tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37011762.post286512628523815231..comments2008-10-19T13:27:17.140-04:00Markhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02961344955116221621noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37011762.post-64006512138543255222008-10-19T13:27:00.000-04:002008-10-19T13:27:00.000-04:00That looks like it involved a lot of work!<BR/><BR/>I'm curious what methodology you used in deciding what to say about the authorship of certain books. For instance, you say that the authorship of the Pentateuch is unknown and present the Documentary Hypothesis briefly. With 2 Peter, you assume that Peter wrote it but mention that some scholars disagree. With the "inauthentic" Pauline letters you simply assume that Paul did write them, contrary to popular opinion. What is the thinking that unites these different approaches?Chrysologushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05955087568618062680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37011762.post-35988718785178998702008-10-13T19:33:00.000-04:002008-10-13T19:33:00.000-04:00Nice job with your brief introductions to the books of Scripture. I'll share them with my parish Bible Study groups as a supplement to the study guides I wrote for them. Oh, yeah, you can check these out at:<BR/>http://www.sumtercatholic.org/BibleStudy.html<BR/><BR/>Keep up the good work. Blessings and God's peace,<BR/><BR/>Deacon DanaDeacon Danahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12089231268775182554noreply@blogger.com