that I belabor the description of Western society as materialistic and aristocratic. I empathize with their feelings, as both of my parents were of European origin and I am not comfortable with people criticizing my way of life either; however, as I see it crumbling about me if someone were to point out why, I would become receptive to their criticism. It is with this thought in mind that I will expound upon the feminine, materialistic, and aristocratic nature of Western thought and its societal effects.

In my last essay I referred to author David Icke’s alien reptilian conspiracy theory in which he claims that reptilian aliens have infiltrated the earth primarily through the European culture. He speaks of their concept of royalty and aristocracy and refers frequently to their worship of the mother goddess. An independently made conservative film titled Indoctrinate-U contains a segment in which a liberal white professor says that whiteness is oppression and racism is an example of it. He goes on to say that to do away with oppression is to do away with whiteness. These were strong terms that I will come back to. However since my mind was focusing on the term aristocracy it motivated me to check The Republic and in it I found that the one form of government that Plato liked is the Aristocracy. Here we have the post Socratic and truly European thinking of the Greeks—which I believe began with Plato— admiring the aristocratic form of government.

Whether Elder George though his understanding of the universal principle of gender, or Davis Icke with his reptilian theory, or the political science professor in the film Indoctrinate-U, or Plato, the observation is that Europeans develop aristocracies. They do, and there is a reason for it.

Before addressing the reason for Western aristocratic thought I refer to the comments of the professor in Indoctrinate-U who refers to racism as white oppression. I consider racism to be one of many examples of the Western aristocracy. Even in an all white environment the aristocratic thinking presents itself in the form of religious, ethnic, educational or economic exclusivity. This aristocratic thinking is evident in both conservative and liberal attitudes. The very professor that complained about white suppression was himself an oppressor in the academic profession in which non-liberal thought was ostracized, persecuted, and rooted out.

The Western aristocracy is evident all over the world, although it frequently goes unrecognized, especially by Americans who have an extreme naiveté when it comes to understanding other cultures. All of South America is one huge European aristocracy. Those Hispanics that we see in our country are of Indian or black extraction and are not welcome into the aristocracy. I have seen this first hand in my travels to Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Columbia, Panama, and in my marriage to a member of the Cuban aristocracy. General Batistia the dictator of pre-Castro Cuba was never invited to the Havana Yacht Club because he was not a member of the aristocracy.

As I worked on this essay I learned through the internet that Brazilian President Lulu de Silva blamed the world financial crises on “white and blue eyed bankers” and indicated that there weren’t any black bankers in the mix. Eventually there will be, but first their thinking will have to be in accord with the governing aristocracy.

Now in finally getting to the reason for aristocratic European thinking we must first determine where this thinking originates and why. In the relationship between males and females the male represents the masculine assertive influence and the female represents the feminine receptive entity. In the human mating process the female (woman) has to make herself attractive to the male (man) so that he will select and pursue her. She focuses on the ME aspect of her personality in the hopes that the man will choose her over other women. She tries to be better than the other women in the attributes that the male considers worthy of mating. Even after she mates she tries to show that she maintains the expectations of men better than other women do.

When the primary classification of women was called housewife or homemaker, women would frequently have tea parties or café klatches in each other’s homes. These activities gave them an opportunity to evaluate how the other women took care of their home, children, and husbands. Those who did not meet the standards of the inner group were drummed out of the circle. Those who did the drumming out were members of the clique. Among females cliques begin in pre-kindergarten, continue through the school system, and in all organizations containing women throughout their entire lives. The formal name for clique is aristocracy.

Aristocracies have their benefit for they tend to level people up. The activity of tea parties and café klatches leveled up the entire social strata. The housewives made sure their homes were shinny bright, their children well behaved, and their cooking and/or serving flawless when the women came to visit. Aristocracies tend to level up all areas of activity, which is fine provided that it takes place within the environment of the tempering effect of the masculine influence. Left to their own accord women will ultimately exclude themselves completely—there is only room for one Oprah in any grouping of women. In the larger sense all aristocracies will ultimately collapse.

Now that we have seen the genderless society (which means the suppression of the masculine influence) firmly established in America and Europe and in growing areas of the world, women no longer have standards to uphold. As a consequence marriage has faltered, unwed motherhood has mushroomed, chastity has disappeared, and moral decadence has grown. People indulge themselves in various forms of behavior that in essence provides escape from the un-natural way of life imposed by a ruling materialistic aristocracy. Consequently mental illness has taken over as the number one health issue of Western countries.

All aristocracies will ultimately collapse because they lack purpose. Aristocracies represent the feminine “ME” aspect of life and become almost devoid of the masculine “I” aspect of life. The masculine principle provides direction and purpose; without it society collapses. Solomon wrote, “Where there is no vision, the people shall perish.” Of course they will perish. Vision gives purpose, and purpose provides the structure and functioning of society. Western thought has created a purposeless self-indulgent aristocratic society that is collapsing before our very eyes. The solution requires a change in thinking.

That thinking has to come out of its narrow materialistic paradigm and expand into a more gender balanced value structure with an awareness of the purpose of life, which is the propagation and preservation of the species while on the journey of spiritual growth. To attain that objective there will be an evolvement into patriarchy, the natural societal structure.

Whether we go through a cataclysmic change, a mass spiritual enlightenment, a revolution against the tyranny that is building up in our government, or individuals and small groups starting to live their lives differently, the end result will see the re-establishment of patriarchy. As Solomon also said, “There is nothing new under the Sun.” Other forms of government will rise and fall, but patriarchy will always return.

The future society will be patriarchal. We can prepare for it now or deal with it when it is thrust upon us. In either case we will have to adjust our thinking to properly live in it.

In my next essay I will describe those who will bring about change in this society and spearhead the development of patriarchy.

E.G.

THE DEMISE OF WESTERN SOCIETY

2009-03-23T19:10:00.000-07:00

Most people know that something fundamental is wrong with society; they don’t know what it is, how to replace it or who will replace it. This essay—the first of three—will explain what wont work. The second essay will explain what will work, and the third essay will describe who will bring about change.

Every institution created by Western thought will collapse as they are all built upon an aristocratic and materialistic foundation. All aristocracies ultimately destroy themselves and all things material eventually disintegrate.

Western society cannot be fixed—it cannot be changed—it is imploding. The fathers of the Constitution such as Madison, Jefferson, and Adams realized that it would eventually lead to tyranny and rued that they had taken part in creating it. Democracy has never worked anywhere. None of the institutions created by Western man are effective. They all lead to control. The nature of Western thought is to control. Ecumenism, universal healthcare, and no child left behind are all vehicles of control. Increasing numbers of those associated with our government now openly call for a one-world order.

The nature of our political leadership works to strengthen governmental control. We have a governing aristocracy that functions well in any political organization and it gravitates to one party or another as opportunity and necessity dictate.

New York City has a mayor who belonged to the Democrat Party but obtained his current position by running on the republican ticket. General Clark belonged to the Republican Party but ran for president on the democratic ticket. Senator Kerry, presidential candidate of the Democrat Party tried to influence republican Senator McCain to run as vice-president. Democrat Senator Lieberman ran for re-election as an independent and supported the presidential candidacy of Senator McCain. It is common knowledge that the Bush’s and Clinton’s visit each other. Our new president who campaigned on the promise of change has an administration made up of democratic and republican regulars. The same group always runs our country regardless of which political label they wear at the time. How then can we expect government to make change? The government created an out-of –sync with nature system; it will not change it.

In my lifetime from the beginning of the Great Depression to the present there has been a continuous growth of government and a breakdown of the family. There has not been a resolution to any problem and all problems have increased in magnitude. Let’s take a look at the more pronounced issues facing this nation.

We have the world’s largest prison population. The United States has 5% of the world’s population and 25% of its prisoners. We have 2.4 million of our brothers and sisters rotting away in cages, and this figure does not include those in local jails, on parole, and on probation. Our prison population has increased 15 fold since 1930, and we call our country the land of the free. If we challenge this statement about our freedom we are called un-American. Oh how we love our oppressors.

The unwed motherhood rate has during that same period of time increased from a little over 1% to 30% today. That should come as no surprise as children raised without fathers provide 90% of the prison population.

The number one debilitating illness of the American woman is depression with upwards of 10 million suffering from that disease, and the number one health issue of the United States is mental illness. Suicide causes more deaths in America than does homicide. We are a nation that is literally going out of its mind.

American boys rank as the most violent in the world. They provide a growing field of recruitment for street gangs and prospects for future incarceration.

The educational system continues to deteriorate. A test given to high school graduates in the 1950’s when given to college seniors 50 years later resulted in lower scores by the college seniors. John Taylor Gatto—a distinguished public school teacher—in his book Dumbing Us Down, felt our youth would be better served if public schools were shut down altogether.

The very core of our society has been in a state of continuous decline, especially during the past 50 years. This decline has seen the tentacles of government reach into every area of our private lives. It has grown in size and influence. It has destroyed the primary institution of humankind—family—and rushed in to institutionalize the care of every aspect of societal activity.

I have said many times in my columns that the thinking used to create a problem cannot be used to solve that problem. Last week I came across the following statement from Albert Einstein, “Problems cannot be solved at the same level of awareness that created them.” That’s just another way of stating the same truth. Western society will not change until it changes its thinking, and it shows no proclivity to do so. On the contrary it is digging in and hoping that its impotent institutions whether political, religious, educational, or professional will find some miracle that will somehow change everything.
It will not happen.

Perhaps it cannot happen because of the set feminine, materialistic, and aristocratic basis of European thought. In his tome The David Icke Guide to the Global Conspiracy (and how to end it), David Icke espouses a theory that reptilian aliens have infiltrated the earth primarily through the European culture. He speaks of their concept of royalty and aristocracy and their obsession with ritual and hierarchy. That’s pretty much the description I have used these many years and I never heard of David Icke until a few months ago.

I do not speak in terms of theories but in terms of truth that has been revealed to me. Nevertheless, the conspiracy groups that Icke refers to whether tri-lateralists, Bilderbergers, Jesuits, Masons, Zionists, or a host of others, are all Europeans. They created the Federal Reserve and the global banking systems that are exercising increasing control over us.

Western thought cannot change the issues confronting us—it created these issues. It’s over. It’s done. Bye-bye Western society.

Those concerned people who know that something fundamental is amiss in our society and who try to make change through the institutions they are familiar with are becoming increasingly frustrated. Whether conservative or liberal, democrat, republican, or libertarian, religious or non-religious, their energies are being dissipated through impotent institutions that will not change. It’s time to direct those positive energies into another venue, into another paradigm of thinking.

That other paradigm is patriarchy. It focuses on the family—the only natural institution—and is in harmony with the universal vibrations.

I will be writing about that in my next essay The Society of the Future.

Until then, I ask that you take a good look at society as it continues to crumble before your very eyes. Are you going to just watch it happen or will you do something to prepare for your survival and a return to a natural way of life?

E.G.

REAL MEN DON’T RUN AWAY

2009-03-15T17:00:00.000-07:00

Two of my readers, one from the East Coast and one from the West Coast alerted me to Henry Makow’s article The Men Who Ran Away, which appeared on rense.com as well as his website. I normally don’t comment on other people’s articles, as I have my own agenda as to what I will write about, as they have theirs. However, since my readers felt that this article was germane to my message rather than comment on it other than to say it clearly reflects upon what has happened to the males of society, I decided to write about what it triggered in my mind.

First, I will briefly narrate an event that occurred on the New York City subway about a year ago. It was in the afternoon on the elevated section of the #1 train when two teenage boys, one black and one white started giggling and screaming and running up and down the car. They had apparently seen a mouse running under the seats along the length of the car. They made such a commotion that I finally told them that they were acting like girls and to keep quiet.

That incident provides further evidence of what has happened to the males of our society. They act like females. In a genderless society the males will always tend to act like females because females can’t act like males. Males can be neutered by castration. To the best of my knowledge there has never been a testes implant to females. Male characteristics can be removed but they cannot be transplanted; therefore, in a genderless society the government will attempt to substitute for the male. Thus we have in our genderless society big government and none of the positive attributes of the male.

In our modern world men are not physically castrated but they are mentally and legally neutered. They are raised in homes without competent fathers, educated in schools that cater to female understanding, told that they are no different from girls, banned from having men’s clubs, and removed from all familial authority.

Boys and girls need training to fulfill their natural obligation to the family and tribe. They need to be trained for the responsibilities of parenthood and their obligations to the greater good. By removing male authority we have reduced men to be nothing more than workers—jackasses on the treadmill of production. The women wanting parity have become she-asses on the same treadmill. They no longer need males. They do however, want security guards, surveillance cameras, and locks, gates, and fences to provide for their protection. Somehow these devices didn’t work at L’Ecole Polytechnique in Canada, or at Virginia Tech and Columbine High School in the United States. No amount of security can protect people against a society that does not have ethics and the moral behavior that results from it. Men develop ethics and moral standards. Real men have courage to stand up and protect women and children. The function of the male is to provide the environment and means for the female to bring life into this world and nurture it. No men—no ethics, morals, or protection.

When family served as the focus of societal activity the ritual of marriage signified a commitment on the part of both people to fulfill their obligations to each other and to the greater society. In the selection of mates the female looked for the strongest most powerful male to protect her—especially during the time of pregnancy when she was most vulnerable—while she went about her nurturing activities.

Now that marriage has gone our of style and being a loyal wife and devoted mother are no longer held in high esteem we have developed into a society of workers—jackasses and she-asses—who are measured by the loads they haul. The government attempts to provide protection by onerous laws against men and a multitude of security measures to protect women from those evil men.

Apparently the system doesn’t work very well as 10% of the adult female population suffers from debilitating depression. Maybe they are beginning to realize that being a she-ass isn’t as secure and self-fulfilling as being a wife and mother.

The only hope that they have of getting out of their un-natural and debilitating lifestyle is to pray that somehow a few real men will rise up and make the changes necessary to provide a natural way of life. Real men don’t run away.

In the interim increasing numbers of women will have to settle for taking tranquilizers and anti-depressants while working under surveillance cameras as they pull their loads.

E.G.

TIME TO PREPARE FOR CHANGE

2009-03-09T11:22:00.000-07:00

Upon the creation of the physical universe gender came into existence. An understanding of and attunement with gender—the source of all movement—results in harmony with universal vibrations whereas, ignorance and/or a disregard of gender results in disharmony, which in societal structures leads to chaos, decline, and dissolution.

Today I will address the causes of the disharmony that engulfs our society and what to do about it. Author David Icke attributes the negative conspiracy theories that Henry Makow covers so well in his essays on savethemales.ca to be a result of an alien reptilian influence manifested primarily among Europeans. Whether the actions taken by these conspirators are the result of an alien influence or the result of ignorance (which is the source of all evil) the method used to control society is the same; it calls for the breakdown of the family structure.

An event that had significant worldwide implications concerning the breakdown of the family but which the media all but ignored was the 4th International Conference on Women held in Beijing, China in 1995. This conference called for the elimination of gender in all societal activities, and for the elimination of religious influence as well. The United Nations sponsored this event and supported it with its huge financial resources and international political influence. It should be noted that Hillary Clinton and Bella Abzug were but two of the heavy hitters of the feminist movement that attended that conference.

This event sought the destruction of the family through the noble sounding goal of equality for women, which translated meant equal authority in the home. No organization has two heads because it cannot survive with two masters; a truism that applies to the family as well. The removal of male authority from the family results in its destruction and makes the government the arbiter of relationships between people. All modern marriage and divorce laws now focus on the relationship between people, not families. The almost 14 years that have elapsed since the conference in Beijing, has seen an extensive attainment of its goal.

The “liberation” of women was a cruel hoax used as one of the vehicles to destroy male authority and put the population under control by government. Women have suffered horribly since their so-called liberation, especially Western women. Whatever the conspiratorial organization, whether the Illuminati, Bilderbergers, Trilateralists, Zionists, Jesuits, or Satanists, or others, the primary method of control consists of the removal of male authority, the destruction of the family, and the elimination of all standards. Government control cannot occur without the destruction of patriarchy.

To remedy this influence of centralized government control does not require an attack on the perceived enemy. Evil is the absence of good just as sickness is the absence of health. Diabetes, cancer, autism, and arthritis do not exist as entities unto themselves. They are symptoms of poor health caused by the pollution of air, water, food, or thinking. When the causes are removed the symptoms will disappear.

When we walk in the light the darkness disappears. Part of the light is an understanding of gender, the importance of family, and the patriarchal structure that makes it possible. Family is the only institution necessary for the development of humankind. All the manmade institutions were designed as substitutes for the patriarchal structure and eventually became means of control. We now have government institutions controlling, education, health, employment, business, and societal relationships. We are almost completely controlled.

The un-natural control upon us will eventually self-destruct and all its institutions will come down with it. Only one institution will survive—the original one—the family. The propagation and preservation of the species is the focus of universal activity. All of nature revolves about the family and the extended family, which we call the tribe.

After the collapse occurs spiritually based and gender oriented men who know that their responsibility requires them to provide the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture the race will start the rebuilding.

The collapse of our society is near at hand and now is the time to prepare for the rebuilding. However, it must come from outside of the conventional thinking and activity of our society. Men must realize the power within themselves. They are part of the Adam power of the world, which is the only power and it is manifested in men in the form of virility. Institutions are not virile. The only power they have is the power that men give to them or that men let them have.

On our website I have a streaming video titled Vagina Vocational Centers in which I call upon men to leave college. Sometimes the men ask what will happen to them. Nothing will happen to them. They will still have their manhood; the universities won’t, and there is no institution that can survive if in someway it is not connected to men. Men have built every institution. If they were all to crumble men could rebuild them. It is the institutions that will be in trouble when men leave them—all of them.

Do not concern yourself with the institutions that men have made or corrupt organizations. Concern yourselves instead with the power within you, for it is the unseen power within that controls the material world that is seen. I realize that for most Western men this is a difficult undertaking because the approach of Western society has been to address all issues through institutions ever since the Greeks first turned over to the city-states the care of society while they pursued material interests. The forming of institutions is a feminine reaction that wants to associate with a strong external entity. This focus on institutions has caused many modern writers to address all issues on an institutional basis without even thinking about what individuals can do to make change. It has caused people to be dependent upon the certificates, degrees, and licenses that institutions bestow upon those who have given the proper recitations.

Some of the most successful people of our time did not have any institutional recognition. Bill Gates and his VP dropped out of college, as did Steve Jobs and his VP. Bronson of Virgin Air is a high school dropout. Edison was a grade school dropout as was Premier Krushchev of Russia. Most of the famous African-American bandleaders and musicians could not read music—neither could the Beatles.

The power of men does not require authentication by an institution. Men authenticate institutions. It is only necessary for men to realize the power within and utilize the universal will to translate this power into action. Patriarchy is a spiritual concept that provides the vehicle for the manifestation of this action. Spread the message of patriarchy far and wide and you will find increasing numbers who understand and are willing to step forward and live the life they were ordained to live by providing for the care of women and children.

Say to yourselves upon arising I AM A MAN, I AM A MAN, I AM A REAL MAN. Say it as you are walking down the street. Say it whenever you have doubt about what you can do to change or build a better society. There is no power on the face of the earth that can withstand the collective assertive power of the masculine principle. Not one!

THE DECLINE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE WEST

2009-03-04T05:18:00.001-08:00

The March 2nd issue of Newsweek contained an article by Joel Kotkin entitled Death of the Dream, which focused on the decline of the technological, political, and environmental leadership of California, which I thought would be of interest to you because the fundamental reasons for this decline—while not addressed in the article—are germane to our message.

Before writing an essay critiquing Joel Kotkin’s article I decided to check his area of expertise. He is executive editor of newgeography.com, the author of six books, a fellow of urban affairs at Chapman University, and a Senior Fellow at The New America foundation. He also writes in a pleasant non-adversarial manner and strikes me as a person who would be a friendly neighbor. He is obviously a learned man in the area of Western thought and therein lies his limitation in assessing the problems of California or of America, which he addresses on the on the homepage of joelkotkin.com.

Joel Kotkin’s Newsweek article opened with the following paragraph: “For decades, California has epitomized America’s economic strengths: technological excellence, artistic creativity, agricultural fecundity and an intrepid entrepreneurial spirit. Yet lately California has projected a grimmer vision of a politically divided, economically stagnant state.”

Mr. Kotkin laments the decline of technological, political, and environmental leadership in California and attempts to explain this fall from leadership in economic, ideological, and demographic terms. He addresses all issues as though they occur in a finite materialistic arena. He seems to not understand that all materialistic events are effects of unseen actions and unless the unseen changes, the seen will continue to deteriorate.

The one unseen area of influence that he touches upon gingerly and refers to as “its own culture of self-regard” and “an evermore inward-looking form of narcissism,” he tends to treat as a mild character flaw rather than as a part of a lack of fundamental values. The California psyche does not understand the universal activity of the propagation and preservation of the species including its spiritual growth; consequently, it has little regard for the family or the patriarchal structure necessary to maintain it.

Its laws focus on civil arrangements rather than spiritual values. It promotes the sameness of sex and homosexual unions while simultaneously enacting laws that breakdown male authority in the home thus destroying the family. A manifestation of this disregard for family is reflected in the soaring rate of unwed motherhood in California. It is reflected in the pregnancy of unwed congresswoman Linda Sanchez. The flaunting of female independence by becoming unwed mothers creates a class of males that will be underachievers and potential gang members and prison inmates. California’s governor symbolizes its lack of gender understanding having played the role of a pregnant man in the movies. Those that have eyes, let them see.

While referring to the many material accomplishments of California such as its high tech companies, the film industry, and environmental leadership, Kotkin does not mention that California is the pornographic capital of the world. Thousands of women journey to that state each year to participate in pornographic movies and not for the money, for they act as interns or apprentices in order to build up a resume that certifies them as whores so they can perform in “adult” clubs around the country. I often wonder what that interpretation of “adult” has on our youth.

There has never been a society that did not implode once men lost their authority. There has never been a society that did not sink into moral decadence once the ethics created by men was removed. There has never been a society that long prospered after it abandoned as its primary focus the natural activity of the propagation and preservation of the species. There has never been a society that has survived the destruction of the family.
As mentioned earlier, Joel Kotkin is a learned man and surely knows that the above statements are true, yet he does not address the fundamental unseen issues that have led to the decline and eventual demise of California in particular and to our nation and the entire Western world in general.

Mr. Kotkin, like so many of his contemporaries, attributes changes in societal activity and performance to the institutions that Western man has established. He writes about political parties, educational systems, economic developments, religious organizations, social strata, and financial policies. His works are easy to read and follow, but they serve more as historical perspectives rather than studies of cause and effect. Unfortunately this approach is the norm of Western society. Women complain about what is wrong; men are expected to take action. Since men have been neutered in our society everybody writes and talks about its problems and no one offers solutions. The hope is that somehow institutions will fix things. If nothing works, the institution of last resort—the government—is called upon to “do something.”

We live in a society incapable of resolving its problems. No matter what the problem, it never goes away; it gets talked about and talked about as it festers and grows. The thinking used to create a problem cannot be used to resolve that problem. Western feminine materialistic thinking has created its problems; it cannot resolve them. Only a change in thinking will bring about the action necessary to bring about resolution.

The change in thinking necessary in Western society requires an understanding of the universal principle of gender and a change in focus from maximum freedom for self-indulgence and self-aggrandizement to a life dedicated to the propagation and preservation of the species. From this objective ethics will develop that will create the moral atmosphere conducive to mental, physical and spiritual growth.

California and the Western world put their faith in matters material. When the material world became unraveled, whether in the form of the bursting of the high tech and real estate bubbles or the collapse of the stock market, society began to decline. What needs to be understood is that society did not decline because of the collapse of the material entities, but that the material entities collapsed because of a lack of ethical standards and moral behavior.

Civilizations die when they lose their virility and ethics. Only men are virile. Only men develop ethics. No men—no virility. No men—no ethics. No virility and ethics—no society.

It’s time for a change in thinking, not only in California but also throughout the Western world.

E.G.

THE NOOSE TIGHTENS

2009-03-01T17:04:00.000-08:00

Our federal government has a noose around the neck of individual responsibility and authority of society. The actions of the present government taken before and immediately after its inauguration have tightened this noose considerably. It has taken overt and covert steps to remove any vestiges of patriarchy thus leaving the functioning of society completely dependent upon government fiat.

Prior to the inauguration this administration had already begun its contribution to the continued attack on family by choosing Senator Joe Biden as Vice President. The ostensible reason for the selection of Senator Joe Biden was because of his foreign policy experience, which other than his time as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee was rather limited. He does however, have a significant credential towards governmental control of the family in his authorship of the Violence Against Women Act. This act removed familial authority from the male and put it in the hands of the government making it the arbiter of relationships between men and women living together. That action destroyed the family; it also increased the prison population and caused more children to live in a home without a father present.

President Obama’s first legislative act signed into law the Landbetter Act, which calls for equal pay for women. This act serves as intrusion by government into the running of private business. As a former business owner I can say that most business owners pay people according to what they contribute to the enterprise, they really don’t care about sex, race, ethnicity, or religion. Those few who have genuine prejudices ultimately pay the price in reduced productivity.

Women challenge how anyone can oppose violence to women. People are not opposed to violence against women; they are opposed to the Violence Against Women Act, which aside from not taking into consideration the fact that it does take two to tango, this law destroys the family, and makes children wards of the State. It is a cleverly named law that hides its sinister intent and with its specific gender designation, it along with the Landbetter Act creates a schism between men and women further destroying any remaining natural gender (patriarchal) relationships and solidifying the power of the government over both sexes.

A third step towards complete government control is the effort to enact universal health care, which has nothing to do with health just as the much-heralded Hillary Clinton Health Care Plan had nothing to do with health. Her plan had to do with sickness and how to pay for it, and that in essence is all that the present administration’s proposals deal with. I am a veteran and receive care at Veteran’s Administration hospitals, which I find to be reasonably good care. However, I am always defending myself against their attempts to have me take flu shots, medication, or invasive examinations. If universal health care becomes enacted people will either do what the government says or they won’t be treated.

Another step in the governments move towards complete control of all aspects of societal activity is its increased influence in education. The Los Angeles Times reported, “The government proposes to take on a greatly expanded role in making college affordable and in ensuring that students earn degrees or credentials. Pell Grants would be tied to inflation for the first time since their inception, providing annual raises for recipients. The grant program also would be turned into an entitlement program with guaranteed funding, like Social Security or Medicare. The government proposes to take on a greatly expanded role in making college affordable and in ensuring that students earn degrees or credentials.”

The government desires to take on this expanded role in education so that it can influence the thinking of greater numbers of people and also keep them in debt to the government. It conducts a combination mind control and financial control operation. By eliminating family and at the same time making the government the provider of all services it cultivates in people the belief that all issues must be resolved through governmental action.

The scope of the government’s efforts to destroy family and entrench its powers cannot be over-estmated The activities mentioned here have to do with the efforts of our new administration, which has been in office a little over a month. However, there are those who feel these efforts to further destroy the famiy were manifested the day after the present administratin came to power. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, described those policies on his Web site the day after the inauguration. “Minutes after Obama took the oath of office, the transfer of power was made complete on the White House Web site. The page, once home to a host of family values, now welcomes an extreme collection of anti-life, anti-woman, and anti-family agendas. Under the caption "civil rights," Obama pledges to fight for nationwide civil unions [for homosexual partners], repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, homosexual adoption, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, expanded "hate crimes," and over 1,100 costly same-sex benefits. He promises to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" [in the military] as well as block a federal amendment to preserve marriage. In exchange for the support of groups like Planned Parenthood, the abortion business is also due for a rich payoff from the 44th president, including his support of abortion-on-demand, more funding for "family planning" programs, embryonic stem cell experiments, and tax-funded abortion.”

Whether Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative, the march of the government to greater control of our lives continues, and the present economic crises serves as a diversion that enables it through the enactment of seemingly innocuous legislation, to strengthen its hold on all aspects of our lives

The noose around our individual initiative continues to tighten. What I find particularly disturbing is the willingness of a large part of the population to have this noose around them. It gives them a sense of security. The way to enslave people is to get them to want to be enslaved and there are many who clamor for this enslavement whether by calling for universal health care, universal aid to education, for surveilance cameras, or for an infinite number of laws to protect them.

We are very close to the establishment of complete tyranny. When that happens essays such as this will not be permitted on the internet or anywhere else. The time to step forward and do something to protect yourself and those who think as you do has arrived.

It has been said that when people hurt enough they start to look for change, but I wonder if by the time they desire to make change from government control the noose will be so tight that it will be impossible to get out of it. What seems more likely is that the majority will have been so indoctrinated that they not only won’t hate their oppressors—they will love them. They will be comfortable in the noose.

Now is the time to stand up and start living the patriarchal life as best as you understand it and as best as you can. The longer you wait the tighter the noose will become.

E.G.

A TIME FOR RE-EVALUATION

2009-02-25T18:59:00.001-08:00

As I skimmed through the 2009 Personal Finance Issue of US News & World Report and reflected on the disproportionate emphasis placed on matters material by the media, all levels of government, and our societal institutions I became motivated to write this essay on the true needs of people.

Contrary to the hype we receive from the various institutions of our society, the main interest and requirement of people does not evolve around money and things. When people pray to a higher power or go to fortunetellers, astrologers, or seers of various sorts they have three to four basic concerns. These are romance, health, and finance. Career also becomes an area of concern but it usually represents an extension of finance, and the finance serves as a means of material security. People want to experience health, love, and security. They have simple desires, which the extended family usually provided for except in cases of war and/or natural disaster; even then the feeling that “we are all in this together” provided a sense of security.

In patriarchal societies, women awoke in the morning in a safe and secure environment. They knew the men provided the protection they needed and the means for them to go about their business of nurturing. The men did the hunting, fishing, and farming necessary to provide the means for women to nurture, and provided for their safety as well, whether from predatory animals or incursions from a hostile tribe.

Women function well in a secure environment. It enables them to express their nurturing love in all its forms. It relaxes them and enables them to carry out their womanly functions with confidence, warmth, and joy. Women of patriarchal societies do not suffer from depression or commit suicide, and their bodies are relatively free of disease.

Men of patriarchal societies express joy and happiness as well. What greater joy is there to a man than living in a home filled with the aura of a caring loving woman?

Children raised in these societies have a sense of belongingness, which gives them self-confidence and a sense of responsibility to the larger social order. They also learn ethics and the natural moral behavior that ensues from these ethics.

Compare this picture of tranquility, security, togetherness, and harmony to the chaotic, insecure, lonely, and dissonant environment in which Western men and women live. Everything we do is based upon monetary decisions because family has been taken away from us. This focus on matters material cannot provide the security and warmth of the family and tribe.

Our government, media, and present society in general have a preoccupation with matters material and an almost complete disregard for the basic essentials of living and quality of life. Every human need becomes quantified and reduced to a purchasable material quantity. People no longer experience joy; instead they have temporary ecstasies provided by various forms of escapism.

None of the political candidates during the primaries or presidential campaigns focused on or even mentioned family. In all the hoopla about the activities of the President since the inauguration nothing has been mentioned about family. Even with health care—which is really sick care—the emphasis is on the amount of money available to cover sick costs, not wellness.

Western society has never experienced the level of illness that now runs rampant among all its social strata. Chronic illness now affects 25% of the population, diabetes occurs at younger and younger ages, obesity among children continues to increase, respiratory illness has become the norm, 300,000 new cases of breast cancer occur each year, and the number one health issue of the English speaking world is mental illness. And we call those areas of the world that still practice patriarchy, primitive. We have lost all perspective.

This perspective needs to be addressed, for it lies at the very core of the problems of Western society. A single entity created this universe and we generally refer to this entity as God although that word comes from the Europeans or Indo-Europeans. Mystics sometimes use the term “the great absolute” when referring to the single creator. Whichever way a person refers to this entity, it exists and is the cause behind all causes.

God created a perfect universe and gave instructions through various prophets on all continents since the beginning of time on how to live in this universe and be in harmony with it. There is a way to live in it. I will capitalize Way to denote it as a particular entity. The Tao means the Way. Jesus said, “I am the truth, the light, and the Way.” When we live in the Way as best as we understand it and are capable of, we experience harmony, love, contentment and spiritual growth.

What we call primitive people lived in the Way. They had a balance between the material and spiritual world. They lived in harmony with nature, but knew all things came from the unseen spirit. They lived in harmony with each other. Patriarchy provides the structure for this harmony. It is the structure of the universe. It is an expression of the natural relationship and balance of gender. Western thought on the other hand is oblivious to the Way and therefore not in harmony with it.

Western thought only addresses the material world. It has little understanding of things unseen. It is feminine and materialistic. It is unbalanced. It does not acknowledge what it cannot see. It takes great pride in the scientific approach and use of empirical data, which one day I am confident will be regarded as an extremely unsuccessful attempt to access the truth.

Western thought has made a god of materialism. It believes it can created better food than God did, and that it can heal better than God can. Just look at the aberrations known as the American Medical Association and the American Pharmaceutical Association. It believes it creates abundance, not realizing that all abundance comes from God. It is not in harmony with anything and in disharmony with everything. Western thought has caused the pollution of the earth, and its inhabitants. All its political isms have failed.

Now as the economy continues to falter we hear continuous reports of the high priests in Washington calling upon the god of materialism to save us. The process of saving us will take away our every freedom.

It’s time for a re-evaluation, either men rule or the State rules. The rule of the State leads to tyranny. The rule of men—which is patriarchy—leads to health, love, and security.

E.G.

A SENSE OF DIRECTION

2009-02-19T05:30:00.000-08:00

I do ballroom dancing and enjoy dancing with inexperienced dancers as well as the experienced, as the former give me the opportunity to utilize my teaching ability. One of the mantras I recite to the learners is, “Back on the right and forward on the left.” Not infrequently I have to stop to explain which is the right and left side. Women have difficulty relating to left and right, and also to North, South, East, and West. A woman’s difficulty with direction is well known and the general attitude is “So what?” This essay will deal with the “So what.”

First, let’s look at how much of daily activity depends on an understanding of left and right. We turn to the left or to the right when we walk out the door of the buildings we reside in. We use even numbers on the left-hand pages of a book and odd numbers on the right-hand pages. Newspaper articles are designated left and right. On highways we pass in the left lane, and get off using the right lane. At the doctors office we explain of pain we have in our left ear or right knee, left foot or right eye. Athletic equipment is designed for left handed players and right handed players. There are left tackles, right guards, and left fielders. Boats and ships have left sides (port sides) and right sides (starboard sides). We look for things in the right side of a closet, and the left side of a storage bin. Refrigerators have left opening doors and right opening doors. The number of daily activities depending on right and left designations borders on infinity.

North, South, East and West as designations influence all that we do. Streets are designated as running East and West, and North and South. We speak of the northbound lane of a highway or the southbound direction of an Avenue. We designate the side of mountains by the north face or south face. Subway and elevated lines are designated northbound or westbound. We speak of the southward flow of a river or the northward migration of ducks.

Women have difficulty with these designations of direction and others that will be mentioned because they cannot be seen. Not only are they not seeable—they do not exist. They are conceptual designations of men. Uptown and downtown fall into this classification, as do latitude and longitude. They do not exist. All of the movement of people throughout the world is dependent upon the conceptual designations of direction that men have created. That’s something for both men and women to reflect upon.

Now let’s take our thinking to a deeper level. Not only is all movement predicated on the unseen, but the rate of movement is also predicated on conceptual designations. There is no such thing as a minute or hour. They are arbitrary conceptual designations of the movement of the earth on its axis. Clocks are measures of conceptual thinking. The international dateline does not exist—neither do time zones.

Let’s go still deeper, all that we manufacture is according to conceptual designations that do not exist. There is no such entity as an inch or millimeter, gallon or liter, foot, or yard. There is no such entity as a mile, a degree of movement on a circle. All direction, movement, and product of this world are predicated upon the unseen conceptual designations of men.

The dependence of all earthly activity on the conceptual thinking of men is an example of the functioning of the universal principle of gender. The masculine principle provides the environment and means for the feminine principle to bring life into this world and nurture it. The feminine principle produces everything in accordance with the unseen parameters of the masculine principle. Men deal with what is unseen in order for the seen to function.

We tend to take for granted the roads, highways, buildings, and products of society. We act as though they were always here. They weren’t. They came into being as a result of the conceptual thinking of men. The attitude of “We don’t need men anymore” is predicated on ignorance.

There is another area of male conceptual thinking that most significantly affects society.

All ethics and the morals that are derived from them come from the conceptual thinking of men. Virtue chastity, honor, loyalty, and general rectitude come from the unseen standards of men. These standards came about as a result of the purpose of propagating and preserving the species. The enemy of our society had to disenfranchise men in order to brake down its moral structure. Removing the authority of men destroyed the family and the conceptual thinking within it that provided the standards for moral behavior. The enemy promotes the mantra “there is no right and wrong,” and replaces ethical standards with laws that define legal and illegal.

Just as the conceptual thinking of men provided the environment for the activity of the physical world, the conceptual thinking of men also provides the spiritual, ethical and moral environment for the development of people.

All forms of government other than patriarchy are parasitic institutions that feed off the output of others. The huge federal economic stimulus prepared by the government is for it own survival and control. People can survive a recession and depression. They can survive famine. They have done so before. The government can’t. It has grown too large. It needs tax revenue to survive. It must pump up the economy and in the process further destroy the environment.

We have a monster on our hands in Washington and in the nations of most of the world. That monster is destroying our lives. In the end it will destroy itself. That time is coming soon. For those who still think we don’t need men any more, when the time of destruction is upon us the following words of Isaiah 4:1 will be fulfilled: “Then on that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, We will eat our own bread and wear our own clothes if only we may be called by your name.”

Just as the conceptual thinking of God created the physical universe, the conceptual thinking of man created the material world in which we live.

I trust that the “So what” of the opening paragraph has been answered.

E.G.

A SENSE OF PURPOSE

2009-02-15T15:29:00.001-08:00

As I review the societal landscape I see in its every activity a passiveness and lack of purpose. Life has become meaningless. Traditional practices, customs, and mores have become nothing more than empty rituals that gradually fade into oblivion.

Elders are no longer venerated; parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and other extended family members receive no special recognition and little respect, for they have been removed from any meaningful influence regarding the training and development of the young. Women no longer respect men and men no longer respect women, for their natural purpose has been suppressed.

Lacking purpose the only meaningful activity becomes self-indulgence. People who stand in the way of the attainment or expression of self-gratification become the enemy, regardless of their age or gender. When purposelessness engulfs a society its members become selfish and disrespectful; they develop a “dog eat dog” mentality, which requires an even stronger government to maintain order.

People seek escape from this un-natural existence in the form of entertainment, sports, substance abuse, gambling, and pornography. This entertainment no longer has meaning and has become a vehicle for the expression of more violent behavior and debauchery.

The purposeless society cannot endure; it will self-destruct. A purposeless society is an oxymoron. At best it is a temporary phenomenon.

Whether in the spiritual realm or material realm, purposelessness cannot endure. I will first address the concept of purposelessness in matters spiritual. Some of the new-age gurus preach of a society in which we will have made union with God and all conflict will have ceased. One sect established by such a guru holds that procreation will occur without sexual union and that desire and lust will have ceased to exist. I asked a member of such a sect what function the male would have in that society. She did not answer my question. She couldn’t. If males provide the environment and means for females to bring forth life and nurture it, what possible role could man have in a society in which God has provided everything and there is no purpose? Man would not exist in such a society. Nor would woman, for she would not have anything to do. That society is purposeless. After union with God is attained, there no longer is a purpose or a reason for living in the material world.

The difficulty with Western thought in addressing this spiritual situation is that it can only comprehend it within the limited confines of the space-time paradigm, and spirituality does not fit in there. However, whatever understanding we have of spiritual perfection, we will no longer exist in the material world once it is attained, for the purpose of human existence will have been achieved.

Before proceeding, it is well to reflect that when the physical universe was created, gender came into being. Adam represented the masculine principle, which gave direction to the world in its process of fulfilling the divine purpose of propagating and preserving the species on its journey of spiritual growth.

Just as ultimate spiritual attainment removes the need for the male, the reverse is also true. As the male is removed from society it degenerates, implodes, and then ceases to exist. Whether we have spiritual attainment or materialistic degeneration, there is no place for the male in either activity. In the former he evolved out of his position and in the latter he was removed from it.

No males—no purpose. No purpose—no society.

In the realm of human existence there are very few at the extremes—those that attain union with God or those that self destruct—but most of society tends to be somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, depending upon the virility and purpose of its males. Since males in Western society are impotent and lacking in direction and vitality, it is only natural that Western society is collapsing.

Whether or not one believes in the prophecy of the Mayans, Nostradamus, Edgar Casey, Revelations, the end times, or prophets such as Isaiah and Jeremiah, society has always been warned of the degeneration that takes place with the decline of the masculine influence. It happened, in ancient Israel, Greece, Rome, Spain, and now throughout the Western world. The words of the prophets are rarely heeded, and the lesson of history is that no one learns from it.

In order for a society to have purpose, or at least the ability to strive for goals, it must have virility. It must have the energy to fulfill its aspirations. Virility and the assertive action that it generates come form the masculine principle—from the male of the species.

No males—no virility. No virility—no action. No action—no accomplishment.

The neutering of the male in Western society has developed into a huge evil born of ignorance. It is leading to the demise of society and there is no “fixing” this demise. The health and well-being of men, women and children has never been in a worse state. Like an illness that must run its course before health is restored, the genderless thinking of Western society will wash away upon its collapse as the people face the issue of their very survival. That day is rapidly nearing.

We can stand by and do nothing, or we can start to prepare for that eventuality now. Those men and women who have supported Men’s Action from the beginning might now consider moving forward to another level of activity. While we all have the demands of our daily existence on our available time, talent, and treasures, these demands are more apparent than real. Jesus told the man who would follow him but had a funeral to attend to first, to “Let the dead bury the dead.” The meaning of that response is that most of the world is spiritually dead and let them care for one another. And another also said, Lord, I will follow thee; but let me first go bid them farewell, which are at home at my house. And Jesus said unto him, “No man, having put his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.”

The time is at hand for those who are awake, to act, and for those who can see, to move. No institution will bring about change; it will be made by those who are awakening and emerging from the comatose state in which society is engulfed.

Society will soon be forced to re-establish its purpose and will require direction to attain that end. That purpose is the something for which to give up everything.

E.G.

NON-PRODUCTIVE CAREERS

2009-02-07T04:16:00.000-08:00

A review of career listings found in various locations on the internet and in print media reveals an increasing number of professions and occupations that have no purpose other than to compensate for the un-natural lifestyle that we lead. Careers such as urban planner, financial analyst, health services, human services, recreation worker, economist, government and public administration, agricultural and food scientist, and public safety, corrections and security, are all creations of Western society. Natural societies had no need of these careers.

Why do we need agricultural and food scientists? God made food and designed a certain way for it to grow and be harvested. God’s work cannot be improved upon. The abandoning of natural farming for modern productive efficiency destroys the natural balance of nature and requires the employ of scientists to figure out ways to produce food from an abused environment.

What do we need economists for? Productivity and the amassing of things material has become a fetish of modern society. God has given us freely all that we need. Paul said, “There is no single thing that you have not received.” What function do economists fulfill? They have generated a multitude of theories because they know nothing. Their predictions on economic growth are no better than guesswork.

Public safety, corrections, and security are only needed in a society lacking in ethics. Ethics come from the masculine principle and become imbued within society by family training. Jails did not exist in the Americas, Polynesia, or Africa before the arrival of Western man. Western nations all have huge penal and security systems to protect themselves from each other because they have destroyed the fundamental structure of humankind—the family.

Vocational activities such as occupational therapy, family counseling, childcare, elderly care, health care, investment counseling, legal services, social work, and drug and substance abuse treatments are all unique to Western society.

The un-natural activity of working at a job created the need for occupational therapy. Homemakers of old in all cultures didn’t need occupational therapy because they used all their bodily parts in the course of a days work. They lifted, carried, stirred, mended, scrubbed, ironed, peeled, laundered, and did a variety of other chores that exercised their entire bodies. Men, would plow, make fences, chop, hone, hunt, fish, and do a variety of other activities that would utilize all their muscles.

Jobs have people sit or stand in one position all day; they go through the same motions all day putting undo strain on their bodies. Their minds also become numb. They need physical therapy, mental therapy, and various supports for their bodies. Jobs are unnatural. People were not created to have jobs. They were designed to do whatever was necessary to propagate and preserve the species. In natural societies, if a child was sick and a mother had to go through the night without sleep taking care of it, that was her responsibility. If a man went on the hunt for food in dangerous terrain at the risk of losing life or limb, that was his responsibility. Men and women did what was necessary to preserve the family and tribe; they did not have jobs. Work is good; jobs are bad.

Jobs have become necessary in order to obtain money so that the essentials of life can be obtained, essentials that man once provided for himself before all the resources around him became “owned.” Jobs are demeaning, dangerous, and life threatening. Jobs are economic slavery. Yet the slaves today are begging the government for more jobs, so indoctrinated have they become to their condition of servitude.

Family counseling represents another vocation brought about by the aberration of Western society. Young college graduates certified as social workers call upon women with children and tell them how to be good mothers and maybe wives. These functions were normally learned from grandmothers and great-grandmothers, aunts, sisters, and cousins. Learning how to become a good wife and mother is not obtained from a book; it comes from observing how others do it. Family provides the environment for that education to take place. With the destruction of the family the center of learning for parenthood disappeared and family counseling was created.

Space does not permit going through each and every career and occupation developed as a direct result of the un-natural practices of Western society. However, the examples given will hopefully serve as a catalyst to explore all that we do that has no direct contribution to our well-being. Living in such a manner leads to stress, anxiety, angst, and unhappiness. It leads to spiritual as well as material poverty.

Do you want to continue living in this manner knowing that conditions will continue to worsen; or do you want to learn more about these issues and perhaps become involved with others who have similar concerns? You can receive these essays on a regular basis at no charge by clicking the subscribe button under my picture on www.mensaction.net. You can also subscribe to my videos at no cost through youtube.com. Should you become further interested and want to help share the word you can invest in my book and information booklets through paypal.com on the Men’s Action website.

Getting back to the conclusion of this essay, an increasing amount of our labor goes to support the payment of the consequences of the un-natural lifestyle that we have developed. You might want to refer to my extensive essay entitled, The Fixit Society, or, to learn more of the conditioning we receive for this un-natural lifestyle you can review Cubists. Each year we have to work harder to maintain the lifestyle we had the previous year because an increasing amount of what we earn goes to support non-productive activities and a growing government.

Government continues to expand its control into every aspect of our lives through overt and covert activities. The printing of money to stimulate the economy will result in inflation that will erode the value of social security benefits and retirement income. Ultimately we will all become wards of the state. It will decide on our health care, housing, education, recreation, and perhaps the length of our lives as well. In the process it will create more non-productive jobs necessary to for the administration of our control. You can do nothing and await the furtherance of these conditions, which are already upon us, or you can decide to get together with others and start to develop a way of life outside of the system. Men’s Action offers you a vehicle to do the latter.

E.G.

TYRANNY IS CLOSE AT HAND

2009-02-01T02:37:00.001-08:00

The first bill President Obama signed into law— the Ledbetter Wage Discrimination bill—focused on equal pay for women, which in essence erases any difference between men and women in the workplace. This signing supplements the legislation introduced by and passed during Vice President Biden’s time in the Senate called the Violence Against Women Act, which legally eliminated any difference between men and women in the home and made the government the sole arbiter. It also put more men in jail and had more children reared without a father. These two men will continue the government’s march towards a genderless and Godless society proposed at the International Conference on Women held in Beijing, China in 1995. The much-heralded change in this new administration will not come about; instead it will continue the usurpation of manly authority and individual judgment of its predecessors.

President Obama’s comments on 18 billion dollars worth of bonuses given on Wall Street this past year reflects the government’s intrusion into the details of business operations as well. We have a government that has extended its tentacles into the home, the workplace, and into business operations. Its present grip on healthcare and education will be tightened in the near future.

As I see the effects of Western man’s abdication of his natural authority I am reminded of the warning contained in the Mahabarata, which states, “Woe unto all when the tiara rules before the crown.” Mohammed said in one of his hadiths, “A nation that gives its affairs to women will never be successful.”

As I have said many times there are only two types of governance available, the rule of men or the rule of the State. When men become neutered the State takes over all functions of societal activity and then evolves into a tyranny.

Plato forecast these conditions in the Republic as he described the descent of democracy into tyranny. He said that as the time for tyranny approached, “There would come impeachments, and judgments, and trials of one another.” Sound familiar?

He also said, “The people have some champion who they set over them and nurse to greatness.” Sound familiar?

We stand at the threshold of tyranny. The proper description is sit. That’s the position of Western man, he sits and does nothing and hopes that his institutions will take care of things, little realizing that his dependency on institutions led to his emasculation. He seems unable to do anything about anything anymore. He’s been neutered. How sad; especially for the women who now have only the state to turn to for their well-being.

On the home page of the Men’s Action website I indicate that the World Trade Center had represented the phallic symbol of America, which was replaced by a large vagina, the new symbol for America. The New York papers had headlines for the last two years asking why there was no erection at ground zero. Vaginas do not get erections. And there is no other source to bring about action. This is the land of Viagra. As one women said to me, “We can’t get it up anymore.” How sad.

Barbara Hand Clow, astrologer and cosmic historian states. “Most cultural collapses have come from apathy and lack of energy.” The masculine principle supplies energy, it’s called virility. No men—no virility. No virility—no action. How sad.

Western man has gone through a modern neutering. Instead of being physically castrated as in the days of the eunuchs his castration now takes place by raising him in a home without a father, educating him with girls and told that there are no gender differences, sending him into a work place where he must work equally with women, be indoctrinated that marriage is passé, and be subjected to one-sided and onerous sexual harassment and sexual abuse laws. If he survives that indoctrination and still decides to get married he learns that he is not the head of the family, that the children belong to the state and that separation and child custody arrangements can be granted at the whim of the courts. How sad.

We live in a society of the neutered male, of the modern eunuch. Now that he has become completely passive he hopes that his institutions will somehow save him. If we could only go back to the original constitution, back to the tenets of this or that religion, back to conservatism or true liberalism, or some political philosophy that has never worked. He hopes that somehow these institutions will make change while he sits. How sad.

He complains a lot, he even sends letters to officials to so something about some particular wrong, but never about the underlying cause. He can’t see the underlying cause, and on the rare occasions in which he can, he is unable to do anything about it.
His women suffer from depression, and increased rates of breast and cervical cancer; his daughters no longer have any desire to become wives and mothers and engage in all sorts of debauchery which is now labeled sexual liberation and independence; he sees his sons developing into the most violent boys in the world; he sees his brothers rotting away in cages in the penal system for unjust accusations regarding sexual molestation, spousal abuse, and child support. Yet, he does nothing. He’s been neutered. He sits. It’s all over. The end of Western society is at hand. No one can save it.

Then what are the few who see the cause of this collapse to do? They can become active with Men’s Action to Rebuild Society, a spiritually based and gender oriented organization with a Mission Statement that calls for fostering a more natural way of life for humankind. It supports family and the patriarchal way of life necessary to sustain it. Men’s action has a message, and defines the purpose of human existence.

Men’s action not only provides a voice but also serves as a vehicle for change. It can provide male enlightenment and empowerment seminars. It can provide seminars for women as well. It can provide home economics programs. It can offer low cost or free services of holistic health practitioners. It can establish marriage contracts that are outside of the purview of the government. It can re-pioneer family values and the security and spiritual growth they bring.

Most of all Men’s Action offers hope. Hope for a life of meaning and purpose. A life of human dignity. A life of dedication to the family, tribe, and human race. A life of belongingness, love, care, and security. A life of men and women who know their purpose in this earthly visit and do their best to fulfill it. A life outside of the reaches of the State. And lastly, Men’s Action offers the opportunity to plant the seeds for a new era of spiritual growth after the demise of this age of materialism.

Becoming active requires stepping up to the plate and giving of one’s time, talents and treasures, as one is able to. We charge no dues and only ask that you invest in a copy of Dear Brothers and Sisters: Gender and Its Responsibility, along with a set of information booklets. If you can’t make that small investment then you are not ready to become active with Men’s Action. To those who have given and continue to give their support—and you know who you are—I consider you as precious as jewels. You have been with us from the start when there was nothing. To the women who have given generously of their support, which is an expression of your nurturing nature, I am grateful and look forward to you playing a bigger role in our outreach.

To all who have not yet taken steps to become involved with Men’s Action, now is the time. Do not become attached to anything that you do or own; you won’t be doing it or owning it much longer. The time to act is now. This moment. Order a book and set of booklets, subscribe to our website, send me an Email, and get involved. Assert your manhood and womanhood. Now. The State tyranny is readying itself for the throne.

E.G.

CHOOSING YOUR SIDE

2009-01-26T08:16:00.000-08:00

My essay Elimination of the Family received an excellent response world wide, as did others that recently addressed family and the well-being of society. This response indicates an increased awareness on the part of a small but growing minority of people worldwide that something fundamental has gone wrong with society. They have begun to realize that conditions will force them to choose sides between those who believe in surrendering their lives to the government, and those who prefer to maintain responsibility for their own well-being.

With each passing day Western governments cement their control over the people by enacting onerous laws that make people completely dependent upon an omnipotent and omnipresent ruling structure.

One of the many devious methods they use to maintain their hold on the populous is to pass laws that seemingly increase justice and fairness to all, such as anti-discrimination laws against race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and gender. However, the effect of these laws eliminates an ethical basis for society to live by; it also punishes those who promote such values. A Canadian Roman Catholic Priest who was accused of committing a hate crime against homosexuals because he quoted form the Bible represents the invasive and constricting effects of government laws. I don’t think it is far-fetched that I could be accused of committing a hate crime because I espouse patriarchy and the rule of men. I could probably be accused of a hate crime because I have the temerity to preach that men and women are different.

We have reached the point where our government considers itself the establisher and administrator of all societal values. I challenge that position. However, before pursuing that challenge I want o make my personal position regarding humankind clear.

I consider every man and woman to be my brother and my sister, my son and my daughter. Every is an all-inclusive word and does not require further elaboration. However, loving every human being does not mean that every human being can fit into any role in society. Equal worth does not mean sameness. Every organization has its requirements and its standards. All drug users are my brothers and sisters, but I would not want them in key positions in my organization.

Walt Whitman expressed this dichotomy of thought in his Song of the Open Road, in which he states….”The diseased, the illiterate person are not denied; the beggar, the drunkard, the escaped youth; are all included in society.” But then later he states, ..”None may come to the trial till he or she bring courage and health, come not here if you have already spent the best of yourself, no diseased person, no rum-drinker or venereal taint is permitted here.” His words may seem to be a contradiction; he accepts all of life, but those who travel with him must be of a certain standard.

Jesus administered to the wine imbibers and all manner of social outcasts and misfits; however, his inner circle of disciples was made up of intelligent and spiritually tutored men. He had his standards.

So we as a society must have our standards. While none are denied, only those who understand and adhere to the standards will lead.

The issue that I take with the government and its proponents is that they have no standards; they offer rights, which only they can bestow. They have made unlimited self-gratification the objective of society. I believe Ethical values need to be re-established, and that the propagation and preservation of the species serves as a primary determinant of ethics.

It is on this point that you will choose your side. You either work for the propagation and preservation of the species in a structure administered by men called patriarchy, or you support laws that preserve the right to equal self-indulgence for all and is administered by the state. All political systems, which by the way came from Europe, have failed. Therefore, choosing government is choosing failure. Patriarchy on the other hand, is the natural structure of the universe and the natural structure for humankind. It has been with us since the beginning of time.

If you choose to work for the propagation and preservation of the species you will associate with those people whose values and temperament support that objective; they will be drawn to you and you to them.

This is the issue.

Men make ethics that govern moral behavior; men set standards; men determine what is good for the preservation of the race. Women bring life into this world and nurture it. That’s our partnership. The value to society depends upon people’s ability to contribute to the propagation and preservations of the species including its spiritual growth.

The time has come to make your choice; will you help to draw the battle line, or will you submit to the growing tyranny?

E.G.

ELIMINATION OF THE FAMILY

2009-01-22T11:32:00.000-08:00

All groupings have an authority from which all direction emanates.

This truism applies to insects, fish, flora, mammals, and humans. It also applies to what we refer to as inanimate life such as planets and suns, and atoms and molecules.

All organizations such as clubs, teams, businesses, and religions have their authoritative heads. Community, fraternal, educational, governmental, and social groupings have their top authority. This authority might be elected, appointed, inherited or just agreed upon by its members and might be called, chief, chairman, president, manger, coach, captain, priest, rabbi, imam, pastor, or leader.

Every grouping contains a directing influence that guides it to its collective destination, or at the least, helps to preserve it. This structure and activity is a manifestation of the universal principle of gender; the assertive masculine influence providing the environment and direction for the receptive feminine entity. No action can take place in the universe without the interplay of gender.

The largest celestial groupings known as galaxies consist of millions of stars and planets held together gravitationally and moving collectively in the same direction through space. A subcomponent of a galaxy is a solar system. All the planets within the system move in the same direction as the Sun and are completely under its control. In the atom the electrons—the feminine principle of electricity—rotate about the nucleus. From the smallest atom to the largest galaxy the unseen power of the masculine principle provides the direction and structure of the grouping.

Every flock of chickens has a rooster at its head and every gaggle of geese has its gander. Every herd of deer and cows has it stag or bull to lead it. The male lion heads the pride. No group can survive without a head, leader, or final authority. We all know this.

Why then has society removed the head of the family?

There are those who say that the family has become obsolete. It hasn’t become obsolete; it has been eliminated. Removing the man as its head had the same effect as removing the Sun from the solar system, it would collapse and cease to be. We have removed the man, family has collapsed and ceased be. We have produced a generation that believes in government as the provider of its well-being. It has no choice; the family has been eliminated.

The elimination of the family has been accepted on a national basis. None of the presidential candidates mentioned family in presidential primaries, neither party mentioned it in their platforms, and the inaugural address made no mention of it. The psyche of the nation no longer focuses on family.

The philosophy of Plato—which called for the turning over of children to the state—has now become a reality. Mothers actually brag at how early they have entered their children into pre school programs. We insist on schools feeding our children instead of parents preparing their lunches at home. We have eliminated home taught ethics and the resultant moral behavior and substituted it with after school indoctrination of legal and illegal. We have become a nation of automaton workers and programmed consumers—jackasses and she-asses on the treadmill of production—while the government controls every aspect of our lives. We brag about that condition as though it were an enlightened way of life.

We ask the government to provide health care, economic well-being, and educational opportunities. Government has been made into a God upon whom our very lives depend.
Accordingly, we worship this God and the priesthood that carries out its instructions.

Let me be clear—the family has been destroyed by ignorance of the universal principle of gender. No amount of legislation or government tinkering can re-establish the family as a viable grouping. Government destroyed the family; how could it possibly re-establish it? Re-establishment of the family can only occur by working outside of the government, outside of the system, and by realizing that a family must have its head and that head is man.

The function of all life is to propagate and preserve itself so that we can grow spiritually. The masculine principle provides the environment and the means for the feminine principle to bring forth life and nurture it. It does this through organization, structure, and ethics. The traits and characteristics of each gender become the attributes that enable the propagation and preservation of the species.

Family is an organization. Like all organizations it requires leadership. The male is designed for that role. There is no substitute.

If you understand that family is the only viable structure for human kind and want to do something about it, then become involved in Men’s Action. We have a message. We understand the universal principle of gender and know that society can only function properly with the natural interplay of gender called patriarchy. Patriarchy is family.

Our mission statement: To Foster a Natural Way of Life for Humankind, is patriarchy.

Men make families. The state makes slaves. You have two options and one choice. Which will it be, the rule of men or the rule of the state?

E.G.

THE COMING CRIME WAVE

2009-01-18T05:35:00.000-08:00

Government statistics indicate that crime has fallen in the aggregate and in most categories over the last 20 years. Why then does the installation of surveillance cameras increase at city, state, and federal governmental facilities? Why do increasing numbers of businesses employ security guards? Why do we see increased security measures at social functions? Why do some retail operations employ off duty policemen to supplement their security staffs?

Why with crime down does America have the highest incarceration rate in the world? A recent blog illustrated this fact in a more glaring way by stating that America has 5% of the world’s population and 25% of its prisoners—an alarming statistic and something you might want to reflect upon, especially if you have sons. Why does one man in six between the age of 18 and 30 have a relationship with the law?

The proponents of strong security measures, early apprehension, and lengthy prison sentences point to the reduced incidence of crime as resulting from these practices. By their reasoning if all men were put in prison crime would be eliminated entirely. We certainly seem to be moving in that direction.

A society that has low crime rates because of intense security measures and punitive procedures lives in fear. A fearful society is not a cooperative society, nor does it offer good will. It cannot nurture effectively either. We in America and all of Europe live in such a society. We say that we live in free democracies but in reality we live in fear of imprisonment, fines, firings, and/or loss of various privileges necessary to our functioning and survival. Western society leads the world in litigation, imprisonment, and various forms of punitive action.

What we call primitive societies have low crime rates without extensive laws and punitive procedures. They do this because they work in a spirit of cooperation for the common good. Such societies are not limited to the Polynesians, Africans, and those living in the remote corners of South America; they existed up in America as well, and until recent times. I had the opportunity to be part of such a society in my early youth when I stayed at what can be loosely described as a boarding house on the Hiris farm in Hawley, Pennsylvania.

Farmer and Mrs. Hiris were Austro-Hungarians who came to this country shortly after World War I and started a small farm and a big family. They had eleven children—six girls and five boys—and were so poor that the early children all wore dresses, and for two reasons. First, Mrs. Hiris made all the clothes, and it was easier to make dresses than pants and shirts. Secondly, it was also easier to raise and lower hems on dresses and let seams in and out than to do the same on pants. All the children were educated in a one-room schoolhouse a quarter of a mile up the road. The Hiris’s lived off the land and off the money Mr. Hiris earned from delivering coal in the winter.

One summer a friend stayed with the Hiris’s for a few weeks and had a very pleasant and relaxed vacation. His monetary offer was refused when it was time to leave, but he insisted on paying and asked if he could bring a friend the following year. This event started the Hiris’s in the summer boarding house business

By the time I started going to their modest boarding house most of the children had gotten married and left the farm; however, they all lived nearby and helped with the chores as necessary. I never heard the family members raise their voices. They worked in a spirit of cooperation. Everyone knew the activities necessary to maintain the homestead. The cows had to be milked, the pigs slopped, the horse groomed and led to water. Firewood had to be cut and stacked for the seemingly insatiable appetite of the wood-burning stove in the kitchen. The men knew how to hunt, fish, trap, and in general keep the farm safe from predators. Inside, the women churned the butter, prepared the food, mended the clothes, and cleaned the rooms; they also knew how to fire a rifle if the occasion demanded it.

These children were raised during the Great Depression. Their parents were uneducated immigrants, and they received no governmental assistance. Most of them obtained their academic learning from a schoolmarm who taught eight grades in one room. These children had no contact with the law, and when they grew up, did not use drugs, only imbibed alcohol occasionally and socially, and earned their own way through life.

The glue that held this family together was the common purpose of sustaining themselves. That activity created an ethical core that governed family behavior. They also had a religious affiliation though their church attendance was limited to the winter months.

As you read the above it might seem like a fairy tale, but the activity that I described represents the way most of the world once lived. It did not need laws, police, prisons, orphanages and old age homes.

Getting back to present society, another gruesome statistic indicates that America has the most violent boys in the world tends to support the need for early incarceration. Its proponents would argue that we had better get the most violent boys off the streets before they become the most violent men and really do us damage. Why does this land of material abundance produce the most violent boys in the world? What motivates them to commit crimes? What kind of value structure do they have?

In my previous essay Laws Instead of Ethics in Western Society, I pointed out that men of ethics build organizations, and that without ethics all organizations will collapse. 90% to 95% of the boys and men in prison came from broken homes; they were raised without fathers, they were not exposed to ethics, and they have few morals.

The prospects for crime are growing rapidly as we churn out more children raised without the benefit of a family environment. When these children roam the streets in a society that appears to be in the throes of severe economic collapse the potential for thievery and all sorts of crime will increase. The amoral environment in which they were raised, and the lack of identification with members of society, will have left them without regard for anyone.

The powers that influence our nation know what they have created by removing male authority, destroying the family, and making religion impotent. They have removed all ethics from society and reduced our behavior to what is legal and illegal. They have paved the way for a police state, which will be the only option left to maintain order and relative safety. Increased surveillance is part of the preparations for that eventuality.

If you want to combat that tend then start living the most patriarchal way possible. Patriarchy is family. All values begin with the family.

E.G.