tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3753543368049839911.post-630155778225572682011-01-13T13:27:00.000-05:002011-01-13T13:27:25.268-05:002011-01-13T13:27:25.268-05:00<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_L-O37X6d440/SNLJMpCMFRI/AAAAAAAAEvA/qfFcxQyPWxA/s1600/nfl_logo-full.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_L-O37X6d440/SNLJMpCMFRI/AAAAAAAAEvA/qfFcxQyPWxA/s200/nfl_logo-full.jpg" width="155" /></a></div>By Dan Graziano - FanHouse<br /> <br /> As a potentially significant lawsuit over NFL TV contracts drew to a conclusion in New York, the sides in the league's labor dispute traded barbs in the media Thursday over who might be to blame in the event of a work stoppage. The NFL's outside labor attorney, Bob Batterman, made the bizarre suggestion to the Washington Post that the players were the ones in favor of an owner-imposed lockout, and the players' union responded with a midday conference call to address that accusation and continue their insistence that they want the games to go on.<br /> <br /> "Any suggestion that we want a lockout is coming from outer space," NFLPA general counsel Richard Berthelsen said. <a href="http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2011/01/13/nfl-players-spar-over-cba-as-tv-money-lawsuit-concludes/">READ MORE....</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3753543368049839911-63015577822557268?l=statface.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>ContentUTDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03642950810901863251noreply@blogger.com