<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097</id><updated>2010-03-03T12:52:43.744-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Details</title><subtitle type='html'>Video, Social Media and the Internet: the What and Why</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>120</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-6642145471599809612</id><published>2010-03-03T12:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-03-03T12:52:01.316-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='naming'/><title type='text'>Domain Name Length Counts</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;When choosing a domain, or even a show/company/product name, keep in mind this fun fact: most popular domain name length worldwide is 11 characters (example.com is 7). So if yours is close to that it's good news for systems that recognize domain names and do things to make them more usable to users. For example, Twitter shortens &lt;acronym title="Uniform Resource Locator"&gt;URL&lt;/acronym&gt;s over a certain length by default, which does in part pass on Google &amp;quot;link juice&amp;quot; but not as effectively as an un-shortened &lt;acronym title="Uniform Resource Locator"&gt;URL&lt;/acronym&gt; (domain length data from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yafla.com/dennisforbes/Interesting-Facts-About-Domain-Names/Interesting-Facts-About-Domain-Names.html"&gt;yafla.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-6642145471599809612?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/6642145471599809612/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/03/domain-name-length-counts.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6642145471599809612'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6642145471599809612'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/03/domain-name-length-counts.html' title='Domain Name Length Counts'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-1326857005410357332</id><published>2010-02-17T12:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-17T12:15:30.132-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='persistence'/><title type='text'>Change, then What</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Hannah Arendt"&gt;The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;-Hannah Arendt&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In 2 years, when things have changed even more then they have already, will today's vanguard be the old establishment resisting further change? Might be good to keep your eye on the future, even as the present becomes what yesterday's future was.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-1326857005410357332?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/1326857005410357332/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/02/change-then-what.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/1326857005410357332'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/1326857005410357332'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/02/change-then-what.html' title='Change, then What'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-8044209003940119489</id><published>2010-02-16T09:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-16T09:20:00.532-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='persistence'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='win'/><title type='text'>Is The Game Really Changing?</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Darren Ewing"&gt;The game only appears to be changing. Network Executives aren't screwing things up any more than they always have screwed things up...it's just that we hear about it more now because of technology. When Cinema discovered that Television was taking over people's relaxation hours, the entire industry scrambled like morons to find its way. In the end, making movies evolved on it's own and all they needed to do was keep working.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Darren Ewing"&gt;It's the same with the internet. Together, we have to make shows and projects the same way we always have. We have to unify business, technological, and theatrically creative minds and point them all in the direction we want our projects to go&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://darrenewing.blogspot.com/2010/02/is-game-really-changing.html"&gt;Darren Ewing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-8044209003940119489?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/8044209003940119489/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/02/is-game-really-changing.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/8044209003940119489'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/8044209003940119489'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/02/is-game-really-changing.html' title='Is The Game Really Changing?'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-891478380990024442</id><published>2010-01-04T09:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-04T09:26:00.620-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social media'/><title type='text'>Social Media Marketing Explained in 61 Words</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="David Meerman Scott"&gt;&lt;!--You can buy attention (advertising)&lt;br /&gt;You can beg for attention from the media (PR)&lt;br /&gt;You can bug people one at a time to get attention (sales)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or --&gt;...you can earn attention by creating something interesting and valuable and then publishing it online for free: a YouTube video, a blog, a research report, photos, a Twitter stream, an ebook, a Facebook page&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.webinknow.com/2009/12/social-media-marketing-explained-in-61-words.html"&gt;WebInkNow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-891478380990024442?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/891478380990024442/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/01/social-media-marketing-explained-in-61.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/891478380990024442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/891478380990024442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2010/01/social-media-marketing-explained-in-61.php' title='Social Media Marketing Explained in 61 Words'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-5895608189168561903</id><published>2009-12-29T11:22:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-29T11:24:20.690-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='connecting'/><title type='text'>Connection Can't Be Detached</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Emily Woolf"&gt;We are all faced with clients that want to know ROI, that don't &amp;quot;get it&amp;quot; and I know that when I'm looking to educate these types of clients, every piece of data and every quote that supports my point of view comes in handy. So, here are the pieces I think will help me, and hopefully you in future decks and meetings:&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;q cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/"&gt;Simply put, digital brand experiences create customers.&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;q cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/"&gt;Our findings lead us to believe that marketers need to be dramatic...and not simply settle for awareness or impressions: engagement = affinity&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://shedorksout.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/razorfishs-most-recent-feed-study-the-bits-and-pieces-i-really-enjoyed/"&gt;she dorks out&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;). Off the cuff, by the way, and without fully thinking it through I'll say this: &amp;quot;engagement&amp;quot; is often another word for connecting with an audience, and &amp;quot;affinity&amp;quot; is a way to keep at arms length the idea of people liking you (or your brand). In both cases they seem to be accepted ways to gloss the audience's desire for human connection, and intimacy. While I understand the corporate reluctance to embrace things like intimacy, moving people emotionally can't really be done from a distance. Someone must take that risk, and if companies aren't willing to, perhaps they just choose to hire someone who will and hope it will still work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-5895608189168561903?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/5895608189168561903/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/12/connection-cant-be-detached.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/5895608189168561903'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/5895608189168561903'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/12/connection-cant-be-detached.php' title='Connection Can&apos;t Be Detached'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-81056953100744195</id><published>2009-11-24T13:51:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-24T13:51:54.156-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><title type='text'>Web Video: An Intermediate Case</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Jakob Nielsen"&gt;Video on the Web is an intermediate case between broadcast video (&lt;abbr title="television"&gt;TV&lt;/abbr&gt;) and page-based Web navigation. Preliminary data indicates that most Web videos should be short - typically 2–10 minutes - indicating a usage velocity between Web and &lt;abbr title="television"&gt;TV&lt;/abbr&gt;, but closer to the Web's velocity of one user decision every 10–120 seconds.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Jakob Nielsen"&gt;When you develop content, services, and designs for the Web, remember that this medium has a much faster velocity than older media, whether print or &lt;abbr title="television"&gt;TV&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/media-velocity.html"&gt;Velocity of Media Consumption: &lt;abbr title="television"&gt;TV&lt;/abbr&gt; vs. the Web&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-81056953100744195?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/81056953100744195/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/11/web-video-intermediate-case.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/81056953100744195'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/81056953100744195'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/11/web-video-intermediate-case.php' title='Web Video: An Intermediate Case'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-456196588000059148</id><published>2009-10-26T14:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-26T15:00:39.723-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fail'/><title type='text'>Yahoo Abandons More Than 20 Millions Pageviews (Closing Geocities)</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;5 years ago I paid 1/3 of my bills with a 1 page Geocities site. Today Yahoo takes more than 4.8 million &lt;a href="http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/geocities/close/"&gt;geocities pages offline permanently&lt;/a&gt;. That's about 11.9 million visitors a month, who made about 21,420,000 pageviews a month, now getting some sort of 404 or &amp;quot;we removed this page&amp;quot; site instead of what they expected (data from Quantcast and Alexa).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yahoo didn't make enough money with Geocities to keep it online because they didn't know how to, because they didn't try.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;5 years ago Yahoo stock was trading near $35, today it closed at $16.87, losing 2% of it's value today. It's a shame to see a company misstep as badly and often as Yahoo has, and I'll miss the opportunity to make money with them through their Geocities sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-456196588000059148?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/456196588000059148/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/yahoo-abandons-more-than-20-millions.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/456196588000059148'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/456196588000059148'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/yahoo-abandons-more-than-20-millions.php' title='Yahoo Abandons More Than 20 Millions Pageviews (Closing Geocities)'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-4303279343360061288</id><published>2009-10-23T09:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-23T09:01:00.203-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='connecting'/><title type='text'>19% of US Internet Users Tweet</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;Twitter and Facebook have been to big too ignore for sometime now. While &lt;a href="http://www.web-l.com/dave-tips/2009/01/traffic-estimates-for-others-sites.php"&gt;estimating pageviews of sites&lt;/a&gt; is inexact, some numbers help reveal just how big these 2 sites have become.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Stacy Straczynski"&gt;The army of Twitterers is growing quickly, per the Pew Internet Project report released today. The report found that 19 percent of all U.S. Internet users now use either Twitter or smaller services, such as Yammer, to share social updates. This was up 8 percent from the 11 percent who used such services in April 2009&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i209e6b1f462c1a58c1a4eb01519121cc"&gt;Adweek&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;). Things change quickly, and twitter is a big part of the audience, as is Facebook:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Perry Drake"&gt;In the US Facebook accounts for, now get this, &lt;strong&gt;1 in every 4 or 25% of our total pageviews&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://drakedirect.blogspot.com/2009/10/draft-facebook-article.html"&gt;Drake Direct&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;). Drake bases his numbers on compete.com data, which can be imperfect. &lt;a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com"&gt;Alexa estimates Facebook got about 4.5% of global pageviews&lt;/a&gt; in the last month. Suffice to say, big enough to be important to anyone doing anything online.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-4303279343360061288?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/4303279343360061288/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/19-of-us-internet-users-tweet.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4303279343360061288'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4303279343360061288'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/19-of-us-internet-users-tweet.php' title='19% of US Internet Users Tweet'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-1101520614203763537</id><published>2009-10-22T10:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-22T10:53:27.533-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><title type='text'>Search Comments on YouTube in Real-Time</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;YouTube's real-time search of comments may compete, someday, with Twitter for in-the-moment audience reaction to moving pictures.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Jamie Davidson"&gt;Comments Search moves into Test Tube, the place where our engineers and developers test out new features and gather data and feedback before pushing them out to a wider audience. This feature allows you to search the comments people are making on YouTube in real time. The full comment will appear on a continuously updated results page, and 'trending topics' indicates the hottest topics of conversation on YouTube at that particular moment&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2009/10/search-comments-on-youtube-in-real-time.html"&gt;YouTube Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-1101520614203763537?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/1101520614203763537/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/search-comments-on-youtube-in-real-time.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/1101520614203763537'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/1101520614203763537'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/search-comments-on-youtube-in-real-time.php' title='Search Comments on YouTube in Real-Time'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-6306335673353374778</id><published>2009-10-22T03:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-22T03:13:48.091-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fail'/><title type='text'>TV Windows Collapsing</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Sue Zeidler"&gt;Traditional television viewing patterns are collapsing and the industry needs to quickly figure out how to profit in a world where people can watch TV shows anytime, anywhere, NBC Universal's TV chief said.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Sue Zeidler"&gt;The challenge now was drawing viewers to network shows at designated times when people can either record those shows or turn to online outlets to watch at their convenience, said Marc Graboff, Chairman of NBC Entertainment and Universal Media Studios.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Sue Zeidler"&gt;Networks need to figure out how to make their content more immediately available in a lucrative way, such as by charging viewers to stream episodes shortly after airing - narrowing viewing 'windows' - or providing them to multiple outlets, he told an industry conference.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Sue Zeidler"&gt;The biggest U.S. networks are currently struggling with declining advertising revenue, dwindling viewership and rising production coasts [sic]&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com"&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;, via &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091020/tv_nm/us_nbcuniversal_graboff_3"&gt;Yahoo News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-6306335673353374778?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/6306335673353374778/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/tv-windows-collapsing.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6306335673353374778'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6306335673353374778'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/tv-windows-collapsing.php' title='TV Windows Collapsing'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-8639671274886312200</id><published>2009-10-09T00:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-09T01:05:22.348-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fail'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='connecting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='win'/><title type='text'>Hollywood's Present is Online</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;Many talk of online video as a wave of the future; they are flat wrong. It is now, right now. I know a government employee that 4 months ago discarded their TV and now watches only online. I know a lawyer that uses Tivo as an on-demand that in combination with online TV and DVDs doesn't watch broadcast, cable or satelite live, ever. I have never owned a television, yet I watched three shows tonight and also &lt;a href="http://www.davidaugust.com" title="My acting site which includes some of my TV credits and clips"&gt;appear on TV&lt;/a&gt; from time to time. Anyone who thinks online entertainment is a future, and denies it is a growing present tense event, is either not paying attention, about to lose their job or both. All things are more online and mobile than ever before and they are right now (I write this post on my phone; please forgive any spelling mistakes ;-).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.t5m.com/lisa-marks/hollywoods-future-is-in-bannens-hands.html/comment-page-1#comment-25"&gt;&amp;quot;Hollywood's future is in Bannen's hands&amp;quot; by Lisa Marks&lt;/a&gt; may be over selling a single show as some sort of vangard. I love that this show is being made and am excited to see it, but Sony is not first with web content that costs more than $1 million (Seth MacFarlane, Burger King and YouTube did that &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/18/business/media/18burger.html"&gt;over a year ago&lt;/a&gt;) and the CEO of Sony Pictures (parent of &lt;a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/05/15/sony-pictures-ceo-no.html"&gt;Crackle) said he "...doesn't see anything good having come from the Internet... Period.&lt;/a&gt;" This show may be Sony's late, half-supported-by-the-studio attempt to be in the now.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A month online is equal to a year offline, and to not learn from history a from a year ago (like 12 years online) is to retrace steps taken by many before, and risk being obselete before you've begun. In 3 months, &lt;a href="http://laacting.davidaugust.com/2008/10/millennials-will-be-biggest-audience-by.html"&gt;the generation referred to as digital natives will be the largest and most important demographic for entertainment&lt;/a&gt;. This demographic is already watching, listening and experiencing their entertainment where and when they want to and media companies are only just now pretending this will happen? That is like acting as if the wheel or fire might catch on when it's already the year 1500. People's careers and livelyhoods as employees and stockholders are suffering because of antiquated thinking (yes, 3 month old is antiquated). Get present or be irrelevant; there is no half way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-8639671274886312200?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/8639671274886312200/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/hollywoods-present-is-online.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/8639671274886312200'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/8639671274886312200'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/10/hollywoods-present-is-online.php' title='Hollywood&apos;s Present is Online'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-4427091696782259536</id><published>2009-09-21T21:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-21T21:38:46.771-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social media'/><title type='text'>Scarcity and Social Media</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;In social media and in fact online in general many are trying to create scarcity as they would in the off-line world.  This is a mistake that will, in pretty much every case, lead to destroying businesses and brands.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Seth Godin has written some interesting &lt;a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/07/scarcity.html"&gt;Principles of Scarcity&lt;/a&gt; and points out that with scarcity the &lt;q cite="Seth Godin"&gt;...danger is that you can kill long-term loyalty. You can annoy your best customers. You can spread negative word of mouth. You can train people to hate your scarcity strategy.&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-4427091696782259536?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/4427091696782259536/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/09/scarcity.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4427091696782259536'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4427091696782259536'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/09/scarcity.php' title='Scarcity and Social Media'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-4088456454859383094</id><published>2009-09-21T21:30:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-21T21:30:21.019-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='connecting'/><title type='text'>Signal to Noise Ratio for Social Networks and Social Media</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;The more the recipient wants the message you are sending, the better. As with all online communications, it is more important to send what they want to read/view/hear than to send what you want them to read/view/hear. This is by and large what being a good producer is in the offline world as well.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Typically a email list with a growing subscriber base only sends messages that make people want to subscribe and/or stay subscribers. It is the same with social network profiles. A social networking profile only communicates with its friends/connections/people-who-opted-in-and-gave-you-permission-to-communicate-with-them when the communication will make them want to remain your friend/connection or become your friend/connection.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I've heard people refer to doing an &amp;quot;email blast&amp;quot; to get the word out about something, or to try to connect with key bloggers or online influencers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As Seth Godin said:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Seth Godin"&gt;Don't bother engaging with customers unless you are prepared to invest enough to exceed expectations and delight them. It's better to do nothing at all.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;In social networking, your friends/connections/anyone you communicate with are your customers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;!--In audio technology, signal to noise ratio is the amount of desired sound there is in comparison unwanted sound, for instance how much background noise on a phone call with a loved one.  With too much background sound, the loved one is hard, or impossible to understand--&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-4088456454859383094?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/4088456454859383094/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/09/signal-to-noise-ratio-for-social.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4088456454859383094'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4088456454859383094'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/09/signal-to-noise-ratio-for-social.php' title='Signal to Noise Ratio for Social Networks and Social Media'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-9011036208789867163</id><published>2009-08-24T16:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-24T18:56:09.677-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social networking'/><title type='text'>Twitter Analysis Tools</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;Here are three useful sites for analyzing your tweets/twitter accounts:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tweetstats.com/"&gt;TweetStats&lt;/a&gt; - reveals frequency and timing of your twitter behavior&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter-friends.com/"&gt;TwitterFriends&lt;/a&gt; - examines how and who you connect with and converse with on twitter&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tweeteffect.com/"&gt;TweetEffect&lt;/a&gt; - shows what impact your tweets had on followers starting or stopping following you&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;These ought to be only used to organize the underlying realities of what you tweet. Getting lost in the numbers and graphs and forgetting it is about communication and people will not be good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-9011036208789867163?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/9011036208789867163/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/08/twitter-analysis-tools.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/9011036208789867163'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/9011036208789867163'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/08/twitter-analysis-tools.php' title='Twitter Analysis Tools'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-1416106631513367271</id><published>2009-06-16T01:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T01:42:02.372-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='explode content'/><title type='text'>Distribution Is Part of the Show</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Hugh MacLeod"&gt;Your plan for getting your work out there has to be as original as the actual work, perhaps even more so. The work has to create a totally new market. There's no point trying to do the same thing as 250,000 other young hopefuls, waiting for a miracle. All existing business models are wrong. Find a new one&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/000932.html"&gt;gapingvoid&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;). The old school way to put it is: The Medium is the Message. Perhaps I can help you figure out how to get your work out there /plug.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-1416106631513367271?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/1416106631513367271/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/distribution-is-part-of-show.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/1416106631513367271'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/1416106631513367271'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/distribution-is-part-of-show.php' title='Distribution Is Part of the Show'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-6580527029108662180</id><published>2009-06-13T12:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T12:20:19.800-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><title type='text'>Viewership Growing On YouTube</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="TubeMogul blog"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.viciousconcepts.com/details/uploaded_images/6-13-2009-tubemogul-thisone-720244.png"&gt;&lt;img style="width:360px;height:203px;" src="http://www.viciousconcepts.com/details/uploaded_images/6-13-2009-tubemogul-thisone-720244.png" alt="graph of top 100 new media/mid-tail video publishers' daily video views on YouTube summed by month from December to May"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt;Basically, we took the top 100 all-time most-viewed &amp;quot;mid-tail&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;new media studio&amp;quot; content creators (i.e. Next New Networks, Howcast Studios, The Wall Street Journal's videos etc.) and looked at their viewership growth. The results? &lt;strong&gt;Over the past six months, publishers saw their daily average views grow by an average of 4.98% per month&lt;/strong&gt;. Although there have been several recent failures in the space (60Frames, ManiaTV), overall the sector is growing in terms of viewership&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(emphasis added, from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tubemogul.com/blog/2009/06/mid-tail-new-media-viewership-growing-on-youtube/"&gt;TubeMogul's blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-6580527029108662180?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/6580527029108662180/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/viewership-growing-on-youtube.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6580527029108662180'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6580527029108662180'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/viewership-growing-on-youtube.php' title='Viewership Growing On YouTube'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-5397934057731780131</id><published>2009-06-13T12:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T12:03:05.142-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social media'/><title type='text'>Social Media Salaries</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Jim Durbin"&gt;There are no surprises, but I can tell you that consulting fees range from $20 an hour to $400 an hour, salaries range from $24,000 a year to $170,000, and the difference is based almost entirely on your non-social media employment background&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.socialmediaheadhunter.com/2008/11/social-media-sa.html"&gt;Social Media Headhunter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-5397934057731780131?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/5397934057731780131/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/social-media-salaries.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/5397934057731780131'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/5397934057731780131'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/social-media-salaries.php' title='Social Media Salaries'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-953153332149197437</id><published>2009-06-13T11:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T11:58:11.665-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social networking'/><title type='text'>Social Network Dominance by County</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;While now some months old, there is a &lt;a href="http://www.oxyweb.co.uk/blog/socialnetworks-oct08.png"&gt;map of the world with the dominant social network for each country shown&lt;/a&gt;. Might be useful as a starting point if trying to reach a given country's audience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-953153332149197437?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/953153332149197437/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/social-network-dominance-by-county.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/953153332149197437'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/953153332149197437'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/social-network-dominance-by-county.php' title='Social Network Dominance by County'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-2974141471030512966</id><published>2009-06-13T11:46:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T11:54:32.391-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='advertising'/><title type='text'>Page Rank Is Not What It Once Was</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;Google's pagerank is shown most commonly by the green bar in the Google toolbar in your browser (if you have it installed). While Wikipedia says this &lt;q cite="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank"&gt;...numeric weighting from 0-10 for each webpage on the Internet... denotes a site's importance in the eyes of Google,&lt;/q&gt; this is no longer true. &lt;strong&gt;Pagerank is now a deceptive, essentially useless number leading many to make bad decisions&lt;/strong&gt; (e.g., buying ads on sites based on pagerank, when foreseeable results will actually disappoint).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There was a time, a few years ago, that Google's pagerank was a great indicator of how much traffic Google would send to a site. After that traffic got to the site, the site would have a chance to connect with, or sell things to those visitors. That is no longer the case, &lt;a href="http://www.web-l.com/dave-tips/2009/01/page-rank-is-dead-long-live-page-rank.php"&gt;pagerank is no longer very important&lt;/a&gt; and like so many things online and in life, &lt;a href="http://www.viciousconcepts.com/details/2009/05/numbers-and-net.php"&gt;numbers aren't everything&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In all things, the shorthand of a number seems convenient, but is likely useless for revealing the most important truths (e.g., &amp;quot;I love my parents 72&amp;quot; is fairly meaningless).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-2974141471030512966?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/2974141471030512966/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/page-rank-is-not-what-it-once-was.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/2974141471030512966'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/2974141471030512966'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/page-rank-is-not-what-it-once-was.php' title='Page Rank Is Not What It Once Was'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-6887127953456478249</id><published>2009-06-13T11:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T11:37:06.851-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fail'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='win'/><title type='text'>Printed Newspapers Are Yesterday's News</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/77039/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-wed-jun-10-2009?c=455:584" title="Daily Show on New York Times 'Aged News' on Hulu"&gt;Daily Show pointed out online news is faster&lt;/a&gt; than print. This is part of what makes people prefer online news, and by extension, makes advertisers shift their focus and spend from print to online.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;object width="512" height="296"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/KW_bPGFXO47ICaqCoC-JUg/455/584"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/KW_bPGFXO47ICaqCoC-JUg/455/584" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="410" height="237"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-6887127953456478249?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/6887127953456478249/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/printed-newspapers-are-yesterdays-news.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6887127953456478249'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/6887127953456478249'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/printed-newspapers-are-yesterdays-news.php' title='Printed Newspapers Are Yesterday&apos;s News'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-3119275791154006415</id><published>2009-06-06T22:32:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-06T22:44:30.419-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><title type='text'>Market Value of Content Hard to Assess</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;There are new untried ways to make money with moving pictures with synchronized sound, and lots of other ways it's currently being done, but I think who pays for the means of distribution and how is interesting and worth noticing. Substitute &amp;quot;moving pictures with synchronized sound&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;journalism&amp;quot; in this quote and interesting ideas form.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Dan Conover"&gt;So long as our information economy treats journalism as overhead, valuable only as advertising-bait, then our economy will be glutted with free, low-value journalism. We won't be able to study specific indications of value - in terms of price or quality - so long as it's produced as a subsidized commodity. The Web merely revealed that truth&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://xark.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/03/the-fire-that-frees-the-seed.html"&gt;The fire that frees the seed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Various forms of infrastructure are needed for video/film/&lt;abbr title="television"&gt;TV&lt;/abbr&gt; distribution, for example:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;physical DVDs and shipping&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;movie theatres and their films which can cost &gt;$30,000.00 per print&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;cables/wires/wireless systems that carry the internet to you&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;etc.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;The costs of the moving picture distribution infrastructure are covered directly and indirectly in different ways.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Movies in theatres can have the physical reels of film paid for by the distribution company which often affords to pay for the prints by getting a part of the box office receipts (charging the viewer directly). The final stages of distribution, like the projector and screen/speakers, are paid for by the exhibitors that get part of the box office but make most of their money through concessions (candy, popcorn, drinks).&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Broadcast television through the air has its first stages of distribution paid for in the early stages by the station (transmitter and licensing fees) which it sells ads to pay for. The final stage, as with online video, is a viewing device usually owned by the viewer.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Video uploaded online, say to YouTube, has its hosting and first stages of distribution paid for by a web site (an internet company) like Google, which often sells ads to make the money to afford do so. The final stages are covered by the telecommunication companies (which charge the viewer) and finally the display device which is usually owned by the viewer.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;On-Demand, be it iTunes-like or through a cable or satellite company, is paid for by charging the viewer directly.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is not a complete list. All of these models can change, with the last two changing most quickly today (internet ad supported and on-demand).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-3119275791154006415?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/3119275791154006415/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/market-value-of-content-hard-to-assess.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/3119275791154006415'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/3119275791154006415'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/market-value-of-content-hard-to-assess.php' title='Market Value of Content Hard to Assess'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-7944416452452670930</id><published>2009-06-06T21:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-06T21:54:25.684-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='advertising'/><title type='text'>Paid-Content for Newspapers Not a Solution</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Dan Conover"&gt;Quality journalism is expensive, and to the extent that it provides a public good, we will find ways to fund it. But top-heavy, poorly run, arrogant-to-the-bitter-end media companies? This is their crisis, not our crisis, and it certainly isn't about journalism.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Dan Conover"&gt;Newspapers that are turning to paywall plans today are gambling on a risky revenue stream that even the experts aren't predicting will provide a replacement to their lost advertising revenues (their &lt;strong&gt;biggest&lt;/strong&gt; financial problem is the rapid decline in advertising &lt;strong&gt;rates&lt;/strong&gt;, not the slow decline in print circulation). It's a &amp;quot;well, we've got to do SOMETHING&amp;quot; solution, not a logical, do-the-math solution.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Dan Conover"&gt;They don't get it. They don't &lt;strong&gt;want&lt;/strong&gt; to get it. And in many cases, they're &lt;strong&gt;literally paid not to get it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://xark.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/06/the-newspaper-suicide-pact.html"&gt;The newspaper suicide pact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-7944416452452670930?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/7944416452452670930/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/paid-content-for-newspapers-not-looking.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/7944416452452670930'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/7944416452452670930'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/06/paid-content-for-newspapers-not-looking.php' title='Paid-Content for Newspapers Not a Solution'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-8549442715192686165</id><published>2009-05-21T14:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-21T14:29:59.520-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='win'/><title type='text'>Google In Upfront Marketplace</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;Google is now buying and selling &lt;abbr title="television"&gt;TV&lt;/abbr&gt; ads in a big way.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Daisy Whitney"&gt;Google TV Ads has begun booking upfront deals with major agencies and advertisers for the first time.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Daisy Whitney"&gt;Marketers are committing upwards of seven figures to buy ads through the TV spot buying system in the year ahead, with agencies like Deutsch and Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi and advertisers like Coldwell Banker coming to the table, said Mike Steib, director of Google TV Ads.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Daisy Whitney"&gt;Steib explained that marketers can still buy or tweak their campaigns daily; they're simply agreeing to use Google TV Ads throughout the year.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Daisy Whitney"&gt;&lt;q cite="Mike Steib, director of Google TV Ads"&gt;What our customers told us if the planner can put us into the upfront plan, then the buyers are free to utilize the platform in the way they works best for them,&lt;/q&gt; he said.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote cite="Daisy Whitney"&gt;They can also buy ads on YouTube now using Google TV Ads&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ia00f4b58276bb2e32625f86587b44d2f"&gt;The Hollywood Reporter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-8549442715192686165?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/8549442715192686165/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/05/google-in-upfront-marketplace.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/8549442715192686165'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/8549442715192686165'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/05/google-in-upfront-marketplace.php' title='Google In Upfront Marketplace'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-4038381408111272847</id><published>2009-05-18T06:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-18T06:59:55.150-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><title type='text'>Legal Terms of Video Hosting Services</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Markus"&gt;...I was researching a video hosting service that would match my requirements of:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Which rights of my work I would have to give away,&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;what usage rights I could assign to my viewers,&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;what level of privacy I could expect in terms of disclosure of my data,&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;and where a service had its legal residence in case of a dispute.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; I’ve decided to collect and extend my findings in &lt;a href="http://advancingusability.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/owned-legal-terms-of-video-hosting-services-compared/"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; in the hope that it can help others in choosing their preferred video hosting service&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://advancingusability.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/owned-legal-terms-of-video-hosting-services-compared/"&gt;Owned? Legal terms of video hosting services compared&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;). Since these can change at any time, double check, and consider speaking with a lawyer; caveat producer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-4038381408111272847?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/4038381408111272847/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/05/legal-terms-of-video-hosting-services.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4038381408111272847'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/4038381408111272847'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/05/legal-terms-of-video-hosting-services.php' title='Legal Terms of Video Hosting Services'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4545002114540165097.post-2941934498723659904</id><published>2009-05-18T05:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-18T05:45:07.086-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='video'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='connecting'/><title type='text'>Numbers and the Net</title><content type='html'>&lt;blockquote cite="Sean Cubitt"&gt;But the great thing about the internet is that it allows every minor interest, every academic specialism, every rare and refined hobby a place, so the &lt;strong&gt;numbers really don't matter in the same way as the old media&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;(Emphasis added, from &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.strangelove.com/blog/2009/04/codecs-capability/"&gt;Codecs and Capability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4545002114540165097-2941934498723659904?l=details.viciousconcepts.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/feeds/2941934498723659904/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/05/numbers-and-net.php#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/2941934498723659904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4545002114540165097/posts/default/2941934498723659904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://details.viciousconcepts.com/2009/05/numbers-and-net.php' title='Numbers and the Net'/><author><name>David August</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07480909904812545827'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry></feed>