I didn't actually mean to sound completely support...

2004-10-15T12:52:00.000-04:00

I didn't actually mean to sound completely supportive of O'Reilly. I don't get cable at home, so really the only times I see his show is when it happens to be on when I'm at someone else's house that happens to have Fox News.

There is guarantee that he'd carry himself the same way on-air when he's calling up girls to get his thing on, but what I read of her complaint sounded more like something a romantic-minded teenager would spout than Bill O'Reilly.

I also found it odd that (if this is true) she left Fox for CNN, but then came back "home" to the Factor. I don't know all the dates of this shit - maybe he waited until she came back to start his sex talk. Maybe they had some kind of relationship that both of them are denying. I'm not sure.

But the 60 million is the thing that fucks with me. I can't confirm it either - that's just something one side in this is claiming, as far as I can tell. Truth be told, I haven't investigated it very much. If she's bullshitting here, then it bothers me. If she's telling the truth, then it bothers me. But neither of them really mean shit to me, and I have no real personal stake.

It's one of those matters that jumps out at you and grabs your attention - makes you want to see SOMETHING done about it, but then you find that you don't really know who to believe, and you have to decide you'll wait for the courts to figure it all out.

All I wanted to get across was that, although it's a shocker at first, sometimes its too easy to think that someone in power is corrupt. Most times, they are, but sometimes they aren't. I figured I'd look at the Fox News icon fair and balanced. ;> We'll see what happens.

-AJ

Comments on p i x e l s c r i b b l e s: O'Reilly update

I didn't actually mean to sound completely support...