Princess Diana

Princess Diana Death: Blogger Becomes Latest Victim!

2007-08-18T23:40:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Murder: Blogger Latest Victim In Conspiracy Plot?

In a startling new twist to the already very convoluted plot and mystery surrounding Princess Diana's death a blogger whose theme was none other than Princess Diana was killed while jogging by a hit and run vehicle! So far police are still collecting evidence from eyewitnesses.

At this point the police state there appears to be no evidence for premeditated murder or foul play as suggested by close friends and colleagues who opine that this was no mere hit and run!

Machinations Of A Paranoid Mind!
Please allow me to apologize for the inaccuracy of the above paragraph...it's nothing more than a fabrication! Here's the reason why...actually there is no good reason but I got the idea from a Newsweek edition ( I think it was Newsweek not Time magazine that had a totally false headline on the cover page that screamed "Terrorists Target School Buses!")

It was only when one read the article within that you got to know that the article was a "What If" and not a reality; I thought that was very irresponsible for a magazine of Newsweek's caliber to purposefully mislead the public in such a manner but you must admit it was very effective in attracting readers!

My goal with above "Police Investigation" above was to keep the faithful of this blog on hold until I could muster enough steam to explain why for all practical purposes there are not going to be any more sizzling posts highlighting why Princess Diana's death was more likely murder than accident!

Besides as a conspiracy theorist you betcha I believe such a hypothetical scenario could easily become a reality...So it's time for me to pass on the torch to someone else. This blog had gotten to the point where the next slew of articles would have been trespassing in very dangerous territory indeed!

If you really want to know more about what happened the night Princess Diana died there are a host of excellent books covering the conspiracy angle such as Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence (the book that ultimately opened my eyes to the vast number of inconsistencies and little publicized facts that made the assassination angle the most reasonable theory!)

And what's more, despite the fact that Princess Diana has been dead for 10 yrs with the anniversary of that event coming up on Aug 31, 2007, recent polls in England indicate that more than 40% of the public do not buy the accident scenario! Those numbers which appear to have climbed in recent years could make some of the plotters jittery even though there really isn't reason to be...

I doubt the truth will out any time soon!

There's far too much confusion surrounding Princess Diana's death (and ongoing covert obstruction to exposing the truth) for there to be any meaningful future investigation! But ultimately it was Google's decision to arrest the progress of this blog that has made me call it quits!

Although I do believe that Princess Diana was murdered I don't think that the truth will ever come out (at least not in the next 100 years) and this blog was an exercise in SEO to see if I could get it to page one of Google by the 31st!

I chose the subject matter because I knew as a conspiracy theorist (plausible conspiracies mind you) I would be impassioned enough to follow through! but once Google pulled the plug there really is little point in continuing:

**************************************************************************

Although this blog is substantially composed of material that can be found elsewhere on the internet its distinguishing factor is that I have aggregated in one location controversial material that lends strong credence to the notion that Princess Diana's death was not an accident but rather murder. As I just mentioned, more than 40% of the British public now believe that Diana's death was not a simple accident!

Google Banned Its Spider From Crawling This Blog
There is little point in me killing myself as this blog has been prevented from climbing up the search engine index pages anymore! And just when this 1-month-something blog had attained page 22 in Google's index for the keyword term Princess Diana! Once I got to page 22 on August 12th I knew that it was very very possible for me to make page one of Google for the same keyword by August 31st! but as I said, since Google manually restricted its googlebot from crawling this site as of August 14th my traffic has slowed considerably and my site is no longer going places on the search engine indexes...well at least on Google! (Read About It Here).

I will also take Google's Action (wrong as it is seeing that this is no spam site) as an omen...Let Sleeping Dogs Lie! If Google does "release this blog" from time to time I will be adding more content but of a far less controversial nature.

Here's The Post That Got Me "Banned"

BREAKING NEWS

Surprise...Surprise! Once the 31st August rolled in the Googlebot mysteriously started crawling this blog again! I guess I should be thankful for small mercies and it goes to prove I haven't lost my mind yet...or my head!

However more importantly I just stumbled across a video of an MI5 agent explicitly stating that Princess Diana was killed. Here's the link:

MI5 Agent Spilling The Beans That Princess Diana Was Murdered!

Princess Diana: Memorial Service Turns Into Circus

2007-08-18T19:42:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Memorial: Friends Are Out Enemies Are In!
Poor Princess Diana, even in death she can't get a break from the royals! The memorial service scheduled for the 10th anniversary of Princess Diana's death is fast becoming a platform to settle scores! Perhaps the biggest bone of contention is the fact that many of Princess Diana's closest friends have not been invited while several persons the late Princess detested have indeed made it on the guest list.

Somewhat surprisingly out of the 500 or so people thus far invited, many of them never even knew her at all! The fact that only 500 seats out of 700 will be filled is testament to the acrimonious atmosphere surrounding the impending memorial service.

The Enemy Within

1. Camilla Parker Bowles
The attendance of HRH the Duchess of Cornwall otherwise formerly and best known as Camilla Parker Bowles is the thorniest issue so far. Prince Charles is sticking to his guns and insisting that Camilla must and will be by his side at the service. Apparently Charles is the only person on planet earth who thinks that Camilla's attendance is a good thing…and he still harbors hopes of being King one day!

The Queen wise and full of wisdom as ever went as far as to suggest that Camilla should find herself fortuitously unwell on that day!

Charles obsession (everlasting love?) with Camilla was the catalyst and reason that the marriage between Princess Diana and Prince Charles failed. As Diana once wryly put it: hers was an overcrowded marriage of three!

Princess Diana Blog Falls Foul of Google!

2007-08-17T19:56:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Blog: Google Joins The Conspiracy

Okay this post doesn't really have anything to do with Princess Diana but it certainly has to do with this blog. Besides I'm in the process of aggregating new information pertinent to the topic of this blog and for now most of my sources have run dry or a merely duplicating information that can be found elsewhere on the web.

Anyway let me get to the gist of this post!

Google Lies About Impartiality
You're probably thinking that this is just another sour-grapes loser blogger blaming anybody but themselves for their failings! And who the heck am I to question the infallibility of the Great Deity Google?

Be that as it may, but I believe my gripe is justified and here's why...

About six days ago this blog debuted in the Google SERPs (search engine results pages) on page 53 (postion 521-530) and then the very next day it had climbed all the way to page 22 (position 215 or thereabouts) which wasn't bad at all for a blog that was less than 2 months old!

Added to that, the Googlebot was regularly crawling this blog on a daily basis; this I attributed to the fact that I was adding plenty of original content almost daily and working on quality inbound links (which as is the norm these days undergo an incubation period before Google recognizes and fully attributes their value to the destination page).

Something Strange Happens!
My blog that had debuted on page 50 and accelerated to attain an all time high of page 22 on the Google SERPs suddenly dropped right off the Google universe of known search! In the blink of an eye this blog went from 22 to nowhere fast!

So what's Google's beef?

I believe that Google is manually manipulating results ,which actually they admit to doing in the interests of accuracy warranted in such scenarios as weeding out well-optimized spam sites, but that surely is hardly the case here!

This blog has original content and a good flow of traffic, certainly not the hallmarks of a URL that should be penalized! On the other hand I will admit that this is a substantially optimized blog so there is the possibility that the Google algorithm has flagged it for over-optimization (I thought SEO over-optimization was a failing of yesterday's simple search engine scripts...but I suppose I could be wrong.)

Googlebot Reprogrammed Not To Crawl Blog

Here's my smoking gun:
The Googlebot (for reasons best known to it and the folks at Googleland) ceased crawling this blog altogether on the 14th of August! The inexplicable deceleration of the Googlebot crawl rate to absolute cessation (notwithstanding the fact that I'm posting sizable original content on a daily basis) leads me to believe that the bot has been manually re-scripted to restrict its crawl rate of this site (at this point it is not crawling the blog at all) which resulted in my Princess Diana Blog falling right off the SERPs!

Click Here To View Blog's Debut On Google

Princess Diana Death: The 13th Pillar And Whispers Of Satanic Rituals

2007-08-16T20:11:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: Smash Into The 13th Pillar

During my research concerning the crash that killed Princess Diana I have come across several sites and books mentioning satanic ritual activity and the Royal House of Windsor in the same breath! One thing did strike me as odd though...the fact that the Mercedes in which Princess Diana was killed slammed into the 13th pillar!

Sure this is the 21st century not the 18th century where witchcraft, superstition and the unexplained reigned supreme, but just because society has modernized considerably that doesn't rule out the fact that plenty of folks in this day and age still believe and indeed practice pagan rituals that were popular not so long ago.

The English Monarchy is apparently steeped in secret societies such as the Freemasons and the rather more sinister and less well known Illuminati!

There are plenty of sites covering the subject of The Illuminati some of them bordering on the downright preposterous! (Alien hybrids etc...but you never know? These days Fact Is Stranger Than Fiction!)

Anyway far fetched as some of these satanic ritual allegations may be, I am a student of the school of thought that states There Is No Smoke With Out Fire and for that reason I shall add my very own two cents and some on this issue of royalty, satanism and bloodlines!

TO BE CONTINUED! First time here? Click the links to your right to read completed posts.

Princess Diana And The Prince Who Would Not Be King!

2007-08-14T20:02:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana's Son William Vows Never To Be King!

Prince William shocked his father and the Queen when he declared that he doesn't want to and will never be king and will happily concede the honor to younger brother Prince Harry! The Queen was furious and told her son Prince Charles to snap his wayward son in line.

Prince William has never forgiven The Windsors for the way they treated his mother and has never accepted the official story that she died of an accident. William was 15 when Princess Diana died so it is more than likely that she confided her fears of assassination to her eldest son.

These days whether Prince William believes that his mother was murdered or not is anyone's guess, but four years after her death he certainly did not buy the tragic accident story. On the eve of the fourth anniversary of her death, as he knelt by her final resting place he swore to bring her killers to justice! The prince had confided in a number of friends that he had to do it for his mother.

As she was pretty much scorned by the rest of the royal family, Princess Diana must have confided a lot of her dreams and fears to her oldest son, and that burden must weigh heavily on his shoulders. When he made the pledge to Princess Diana that he'd never rest until he found her killers, William took action by hiring an investigator from MI5 another spy branch of the British Secret Intelligence Services.

The man he hired is retired from the MI5 and came highly recommended. The investigator was highly placed within the agency and had access to very sensitive data, and most importantly never bought the story that Princess Diana's death was an accident!

One aspect that always nagged Prince William was how come that night of all nights Princess Diana wasn't wearing her seatbelt! He of all people knew how obsessive his mother was about wearing seat belts, even when wearing formal gowns that would have been even more uncomfortable with a seatbelt on. Princess Diana extended her obsession of wearing seatbelts to her sons, insisting they alway put them on!

Several investigative journalists have since determined that the seatbelts in the Mercedes in which Princess Diana died were all tampered with save for the one that saved Trevor Rhys Jones!

More On Prince William Hiring MI5 Agent To Investigate Princess Diana's Death

Princess Diana Death: An Interesting Turn Of Events!

2007-08-13T19:09:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: All Roads Lead To The Embassy!
As the white Fiat Uno screeched away from the scene of the crash in the Point d'Alma tunnel, hot on its tail was another white car, a Mercedes. The getaway of both these cars cuaght the attention of Gary Hunter, a London based lawyer who was in a room on the 3rd floor of the Royal Alma Hotel. In his own words this is what he ahd to say: "My own feeling is that these people were in a hurry not to be there. I am confident that car was getting off the scene. It was obvious they were getting away from something and that they were in a hurry. It looked quite sinister."

Why Didn't The Fiat Uno Speed Away Along The Freeway

As the two cars sped away they did a most unusual thing. Instead of hightailing it as fast as possible along the freeway and putting as much distance between themselves and the wrecked Mercedes S280 in the tunnel, they executed a high speed tire-screeching turn to proceed along rue Jean Goujean!

A Straight Path To The British Embassy!
Interestingly enough that u-turn the two vehicles made put them on the fastest and shortest route from the Point d'Alma tunnel to the British Embassy located just six blocks away! But why would fleeing suspects head in, what for all intents and purposes, appears to be an illogical direction?

Contingency Plan In The Event Of Vehicular Damage.
Undoubtedly the brains behind the road traffic assassination of Princess Diana must have considered the possibility that any of their cars involved in setting up the crash might incur damage during execution of the faked accident. In the event that happened they'd obviously have set up a contingency plan, which may explain why the Fiat Uno was headed in the direction of the British Embassy.

If, as much circumstantial evidence suggests, MI6 was involved in the murder of Princess Diana then it would make perfect sense for the damaged Fiat Uno to seek refuge at the British Embassy until The Heat (police activity) had simmered down! That would be the last place that anybody would think of looking…at least for a while until inconsistencies started cropping up.

Fiat Uno Found By Al Fayed Investigatory Team
The Fiat Uno was eventually located by Mohamed Al Fayed's (Dodi's dad) private snooping. Where the full might of the French authorities had failed, Mohamed Al fayed succeeded…but I guess unlike the French police Al Fayed was highly motivated and it didn't hurt that he had very deep pockets to reinforce that motivation!

The Fiat Uno had been repainted and was up for sale at the time it was located. The car had indeed belonged to soon-to-be-murdered paparazzi Jean-Paul Andanson at the time of Dodi Fayed's and Princess Diana's death. Although French police had questioned Andanson about his white Fiat Uno early on in the official investigation, they were soons satisfied that his was not the car involved in the crash.

The French police's quick elimination of Andanson as a suspect was all the more surprising because Andanson had embarked on some pretty suspicious movement around the time of the crash and his only alibi removing him from proximity to the crime scene was a gasoline purchase receipt reflecting that he was in another part of France at the time of the accident.

Forensic evidence of paint scratch traces irrefutably put his white Fiat Uno at the scene of the crime!

Princess Diana Death: Some Very Disturbing Coincidences!

2007-08-11T18:34:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: A Series Of Puzzling Coincidences!
Why Was Tony Blair's Flight To Meet Princess Diana's Body From France Scheduled 2 Days Before She Died!

Prime Minister Tony Blair was scheduled to be flown from his constituency in Sedgefield to London to meet the body of Princess Diana on its arrival from France in the aftermath of her death in August of 1997. What was rather puzzling was why the flight crew of the flight had been on standby to make that very same flight two days earlier on Friday...before Princess Diana had even died!

A week prior to the crash in the Point d'Alma Tunnel the BBC (British Broadcasting Company) strangely conducted a dress rehearsal funeral for a member of the royal family. Who could it have been for?

It is possible that it could have been for the Queen Mother, but at that time she was not ailing and in fact was in robust health for someone of her years and went on to live for another five years before her death in 2002.

This intriguing "coincidence" was covered in Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence an excellent book written by investigative reporters Jon King and John Beveridge!

Why Was A Regular Wireless Operator At British Embassy In Paris Booted From His Post Minutes Before Princess Diana Left The Paris Ritz Hotel?

The weekend of Princess Diana's death a spokesperson at the British embassy in Paris cliamed that staff there were unaware that the princess happened to be in Paris. YEAH RIGHT! Why then was a very senior Royal Courtier seen at the embassy half an hour before the crash!

The senior courtier seen at the embassy a bare half hour before the crash (according to what appears to be a very credible witness) was none other than Sir Robert Fellowes (currently Lord Fellowes) private secretary to the Queen and brother-in-law to Princess Diana. Lord Fellowes is married to the late princess' sister, Lady Jane Fellowes.

Lord Fellowes has been described as a man totally devoted to the monarchy and the Queen and in the graphic words of a senior British politician he is a man who well understands that the description of his duties entail him to "throw himself in front of the bullets before they hit the Monarch!"

In the words of constitutional expert Vernon Bogdanor, the position of Private Secretary to the Monarch is `one of the most important posts in the British system of government and a mainstay in the institution of constitutional monarchy' and must `guard the constitutional position of the sovereign.'

Lord Fellowes possessed all the characteristics and qualifications necessary to excel as Private Secretary to the Monarch. As Labor politician Harold Laski put it:

"he must know all that is going on; he must be ready to advise upon all. But he must never so advise that he seems to influence the decision taken by the Queen in terms of the premises of his own thought. He is the confidant of all ministers, but he must never leave the impression that he is anybody's man. He must intrude without ever seeming to intrude.

He must learn how to deflect the lightning from others. He must be able to carry the burden of her mistakes. He must not know the meaning of fatigue. Receiving a thousand secrets, he must discriminate between what may emerge and what shall remain obscure ...It is a life passed amid circumstances in which the most trifling incident may lead to a major disaster."

Coincidentally, the weekend that Princess Diana died, deputy Private Secretary Sir Robin Janvrin was on duty because his superior Sir Robert Fellowes had taken the weekend off. Subsequently in the investigation covering the death of Princess Diana Lord Fellowes was asked to account for his whereabouts that weekend.

His response was that he was at his Norfolk estate in England with his wife and most certainly not in Paris!

However the wireless operator on duty at the British Embassy that weekend has an entirely different recollection of the matter:

What The Wireless Operator Witnessed On August 31, 1997

Apparently a few minutes to midnight, on August 30th, 1997, the regular wireless operator at the British Embassy in Paris was booted out of his office (the communications room which relayed and handled encrypted messages between the embassy and various sensitive locations within the UK).

Sworn to The Official Secrets Act until 2000 (hence his silence), the wireless operator in question had the following astounding recollection about how events unfolded that night:

A few minutes to midnight, two well-spoken public school types (takes one to know one) burst into the communications room and ordered him to vacate the room and not return until otherwise informed to the contrary!

Years later he angrily identified one of the men who kicked him out as follows: "It was that b*****d Fellowes. He turfed me out of my own office. He was in Paris the night Diana died!"

Read The Actual Article As Printed
In The UK Newspaper The Daily Mail

Princess Diana Death: The MI6 Connection!

2007-08-08T20:17:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: MI6 Busy From Dusk Till Dawn
The night that Dodi Fayed, Princess Diana and Henri Paul were killed in the Point d'Alma tunnel in Paris there were several high level MI6 Officer stationed at the British Embassy who were listed as diplomats. However the British Embassy categorically denied the presence of said MI6 officers in Paris on the weekend of August 31, 1997!

But the fact of the matter is that both MI6 and the British Embassy in Paris were very very busy little bees that night!

Paparazzi MI6 Operative Was An Assassin!
Jean-Paul Andanson, the paparazzi who owned the white Fiat Uno that hit Princess Diana's Mercedes and whose body was found burned in a charred wreckage of an abandoned car with a bullet hole neatly drilled to the head was a member of UKN. The UKN is a covert section of MI6 that is comprised of a group of journalists and paparazzi who enable MI6 to surreptitiously keep tabs on the activities of VIPs.

Judging from Jean-Paul Andanson's activities on the night of August 31, 1997, his particular job description went way beyond surveillance of targeted individuals and incorporated a more hands on a approach! Strong evidence in fact suggests that Andanson was an assassin in the employ of at least one intelligence organization!

Four French politicians were discovered dead shortly after being visited and photographed by Jean-Paul Andanson. One of the more prominent deaths in which Andanson was implicated was the alleged suicide of former French Prime Minister Pierre Beregovoy by bullet to the head. Of course take a guess who had recently paid a visit to the former prime minister before he committed suicide...that's right, none other than yours truly Jean-Paul Andanson!

At the time of paparazzi Andanson's death the closed investigation of the alleged suicide of Pierre Beregovoy had been reopened due to the violent deaths of three other French politicians that had some connection to the scandal consuming then French President Francoise Mitterrand. Whether Andanson was definitively linked to those deaths and that scandal is undetermined, but what is known is that he was affiliated to various intelligence organizations and his white Fiat Uno was in the tunnel at the time of the crash that killed Dodi Fayed, Princess Diana and Henri Paul!

Henri Paul Was MI6's Star Informant
Strong evidence suggests that Henri Paul was a double, if not triple agent (or at any rate informant)! According to Richard Tomlinson, the former MI6 agent who was hounded and harassed by that very same intelligence organization for implicating them in the murder of Princess Diana, Henri Paul was undoubtedly an informant for MI6. Tomlinson discovered this super-sensitive information while working in 1992 in the Eastern European Controllerate of MI6.

What caught Tomlinson's attention about this particular informant was the fact that he was of French nationality; it is rare that British Secret Intelligence Services (MI6) are able to recruit the services of a French national (definitely no love lost between France and Britain). Henri Paul's apparent affiliations with intelligence agencies were not restricted to MI6. He was reputed to be an informant for Mossad as well as the DGSE; where his true loyalties lay, one can only wonder?

With Henri Paul As An Asset MI6 Knew Every Little Detail About Princess' Diana's Movements That Weekend!

As head of security at Mohamed Al Fayed's Ritz Hotel in Paris Henry Paul was privy to the innermost details of security enveloping Diana and Dodi that night. As an MI6 informant he was able to convey Princess Diana's and Dodi Fayed's plans to his handler. He was also strategically positioned to install bugs and other listening devices in their suite.

Henri Paul as an MI6 informant would explain how the plotters knew beforehand that Diana and Dodi would take the tunnel route (with a little help of course). Eyewitness, producer Jacques Morel stated that he saw several figures loitering in the tunnel in single file pressed against the wall moments before the crash. Morel and his wife entered the tunnel from the opposite direction and in the opposite lane to the one that the Mercedes carrying Diana and Dodi was traveling.

Those men he saw were probably the assassination clean-up crew and support team (why else were they lurking at the dead of night (past midnight) in a most unusual location...a fume filled tunnel of all places!

In fact as an MI6 informant Henri Paul could well have been the individual responsible in convincing Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed that it was best if they left the hotel. Why else would they have risked running the gauntlet through a posse of hungry and snarling paparazzi all over again? Perhaps Henri Paul was contacted by his MI6 handlers earlier that evening and promised a sizeable sum of money if he could convince Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed to leave the Ritz Hotel using a decoy motorcade set up so that the previously stolen Mercedes S280 could be introduced into the picture with its clandestine modifications. The large amount of cash found in his pocket at the time of his death could have been a down payment for his activities.

As head of security at the Paris Ritz Hotel, Henri Paul was uniquely positioned to convince Diana and Dodi that it was best to leave the Ritz because security had been compromised. Since they had no idea Henri Paul was working with the enemy, Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed would have had no reason to doubt him!

Whatever their reason for leaving the Ritz Hotel that night (it could have simply been that they wanted to celebrate out on the town), the fact remains, thanks to Henri Paul's clandestine activities, every move that Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed made was known to MI6!

Henri Paul's Motives
Henri Paul never had a clue that he was about to die that night. Why else would he accept money if he was aware that he was never going to spend it? He was probably driven by good-ole-fashion greed (which may explain the multiple affiliations with the different intelligence agencies…bigger payday) and probably did not know that his activities were endangering Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed.

MI6 probably convinced Henri Paul that their activities were to ensure the safety of Princess Diana and that by doing as they requested not only was he making their task a lot easier he was also helping to protect the Princess of Wales! Henri Paul would have had little cause to disbelief them. They were, after all, the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS); surely they couldn't be planning to harm the mother of the future king of England? Little did he know!

Henri Paul probably first realized that he'd been misled by MI6, and that in fact his passengers were indeed in danger, as the Mercedes approached the tunnel. Before the entrance to the tunnel there is an exit which aso happened to be conveniently blocked by a vehicle thus negating the option of avoiding the tunnel. It was at this point that a vehicle in front of the Mercedes started weaving and braking dangerously forcing Henri Paul to downshift and overtake it thereby putting the Mercedes in the left lane, exactly where the plotters wanted it!

As the Mercedes pulled away from the Ritz Hotel on th night of the crash, CCTV security footage quite clearly showed that Trevor Rhys Jones was not wearing his seatbelt . So when exactly did he put it on and why did he put it on?

As to why Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed did not wear their seatbelts…well the reason may coincide with why that particular vehicle was stolen (Merecedes S280) . The vehicle had been stolen and tampered with a few weeks before the crash, and some of the things the plotters modified were the passenger seatbelts.

They made sure that an avid seatbelt wearer such as Princess Diana (yes…she would even put her seatbelt on when adorned in an elaborate ballroom gown) would not be able to wear a seatbelt that night; neither would Dodi Fayed! As for Henri Paul...well he was out of luck too! For reasons unknown the airbag on his side of the car did not inflate on impact!

In fact the only interior safety features that functioned in the Mercedes S280 that night were located in the front passenger side of the car. Trevor Rhys Jones despite being seated in the position most associated with crash fatalities was the only person to survive the crash because he had his seatbelt on and the passenger side airbag inflated when the Mercedes slammed into the pillar!

Princess Diana Death: Trapped In A Web Of Spies!

2007-08-06T19:36:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Death: Caught In The Spotlight of 5 Intelligence Agencies!
At the time of her death Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were being monitored by no less than five intelligence agencies which included the following: MI6, NSA, CIA, Mossad and the DGSE! Why such intense interest by so many intelligence groups?

Mossad
It is alleged that Mossad, the much vaunted Israeli intelligence agency was responsible for snatching the Mercedes Benz S280 that was involved in the crash, for the sole purpose of rigging it up for the crash. There're also whispers that Henri Paul was an asset of theirs, allegations that Mossad have never bothered to refute. (Note though that silence in this business does not necessarily symbolize guilt because quite often it's a case of damned if you do…damned if you don't! So in this particular case if Mossad had denied Henri Paul as being an informant of theirs there was sure to be a chorus of voices claiming such a denial was tacit admission to the fact!)

Whether it was MI6 or Mossad who snatched the Mercedes a few weeks before the crash is a moot point at this juncture, however strong circumstantial evidence suggests that the car was tampered with so that it could be remote controlled when the time was necessary and that a small explosive device was installed which would be triggered at the right time (the detonation of that device might be the explosion that several witnesses claim to have heard immediately after observing a blinding flash (strobe light?) just before the Mercedes slammed into the 13th pillar.

Why Would Israel Be Interested In Diana?
Israel had every reason to be concerned about Princess Diana for the very simple reason she was set to marry Dodi Fayed who so happened to be an Egyptian and a Muslim no less! Furthermore Diana was increasingly becoming a voice to be reckoned with in international politics and had in fact been nominated for a Nobel Prize for her campaign to abolish land mines.

The Israelis naturally harbored fears that Princess Diana would meddle in Middle Eastern politics in much the same way that she did with the land mines campaign (which by the way angered certain factions in "democratic" western nations that on the one hand condemn the violence of wars in third world regions like Africa whilst on the other hand, do their best to stoke such conflicts so they can sell their arms! (America is the biggest arms producer in the world! Those arms are produced for profit not altruistic reasons, so they need wars to fuel the sale of those arms! There's an interesting film about that subject starring Nicholas Cage entitled "Lord of War.")

It is very likely that Princess Diana egged on by Dodi Fayed could have brought a shift in perspective and focus on the plight of the Palestinians, spotlighting a harsh, cruel existence ironically reminiscent of the Nazi camps; a reality that is little reported by the much of the mainstream western media and something that Israel very much did not want the world to know! (which may explain why they so often "accidentally" shoot reporters and fire on U.N. troops).

DGSE

The General Directorate of External Security is France's foreign intelligence service and superceded the SDECE. It is nigh impossible that the logistics of this plot could have been achieved without French intelligence cooperation from the highest levels.

Such cooperation may explain why a few minutes prior to the Diana crash all police channels in Paris went inexplicably silent. This would also explain why the Paris Chief of Police was perplexed at why the ambulance transporting Princess Diana from the crash was taking so long to get to the hospital but more so at the reason why nobody could inform him of the ambulance's progress and whereabouts! (Looks like the normal French police were largely left out of the loop and only informed on a need-to-know basis.)

But perhaps the strongest factor suggesting French Intelligence involvement was their silence in the face of the avalanche of accusations emanating from Britain in the aftermath of Princess Diana's death. France and Britain have been centuries old rivals (France supplied Argentina with the deadly and very effective exocet missile against Britain in The Falklands War) and it is more than likely that French authorities (DGSE in this case) would have gone well out of their way to discredit MI6 had they not been part of the plot...or at the very least they would have made a super-concerted effort to bring those responsible to justice if for nothing else than to absolve the French authorities for any perceived mismanagement of the investigation!

NSA & CIA

The NSA (National Security Agency) of America has in its possession over 1050 secret electronic transcripts covering eavesdropped intercepts of Princess Diana's phone calls and conversations retained from other electronic bugging devices!

It is not unusual for friendly secret service agencies to share intelligence on subjects of interest and in fact routinely MI6 makes requests of its bigger and more powerful cousins to keep an eye on British Royalty traveling abroad ostensibly for the royal parties own safety. However the extent of international intelligence surveillance of Princess Diana in the final months of her life far exceeded the norm. Certainly the amount of data that the NSA and CIA had on her was way beyond routine.

It is speculated that one of the motives behind Princess Diana's assassination was her campaign to ban land mines which have had a truly devastating toll on children in Africa (maimed limbs). Though most of the responsible conflicts are long over thousands of unexploded mines still kill, injure and maim people everyday in those regions!

When Princess Diana approached and got a firm assurance from President Clinton to enact a bill that would abolish the United States involvement in the trade of land mines, that move was likely the final nail in the coffin that sealed her death. She now had very powerful enemies across both sides of the Atlantic! By getting Bill Clinton to publicly state that he was going to take action against America's involvement in the trade of land mines she had angered the very powerful American arms cartel that includes very prominent right wing political families in America.

In fact immediately following her death, President Clinton did an about turn on his promise to see a bill through that would abolish the trade of land mines. But the damage was already done and President Clinton was not going to be allowed to get off so easily either.

As the rest of world watched on in sheer incredulity at the absurdness of the spectacle, the events to impeach the most popular and successful American president of the last 40 years dramatically unfolded! What should have been nothing more than a domestic issue was quickly turned into a national issue of gigantic proportions.

What most of the American public didn't know was the impeachment move was being spearheaded by a right wing faction to remove a meddlesome democratic President from interfering with their new world order agenda! (That right wing faction included some of the same people who helped propagate the lie about WMDs (weapons of mass destruction) in Iraq to justify the war)

So you can bet that if those individuals went after President Clinton in the manner they did, they certainly had no qualms aiding and abetting in the assassination of Princess Diana.

Diana's anti-land mine campaign for which she had been nominated a Nobel Peace Prize was in direct conflict with the huge trans-global arms business (America as the biggest arms producer in the world is its center) and its consequential manufacture of wars in regions where they can test and sell their arms at great human loss but enormous profit! Such regions include Africa, The Middle East and South America!

MI6
Princess Diana's murder and its subsequent cover up could and would never have happened had it not been orchestrated by the British Secret Intelligence Services, in this case MI6! That said, the faction in MI6 responsible for her death would never have taken action had they not been authorized from some one very high up in the monarchy...and no that does not mean the Queen!

I have never believed that the Queen was involved in Diana's death and in fact contrary to public belief in the wake of Princess Diana's death, the Queen's actions were the strongest indication that she was not privy or part of the plot! People complained that the lack of any public display of anguish or sympathy for Diana's death from the monarchy was tantamount to an admission of guilt or complicity in her death.

I think it was the exact opposite! If the Queen had been involved she'd have gone out of her way to show how saddened she felt by the princess' death and thus dispel any whispers of involvement. Besides she also warned Princess Diana's former butler (in a protective manner for his own good as opposed to a threatening manner) with the words "There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge."

But the fact of the matter is the Queen played it the way she saw fit and in the manner in which she was brought up, which with hindsight proved to be far removed from the expectations of the England of the day! Let's not forget that the Queen grew up in an era not known or long forgotten to many of us!

Summary: MI6's involvement in this convoluted conspiracy is quite substantial and thus rates a post all of its own and will indeed be my next post!

Princess Diana: The Politics Behind Her Murder

2007-08-05T19:34:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Murder: Who Was Behind It?

The question of who killed Princess Diana is best answered by considering who might have gained from her death. People who never bought the accident-at-the-hands-of-a-drunk theory tend to favor the House of Windsor as prime suspects for the dirty deed and indeed when one considers their hand in obstructing the investigation into what happened on the night of the accident they certainly pose as a well-qualified suspect!

But the truth is there were several other parties who stood to gain from Princess Diana's removal from the international stage too.

(To Be Continued...if this is your first visit you may wish to read complete earlier posts found under the title: Blog Archive to your right)

Princess Diana Murder: Tale Of Two Spooks Who Dared To Cry Foul!

2007-08-03T20:20:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Death: Intelligence Agencies Turn On Their Own!

Former MI6 operative Richard Tomlinson for several years now has been hounded by the very same agency that he dedicated his life! Why? Because he dared to voice dismay and disgust at some of their methods and policies namely those of assassinating foreign heads of state and other dignitaries.

A Spook's Life
Richard Tomlinson was employed by MI6 from September 1991 to April 1995. By all accounts his was an exemplary career in MI6. He was part of a highly successful and complicated mission to smuggle nuclear secrets and advanced soviet weaponry out of the then disintegrating Soviet empire.

Tomlinson was also involved in another vital and hugely successful mission that involved deactivating a criminal organization that was attempting to smuggle chemical weapons into Iran! So with all this success under his belt why would MI6 get rid of him? After all it costs a bucket load of money to train an agent of Tomlinson's caliber!

No Place For A Straight Arrow
The Intelligence Business by its very nature is an ugly business. There are no rights or wrongs, no absolutes of black or white, only unending shades of gray! If one wishes to be truly successful at this kind of business then it's best to park your scruples and conscience outside before you step in. Why? Because absolute loyalty is a must and somewhere along the line you're going to be asked to do something ugly and evil!

Something like kill innocent people, bump off democratically elected heads of state and if necessary kill off a few kids to boot! This kind of business as you can see has no time or place for morality. With all that sordidness flying about it is absolutely imperative that the public never ever get to know the "price of their freedom"; that's why revelation of national secrets by a government agent falls under treason and at its most severest is punishable by death!

Fired For Not Wearing A Tie To Meet War Criminal!
Ostensibly the main reason that Richard Tomlinson was fired was because he failed to wear a tie to a meeting with Serbian war criminal Radovan Karadzic. Seems a somewhat lame excuse to fire a top asset like Tomlinson don't you think? Truth of the matter is Tomlinson was fired because of what he knew and his objections to some of MI6's methods.

While still working as an MI6 operative in civil-war torn Yugoslavia in 1992 Tomlinson became privy to assassination plans to bump off President Slobodan Milosevic by faking a car accident!

Plot To Kill Slobodan Milosevic By Car Accident
The plan most favored with which to do away with Slobodan Milosevic involved arranging his limousine to crash in a tunnel using a strobe light to blind the driver. The location of the tunnel was strategic in that its narrow confines would greatly enhance the fatality rate and also an added bonus was that a tunnel would reduce the number of unwanted eyewitnesses!

Does any of this sound vaguely familiar? Hmmmm...hang on isn't that the exact scenario for the Princess Diana crash!

The assassination plot to kill Slobodan Milosevic via car accident never proceeded but such a scenario was kept on the back-burner for future use. What was more pressing for the MI6 Big Dogs was what to do with operative Richard Tomlinson. His apparent distaste for assassinating foreign leaders (even one as reprehensible as Milosevic) was most worrying indeed; it proved that he was an asset who could not be relied upon!

The Diana Issue Becomes Top Priority
By 1995 it had become evident to the British security apparatus that it was no longer a matter of "IF" but "WHEN" Princess Diana was to be killed! She was more than a thorn in the crown's side and the blasted woman had really become a downright nuisance!

Little known to the British public MI5 and MI6 allegiance is more so to the monarchy than the British government! Routine surveillance of royal personage is standard for their "apparent" protection. Communication between the Royal Household and MI6 usually goes through the Foreign Office concerning requests such as threat assessments for Royals traveling abroad.

This service incorporates the expertise of friendly intelligence services such as the CIA and NSA amongst others, to place members of the Royal Family under discrete surveillance ostensibly for their own protection.

However there are less official channels of communication between the Royal Household and MI6. Richard Tomlinson had come across such unofficial channels between select highly placed MI6 officers and senior members of the Royal Family. Tomlinson had also come across an MI6 French informant who worked as security at the Ritz hotel in Paris. Subsequently he identified this informant as none other than Henri Paul, Head of Security at The Paris Ritz Hotel owned by Mohamed Al Fayed!

Princess Diana Assassination Is A Go!
With Princess Diana branded as a loose cannon and getting more and more out of hand as far as the British Royal Family was concerned, her hooking up with a Muslim with the intent to marry was absolutely the final straw for them! The woman just had to go! Furthermore with the extensive surveillance on Princess Diana it is certain that MI6 were well aware of Princess Diana's pregnancy and impending marriage plans.

What is more they also knew of her plans to announce it to the whole world on the very day she was killed!

However before the assassination plan could be set in motion MI6 had to get rid of that morality-stricken and troublesome operative Richard Tomlinson. If he had considered the assassination of a mass murderer (President Slobodan Milosevic) repugnant who's to know where he'd stand when it came to the assassination of a much beloved British Royal? Who's to say what kind of meddlesome problems he could cause?

Tomlinson Had To Go!
The man knew way too much about the assassination technique that was eventually employed and besides he'd been privy to data that made him quite knowledgeable about several of the players involved in the plot!

Nope! Best thing was to fire him and pray that he kept his mouth shut. And if not,well goddamn it...this was MI6! With the full might of the British empire behind them (at least what's left of it) how hard would it be to contain one former operative? If he insisted on raising a ruckus he'd be duly dealt with!

Well Tomlinson got the boot and so did Princess Diana, her case though was more permanent! As for Richard Tomlinson when he heard of Princess Diana's death he had little doubt that MI6 were involved and he thus felt a moral obligation to present what he knew to the subsequent inquiry into the crash headed by Judge Herve Stephan.

And that's when his real problems began...
Click Here To Read Richard Tomlinson's Affidavit

The Strange Case Of Oswald LeWinter
Oswald LeWinter was a career CIA agent who was recruited into the agency during the Vietnam War. Much like Tomlinson, LeWinter grew disillusioned with The Agency (CIA) and was soon branded as rogue agent or a renegade.

In April of 1998 Al Fayed's chief of security John McNamara (a former Chief Superintendent of Scotland Yard) met Oswald LeWinter in Austria. The purpose of that rather clandestine meeting was for McNamara to review some highly classified documents that LeWinter claimed to have in his possession. The documents that LeWinter claimed to have were secret CIA files that proved Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were murdered and did not die in a simple car accident.

According to Le Winter the files proved beyond any shadow of doubt that driver Henri Paul had been poisoned and that the Mercedes had been tampered with. Unlike Tomlinson however, who was driven by a moral obligation to reveal the truth, LeWinter expected a payday. He asked for $20, 000, 000 dollars if Mohamed Fayed wanted the documents.

However before the transaction could take place LeWinter was nabbed by the FBI in Austria. Subsequently word filtered to the public that LeWinter had been nabbed while attempting to peddle forged documents!

However that story doesn't quite ring true? First of all the FBI was way out of its jurisdiction, to be making arrests in a foreign country and why would they go to such lengths to to recover documents that were supposed forgeries. The truth of the matter is that LeWinter was given a choice: concede that the documents he had were forgeries and he'd only be charged with fraud. If he didn't play along then they'd slap him with the whole nine yards...high treason for the theft and intent to disseminate highly classified information!

Naturally Oswald LeWinter played along especially when the subject of his family's safety cropped up! He was eventually sentenced to 24 months in an Austrian prison.

In a sworn testimony, LeWinter stated that the documents presented at the time of his arrest as evidence against him most certainly were not the original documents he'd left in his room prior to his meeting with John McNamara, Al Fayed's chief of security!

Oswald LeWinter's Statement

Princess Diana Death: A Parade Of Patsies

2007-08-02T19:27:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Assassination: Not The Usual Suspects
No self-respecting assassination plot is complete without a cast of patsies and this one is no different. This plot in fact has more than its fair share of patsies! The word paparazzi became common language after August 31, 1997, the night that Princess Diana was killed.

From the moment Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed arrived in Paris from Sardinia on August 30, 1997 they were harassed by an unusually aggressive breed of Paparazzi! One dark car in particular, filled with "paparazzi," weaved, swerved and braked recklessly and dangerously in front of their limo as Dodi and Diana were ferried from the airport.

Thus a precedent was being set for what was to come later that night leading up to the crash. In all likelihood that car and those men in the car were not paparazzi but rather security agents (intelligence agents) setting a pattern of behavior that would stick in everyone's mind thereby reinforcing the impression that it was the paparazzi who caused the crash!

Another strange coincidence (and certainly not the last) was that there were no British journalists entrenched within the ranks of the paparazzi that night in Paris. It's not as if Princess Diana's and Dodi Fayed's plans were a secret; which begs the question, were the British journalists warned to stay away? After all photos of Princess Diana commanded a hefty price so it would have been very much in the interest of those journalists to have been in Paris with the rest of the pack that weekend.

Parade of Patsies
Multiple eyewitness accounts from individuals in the tunnel at the time of the crash differentiate the main pack of the paparazzi from the two vehicles that appeared to work in tandem to cause the crash. These two vehicles, a powerful motorbike ridden by two riders and a white Fiat Uno were hot on the tail of the Mercedes prior to its entry into the Point d'Alma tunnel (the Fiat Uno was actually ahead of the Mercedes as if waiting in ambush) and they also happened to be way ahead of the other genuine paparazzi vehicles!

Thus by all accounts the real paparazzi were not in the tunnel at the moment of the crash! But they certainly made a very convenient and believable scapegoat or in any other language…patsy!

Paparazzi Frenzy Fest!
It is a well publicized fact that several persons took photos of the wrecked Mercedes and its occupants in the initial aftermath of the crash. Could some of those callous journalists have actually been security operatives (intelligence agents) who'd been loitering and mingling with the other paparazzi much of the day of August 30, 1997? The former Chief Superintendent of Scotland Yard, John McNamara, who was appointed by Mohamed Al Fayed to head an investigation of the crash confirmed from security camera footage from that night were indeed British and other foreign intelligence operatives mingling with the crowd of paparazzi.

Police Confiscate Crash Photos Supposedly Out Of Concern For Family Members
French Police wasted no time whatsoever in confiscating all photographs and other footage of the crash scene. The basis for their actions was apparently out of concern for the emotional trauma it would cause the relatives of the crash victims. But was that really their motivation; certainly it was quite convenient for the public to think so but what if there was another more sinister ulterior motive? Perhaps they were making sure that there were no loose ends left, like compromising photographs that could contradict the official account!

A Rash Of Press Agency Burglaries
Evidence tending to support the ulterior-motive angle is amply illustrated by the spate of similar burglaries that happened within hours of the crash. As things turned out, it so happened that not all the photos of the crash scene were confiscated by the French Police. Time is money, and nowhere is that adage as true as in the celebrity photojournalism business. Thus it really wasn't too surprising that some images of the crash got to London before the French Police and other security agents could get their hands on them. But ultimately it made little difference because London happened to be the plotters' backyard.

Just hours after the crash photojournalist Lionel Cherruault had his home burgled following a contact from a fellow journalist concerning photos taken of the crash in the Point d'Alma tunnel. Another photojournalist was to suffer the same fate too; Darryn Lyons had his London photo lab broken into the very same day that he received emailed images of the crash from French photo agent Laurent Sola.

What Was On The Photos That Could Not Be Allowed To Become Public?
While Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana were getting killed, the other decoy vehicles (a Mercedes S600 in which they'd been traveling all day and an escort Range Rover) had proceeded via another route to Dodi's apartment. When they got there, Dodi's other bodyguard (Kez Wingfield) and regular driver (Philippe Dourneau) heard of the crash and immediately rushed to the tunnel. Wingfield proceeded to call Dodi's father in London and informed him of the crash while Dourneau went to check on the wrecked vehicle and its occupants.

Dourneau's assessment of Princess Diana's injuries was that she had hurt her legs but otherwise appeared fine! There're also other witness accounts that largely contradict the official account, in that Princess Diana was not as badly injured as was made out. In fact many of the paparazzi claim that the Princess was sitting up and conscious after the crash at the time they took photos.

Could the fact that Princess Diana was not as critically injured as has been widely reported have been the real reason why the plotters were so frantic to get their hands on all photos?

Enter The Fallback Patsy!
Much in part to the numerous contradictory eyewitness accounts, it soon became clear to the plotters that pursuing the paparazzi-as-the-cause-of-the-crash angle was a lost cause. The grieving public simply wasn't buying it! It was time to move on to the fallback patsy, a scapegoat that turned out to be much more readily accepted by the world at large!

After several days of being held incommunicado the arrested paparazzi were eventually released but with strict warning not to talk or to publish any photos about the Diana crash if they valued their careers and lives! Like many a witness in this conspiracy, those journalists have largely kept quiet out of fear that they may wind up dead!

So who was the fallback patsy? The driver Henri Paul of course! The plot claims that he was a chronic alcoholic who happened to be heavily under the influence of booze the very night of the crash. Unfortunately for the plotters that theory too doesn't hold water (Read about Henri Paul alleged drunkenness here) and there only hope now is that their biggest ally of all (time) will not fail them!

Princess Diana:Killed Because She Was Pregnant?

2007-08-01T18:57:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana: Was Her Pregnancy Reason For Illegal Embalming?

Over and over again the establishment have gone to great lengths to assure the public that Princess Diana was not pregnant with Dodi Fayed's child at the time of her death. It has to be right because they said so and anyway it was widely stated as such in the press and on TV. And we all know how so very accurate information from the TV is not so? (I'm being sarcastic in case you haven't caught on).

But what if the story of her having not been pregnant is just another lie disseminated by the perpetrators? It is known that the day before she and Dodi were killed they were very excited about something. In fact despite widely acclaimed denials from those who would benefit from keeping such information hidden, Dodi Fayed had already bought Princess Diana a ring!

The intelligence agencies were well aware of this fact! On August 21, 1997 Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed left London for a cruise on the Cote d'Azur aboard Al Fayed's luxury yacht The Jonikal.

Picking Out A Ring And Excited Over Pregnancy
It was during this cruise that Dodi and Princess Diana gave their bodyguards the slip when the yacht anchored off Cap Ferrat in Monaco. Whilst ashore and having given their bodyguards the slip, they picked out an engagement ring at the Repossi Jewelry Store in the Hermitage Hotel, leaving instructions that it be forwarded to the Repossi Store in Paris for collection the next week.

The intelligence agencies were well aware of this and knew that time was running out. If they were going to assassinate Princess Diana and fake it as an accident the window of opportunity was fast shrinking. They had to strike soon before Dodi and Diana announced their engagement and her pregnancy thereby giving a very strong case for murder in the event they both met with an untimely death!

Diana herself had informed reporters the day before her death (August 30, 1997) that she had a big surprise...news that would rock the British Monarchy to the core! Could that big surprise have been that she and Dodi were about to get married or even more startling that not only was she about to marry Dodi Fayed but that she was pregnant with his child!

Was Princess Diana Illegally Embalmed To Cover Up Her Pregnancy?
After the horrendous crash in the tunnel one of first people on the scene to assist the injured princess was a doctor (not affiliated with the authorities) who said that Princess Diana kept mumbling something while at the same time rubbing her abdomen. Could Diana have been trying to bring attention to the fact that she was pregnant and that the status of her baby should be checked?

The body of the Princess of Wales was illegally embalmed several hours following the announcement of her death at 4.00 a.m. on August 31st, 1997! The embalming took place at 2 p.m. on 31 August 1997, a process that took about two and a half hours.

The embalming procedure was at the behest of Sir Michael Jay, the British Ambassador in Paris who relayed specific instructions to Madame Coujard of the Public Prosecutor's Office in Paris that Princess Diana's body should be embalmed! It is of significance that there was no such request to have Dodi Fayed embalmed!

Why Was Embalming Princess Diana Illegal And What Purpose Did It Serve?
According to French Law (Codes of Territorial Authorities) before an embalming may take place authorization must be obtained from the mayor of the region in which death took place or the location in which embalming was to proceed.

There are various stipulations and requirements stated within "The Codes of Territorial Authorities" that must be met before an embalming can legally take place in France. One that has particular relevance in the embalming of Princess Diana states the following requirement: " A certificate from the doctor authorized to certify death, confirming that there are no legal reasons why this procedure cannot proceed."

Yet get this...no such authorization was given by the attendant physician who signed the death certificate!

In fact according to Doctor Bruno Riou, the on-call emergency anesthetist who was part of the surgery team that attended and tried to resuscitate Princess Diana when she finally arrived at the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, he specifically signed a certificate that declared there were medical and legal reasons why embalming of Princess Diana should not proceed! Those reasons were on account that the princess' death was due to an "accident" as opposed to natural causes!

In spite of Dr. Bruno Riou's legal certificate opposing expeditious embalming of Diana's body pending further investigation, for reasons unknown the procedure still went ahead! It should be noted that Dr. Bruno Riou was the physician who officially pronounced Princess Diana dead at 4.00 a.m. on August 31, 1997.

Embalming Princess Diana Would Have Hidden All Trace Of Her Pregnancy!
The only conclusion that one can possibly arrive at is that persons unknown went to great lengths to ensure no autopsy was ever conducted on Princess Diana. Why? How about the fact that an autopsy and blood samples from the princess' body would have revealed beyond a shadow of doubt that Diana was pregnant!

And that was something the people behind her assassination could never allow because then it would lead the entire accident scenario into completely new territory...that of murder and conspiracy!

The embalming procedure was an insurance policy!
If ever an autopsy or pregnancy test was conducted after embalming had taken place the embalming fluid within Diana's body would return a compromised result. On the off chance that a pregnancy test was conducted and came back with a positive results the plotters could scientifically argue that it was a false positive result due to the embalming fluid and not to a true pregnancy.

As for the reason for the embalming? It was something along the lines that Princess Diana's body was being preserved so that she could be viewed and given a final farewell (closure?) by the grieving public!

Princess Diana Murder Plot

Princess Diana Death: They Lied When They Said That Her Injuries Were Fatal!

2007-07-30T02:05:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana: Did She Really Have To Die?
The injury that killed Princess Diana although critical was not fatal and in fact former President Ronald Reagan survived a similar injury when he was shot by John Hinckley in 1981! Surely if a 70 year old man could have survived such an injury why not a 36 year old woman in good health?

The French doctors who were part of the team that tried to resuscitate Princess Diana at the hospital following the crash cited a tear in the left pulmonary vein as the source of internal bleeding that ultimately led to her death...there was no mention of other specific lesions!

Their conclusion was in stark contrast to the remarks made by the French Minister of Health and other officials (and widely embraced by the public, the media, and disseminated by the official report) that Princess Diana died as a result of massive multiple internal injuries that left her no chance to survive!

If Princess Diana Had Been Taken To A Hospital Within An Hour After Crash She'd Probably Be Alive Today!
The simple truth is, it is very highly likely that if Princess Diana had been rushed to a hospital immediately instead of being snail-paced for two hours in an ambulance she will still be alive today! Several eminent doctors from around the globe (including French physicians) agreed that a timely evacuation to the hospital would have probably saved the Princess!

This tends to corroborate my theory postulating the real reason why the ambulance journey took so long; the plotters were waiting for Princess Diana to bleed out before presenting her to other personnel not privy or involved in the plot (waiting hospital staff).

Nobody really knows what went on in that ambulance and who was in it besides Princess Diana. Another questionable aspect concerning the 2-hour journey fiasco that has come to light is whatever happened to the police presence that was initially escorting the ambulance? More on the 2-Hour Ambulance Ride

Princess Diana's Condition When The First Emergency Vehicles Arrived!
The first witnesses to the crash site discovered Princess Diana seated on the floor of the car with her legs on the backseat and her head sandwiched between the backs of the two front seats. Her eyes were open and she was speaking indistinctly (bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones supposedly heard her call out Dodi Fayed's name) which established Diana as being conscious at this point.

The first emergency vehicle arrived seven minutes after the crash (Sapeurs-Pompiers, a military emergency service) and the SAMU ambulance that took her to the hospital arrived eight minutes later. The physician from the SAMU ambulance said that Princess Diana was agitated and crying and repeatedly mover her left arm and right leg (once again establishing that Princess Diana was indeed still conscious at this point).

Apparently Princess Diana then went into cardiac arrest while being extracted form the wreckage so she was intubated, put on a respirator and given external chest massage to reestablish a heart rhythm.

Review Of The Injury That Killed Princess Diana
The crash caused Princess Diana's pulmonary vein to tear; this type of injury is commonly categorized as a deceleration injury because as the name implies it occurs when a person in motion is subjected to the massive traumatic force caused by sudden excessive deceleration. The Mercedes Benz S280 ramming into the pillar at 60 miles an hour definitely fits into this category.

The pulmonary vein transports oxygen-rich blood from the lungs to the heart where it is then pumped to the rest of the body. The pulmonary vein is a large vessel that transports a significant amount of blood. A rip or injury to this vessel will result in internal bleeding in the chest that can quite easily become rapidly fatal; however if the tear is minimal then there's a good chance that bleeding would be minimal and that expeditious repair of the tear would save the patient.

The fact that Princess Diana arrived at the hospital almost 2 hours later alive is evidence that the tear to her pulmonary vessel must have been a small tear that exuded blood at a slow rate. (Now you can see why it was so important for the ambulance to take its time getting to the hospital. If the tear had been bigger chances are they'd have gotten Diana to the hospital that much sooner. The outcome would have been the same though, because the assassins would have still ensured that by the time she was handed over to the Trauma Staff at the hospital she'd have been beyond resuscitation...which also explains the final 10 minute stop just outside the hospital gates).

As pre-eminent cardiologist Dr. John Ochsner (Chairman Emeritus of surgery at the Alton Ochsner clinic in New Orleans) put it: "depending on the size of the rent, or tear. If it wasn’t too big, they could put the patient on a heart lung machine and just go in and do the repair electively. It’s pretty obvious: with that lesion, if you can get them in hospital and on a heart lung machine early enough you can save them. But time is of essence."

He is just one of a very long list of several physicians who believe that expeditious transport of Princess Diana to a hospital operating room could well have saved her! Read the views of other physicians here.

It is tempting to conclude that the French emergency evacuation procedures are ironically to blame for Princess Diana's untimely death thereby relegating the entire incident as a mishandled tragic accident. But when one also considers the superb "bungling" of the investigation, disappearance of witnesses, the climbing body count, plethora of lies circulated and other suspicious events, that 2 hour hospital ride is really just a tad too convenient to have been anything but part of the assassination plot!

Princess Diana Crash: Blood Sample Belonged To Suicide Victim Not Driver!

2007-07-27T19:56:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Death: Blood Sample Exhibited All The Hallmarks Of Suicide Victim!

It is now known that the blood sample cited in the official report as belonging to driver Henri Paul was not in fact his! Subsequent investigation revealed that not only was the chain of evidence critically broken, but it also seems that certain parties were involved in purposefully falsifying results! Read about it here.

As clearly illustrated below that controversial blood sample strongly possessed characteristics one would expect to find in a suicide victim not a man who had been functioning normally:

1) Extremely high levels of alcohol

2) Toxic levels of carbon monoxide

3) Antidepressants

In an attempt to pin such a blood sample on Henri Paul the plotters had to create a picture of an individual who was a chronic alcoholic in the mind of the public. This image of a chronic alcoholic was also the plotters key to explaining how Henri Paul could apparently function normally whilst heavily intoxicated! The basis being that after longterm exposure to a drug (in this case heavy use of alcohol) the body adapts by recalibrating itself through a build up of tolerance to the drug enabling the individual to function normally...just so long as they routinely get their fix!

Without Constant Booze Intake Driver Would Have Shown Withdrawal Symptoms
Henri Paul would have had to imbibe a good amount of alcohol every single day to avoid withdrawal symptoms which in the case of booze characteristically manifest as delirium tremens, otherwise known as the DTs or the shakes; as the name (the shakes) implies, this particular withdrawal symptom commonly has the afflicted individual twitching uncontrollably!

Other symptoms of delirium tremens include visual hallucinations, confusion, agitation and a moderate to severe degree of disorientation. Certainly these are not characteristics that Henri Paul showed at any time and it is unthinkable to believe that he could have been so afflicted without anybody ever having noticed!

Autopsy Of Henri Paul Showed No Evidence Of Alcoholism

If Henri Paul were truly a chronic alcoholic as we were made to believe then surely the autopsy conducted on his body would have revealed at the very least some evidence corroborating such fact! But guess what? There was no such evidence; no trace or hint of liver damage as is routinely found in alcoholics!

In fact what is particularly interesting is how the private lab (Dr. Pepin's Lab) that conducted the analysis of the two contentious blood samples (the ones that magically appeared from nowhere and then just as magically disappeared after "proving" that Henri Paul was drunk) came up with the miraculous conclusion that Henri Paul was "in a state of moderate chronic alcoholism for a minimum of one week." Not only was such a statement unsubstantiated by the autopsy findings, in and of itself, it was most strange indeed!

Henri Paul Was A Licensed Pilot With Over 600 HRs of Flying Time!

Nowhere is it mentioned in the official report that the supposed chronic alcoholic, Henri Paul, was an accomplished pilot who was highly thought of by his former flight instructor. I guess even the instructor was unable to recognize a raving alcoholic in spite of when sitting right next to one in the narrow confines of a cockpit!

Two days before the crash, Henri Paul had passed every test required to become a licensed pilot. Hmmmm...perhaps that may explain his drunkeness; he was so ecstatic about getting his license he decided to go on an alcoholic binge! Implausible as this last scenario is, it certainly sounds more plausible than the official version that Henri Paul was a chronic alcoholic!

Princess Diana Death: Driver's Blood Sample Was Swapped!

2007-07-25T19:53:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: If Driver's Blood Sample Is To Believed, Henri Paul Would Have Been Comatose!
If one were to believe the lab results of Henri Paul's blood sample, then Henri Paul would, at best have been incapacitated with a very severe pulsing migraine-like headache, and at worst would have been comatose! Either way, according to the blood sample results released by the authorities, Henri Paul would never have been able to drive on that night of August 31, 1997, let alone swerve and collide with a pillar after some undeniably pretty skillful driving!

Significance Of Henri Paul's Lab Results
According to the official report, Henri Paul's Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) at the time of his death was an astounding 0.30% which is almost 4 times over the legal limit! (As far as California State is concerned a BAC of 0.08% renders you as legally unfit to drive.) Such a blood alcohol level means that Henri Paul would have been teetering on the verge of unconsciousness if anything, certainly he would not have been able to steer a vehicle in any manner at all.

If one were to translate Henri Paul's supposed blood alcohol levels into the number of drinks he'd have had to imbibe to attain those levels this is how it would look:

1) 12 drinks in 1 hour (if his stomach was empty)

2) 24 drinks in 1 hour (if he'd eaten a meal)

That number of drinks amply illustrates that Henri Paul would not have been able to talk coherently, walk, let alone drive! If the blood sample accredited to Henri Paul was actually his…HENRI PAUL WOULD HAVE BEEN STUMBLING, RAVING, ROLLING DRUNK!

How Did Toxic Levels Of Carbon Monoxide Appear In His Blood Sample?
Before I tackle the rather intriguing puzzle of how toxic levels of carbon monoxide were introduced into Henri Paul's blood it is interesting to note that carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning coincidentally happens to be the most common type of fatal poisoning in France! (The significance of this will become apparent later on).

The levels of carbon monoxide found in Henri Paul's supposed blood sample was in excess of 2,000 PPM (parts per million) or 0.20%. With such blood levels Henri Paul would have experienced an excruciating blinding headache, dizziness, nausea and would have been dead within 1.5 hours from initial introduction.

Surely it truly is stretching the bounds of belief (suspended or otherwise) that a human being could possibly function normally (or what appeared normal to everybody) with such a lethal dose of carbon monoxide in their bloodstream!

Was The Carbon Monoxide Introduced From Crash Vehicle?
Some devoted advocates for the accident scenario may well postulate that the carbon monoxide got into Henri Paul as a result of the idling Mercedes engine within the confines of the Point d'Alma tunnel. Well, if that were the case then Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana would have exhibited similarly toxic levels of carbon monoxide.

But guess what…surprise…surprise, they didn't. In any case the tunnel was way too large and well ventilated for anybody to accumulate such a lethal dose of CO (carbon monoxide) whether they'd been there for hours with a running engine.

Moreover even if one were to pursue the CO intoxication from the exhaust of the idling engine of the wrecked Mercedes angle, such a scenario would still be impossible for the simple fact that Henri Paul was killed on impact! I guess a broken neck will do that!

So now the question remains, and it really is THE ONLY QUESTION, how could that carbon monoxide have gotten into Henri Paul's supposed posthumous blood sample? Quite often the solution to a puzzle is the simplest and most obvious and in this case it boils down to the inescapable fact that:

The Blood Sample Cited By Official Report Was Not Henri Paul's!
The most obvious step to prove beyond a shadow-of –doubt whether the blood sample belonged to Henri Paul or not would have been to conduct a DNA test; but of course this was never done and unsurprisingly there are no remnants of the blood samples in question. So legally there is absolutely no basis on which those samples could be attributed to Henri Paul!

The autopsy done on Henri Paul was carried out by Professor Dominique Lecompte in front of one Commander Mules and the following is what is known:

1) Supposedly 5 samples were taken from the body of Henri Paul.

2) Commander Mules stated that they were handled and processed in the same manner.

3) Two of those blood samples were sent to different labs for testing; the other 3 samples remained at the lab where Professor Dominique Lecompte conducted the autopsy.

4) Of those two samples sent off both supposedly revealed the massive levels of alcohol as well as toxic levels of carbon monoxide. Contrary to normal procedure the unused portions of these samples were conveniently never preserved (ensures that no pesky confirmatory DNA test could be conducted at a later date)!

5) Later on in a Paris Court, under oath Professor Dominique Lecompte revealed that she only took three samples of blood from Henri Paul's body under Commander Mule's supervision (to date nobody can adequately explain where the other 2 samples came from).

6) The unused portions of the 3 samples that Professor Lecompte concedes to have taken should remain but once again guess what…NO SAMPLES REMAIN!

7) 4 days after his death another blood sample was drawn from Henri Paul with Judge Herve Stephan in attendance (French Judge Heading the French Investigation). This sample was sent to the same lab as the other mysterious 2 samples had been; this sample like the others was handled by a Dr. Pepin. This sample was drawn from a different area of the body using a different means of extraction. When the results came back astonishingly they were almost identical as the other two suspicious samples handled by Dr. Pepin's lab.

According to several top international experts such closely similar results under such variably different circumstances was highly suspect to say the least. MORE AMAZING STILL WAS HOW THE UNUSED PORTION OF THAT NEW BLOOD SAMPLE MYSTERIOUSLY DISAPPEARED TOO!

8) The only sample that was tested for Henri Paul's DNA and confirmed said DNA came from one of the original three samples drawn by Prof. Lecompte. Nobody however ever bothered to clarify this little fact for it was more expedient to let the world think that the bogus samples were indeed the ones belonging to Henri Paul!

9) Though it was claimed that the blood samples were all handled, processed and stored in the same manner, this was not true at all. In fact one of the containers allegedly containing a blood sample from Henri Paul exhibited evidence of another name having been hastily scratched out and replaced with that of Henri Paul!

Princess Diana Crash: Official Report Lied That Driver Was Drunk!

2007-07-24T01:20:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Death: Official Report Was Bogus!
The gospel according to the official report has it that "boozehound Henri Paul" snuggled up behind the wheel of the Mercedes S280 on the night of August 31, 1997 and proceeded to drive in what can best be described as a reckless and dangerous manner (attaining speeds of 196 km/h!) before colliding with the 13th pillar of the Point d'Alma tunnel ending the lives of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed as well as himself!

Well that's the official line…but guess what?

Tell A Lie Long And Loud Enough And Soon It Becomes The Truth!
Unfortunately for the individuals who masterminded the death of Princess Diana, Mohammed Al Fayed happened to be the owner of the Paris Ritz Hotel. This meant that the usual trick of conveniently disappearing compromising evidence (in this case video footage) could not be so easily applied here. In this particular case the errant footage is the CCTV security footage from the Ritz Hotel on the night of the crash showing a stone cold sober Henri Paul walking normally, chatting to Dodi and Princess Diana moments before entering the vehicle!

Would Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed or Trevor Rhys Jones Step Into A Car Driven By A Raving Drunk?
Have you ever seen someone who's drunk in action? It's quite easy to tell they are drunk isn't it, for the mere fact they tend to exhibit characteristics commonly associated with such a condition. Okay… I'll admit to having been drunk at least once in my life which endows me with more than necessary credentials to talk authoritatively on the subject (besides, more importantly, as a reformed Party Animal I have witnessed scores of other drunken individuals in action…so I know what I'm talking about!)

Henri Paul showed none of the usual symptoms characteristic of a drunken individual. Such symptoms include:

1. Slurred speech;

2. Unsteady gait (staggering and unable to walk straight...the basis of the test that cop's subject you to if they think that you're a drink-drive candidate);

3. Impaired judgment and inability to make rational decisions;

4. An accompanying odor of booze; and

5. Glazed drippy facial features.

Henri Paul showed none of such characteristics and as mentioned above, before they set off in the Mercedes, Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana chatted with Henri Paul. Neither of them showed any signs that they were concerned about Henri Paul's fitness to drive.

Besides, surely bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones should have at least detected something? I mean this was a man who was trained to protect dignitaries! Surely it would fall within his job description and abilities to recognize when the chauffeur is drunk or not. In any case when Trevor Rhys Jones finally regained consciousness after the crash, although he could not remember a number of details about it, he did categorically state that Henri Paul was not drunk!

The official report evidently pushed the "impaired judgment" angle in the press and media so much so that soon enough most of the world believed that it Diana and Dodi died because their drunk driver thought it best to outrun the paparazzi in a car chase that attained speeds of 196 km/h before their car finally slammed into a pillar!

Eyewitness Accounts Refute Drunken Driver Story!
Drunk driving is commonly associated with a vehicle weaving erratically across the road, but according to multiple eyewitness accounts the only weaving and erratic driving that night was done by a motorbike seating two riders, and a small vehicle in front of Diana's Mercedes which forced Henri Paul to brake and finally take the left lane to overtake said vehicle. These were also the two vehicles widely believed to have induced the accident. Read more about that here.

Not a single one of the several eyewitnesses that night state that the Mercedes was moving erratically or in a fashion suggesting that the driver was drunk.

In fact for a "drunk driver", Henri Paul showed remarkable driving skills! As the Mercedes approached the tunnel entrance the car in front started braking dangerously and performing other hazardous maneuvers such that Henri Paul deemed it best to accelerate and overtake it (actions not consistent with a man as intoxicated as Henri Paul was supposed to be according to the official report.

Unfortunately a 16-meter skid mark which was quite possibly the best evidence to irrefutably determine whether Henri Paul was driving drunk (or not) was (as seemed to be the norm in this case) suspiciously cleaned up hours after the crash before professionals could examine it (and thus determine whether it was a skid mark as a result of a controlled braking or an out-of-control one)!

But if Henri Paul was truly drunk, the only time that he appeared to manifest such symptoms would have been when the Mercedes S280 smashed into the 13^th central pillar of the Point d'Alma tunnel. But alas…we will never truly know!

What we do know is that at the Ritz Hotel he parked competently and without incident. When he pulled away from the Ritz Hotel at 12.20 a.m. hotly pursued by a pack of ravenous paparazzi and assassins he drove decisively and quickly never showing the slightest signs of drunkenness that the masterminds of the plot so cowardly fabricated as his legacy (plenty of witnesses, video footage as well as photos can corroborate this fact)!

Bottom Line: That Henri Paul was drunk and responsible for the crash is nothing more than a grossly fabricated story concocted by the plotters and reinforced by a gullible (and in some cases collaborative) press plus media to confuse an emotionally distraught public!

Princess Diana Death: Reconstructing What Happened From Eyewitness Accounts!

2007-07-19T19:37:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: Five Minutes On The Road To Eternity!

My previous post listed a number of eyewitness accounts that glaringly contradicted the official account and report of what happened! Click here to read it!

On this post I am going to reconstruct from the sample of eyewitness accounts what I believe happened that fateful night:

August 31, 1997, the night that Princess Diana died is much shrouded in controversy and conflicting reports about what really happened. In fact there’s so much inconsistency over the events of that night, about the only aspect that isn’t under contention is the fact that at 12.20 a.m. in the night, Diana and Dodi in a chauffeured Mercedes with bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones riding shotgun left the Paris Ritz Hotel and barely five minutes later at 12.25 a.m. were involved in a fatal car crash!

To date the official report still cites the crash as nothing more than a tragic traffic accident, notwithstanding the very many eyewitness reports that poke glaring and substantial holes in that report! With respect to some of the eyewitness accounts here is a reconstruction of what may have really happened that night:

Flushing The Prey Out Into The Open!

For some inexplicable reason, Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana decided not to spend the night at the Ritz Hotel in Paris (which incidentally was owned by Mohammed Al Fayed) where they were dining, but instead opted to brave the howling and ravenous pack of paparazzi circling outside the hotel, by making a dash for Dodi’s apartment located on Rue Arsene-Houssaye.

This in of itself was a very strange decision because from the moment they’d arrived in Paris from Sardinia on August 30^th, they were incessantly hounded and harassed by paparazzi! In fact people were later to remark they had never seen paparazzi behave so aggressively (were some of those aggressive paparazzi really security agents (MI6) setting the stage for what was to come later?). Thus it is of vital importance to know what made Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed leave the safety and comfort of the Ritz Hotel to brave the paparazzi outside? Could it have been some security concern concocted by the plotters in an attempt to flush out their prey towards the trap they’d set?

Springing The Trap

Assuming that Diana and Dodi were headed for Dodi's apartment the quickest route would have been to take the Place de la Concorde but according to several witnesses that route was blocked by a car full of paparazzi (quite likely that car was full of security agents whose job was to make sure that Princess Diana's Mercedes took their desired route, i.e., into the tunnel. Thierry H was one such witness who saw a car filled with men blocking the Mercedes' access to the Place de la Concorde.

Click Here To See Photo of Point d'Alma Tunnel Entrance

Motorbike And Unknown Car Force Mercedes Into Left Lane!

Brenda Wells, a secretary from London who went missing shortly after giving her statement to the French Police, said that as she approached the Point d'Alma Tunnel she was run off the road by a large powerful motorbike ridden by two individuals. Two other witnesses who, quite understandably chose to remain anonymous, were quoted by the newspaper Journal du Dimanche on September 9, 1997 as having witnessed the following:

Witness One: "The Mercedes was driving on the right hand, shortly before the entry of the tunnel, preceded by a dark-colored automobile, of which make I cannot say. This car clearly was attempting to force the Mercedes to brake . . . The driver of the Mercedes veered into the left-hand lane, and then entered the tunnel.''

Witness Two: "The Mercedes was traveling behind another automobile. I believe that the reason the Mercedes accelerated so suddenly, was to try to veer into the left lane, and pass that car.''

Motorbike Weaved From Left Then To The Right!

Both of the anonymous witnesses mentioned above state that the thing that first drew their attention in the direction of the Point d'Alma was the sound of a powerful engine gunning…the sound a vehicle might make when shifting into low gear as if to overtake. And indeed that is precisely what Henri Paul appeared to do when the car in front forced him to brake. He gunned the engine and moved into the left lane to pass the suspicious car in front (could this be the black car that vanished witness Brenda Wells mentioned in her statement to the French police?)

Brenda Well's statement also (significantly) distinguishes the powerful motorbike with two riders as being the only bike at that point in time behind Princess Diana's Mercedes. According to her account it was only after the crash that the rest of the paparazzi pack turned up!

So now Princess Diana's Mercedes is in the left lane and speeding very fast towards the tunnel, almost as if the driver and occupants feared for their lives…suggesting what they had just experienced was not normal paparazzi behavior.

Witnesses who were inside the tunnel at the time, also speak of a large powerful motorbike ridden by two individuals that raced up to the Mercedes on the left side, then pulled ahead slightly before swerving to the right of the Mercedes abruptly. At that point many of the witnesses claim they then saw a very bright flash of light followed by a tremendous bang! Two such witnesses were Francoise and Valerie Levistre who were driving ahead of Princess Diana's limousine in the tunnel.

Interpretation

It is a well documented fact that Princess Diana's Mercedes slammed into the thirteenth pillar of the tunnel before bouncing off and smashing into the wall like a pinball; the narrow confinement and speeds involved increased the chances of fatalities.

Here's my interpretation of what happened:

1. Just before entering the tunnel the mysterious car in front of the Mercedes starts braking dangerously alarming Henri Paul who accelerates and veers to the left to overtake it. This was actually what the plotters desired, to get the Mercedes in the left lane.

2. The powerful motorbike with the two riders cuts off Brenda Wells preventing her from entering the tunnel at this crucial point (the fewer witnesses the better). The motorbike then surges forwards and quickly catches up with the Mercedes, squeezes between the Mercedes and the central pillars of the tunnel before pulling slightly ahead and swerving suddenly and dangerously to the right.

3. At this point Henri Paul, like most anybody else, would instinctively steer the Mercedes left to avoid the motorbike. But just at that moment the rider on the back of the motorbike used a laser strobe light which illuminated the previously dark tunnel with a brilliant white flash that blinded Henri Paul and everyone else in the Mercedes.

4. After the flash from the strobe light Henri Paul was temporarily and completely blinded but the image of the motorbike dangerously close in front on the right of the Mercedes would have been engraved in his mind so he would have continued his leftward drift towards the center of the tunnel in hopes of avoiding the bike.

At this stage witnesses tell of hearing a loud bang! Could this have been a remote-controlled detonation that completely incapacitated the controls of the Mercedes effectively rendering all navigation impossible?

5. Henri Paul, despite being blinded, probably tried to make navigational corrections to ensure that the Mercedes somehow didn't slam into that concrete pillars in the center of the tunnel…and this is where the Fiat Uno came into play. This was the same car witnessed by Souad Mouffakir and her husband, who were in the tunnel at the time, moments before and after the crash. According to them the Fiat Uno had come from behind accelerating very rapidly and closing up to them as though it were about to overtake, but instead slowed down parallel to their car (inches away) almost as if the driver was waiting for something.

He was…he was waiting for Princess Diana's Mercedes.

The Fiat Uno's job was probably to ram the Mercedes ensuring that it collided with the column of the tunnel; in fact such a scenario pretty much reflects what Mouffakir said she saw. So in essence the Fiat Uno was the insurance policy…the finisher as it were. The job of the Fiat Uno driver was to make certain that the Mercedes slammed into the pillar!

6. The dozen or so men seen loitering in the tunnel moments before the crash by record producer Jacques Morel, were probably the clean-up crew. Their task was to tidy up the loose ends and make sure the scene reflected the accident scenario they had gone to great lengths to create.

In all likelihood one of those men was the individual seen by a number of witnesses leaping out of the wreckage of the Mercedes as they got closer. He could have well been the man who removed Henri Paul's head of the blaring horn and this could also have been the very individual who introduced the lethal levels of carbon monoxide as well as alcohol found in Henri Paul's bloodstream (to make the accident look like the mistake of a drunk)!

The rest of the clean-up crew were probably involved in crowd control and quite likely employed to add more confusion to an already confused scene. Indeed witnesses Mike Walker, Tom Richardson and Joanna Luz were discouraged from entering the tunnel immediately after the crash by a man screaming the car was going to explode (hmmm…sounds like crowd control to me.) Some witnesses also claim there was an individual dressed as a fireman on scene well before emergency vehicles arrived! I

Stanley Culbreath a tourist from the US described the inordinately long delay before anyone tried to free Princess Diana. Of the one policeman he saw there, this is what he had to say: "It was at least 15 minutes before an ambulance arrived and the one policeman who was there made no attempt to help anyone who was in that wreck…"

Yup! It sure sounds like those men seen loitering about the tunnel a few minutes before the crash certainly had their roles figured out. Some of them probably changed into police uniforms and other emergency /fire crew uniforms to discourage anyone from attempting to help the victims (classic crowd control)!

Princess Diana Death: Eye Witness Accounts Dispute Official Story!

2007-07-18T18:09:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash:What The Witnesses Saw!

After dining at the Ritz Hotel Dodi's and Princess Diana's intention was to head back to Dodi's flat located at Rue Arsene-Houssaye. The shortest and quickest way to get there would have been to turn onto the Place de la Concorde and then make their way along the Avenue de Champ Elysees. But for some reason they didn't take this most obvious of routes but took the one that lead the Mercedes through the Point d'Alma tunnel...why was that?

A Trap Is Set And Sprung!
(It should be noted that some of the witnesses' surnames are not available because of the very real fear they had at the time that they would meet an untimely death!)

Thierry H: He saw a car blocking the exit that would have allowed Princess Diana's Mercedes to take the Place de la Concorde and thus avoid the tunnel at Point d'Alma. The car had several men and Thierry's assumption at the time was that those men were paparazzi (but were they really?).

Brenda Wells: The secretary from London who "reportedly went missing" following her statement to the French police. She told them that on her way home from a party with friends, she was forced off the road by a large and powerful motorbike ridden by two individuals as she approached the tunnel. The motorbike was tailing Princess Diana's limo at high speed, in conjunction with another smaller car (Fiat Uno? Although her account describes this car as dark colored). In her own words: "After a party with my friends, I was returning to my home. A motorbike with two men forced me off the road. It was following a big car. Afterwards in the tunnel there were very strong lights like flashes. After that, a black car arrived. The big car had come off the road. I stopped and five or six motorbikes arrived and started taking photographs."

The whereabouts of Brenda Wells are currently unknown but what is known is that soon after giving her statement to the French Police and after both she and her husband were warned to go into hiding and never speak about what they had witnessed…PHUT! Just like that she vanished…fell off the face of the earth!

Francoise & Valerie Levistre: Since they were driving in front of the Diana Mercedes they were strategically located to bear close witness to what exactly happened in the tunnel. The following account was recorded by Reuters on September 4th, 1997 from their home in Normandy France:

"I said to my wife that there must be a big shot behind us with a police escort. Then I went down into the tunnel and, again in my rearview mirror I saw the car in the middle of the tunnel with the motorcycle on its left, pulling ahead and then swerving to the right directly in front of the car…as the motorcycle swerved and before the car lost control, there was a flash of light but then I was out of the tunnel and, but did not see the impact…I immediately pulled my car over to the curb but my wife said 'Let's get out of here. It's a terror attack.'" (Reuters, Paris, Sourced from Internet 4/9/97).

Levistre also described the motorbike as being ridden by two individuals.

Gaelle L: Gaelle and her boyfriend Benoit were approaching the tunnel from the opposite direction in the opposing lane on the other side of the tunnel. Here's her account: "As we entered the Alma tunnel, we heard a loud noise of screeching tires. At that moment, in the opposite lane, we saw a large car approaching at high speed. The car swerved to the left, then went back to the right and crashed into the wall with its horn blaring. I should note that in front of this car, there was another smaller car. I think this vehicle was black, but I'm not sure. Behind the big car there was a large motorcycle. I can't be sure how many riders were on it."

Witness Saw Fiat Uno Driver Cause Crash That Killed Princess Diana!

Souad Mouffakir: Far too terrified in1997 to truthfully report what she (and her husband of the time) witnessed in the tunnel, six years after the crash, Souad recanted her earlier testimony with the following damning account! She stated, quite understandably, that she'd remained silent for six years about what she witnessed because she'd feared for her life. Her story was narrated to The People (note no money changed hands for the story).

Souad Mouffakir claims that she and her husband (Mohamed Medjahdi) were in a car that was traveling right in front of Princess Diana's Mercedes in the tunnel on the night of August 31, 1997. Through the rear window she noticed a Fiat Uno approaching them very rapidly, but rather than overtake them it slowed down so that both cars were parallel.

As Souad put it, "It was very strange behavior and I got frightened. The white car was only centimeters from ours. I stared over to the driver and I will never forget him." She then continues to describe how the man's demeanor and manner appeared very strange as if his thoughts were far…far away. She describes the man as being of Mediterranean descent and that she surmised he was short because his head barely cleared the steering wheel. In the back seat of the car sat what she described as a huge Alsatian.

She continues, "I became very scared, I thought he was a madman and I told Mohamed to speed away. We did that and a moment later we heard the screech of tyres. I looked round and saw a black Mercedes sliding out of control at 45 degrees, coming straight at us. I saw the car impact into the pillar. I did not realize that I had just seen the crash that killed Diana. I saw the chauffeur thrown forward in to the steering wheel. I knew he had been killed immediately." (Note: text in quote marks was sourced The People interview.)

Click here to read her actual words.

Plotters Knew Beforehand That Diana and Company Would Pass Through The Tunnel!
Jacques Morel: Moments before the crash, record producer Jacques Morel says he saw several figures (about a dozen) hanging out in the tunnel for no apparent reason. Driving home with his wife on that night this is how he described the peculiar scene: " As we entered the Alma tunnel I looked to my left and saw about a dozen shady figures on a tiny pavement by the side of the opposite carriageway…They were all standing in a long line. The sight was unforgettable. The pavement is less than 30cm (12in or 1ft) wide and next to fast traffic. They would have been breathing in petrol fumes and it was very dirty down there. It was certainly not a sensible place to stand around."

Mr. Morel continues, "There was an almighty bang and a great big flash of light. Immediately my wife and I realized there had been a crash. My first thought was that those inside the tunnel were connected with what had happened. This thought has never left me!"

Like several other witnesses who also feared for their lives, Mr. Morel only broke his silence after several years had elapsed since the accident. Evidently his testimony was taken seriously enough to warrant being flown to London for a 3-day interview by the Diana Crash Investigatory (Inquiry) Team headed by former Scotland Yard chief, Lord Stevens.

Jacques Morel told detectives he was convinced that Henri Paul was part of the plot and had been paid to take the tunnel; as he put it, "I am certain he was paid to drive through the Alma Tunnel. There was cash in Henri Paul's pocket when he was found dead!" We can only assume that when he refers to "cash", Mr. Morel is talking about substantial amounts.

Gary Hunter: This London-based lawyer observed, from his third floor hotel room overlooking the Point d'Alma tunnel (less than 100 yards distance) two vehicles zooming away from the tunnel shortly after the crash. This is his account as cited by Agence-France-Presse on September 22, 1997: "I was in my hotel room overlooking the tunnel and heard a car speeding from that direction…I jumped up and saw a small dark-colored car drive up the street with another car practically stuck to its back bumper…the first car looked like a Fiat Uno or a Renault Clio. The white car was a Mercedes…they both spun round together and sped off down the street at a suicidal pace, more than 100 miles per hour…I thought it was very strange that they were traveling so dangerously close to each other…their behavior made me wonder what exactly they had been up to in the tunnel when the crash happened!"

"My own feeling is that these were people in a hurry not to be there. I am confident that the car was getting off the scene, it looked quite sinister."

SUMMARY: These are just a few of the many eyewitness accounts that punched meteor shower like holes into the official story, that the crash that killed Dodi Fayed, Princess Diana and Henri Paul, was nothing but a tragic traffic accident!

Coming Tomorrow: Interpreting And Reconstructing From The Eyewitness Accounts What May Have Actually Happened.

Princess Diana Death: A Very Bizarre Break-In

2007-07-15T04:52:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: Dead Paparazzi's Offices Burgled!
Almost exactly one month after Jean Paul Andanson's burnt body was discovered, on June 16, 2000 a rather strange break-in took place at the Paris offices of The Sipa Press Agency; which coincidentally happened to be the office where Andanson worked at the time of his death.

The break-in was remarkable for the fact its duration was a staggering 3 hours! (Yeah...yeah…I know, I evidently love that word staggering). This is how it went down:

On June 16, 2000 three masked and armed men shot the security guard at the Sipa Paris offices in the foot (at least they were considerate about the whole collateral damage issue) before storming the interior of the building. Sipa is a 24-hour Press Agency so you can bet that there were people at the office! Matter of fact, there were, but this didn't faze the armed invaders at all; they went right ahead and proceeded to conduct their robbery with hostages on hand.

What Did The Robbers Steal?

The assailants quickly located a very specific number of offices out of the multitude within the premises (the Sipa Paris office had more than 200 employees) and quickly gathered a number of items which included cameras, laptops, and hard drives from various desktop computers. The men were methodical and highly organized; evidently this was no spur of the moment burglary and definitely not amateur time!

In spite of the time spent collecting their loot and containing the hostages, the men were always composed and apparently unconcerned about any intervention from the authorities. In fact one witness (hostage) later remarked that "It was as though the robbers worked for the government…they were absolutely unconcerned that they would get caught or that the police might come."

A number of other hostages concluded that these were no ordinary crooks and indeed accounts of their conduct within the Sipa offices would tend to corroborate such observations:

1. The men were highly organized and methodical and only restricted their search and gathering activities to specific offices;

2. Despite the extensive duration required to gather what they had gone to get, the men never showed any trace of concern that they might be interrupted by the authorities (hmmm…could they have been French Secret Service?); and

3. The items they left with had a common thread…they were devices used for taking images (cameras) or devices that could be used to store digital images (laptops and hard drives).

What Andanson Possessed Could Have Unraveled The Carefully Weaved Tapestry Of The Plot!

The very obvious and only conclusion that one can draw from this event is that the robbers wanted to get their hands on any photos that Andanson may have had concerning the crash that killed Princess Diana.

Quite possibly the theft from the other offices was merely a ruse to muddy the waters and divert attention from the fact that Andanson's office was the real target or perhaps the perpetrators were just covering all their bases by removing any and all hard drives where Andanson could have stored such images (i.e., on a colleague's or close friend's computer as insurance).

Just to reiterate:

1) Forensic evidence put Andanson's white Fiat Uno at the scene of the Paris crash (it was identified beyond any doubt as the car that clipped the Mercedes in the tunnel before screeching away);

2) A few days before his death Andanson had started mouthing off how he was in possession of sensational never-before-seen footage of the Diana crash.

3) Andanson's white Fiat Uno was indeed the car seen by several witnesses chasing Princess Diana's limousine into the tunnel before the crash, then seen speeding away from the tunnel after a loud bang.

All the evidence tends to suggest that Andanson was a big liability to the authors of the plot for it appeared he was in possession of very very compromising photos that could unthread the carefully crafted tapestry of the plot!

Why Kill Andanson Three Years After The Crash?

2007-07-11T07:32:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Conspiracy Theory: Motive Behind Paparazzi Andanson's Death
According to colleagues and close friends of Andanson, in the weeks before his death he had been bragging about how he'd gotten hold of sensational shots of the crash and final moments of Princess Diana in the tunnel. To those around him, it was quite obvious that Jean-Paul Andanson had every intention of selling those photos to the highest bidder.

Evidently when tale of his activities filtered down to the ears of the masterminds behind the accident-assassination, their response was quick, simple and decisive…Andanson had to go! I mean it just wouldn't do to have a loose cannon like Andanson shouting his mouth off and raking simmering coals whose flames were on the verge of being extinguished forever!

And besides, Andansons's alibi was already on very flimsy ground! If those photos got out inevitably questions would be asked; questions like "How Did He Get Them?"

For a man who was not even supposed to have been in Paris at the time of the crash (according to the statement he'd given the French Police 3 years earlier) these were fiery questions that had no place being stoked. In fact such questions could bring the whole fragile house of cards (the plot) crashing down!

Thus the decision was simple…Andanson simply had to die!

What Possessed Andanson To Break The Code Of Silence?

What could have possessed Andanson to start mouthing off the way he did when given a little more time the crash in Paris would have been nothing more than a distant memory to the public (well mostly) .

Know what I think...me thinks it all boils down to two words:

Greed & Complacency; two common weaknesses characteristic of the human state!

Quite likely after three years Andanson felt that the heat had simmered down enough, but that in itself was probably not the decisive factor that made him overly cocky. Perhaps it was the impossibly irresistible urge to share with someone...anyone...the singular part he'd played in unarguably one of the most dramatic assassinations of the 20th century...

...or maybe he found himself in desperate need of some quick hard cash so why not capitalize on that goldmine he was sitting on...surely enough time had elapsed!

Evidently enough time had not elapsed and it is amply clear that by allowing his vanity to get the better of his professionalism Andanson paid the ultimate price!

Princess Diana Crash: The Strange Movements Of Paparazzi Andanson On The Night Of The Crash!

2007-07-10T18:36:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana: Paparazzi Connection
Mohammed Fayed, Dodi's father has long insisted that there were a number of Secret Service agents from varying spy agencies around the globe, namely M16 and the French Secret Service DGSE that had infiltrated the ranks of the Paparazzi stalking Princess Diana and Dodi. This actually does not come as too much of a surprise considering that the Crown naturally wanted to be kept abreast of the going-ons of the wayward princess before she sprung the next "embarrassment." One such paparazzo was Jean-Paul Andanson, the late owner of the Fiat Uno seen speeding away from the crash!

Uno Owner's Suspicious Movements On The Night Princess Diana Died!

When one thinks about it infiltrating the paparazzi with agents was a brilliant yet obvious concept. As a paparazzi, an agent would have a legitimate reason to be hot on the tail of Princess Diana and her entourage. Also posing as a member of the paparazzi afforded any infiltrator the a good cover of anonymity. But most importantly posing as a member of the paparazzi enabled easy access to the princess!

As previously mentioned on May 5th of 2000 Jean-Paul Andanson was found burned to a crisp in the charred wreckage of his one-time white Fiat Uno. Consequent forensic tests conducted on the Fiat Uno proved beyond a shadow of doubt that his car was indeed the one that collided with the Mercedes Benz in the tunnel!

But of course in 1997 none of this had come to light...or had it and was it just conveniently ignored!

French Police Bungling In The Manner Of Inspector Jacques Clouseau

What is now known is that Andanson was up and down the Mediterranean close on the heels of the vacationing Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana. Certainly on the day that Dodi and Diana flew back to Paris (August 30th) Andanson was there. But for no apparent reason or at any rate reasons best known to himself before dawn on August 31, 1997, a scant 6 hours after the Diana crash Andanson left Paris via a flight from Orly Airport bound for Corsica!

So what exactly was he doing? Was it coincidence or was Andanson creating his alibi...certainly looks that way to me!

So what was his alibi other than his weak claim that he was not in Paris at the time of the crash? Andanson's only proof that he was not in Paris the night of the crash was a receipt for gasoline purchase elsewhere in France (yeah right...anybody could come up with that!) Weak as his alibi was, compounded with the fact that he owned a white Fiat Uno, one would think that the French police would have taken more of an interest in Mr. Andanson and his whereabouts on the night of the crash.

But no they were more than satisfied with his flimsy gasoline receipt alibi and furthermore quickly concluded that his White Fiat Uno was not the one involved in the crash! Andanson's family initially backed up his claims of being elsewhere on the night of the crash, his wife Elizabeth going as far as to claim that she had been with her husband all night at their country home, Le Manoir de la Bergerie in Cher. She did concede that Jean-Paul abruptly departed for Orly Airport aound 3.45 a.m.

In later years on further questioning Elizabeth Andanson admitted she could have been mistaken about her Husband's whereabouts on that night, that apparently his job as a paparazzi had him always on the go! As for Andanson's kids, a son James and daughter Kimberley, they told the police they were under the impression their father was grape-harvesting in the Bordeaux region!

Coming Tomorrow: What could have been the motive behind killing Andanson three years after the crash? What could have possessed Andanson to break the code of silence

Princess Diana: Paparazzi Identified As Owner Of Car That Rammed Mercedes!

2007-07-08T18:38:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana: The Suspicious Movements Of White Fiat Uno On The Night Of The Crash
On May 5, 2000, a badly burned body with a bullet hole neatly drilled in to the head was discovered in some woods in Nantes not far from Paris, France. A series of month long DNA tests finally concluded beyond any doubt whatsoever that those charred remains belonged to Jean-Paul Andanson a member of the paparazzi who had been stalking Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed up and down the Mediterranean.

Who Was The Mysterious Jean-Paul Andanson?

So who was Jean Paul Andanson?

Described by some as the original godfather of modern day paparazzi, Andanson was a hard hitting, flamboyant self-styled photographer who specialized in celebrity shots. By the time of his death at age 54 his photography had made him into a millionaire.

For sure Andanson was not the only paparazzi hounding the ill-fated couple on August 31, 1997, but what makes Jean-Paul stand out was the fact that he owned a white Fiat Uno!

Was Andanson's White Fiat Uno The Car That Rammed The Mercedes In The Tunnel?

Okay let's clear up one little point here...just because he owned a white Fiat Uno doesn't mean that Andanson's Fiat Uno was indeed the car seen streaking from the tunnel shortly after the crash. After all there had to be at least thousands of other White Unos whirring their way around Paris. But...

Andanson's Fiat Uno hid a dirty little secret!

Not only was it repainted soon after the events of that fateful August 31st night in 1997 (hmmmm...could this be coincidence) forensic evidence determined beyond any doubt that the car in which Jean-Paul Andanson's charred remains were found was definitely the vehicle which clipped Princess Diana's Mercedes!

Investigators determined that this was the wanted car by matching paint-scratch traces found on the side view mirror of the Mercedes to paint traces found on the Fiat Uno! They achieved this by spectrographically analyzing the various absorption bands of the different paints!

Tomorrow: How could investigators commit such a major bloop in their handling of the initial investigation? In a bungling fiasco worthy of a Michael Moore docudrama how did the French Police come to the conclusion that Andanson was driven to suicide because of his wife's indiscretions? Why was Andanson really killed...was it his chutzpah that finally brought him to this grisly end of the road! How could this unbreakable trend of investigatory bungling have continued unabated?

Princess Diana Crash: Prime Suspect Found Burnt To A Crisp!

2007-07-07T02:38:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: Mystery of The White Fiat Uno

"We heard a loud bang then moments later we saw a white Fiat Uno and a motorbike racing out of the tunnel at high speed!" Those were the damning words of several eyewitnesses to the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, Henri Paul and seriously injured bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones.

Yet in spite of those eyewitness claims the authorities on both sides of the channel still stuck to the story that the accident was precisely that…a tragic accident!

HELLO REALITY CHECK! The only reason someone guns away from the scene of an accident is because they were involved in some manner or otherwise have something to hide. But did the authorities take this into consideration? Noooo…they were pursuing a different agenda!

3 Years After Princess Diana Crash Mysterious White Fiat Uno Finally Found!

Where was the white Fiat Uno? What happened to the white Fiat Uno? Who was the owner of the white Fiat Uno? These were the questions that constantly dogged the French Police and British authorities; egged on by an angry Mohammed Fayed (father of Dodi Fayed) who from the get-go always contended that the crash was a carefully conceived plot to kill his son and the princess.

Despite what some claimed to be the manhunt of the century and biggest police dragnet in French history, the driver and the white Fiat Uno were never found …that is until May 5, 2000 when someone stumbled across the burned wreckage of a small vehicle in the woods in Nantes, a place not far from Paris.

Within the wreckage was the charred remains of what once used to be human. The body was burned to such an extent that it took police almost one month of DNA testing before they could determine that those charred broiled remains were what was left of one Jean-Paul Andanson, one-time proud owner of a white Fiat Uno!

Owner Of White Fiat Uno Shoots Himself To Death…After 1st Burning Himself To Death!

No, the above headline is not an error neither did you read it wrong!

According to the French Police and The Mail On Sunday (newspaper in England) Andanson apparently was so aggrieved over his wife cheating on him that he of all things decided to commit suicide by fire! Funny though, there was no mention of the bullet neatly drilled into his head…which kinda puzzles me; how could a dead man rattle 'n' shake his crisp-fried bones and smokin' tissue to shoot himself in the head?

Hmmmm…I dunno about you but to me it sure looks like someone wanted Jean-Paul Andanson very very dead…that's why I'm going with the theory that somebody or somebodies had themselves a right-ole-merry barbecue in the middle of the forest where the main dish was crispy-fried human…or Jean-Paul Andanson to be exact!

So the question remains, unless Andanson was somehow connected with the crash in the tunnel why would parties unknown go to such lengths to silence him. Was he after all the owner of the much-witnessed and very notorious white Fiat Uno seen screeching out of the tunnel like a bat-outta-hell, or was he just another unfortunate coincidence in a series of never ending coincidences surrounding the Princess Diana Crash!

Coming Tomorrow: Was Andanson the owner of the white Fiat Uno that rammed Mercedes in the tunnel? Where and what was he doing on the night of the crash? And why would anyone want to frame his death as a suicide?

Princess Diana Crash: The Realm Of Reasonable Doubt.

2007-07-02T02:03:00.000-07:00

Princess Diana Crash: The Realm Of Reasonable

Historically Britain and France have over the ages squared off as enemies who from time to time, when the occasion so demanded, joined together in an uneasy alliance to pursue a common goal. Strong circumstantial evidence tends to suggest that such an occasion did indeed arise on August 31, 1997 when Princess Diana was killed.

Paris: Romantic City To Lovers; Convenient Killing Spot To Others

One of the more controversial aspects concerning the night Princess Diana died was the fact that it took just shy of two hours to drive her to a hospital that was merely 3.25 miles away? This issue is one amongst many smoking guns that conspiracy theorists are quick to whip out from their arsenal as evidence that what happened in the Pont de l'Alma road tunnel in Paris that night was anything but an accident!

So assuming that the crash was indeed no ordinary accident but rather a high profile assassination made to look like one, it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume whoever carried it out did thorough research beforehand. Such research would likely entail finding a location with restricted access points and also one that was fairly obscured from public view; a long enough tunnel would cover these two very necessary characteristics beautifully. Staging a late night crash also guaranteed that there were less unwanted eyeballs around to eyeball that which they were not supposed to see.

With just two entry/exit points, a tunnel affords easy control to incoming and outgoing traffic if ever the need were to arise. An accident in a tunnel also offers other advantages from an assassin's perspective. If the assassination is to be in the form of a road traffic accident (RTA) the chances of success are hugely magnified if a high velocity collision is staged in a confined area like a tunnel. A high speed accident in a place like the Paris Pont de l'Alma road tunnel would almost certainly result in the vehicle being buffeted from concrete wall to concrete wall over and over again like a pinball in an arcade game. Such a multiple-impact scenario greatly increases the chances of killing the target yet still allows room for the event to be termed a tragic accident!

An accident staged in Paris had other attractions too.

Other than the obvious that Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were already there and had made little secret of the fact that they intended to spend an enchanted evening in La Capitale Romance Du Monde (Paris), the other very attractive feature about France (from the plotters' perspective) was the rather unusual French ambulance evacuation policy.

In the wake of much finger pointing, recriminations, and accusations over the now infamous 2-hour ambulance ride, the French authorities (backed up by their British counterparts) went to great lengths to assure everyone that there was nothing suspicious about it at all. That in fact that was just the way it was done in France! Okay, granted that the ambulance policy in France may actually require that accident victims be stabilized at the scene, you can bet that the people behind the plot were well aware of that fact too. It is quite probable that whilst brainstorming various scenarios on how, where and when to execute the assassination, someone in the conspiracy stumbled across that unusual French policy and immediately saw its value as a tool for deflecting suspicion from a situation that would otherwise scream nothing but!

Blaming The Usual Suspects

In the this vein one can see why such an "accident" could not have been pulled off in England; The ambulance evacuation policy in the United Kingdom (Britain) like most other countries is radically different from that in France; namely that it requires a seriously injured victim to be rushed to hospital as expeditiously as possible where far better care may be administered. Besides, staging the crash in France gave the plot originators another very convenient patsy; albeit a complicit one!

Giving a distraught and hysterical British public someone to blame (who better than those dastardly French) not only took care of a very necessary emotional outlet, it also minimized the possibility of an immediate under-the-microscope investigation that would certainly have ensued had Princess Diana been killed in England. Having the French handle the investigation on French soil conveniently allowed any accusations of ineptness and bungling to rest squarely on the shoulders of the French.

Such a course of action could only work however as long as the necessary French security agencies were privy to the plot. It is unimaginable to believe that the French authorities would ever agree to shoulder the blame for an event of such magnitude unless various security agencies of theirs were complicit to the plot to some degree or other. If there had been no French involvement you can bet that the French secret service (DGSE) would have been the first to point fingers at the British secret service (MI6). In fact without the French connection it is highly improbably the entire event could have been pulled off at all.

As it was, the manner in which the plot was contrived ensured that the British public at least had the usual (dastardly) suspects to voice their anger against but most importantly it afforded the plotters multiple opportunities to confine their achievement firmly in the realm of reasonable doubt!

Tomorrow: Whatever happened to the mysterious white Fiat Uno that several witnesses claim to have seen speeding away from the accident in the tunnel! Were paparazzi really involved in any way in the plot to kill Princess Diana? What connection did the charred remains of a body found in some woods near Paris have to do with the accident that claimed Henri Paul's, Dodi Fayed's and Princess Diana's lives?