tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3647126962862750972.post-19431761006734956802008-05-07T18:20:00.000+01:002008-05-07T18:20:00.000+01:00sun tzu: I think that the rational environmentalist and economist Bjorn Lomborg (a.k.a. Bjoern and Björn) has relly good points in policy matters. <BR/><BR/>Loomborg presumes that the IPCC forecast will be realized, but I see the AGW as more or less a hoax and believe what many scientists think today, that we will have a cool climate the coming decades and maybe a little ice age.<BR/><BR/>Then we have to adopt other solutions than if it would have get warmer, or? I think we shall always have well functioning free economies. Then we will have most resources to handle any situation.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Your link to Warden presumes that we have AGW, and it also shows the AGW propagandistic paleoclimatology proxy temperature graph (with which they replaced the "hockeystick") instead of the total revision of hundreds of proxy studies. This revision clearly shows, from almost all individual studies, a mdeieval warming period as well as a little ice age, at both hemispheres.<BR/><BR/>Actually we don't know what's going to happen with the climate, but at least a slight cooling the coming decades seems most likely. I think we shall not plan our economies. Warden uses Pangloss rhetorically, but Pangloss in a non planning context isn't lack of development.<BR/><BR/>But Warden gives us som good facts well worth thinking about.Magnushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11221398696683496883noreply@blogger.com