News Release by UncleYap

Opposition Leader Jufrie Mahmood Acquitted of 2 Wrongful Charges Today

2009-11-20T17:42:00.009+08:00

Mr. Jufrie Mahmood was the candidate of the famous Eunos GRC battle of GE 1997 in which I was one of his election campaign agents. He is one of the 19 Tak Boleh Tahan protest case defendants today in court 24's trial which already went on for more than a year. He is also one of the many fighters who is simultaneously fighting multiple cases in the court these while, like myself. I have more than a dozen cases including appeals from 2006 until now, and my cases fixed for hearing at present already lined up until Feb 2010.

Today is another celebration in court.

While the TBT case was stood down in court 24, some of us went to court 19 (one of our very familiar court rooms) for Mr. Jufrie's verdict. This is a labor & immigration case, he was represented by opposition lawyer Mr. Chia Ti Lik who is also one of the TBT defendant.

The judge in Court 19 is none other than District Judge Toh Yong Chong who is still hearing our on going WB/IMF Speakers Cornered case. You can see that the court is now a closely knitted community with the opposition fighters already. :-) Every one knows every one, including LEEgime's mata and prosecutors.

As I heard the verdict being read out, the prosecution's case is fulling depending on a single witness who is the iLEEgal immigrant Bangladeshi worker himself, who had been sentenced; imprisoned and then deported. However he alleged that Mr. Jufrie's construction company employed him to work at a very formal project work-site not involving famiLEE LEEgime, and let him worked and stay at that site for a period of 6 months before he was arrested by LEEgime's MOM agents.

He called Mr. Jufrie as BOSS and alleged that Mr. Jufrie paid him in cash. But Mr. Juffrie told me that his company only employ LEEgal foreign workers via some agencies and all salaries are paid via agencies in crossed cheques, so their company NEVER had any cash payroll system at all. The iLEEgal Alien also claimed that he had worked during certain months during which his job was to carry things upstairs in the building under construction. But it was proven that the building was not even up yet during that month and had only nothing but foundations on the ground. So that evidence is clearly falsified.

The passport of the iLEEgal Alien was found in the workers quarters inside a simple plastic bag. But there was no sleeping mattress there belonging to him, nor there was any clothes; shoes; luggages; towels or personal items of his found at the site. So judge Toh also won't buy his testimony that he had been really living and working there for 6 month. However even when judge was not not convinced by the prosecution's case, he still asked a defense be entered instead of dismissing the charge.

Mr. Juffrie said this iLEEgal Alien could had made friends with some of his LEEgally employed Bangladeshi workers, and sneak into the quarters when the care taker (guard) was not paying attention at night, to stay there without permission of the company management. I said in that case it could be the gay lovers in the quarters had helped to safe keep passport and told him some incomplete information about the site. He lied in court and at investigation in my opinion because he intentionally did not want to reveal the actual person who employ or harbor him iLEEgally, he could be returning a favor by doing this, or protecting someone else. But his is incriminating Mr. Jufrie and could cause him to be convicted, jailed, fined and disqualified from taking part in the next GE.

I think Mr. Chia Ti Lik did a good job of defending Mr. Jufrie. We are all very happy for them.

As they returned to court 24 from court 19, there as a big applaud this afternoon.

TBT hearing is now at prosecution witness number 5, there is another 22 prosecution witnesses to go. The hearing adjourned this afternoon before 4pm, as I applied to continue my cross examination of PW5 on 24.Nov.2009 next week.

If Mr. Jufrie was convicted today and sentenced fined above S$2000, he will be automatically disqualified as an electoral candidate for period of 5 years from today. Several opposition fighters are disqualified this way including myself.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Political / Executive Interference into Judiciary, Obama PREDICTING Political Judgement

2009-11-19T13:54:00.007+08:00

The question I am raising now is Obama interfering into Judiciary judgment by an extend worst than Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew? Can a president and Attorney General openly state their own predictions on judgment of Politically Sensitive Court Trials? Is that appropriate and lawful?

Even the notorious famiLEE LEEgime Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew dare not announce their own prediction of court judgment, which his LEEgime had been accused by International Bar Association to be LACK OF INDEPENDENCE APART between Executive & Judiciary. Obama and his Official Governmental Lawyer - AG are on Yahoo headline news today predicting judgment of 911 related trials.

What kind of Democratic Reformist Star is this?

Yahoo News Headline today

Obama, Holder predict conviction in 9/11 case

AP – Attorney General
Eric Holder testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009,
before …

By DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writer Devlin
Barrett, Associated Press Writer – Wed Nov 18, 9:37 pm
ET

WASHINGTON – From opposite ends
of the globe, President Barack
Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder firmly rejected
criticism Wednesday of the planned New York trial of the professed Sept. 11 mastermind and predicted
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would be
exposed as a murderous coward, convicted and executed.

"Failure is not an option," Holder declared.

The president, in a series of TV interviews during his trip to Asia,
said those offended by the legal
rights accorded Mohammed by virtue of his facing a civilian trial rather
than a military tribunal
won't find it "offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty
is applied to him."

Obama, who is a lawyer, quickly added that
he did not mean to suggest he was prejudging the outcome of Mohammed's trial.
"I'm not going to be in that courtroom," he said. "That's the job of the
prosecutors, the judge and the jury."

The president said in
interviews broadcast on NBC and CNN that experienced prosecutors in the case who
specialize in terrorism have offered assurances that "we'll convict this person
with the evidence they've got, going through our system."

In Washington, the Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Holder for
hours about his decision to send Mohammed and four others from the U.S. military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to New York for trial in a federal courthouse blocks
from the site of the World Trade Center towers destroyed in the 9/11 attacks in
2001.

The attorney general said he is certain the men
will be convicted, but even if a suspect were acquitted, "that doesn't mean that
person would be released into our country."

Tempers flared
when Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.,
challenged Holder to say how a civilian trial could be the best idea, since
Mohammed had previously sought to plead guilty before a military
commission.

"How can you be more likely to get a conviction in
a (civilian) court than that?" pressed Kyl, to applause from some in the hearing
room.

The attorney general said his decision was not
based "on the whims or the desires of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. ... He will not select the
prosecution venue. I will. And I have."

Critics of Holder's decision
— mostly Republicans — have argued the trial will give Mohammed a world stage to
spout hateful rhetoric.

Holder said such concerns are misplaced,
because judges can control unruly defendants and any pronouncements by Mohammed
would only make him look worse.

"I have every confidence that the
nation and the world will see him for the coward that he is," Holder told the
committee. "I'm not scared of what Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has to say at trial —
and no one else needs to be, either."

Democrats on the panel were
largely supportive of the administration's decision.

"We're the most
powerful nation on earth; we have a justice system that is the envy of the
world. We will not be afraid," said Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

Among the
spectators were some relatives of 9/11 victims who disagree with Holder's plan
to put Mohammed, the most senior al-Qaida suspect in U.S. custody, on public trial.

Opponents of the plan, including Holder's predecessor, Michael Mukasey, have accused
him of adopting a "pre-9/11" approach to terrorism.

Holder
emphatically denied that.
"We are at war,
and we will use every instrument of national power — civilian, military, law
enforcement, intelligence, diplomatic and others — to win," Holder said.
But South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham
called the decision "a perversion of justice" by putting wartime enemies into
the civilian criminal justice
system. "We're making history, and we're making bad history," Graham
said.
The attorney general said he does not
believe holding the trial in New
York — at a federal courthouse that has seen a number of high-profile
terrorism trials in recent decades — will increase the risk of terror attacks there.
He also voiced support for extra federal money for
the city to help safeguard the area while the trials are under way.
Alice Hoagland, whose son Mark Bingham died aboard Flight 93, spoke with
Holder after the hearing had ended. One of four jetliners hijacked on 9/11,
Flight 93 crashed into a Pennsylvania field after passengers rushed the cabin.
"We are heartsick and weary of the delays
and machinations," said Hoagland, of Redwood Estates, Calif.
Holder sought to reassure her there was evidence,
not yet made public, that makes federal court the best place to try Mohammed.
"I guess what I'm saying is trust me," the
attorney general said quietly, as reporters and security staff crowded around
the pair.
"I will trust you. I will defer
judgment," said Hoagland, though she added she still has serious doubts about
his plan.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

A Mr. Lee's Letter To Obama in Respond to My Blog Post

2009-11-12T23:57:00.005+08:00

Click HERE for My Blog Post This Week

Mr. Lee's email address is MASKED by me for this blog post for his privacy, since I have yet asked him about posting his petition to Obama

from Anthony Lee
to singaporeusembassy@state.gov
cc speakup@yoursdp.org,
uncleyap@gmail.com
date Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM
subject Appeal Letter to compensate Minibond investors
mailed-by gmail.com
signed-by gmail.com

hide details Nov 11 (1 day ago)

To: President OBAMA

Through

American Embassy
27 Napier Road
Singapore 258508
Main Tel. No: (65) 6476-9100
Main Fax No: (65) 6476-9340

Mr President,

As you grace our country with your presence during these APEC meetings, we beseech you to take some time off your meeting schedule to meet with MAS Chariman Goh Chok Tong, Finance Minister Tharman and bank CEOs to discuss compensation measures for minibond holders and investors that have lost entire life savings due to your predecessor’s failure to bailout Lehman Brothers in 2008.

A total of S$375 million (US$258 million) worth of Lehman-linked structured products was sold to 8,000 retail investors who did not have the financial acumen to understand the risks of these complicated products. The total number of structured products, which value evaporated overnight, is closer to S$500 Million. Our misplaced faith in the US banking and financial regulatory system, together with predatory sales tactics, had left us exposed to the whims and fancies of ruthless bankers and the former Treasury Sec. Hank Paulson.

Minibonds investors in Singapore have been filing complaints and lawsuits against various financial institutions, but many lack the resources to proceed with the lengthy and costly litigation process.

The spillover damage has also been hefty. Eight town councils in Singapore – institutions entrusted with funds meant for the maintenance and running of Public Housing facilities – had about S$16 million invested in troubled structured products.

The effort of some (e.g. Great Eastern Life) to redeem the original capital injection value of these products is but a drop of water in an ocean of judiciary irresponsibility. While three of the US biggest banks have exited the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) – a fund meant to save financial institutions from collapse – and handed out US$29.7 billion in bonuses, Singaporean investors are left wondering where was the Lehman Brothers Rescue?

Here in Singapore, investors holding credit-linked notes linked to Lehman Brothers had received no coupon payments (as of Oct this year) toward the end of the grace period. Yet another event of default as US banks trade TARP funds for bonuses.

Many people have the mistaken impression that investors have been assisted by the Singapore to get a fair compensation. This is the impression is forged by the streams of feel good press statements that misguide the uninformed reader.

The truth is, Singaporean investors have been shortchanged. Less than 20% has been compensated, while our neighbours in Hong Kong and Taiwan are getting more headway as 777 Singaporean investors continue to be ignored by Prime Minister Lee who declined to meet the investors or to delegate his officials to resolve this issue. Not much else has transpired as Singaporeans are ignorant of their human or contractual rights and unable to seek redress outside of governmental assistance due to years of a nanny state under the Lees.

Former CEO of NTUC INCOME Mr Tan Kin Lian had been an earlier crusader for our rights and we thank him for it. It heartens me that our plight is not forgotten and that Mr Yap Keng Ho is reigniting the spirit of justice.

A few affected investors and I are standing behind Mr Yap’s open call for resolution and invitation to gather at Speakers’ Corner. In the spirit of American’s 1st amendment, we will gather at Hong Lim Park and make our demands heard. Demands that the US be held culpable for its fair share in this debacle.

Mr President, Although you did not preside over this debacle, the current injustice is within your reach to fix.

Yours Sincerely,
Anthony Lee

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lehman Bonds' victims must use Obama this week to make demands

Minibond & other Lehman victims should Demand Obama to RePAY during APEC
Yes! I am calling on the minibond victims & other victims to get organized and protest at Speakers Corner where you can conduct demonstration lawfully. :-) Demand Obama to Repay You, yes with US tax payers' funds and not SGP tax payers funds.

I had disagreed to have Singaporean tax payers fund or SGP public funds or SGP Banks' funds to be scooped out to repay you. This is unfair for Singaporean public interest and not their fault at all. It is bank & MAS & Minister of Finance's fault (Ass Loong Son).

Your money was sucked to the USA by Wall Street Scum Lehmen Bros. The USA should be made responsible to compensate you. You should list US secretary of finance & Obama as defendant if you want to file class action lawsuit - my suggestion.

When Obama found that your angers are against him, then he will check with famiLEE LEEgime officially to find out that you had been treated so unfairly. :-)

You have to push Obama because he can kick the famiLEE LEEgime for you, if there is a person that can do it for you, it would be Obama, not that I need to flatter him at all. That's the basic strategy I am offering you, you have a chance this week to exploit Obama.

Do it within the next few days!

KengHo Yap
http://uncleyap-news.blogspot.com/2009/11/lehman-bonds-victims-must-use-obama.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08 November 2009

Dear Yap Keng Ho

REGISTRATION FOR USAGE/ACTIVITY AT SPEAKERS’ CORNER

BOOKING ID: DM-08112009-2

DATE: 08/11/2009 to 20/11/2009

EVENT TYPE: Demonstration

Your application has been successfully registered.

We seek your kind cooperation in helping to keep Hong Lim Park litter-free.

Please print this page as proof of your registration and bring it on the day of your activity.

Yours sincerely,
National Parks Board

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Banner Demonstration During APEC 2009

2009-11-12T17:00:00.005+08:00

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Asking the dead? Get the ANSWERS while we still can!

2009-11-11T16:08:00.003+08:00

Yahoo News URL

Did debts drive him to his death?

Channel NewsAsia - Wednesday, November 11

Did debts drive him to his death?

SINGAPORE: If Mr Ng Chee Kiang had a debt problem, it did not manifest in very visible ways leading up to his alleged suicide and murder of his two young children on Saturday.

While neighbours had once spotted the "O$P$" loanshark calling card scribbled on the wall beside his Ang Mo Kio flat three months ago, as MediaCorp had reported, the family did not have any history of service and conservancy charges arrears.

"From my experience, S&CC arrears are usually the first signs of any financial trouble," Ang Mo Kio—Yio Chu Kang Town Council chairman Inderjit Singh told MediaCorp.

But six years ago, Mr Ng filed for bankruptcy, Chinese—language daily Lianhe Wanbao reported on Tuesday, citing checks it had made.

The daily said that it was credit card bills — rather than gambling, as some newspapers have speculated — that was behind recent money problems.

Relatives whom MediaCorp spoke to at Mr Ng’s wake were fiercely protective of his wife’s privacy.

Asked what might have led Mr Ng to set fire to his flat with his son, 5, and daughter, 3, before jumping to his death, one male relative said: "You should ask the deceased, all the answers are with him. What I know is from the media."

When MediaCorp approached Mr Ng’s wife, she was carrying some of her husband’s clothes out of their burnt flat, and declined to comment. The petite woman continued to remain calm later at her husband’s wake at the void deck below. — TODAY

My blog title is about Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew, who owes countless number of ANSWERS to Singaporeans from decades of his famiLEE LEEgime rules without any Transparency & Accountablity. I say liquidate the LEEgime while Old Dog Thief himself is still alive and get these answers from him directly.

It will be too late when he is dead, and his son will give us that kind of answer like above - which tells us to ask the dead.

O$P$ ? Yes! Where is our CPF$? Where is Singaporeans' Reserve and wealth? :-Z

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Lehman Bonds' victims must use Obama this week to make demands

2009-11-10T03:09:00.003+08:00

Copied from my Sammyboy.Com forum post:

Minibond & other Lehman victims should Demand Obama to RePAY during APEC

Yes! I am calling on the minibond victims & other victims to get organized and protest at Speakers Corner where you can conduct demonstration lawfully. :-) Demand Obama to Repay You, yes with US tax payers' funds and not SGP tax payers funds.

I had disagreed to have Singaporean tax payers fund or SGP public funds or SGP Banks' funds to be scooped out to repay you. This is unfair for Singaporean public interest and not their fault at all. It is bank & MAS & Minister of Finance's fault (Ass Loong Son).

Your money was sucked to the USA by Wall Street Scum Lehmen Bros. The USA should be made responsible to compensate you. You should list US secretary of finance & Obama as defendant if you want to file class action lawsuit - my suggestion.

When Obama found that your angers are against him, then he will check with famiLEE LEEgime officially to find out that you had been treated so unfairly. :-)

You have to push Obama because he can kick the famiLEE LEEgime for you, if there is a person that can do it for you, it would be Obama, not that I need to flatter him at all. That's the basic strategy I am offering you, you have a chance this week to exploit Obama.

Do it within the next few days!

__________________
uy..

Lee Kuan Yew's SuZhou-Style Naive Optimism AGAIN

2009-11-09T15:49:00.004+08:00

Once and AGAIN, old dog thief Lee Kuan Yew will brag his big mouth about his egoistic and childish optimism on his famiLEE LEEgime's ability and performance. This is the classic Lee Kuan Yew SuZhou SG Industrial Park style optimism. :-)

Old Dog Thief bragged about SuZhou SG Industrial Park & many other things that proved to be most ugly failures. But none of which he ever know any shame.

Like a naive self-boasting 6 year old this 86 year old dog thief is the ONLY egoistic leader in the world today to declare that recession is over and projected 3% growth for next year under his famiLEE LEEgime.

I predict that he will be proven wrong again just like with SuZhou SG Ind Park and many other classic shameless and baseless big talks of the Classic LKy brand.

AFP News URL

Lee Kuan Yew sees 3.0pc growth for Singapore in 2010

(AFP) – 4 hours ago

SINGAPORE — Singapore's economy is set to grow by around three percent in 2010 after suffering its worst ever recession this year, former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew said in remarks published Monday.
Lee, 86, now an adviser to the cabinet of his son Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, cautioned Singaporeans against expecting a return to high growth rates soon because of the island's heavy dependence on exports to rich markets.
"We will not resume high growth for several years until the major economies in the world have recovered," Lee, who holds the title minister mentor, was quoted by local media as saying on Sunday.
It was the first time a government official has publicly put a number to 2010 growth, and it appears more conservative than some private economists' forecasts for next year's recovery, the Straits Times newspaper said.
The government currently predicts a gross domestic product contraction of 2.0-2.5 percent this year, less severe than the previous forecast of 4.0-6.0 percent shrinkage in 2009.
The economy grew by an estimated 0.8 percent in the three months to September from a year ago, the economy's first year-on-year expansion in five quarters, according to the ministry of trade and industry.
But key industrial output during September fell 7.7 percent year on year as declines were posted across every sector. The figure snapped two straight months of expansion and was worse than analysts' expectations.
The central bank said last week that Singapore will increasingly look to its services sector rather than industry as the main engine of growth in order to soften the impact of any future global economic crises.

Copyright © 2009 AFP. All rights reserved. More »

Sammyboy.Com Thread

I say No Case To Answer for WB/IMF Speakers Cornered PS1512 & others

2009-11-05T14:11:00.003+08:00

My court document PDF file online

For the 3 days of stand off at Speakers Cornered during WB/IMF 2006 which the hearing had went on for over a year from 2008 till today, it is already APEC 2009 already :-), the prosecution has just been able to close their case before yesterday and this morning in court 19, we had just entered our No Case Submissions. I say there is no case to answer, after more than a year fighting it because the prosecution still failed to raise evidence to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.

However, the AGC had once and again amended their charges.

In 2008 we were charged initially for holding procession from Speakers Cornered to Parliament, without permit that I/O at that time was DSP William Goh - the same guy then ASP who investigated our CPFB 4 person protest; the same guy who arrested the TBT-18 plus me on 15.March.2008, then he got transferred to another post in 2008, and a new investigator took over the case after the case was already hearing in court.

When the case just began the AGC amended their charges against all 5, from holding procession to ATTEMPT to hold procession, from Speakers Cornered to Parliament. Obviously they could not prove that case, as most persons including myself did not reached Parliament on that day. :-)

Then at the very end of prosecution's case just before yesterday after more than a year of hearing, they had once again amended the charge! This time they realized that they prosecuted the WRONG CHARGE again after doing it for over a year, that the actual boundary of Speakers Cornered does not include those park benches from which Dr CSJ etc were speaking atop of! The amendment became that Attempted Procession from NEAR Speakers Corner instead of Speakers Corner itself! :-)

While this is most unfair because all the cross examinations and defense arguments were made for more than a year to defend a different charge, this should be a Miscarriage of Justice and I thus have the rights to apply or appeal for a re-trial!

Legally speaking, I have ala-by that I wasn't inside the legal boundary of Speakers Corner as stated in the charge, this can be deem very slight difference but for legal boundaries a tiny difference from within to outside of boundaries can be very significant, e.g. smoking within or outside the Yellow Lines defining a Smoking Zone. We are talking about several meters from the actual legal boundary on that day.

Any way this is my text:

11/05/09

PS1512/2008

No Case To Answer

Preliminary

For the charge of attempting to participate a procession on 16.Sept.2006 from Speakers' Corner to Parliament consisting of 7 persons listed on the charge, and ought reasonably to know that it was lacking a permit, it is the prosecution's onus to prove beyond reasonable doubt that:

there were 5 or more than 5 persons all sharing the common intention to do the procession

that the way they that they had intended to proceed to parliament in a way that constitute to a procession and not just a casual walk

that they are all aware that there wasn't a legal permit

It is the submission of Yap Keng Ho the 5^th defendant that:

The prosecution had in their case failed to prove point #1 to #3 listed above:

A) It is in the evidence that only Dr Chee had during his speech made on 16.Sept.2006 announced his plan to:

proceed to Parliament and hold a rally from Speakers' Corner

proceed to Suntec City and hold a rally from Parliament

proceed to Istana and hold a rally from Suntec City

B) He had invited people to take part, but he had not indicated weather he hold any permit or not.

C) He had not revealed any details nor schedule of plan how he had intended to do so:

either by foot or by vehicle

singly or double or in groups smaller than 5 or more than 5

when he plan to reach each of these locations

what sort of rallies and contents of speeches

who will be speaking in these rallies

D) Dr Chee had not indicated how he was going to know who had accepted his invitation, neither there were any of follow ways that people could indicate that they wish to take part:

enrollment or registration

wear a certain attire such as T-shirt with wordings

hold flag or banner or placard

raise their hands to indicate their interest

voice up to answer to his call

stand behind Dr. Chee or queue up somewhere

E) Police had not announced that they were stopping or preventing any procession, but only had instead told a legally assembled Speakers Corner Audience that they were An Unlawful Assembly without any reasons nor explanations.

F) Police did ordered some sort of dispersal for all persons not wanting to take part in unlawful assembly to leave Hong Lim Park, but then they did a self-contradicting actions by force preventing people from leaving Hong Lim Park subsequently and almost immediately.

G) The police did so without verifying the intentions of individual at the scene, except for just only NOT MORE THAN 3 PRESONS. They had however blindly assumed that all the rest of people were sharing intention of executing plan mentioned in Dr. Chee's speech.

H) Police did not issue any order of reasonable crowd management, that if the members of public want to leave Speakers Corner lawfully via which exits or how they may do so, without being treated as attempting to proceed to Parliament to attend Dr. Chee's proposed rally.

Police did not inform members of public that there were no permit for any procession nor rallies at locations proposed by Dr. Chee.

J) In Tan Teck Wee's speech nothing about procession nor rallies had been mentioned.

K) In Mr. Gandhi's speech nothing about rallies had been mentioned.

Miss Chee Siok Chin & Mr. Teoh & Mr. George did not gave any speech.

Police did not speak to myself, nor Mr. Tan Teck Wee, nor Mr. Teoh nor Mr. George

N) I had only brought the unreasonable enforcement acts of police to the attention of members of medias & public. I had not talked nor indicated anything regarding procession nor rallies.

O) Even if indeed Dr. Chee & Miss Chee & Mr. Gandhi had in the evidence indicated intention to proceed to parliament from Speakers Corner, there are only 3 of them, still less than 5. Furthermore, there is no evidence on exactly how they had wanted to proceed to Parliament, either by taxi or foot or singly or together with how many other persons.

P) There is no evidence raised by the prosecution regarding how the other accused persons had reasonably received information regarding the status of permit application or was there any application, except that the applicant Dr. Chee be the only person who must know.

The prosecution had not proved at all, what would the objective of each accused persons be, even if they might be attempting to leave Speakers Corner. They therefore could be attempting to leave in compliance of the police's dispersal order, or had their own other destinations other than Parliament when attempting to leave Speakers Corner.

For 5^th defendant who did not arrived together with Dr. Chee's group and did not wear the same protest T-shirt as that group, and had separately applied for Procession & Assembly Permit apart from Dr. Chee's application, and had separately registered to be a legitimate speaker at police post, even if the 5^th defendant had intended to follow the crowd to the Parliament, he have the rights to do so legitimately as an independent observer just like the press, as long as his movement and gestures is legally and apparently apart from Dr. Chee's proposed action. All the dozens of members of press & media also have this same rights to be observers independent from Dr. Chee's proposed actions. The court should not deem each and every persons to be a part of Dr. Chee's proposed action unless these persons share the same objective and consent with Dr. Chee's proposed action. The prosecution had entirely failed to prove the stands of 5^th defendant that if he had attempted to proceed to parliament, that he was bearing an unlawful intention to participate in any procession without a permit.

Submission on case law:

I like to cite PS1348/2008 pp vs Yap Keng Ho & others before DJ John Ng at Court 15 in which all 5 accused persons were acquitted based on DJ Ng's decision that action of a casual walk is apart from that of a procession as defined by the meaning of that English word. Defendants were acquitted because a casual walk conveying themselves from Speakers's Corner Parliament to Istana does not require a permit as a procession would.

This is applicable in our case PS1512/2008 and others, that there is no evidence how the proposed or intended movements will be conducted, it could be either a lawful casual walk with requires no permit or an unlawful procession. In our case the venues of Speakers Corner & Parliament and Istana are ALL the same as in case PS1348/2008.

It is the onus of prosecution to prove that the intended or proposed conveying of persons to the Parliament was not to be in the form of a lawful casual walk which requires no police permit. But in the proceeding during prosecution's case this is not at all proven, there is no evidence raised regarding how Dr. Chee had wanted to convey himself to Parliament.

It was also the onus of enforcement officers at the scene to verify and questions the accused persons weather which the police had failed:

where were their destinations

how would they convey themselves

were they sharing the purpose and objectives with Dr. Chee

were they a member of press or media or just independent observers

Sammyboy.Com Thread

My later email to DPP & Judge this afternoon:

Dear DJ Toh,

As the no case submission is from the defense, I think it should be only fair that defense gets the rights to do a final reply?

In essence, my position for the no case argument is that, motives and intention unless proven by prosecution by evidence can not be presumed nor imaginary. There are many elements lacking in the case.

The motive originating from only Dr. Chee is not proven that others had prior knowledge of Dr. Chee's plan in details, not just on weather he had any permits, but weather how he had intended the proposed movements to be carried out.

Even more remote are the motives of the other accused persons, including myself. There is not a single bit of evidence regarding my motive nor consent to participate in anything.

Even if myself or any other defendants were proven to be attempting to leave Speakers' Corner it could be only in compliance with the Police Order to disperse from that area. This again is the onus of prosecution to prove and can not be grossly assumed. There is no evidence on this.

Even if myself or any other defendants were intended to proceed to Parliament, it is again the onus on prosecution to prove that the intention were to be participating in anything illegal or as proposed by Dr. Chee. Any member of public have the lawful rights to proceed to parliament from Speakers Corner for objective of observation or reporting for journalism or for their own purposes unrelated to Dr. Chee's proposal or invitation. There is no evidence to prove this either.

In the very first place, what is in the evidence as Dr. Chee's plan reveal by none other than that speech, is very fuzzy and unconvincing. It is not at all logical for audience who were already lawfully assembled for a rally at Speakers Corner to follow the speaker to proceed to a number of places in order to hold a number of rallies. It is not reasonable nor logical that Dr. Chee can really expect any person to follow him, nor believe that was what he was really going to do.

There is no such kind of activity in common knowledge as a multi-staged-mobile-rallies. Dr. Chee had held so many rallies in his political life, and we had not seen such kind of complicated and almost meaningless exercise. Therefore on the ground of motive, I don't think what is mentioned in the prosecution's case can make logical sense that such a strange invitation would had convinced persons such as myself to participate in.

In the aboves I am just summarizing what I had said in court today, as well as had written in the PDF file attached.

I had at about 3PM today finally managed to locate Court Officer Jason and past him a printed copy of this PDF file for the court's record.

Thanks & regards
k.h.yap

Corruption Charge against French Chirac is another reference to liqudate famiLEE LEEgime

2009-11-01T23:09:00.004+08:00

French court ordered today that ex-president Jacques Chirac will be trial for corruptions by abusing public funded jobs to pay his own political party's workers.

Most Singaporeans can be very sure that famiLEE LEEgime's dogs and cronies had all these years been fed and fatten in quite identical ways. The situation in famiLEE LEEgime will only be about 100 times worst, as their dogs in huge quantity are fed in very highly paid posts not just in public positions in government but also in privatized GRC & GLC etc, but all under the same political umbralla of famiLEE LEEgime, enjoying the same pork barrel and guarding the political interest of ONE PARTY & one single famiLEE.

In famiLEE LEEgime, corruptions and frauds and grafts are LEEgalized, but that does not mean that they are not guilty at all. They are all the more punishable and liable.

I insist to Liqudate their political crimes, and in particular that old dog theif Lee Kuan Yew have to be punished here in Singapore before he met god.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Tak Boleh Tahan Protest's Mata Video is Online

2009-10-12T12:17:00.022+08:00

Tak Boleh Tahan Protest @ Singapore Parliament police video from uncleyap on Vimeo.

This is the police video evidence used in court to charge 19 activists for protesting against price hikes and inflation of cost of living on the World's Consumers' Rights Day (15.March.2008). The policeman who took this video is Station Inspector Amir Rudin from Central Police Division.

The arrest were ordered by (then) Assistant Superintendent of Police Willam Goh, (he is now promoted to Deputy Superintendent) all the police dare not wear uniform for this operation. Their violation of rules of law and incompetence is obvious in the video.

Pay attention to time mark @ 14:49:05 when police injured activist Mr Seelan and @ 14:50:05 Mr Seelan downed on floor of police van pointed out at the violent culprit plain clothe policeman.

Related Blog Posting of mine 22.May.2008

This is SI Amir Rudin in dark polo @ above here:
he is currently on the witness stand under my cross-examinations in the trial
he is telling tons of stupid lies in courts that undermines the intellegence
of entire court, e.g. he was using a camera but my camera was not a camera etc.
Desperately trying to dodge by Acting Blur!

At time mark about 14:49:20 I was shouting very loudly from inside of police van: "Hey You! Police Brutality!? ....." when I witnessed Mr. Seelan being hurt by the plain-clothe policeman in brown striped polo. I was inside a different police van but I could see via window what happened to Mr. Seelan.

At time mark about 14:49:49 you can hear Dr Chee's voice asking repeatedly "What did you all do to him?" but the mata was unable to answer. Mr. Seelan was nearly collapsed on floor of police van, as he was put in the same mata van as Dr. Chee.

The red line circle on the picture above shows the brown striped polo mata who was pointed out by Mr. Seelan to have caused him hurt. Mr. Seelan was answering Dr. Chee's question by saying: "this police officer attacked me" at time mark 14:50:02

Sammyboy.Com Thread

famiLEE LEEgime's Public Prosecutor Appealed against WB-IMF Anniversary Walk Acquittals

2009-10-11T22:59:00.004+08:00

I received notice from court that Magistrate's Appeal No 321/2009/01 had been filed against Acquittals of 5 activists charged for procession without permit. The famiLEE LEEgime's prosecutor had filed it on the next day of our acquittals, on the 7th Oct 2009. :-)

All that had meant is the battle against famiLEE LEEgime just goes on as per normal. And it will continue to pave ways and make breakthroughs and progress until the corrupted and incompetent famiLEE LEEgime is removed from Republic of Singapore.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Obama DON'T DESERVE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

2009-10-09T18:13:00.010+08:00

Yahoo News URL

OSLO – President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," the Norwegian Nobel Committee said, citing his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation.

The stunning choice made Obama the third sitting U.S. president to win the Nobel Peace Prize and shocked Nobel observers because Obama took office less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline. Obama's name had been mentioned in speculation before the award but many Nobel watchers believed it was too early to award the president.

Obama's administration is still in more than one Bloody War at this time, HOW CAN HE DESERVE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE? This is Unfair and Satirical. This is an insult to Nobel itself.

In the current affairs news URLs we can all see that Obama is actively involved in More Than one War as the Commander In Chief as he is receiving PEACE PRIZE:

General wants 40,000 more U.S. troops for Afghanistan

Pakistan's citizens are irked by U.S. drones

Obama Govt Demand Extradition of Singaporean Reform Party CEC Member

It is SO OBVIOUS and POLITICAL that Obama is receiving this Nobel Peace Prize. Someone is clearly sucking on Washington to nominate and award this to Obama. If Obama is not as arrogant as Moron Bush, he should humbly DECLINE this prize.

But he didn't:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama said Friday he was honored and humbled to win the Nobel Peace Prize and would accept it as a "call to action" to work with other nations to solve the problems of the 21st century.

Therefore, now I lost respect both or Nobel Peace Prize & Obama and to me, these are now no differences from those so called Awards Won by old dog thief Lee Kuan Yew, there is very serious doubts on their Authenticities.

Obama's White House is the instigator cum motivator behind the bloody Russo-Georgian War in August 2008.

I can not recall Obama's White House sending a single troop to any UN Peace Keeping Mission, e.g. to Sudan; nor South America around e.g. Haiti & Ecuador & Columbia etc which Hugo Chavez had done MUCH MORE THAN Obama for peace in those conflicts.

Obama's White House had not been doing any armament-cut dialogs with neither Russia nor China. Nor had been scraping much of the expensive US weaponary R & D programs.

Call to Action? My Foot! Obama had personally added 21,000 US troops to Afganistan just only earlier this year, and had been asked by his generaals to give yet anotheer 40,000 during this week! This is the person AWARDED with Nobel Peace Prize?! Is the world insane? His action don't appear to be WITHDRAWING ALL TROOPS from Afganistan at all!

Awarding Obama with peace prize is an insult, eqivilant to awarding NKF's T.T. Durai with Charity Awards.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

5 Activists ACQUITTED of Procession Charge for WB-IMF Anniversary Walk 2007

2009-10-06T16:07:00.008+08:00

I oppose Extradiction Demand against Balraj Naidu

2009-10-02T00:49:00.006+08:00

POWERFUL OMENs on JBJ's 1st Anniversary

2009-10-02T00:36:00.003+08:00

Mr. JBJ is in our hearts forever

8.3 quake, tsunami claim over 100 lives, wipe out villages in Samoa

Fresh tremors felt in Singapore as second quake hits Indonesia

It is proven now that shock waves was so powerful, and on the same day had hit SG shore, and then again on the next day. Not just 1 single quake but a series of it, with Tsunami. Besides there was deadly typhoon on 30.Sept.2009. Haze also hit SG. Only the heaven is in control of these, and for those who are able to read it, it is surely the omen.

Late JBJ's 1st anniversary is now also anniversary of huge quake and Tsunami, this is the will of the devine and without which there is no coincident possible in such a way.

Malaysia already saw it's Political Tsunami last year. So it will come to SGP's turn.

@ approx 1810hr yesterday, I was with Mr. Ng Teck Siong @ Hong Lim Park and we were preparing candles for JBJ's vigil, and it was at that time many areas of Singapore felt the quake. This was when the 7.6 scaled Sumatra quake sent tiny portion of it's energy over to SG.

I have accurate track record for reading heaven's signs and omen against political matters I knew from very begging stage about Bush's wars; Ah Bian; Malaysia Political Tsunami; Thug-Sin etc.

In no uncertain terms I can tell that famiLEE LEEgime's time is up, not just by a series of heaven's omens, but too many symptoms and clues had clearly told the same.

Omen is just one of the more exciting ways to put it across.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

candle-light vigil @ Hong Lim Park for Mr JBJ anniversary 30.Sept.2009

2009-09-29T15:26:00.002+08:00

Time flied and it had been exactly a year since late Mr JBJ deceased. Tomorrow 30.Sept.2009 is the first anniversary of the great man's passing. Activists are going to the Hong Lim Park tomorrow between 7 to 9pm to hold a Candle Light Vigil to remember our great late MP of Anson. I recall that exactly a year ago we were in court 15 for WB-IMF matter's trial when we had to ask judge to stand down to let us rush to Singapore Casket. The TAK BOLEH TAHAN trial is on since last week, until tomorrow.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

famiLEE LEEgime's Liquidation to Take Reference from ChenShuiBian family's sentences

2009-09-20T22:09:00.005+08:00

The ENTIRE of Ah Bian's family had been sentenced to imprisonment. That is an excellent reference for famiLEE LEEgime. In particular, Ah Bian & Wife's Life Sentences are good ball park figures for comparison. Ah Bian had ruled only for 8 years, famiLEE LEEgime is at least 5 times as long. The extend of Ah Bian's corruptions & abuses of power can not reach even a quater of famiLEE LEEgime's accumulated crimes. :-) The WHOLE of Ah Bian's immediate family is sentenced to imprisonment, plus several of more distanced Chen-family reletives involved in corruptions & money laundering. Chen-family's cronies and minions are also sentenced.

It illustrated that a whole NETWORK of corruption & abuse of power ought to be UPROOTED together, this is the ONLY RIGHT WAY to go about anti-corruption & Liquidation.

I insist that the best penalty for extremely corrupted is still the Death Penalty.

The purpose of penalty is to Set Examples for others including future and potential corrupts.

I hereby sincerely and respectfully commend the excellent examples of anti-corruption liquidations done by 马英九, 3 thumbs-up for 马英九！干得好！喝彩！

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Call on PKMS members to exercise self-restrain

2009-09-04T02:28:00.003+08:00

It is now becoming necessary to call for peace and self-restrains within the members of PKMS.

I am in no position to deal with your internal affairs, however, anything too negative spilling out of a well know opposition party is bad and could be exploited by the famiLEE LEEgime against a greater majority of oppositions. It is a public concern in particular among the oppositions supporters.

In experience, disagreements always exist among political peers in every organizations, but are usually contained. Occasionally things can become out of control. Whatever the case, we should never let our major enemy the famiLEE LEEgime take advantage of this situation and make it their opportunity.

We trust that, this point at the least can be well understood among the opposition people.

:-)

I wish the PKMS peace and harmony.

Straits Times Political Correspondent Jeremy Au Yong testiied as my witness

2009-09-04T02:07:00.009+08:00

On 1st September 2009 in Court 19, in the case of PS1348/2008 & others, I called via subpoenas for Mr. Jeremy Au Yong - Correspondent Political Desk from Straits Time to testify for the event which he covered on 16 September 2007 (LKy's Birthday) at Hong Lim Park & Istana which is exactly 1 year after WB/IMF Speaker Cornered. He was the last witness of the entire case, the court designated him as DW2 - Defense's 2nd Witness.

Jeremy is seen in black polo-shirt behind Miss Chee, the white polo-shirt in front is mata DSP Chan Peng Khuan Central Division:

Jeremy is seen in black polo-shirt at right-most of this picture:

In the matter, Mr. Jeremy Au Yong took the witness stand from 9:30am till about 4pm.

I except that 99% of his testimony to be truthful, 1% is inaccurate due to mostly his memory of the event since 2007 is already about 2 years back. He told the court similar to what I said as DW1, that the Walk on 16.Sept.2007 beginning from Speakers Corner was done in NO PARTICULAR ORDER NOR SEQUENCE; WAS PEACEFUL; NO FLAGS; BANNERS; PLACARDS WAS CARRIED; NO MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS USED; IT WAS ON THE SIDEWALKS ONLY; NO UNINTERRUPTED CONTINUITY WAS MAINTAINED AND OTHER PEDESTRIANS FREQUENTLY CUT INTO THE WALKING POSITIONS OF ACTIVISTS.

Therefore, I argued that it was a casual walk like no other road users and it had not been seen nor identified as any form of processions, as there were no physical body of a procession that passers-by and on-lookers could identify nor notice. The activists had merely conveyed themselves on foot from Speakers Corner to QRP to hold a peaceful candle light vigil. They should not be discriminated apart from any other lawful citizens and road users, as they enjoy the same constitutional rights of Equality, Freedom and Liberty.

:-)

In the even I was only a blogger covering the event's reporting, just like other bloggers such as Mr. Ng E-Jay (sg-politics) and Mr. Andrew Loh (TOC), and performed no different journalistic roles apart from Jeremy; and at least half dozen of other jornalists & camera men. All these jornalistic persons including myself did not wear any slogan T-shirts, unlike the few activist.

The only additional role I did, as I told judge, that I was policing the mata, to ensure that they did not performed their enforcement beyond the lawful limits of police powers. In the WB/IMF 2006 (Speakers Cornered) the mata did exactly this sort of Civil Rights Violations. That's why I need to police them. :-)

I said these activist were my baits and the matas were my fish. I was fishing for video and photos that would ressemble WB/IMF 2006. :-)

I am now still writing my closing submission for this case, while I am preparing to be in famiLEE LEEgime's Changi Prison as early as tomorrow. :-) for 2 different matters - alleged speech with Dr CSJ on 16.Nov.2005 & 12.April.2006 both at Queen Street Kuan Yin Temple.

I am preparing to stage hunger-strike in prison, taking only water, and token amount of bread (a finger size each every 2 days).

Sammyboy.Com Thread

LKy: LEEgime will be Peacefully Handover in a defeat

2009-09-04T00:53:00.006+08:00

Today's ZaoBao's (联合早报) version of what Old Dog Thief LKy said. Not quite the same as other versions appearing elsewhere. Please check:

联合早报

内阁资政李光耀：一旦失去选民委托行动党将和平交出政权

（2009-09-03）
● 叶鹏飞
陈迎竹
李资政还明确地指出，新加坡政府在体制上设计了民选总统制度，并确保公务员系统、司法体系、军队、警察等国家体制的中立性，就是要允许反对党有机会和平推翻现政府。
叶鹏飞　陈迎竹
报道
　　内阁资政李光耀昨晚明确表明人民行动党政府一旦失去选民的委托，将会尊重选举结果，和平交出政权。因为他所上的第一堂政治课教导他，阻碍和平的革命，必然会导致暴力。
　　他昨晚在李光耀公共政策学院成立五周年晚宴上同来宾对话时指出，他曾花了15年的时间思考如何保障新加坡的政治前途，最终说服年轻的内阁同僚订定了一系列的制度，以确保我国不会因为经过一届无能的政府领导，而失去东山再起的本钱。
　　本地知名英文小说家林宝音在对话时问李资政，如果新加坡面对可能出现反常选举结果的局面，他是否会出动军队拨乱反正。他回答前因没听清楚问题，而要林宝音重复时，趁便问了她的身份。在主持对话的院长马凯硕教授介绍她是一名作家后，才开始回答。
　　他曾在2006年9月举行的首届“莱佛士论坛”上指出，如果没有民选总统制，一旦出现反常的选举结果，一个烂政府上台，可能在两三年内，军队就必须介入，以制止它掠夺国家储备。一旦这样的事情发生，民选政府制度必然会被摧毁。
　　他昨晚还明确地指出，新加坡政府在体制上设计了民选总统制度，并确保公务员系统、司法体系、军队、警察等国家体制的中立性，就是要允许反对党有机会和平推翻现政府。
　　“今后的某一个时间点，行动党如果无法找到一个能媲美反对党的竞选团队，我们就活该要出局。如果我们腐败了，失去效能了，也会出局。”
　　然而，李资政指出如果出现反常的选举结果，民选总统将能够保护前任政府所积累的财政盈余，不会允许新政府滥用。而新政府在没有得到总统首肯之前，也不能随意更换公务员或军警首长。
　　“如果我们要推翻选举结果，又何必那么大费周章呢？我们希望一旦我们下野，我们只会在野一届，新政府将因无能而无法连任，而我们将保有能干的官员及财政资源来修复政府。不然，我们为何要设计这些制度呢？”
　　李资政说：“我花了15年的时间思索了这个办法，并最终说服年轻的同僚，让他们接受我们需要这些保护措施。我不认为下一届选举会发生问题，后一届也大概无碍，但是如果我们无法找到好的竞选团队，再过一届的选举，如果反对党组成好的团队，我们将面对风险。这就是现实。”
　　他回忆说，他早年在伦敦政治经济学院听课时，学习了毕生的第一堂政治教训。导师当时以英国稳定的政治情势为例说，如果没有一套制度来落实代表民意的政治变革，必然导致流血革命。
　　他说：“我在政治上学习的第一个教训，就是你或者有一个得到选民授意的革命（revolution by consent），不然就是暴力革命。你如果阻断了所有变革的可能性，就一定导致暴力，而一旦发生暴力，军队一定得开枪，因为你是站在错误的一边。”
　　李资政总结说，如果不是因为有这个顾虑，政府也不会设计那么多政治上的保护措施。他对林宝音说：“你是一个作家，我不知道你的想法或想象力如何。但是，你是否能想出一个理由，说明为何我们要做这些来欺骗人民？”

StraitsTimes = NO NEWS ON THIS

Channel News Asia = Entirely different (context) report on the same speech!

Political leaders cannot be trained, but must be found, says MM Lee

Sammyboy.Com posted version

ZaoBao's report basically highlight that Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew declared that his LEEgime will be Peacefully Handed-Over when they got defeated in an election. This is entirely different from what Old Dog Thief had decleared about a decade ago that he would use military power to retain his LEEgime in event of what he called FREAK ELECTION RESULT.

About time to admit that there are too few these days LEEgime can find to be willing to DIE to retain LEEgime. On the other hand, never before, angry peasants dared to stand out to attack LEEgime minions such as ScapeGoat BBQ Seng. :-)

LEEgime better take note that, I think it may be better for the sake of Singapore if they prefer NOT to handover peacefully. It is just a higher price that the nation need to pay for the change, and regardlessly the change will still take place weather it be a peaceful handover or a civil war. The Liquidation will just be more spectacular in the lack of peace. The little extra time to be taken is also additional cost, but it may be even more meaningful and fruitful, although I do insist that Singapore should pay no unnecessary price, and if paid, it had be justified and worthwhile.

The American Civil War (& Independence War) is what it took to creat a great country that once became a superpower (although it had now faded) the prices paid by the American forefathers and sacrifices had already been justified and made worthwhile. Without these costly & damaging wars the United States would never had existed.

In any way it won't be incorrect to read that the famiLEE LEEgime had been clearly cornered and forced from their past arrogant falsehood to the softer modesty of today. LKy can be said to be paving the exit route for his own famiLEE LEEgime right now, with his tail between his legs to cover his dog ass. :-)

We should continue to force and further corner famiLEE LEEgime from all sides including the rough brutal angle to ensure that famiLEE LEEgime's options are eliminated from all sides. LKy realized today that his leverage does not exist in the domain of brute military domain. People used to believe that he had that strength and advantage. :-) It had been taken care of, and he is no longer able to count on any luck from that side any more.

Singaporeans must keep up the efforts and continue to corner and firmly position against the famiLEE LEEgime.

We will prevail.

Republic of Singapore belongs to it's citizens. Not the famiLEE. Not their minions.

Our children are not to be the famiLEE LEEgime's slaves.

sammyboy.com thread

Commending the Modesty & Respectful Considerations of Hatoyama

2009-09-01T17:38:00.003+08:00

Relevant Internet news URL

Japan's victorious DPJ, minor parties to form coalition government

Tokyo, Aug 31 : Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) President Yukio Hatoyama was expected to hold talks Monday with leaders of several minor opposition parties on forming a new coalition government.
he DPJ secured a comfortable majority of 308 of the 480 seats in the House of Representatives election Sunday, ending more than 50 years of nearly uninterrupted rule by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

DPJ's Hatoyama is very modest and respectful to other parties by this act of forming coalition, when his party already got the land-side victory with clear majority control in the parliamentary election.

This is will serve as a very outstanding contrast against the Kiasu Coward attitude displayed over the decades by the famiLEE LEEgime, which held 1-party-rule and went out of the way to bully and remove out-right minority opposition such as well respected late Mr. JBJ REPEATEDLY from the parliament. LKy the old dog thief is such a coward bully and shameless kiasu compared with Mr. Hatoyama of DPJ.

The contrast showed by this comparison is the strongest.

DPJ got very very significant majority seats and absolutely do not need the minor parties small number of additional seats. But he took the trouble and additional liablity to do form a COALISION GOVT instead of a 1-party government this is so UNlike Lee Kuan Yew the coward Kiasu Ah Beng Old Dog Thief.

What did that showed?

This showed the strong contrast that Hatoyama is so prepared to accept different parties opinions and Lee Kuan Yew will seek to Squash Out every alternate voices. The greater person is the modest one, and the clown (Ah Beng) is the arrogant and selfish one.

Isn't that very obvious?

:-)

This further indicated that Hatoyama is preparing with self-confident to lead a coalition government consisting of multiple parties instead of just his own DPJ, he believe that his leadership is able to lead more than just one party to function together as a single government.

In comparison, Lee Kuan Yew the arrogant coward Ah Beng, is fearful of late Mr. JBJ who has only one single seat in Anson, when he got 82 PAp lap dogs occupying the rest of the parliament plus himself in Tanjong Pagar. He knows that his leadership is WEAK and he has no confident to get away from just one late Mr. JBJ.

What more further need I write?

:-)

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Even PAppies Need Not Be Afraid of Old Dog Thief

2009-08-22T22:48:00.004+08:00

Not only the oppositions are not afraid of Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew, today I think that even PAppies need not be afraid of this useless Corrupted and Incompetent Old Dog. He is NOTHING. Why are you afraid of Nothing?

Like a dog which dare only bark inside it's side of the fence, Lee Kuan Yew is precisely this kind of Coward. Once over at the other side of the fence, it got it's tail hidden between it's own two hind legs to cover his own ass, and he became humble and quiet. If you threaten it, it's hair will stand up.

We had seen how Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew, got slammed and forced to appologize to Malaysia and Indonesia, time and again, not just once. Just Lan Lan and silent after he appologized. It takes only someone as lame and useless as Abdullah Ahmad Badai can simply demand appology from LKy. If you remember, during WB/IMF 2006 the Old Dog Thief (告洋状) complainted to WB/IMF westerners that Chinese In Malaysian & Indonesia Had Been Systematically Marginalized. Abdullah & Bang Bang Susilo merely asked LKy to explain what he complainted to Ang Moh, and then the Old Dog Thief just Lan Lan Appologized. He dare not appologize in person, and instead he ran to his western masters in Europe and then sent his appology from there in writting.

This is exactly like dogs running back to their masters when they found themselves in deeper trobubles than they could handle. They dare not even make a single sound and just ran back to master, only at the masters' feet they dare to make a single sound. This is Tyrant LKy for you PAppies (狗德行) why have you got to be afraid of him?

http://sammyboy.com/showpost.php?p=294732&postcount=7

I had asked PAppies to stand up against LKy the old dog thief, and if you do, I will ask Singaporean peasants to stand up to back you.

Be afraid no more, Renegade Now!

:-)

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Malaysian Laws to Change, Rally Without Permit Allowed & ISA Slacked

2009-08-19T22:57:00.003+08:00

Malaysiakini.Com Today's News URL

I'm not BN's ATM, says deep pocket MP

Andrew Ong | Aug 19, 09 4:17pm

His mega bucks generosity towards his BN colleagues has earned him an expensive nickname. But when quizzed on it, Bintulu MP Tiong King Sing registers surprise and remarks: 'Don't say that...' [VIDEO INSIDE] MORE

MCA was 'upside down' after polls

Tee Keat 'not disabled or single parent'

Q&A: PKFZ sizzled like 'koay teow'

Andrew Ong | Aug 19, 09 5:09pm

Adding a culinary twist, the Sarawak politician says the trial by media was akin to char koay teow, a colloquial term for cooking up a small issue.MORE

Coming soon: A more lenient ISA, rallies without permits

Kuek Ser Kuang Keng | Aug 19, 09 5:16pm

UPDATED 7.07PM Amendments to the Internal Security Act and the Police Act will be tabled in the next Parliament sitting and if possible approved by December.MORE

Mystery letter emerges, inquest adjourned

Wong Teck Chi | Aug 19, 09 4:34pm

UPDATED 5.51PM The letter, the contents of which were not revealed, has been given to the police for investigations. Inquest to resume on Monday.MORE

It is obviously inevitable that such draconian systems such as ISA and Assembly / Procession bans will collapse. This is similar in Malaysia and Singapore as well as other Asian nations close by. The regimes are no longer able to sustain these classic shields to cover themselves, these systems became more burdens than shields to the regimes effectively. They had been hard-hit by these out-dated shields, they are painfully bruised. :-)

ISA in particular had hurt the famiLEE LEEgime in dramatic ways when JI's Mas Selamat fled ISD. :-) The Singaporean and Malaysian opposition fighters are no longer afraid of ISA. In Malaysia indeed the ISA detainee got elected while being detained, showing that the ISA had back-fired badly.

The famiLEE LEEgime which is still pressing 8 charges of Speech Without Permit against me & Dr. Chee Soon Juan, on top of other Assembly & Procession charges. But they are clearly at a point that they don't know where is their own direction, these are their serious set-backs and unlike before they found no leverage nor intemidation effects, except for an increasingly higher political price to pay. These charges only serve the function as Political Musturbation. :-)

BN Regime in Malaysia is in not any better situation than famiLEE LEEgime at the moment, Najib is forced to amend these old laws that had been used as shields by several PMs before himself. I can predict that the amendments on law will not ease the regimes plights by very much, they only proved their defeats, similar with famiLEE LEEgime's bunch legislation changes.

While they made efforts to try to look less rediculos the reflections shows strongly otherwise.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Wong Kan Seng's cheap atttempt to buy over Malaysian ISD Chief to get Mas Selamat

2009-08-11T23:38:00.005+08:00

What a cheapo move Ah Seng?!

Try to get MSK back from Najib by bribing Ramli Sha’ari with a cheap medal? Najib must had died laughing. :-)

Poor Ah Seng desperately wants to get Mas Selamat Kestari back before election. His Toa Payoh GRC is very insecure otherwise, thanks to his own Gurkhas & Internal Security Department. :-)

Poor Ah Seng....

Yahoo Singapore News URL

Malaysian police’s special branch director conferred prestigious medal

Channel NewsAsia - Wednesday, August 12
SINGAPORE: The Singapore president has conferred the Meritorious Service Medal to the Royal Malaysian Police’s special branch director, Ramli Sha’ari.
Singapore’s Home Affairs Minister, Wong Kan Seng, presented the award to Mr Ramli on Tuesday.
The award is a recognition of Mr Ramli’s outstanding role and commitment in developing the ties between the Malaysian Special Branch (MSB) and the Internal Security Department (ISD) of Singapore.
Under his leadership, the relationship between both sides has grown even closer, with substantive exchanges of counter—terrorism intelligence and joint operations against the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) and other terrorism—related targets.
The close collaboration has resulted in the capture of a number of Singaporean JI fugitives in Malaysia. And among them is the Singapore JI leader Mas Selamat Kastari, who was recaptured in Johor in April following his escape from Singapore last year.
A statement from the Home Affairs Ministry said that MSB’s counter—terrorism efforts and successes have helped to make Singapore and the region safer.
— CNA/yt

Sammyboy.com Thread

Singaporeans should Counter-Rally against famiLEE LEEgime each NDP

2009-08-07T23:29:00.006+08:00

This is the tradition since Ass Loong Son's Mai Hum Saga. I am insisting here that it should become a persistent tradition until the LEEgime's end.

I am calling Singaporeans to record each & every of famiLEE LEEgime's National Day Rally and put on e.g. YouTube, and for the purpose of posting Video Responds or COUNTER RALLY MESSAGES against it, soon after each National Day.

I call on activists and volunteers to assist each opposition parties to record; edit produce and publish these videos. :-)

There is an on going idea also for a series of Political Talk Show Online. I am calling for a concerted effort to get this materialized. There should be a series of Online Talk Shows on selected topics, recorded and published on the New Media, either forthnightly or monthly basis, runing from now till the next GE. Invite the opposition canidate, and invite the PAp - but I know that they will chicken out. :-)

Make the National Day the 1st topic, make H1N1 the next. We can do NKF; MSK; IR etc later. Don't forget also LEEs defamation suit. ;)

Need sponsorship of sound and lightings and venue, and furniture. Need volunteer video crew; editor; recording persons for audio & video; need show host and helpers etc. Public audience to be allowed to speak or raise questions. The recording should be quasi-live, and then web-casted within days of the recording.

Lets get this going!

:-)

Sammyboy.Com URL