tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-41748285690399415162009-07-10T16:30:42.936-04:00UFO Disclosure Countdown ClockIn 1947 the US government announced that it had found a UFO wreckage. One day later, the story was retracted. Sixty years later the citizens wait for the government once again to come forward with some answers. This website will track how that information is forthcoming.m4evernoreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-14986410311099041542009-07-08T12:15:00.003-04:002009-07-08T12:32:38.986-04:00The Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - The Official July Time Is 6:00 A.M.<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - the current time for July 2009 remains at 6:00 A.M. - as it was in June. Indeed, other than multitudes of reports of Ufo's in June and early July - nothing noteworthy happened on the official Ufo Disclosure front.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>In fact, if anything - the opposite has happened - for, if you remember - one person in the Disclosure movement predicted that if the U.S. government didn't release disclosure information by May 31st that France would be doing so. As you know, France did nothing of the sort -- the predicting person didn't understand why it didn't occur. However, IF France had `disclosed info' - you can bet it wouldn't go beyond what other countries have done -- released data on Ufo's without ever saying `yes' Earth is visited by Aliens.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Additionally, since late June a particular `crop circle' has been `evolving' (something I haven't heard of before) and was interpreted as `predicting' a solar flare for July 7th - yesterday. Again, it didn't happen and believers in the intelligence above Earth were once again - disappointed. Seems the UFO field is lacking in psychics.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Should I even mention that Prophet Yahweh once again predicted and waited for his black giants in the spaceships to pose over him in Las Vegas? Nah.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Finally, here's an excellent Ufo video that seems to show an object - the ufo - releasing `orbs' -- well worth the look:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/H8bptMpkkjc&hl=en&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/H8bptMpkkjc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-1498641031109904154?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-1487813267049641302009-06-19T09:39:00.003-04:002009-07-01T11:16:47.921-04:00U.S. `Ufo' Disclosure - Could It Be Done With Limited Impact?<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the UFO Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - thanks for visiting today. And, today's post - as you can tell from the title above - is whether the U.S. Government has a unique opportunity to pulloff a `UFO disclosure' - similar to what has been done by several nations already.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, indeed, if you haven't been following the news closely, what has `been done' is simply `releasing files' about `UFO reports'. All of these `releases' have basically told the same tales over and over - regardless of country - and - all being similar to <em>what anyone with an interest in UFO's can read on a daily basis on the internet.</em> Indeed, on my other blog called The Heavy Stuff - I recently did a two part look at an old-time RAND report from 1969 about UFO's and `what to do about them' (Link at bottom of page.) - and - all I can say - is that only some aspects (and only by a matter of degree - but, this may be important too) of the UFO phenomena have changed over the last 60 years.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Indeed, the `reports' released by these countries have so much in common with what is available on the internet that almost NO surprises are found. The `reports' are rapidly becoming - non-news. After all, what the media is WAITING for is for ONE of the countries to say -- with NO reservation - THAT EARTH is being visited by non-humans from other parts of the universe - who use a `craft' to get to Earth.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, guess what? NO country does THAT when they release these `documents' -even if the analysis - written with the report - is that the `event' suggests `alien involvement'. After all, `analysis' is nothing more than an opinion -- and opinions are like ___holes - everyone has one. And, `subjective' observations - of aliens outside of crafts - can be treated like ANY `eyewitness testimony' - meaning - open to interpretation. Multiple witnesses can be `explained' as mass hallucination or whatever explanation offered by others including holograms or dimensional time or other high strangeness offerings - including Fortean events that have no `cause'.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, ultimately, the Government can `say' - here's the data. You are welcome to study it. Whatever the data represents - it is a rare occurrence. Some of the events are so strange as to suggest causes with physics that humans do not understand. No final determination can be made as to the overall phenomena - make up your own mind.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I can even imagine President Obama taking the time for some softball questions by our ever so investigative media -- `what do you think sir' - to which our President will say something like this "well, I've read the report and it does have some interesting testimony and many strange, almost surreal, occurrences - of which I don't know what to make of" "parts of it - do have a security aspect and our military has had an interest in such reports -- but -- I have 100% knowledge that we can defend our airspace - there is NO reason for concern and never, evidently, has been" "And, while a very very limited number of reports over the decades - seem to suggest entities not of human origin - I will leave it to others and the American people what to ultimately believe - because as you know, the mind can play strange tricks" "And, after reviewing this data and talking with our military - I can assure you we are not under any threat. That said, I have instructed MR. _________ to form a taskforce - to review any threats of unknown origin and to yearly provide a look from a security angle about phenomena"</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, that will be that. We could have `Disclosure' -- with NO admission of aliens. Indeed, if and when such an event happens - WE SHOULD EXPECT THAT POSITIONING BY THE GOVERNMENT. But, expecting politicians to take on a controversial issue that really gives NO upside - is expecting way too much of our near worthless politicians. But, EVEN if they WERE FORCED - if disclosure was done in the manner above - it could be done with limited impact and indeed - could be LESS than a one week story in the `big serious' media. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>(OK, I must admit - I've written a post before about REAL UFO Disclosure - meaning - UFO Crafts Sitting In The Skies Over Populated Areas On Purpose --- in that scenario I suggested that in as little as Two Weeks - the media could move it past the number one story - depending on how long the UFO's stayed over the cities and what happened next. That link on the bottom too.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Give me your thoughts.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=68">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=68</a> --- my Heavy Stuff post about Aliens Disclosing by sitting in the skies with crafts and how the story could be over in two weeks.</strong><br /><a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=109">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=109</a> Part one of the RAND study.<br />Have you read my political blog yet? <a href="http://realheavypolitics.blogspot.com/">http://realheavypolitics.blogspot.com/</a><br /><strong>I am known as the AnomalyMan on Squidoo - here is my archive - <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyManArchive">http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyManArchive</a> thanks for checking it out.</strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-148781326704964130?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-36322445189870102172009-06-10T10:52:00.006-04:002009-06-10T19:11:35.798-04:00Is `UFO Disclosure' Already Getting Boring?<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) on Blogspot - thanks for visiting. Well, as you may be aware, another country has joined the so-called `Ufo Disclosure' by releasing their research into the ufo events over the last twenty years or so - this one being Uruguay <a href="http://inexplicata.blogspot.com/2009/06/uruguay-air-force-declassifies-ufo.html">http://inexplicata.blogspot.com/2009/06/uruguay-air-force-declassifies-ufo.html</a>. And, once again, the `reports' include every range of the reported phenomena associated with Ufo experiences - including soil transformations at landing sites, missing time experiences, cattle mutilations, pictures of orbs following aircraft, etc.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, once again, released in a manner that DID NOT include the President of the country going "there are aliens on Earth" - indeed, what is released is `information' and analysis - not confirmation. You need to know this difference and understand it from the perspective of governments. Indeed, as I said in my blog The Heavy Stuff on a recent post about this same subject:</strong><br /><br />"It doesn’t even matter if the material within such `disclosure’ even has direct mention of `alien beings’ - really - as the `accounts’ amount really to a `subjective view’ of an eyewitness (and this is the level of belief the media gives it). Nowhere do we find the beyond a doubt objective proof - the beyond a doubt clear photograph or film evidence - or left behind calendar from another planet (or any artifact) — having to be `satisfied’ with the golly shucks `now what could that be’ - as the level of `concern-or-seriousness’ given to the experiences. No dead alien bodies, and no crashed spaceships." - The Heavy Stuff 5/8/09<br /><br /><a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=111">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=111</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>And, now, the latest buzz is that more countries, maybe even our own - will be `disclosing Ufo Info' soon - perhaps very soon. This link says it's a `minute to midnight' disclosure time <a href="http://www.allnewsweb.com/page6916913.php">http://www.allnewsweb.com/page6916913.php</a> - which is certainly of interest to my readers -right? </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>To which I say, oh really? Because `disclosure' without `confirmation' is really lame - at best. But, I have to admit, it would be an intermediary step; the kind that politicians seem to like to take when venturing into uncharted waters. </strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Indeed, what the internet buzz being thrown about now is saying - <em>is that `governments' really don't know all that much about the ufo phenomena</em> - except to say that some external entities, outside of humans, seems to use crafts to get to Earth; some of which have crashed and have been recovered, and that the crafts might monitor us. (And again, no mention of `beings' - it seems the crafts are not manned.)</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I must say, if this latest `buzz' by the exo-politics folks is correct --> it would make for an interesting `positioning' by our government or any government. No longer would orb lights in the sky need to be denied. No longer would `crafts' need to be denied. And, since we would have admitted to crashed crafts - we could easily reveal that `governments' have reversed engineered a few such vehicles. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Therefore, some `UFO's' are indeed US. And, then, they could indeed `show' the sheeple (us) what they look like and how they perform (they could say that our saucers are not faster than light - and that we are still digesting all the science of anti-gravity).</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong><em>And, the only thing that would be denied is `alien contact'</em> - putting 100% of the mystery into a `science setting' of how to get a craft from one part of the universe to another part. And, with THAT - lo and behold - until some alien civilization took it upon themselves to intervene on Earth, or some country trotted out a live alien --- the UFO question would be muted and the issue OVER.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>After all, even with the internet - even with perhaps 1,000's of Orb videos and perhaps 1,000's of `ufo craft' videos --- to THIS DAY -- NO ONE HAS EVER PRODUCED AN INDISPUTABLE `ALIEN' ON TAPE/VIDEO. EVER. (Yes, I have seen that video of that one supposedly on Area 51 - this could be the exception and even if real - <em>shows the near non-existence of such tapes and beings</em>.)</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, that, says something. <em>Perhaps, nearly every craft visiting Earth does NOT have a manned biological entity</em>. It would be an interesting idea to let seep into the collective human consciousness - <em>via advanced science mankind too can visit other worlds</em>. Indeed, what if we could send `unmanned' crafts - faster than light - to distant worlds and broadcast that back to us - or - return the craft and see what was recorded. The whole idea would be exciting and non-threatening.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>That indeed would be mindblowing - and - it would be mindblowing knowing that someone was watching Earth in possibly the same manner.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, without an alien body - any `images' or `temporal entities' seen near the Ufo's <em>could really be claimed to be projections of the crafts software or holograms of some sort.</em> The same could be claimed even for abductions out of ones bed or cattle mutilations.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Indeed, if there ISN'T some `take me to your leader' video - or live on-earth entity --- IF we, mankind, <em>really are still alone physically </em>- in this part of the universe - the ufo disclosure so long awaited - might just point in that direction after all.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And THAT would be a be surprise to almost everyone. Stay tuned.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><br />Many more ufo links at my archive site <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/anomalymanarchive">www.squidoo.com/anomalymanarchive</a> .<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-3632244518987010217?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-87893272313719806612009-06-02T14:16:00.004-04:002009-06-04T09:23:17.236-04:00Huffing And Puffing Doesn't Bring Alien Disclosure - The Current June Time Is 6:00 A.M.<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) and as you can see - the current time is 6 AM - same as last month.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>About the only real `movement' concerning Ufo Disclosure last month was the `Disclosure' movement turning up the heat on the new administration. You see, sometime in March or April - the Disclosure folks gave the executive branch `until' May 31st to fess up ------------ OR --- they would force the governments hand to do so. </strong><strong>I assume this forcing was to be done by having so many `insiders' go public that the truth would be undeniable. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>One problem, even IF more insiders came forward - unless it was someone like Mr. Neil Armstrong - (first man on the moon) AND John Glenn - together -- it doesn't matter. Why? Because we've already had a man who was on the moon do the same and the big media just brushes it off like a ugly flea who needs to be silenced. After all, when Edgar Mitchell raised the stink again last year - the probing media got one staffer at NASA to say `we aren't in the cover-up business' and THAT WAS THAT. End of `story'.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, it was NO surprise that no one budged in the administration. Indeed, the May 31st deadline came and went with NO mention by the mainstream media - heck - the internet community didn't even seem moved. So, indeed, why move the Disclosure Clock - we remain in the twilight of dawn - will it ever be afternoon even?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Here's my daily anomaly site on squidoo if you need more <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan">http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan</a></strong><br /><br /><strong>Here's a recent Ufo Video Of Interest.</strong><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0G-PIjBJFuk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0G-PIjBJFuk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-8789327231371980661?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-70587931672468038702009-05-19T11:02:00.004-04:002009-05-19T12:33:00.261-04:00Hey Look Us Over, Lend Us An Ear ......<strong>Hello and welcome back to the UFO Disclosure Countdown Clock - thanks for hitting the link or for clicking your bookmark of this website (stats indicate a fair percentage of readers (32%) are repeat visitors - or - regulars as they are called). And, indeed, today as in a previous post - I turn to some `statistics' readily available for free that you too can check out on this website. If you go to this link - <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/states#geo">http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/states#geo</a></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>you can see a representation of what cities, in particular, have a high incidence or a low incidence of visiting this website. Indeed, here below are the five cities in the world with the most unique cookies to this website:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/cities?sortby=name&sortorder=desc">Cities</a><br /><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/cities?sortby=reach&sortorder=asc">Uniques (Cookies)</a><br /><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/cities?sortby=reach-pct&sortorder=desc">Uniques %</a><br /><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/cities?sortby=reach-idx&sortorder=desc">Uniques Index</a><br /><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/cities?sortby=visits-pct&sortorder=desc">Visits %</a><br /><a href="http://www.quantcast.com/ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/geo/cities?sortby=visits-idx&sortorder=desc">Visits Index</a><br />Unknown<br />49<br />3.98<br />61<br />8.00<br />113<br />London (GB)<br />22<br />1.79<br />121<br />1.74<br />149<br />Chicago, IL (US)<br />16<br />1.30<br />157<br />1.18<br />112<br /><strong>Alexandria, VA (US)<br />16<br />1.30<br />1,101<br />1.11<br />678</strong><br />Toronto (CA)<br />15<br />1.22<br />146<br />1.11<br />142<br />Sydney (AU)<br />10<br />0.81<br />168<br />0.77<br />186<br /><br /><strong>This chart is easier to read if you go to the link - but even layed out vertically by this word processing - it is very revealing. Note which ONE city in the world has an `index' of coming to this webpage 11X compared to that cities population and has an index of visiting 6.78 X's the normal population - Alexandria, Virginia. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>One of the powercenters of modern times. Which Wikipedia says "One of Alexandria's largest employers is the U.S. <a title="United States Department of Defense" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Defense">Department of Defense</a>. Others include the <a title="Institute for Defense Analyses" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Defense_Analyses">Institute for Defense Analyses</a> and the <a title="Center for Naval Analyses" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Naval_Analyses">Center for Naval Analyses</a>." Isn't that interesting?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Certainly, if UFO disclosure was NOT an issue - or - if UFO disclosure wasn't a fictional thing based on pure nonsense - there would be little reason to have such a skewing of information. Right? So, one must assume that there is a monitoring of websites such as this one to gauge public sentiment on this issue. (Perhaps it is the clear analysis on the disclosure issue?)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Whatever the reason - welcome Alexandria! Thanks for looking us over - now - could you lend us an ear?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Comments are welcome too - I also have more UFO links and other weird stuff at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan">www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan</a> - thanks for visiting today.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>UPDATE - Within minutes, literally, of this post - this visitor:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><br />(Army Information Systems Command-Pentagon)<br />ISP<br /><br />Army Information Systems Command-Pentagon<br />Location<br /><br />Continent<br /> :<br />North America<br />Country<br /> :<br /><a href="http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s44m4ever&v=78&country=US&vlr=11&pg=1&r=76">United States</a> <a href="http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s44m4ever&v=78&country=US&vlr=11&pg=1&r=77"></a> <a href="http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s44m4ever&v=78&country=US&vlr=11&pg=1&r=78">(Facts)</a><br />State<br /><br />Today's visit at 12:14 <a href="http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s44m4ever&r=11">http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s44m4ever&r=11</a><br /> :<br />Virginia<br />City<br /> :<br />Vienna<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-7058793167246803870?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-60101277194879864492009-05-12T14:14:00.008-04:002009-07-01T11:18:37.650-04:00If `Solar Warden' Is True - What ELSE Is `Out There'?<strong>Hello, welcome to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - thanks for visiting and being an open-minded person. Indeed, you will have to be a very very very open-minded individual for the following link - <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolulu-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2009m5d6-NASA-decline-related-to-antigravity-space-fleet">http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolulu-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2009m5d6-NASA-decline-related-to-antigravity-space-fleet</a>. </strong><br /><br /><strong>As you can see by the link title itself - the link concerns NASA's supposed decline in the current era of our anti-gravity space fleet - code named Solar Warden - which - supposedly - is already a minimum of 45 years old . Perhaps older. You see, supposedly, (if you read the link- and links from that link) the USA has had a colony on MARS since the 1960's - yes, you read that right -- oh, I forgot to say - the colony on Mars is in cahoots with the Russians.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>You can't make this stuff up. (?)</strong><br /><br /><strong>You see, supposedly, we've had these anti-gravity crafts from reverse engineering of `alien' crafts that crashed. That reverse engineering, of course, is funded off the official government budget - and lets NASA be a cover for the common folk like you and me. And, not only that, but if all was to be believed - we not only have interplanetary capabilities - we have interstellar capabilities. Oh, I forgot to tell you - we have about 8 motherships and about a few dozen smaller anti-gravity crafts. Are you still with me?</strong><br /><br /><strong>Oh, and YES, there are alien races within the Earth's zone of influence.</strong><br /><br /><strong>And, NO, this fantastic story is yet to be sullied by any mention of Lizard Type aliens. Yet.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Now, as fantastic as this story is -- and it is fantastic - could it be credible? Indeed, what IF our government found an alien craft? If so, certainly, you can't tell me that they wouldn't try to back-engineer it - right? I mean - as a citizen - I'd be MAD if they DIDN'T try to do that. So, the first 3 IF's - a crashed craft, held by the government, and back engineered - is within the realm of possibility - for sure. AND, nearly likely IMO.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Next, the idea that NASA's decline is also tied to all of this by the linked story. Is that plausible or credible? IMO, it is certainly plausible. But, the best hoaxes and storytellers are plausible too. The `Truth' has strange company. <em>But, just imagine if this is the truth!</em></strong><br /><br /><strong>Then, the moon missions were a sham (even if they occurred as promoted). Every planetary mission and launch - a sham. Skylab - a sham. The Space Telescope Hubble - a probable sham. The entire NASA budget - a sham. <em>The entire government budget - a sham. Every government official who knew of all this - a sham. Truthfulness from the government - a sham.</em> The deaths in the `official' space program - needless.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I mean, if true, how much has all this cost? What benefits has it brought? What else is off-budget? Are we `safe' from the Aliens because of it?</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, if the link provided above is TRUE - the government - one day - will have the mother of all mothers of a scandal on their hands. And, it will take more than a package of Sham-Wow's to clean this mess up.</strong><br /><br /><strong>What do you think? </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>More Aliens Stuff here at my main blog -- <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?cat=76">http://theheavystuff.com/?cat=76</a></strong><br /><br /><strong>I'm known as the AnomalyMan on Squidoo - here is my Archive of great links - </strong><br /><a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyManArchive">http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyManArchive</a> <strong>Thanks for checking it out too.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-6010127719487986449?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-7628837827908605562009-05-06T07:28:00.006-04:002009-05-06T08:22:41.291-04:00The Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock Setting - Current Time For May 2009 Is 6:00 A.M.<a name="10609978014890676"></a><br /><strong>Hello, and welcome to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - this months time is now 6:00 A.M. -- moving `forward' from a 4:20 AM `high time for disclosure' setting of last month. I've used the idea of `dawn' before to describe the `placement' of where the government seems to be on the Ufo Disclosure issue. It still fits today. The issue certainly doesn't seem `late in the evening or even late in the day' if one looks at it realistically. Then again, others would stress we are no longer on the dawn.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>After all - the sightings continue unabated - with a very visual one in Atlanta last month that looked like a ribbon of lights - much like the Stephenville video stills showed sky symbols. These ribbon ufo's seem to be gaining in `showing' - and again, bring into question just what is going on in our skies.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Indeed, those who say disclosure is well beyond the dawn might point to two `developments' again last month. The first one was the `once again' 15 seconds of big media attention to Edgar Mitchell's statements about aliens and the Roswell crash in 1947. The brush off this time was even quicker for Mitchell compared the last `Mitchell Flap' in July of 2008 (yes it was that recent). At that time, I moved the Countdown Clock to it's most `forward' position of 9:00 AM --- now, the repeat effect has even less influence. (At least until Mitchell is joined by many many astronauts.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, the Mitchell Flap was only one `development' -- the other `development' was once again -- another of the Disclosure groups claimed that if the government didn't come forward with info by May 31st that they would force the governments hand with lots of insiders coming forward. Oh please. I guess after `playing nice' that someone has some backbone perhaps - but - it really doesn't matter. What matters is that the big media will basically IGNORE whatever, or whoever, is brought forward. (Remember the push for a million Faxes sent to Washington DC on this issue.) This seems to be a hard fact that `those that hope for ufo disclosure' from President Obama have in accepting.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, there was some movement in the clock - and those that hope for a spring thaw or something happening in the heat of the summer - can perhaps have some hope that the clock will move from the dawn into a different position on the dial. Perhaps in just a few weeks, May 31st -- proof will be presented. Just like last Oct. 14th was going to be the date. But, as someone famous once said - this too will pass.</strong><br /><br />Finally, I cover UFO daily at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan">www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan</a><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-762883782790860556?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-61440705813344948842009-04-29T13:09:00.006-04:002009-04-29T19:21:38.111-04:00My Response To Joe Capp's `Ufo's What Are They Seeing?'<strong>A few days ago I posted here in the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC), and yesterday, the post was picked up by the editor of The Anomalist.com and coupled with a post from the blog of Joe Capp. Both of our posts asked our readers to consider certain things and viewpoints about the ufo issue - like all blogs do. I asked my readers to consider that the `actual' demand for Ufo Disclosure by the public in America is not that significant in real numbers; and, Mr. Capp asked his readers to consider the considerable evidence about the alien phenomena here on Earth. And, as you can tell from the title on my post today - I will be responding to Joe.</strong><br /><br /><br /><strong>Just a bit of background. Both Joe and I have seen at least one `UFO' -- I describe my experience here <a href="http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/07/my-ufo-experience.html">http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/07/my-ufo-experience.html</a>. If you read this post linked I describe all aspects of having an Ufo experience - and indeed - it's not as simple as is generally thought of. Joe Capp is an especially good describer of the effects that result from seeing an indisputable `Ufo'.</strong><br /><br /><br /><strong>So, back to Mr. Capp's post. The first thing Joe does is point at a 1964 case with a rock solid witness who at close range saw not only a ufo but 3 aliens outside of the landed craft. The case included physical evidence witnessed by others. Joe then goes on to say these `small' beings have been seen all over the world too and usually associated with ufo's.</strong><br /><br /><br /><strong>My response to Joe in this first instance - the one that really matters (because we are talking about real on the ground aliens) is this; - <em>numbers m</em>atter. And, while I do not dispute the nature of existing claims of aliens being seen on the ground - <em>the occurrence is very very very rare</em>. So rare that one conclusion could be that very very few aliens are actually `around' Earth (or almost never need to get out of their craft in the presence of humans). Indeed, some questions that need to be asked might be `do the `aliens' need some sort of level of population for breeding purposes?' or `are we to assume that alien `breeding' takes place on `their home' planet (or base near or on Earth) and that they only visit Earth?'</strong><br /><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, to this speculative end -- <em>except in the `underground aliens in the southwest USA stories'</em> - `normal folks' <em>never seem to report `large numbers' of aliens</em>. Stories from `Abductees' generally indicate that they only see a limited number of beings - not large numbers. (No one reports going onto a space craft and seeing <em>hordes</em> ready to populate the Earth.) So, that brings me to speculate that - the beings that are being seen are either <em>beings that travel in crafts beyond the speed of light and therefore can go back to their `planet' for replenishment - or - are the `limited exploration crew' sent from planets into the universe</em>. These would be planets like ours that have developed the means to travel below the speed of light and are civilized enough to invest in `explorers' of the universe (the `beings' and the `craft' being a bragging representation to other worlds that `we got to you before you got to us'). </strong><br /><br /><strong>But, the latter would need to be a very magnanimous society to fund such an esoteric idea with no promise of return on investment. Or, perhaps, those in such a position are `the select' sent into space when a home planet citizens are doomed by planet ending events. But, my main point is this --- `we' don't need to be concerned that 1,000's - literally - 1,000's of unidentified `objects' are seen in the skies each year (as there might indeed be other explanations than `alien craft') - or - that `1,000's' of UFO's are in the skies (but, due to cloaking - that may be possible) - what we need to be concerned with are probably `a limited number' of actual `alien' craft - of which - only a % is `manned' in all probability. To me, it's much more likely that the monitoring of Earth - if done by an alien craft - is as likely - if not moreso - to NOT have a crew - or - might have a `crew' that is less than biological. </strong><br /><br /><strong>After all, a civilization with the knowledge and stability to send a craft to Earth is likely to have robotics we can't even imagine in the era we live in today. So, as little as I enjoy saying it -- even `seen aliens' -- may not really be what we consider `real life beings'. But, really - all that is immaterial - what matters is that `some' `aliens' seem to have been seen and be beyond any reasonable explanation. I accept that a few are around - but - only a few. (This does NOT rule out MORE than one alien race being visitors of Earth - indeed - logic would suggest more than one <em>if there are any</em>.)</strong><br /><br /><strong>Mr. Capp then provides his `second' challenge to skeptics about Ufo's by citing what is now a well known case of an UFO interfering with a nuke missile system in 1967 (and to Joe's point - there exists a video of a Ufo shooting down a missile in the air). And, with this point by Joe - he hits the nail on the head. Ufo's are a national defense issue at some level - and were treated as such in the early days of the first Ufo wave in the late 40's and early 50's. Indeed, in posts I've made before I've stressed this national security aspect - especially in instances like this or such as the O'Hare Ufo Incident. And, since big media is `made' to treat the subject as entertainment - and not as a `concern' -- we are unlikely to visit this issue anytime soon. Indeed, this could be the very reason that UFO disclosure is NOT coming anytime soon.</strong><br /><br /><strong>So, Joe, I accept that a few Ufo's have displayed `their power' in ways that `show mankind' of their `power' and abilities. I think our government knows it too. To know that ones species is not as advanced as others - when we've assumed we were `it' for thousands of years - is a little disconcerting. It makes humans appear `weak'. It is not one of the nice cuddly aspects of the ufo phenomena. (Come to think of it - are there any?) I also assume that the `security' side of the phenomena - is the reason for much of the mis-direction and mis-information being fed into the ufo community over the years (decades).</strong><br /><br /><strong>However, I think one thing is also true --- and this is just my opinion - and, that is - in the 1950's the governments of the world <em>did indeed decide that the phenomena was not of `immediate concern' to overall security</em>. And, over the ensuing decades, the governments have become even more convinced that <em>the aliens are not going to invade or dramatically intervene in our human matters</em> here. That said, I think the phenomena of ufo's - probably conduct a limited amount of `abductions' (during of which there may be brainwashing) - probably conduct a limited number of cattle mutilations for a reason unknown to us - and occasionally`display' themselves - to demonstrate some value or meaning to humans. (Crop circles and such.)</strong><br /><br /><strong>No, I do not think any of the above are black-ops of the standard government structure - that said, who knows what `structure' lies outside of the `standard' government idea. <em>Folks would be naive to think that the billions that `disappear' in certain budgets or the huge underworld of dollars (funded by illegal things) - don't make it to certain `underground' government activities.</em> I think we all have also speculated that<em> the need for secrecy may have evolved into some `world cartel' on this information and perhaps world projects in response</em>.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Continuing.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Then, Mr. Capp brings up the similar experiences of different `bedroom abductees' - and suggests that they may be ET's - or - any of the other suggestions made by critics of those suggesting alien abductions from the bedroom. ------------- My response is that IMO most of these experiences are an area of real phenomenology <em>but are indeed subjective to the one that experiences the event.</em> I also think the other offered `ideas' by Joe account for a significant % of the experiences and the the remainder are having the subjective experience that DMT users have had. In other words, a subjective brain phenomenology, in general.</strong><br /><br /><strong>All that said, do `a few' of these abductees - get abducted by real physical aliens - IMO - yes. But, a very very few - perhaps 100's or even 1,000's - but NOT millions - as the `common literature' pushed at the gullible says.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Joe then goes on to talk about the Ufo flap over Washington D.C. in 1952 - My response -- I would simply say that most of the `events' were real and that our governments `hand' was being `forced' or `called' in some sort of way. But, to me, this is nothing more than point two above - the national security issue. That said, your pointing out that the aliens KNEW to target D.C. -- would seem to be a mighty big co-incidence to skeptics. Or should be.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Joe then describes the above (that I refer to) missile being shot out of the sky and other hard evidence -- My Response -- It's rare evidence of a rare thing. Ufo's are not everywhere - but - they are out there.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Then, Mr. Capp writes this:</strong><br /><br /><strong>"</strong><em>We have got to start to put this together in our minds. We continue to write as if there were no detailed history of UFO cases from all over the world. We act as if within those reports don’t include a large body evidence by credible witnesses describing little creatures that don’t look human .If this is not technology then what is it? For decades we have been recording a presence all over the world with our modern instruments… and while we debate what that presence could be, IT has behaved awfully like a strategic intelligence conveying powerful, yet non-verbal, messages. I think many in the military have understood completely what those messages are: they are from a technological intelligence</em><strong>."</strong><br /><br /><strong>I believe Joe again - hits the nail on the head with this analysis.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Finally, Joe speaks about an amazing case that I bet most folks have never heard about -- it's one in which over 50 kids claimed to see aliens. I am also aware of this case and have a link to it on one of my Squidoo pages. It's an amazing story. I also believe that an Ufo phenomenology event occurred. But note -- <em>this is ONE example - and - is a rare, rare, one of a kind event.</em> Of which who knows the motives of the intelligence being displayed to these kids. You see, I believe that at least part and perhaps a significant amount of UFO activity --- could be different types of entities than `aliens' dependent on technology to `get to Earth'. Indeed, I believe in `entities' easily as much as `aliens'.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>Joe also goes on to make the great points about black-ops too;such as how not one person has ever come forward about these black-op's or been outed by investigation. His words:</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>"</strong><em>Over and over again, we hear intelligent people say these experiences are not ET related. Are they saying that we have a clandestine, well-trained military squad of very small people piloting these black projects? Does that make sense?Vertically challenged people riding and piloting these above top secret objects…even to this day? It is funny we never had one of these small people come forward…none of them have integrity?This is, to me, a filtering of the reported cases to fit an agenda."</em><br /><br /><em></em><br /><strong>Finally, Mr. Capp turns to question the very motives that ET's might have for doing what they seem to do:</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>"</strong><em>It may be many motives or different motives for different races. We can surmise they don’t want to be a public certainty but they do not want to be unknown. Are we saying as humans we can’t write any explainable intelligent motive behind that behavior? We know sometimes they appear in strange and confusing ways, seemingly not making sense. Just because something may appear not to make sense, doesn’t mean it can’t make sense.To say it is a “far cry” or a “real stretch” for any informed person to conclude that the predominant model to explain UFOs and their occupants is indeed Extra-Terrestrial is the real nonsense</em><strong>."</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>So, finally, let us examine Joe's final point - motive. What motive would a visiting intelligence - greater than mankind - have for NOT wanting public certainty, yet, WANTING to be known as existing? --------- Well, I'll bite. What if it's something similar to what some of the `ufo nuts' say? What if the `aliens' are a mix of `monitoring entities' that monitor life bearing planets that seemingly have some intelligent species? The `aliens' may indeed have a `have peace - not war' message to impart to abductees - knowing that life bearing planets with intelligence are NOT a dime a dozen. The `aliens' may indeed `interfere' with our NUKE missiles - that could be standard protocol for all we humans know. And, they may abduct our livestock for any number of reasons - including food or organs for themselves - or monitoring the quality of our food supply.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>BUT, perhaps, there is much more than UFO's in our skies - <em>perhaps some of the fortean things we see are much more esoteric in nature</em>. What if Tulpas are real for example? They could account for many many `sightings' of `lights in the sky'. And, the spirit of our human consciousnesses, could indeed by a part of a noosphere of intelligence - that could display on Earth in various ways perhaps - including crop circles. And, finally, the chance that some entities/real aliens MIGHT not need crafts and indeed travel above the speed of light and outside of the timecone of now - makes virtually ANY representation of that phenomena possible - these `things' probably are temporal characters with a fleeting existence in our reality. Indeed, like Joe's opening line - quoting Shakespeare - that there are more things in heaven and earth - is dead on.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>Catch Joe's blog here - <a href="http://ufomedia.blogspot.com/2009/04/ufoswhat-are-they-seeing.html">http://ufomedia.blogspot.com/2009/04/ufoswhat-are-they-seeing.html</a> - and, don't miss the comments below this post of Joe's.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>And, talk about not missing - don't miss my new Archive on Squidoo at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/anomalymanarchive">www.squidoo.com/anomalymanarchive</a> - thanks for reading today. I'd love your comments too - and - lastly - the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock gets re-set soon - so - bookmark and return.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-6144070581334494884?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-60326012758965872602009-04-27T11:23:00.002-04:002009-04-27T12:44:08.390-04:00The Actual Lack Of Thirst For Ufo Disclosure<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the UFO Disclosure Countdown Clock (internet rating services say about 28% of you are `regulars' - UDCC has no `addicts') or - for hitting the link or doing the search today. Don't get a welcome like that at most blog sites right? And, actually, I have a purpose - because today I'm going to talk `the numbers' about `UFO' disclosure.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Now, being in marketing research for decades has taught me one thing - folks always think that `other folks' share their interests in their `product/subject matter' at a far greater level than actually is the case. So, in our case - UFO disclosure - those `into it' - tend to think that `everyone wonders' like we do - and that `others' are desiring this possible information about UFO/ or Alien Disclosure.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And, with the big media spreading falsehoods like ` 14% of Americans have seen a UFO's (remember this represents over 40 million) - one would think that flocks of folks are constantly on websites that are talking about UFO's or alien disclosure. That flocks of folks are googling search terms about the subject: and, to that end I present that last 11 google and yahoo searches to this site:</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br />alien disclosure 31-5-2009<br />obama countdown for alien revelation<br />ufo disclosure time schedule<br />obama disclosure<br />inaugeration and ufo<br />united nations ufo disclosure<br />obama alien disclosure<br />"phoenix lights" gamma ray burst<br />obama and ufo disclosure<br />ufo disclosure countdown<br />obama inauguration rods<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Pretty typical keywords really -- for anyone into the subject. Obama mentioned in about half and the `timeliness' of disclosure being an overriding theme. Indeed, I'm sure this website is on the front page of Google and Yahoo for the above specific searches as most folks don't go digging down the pages. And, indeed, this website UDCC is #1 on page one of Google for such terms as `disclosure countdown' (#1-4 on page 1) and `ufo countdown'(#1-2 on page 1 out of 578K). And, while other huge websites are top searches for terms like `ufo disclosure' (UDCC-6th page) and `alien disclosure' (UDCC-2nd page) - we still do well.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>My point is this - if you are searching for information and blogs about ufo disclosure in today's world - you are likely to have my blog as a choice.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>Now, back to those searches I've listed above -- 11 searches in 11 hours - that came to this site via yahoo/google. And, as you know, my blog is not obscure. (That is not to say that last week during the renewed Edgar Mitchell stuff, and the supposed floating of May 31st as the disclosure date - that visitors didn't reach 50-80 per day.) (All of the recent visits are results of links as nothing new has been posted here since the 4th.) Most days the UDCC gets under 45 visits - unless I post - then `market' the post to similar websites that post `content' links. And, even when all websites who occasionally `go' with my post -- on UDCC - seldom do even 1,000 folks read the post on a given day or several thousand in a week.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, lets do a little extrapolation from that in a sense. Let's say that of all people over the age of 12 - that in a given week are `seriously interested' in the ufo disclosure issue - that 2% are able to find my site with the near perfect name. That doesn't seem too lofty does it? ----------- SOOOOOOOOOOOOO --- being very speculative but perhaps realistic too ---- multiply my websites `universe of folks' that have an interest and you have perhaps 100,000 folks at MOST who are `seriously' interested in this issue - in a BUSY week of ufo news on the big media. To the rest that are exposed - IT'S ENTERTAINMENT - at best. (Which is why it is treated with a smirk - instead of as - a national security issue.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Now, let me be REAL lenient in `exposing' this real interest -- lets say that of those that are indeed `seriously' interested in the alien disclosure and ufo issue - that of those folks; ones that wait for stories like this and search the internet for ufo links and stories: that on a `given week' -- only 50% become aware of a specific new `ufo issue' in the press. What this means is that you could double the actual number of `devotees' who `really care' about ufo disclosure -- so, 200,000 - perhaps.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, you counter argue, that sites like RENSE.com certainly have lots of traffic - and it does. But, it's not all ufo's or disclosure by any means -- and, would you be surprised if I told you that @ 2 out of every 10,000 internet users used Rense.com yesterday? <a href="http://alexa.com/siteinfo/Rense.com">http://alexa.com/siteinfo/Rense.com</a></strong><br /><br /><strong>The point of all this is to point out the obvious - their isn't a huge demand for the society groundbreaking event of alien disclosure on earth - especially when the precursors aren't in line. Precursors such as `finding life anywhere else' - like on Mars - or an asteroid - or from an intelligent signal in space. Once one of those have been established as a fact (and indeed - let soaked in) - then the foot dragging you see may lift off the ground.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Now, I don't doubt that if a quarter million folks showed up at the White House demanding Ufo disclosure that it wouldn't occur. But they won't (could they get even 1% for a 2,500 folk demonstration?). And the government won't - as it has NO incentive to do so - and the `timing' is wrong. (As it always is.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, I for one, will not be holding my breath about the latest date floated into the internet world about Alien Disclosure (May 31st, 2009) -- as it is nothing more than the last floated date (Oct. 14th, 2008) - this time supposedly with `folks that know behind it' --- whereas in October we only had Ms. Goodchild and the Federation of Light's word on it. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>LOL.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-6032601275896587260?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-106099780148906762009-04-04T21:21:00.003-04:002009-04-04T21:31:01.194-04:00O'Hare Hoax Leads To 4:20 Setting On Ufo Disclosure Countdown ClockThe new setting for the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock is 4:20 AM - A movement of 20 minutes from my last time setting as editor. (I say that because last months clock was set by popular opinion and the median worked out to a 2:15 PM setting.). The movement was triggered by the `hoax' of a British man seeking publicity - and - trying to use the media and internet as fodder for his hoax - finally admitting to the hoax - today April 4th. This after giving an `internet' interview that `hit' April 1st (yes, this is too funny).<br /><br />Now, it's not as if I haven't posted before about Ufo Fools Day <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=50">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=50</a> - as I did last March 30th. Indeed, just Thursday on my blog The Heavy Stuff <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/">http://theheavystuff.com/</a> - I posted my take on what `evidently' is now a combination of `hoaxing' 2 YouTube videos -- (both of these videos, evidently, were `shots' of a ufo magazine `article' about the O'Hare Ufo Incident - and then doctored to look like a `live' video) - and - the final `offered proof' - the `hoaxed' picture - supposedly taken inside a commercial jet out the window - submitted by non the less than an authoritative `captain'. Of course, no one was identified by name in ANY of this - `everyone' wanted to be anonymous and free of the Big Media. (This was done by one person.)<br /><br />And, actually, with a fortean twist still to be revealed at the end of this posting today; the hoax was marginally successful. Supposedly Fox News ran somewhat with the story at least marginally. The director of communications of one of the nations major Ufo organizations interviewed him and helped provide `information' - on Ufo Fools Day - and provided the final story all together including the `pilot picture' too - the day before the shouting of `April FOOLS'.<br /><br />And, indeed, the plotting was actually interesting (I've mentioned the plotting needed in The Georgia Bigfoot Hoax of last year on my blog THS too.) First, the `hoaxer' (note that I do not use the name of hoaxers - just as I do not use the name of lying former Governors of Arizona - nor - is there any need to embarrass those that provide information based on ufo cases of public interest) - did a good job in his timing. Plotting the release of the first YouTube video with time to build up momentum for the big day 4-1 (09) - giving the internet world - and early adaptors in the media time to respond. But, much more importantly, picking the perfect unsolved Ufo case. --------- One that already had peaked media interest - one that had already resulted in an official government comment (by the FAA) -- One already covered by the media acting in a `beyond hot' story manner when CNN originally interviewed the initial `observers' of the craft on Nov. 7th 2006 in silhouette.<br /><br />It was a story left unresolved - and lacking what many had mentioned should be in existence if the event occurred - cellphone captures. Indeed, there had long been rumored - near the time of the event in 2006 - that many folks had witnessed this event - even from parking decks and that more than once the rumor of videos came up --- never fulfilled -- but almost `expected'. And you know what expectations can do?<br /><br />So, playing on all that - the hoaxer made a go for it.<br /><br />Ultimately, I think the Mufon man probably tripped him up by insisting on `directions' he was facing --- and -- other tougher questions and answers. After all, it would be easy enough for someone to use the exact cellphone that he describes in a similar location to see if anything was remotely possible as `filmed'. And, indeed, some of the comments of the final interview were absurd - such as the claim that the ufo shot off at 30,000 MPH - and this man claims to see the motion? Or, that he was `100 meters' from the `700 foot high saucer'- that was 100 meters wide?<br /><br />I mean is he a bumbling fool (remember, I wrote my post on THS without reading the `interview' - just his previous declarations on YouTube - and before the `release' yesterday of the `picture') - to put or say the craft was going 30,000 MPH - that he observed in a `visible space' to the cloudbank level only hundreds of feet above the craft? His `mistakes' are glaring - and as usual with hoaxers - flimsier `evidence' than welldone Computer Graphic Fakes --- which are seldom hoaxed as they expect to be outed.<br /><br />So, should the Ufo community have given more restraint when a person refuses to go public and identify themselves - as the brave Stephenville Ufo witnesses did? Perhaps; but, remember, - NO witnesses have been `public' in this case - due to the potential national security implications. (My assumption.) Again, I want to stress that `silhouetting' was used by CNN on this case previously. So, again, in this ONE case - it may have been appropriate for the internet community to respond to this one - well laid folly.<br /><br />Should Fox have covered it - (assuming being true) - well - it's a no lose situation for Fox - if the `hoax' is `true' they `scoop' CNN --- and - if not - so what - they have made the Obama administration appear to `avoid' talking about it. But, if they had succeeded - they could claim the the administration is `distracted' about `flying saucers'. A no lose - win/win - situation.<br /><br />So, perhaps the protocol should be - anonymous postings on YouTube do not reach `internet discussion' of a serious level. No follow up interviews without identifying oneself.<br />Because, if you reach into your mind - not long ago - only a year ago the media - the big national media - for a day or two played up a `new' Phoenix Lights' report. Only to have it be a hoax done with simple flares - nothing like most folks experience originally in 1997. Indeed, the mis-information seemed deliberate - and I blogged about it a year ago this month here <a href="http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/04/this-weeks-ufo-hoax-too-convenient-to.html">http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/04/this-weeks-ufo-hoax-too-convenient-to.html</a> . I was the only blogger who took this stand.<br /><br />So, the media has been able to muddle - because of being so anxious (or having intentions to misdirect) - two of the most important `ufo events' in the last decade or so - (Stephenville the other biggie.) Now, BOTH associated with a hoax - both perpetuated by anonymous people - always men I will add. I guess we should all EXPECT a `super hoax' video for Stephenville next March?<br /><br />But, as I said in my post Thursday on THS - `does it matter'? With any evidence being potentially computer faked - nothing is `real proof'. It's clear now. The only video proof will come when a daytime sighting, at least relatively close, that has multiple `camera angles' shot with hundreds of folks and seen by thousands -- like at a NASCAR event. Or, a large public event like the Kentucky Derby (you get the idea). THEN, the concept of `public provided proof' - may finally be undeniable. But, the aliens have not chosen such a demonstration - ever.<br /><br />And, until politicians hands are forced like that - don't expect the time-setting on the official disclosure clock to budge much from the `high time' for disclosure setting. As, the man from Chicago - in Washington - has been heard to say "Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is - Does Anybody Really Care"? --- And, that seems to be the official line concerning Ufo's (and other things if you asked folks who wanted an answer to the internet question about cannabis).<br /><br />Just laugh off interests of those crazy internet folks (regardless if they got me elected).<br /><br />Indeed, does it really matter? (Makes me proud to say that I have never voted for a demo or repo for President since 1972.)<br /><br />Oh, yeah, I promised you the `Fortean Twist' in the `hoax' - and here it is.<br />I am in a somewhat unique position of maintaining a listing of anomalous links on Squidoo -- and I have pages and pages of links -- including a number of the OLD O'Hare links - from 2006-07-08. I was able to pull together prior OLD `leaked' photos which folks had submitted to various websites - purporting to be the very O'Hare Ufo. So, the interesting thing - the Fortean thing - most of the photos - IMO - fit the `fake' slightly blue sky, lower than expected Ufo elevation, and larger than 30 feet - information of the hoax ---------- than the `official' information of the `official reports'.<br /><br />So, the Fortean question remains to be asked - why would `prior' leakers - none of whom went public and also wanted to avoid the intense look at this particular case - have data that two years later is more in line with the first official hoax videos?<br /><br />Mr. Fort would love this.<br /><br />Don't miss those Fortean Links in my `new' Archive on Squidoo - <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyManArchive">www.squidoo.com/AnomalyManArchive</a> . Thanks for visiting - as always - I welcome your comments.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-10609978014890676?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-7308524929094809132009-03-24T09:47:00.003-04:002009-03-24T11:13:27.044-04:00An Analysis Of NUFORC'S Monthly Reporting Index<strong>Thanks for hitting the link and coming to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - and, today's post is about a vital link for anyone who considers themselves to have a real interest in the unexplained, unknown, or `ufo's' - and that - is this link to the National Ufo Reporting Center or NUFORC. Here's the `event' link <a href="http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/ndxevent.html">http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/ndxevent.html</a> which details the first person descriptions they have of `ufo' events on a month by month basis.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>For example, already for March 2009 there are over 152 reports to read - and there have been over 300 reports in 31 of the last 32 months - indeed, normal months in this era have over 10X's as many reports compared to all periods before 1994. TEN TIMES. Indeed, the first month that ever had more than 100 events was Feb.95 with 120. 200 events was broached Sept. 98 with 231 - 300 events was attained in Aug.99 with 306 events. 400 fell in Nov. 99 with 441 events (nervousness about Y2K?) -- then 500+ events first occured in Aug. 2003 with 531 events (534 is the highest ever in Aug. 2004).</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Other things of interest can be gleaned also from the extensive listing - such as - it was 6-66 before any month had 50 `events' -- and, of those 51 events, 28 involved seeing `disks' (their word for saucer shape) --- compare that to the latest month with complete data 2-09 ---> in which only 12 out of 356 `events' involved `disks' (in all fairness 23 were `ovals' and smaller number `circles'). Indeed, if one was to categorize the `<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">ufo</span> events' of Feb. 2009 -- one would have much different ideas about <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Ufo's</span> than `Flying Saucers'. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>For example - the most frequent description of an UFO was `light' - with @88 events out of 356 -- followed by `Triangle' with @36 - `Diamond' and `Rectangle' had 5 each too. Other descriptions included - sphere, teardrop, cross, cigar, and egg. Fireball was also a frequent description and more rarely `changing' descriptions and `formation' (often lights that arranged themselves).</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>It's also of interest that until 1989 -- nearly every year had JUNE as the month with the most <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Ufo</span> sightings. Indeed, it was only in the month of June that <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Ufo</span> reports exceeded 50 events until 7-76 --- indeed check this out, these are the only months with more than 50 events --- 6-68, 58 events; 6-72, 51 events; 6-74, 58 events; 6-75, 88 events; 6-76, 78 events; ---(June 82, the release month of ET had 58 tied for the 3rd most ever) and the pattern continued until 1995 -- then something happened - as most of the `most events months' have switched to August or later. <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">HMM</span>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Finally, I looked a little deeper at the four `events' that happened in Georgia in February 2009 to have a feel of what first person accounts read like:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/068/S68884.html">2/22/09 19:45</a><br />Tucker<br />GA --- While driving down La Vista Road, I looked out my window at the sky to see a very strange object. It was moving at about the speed of a helicopter, and it was shaped like a boomerang. It appeared to be moving sideways. It was pretty low to the ground, at about the height of an airplane about to land. There were lights running along the perimeter of it, from what I could see. I could only look at it for about ten seconds before it disappeared from my view.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/068/S68654.html">2/12/09 12:22</a><br /><span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Douglasville</span><br />GA ----- Around noon on Feb. 12, 2009, I noticed many <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">chemtrails</span> in the sky. I went to get my digital camera and started taking some photos of the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">chemtrails</span> as well as an airplane that flew nearby.After a few minutes, I noticed a small white dot in a slightly different area directly overhead where you could see blue sky. I took two pictures of the dot. At the time my only thought was that the dot seemed to be too high for an airplane. The airplane I saw and photographed a few minutes earlier was nowhere near the white dot.The dot made no sound, but it was moving slowly westward. It seemed like it sort of faded into view, then I spotted it and took two photos, and then it sort of faded away. My mom was with me at the time, but she assumed it could have been an airplane, but it seemed awfully high in the sky to her too.When I uploaded the photos to my computer, all I thought I had was a white dot in the sky. So I tried enlarging the image and it appears to be a structured object, vaguely cone-shaped, but it does not resemble any aircraft I have seen before.I sent the images to a friend of mine and he suggested contacting The UFO Center. All I can add is that one of the photos is better than the other, and I will upload the better photo to The UFO Center.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/068/S68599.html">2/11/09 22:30</a><br />Columbus<br />GA ---------- I was driving north in the middle of Columbus, GA on Wednesday, February 11, 2009 at 10:30 pm and then I saw what at first seemed to be a passenger airplane at low altitude and low speed traveling west. It passed over head and then it began changing shape at about a mile away. It had red lights that didn't blink in the middle of it and other lights where wings would be but in triangular distances from each other. As it changed shape, the red lights didn't move but the other light moved from their position from the sides to the direct top and bottom! Then it was very strange to look at for a number of seconds because it looked like an airplane flying on it's side at low speed and low altitude. Then, the lights began to turn off. I lost track of it as it passed away from me beyond the tree line. I traveled straight to the only airport in the area just in case it was a plane trying to make a hard turn back to the airport, but then there was no <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">airbourne</span> vehicle to be found heading to the airport or in the area for that matter.My cellphone began turning off by itself about a half an hour before until an hour after I saw this UFO. It was at half battery life and not low at all. I have never had this problem with my cellphone before this sighting or even since then.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/068/S68635.html">2/6/09 22:00</a><br />Powder Springs<br />GA ----------- I was in the car with my mom, I saw something in the sky. It was triangular in shape, and it had about 10 lights. The lights then disappeared!! Then, after about 3 minutes, they came <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9">bck</span> on, one by one!!! My mom it was just a plane , but I'm not going to take no for an answer. I know it was a UFO. The worst part was, I think I saw a light come Out of it!! I don't think I saw a human being sucked up, but I think it was an animal of some sort.(We were by a pet store). And there were planes going after it, too. That's all the info I have. I hope I could help.<br /><br /><br /><strong>How's that for four `random' reports? One sees an impossible craft in a crowded cityscape, one sees an `orb' (even though they didn't call it that) associated with contrails, one a changing triangle that affected a cellphone, and one thinking they saw an abduction -- we are well past the `flying saucer' seen at dusk. And, it certainly seems that a bigger phenomena is what is being described as <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10">Ufo's</span> - at least nowadays. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Thanks for reading - if you want more <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11">Ufo</span> stuff - please visit my blog at <a href="http://www.theheavystuff.com/">www.theheavystuff.com</a> - and look for the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12">Ufo</span> category. Finally, return next week for the new setting of the UFO Disclosure Clock.</strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-730852492909480913?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-29586229051168399042009-03-04T11:26:00.006-05:002009-03-06T17:45:29.735-05:00The People Have Spoken - This Months Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock's Current March Time Is 2:15 P.M.<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DFVCw_qOjE4/SbGmwoB4dsI/AAAAAAAAABA/dBgnmyDcbRE/s1600-h/clock-02-15_33009_md.gif"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5310208789955770050" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 320px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DFVCw_qOjE4/SbGmwoB4dsI/AAAAAAAAABA/dBgnmyDcbRE/s320/clock-02-15_33009_md.gif" border="0" /></a><br /><div><br /><br /><div><strong></strong></div><br /><br /><div><strong></strong></div><br /><br /><div><strong>Hello, and welcome to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - and - as you can see by the title of this posting - <em>The People Set Disclosure Time is 2:15 P.M.</em> That setting was determined by finding the approximate `median point' of the 42 voters in our reader survey from about Feb. 14- Feb. 28th - indeed, I want to thank those that participated. The poll results can be found near the top of the sidebar on the right side of this page.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Interesting findings from the small sample include:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /></div><br /><br /><ul><br /><br /><li><strong>21% believe the government in some manner has already given the disclosure</strong></li><br /><br /><li><strong>21% believe the government couldn't be further from official disclosure</strong></li><br /><br /><li><strong>Only 5 of the 42 participants voted 8:00 PM -11:59 PM</strong></li></ul><br /><br /><p><strong></strong></p><br /><br /><p><strong>One can only surmise what any vote meant as no comments were offered by participants in the poll - but, one could assume that those that think the government has disclosed `alien presence' - perhaps are thinking of the various `leaks' such as astronaut statements or the various Ufo specials on TV not being rebutted by official sources. Or, perhaps the general worldwide phenomena of more and more governments releasing `ufo files'.</strong></p><br /><br /><p><strong>Whereas, those who have the clock set at the earliest levels before dawn don't feel that they can point at even one smidgen of budge in the `official line'. These are the folks that take to heart the bold lies of the Stephenville Ufo Incident being 10 F-16's or that the O'Hare Ufo Incident --- didn't occur. Or, that other sightings are swamp gas or electrical sprites way up in the atmosphere. (The science explanation most recently trotted out by the obedient media.)</strong></p><br /><br /><p><strong>Finally, it's important to note that if only 5 of 42 folks voted in the timeframe closest to Midnight (an official disclosure) - that only about 11% of the population has the feeling that Government Ufo Disclosure is immanent - so - FEW would be expecting such an announcement (such an announcement would be shocking?) - and when few expect something from the government - it seldom happens.</strong></p><br /><br /><p><strong><em>The Peoples Time Setting will return in September</em> via another poll in August - next month - the setting will once again be set by my judgement. Please return again or keep reading down the page for more about Ufo Disclosure.</strong></p></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-2958622905116839904?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-27076606925571660662009-02-21T07:48:00.004-05:002009-03-01T09:44:09.741-05:00Obama's "it depends" Answer To The Alien Disclosure Question - Part Two<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) thanks for hitting the link or for visiting directly. (You can also become a follower of this blog as I now have the widget on the sidebar - please do if you like this website and the content that you find below.) As you can see - this post is about a video that we featured recently about President Obama's actual answer to the `alien disclosure' question posed by a press reporter during the campaign. (Yes, someone had the nerve to ask it.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Obama's exact words in answer to the question were "it depends on what these aliens were like" --- before his `joke' additional `answer' followed `and whether they were republicans or democrats'. You can see that video here to read his body language and hear the tone in his voice <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/anomalies#module15187462">http://www.squidoo.com/anomalies#module15187462</a> .</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, let's take the President, a politician, at his `word' - "it depends on what these aliens were like". --------------- Well, so far, in the UFO experiences folks have had we have: A Seen Technology we profess to not understand. Unwanted Abductions of people who say they are being used in some manner, even for reproduction. And, many `former insiders' who say much is being hidden from the American people.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Does THAT sound like something Obama wants to EXPLAIN?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I mean, exactly WHAT kind of aliens would be acceptable? Ones that are going to `enlighten us'? You have got to be delusional if you believe that.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The ones that would like to take over our planet (which would be simple if the humans were eliminated)? Yah right.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>The abductors and rapers of both sexes? Unlikely.</strong><br /><strong>The ones that have `magic' technology and can save us? ----- NO. They could as easily manipulate politicians or wipe us out.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Then perhaps Obama was talking about aliens who just want to be our friend - perhaps mine a little of Earth's resources? --------- Well since this is about as benign as `aliens' could possibly be (nevermind the implications to the religions of the world) --- perhaps he would disclose the alien situation if THAT was the situation. But, evidently, it's not - and is the very reason that NONE of those in real power have ever confirmed it while in power.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, can YOU think of a KIND of alien that Obama would disclose? And, if he did, please share with us all the advantages you think the government would get out of such a revelation? I await your comments - Oh, and you have a week left in the poll in the sidebar. Are you a follower of this blog?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Don't forget to see the video above - indeed, send it to a friend.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Or, do you like anagrams? Do you believe there is truth in anagrams? This click will take you to my post about the anagram truths for 2009 (Two-Thousand-Nine) <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/anomalies#module18229202">http://www.squidoo.com/anomalies#module18229202</a>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-2707660692557166066?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-65005809690508243222009-02-15T14:01:00.004-05:002009-02-15T14:30:10.777-05:00At What Time Would YOU Set The Ufo Disclosure Countdown `Clock'?<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC)- <em>I want to thank the 260 folks who voted over the last two weeks in our poll</em>. As you can read on the sidebar - the poll was gauging the opinion of this websites readers - as to whether they thought President Obama would disclose the `alien' aspect to Ufo's at any time during his first term - and, as you can see <em>75% said NO</em> - they didn't expect such an occurrence. </strong><strong>That finding is largely inline with an earlier poll on UDCC that suggested about 1/4 of all folks thought alien disclosure would be before 2012 - you can see that poll further down the sidebar. The finding is also not surprising considering the link we provided in our last post to Obama's 17 second answer to the alien disclosure `issue' - make sure to read down the page for that link. (Post dated Feb. 1st)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Now, as you can also see - I've added a NEW poll for you to vote in. This time the issue is `<em>what the time setting should be' on the UDCC</em>. If you think the government is far away (timewise) from fessing up -- select the first category of the wee hours of the morning. Likewise - if you feel that government disclosure on the issue is immanent - you certainly want to say the the time is ripe in the late evening. <em>Of course - any answer not at the extremes is fine also - as their are no right or wrong answers - only opinions.</em> If you wish - feel free to hit comments and support the time you think the clock should be set at. I will be listening to all of your comments and will respond to defend (to the best I can) my current setting.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Remember when you are voting in the poll that the clock setting ONLY refers to the government - our US government. Meaning, the `aliens' - the lights in the sky - the videos of - the media interest - ect. are all NOT to be considered when setting your estimate of the clock - just the government timing. (The aliens could suddenly sit over a NASCAR event for hours, be seen by 100,000 - videotaped by 10,000 - and be big news ---- yet the government clock could be at any setting prior to alien self-disclosure.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong> So, there is the latest post - please vote - you can also support this website by visiting The Ufo Store (see link) --- which has the internets largest variety of Ufo Products and even free, - yes free - downloads of various Ufo speakers <a href="http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever">http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever</a> - lots of fun stuff to look at too. Remember now to vote in the poll and to bookmark us - even better - leave a comment.</strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-6500580969050824322?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-7194568448243929532009-02-01T06:47:00.008-05:002009-02-14T17:55:53.745-05:00The Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - The Current February Time is 4 A.M.<strong>(Before you read any further - please vote in the poll on the top of my sidebar -- if you don't do it now - don't as you will be influenced by what you are about to read.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Have you voted?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Hello - thanks for coming to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - as you can see - the current setting for the clock has been moved `back' three hours towards midnight to 4:00 A.M. The reason for the dramatic move to the earliest time setting ever for the UDCC - is the video you will see below. You see, it seems that President Obama, when on the campaign trail, was asked the ultimate `alien-disclosure' question.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Apparently, at least one real TV reporter, with real gonads, with a serious demeanor and manner; with confidence in his voice that his question was phrased perfectly and sincerely, and, was a question of significant public concern; asked candidate Obama if he would reveal that aliens had visited Earth if he found that out as President. And, President Obama's `answer' will leave those that believe alien-disclosure is near; or even those Americans that feel he will be a `different' kind of President ----- speechless ---- because in just a few succinct words --- in just 3 seconds -- the administrations attitude is clear.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Watch for yourself, but in a nutshell it will `depend' on the nature of the aliens (his REAL answer as far as UDCC is concerned) -- and then an unbelievable `blowoff' of the original, sincere, question (much like how Obama would act like he was `flicking fleas' off his shoulder when referring to Clinton during the primaries) by the ambitious and brave reporter. Indeed, the utter smoothness of how `candidate' Obama dealt with the question in this 17 second video is unnerving. This is the link directly to my Squidoo site YouTube video - just hit play:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><a href="http://www.squidoo.com/anomalies#module15187462">http://www.squidoo.com/anomalies#module15187462</a> (see the videoclip here)<br /><br /><strong>Pretty flippant - don't you think? Is there any reason to think that Obama feels that by revealing this information it would be helpful to people? What advantages would it bring to our government? (Other than the side-show to take the attention off of the economic collapse.) Do you really believe that for the `sake of truth' this would happen?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Finally, the other reason for the move is supposedly there has been a drive to send faxes to the government to demand Alien Disclosure - supposedly a million fax drive to get attention --- have you heard a WORD about this yet from the Obama team? A WORD?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I'm of the opinion that the economy & money crisis - is so utterly the issue at hand that `alien-disclosure' - by the US Government - is about as far from reality NOW as ever before. To do so would be seen as a distraction - a boondoggle - and utterly has having nothing to do with `what NEEDS to be done'. So, it's time to face it - the last 3 statements from the government on any of this `alien stuff' - have been in no way forthright. Paraphrasing the government position:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>2007 - `The O'Hare Airport Ufo Event Didn't Occur' - FAA</strong><br /><strong>2008 - `The Stephenville Texas Ufo Event Were F-16's' - Military</strong><br /><strong>2008 - `We are not in the cover-up business' - NASA statement after </strong><br /><strong>Edgar Mitchell spilled the beans about Ufo's in 2008. (I wrote about this here <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=80">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=80</a>).</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, we may need to be even more realistic about the setting of the Disclosure Clock - which up until now has been `at the dawn' - ever hopeful that perhaps a smidgen of honesty remains in our capital and representatives. But these are politicians; and unless they see an upside to a `revelation' - only a fool would believe they would do so.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Therefore, the dawn has slipped away, and we all are now even further in the dark - and literally without hope - if the Obama's attitude you see in this videoclip is real. And remember, the UDCC only represents the government time of disclosure. The `aliens' may choose the time and place at any moment - or wait - forever. `Investigative Journalism' could get to a concrete answer (yes I write this with a smile on my face). Some other governments could come completely clean - or - the UN could exert its power and state the real position-situation for the world.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, ultimately, the UDCC - could be at any setting when some element of the US Government is forced to reluctantly admit that they have covered up the truth from the public. And, then, the time setting will move towards midnight - clockwise - instead of counter-clockwise. But, for now, the issue has retreated into the dead of night - when most of the information about high strangeness resides.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Now, go visit that link again - so you can see Obama's full attitude - then stick around and read down my squidoo page for much more on Ufo's and more. Thanks for reading - I look forward to your comments too - where do you think the Ufo Disclosure Clock should be at? </strong><br /><p><strong></strong> </p><p><strong>You can support this website and the very idea of Ufo Disclosure by visiting this link - the number one Ufo Store on the web - thanks - <a href="http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever">http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever</a></strong></p><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-719456844824392953?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-1873127135380373512009-01-22T05:54:00.006-05:002009-01-29T19:19:45.409-05:00Was Obama's Inauguration Ufo - Predicted?<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - thanks for hitting the link. Well, if you haven't seen it by now, or, heard about it - a `Ufo' streaked the skies `live' on CNN less than 2 hours before President Obama took the oath for President. I will provide that link for you at the bottom of this post - but - more important - especially for the UDCC is that `we - this website' - `predicted' the possibility of an Obama `orb-event' on December 30th -- here's that link - <a href="http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/12/could-obama-star-appear-at-inauguration.html">http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/12/could-obama-star-appear-at-inauguration.html</a>.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I based my prediction on several factors - including orbs being photographed at the rally in Chicago on Election Night - and `orbs' appearing at at least one Obama rally before. I also based the prediction on the belief I have that `orbs' might `react' to `strong desires-strong beliefs-extra consciousness focus' - and, with the largest gathering on the planet in `expectation mode' - the possibility seemed worth predicting. I also based it on my belief that at least `some part' of the `alien/entities' that visit the Earth's biosphere - have taken an interest in `self disclosure'. Certainly, making `their' visit be visible at a moment that CNN was transmitting live (even if not seen live or discussed live) - could be taken as a validation of that view - as obviously, now that it's public - Obama may be obligated to at least comment.</strong><br /><br /><strong>That said, I expect that this will NOT have much exposure on the main media - even CNN - indeed, it will be a buried story beginning today. I expect that this video of the `Orb-Ufo on Inauguration' will have about the same status that is given to the `Orb-Ufo' that was photographed on 9/11/01 at the scene of the Twin Towers - virtually none.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Finally, one last bit of pure speculation - perhaps the `Orb-Ufo' had nothing to do with `Aliens' and more to do with `humans'. Meaning - what if future humans indeed do have access to some sort of `time-travel'. And, perhaps that `access' is nothing more than a `flyover' of historic occasions in `real time'. Certainly, 9-11 and Obama's big moment also fits that bill of goods</strong> - <strong>and provides another possible explanation.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, whether it was an `alien from now' or a `human from the future' intrusion - just like on Dec. 30th - you will be able to say that you read about it first on The Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Feel free to comment. Here's the link to the video <a href="http://disclose.tv/viewvideo/16680/UFO_Over_Inauguration_of_Barack_Obama__slow_motion/">http://disclose.tv/viewvideo/16680/UFO_Over_Inauguration_of_Barack_Obama__slow_motion/</a></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>More Ufo Videos are on my webpage at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan">www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan</a> too.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>1-29-update ---> Make sure to check the comments below - especially comment number 9 -- see who is visiting this site - it's VERY interesting. Also, yesterday I posted a follow-up to this post being carried by AOL at <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=102">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=102</a> . Who knows, maybe more updates to come.</strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-187312713538037351?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com13tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-57381386660949910132009-01-19T13:47:00.004-05:002009-01-19T16:48:44.338-05:00Another Report Of A `Hanging Jetliner' `Ufo' Surfaces<strong>Hello, thanks for hitting the link to the UFO Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - today's post is about a `UFO' report from a Carolyn Z. - who evidently lives near Huntsville, Alabama - who says that she saw - for the second time in her life - a stationary 737 or 747 Jetliner - hovering near the ground about 100 feet aloft. (The first `Jetliner' she saw with her family in 2000, in Texas.) It also turns out that she was able to take a picture of it too (see the link to the picture on my daily anomaly webpage on Squidoo -- it is dated Jan.18th <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan">www.squidoo.com/AnomalyMan</a> ).</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Carolyn readily admits that her cellphone is old and the picture not very good - regardless, it is interesting in what it <em>does show.</em> For, what it shows, is like the `cone' of the front of an `airliner' - then again, if the person had not described it as a Jet - that probably wouldn't have come to mind. It's as if - perhaps - that the `image' of the Jetliner - or perception of the Jetliner - was projected `behind' the `real object'. (Assuming that the cellcamera is representing the object and not part of the object.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, really, this is idle specultion - because what I wanted to bring to light was the similarities between her description and the description of Author/Renegade Thinker Colin Bennett. Indeed, when I read Colin's description for the first time several years ago - I found it to be one of the Highest, Strangeness, Events, I've ever heard described. And, while today I will only quote Carolyn and Colin on the `Ufo' itself - let it be said that Colin's experience included missing time, and at least one `entity' trying to act human. But, I digress -- here's Barbara's description:</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><blockquote><p>Yesterday morning at around 9:00 AM when I was driving to Huntsville, I saw a stationary 747 or 737 passenger plane parked in the sky about 100 feet above a field just to the right side of the road. I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me at first because the car was in motion and I was definitely driving towards the nose of the plane, but as I got closer I realized that it was truly just sitting there parked in the sky...... The one today was painted with a silver-grey bottom and orange on the sides (like a Northwestern Airlines plane). It had no “underbelly” rocket boosters or anything. There was no way in the physical world it could have been hovering because passenger planes that are made to stay in flight while moving simply drop to the ground if they are motionless.<br />About 30 seconds after I parked the car, it started to go away (I guess the occupants saw me?). It went slow for about 5 seconds then Whoosh!, disappeared going in an upwards northeasterly direction very fast....Also, the sphere that was dancing around everywhere disappeared. The weather for the sighting was perfect, 100% clear sky, no clouds anywhere. 9:00 AM, broad daylight. </p><blockquote></blockquote><p><strong>Followed now by Colin Bennett's description:</strong></p><blockquote></blockquote><p><strong></strong>I then saw something that I have not forgotten to this day. In the sky above Powis Square was a World War 2 Lancaster bomber no less, hovering dark, silent and quite still over the square, its nose pointing west. There were no lights on it, and its four propellers were not turning.....The bomber-shape now began to move to the northwest as the light diminished.<br />To the utter astonishment of us both, the bomber now began to change shape. It changed (“morphed” we would say today) into a huge triangle that disappeared rapidly to the northwest.<br />In the sky high above the black triangle there now appeared a much smaller light than the first light, which had now almost faded to nothing. This second light raced across the sky in the same direction as the disappearing black triangle. Another even smaller light came out of this light, and executed some six complete cycles of a sine wave.<br />The entire display then disappeared, rather like a light bulb being switched off. </p><blockquote></blockquote><p><strong>Pretty amazing - don't you think. (You can also find Colin's story-link on my AnomalyMan page too - dated today 1-19.) Additionally, in Colin's case, (as in Carolyn's first experience) he had an additional witness of the Bomber in his girlfriend. And, when they returned to his girlfriends flat - there was a MIB (Men/Man In Black) in her apartment - a lying entity who claimed to be a friend of another friend of Colin and his girlfriend. Fantastically, for Colin, this all happened in 0 minutes - instead of the 20 or so it seemed to occupy in ontology. Yes, a missing time experience to the n-th degree.</strong></p><p><strong>So, what is one to make of all this? That `space-crafts' can come in different shapes and forms? (Again, on my Squidoo page and again dated 1-18 is the report - with picture - of a `Blue MuscleCar' `ufo' - in this case perhaps an example of pareidolia - a quarter word I've learned lately.) Or, that `cloaking' can be in any form - from cloaking where nothing is seen - to a cloaking that fits the singular desires or perceptions of a particular individual (s). Perhaps it is only my opinion, but any race or entity that can `get' to Earth - in all probability has cloaking ability. The UDCC has long wondered why the skeptics wonder `where are' all the `crafts' - or `mother craft sized vehicles'; - easy, and, cloaking is the very simple answer.</strong></p><p><strong>But, back to Colin's experience one last time - again, his ontology - 1)impossible craft sighting over `hovering Bomber' and evolution of craft display for him and girlfriend 2) Entity `cloaking'/claiming to be plausible person in `impossible' location (girlfriends apartment) 3) Confirmation of Missing Time --- Could it be that `impossible things' are in a Timeless stratum? Certainly in a Timeless - Space ----> Any `picture' or reality could emerge - don't you think? Or, could Colin have somehow experienced his doppelgangers space - and his girlfriend experienced his doppelgangers space too? Could the MIB also have been of the same category of being?</strong></p><p><strong>In Colin's summary of his experience he lists far more detail than my theory above - so - perhaps it would be best to sum up this epic experience with Colin's words:</strong></p><p>Certainly my “encounter” convinced me that we live in a vaster framework of being and existence than we could possibly imagine. I had the sobering thought that this manifestation was the kind of thing George Adamski and many others saw. This kind of technology, not far removed from holographic TV, could produce a “man from Venus” at the drop of a hat. It would be an equally sobering experience for scientists to find that their discoveries were part of a multi-dimensional media/gaming entertainment system of many levels of focus, development, and application. </p><blockquote></blockquote><p><strong>Perhaps that is the final fear - that `it' - `reality' isn't real in a manner we are normally satisfied with experiencing - that perhaps it is some sort of giant entertainment system. But, perhaps it isn't a hologram - perhaps the `strangeness' lies somewhere in the ontology of consciousness compared to the ontology of beingness. Perhaps in that strange state - a suspension of what qualifies as time doesn't have meaning --- stretchingggg the moment into eons if needed.</strong></p><p><strong>Thanks for reading today.</strong></p><p><strong>Dig deep into the Squidoo page so you can read the whole Colin Bennett and Carolyn Z. experiences - please look at our sidebar today too. And, if you want more of my blog posts about Ufo's please visit <a href="http://www.theheavystuff.com/">www.theheavystuff.com</a> too - and hit the ufo incidents tag for 20 more posts. Finally, check back around the first of the month when the `Clock' will be set once again.</strong><br /></p></blockquote><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-5738138666094991013?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-87376623243832223762009-01-05T16:22:00.007-05:002009-01-08T17:04:12.389-05:00The Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - The Current January Time is 7 A.M.<strong><span style="font-family:georgia;">Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - the current January time is 7 AM -- a slipping of one hour from last months 8 AM setting. If you care to follow the on-going saga of Ufo Disclosure you remember that last months 8 AM setting (a move of one hour from November's 7 AM) was due to CNN letting Miles O'Brien do a multi-segment UFO/Alien special assignment that even appeared during the day. (My readers have spoken in my poll about CNN specials - the belief is that they move all of us ultimately towards government disclosure.)</span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, perhaps Mr. O'Brien crossed some sort of line - because - almost mysteriously - his run on CNN is over. Reminds us of the sudden departure of Ms. Joyner from the local paper near Stephenville TX last spring. Perhaps Miles and Angela can link up in some real reporting? Sounds like a natural for the Discovery Channel to back with a few bucks. --------- Anyways, while the media largely ignores the renewed Ufo Flap in Stephenville and the on-going flap in Pennsylvania (and Great Britain) - it fires Miles - which results in the resetting of the Disclosure Clock to 7 AM.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Seeing that it's January --- Now seems to be a good time to review the saga of Ufo Disclosure that we had to endure in 2008 and our clock settings.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><ul><li><strong>Clock Setting Reason For Movement/Setting</strong></li><li><strong>Jan 08 - 11:35 PM Logic of where clock setting should be not logical at beginning of website.</strong></li><li><strong>Feb 08 - 7:25 AM Government's only comment on UFO's - Stephenville was 10 F-16's, doesn't address craft without transponder going 700mph. Tells big lie.</strong></li><li><strong>Mar 08 - 9:00 AM Rumored UN Meeting About Disclosure</strong></li><li><strong>Apr 08 - 7:00 AM Media ignores rumored UN meeting</strong></li><li><strong>May 08 - 6:00 AM Media exposes, then ignores, the Drone issue.</strong></li><li><strong>Jun 08 - 9:00 AM Vatican Statement on alien life, Peeping Tom alien on CNN</strong></li><li><strong>Jul 08 - 7:00 AM Every UFO/Disclosure story fades in media due to Olympic build-up coverage</strong></li><li><strong>Aug 08 - 9:00 AM Media covers Edgar Mitchell statement; More Larry King specials</strong></li><li><strong>Sep 08 - 8:00 AM UFO specials get tired on TV, Aliens didn't show at Olympics</strong></li><li><strong>Oct 08 - 7:00 AM Despite near government financial collapse government makes no movement towards `free energy knowledge'.</strong></li><li><strong>Nov 08 - 7:00 AM Orbs at Obama rally, Great Britain dribbles out UFO info to public, Aliens are no-show despite Ms. Goodchilds predictions about 10/14</strong></li><li><strong>Dec 08 - 8:00 AM Full week of UFO specials on CNN by Miles O'Brien</strong></li><li><strong>Jan 09 - 7:00 AM O'Brien canned by CNN, No Aliens on Jan. 1st, and AOL (America Online) prints this link <a href="http://news.aol.com/article/northern-englands-ufo-mystery-solved/292830?icid=200100397x1216624118x1201083147">http://news.aol.com/article/northern-englands-ufo-mystery-solved/292830?icid=200100397x1216624118x1201083147</a> with the teaser headline "Woman Solves UFO Mystery" --- (hoax sky lanterns) </strong></li></ul><p><strong>As long as we have AOL playing loose and cutesy with the truth - CNN firing its only credible reporter who doesn't laugh out loud while doing UFO stories (other than Larry King) - and aliens playing coy --- official disclosure seems only a longshot at best.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Do you like Fractal Pictures? Then go to my lens at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/fractals">www.squidoo.com/fractals</a> -- make sure to see our sidebar today too -- how about that Biofeedback machine?</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><strong></strong><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-8737662324383222376?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-48814628030470377172008-12-30T14:21:00.004-05:002009-01-02T08:34:22.201-05:00Could An Obama `Star' Appear At Inauguration?<strong><span style="font-family:georgia;">As you know, this blog is not afraid to make sure that the outlandish is at least mentioned. And, if you are a regular of UDCC, you know that we posted about how the Olympics would have been an opportune time for the `aliens' (ie:spacecraft) to `show up' and establish themselves as part of the Earth's biosphere. But, as you know, `they' didn't. <a href="http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/08/fourth-scenario-intentional-alien.html">http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/08/fourth-scenario-intentional-alien.html</a></span></strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, if you have been closely following the whole number of 2008 Ufo sightings that have been mentioned in the media (or on the internet) - you may have caught how (I believe in Philadelphia) at one daytime Obama rally - `Orbs' were filmed in the sky overhead. Multiple Orbs. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Some who saw or see Obama as almost a saviour figure took the Orbs to be a clear sign `from above' - as to who was the preferred candidate. (Or, at least, the one most historical.) And, indeed, there even exists in the internet world - pictures of Orbs in photos at the rally in Grant Park - on the historic night of Obama's clear victory. (These Orbs weren't in the sky but were just buzzing around and captured by cameras.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, is it so outrageous to think that whatever Orbs are - that `they' might decide to `show up' for Obama's first moments in office? Indeed, what if, suddenly, in the moments leading up to Obama coming onstage - there was an Orb Star - that began shining brightly? </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Could the sheer anticipation and emotion of the crowd or indeed of even the world's humanity, produce some `Earth Shattering' event? An event which would herald a coming world change? A moment which could not be ignored - a new `star' shining in the sky. Reminiscent of a previous `temporary star' in the sky 1000's of years ago.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Whether seen as sinister or inspiring - `they' could just decide that this is the perfect moment - and, guess what, you read about it first - at the Countdown Clock. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>See you in 2009 for more. Comments appreciated. And if you want more great reads - visit the blogroll on this page. And, if you like to look at fractals - visit my lens at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/fractals">www.squidoo.com/fractals</a>. </strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-4881462803047037717?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-43123567806330719982008-12-20T13:23:00.005-05:002009-02-14T17:57:33.171-05:00The Top 5 Ufo Disclosure Non-Events Of 2008<strong><span style="font-family:georgia;">As many of you know, this blog began about a year ago to follow the governments level of disclosure concerning `Ufo's' - and, - it's been an interesting `Disclosure' year, to say the least. <em>It seems that on several fronts `new information' wanted to come forward about the possible interaction of aliens with our planet and humans.</em> And, if real, this `new information' was really in a better position to be of value to most people than the <em>continued non-involvement of the federal government</em>. Indeed, it appears as if we will all end 2008 without even a smidgen of `give' in the official government position about Ufo's and disclosure. Some have the audacity to have hope in the new Obama administration.</span></strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>But all that doesn't stop various elements of people, and beyond, to make their own attempts at disclosure - even if the events lived largely - ONLY - or mostly on the internet. With all the above in mind - the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) would like to present the Top 5 Ufo Disclosure Non-Events of 2008: (in reverse order):</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><div align="center"><strong>Number 5 - `Psychic Disclosure' - the Blossom Goodchild Saga</strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>One set of folks who were convinced that Ufo Disclosure was immanent were believers in what I will politely call soothsayers. Yes, once again, the Prophet Yahweh in the United States tried to parley his one miracle `ufo show' several years ago into specific dates that UFO's were going to descend over his very presence in Nevada. Unfortunately for everyone who believes that the Ufo's are manned by black-skinned space giants they didn't show ---- again.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>But, the most publized `prediction' of UFO self-disclosure was the story that set the internet ablaze near the end of summer by Ms. Blossom Goodchild. Specifically, on Oct. 14th - supposedly over the State Of Alabama in the USA (interesting place for enlightenment to `show up') - large ufo ships were to stay in the skies for 3 days to show their presence to the world. And, with a chuckle in their voices, the story even spilled over to the regular media just before the predicted date (follow up stories or even same day coverage didn't occur).</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>And, of course, the chuckle stories attitude was right --- the aliens and their craft were no-shows again -- and Psychic's were not the place to find `offiical disclosure'. Non-Event five.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong>Number 4 - `World Disclosure' - The UN Disclosure Meetings Saga</strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>Early in 2008, nearly concurrently with strange happenings over the skies of TX., came word (complete with names and dates and times) that the UN was about to go over every nations heads and announce Alien Disclosure at some level. The meetings were supposedly in response of requests from member nations as to `what is going on in the skies' questions from more and more nations. But, nearly as soon as details about the UN meetings were announced - rumors that it never happened or were greatly exaggerated began to filter into the internet discussion. And, nearly a year later - no official confirmation of these meetings by `the real media' has come forward for public scrutiny. And, despite some folks desire for a force greater than their own nation to confirm the existence of `the alien presence' - to take that power away from the officials that have done nothing with their private information for 60 years - it didn't occur. Additionally, it really didn't get any mention in the real media on newspaper stands or on the TV - so as they like to say in the power circles --- `what UN meeting?'. Non-Event four*.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong>Number 3 - `Media Disclosure' - Endless `Larry King Specials' Saga</strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><strong></strong><br /><div align="left"><strong><em>The nature of Ufo coverage changed very early in the year for the media based on the Stephenville Ufo incidents</em> - coverage of which was widespread in the media and even entailed follow up to follow up coverage on certain aspects in near real time. Something, perhaps disclosure, seemed to be accelerating in the final year of the Bush term - perhaps the media was feeling more power against a lame duck executive branch.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>Regardless of the reason, the mainstream media - led by CNN -- had nearly monthly Larry King `coverage' about Ufo's. No longer was the coverage of Ufo's banished to only to The Discovery Channel and such. Indeed, at the height of the monthly LK specials -- we here at the UDCC conducted a poll of our readers to tell us if these inane specials were moving all of us toward ultimate UFO disclosure -- surprisingly my readers voted overwhelmingly YES. Later in the year, just weeks ago, CNN again upped the ante with a multi-piece Ufo and Alien daytime special segments (shows about 5 minutes long dropped at random times into daily schedules).</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>Perhaps the biggest change, just this year, <em>was the medias willingness to drop the stereotype Ufo description of the saucer ---</em> in 2008 Ufo's were as likely to be `orbs' in the sky ----- or HUGE in size (on occasion) -------- And often were shaped like TRIANGLES (the V shaped crafts that are increasingly seen). The result of which is an acceleration in peoples ideas of what Ufo's are or might actually be. And, with a growing awareness for disclosure. Somewhere and somehow. </strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>But, with all this subtle `softening' of positions by the media - the actual softening would hardly be noticed by the casual news observer overall. Therefore, even `media disclosure' - failed to live up to the positioning of a real event -- which equals - Non-Event three.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong>Number 2 - `Inner Circle Disclosure' - The Edgar Mitchell Saga</strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>2008 will be remembered as the official year that a former astronaut said `aliens exist' --- problem is; it is something that Edgar has been kind-of saying for at least a decade. Indeed, shortly after Edgar's interview was heard around the world - another astronaut came forward telling even bigger stories about Aliens on-board the space shuttle bay. Again, a story the media had been ignoring for years. Indeed, it's only because of Number 3 `Media Disclosure' that we even heard the probably true but regurgitated stories of respected space-humans.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>These mind shattering revelations were treated as little more than entertainment to be disposed of like old bubblegum. You see, the media likes to skim along the edges of such controversy - not go to the heart of it. The whole affair of `Inner Circle Disclosure' seemed to be slammed shut when the media finally asked NASA to comment ---- and here I paraphrase - but it - NASA's response - was something like `we are not in the coverup business'. The media appeared to make NO attempt to interview 100's of other astronauts who could have shed light on the other astronauts statements. Or even mention the billions in off budget black budget projects. He said - she said - Non-Event two.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong>Number One - `Government AND Alien Disclosure' -- The Stephenville Saga</strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>Something HUGE happened in the Stephenville Texas skies this year. Whatever happened - changed the speed and depth of local and national media coverage of an UFO event. Whatever happened, ultimately resulted in a 9 minute tape that could only leave one's jaw open - an UFO that `changed into near hieroglyphics' each second (something that other UFO's will do later in 2008). The jaw dropping display could only leave the curious human to wonder if `Disclosure was going to be forced from above'. And, with `waves in TX, PA, OH, and Europe' one has to wonder about Aliens trumping the media and the world governments in 2009.</strong></div><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><div align="left"><strong>Specifically, the Stephenville Incidents caused the ONLY official government response about objects in the sky in 2008 - and seemingly - were the number one expression of alien disclosure in 2008 - causing the C change in media coverage of Ufo's in general; if not disclosure coverage.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>The people and rulers of this planet know that `sustained coverage of an on-going Ufo event' - will result in Disclosure coming from the Aliens themselves (with the permission of the media). And, while `on-going' coverage could result from a sustained event in the skies (something that STILL has never occurred - except for perhaps the Phoenix Lights) - the other way for a sustained event would be for a media stakeout -- something that was nearly happening in Stephenville. After two weeks of happenings in the skies and two weeks of government silence it seemed something was about to break in January 2008.</strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"><strong>Ultimately, for the first time since the O'Hare incident in 2006 and commented by the government on in 2007 (that it didn't happen) ---- the government was forced to comment about what happened on one particular evening in the Stephenville skies --- a comment to shut the media up --- the comment --- the event was caused by 10 F-16's flying together. A jaw dropping F-Y - to those with an interest in disclosure about Ufo's. And, worthy of the Number One Non-Disclosure Event of 2008.</strong></div><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><div align="left"><strong>Ready for your comments : Check out our ufo videos on Squidoo at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/anomalies">www.squidoo.com/anomalies</a>. </strong></div><div align="left"><strong></strong> </div><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><div align="left"><strong></strong></div><div align="left"><strong>*= Some would view this years Vatican comments, like the UN meetings, as being of a world stature too - establishing religions place in a new order.</strong></div><div align="left"><strong></strong> </div><div align="left"><strong>You can also show your support for this site by visiting The Ufo Store <a href="http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever">http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever</a> ---- thanks for your support.</strong></div><br /><div align="center"><strong></strong></div><br /><div align="left"></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-4312356780633071998?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-91784012677439931492008-12-05T14:00:00.004-05:002008-12-05T14:23:11.564-05:00The Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - The Current December Time is 8 A.M.<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - the correct time for December has moved to 8 AM from November's 7 AM setting. The `reason' for this months move was the full week of specials on Ufo's on CNN. As you know, earlier in the year on this blog - I asked my readers to vote with their opinion about CNN's coverage about Ufo's (actually Larry Kings coverage) - and, surprisingly (at least to me) the vote was that the LK specials DID MOVE the world towards Ufo Disclosure; as opposed to dumbing down the whole subject. You can find that poll in the sidebar.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>Specifically, this CNN coverage is shown below (copied from CNN Website)</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/11/26/aliens.tarter/index.html#cnnSTCVideo">Separating fact from fiction</a><br />We explore the possibility of intelligent life beyond Earth separating fact from fiction in our search for aliens.• iReport.com: <a href="http://www.ireport.com/ir-topic-stories.jspa?topicId=41598">Do aliens exist? Share your stories, photos and video</a>Scientists wonder whether a spiral shape in a Mars photo could be a fossil. Did worms live there? Miles O'Brien reports.• <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/12/02/obrien.mars.worm.cnn">Is 'worm' clue to Mars life?</a> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/12/02/obrien.mars.worm.cnn"></a>Miles O'Brien talks to SETI scientists and planet hunters about life beyond Earth.• <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/12/01/obrien.1.800.alien.cnn">Calling all aliens</a> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/12/01/obrien.1.800.alien.cnn"></a>What do Moonwalker Edgar Mitchell, Actor Dan Aykroyd, Fmr. White House Chief of Staff John Podesta and CNN Correspondent Miles O'Brien have in common? They have all seen UFO's, believe in them or both.• <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/11/24/obrien.aliens.not.just.crazy.cnn">Alien believers among us</a> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/11/24/obrien.aliens.not.just.crazy.cnn"></a>Sixty-one years since the famous UFO incident and the place is still peddling the alien trade. We'll take you to the site where the UFO landed and let you decide.• <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/11/25/obrien.roswell.revisited.cnn">Roswell revisted</a> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/11/25/obrien.roswell.revisited.cnn"></a><br />Abductions: are they a reality or a product of vivid imaginations. We'll talk with someone who says they've been for a ride with ET. Could this really be true? • <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/11/26/am.obrien.aliens.abducted.cnn">Close encounters</a> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/11/26/am.obrien.aliens.abducted.cnn"></a>Listening to the heavens for a radio signal to prove there is intelligent life beyond Earth. What can be heard and could we make contact?• <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/11/26/aliens.tarter/index.html">Probing the cosmos: Is anybody out there?</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>As Miles O'Brien said on air - `it leaves one a little south of proof'. And here I thought that it would be Miles O'Brien who would reveal `the truth' to the nation in his 8 segments of `entertainment' dropped randomly into the CNN schedule. But, that said, it WASN'T `just' another CNN special of LK's - did include a few government folks - and - moves the Disclosure Clock to 8 AM. </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Woo-hoo.</strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-9178401267743993149?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-29883644137472369852008-11-19T13:37:00.003-05:002008-11-19T14:32:29.677-05:00CE - 5 --- Close Encounters Of The Fifth Kind<strong>Several years ago I read Steven Greer's book `Hidden Truth - Forbidden Knowledge' - and came away somewhat amazed by a number of things that happen in his story about extraterrestrials - not the least of which is what he called CE-5 or Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind. Specifically, CE-5 is when a human <em>`calls' a spacecraft into the local area <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">thru</span> a form of meditation and vectoring</em> - this art-form is something that Greer claims to be able to teach to those with an open mind.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>More specifically, the mediation is to focus on these alien beings and wishing peaceful involvement with them; and the vectoring - has to do with telling the aliens `where and when' to `show up' for confirmation of their existence. From reading the book, one would think this was a fairly easy thing to do and teach others - indeed, claims are made in the book of other folks calling crafts after being taught how to do so. Greer even makes it seem like he himself was part of the sightings happening down in Gulf Breeze Florida (late in the flap, or after the flap).</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>But, perhaps the most extreme claim about CE-5 contact made by Greer has to do with what <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">occurred</span> on March 13<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">th</span>, 1997 in the Phoenix Arizona area and what has become known as the Phoenix Lights. I will quote from page 149 (softcover):</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>---- <em>I flew into Phoenix on a U.S. Airways flight and as we were landing, I began the CE-5 protocols. I went into an expanded state of consciousness and into space and began vectoring extraterrestrial vehicles into the Phoenix area. I told the <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">ETs</span>, "It'd be great if you can do something undeniable while we're here that we can put into this footage to share with Congress whom we will be briefing in a couple of weeks." This was on March 13<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">th</span>, 1997, and the briefing for Congress was in early April.</em></strong><br /><strong><em></em></strong><br /><strong>So, essentially, Greer claims he is the source of one of <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Ufo</span> history's major mysteries. No small feat (has he proved his <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">itinerary</span> in some fashion? if he can prove he was in Phoenix on THAT night it means something ) - and one I haven't seen discussed before on <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7">Ufo</span> Websites (I'd be happy to find such material if it exists - leave a comment.) -------- Which brings to mind the whole idea of `calling' crafts or orbs - into the sky.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>As you know, if you follow my writings - I've covered this in my other blog The Heavy Stuff -- <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=85">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=85</a> (Prophet Yahweh) and <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=71">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=71</a> - (Kentucky Man puts `<span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8">ufo's</span>' into the sky). So, the point I want to bring out is Greer <em>fully claims to `have a technique' before either of these other men demonstrated it before an audience.</em> It also does lend some credibility to all the circumstances - as strange as it all seems. Perhaps Greer is a guru after all.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Thanks for reading - leave a comment and don't forget to check out our sidebar including the Greer book - makes a great Christmas gift. And, check out our blogroll too for great esoteric reads.</strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-2988364413747236985?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-632763248021656042008-11-04T08:16:00.003-05:002008-11-04T08:43:55.586-05:00The Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock - The Current November 2008 Time Is - 7:00 A.M.<strong>Hello, and welcome back to the Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) blog - I appreciate you stopping back. And, as you can see, the disclosure clock remains stuck at 7 AM - indicating NO movement concerning the US government disclosing UFO information in an official manner - unlike some of our NATO partners like Great Britain.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Indeed, for the first month this YEAR - we in the USA were without our monthly UFO special on TV - and - only a few Orbs near an Obama rally early in the month got any attention at all from the mainstream media. Seems the near economic collapse, 1000 point dow moves, and an endless political campaign was enough of a sideshow for the media to feature. They didn't need Ufo's for a few smidgens of a ratings point for now.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>That said, the ufo reports and videos don't let up at all - nor do the predictions of the aliens showing themselves. And as you know, in Oct. we had both Blossom Goodchild and more recently the Prophet Yahweh - fail with such predictions. Again. And again. So much for the soothsayers.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>And finally, of the videos surfacing in Oct. - once again Stephenville Tx has `action'. If you are a lover of UFO's being `lights in the sky' -- Oct. was a good month for that -- but - if you were looking for pictures or clear videos of `crafts' - nada. Again.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Lastly, thanks for all the comments about my last post here concerning my speculation about atmosphere creatures - specifically Rods, Orbs, and Ufo's - it was perhaps the most read post here ever and appeared on numerous websites that cater to Ufo news and speculation.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Remember to check out our new sidebar too - please - for gifts for you or others - supporting websites you like to read - especially free websites - is important. I also have a new sidebar on my other blog <a href="http://www.theheavystuff.com/">www.theheavystuff.com</a> - check it out too. Thanks for reading today - any comments about November's time setting?</strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-63276324802165604?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-67958777849275152242008-10-21T07:51:00.009-04:002009-02-14T17:59:04.349-05:00Could Some `Rods' Grow Into `Orbs' - Could Some `Orbs' Grow Into Some `Ufo's'?<strong>Hello, welcome back to Ufo Disclosure Countdown Clock (UDCC) - thanks for returning. Today's topic is about the possibility that a certain percentage of `unknown sky phenomena' (USP) actually are variations of `similar things' that have evolved within the confines of our biosphere - specifically the atmosphere above our human heads.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>That's right - today's post is going to speculate that our atmosphere - just like the `land' of Earth and just like the `water' of Earth - has `creatures' - perhaps of multiple sorts - species even. `Creatures' of different sizes with a degree of intelligence and awareness; just like on land and within the ocean. Creatures, that could be increasing to the point that more and more of them are being `seen' by the more and more humans on the planet Earth.</strong><br /><br /><strong></strong><br /><br /><strong>Here's a sample `rod' video -- there are many many others -- many of which show a more crystalline type `creature of even more elementary form than in this 3 second video example.</strong><br /><p><br /><object width="349" height="293" class="BLOG_video_class" id="BLOG_video-da701334e4e42266" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAABjzXX0P2a8vxnDt-OvRPGCuiBrIZ-6II_O-gZnlevscazkgeJNL5x0_mlpW1Vp4FGRxLy8ryMr_DKQjp_qfIPU_-4G6JszSAU8MPrmhw_dhc26dxfA3OH2EV7_B-WHlnRaKY2hN4gs-3JnK0wQdrvQ5SVsfQ9uHdyvjf64GJx6hmFhar08izaQbOn4WKd1-51asf69k_UfVnD3B0yc29TvO3Ebo2eq96QMbyFKNgkSq%26sigh%3DeTFXlz2NtJthapnwsztdQFpPS4Y%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Dda701334e4e42266%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DrTCDHWED9VzblHZceus5iFXsXtY&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"><embed width="349" height="293" src="http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAABjzXX0P2a8vxnDt-OvRPGCuiBrIZ-6II_O-gZnlevscazkgeJNL5x0_mlpW1Vp4FGRxLy8ryMr_DKQjp_qfIPU_-4G6JszSAU8MPrmhw_dhc26dxfA3OH2EV7_B-WHlnRaKY2hN4gs-3JnK0wQdrvQ5SVsfQ9uHdyvjf64GJx6hmFhar08izaQbOn4WKd1-51asf69k_UfVnD3B0yc29TvO3Ebo2eq96QMbyFKNgkSq%26sigh%3DeTFXlz2NtJthapnwsztdQFpPS4Y%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Dda701334e4e42266%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DrTCDHWED9VzblHZceus5iFXsXtY&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p><br /><p><strong>To UDCC, the reluctance of Ufo buffs to accept that USP may have more than one explanation, shouldn't be - and, doesn't mean that SOME phenomena may indeed be `alien craft' in the traditional use of the term. But, for sure, something, that is not seemingly `solid' in the sense most of us accept - is within our atmosphere.</strong></p><br /><p><strong>Is it really so hard to accept that our oxygen and water vapor rich atmosphere could harbor life? Life that could evolve - just as life has evolved on land and in the sea? Some sort of life that could evolve with just the trace chemicals and life sources found in our air itself? Something that could move fast to swoop up the `mix of atmosphere' it needed to survive - to grow - and perhaps to grow large enough to be seen `not by eye' but with camera's slow motion. <em>Something living just beyond our normal human perception. </em>Something that is becoming known as rods - or skyfish. Is some life swimming in the air - too small to see - even a big speculation? Shouldn't man be looking for, even expecting, such life to exist?</strong></p><p><strong>And, if such life forms could exist - some of them would evolve differences - perhaps it would be size - perhaps it would be intelligence. Whatever attribute(s) that would permit the lifeform to be more successful on the surface of our planet. <em>Perhaps even growing and glowing</em> - and forming - `relationships' with the human form in some manner. Perhaps humans give off some `chemical reaction' that helps these large glowing rods we now call `orbs'. Orbs that are seen on the ground and in the sky - with normal vision of humans. (And sometimes associated with `ghosts' even - the very human post form.)</strong></p><p><strong>Such as is shown in the short video below:</strong></p><p><object width="320" height="266" class="BLOG_video_class" id="BLOG_video-f2ba8c002a49a17c" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAADjB7cieHmVEItu-JNF4-KI-HZ6N5OInSNzSWovAkn8puc0bGGLrvd7mfsxddfQpaFjivZDPQw2qg_rdyOGP0BT1jqSWHwOTWnTN3GjT7zIQU9rEOgW4L3J8g8W7wXHwrircj47O8kN_6Ih7BR_OCyTyJcDUeEIxXOZwYTR9_UMKGWx-c0WbQcGIuwz54ydBpZgmjcGAaFWQ6YPBCeFIkNaTUrm3mSyrytajvRVdmEwl%26sigh%3D1JMOlEuPvl4JREostGP06gsZkFY%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Df2ba8c002a49a17c%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DKu1_PLymKSdL_6HiezigQIbv08A&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAADjB7cieHmVEItu-JNF4-KI-HZ6N5OInSNzSWovAkn8puc0bGGLrvd7mfsxddfQpaFjivZDPQw2qg_rdyOGP0BT1jqSWHwOTWnTN3GjT7zIQU9rEOgW4L3J8g8W7wXHwrircj47O8kN_6Ih7BR_OCyTyJcDUeEIxXOZwYTR9_UMKGWx-c0WbQcGIuwz54ydBpZgmjcGAaFWQ6YPBCeFIkNaTUrm3mSyrytajvRVdmEwl%26sigh%3D1JMOlEuPvl4JREostGP06gsZkFY%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Df2ba8c002a49a17c%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DKu1_PLymKSdL_6HiezigQIbv08A&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p><p></p><p><strong>And, if orbs can grow out of - or - evolve from `rods' (or should we call them robs - for anagram purposes) - is it impossible to grow the orbs into some bigger form? A bigger form that may at times `resemble' what humans have come to call UFO's? Indeed, is it really such a stretch to imagine that SOME of the USP `could be' - lifeforms developed from orb energy. Orb forms that grow into something even more sustainable FOR THEM (which happen to be able to `look like' a ufo). Literally, growing into a `solid object' at times. Or, have these type skyfish learned cloaking?</strong></p><p><strong>Check this short video out:</strong></p><p><object width="320" height="266" class="BLOG_video_class" id="BLOG_video-77c23c7e34db132c" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAAHfApvOOOB_WlESfHfM9b017fJw9ip0ZmhRb-9-e3hCSTbxH-afEvlLZj2xyhb1FUwGYV286H3yNTTkVpg0rCXJslTSFHh_VXJC9JL2zmhR3gq-eOUM5yfx3X1VOovyERkJBSQovh052ZL3b-jDauTGxWt3uzCTLOJbam0aBMv5WTbpK_gdGzI5snURsRIGZO2TAPvemr6hjflPuqnba2nWEfTY_uK7fLEY5yaI8dQCV%26sigh%3DA6OQrvnl5gDnGjUTusBEnjO4BM4%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D77c23c7e34db132c%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DI-m3NTO8HlG_3h3y_gEU54SnmqQ&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAAHfApvOOOB_WlESfHfM9b017fJw9ip0ZmhRb-9-e3hCSTbxH-afEvlLZj2xyhb1FUwGYV286H3yNTTkVpg0rCXJslTSFHh_VXJC9JL2zmhR3gq-eOUM5yfx3X1VOovyERkJBSQovh052ZL3b-jDauTGxWt3uzCTLOJbam0aBMv5WTbpK_gdGzI5snURsRIGZO2TAPvemr6hjflPuqnba2nWEfTY_uK7fLEY5yaI8dQCV%26sigh%3DA6OQrvnl5gDnGjUTusBEnjO4BM4%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D77c23c7e34db132c%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DI-m3NTO8HlG_3h3y_gEU54SnmqQ&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p><p></p><p><strong>The point that UDCC really wants to make is that - each of the phenomena's of rods, orbs, and ufo's -- may be <em>partly caused</em> by life that has evolved within our planets atmosphere. Life that has different ways of displaying itself. Life that may even be interested in mankind.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Thanks for reading - any off the wall comments come into your mind to share? Finally, for more heavy reading like this - <a href="http://www.theheavystuff.com/">http://www.theheavystuff.com/</a>. And, check out our sidebar today - lots of gifts - lots of information. Or, just hit this link for the biggest variety of Ufo stuff on the web - thanks.</strong></p><p><a href="http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever">http://theufostore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=SFNT&Store_Code=T&Affiliate=m4ever</a></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-6795877784927515224?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4174828569039941516.post-11886787256818976552008-10-11T07:48:00.004-04:002008-10-11T08:35:10.426-04:00Oct. 14th - Would Peaceful Aliens Pick A Time Of Great Fear?<strong>As some of you know, the Federation of Light, an alien entity, via mental telepathy to a woman in Australia, has indicated that next Tuesday will be THE DAY that aliens make `official contact' by keeping a spaceship in the sky over the state of Alabama for three days to PROVE that other beings exist in the universe.Whew, that was a mouthful.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>As you may also know, I've already written about this supposed upcoming event in my blog THS (The Heavy Stuff) last month at <a href="http://theheavystuff.com/?p=85">http://theheavystuff.com/?p=85</a> where I called the `expected showing' the equivalent of a guarantee by a used car salesman. Yes, you could say that I'm not much of a believer in such `hard predictions'.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>However; since I've written my THS post, the world HAS changed, especially in the last couple of weeks. What I am referring to, of course, is THE WORLD'S ACTIONS to try to save the very structure of the money system from economic collapse. And, since the world `runs' on money - we could be talking of HUGE changes that have NOT be anticipated by the world at large.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>What we all do see - is FEAR in the eyes of those trying to fix it. To save it. To keep our normal world `running' instead of collapsing into the next Great Depression or more. Indeed, the population of the world has NEVER been more dependent on our so-called political leaders for salvation. Literally, the common folk have never been so seemingly powerless and in hopes of a `solution'.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Which makes the prediction of Oct. 14th <em>much more interesting than it was just a month or two months ago.</em> Indeed, the co-incidence is a little remarkable. The world literally NEEDS some hope or answers to HUGE questions which seem to have little or no solution. The type of answers that almost seem out of this world.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, it does make the prediction seemingly - more valid. </strong><strong>But, does it really?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Indeed, would `aliens' who `come in peace' REALLY show up at a time of significant world FEAR. And, if they did, would it really give us a time of peace and calm and stability - or - would it multiply the FEAR multifold? </strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>I think the answer is obvious - fear and uncertainty would multiply - significantly. It would indeed be an event that could hasten an economic collapse and emotional collapse. It would not be an action by a peaceful set of alien beings - it would be an action by a set of aliens hoping to create havoc and disorder. It would be yet another example to the world that the so-called world leaders we all have ARE NOT IN CONTROL. It would show how powerless our leaders really are.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>(Indeed, this entire post could be used by those predicting the event - as the REASON they `didn't show themselves'.)</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>So, the bottom line is this - peaceful aliens will NOT show up on Oct. 14th. BUT, it might be the PERFECT TIME for NON peaceful aliens to make their presence known. And, it will all be history in a little more than 72 hours.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Got a comment?</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>You can also find more high strangeness in my Squidoo page at <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/anomalyman">www.squidoo.com/anomalyman</a> or on our blogroll - check it out.</strong><br /><strong></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4174828569039941516-1188678725681897655?l=ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com'/></div>m4evernoreply@blogger.com8