<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587</id><updated>2009-11-30T10:17:12.333-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Kennedy's Corridor</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>783</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-8044188712209635718</id><published>2009-10-23T13:41:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-23T15:33:25.229-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Random'/><title type='text'>The End Of The Hall</title><content type='html'>After having some time to think it through I have decided that Kennedy's Corridor has reached it's end. It was just over three years ago, in October of 2006, that I decided to start writing here. Racing was preparing for the Breeders' Cup just as it is today. I was eager to share my thoughts in a space dedicated to them. For the last three years I have sought to bring you informative and original content on this great sport of horse racing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So why am I choosing to end things now right before the biggest day of the year? Basically I have decided that I no longer want a space dedicated to my opinion. In the beginning, despite the illusion of humility, I think I really wanted a chance to make a name for myself. I wanted to share ideas I had like the Thoroughbred Championship Rankings and the 20/20 systems. Things that were a bit different from what you could get at the mainstream sites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After three years I think there are a few people in the niche community of online horse racing fans that recognize my name but I no longer consider that an achievement of any sort. I don't want to be a face or name in horse racing. I'm fully content to just be a fan of horse racing. It seems pointless to continue with something that is not directed towards a goal I consider to be valuable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This doesn't mean I no longer like racing. I will still follow racing as a fan as I have always done. The Breeders' Cup is like a family holiday in my house but I will enjoy it no less because I don't have a blog. I fully enjoyed every Breeders' Cup prior to 2006 and I will continue to do so this year and for many more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What of my standings? I created them with the intention of proving that it's possible for standings to be accurate and relevant in the sport of horse racing. I imagine that I'll continue to calculate them for my own benefit. It helps me follow racing as a fan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm sure some people will wonder if I'm having some crisis of confidence or bout of depression. Nothing sinister is brewing below the surface. I simply had a revelation that in order to do this blog well (and I have always striven to do this well) I need to dedicate a lot of time to it and I don't think it's a beneficial use of my time. In the world away from this keyboard I have many things that keep me busy but all of them are geared towards more beneficial goals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have never been one for dramatic exits but I thought an explanation was due to those who visit this space on a regular basis. In the grand scheme of things our lives will be no worse off for the discontinuance of this space. I want more time to spend on the things that do count in the grand scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for enjoying the sport along side me these past few years. It's been fun.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-8044188712209635718?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/8044188712209635718/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=8044188712209635718' title='22 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8044188712209635718'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8044188712209635718'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/end-of-hall.html' title='The End Of The Hall'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>22</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-1002233215335591469</id><published>2009-10-23T10:30:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-23T11:33:25.343-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Top 10 2009'/><title type='text'>Breeders' Cup Top 5</title><content type='html'>This is the last installment of the Breeders' Cup Top 5 for the Female side. I had already posted &lt;a href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/breeders-cup-top-5_20.html"&gt;my last run down for the male side&lt;/a&gt; just in time for Rail Trip (my #1 Classic horse) to be removed from consideration. I'm not going to go back and edit that list but Rip Van Winkle now becomes my #1 and Summer Bird moves back onto the list at #5. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;pre&lt;/span&gt;-entries are released next week so the next time we talk about these races it will be as we actually handicap them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;October 23rd&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Ladies Classic&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Music Note (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Careless Jewel (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Life Is Sweet (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Icon Project (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sadly the time came to drop &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Icon Project&lt;/span&gt; from the list. A few weeks ago she was my number one pick for the race but physical issues have basically seen her removed from consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's the Breeders' Cup so few things are as simple as they look on paper but &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Music Note&lt;/span&gt;, the 1st and 3rd finishers from last year, look like they're set to have another big &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;match up&lt;/span&gt; and all the rest will have to perform well above themselves to compete.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Careless Jewel&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; both have talent while being a bit below the standard set by the top two. Careless Jewel is more of a danger because of her speed but the hard closing &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt; could easily hit the board with the right pace and trip.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've decided to add &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Life is Sweet&lt;/span&gt; to the list at #5 as a replacement for the ailing Icon Project. Really only &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Cocoa Beach&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Lethal Heat&lt;/span&gt; got my attention as alternatives for the final spot. Both of them defeated Life is Sweet last time but I think Life Is Sweet is truly a better horse than either of them. She ought to put up a better performance second time off the layoff and realistically the extra sixteenth of a mile will help her. She needs all the ground she can get to run down those leaders.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Turf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Midday (2)&lt;br /&gt;2. Forever Together (3)&lt;br /&gt;3. Pure Clan (4)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Rutherienne&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Dar Re Mi (1), &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;" class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt; Girl (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm taking a risk and dropping &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dar Re Mi&lt;/span&gt; because at this stage I only like to list horses for one race and Dar Re Mi is among my top 5 horses for the BC Turf. I think she'll go after that spot instead of this one but she clearly could win this race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl&lt;/span&gt; has also been removed from consideration because she simply is no where near as good as I supposed she was.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I never thought I'd be going after a habitual loser like &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Rutherienne&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; but with the defection of Dar Re Mi and the less than invincibility of Forever Together one begins to realize that it may not take that much to be a huge contender here. I really respect Clement as a conditioner and I'm not really fazed by her lack of experience at the distance. Intercontinental didn't look solid at the distance either. She's fresh and in good form. She'll handle the distance and she ought to run very well. The big question with her is can she get over her habit of losing? Her last race suggests that she can.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The lack of depth in this division is nearly enough to make me reconsider &lt;a href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/breeders-cup-top-5_16.html"&gt;my stance&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Magical Fantasy&lt;/span&gt;. Nearly. I was more drawn to the eastern pair of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt; and Criticism. Criticism is a horse that fully requires added distance. I think she is even better at 11 and 12f than she is at 10f. Quicker horses seem to have more of an advantage even at 10f. Whereas Criticism wants to suck the life out of her rivals with a long and steady gallop. I think a sharp pace down the hill at Santa Anita won't exactly suit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I settled &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; for my last spot. She ran poorly in the Flower Bowl but she threw a shoe that day and the ground was an absolute bog. She is not the most consistent horse out there but on her best day she's a really good one. She was definitely a better horse last year but I think she could still have a good race in her. She crossed the line 8&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; in last years event but she didn't have a good trip. She actually got completely shut off in the stretch and had to steady. She still got a 98 Beyer for that. That's equal to Magical Fantasy's best work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I obviously don't have much respect for the western Turf fillies because I like a European and four Easterners. I suppose time will tell if that bias is misdirected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Sprint&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Informed Decision (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Indian Blessing (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Sara Louise (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Carlsbad (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not much to add about this division. I think these are the right horses to consider and I don't see much hope for any others. Perhaps a European like &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Sweet Hearth&lt;/span&gt; is a much better horse than I think but I'm not counting on it. She would have to move up quite a bit on form to win this race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sometimes a surface does move a horse forward but there is nothing to indicate that Sweet Hearth or the other European &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Only Green&lt;/span&gt; are good candidates for that wager.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Juvenile Fillies&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Always a Princess (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. She Be Wild (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Blind Luck (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Beautician (5)&lt;br /&gt;5. Negligee (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; Awesome Maria (4)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's too bad &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Awesome Maria&lt;/span&gt; is not coming. I like her as a horse and as a candidate for this race but she won't win a race she's not entered in so we move on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It came down to &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Negligee&lt;/span&gt; or &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Devil May Care&lt;/span&gt; for the last spot. I went for Negligee for a few reasons. First, she has run around two turns while Devil May Care has only gone around one turn.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The second reason is that she managed to beat She Be Wild whom I rate very highly. Devil May Care beat Awesome Maria whom I like but I think She Be Wild is a better horse right now. That's why I have her at #2 while Maria was #4.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The third reason is the pace. I think the pace might be hot in the Juvenile Fillies and I prefer a horse that can close as opposed to a pace presser.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Recent maiden winner &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Connie and Micheal&lt;/span&gt; is creating a stir because of her 95 Beyer Speed Figure earned at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; but I still think that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;McPeek's&lt;/span&gt; best chance lies with &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Beautician&lt;/span&gt;. It's very hard for big figure maiden winners to step forward after a major performance in their career debut. I think class counts for something and Beautician has class. Ken &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;McPeek&lt;/span&gt; said it best himself. Beautician already showed that she's good enough with her performances at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt;. The race at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; was to see if she'd stay and if she'd handle the track. I think the answer to both is yes. Her finishing position does not indicate a lack of ability it was really just a result of a poor trip.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-1002233215335591469?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/1002233215335591469/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=1002233215335591469' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/1002233215335591469'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/1002233215335591469'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/breeders-cup-top-5_23.html' title='Breeders&apos; Cup Top 5'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-4341508190901772436</id><published>2009-10-22T08:24:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-22T09:53:42.635-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Statistics'/><title type='text'>Gauging Europeans</title><content type='html'>Two days ago Nick Luck looked to answer the question of &lt;a href="http://www.breederscup360.com/archives/2009/which-europeans-might-be-vulnerable/"&gt;which Europeans might be vulnerable at the Breeders' Cup&lt;/a&gt;. It's a good question and I thought he wrote out his analysis well. But there is another side to the coin that was not discussed and that is the statistical record of Europeans that fit specific profiles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Europeans that are favored in Breeders' Cup races don't seem to have any more systematic vulnerability than any other favorites. Favorites have won 67 of the 194 Breeders' Cup races. That's a 34.54% clip. In races where Europeans have been favored the public choice has gone 14 for 45 or 31.11%. The difference is somewhere between negligible and non-existent. European favorites seem to be just as solid but no more solid than hometown favorites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is a bit of disparity if you isolate just the favorites that were odds on. North American odds on choices won at a 45.7% rate while European odds on choices managed only 33.3%. You have to take that with a grain of salt though because there have only been 6 European odds on favorites in the history of the Breeders' Cup. If &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt; happens to be odds on this year and wins the winning percentage would jump to 42% which is right in line. The failed European odds on favorites were often pretty memorable though. Dancing Brave, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Zilzal&lt;/span&gt; and Dylan Thomas all failed pretty badly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another relatively easy way to categorize Europeans is to judge the fresh against the not so fresh. It may be an overly simplistic measurement but look at every European that came to the Breeders' Cup since 1996 that has had more than 3 races since their last layoff. Their overall record is 2 for 48. A caveat to this statistic is the fact that from 1996 to 2007 they were 0 for 36 but last year Raven's Pass and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Muhannak&lt;/span&gt; both defied the stat. It makes logical sense that a long season without breaks followed by a trip across the ocean may not be the best formula for success.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A third subset of Europeans that we'll examine statistically are those that have come to North America for their final prep before wheeling back in the Breeders' Cup. 34 horses have tried it from 1996 to 2008 and among those 34 a full 10 of them won their preps and 27 of the 34 hit the board. That's nearly an 80% in the money percentage. But when those same horses came back in the Breeders' Cup they have recorded a shocking 34-0-4-3 record. That's no wins and only 20% in the money.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These horses usually attract a fair bit of public support because they've already proven that they can handle American conditions and often they're impressive in the preps. But of the 34 entrants only &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Docksider&lt;/span&gt;, Ace and Banks Hill actually ran better races (&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;ie&lt;/span&gt;... achieved an improved finishing position) in the Breeders' Cup than they did in their final preps. None of those three horses won their preps either, nor did they win Breeders' Cup races.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This stat does not include horses like Red Rocks or Winchester last year. Both of those horses did have European careers followed by a single North American race prior to the Breeders' Cup but both of them also had several month layoffs. The theory behind this "Euro bounce" is that a horse does not immediately feel the effects of a intercontinental journey. The adrenaline is still pumping and the jet lag has not set in at the time of their first start. However the arduous activity of a race seems to heighten the post race fatigue and they just can't replicate their form within the next few weeks. Obviously a lengthy spell on the sidelines mitigates this effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We've already seen Barry Irwin pull out &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Gitano&lt;/span&gt; Hernando from Classic consideration because of this type of thing. The official story is that he is too tired from his hard race in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Goodwood&lt;/span&gt; to wheel back in the Classic. Maybe he knows about the "Euro bounce".&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-4341508190901772436?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/4341508190901772436/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=4341508190901772436' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4341508190901772436'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4341508190901772436'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/gauging-europeans.html' title='Gauging Europeans'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-1638319075393013550</id><published>2009-10-21T13:35:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-21T13:43:33.572-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Commentary'/><title type='text'>Track This</title><content type='html'>Not sold on the usefulness of individual timing or ground loss data? How about this use for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Trakus&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;DRF&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"In a lengthy explanation to the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; publicity staff, Michael &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Ciacciarelli&lt;/span&gt;, chief executive officer for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Trakus&lt;/span&gt;, said &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt; was traveling about 2.2 feet per second faster than Proviso at the time of the foul. Had there been no foul and if the two horses had kept a constant speed for the remaining 380 feet of the race, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt; would have won by about 1 1/2 lengths, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Ciacciarelli&lt;/span&gt; said."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now tell me why this would not be a good thing at every racetrack? I'm not sure if the stewards had this data available to them at the time that made their decision but they could have and in the future I think they should have.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Trakus&lt;/span&gt; is an excellent tool that can be used in so many ways. Helping the stewards make decisions about disqualifications is just one of them but that in itself would be enough.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-1638319075393013550?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/1638319075393013550/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=1638319075393013550' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/1638319075393013550'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/1638319075393013550'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/track-this.html' title='Track This'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-5408026888479842306</id><published>2009-10-21T07:58:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-21T08:53:51.977-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Commentary'/><title type='text'>Win And You're No More Likely To Be In</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt; &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Although &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Lahaleeb&lt;/span&gt; earned a guaranteed spot in the Filly and Mare Turf through her E.P. Taylor victory, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Channon&lt;/span&gt; expressed skepticism about the Breeders' Cup Win and You're In program, noting the prohibitive fees for horses not nominated to the Cup.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="font-style: italic;"&gt; "In that sense," he said, "Win and You're In is a bit misleading."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;The excerpt above was taken from the Daily Racing Form and I think Mick &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Channon&lt;/span&gt; has just voiced the sentiment of many people in racing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Right from the very beginning people questioned the purpose and effectiveness of the "Win and You're In" program. It just didn't make sense. Then there was the issue they had with snubbing the major &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;NYRA&lt;/span&gt; races. We were told to give it some time and let it play out but let's look at how it's playing out so far this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There were 60 "Win and You're In" qualifying races this year that were won by 58 different horses. Swift Temper and Magical Fantasy were the only horses to win two qualifying races. Here is a list of all the Win And You're In race winners and their likely involvement on Breeders' Cup Day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;iframe src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tKb0EZJzmEU0mrL3SgnQmEA&amp;amp;single=true&amp;amp;gid=0&amp;amp;output=html&amp;amp;widget=true" frameborder="0" height="1200" width="500"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So from 58 horses we have just 26 that are likely to run in the race they qualified for.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tell me, from a marketing perspective, how does Win And You're In really help the Breeders' Cup increase exposure or how does it help fans follow the major contenders for each race?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Classic division is likely the worst of all. Rip Van Winkle, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt; if she comes will have all opted out of the other races they qualified for in order to contest the Classic while only two "&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;WAYI&lt;/span&gt;" qualifiers for the Classic will be there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Win And You're In does not make it easier for fans to follow the buildup to the big day. Nor does it really grant guaranteed entry because supplemental fees have to be paid for some entrants. The races they've chosen are also pretty illogical.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can certainly think of many more arguments in favor of scrapping the program than I can for keeping it.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-5408026888479842306?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/5408026888479842306/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=5408026888479842306' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/5408026888479842306'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/5408026888479842306'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/win-and-youre-no-more-likely-to-be-in.html' title='Win And You&apos;re No More Likely To Be In'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-3547997756454137511</id><published>2009-10-20T07:10:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-20T10:17:40.365-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Top 10 2009'/><title type='text'>Breeders' Cup Top 5</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;All of the major preparation races are over so this week's top 5 rankings will be the last for this years Breeders' Cup. It's kind of useless to be putting out top 5 lists when you could be pouring over the entries making actual selections. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Pre&lt;/span&gt;-Entries will be drawn sometime next week and from here on in it will be all about workouts, post positions and proposed tactics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;October 20&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Classic&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Rail Trip (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Rip Van Winkle (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Richard's Kid (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. Einstein (4)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Summer Bird (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Classic should be just that this year, although Rachel isn't coming, Sea the Stars is not coming and I think &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt; will skip in favor of the Ladies version. The Classic will be deep enough to absorb those losses and still look like a fantastic race. A list of 5 horses isn't long enough to mention all the really great talents that will be on display.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One thing that has really stuck out to me is the record of the sophomores in prep races. Not just for the Classic division but seemingly everyone. Three year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt; are doing extremely well against older horses and as time marches on I think that spells bad news for the older crew. Many three year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt; are maturing into the horse they're going to be while many older horses like Macho &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Again&lt;/span&gt; or &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Einstein&lt;/span&gt; are simply trying to still be the horses they were.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know I have an older horse atop my rankings but I think that if &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Rail Trip&lt;/span&gt; can't handle the youngsters no one will. Rail Trip is a horse I have enjoyed following for all his career. I posted about him &lt;a href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2008/12/rail-trip.html"&gt;last December&lt;/a&gt; and mentioned that he was a horse worth watching but I never could have imagined that he'd end up being this good. I see him as the horse to beat in the toughest race of the year. We know he loves the track and we know he is capable of sheer brilliance like he showed in the Hollywood Gold Cup. I love the fact that he'll be more fresh than most of his competition as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The recent performance by &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Gitano&lt;/span&gt; Hernando&lt;/span&gt; makes me even more scared of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Ballydoyle&lt;/span&gt; duo of Rip Van Winkle and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt;. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Gitano&lt;/span&gt; may have been an experienced &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Polytrack&lt;/span&gt; horse but his level of talent is no where near what &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;O'Brien's&lt;/span&gt; pair are capable of. I hate playing Europeans second time off the plane so &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Gitano&lt;/span&gt; is an out and out toss but it has to make you think that the established class in California will be up against it. So why do I have &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Richard's Kid&lt;/span&gt; on the list? Because I'm naturally contrary to the flow of public sentiment. Everyone will be looking for a European grass horse while I'll still be keeping my eye on a very solid horse who obviously loves synthetic tracks and probably needs 10f to show his best form. I was worried that his Pacific Classic was a fluke but it certainly wasn't. He would have the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Goodwood&lt;/span&gt; too if it had been 10f. He's a serious horse and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Baffert&lt;/span&gt; is as good as anyone at preparing horses for big events.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Summer Bird&lt;/span&gt; is a major danger. He is one of those improving three year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt; but he's an unknown on the surface. I preferred &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Einstein&lt;/span&gt; because he of the surface issue and because Einstein is quietly in very fine form. I know it's bucking the trend to go with three older horses when we can clearly see that the sophomores are gaining tons of ground but I really think that Rail Trip, Einstein and Richard's Kid can give good accounts of themselves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may seem like rather weak reasoning but three weeks away from a race much of this type of ranking comes down to a gut feeling. My gut says that that Rail Trip is the horse to beat despite the strong evidence that three year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt; and Turf horses are the ones to fear. It's hard to justify a lack of faith in &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Summer Bird&lt;/span&gt;, who looks like a powerhouse. Or &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; who is my favorite horse in training or even horses like &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Twice Over&lt;/span&gt; or &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Quality Road&lt;/span&gt; but I've decided to stick with these five who I've been pretty high on for months with the exception of Richard's Kid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Turf&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Spanish Moon (2)&lt;br /&gt;2. Conduit (3)&lt;br /&gt;3. Dar Re Mi (new)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Presious&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Passion (5)&lt;br /&gt;5. Mastery (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; Fame And Glory (1), Kite Wood (4)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Are there really five horses even coming to this race? I'm looking over a list of contenders and most of the horses that people are listing are likely not to come. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Grand Couturier&lt;/span&gt; endured a nightmare at Santa Anita last year. Why would he come against this year when he is far worse form? &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Telling&lt;/span&gt; is on many people's lists but he's not good enough to be a real factor. It looks as though no horse from the Canadian International will be headed to the Turf. That means that as of now it looks like the Arlington Million, Joe Hirsch, Clement Hirsch and Canadian International will have only produced one or two starters combined: &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Presious&lt;/span&gt; Passion and Telling. That is shocking and unbelievable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because of the dearth of quality I expect that &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dar Re Mi&lt;/span&gt; will in fact target this race instead of the Filly and mare version. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Fame And Glory&lt;/span&gt; has now surely dropped out of the running while &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Godolphin&lt;/span&gt; have not said a single thing about &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Kite Wood&lt;/span&gt; since the St Leger. With both of those horses being likely non runners it leaves the race wide open to a filly like Dar Re Mi. She already took on the boys in the Arc and was far from disgraced. I think she'll still have a very tough time with Spanish Moon and Conduit but she's a legitimate threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Presious&lt;/span&gt; Passion&lt;/span&gt; is also a horse with a winning chance and the shorter the field the better he'll do. His opponents will be seriously looking at options for pacemakers because aside from Spanish Moon none of the other names floating around have any semblance of speed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although he hasn't been mentioned I think &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Take The Points&lt;/span&gt; will show up. Connections should see this as an easy spot to grab some notoriety. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Pletcher&lt;/span&gt; always likes to have runners on big race days and although Take The Points doesn't really fit in the Turf. He fits here more than anywhere else and this race looks much easier than the Mile.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I decided to go with &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mastery&lt;/span&gt; for the last spot on the list. I know &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Godolphin&lt;/span&gt; has been talking about the Marathon with this horse but when they get a glimpse of the competition how could choose a $500k ungraded event instead of the Turf? Mastery is a G-1 winner on fast ground and the St. Leger was a successful stepping stone for both Conduit and Red Rocks. The temptation to chase the big prize will probably draw them here and Mastery has a realistic chance because the field lacks depth at the moment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Mile&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Delegator&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Ferneley&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Zacinto&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Court Vision (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Whatsthescript&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last week when I compiled this list I said that the 5&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; spot was being reserved for the most impressive horse to emerge from the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;Shadwell&lt;/span&gt; Mile and Oak Tree Mile. I have to admit that now having seen those races I believe that none of those horses are likely to win the Mile. The bar set by horses like &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;Delegator&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is much too high.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is plenty to like about Court Vision, Cowboy Cal and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;Karelian&lt;/span&gt; even if you think as I do, that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt; will be nearly untouchable. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Court Vision&lt;/span&gt; seems to be responding very well to his new barn and since his surgery. I expect an improved effort from him on firm ground. I think it's significant that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;IEAH&lt;/span&gt; is holding out &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;Diamondrella&lt;/span&gt; from this race because of what they see in Court Vision. If Diamondrella was running in this race she would be near the top of my list. I really wanted to see him run a lifetime best effort in this race to show that a Mile suits him perfectly but I was left with the impression that 9f is still likely his best distance. I went with him because of the intangible feeling that this horse has been sitting on some world class talent since the beginning but that Mott struggled to get it out of him. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38"&gt;Dutrow&lt;/span&gt; has a way of figuring out horses like that and he may even take a big enough step forward to pull off the upset. Maybe &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt; won't be untouchable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40"&gt;Karelian&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is a very admirable horse who is unquestionably a mile specialist but I think the circumstances are just against him. He is a 7 year old who has been notoriously unfit since the fall of 07'. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41"&gt;Shadwell&lt;/span&gt; was an unbelievable performance considering that it was his first of the season and that he is not naturally a speed horse. But my worry is that this old gelding won't be able to gear up again in a month. Performances like that often lead to regression in older horses unless they get a bit more time on the bench. If he had got another start in this year I'd be preferring &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42"&gt;Karelian&lt;/span&gt; to Court Vision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Cowboy Cal&lt;/span&gt; is a classic example of a horse that is good at everything but not great at anything. He wins the races he ought to win because he is tough and classy but when special horses show up against him he always takes a back seat. Cowboy Cal has an excellent chance to hit the board in the BC Mile. He is undefeated at the distance and you could see how stubborn he gets. In races 8f-9f Cowboy Cal is 12-7-4-1. He has only missed the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43"&gt;exacta&lt;/span&gt; once. The reason I haven't put him on my list is that I'm not trying to pick the horse that will be second or third. I'm looking for horses with the best winning chance. Cowboy Cal is a far steadier prospect than Court Vision but Court Vision has that upside potential that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44"&gt;Pletcher's&lt;/span&gt; horse just doesn't have. what you see is what you get with Cowboy Cal and it's only going to be good enough for second place at best. At least with Court Vision there is that slim chance that the firm turf could really bring him to life and he'd fulfill that potential connections always saw in him.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sprint&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Fatal Bullet (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_54"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_56"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_46"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (5)&lt;br /&gt;4. Capt. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_47"&gt;Candyman&lt;/span&gt; Can (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. Delta Storm (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_55"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_48"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (3), Hollywood Hit (4)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like the Turf this race is struggling to find runners but unlike the Turf there is still going to be quite a bit of quality. The loss of Fabulous Strike and Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_49"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; is significant but &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_50"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt;, Fatal Bullet and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_51"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt; are all good enough to make this a legitimate championship event.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have been a strong supporter of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Fatal Bullet&lt;/span&gt; all year long. I know the hype is with &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_52"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; and that Fatal Bullet has not had a championship caliber campaign. But in a one race situation I still think he is the best synthetic sprinter in the world. He has lost just on synthetic sprint at 6.5f or less and it took the fabulous Midnight Lute to beat him. All of his last 7 races on synthetics have seen him earn triple digit &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_53"&gt;Beyers&lt;/span&gt;. Now this doesn't really set him apart from &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_54"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; who is undefeated in synthetic sprints and has also earned triple digit &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_55"&gt;Beyers&lt;/span&gt; in every synthetic sprint race he has run. My case for Fatal Bullet is based more on visual impression, the strength of his competition and the fact that he has shown the ability to rate a bit. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_56"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; is a bit less reserved and he has never faced any horses like the ones he'll be facing in the Sprint.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_57"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; has inherited the spot of closer most likely to swoop past the dueling pair of Fatal Bullet and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_58"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt;. The threat of an all out speed duel with those two is very real and with Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_59"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; pulling out of the Sprint it's left to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_60"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt; to run them down. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_61"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt; has exuded class all his life and he is quite effective going longer as well. What I like about him is that he makes winning seem like no big deal. The Ancient Title was a good performance but it seemed like &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_62"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt; was only going at workout pace. It took very little for him to sweep to the lead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Capt. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_63"&gt;Candyman&lt;/span&gt; Can&lt;/span&gt; is one of the most admirable horses in training. He has never earned massive figures for his work but he has been nothing but solid all of his life. He has run in 7 sprint races in his career and the only horses to have beaten him fairly are Quality Road and Fatal Bullet. I'm not sure that he can close as effectively at 6f as &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_64"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt; can but he'll be another closer looking dangerous in the final furlong.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was deeply saddened to hear that &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Hollywood Hit&lt;/span&gt; has been suspended for 90 days because he was found to have a tranquilizer in his system during his last race. I must say that I find it odd that the horse himself is barred from running instead of a sanction being brought on the trainer. Either way the BC Sprint has lost a legitimate threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who else is coming to this race? I have no idea to be honest. I'm interested in &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Crown of Thorns&lt;/span&gt; but he's on the fence for this race and even for the Breeders' Cup at all. My feeling is that he is more likely for the Dirt Mile.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have tossed &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Delta Storm&lt;/span&gt; on the list because he has a decent and consistent record on synthetics. I don't he has a realistic chance of winning and he should be 40/1 but he usually runs his race and the evidence suggests that he's as good as he's ever been. That's probably not good enough but stranger things have happened in racing. All we know is that 6f on a synthetic track fits him well and he's capable of running a good race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Juvenile&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_73"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_65"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_74"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_66"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_67"&gt;Aikenite&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;4. Aspire (5)&lt;br /&gt;5. Noble's Promise (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Dave in Dixie (3),  Dublin (4)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When the Juvenile is hosted in the West it is usually won by a western horse. I have two westerners atop my list although I think that the form is really very close between all these five horses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_68"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Noble's Promise&lt;/span&gt; are both major synthetic prep winners that have good tactical speed and decent figures. They also both come from barns that are excellent with two year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_69"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On my list they bookend a trio of classy closers who should all have a big say. Pace meltdowns in the Juvenile are hardly rare. With all those young horses keyed up by the crowds it doesn't take much to wind up with a speed duel. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_70"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; has proven that he can close effectively on this track. He is not a stakes winner but he is one of the few non stakes winners that will enter the juvenile having won a two turn race. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_71"&gt;Biancone&lt;/span&gt; has a good one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think there is very little to separate &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_72"&gt;Aikenite&lt;/span&gt; and Aspire. The reason I have &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_73"&gt;Aikenite&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; a bit higher is that he got the two turn synthetic prep while Aspire got a one turn dirt prep. It was still a route race for Aspire but it just gives me a bit less confidence in him. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_74"&gt;Aikenite&lt;/span&gt; had closed hard in both of his last two G-1 races but he definitely looked better on the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_75"&gt;Polytrack&lt;/span&gt; at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_76"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; than he did on the main track at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_77"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Aspire&lt;/span&gt; might be a bit of a hidden gem because he never really got to run in the Champagne. I thought he was the horse to beat going into that race and coming out of it I think he is the horse with the brightest future. I don't know what synthetics do to his chances but I will definitely be rooting for Aspire in the juvenile.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-3547997756454137511?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/3547997756454137511/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=3547997756454137511' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/3547997756454137511'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/3547997756454137511'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/breeders-cup-top-5_20.html' title='Breeders&apos; Cup Top 5'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-3043033300573702563</id><published>2009-10-19T11:43:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-19T13:11:43.892-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Review'/><title type='text'>Weekend Review</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Weekend Overview:&lt;/span&gt; Woodbine hosted the major action of the weekend and the races provided a good mixture between being &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;formful&lt;/span&gt; and downright crazy. I was surprised to see Champs &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Elysees&lt;/span&gt; made the favorite in the Canadian International. I would have thought that Jukebox Jury with his flashy European form would command most of the attention but the public got it spot on. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Lahaleed&lt;/span&gt; raised some eyebrows with her win in the E.P. Taylor off of very little back form. It's no surprise that she was 44/1 but evidently North America suits her very well because she never would have handled Rainbow View back home. I hope people have noticed that once again the three year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt; did so well against their elders. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Lahaleeb&lt;/span&gt; and Rainbow View completed the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;exacta&lt;/span&gt; in the E.P. Taylor with Eastern Aria running 4&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; and Jukebox Jury almost won the International for the sophomore class. On the heels of wins by Summer Bird and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Gitano&lt;/span&gt; Hernando it appears that the older horses are weaker than usual. I was pretty surprised to see &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl run as flatly as she did. I overestimated her quality by quite a bit. She's a good horse but pretty ordinary amongst her peers. She won't be a factor in the Breeders' Cup. Jackson Bend raised an eyebrow or two when he won the In Reality at Calder earning a 100 Beyer. He had a tough trip but he overcame the adversity and was very impressive. The steady little Canadian El &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Brujo&lt;/span&gt; won his second consecutive Graded Stakes race south of the border. He doesn't get big figures but he just keeps plodding along. His great form makes the suspension of Hollywood Hit look all the more unfortunate. Hollywood Hit was on a major hot streak, it's a shame to see him sidelined for 90 days because he had a tranquilizer in his system. I know there are differing viewpoints on that subject but I think it's unfair to suspend the horse specifically.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SP5rQnrVzCCUQ"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Thoroughbred Championship Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; The standings have finally been updated, I missed doing it last week because I was out of town but quite honestly things did not change as much as I thought they might. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt; confirmed herself as the Older Female to beat. The Older Males lost yet another race to the three year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt; in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Goodwood&lt;/span&gt; and Magical Fantasy continued to dominate the west coast turf. Forever Together is now forced into a position where she definitely has to win the BC Filly and Mare Turf if she wants to be champion again. Magical Fantasy has built up too much of a lead otherwise. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt; burst onto the Male Sprinters scene and suddenly has a mathematical chance of reaching first place. The BC Sprint will be a major determining factor as it should be but sadly Fatal Bullet's meager campaign leaves him out of the running.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SO-kKqPTNhMOQ"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Power Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Perhaps the tightest division right now is the Two Year Old Female division. There really isn't much to separate the best from the rest. There is a difference of just 3.42 from 1st to 5&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Nearctic&lt;/span&gt; winner Field Commission is sneaking up the sprinter standings. A good showing in the BC Turf Sprint may actually make him one of the year's top 5 sprinters. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Girolamo&lt;/span&gt; is also among the upwardly mobile. He is now just 6&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; among active Three Year Old Males. It looks like there is more to come from this &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Godolphin&lt;/span&gt; colt as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Performance of the Week:&lt;/span&gt; There is no question that Jackson Bend was the most impressive performer of the week. If you have not seen the In Reality Stakes then go to &lt;a href="http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/default.aspx"&gt;Thoroughbred Times&lt;/a&gt; and check it out. This site, in case you weren't aware, has free links to stakes races both graded and ungraded. Jackson Bend was looking for a sweep of the Florida Stallion series but it looked unlikely after he went down to his nose soon after the break. Young horses rarely come back from that but he regained his rhythm pretty quickly and was in a good stalking position down the backside. Jeffrey Sanchez likely went for home a bit prematurely around the far turn and Jackson Bend again looked in real trouble as Thank U Phillipe came right up beside him near the 1/8&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; pole. But Jackson Bend fended off the challenge and went on to win by nearly 3 lengths! It was an unbelievable race, certainly the best route performance by any 2yo this year. The 100 Beyer figure confirms the class of the event. It's the highest number earned by a juvenile going two turns. Jackson Bend has now won 5 of 6 starts and is the only horse to have defeated &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;D'Funnybone&lt;/span&gt;. Put him on your short list of horses to watch in the future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=42494"&gt;Race of the Week:&lt;/a&gt; I thought the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Nearctic&lt;/span&gt; Stakes was the most engaging of the weekend. Turf sprints tend to always be a little hectic and this one was no exception. Maybe I liked the race so much because of the good performances by Field Commission and Jungle Wave. I have a soft spot for these two Canadian based sprinters. Field Commission made an excellent move in the stretch to come between horses then flash by the dueling leaders. Maybe a few of these will turn up at Santa Anita in a few weeks. I don't think they'd be too over matched.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=42496"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Flop of the Week:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I think it likely has to be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl or Look Here. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl was facing a very ordinary cast of 3yo fillies and she had previously suggested that she was a great deal more than ordinary. That illusion is certainly dispelled. Look Here just never raised a hoof in the E.P Taylor. Here is a filly that won the Epsom Oaks, finish third against 3yo males in the St Leger and had been narrowly denied in a pair of tough graded stakes against older males. So what happens when she faces the softest field since her second career race? She runs next to last.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=42496"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Tip &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;O'the&lt;/span&gt; Cap:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; A horse I have been hard on for virtually all his career is Champs &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Elysees&lt;/span&gt;. He was bred to be a great one and I suppose it was the weight of expectation that resulted in the perception that he was an underachiever. But now with his career now ended I think he deserves a bit of a salute. The Canadian International was likely his greatest performance. He closed with a lot of determination to get Jukebox Jury. He may have only won six times but he struck three times at the G-1 level. All in all he was a solid performer. He was not in the same bracket as his illustrious siblings but 3 G-1 wins is a good haul for any horse.  His racing career was not one that will attract breeders but the blood that flows through his veins could only be described as royal blue. I wish him the best of luck at stud.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-3043033300573702563?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/3043033300573702563/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=3043033300573702563' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/3043033300573702563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/3043033300573702563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/weekend-review_19.html' title='Weekend Review'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-2678063780811503202</id><published>2009-10-16T09:02:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-16T10:11:28.051-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Top 10 2009'/><title type='text'>Breeders' Cup Top 5</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;October 16&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Ladies Classic&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;2. Music Note (3)&lt;br /&gt;3. Careless Jewel (4)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. Icon Project (1)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Acoma&lt;/span&gt; (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It has become rather popular to go against &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; recently but in reality she deserves this #1 slot. Her Beyer was not that impressive in the Lady's Secret but she's never lost a race and she certainly did not look like losing last weekend. She made an earlier move and ended the race as a contest in the upper stretch. It's going to take a real runner to beat her and I don't think anyone can.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I did believe in &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Icon Project&lt;/span&gt; but her latest fitness issues put her firmly on the fence. She realistically may not even make the race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Careless Jewel&lt;/span&gt; has the ideal running style for a possible upset of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt; but then again we've never seen an upset so it's really hard to say what might get the Moss filly beaten. Careless Jewel is in fine form though and she will a major pace threat especially since it looks like pace will be scarce.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I added &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; to the list not because I thought she ran a better race than Proviso but because I think she has a better chance of repeating that performance than Proviso. I'm not a fan of Europeans second time off the plane. Especially when they run big first time off the plane. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt; is a horse I loved as a 2yo. I was all over her in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Demoiselle&lt;/span&gt; and she more than justified my confidence. That was a huge performance. Unfortunately she has rarely looked good since. She has won 4 of her last 13 races but has missed the board in 5 of them. Her last two races have been the turning of a page for her. She won the Glens Falls fair and square and now the Spinster on the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;DQ&lt;/span&gt;. Her two &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Polytrack&lt;/span&gt; races have yielded &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Beyers&lt;/span&gt; of 97 and 101. That puts her in the mix and her good current form only adds spice to her intrigue. Maybe &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt; will be the horse I hoped after all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Turf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Dar Re Mi (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Midday (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Forever Together (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Pure Clan (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Girl (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I moved &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Forever Together&lt;/span&gt; off her perch in this division a few weeks back and the decision to do so looks better and better. I'm not going to be hard on her for the loss in the First Lady. It was a soft course and a flat mile. Neither of those play to her preference but it seems clear that the Europeans are probably stronger. Forever Together is definitely the #1 North American Turf filly in my opinion but Dar Re Mi and Midday look pretty scary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dar Re Mi&lt;/span&gt; has been running at the highest levels all year long and it's not much of a stretch to say that she could be as impressive as Ouija Board. She is simply a really phenomenal horse. If she has held her form she's the one to beat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Midday&lt;/span&gt; must be feared even if it's simply because of her stable. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Juddmonte&lt;/span&gt; farms is flying at the moment, much like &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Godolphin&lt;/span&gt;. Even the terrible underachiever Visit nearly took a G-1 race. I know Midday comes from another barn but the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Juddmonte&lt;/span&gt; crew often does very well in the fall. Midday could be a monster.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Pure Clan&lt;/span&gt; looks solid but ordinary while &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl&lt;/span&gt; has it all to prove in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;QE&lt;/span&gt; II this weekend. Really only &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Miss World&lt;/span&gt; look capable of catching my eye in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Keeneland's&lt;/span&gt; main feature. It would take something really special from one of the other fillies to see them included.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Woodbine's E.P. Taylor stakes looks like a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;doozy&lt;/span&gt; with several top notch Europeans coming. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Rainbow View&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Look Here&lt;/span&gt; would certainly be well backed in the Breeders' Cup but because they're getting a preliminary start in North America I'd toss them if they reappear. Europeans do very poorly second time off the plane. What I'd look for instead is any North American that can give these fillies a run for their money. Maybe someone like &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Treat Gently&lt;/span&gt; for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Juddmonte&lt;/span&gt; and Bobby Frankel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One filly I would not touch with a ten foot pole is &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Magical Fantasy&lt;/span&gt;. She has fraud written all over her. I expect her to be well and truly crushed in the Breeders' Cup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Sprint&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Informed Decision (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Indian Blessing (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Sara Louise (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Carlsbad (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is little doubt in my mind that I have the right 5 horses in my top 5. What I struggle with is the precise order that they should be ranked. I decided to leave them be because on accomplishments I think this is an accurate ranking. But workouts, current fitness, pace and post position will decide the proper order for these fillies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Informed Decision&lt;/span&gt; looked beaten at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;TCA&lt;/span&gt; but she's just relentless on synthetic surfaces and she got to Carlsbad just like she got to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; earlier this spring. I'm not sure that even &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; could handle her but I think freshness may be a factor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Carlsbad&lt;/span&gt; ran her heart out and she nearly got it done. She should have lots of confidence going into the Breeders' Cup because she definitely proved that she can  mix it with the best. Don't be surprised if she's very tough to catch going back home to Santa Anita.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Juvenile Fillies&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Always a Princess (new)&lt;br /&gt;2. She Be Wild (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Blind Luck (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Awesome Maria (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Beautician (1)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; Midst (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It took a while for this division to really take shape, it usually does but this year it seemed to take an especially long time. The Oak Leaf, Alcibiades and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Frizette&lt;/span&gt; should be the key determining races. I think the quality we saw in those events ensures that the winner won't likely be coming from some maiden or allowance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was completely impressed with &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Always a Princess&lt;/span&gt; in the Oak Leaf. She was taken out of her game when given the inside post and she responded well to the adversity. I know she eventually succumbed to Blind Luck but I think she'll definitely be the better horse when it counts. With more experience and a better pace setup the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Baffert&lt;/span&gt; filly looks like one of the best picks of the entire Breeders' Cup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;She Be Wild&lt;/span&gt; looked a shade unlucky in the Alcibiades. I thought the quality of the race was good and the winner, Negligee, looks like a decent sort. But I still think &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;Catalano's&lt;/span&gt; filly is the better of the two. She moved a little sooner and that maybe told on her late. One thing I always shy away from is big upset winners in their very next start. Few of them are able to turn the trick twice in a row. It's better to stick with the established quality and She Be Wild is definitely the established quality.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Blind Luck&lt;/span&gt; will likely be the favorite for the Juvenile Fillies and she deserves it. She's the best closer in the race and everyone else will be praying that the pace is not too quick up front because if it is she'll roll on by this field. I worry that she might not be versatile enough to catch a good stalker though and that's why I have her placed in third. Both Always a Princess and She Be Wild have better tactical speed and very similar talent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Awesome Maria&lt;/span&gt; didn't win the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;Frizette&lt;/span&gt; but I think she is the highest quality horse to come out of it. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Pletcher's&lt;/span&gt; Devil May Care is undefeated but I thought Awesome Maria  had the tougher trip and was unlucky to miss out. I know this means that I've got the three second place finishers from the major preps in my top 5 while only one of the winners made it but I really think that Always a Princess, She Be Wild and Awesome Maria are a much better group than Blind Luck, Negligee and Devil May Care. Awesome Maria is no sure thing to actually contest the Breeders' Cup but I'm hoping that connections send her. She deserves it in my opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Beautician&lt;/span&gt; fell from my number 1 spot all the way to 5&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;. She's lucky that she stayed on the list at all. I'm willing to give her another shot because she really did have all kinds of trouble. She seemed to get over the track okay it was just the traffic she encountered that disadvantaged her. I still prefer her chances over the rest of this crop that has gone unmentioned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-2678063780811503202?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/2678063780811503202/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=2678063780811503202' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/2678063780811503202'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/2678063780811503202'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/breeders-cup-top-5_16.html' title='Breeders&apos; Cup Top 5'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-8313648816182738549</id><published>2009-10-07T12:55:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T13:17:39.241-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Random'/><title type='text'>Time To Give Thanks</title><content type='html'>For anyone wondering why this space is not featuring anything new for the next week. I am headed out of town for yet another vacation. This is my third vacation of the year and when Christmas rolls around I'll enjoy number four. I should probably do some work one of these days!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm disappointed to miss many of the nice races that are going to be happening over the next week but the wonderful thing about the internet is that I can simply watch them all when I get back.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Happy Thanksgiving to all on my side of the border. To those who don't celebrate this holiday in October you can be thankful anyway for all the great races and exciting match-ups you'll see.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-8313648816182738549?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/8313648816182738549/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=8313648816182738549' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8313648816182738549'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8313648816182738549'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/time-to-give-thanks.html' title='Time To Give Thanks'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-4381060493998533711</id><published>2009-10-07T11:04:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T11:05:06.223-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Top 10 2009'/><title type='text'>Breeders' Cup Top 5</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;October 7&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Classic&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Rail Trip (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Rip Van Winkle (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Einstein (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Summer Bird (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped: &lt;/span&gt;Parading (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Summer Bird&lt;/span&gt; struck a blow for the east coast horses in the Jockey Club Gold Cup but my bias is still with Europe and the west. A good performance by any number of horses in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Goodwood&lt;/span&gt; will see them usurp the son of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Birdstone&lt;/span&gt; and oust him from my list once again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Parading&lt;/span&gt; is chief among those I'm eager to see in action in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Goodwood&lt;/span&gt; but of course &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Richard's Kid&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Tiago&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Colonel John&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mine That Bird&lt;/span&gt; could all end up being major players. I don't have a fully formed opinion about the relative merits of all those horses yet. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Goodwood&lt;/span&gt; should iron them out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Ballydoyle&lt;/span&gt; pair of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Rip Van Winkle&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; still look very tough. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt; had a prep over the synthetic track at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Dundalk&lt;/span&gt; and he looked pretty impressive. I still think Rip Van Winkle is the stronger of the two though. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Rail Trip&lt;/span&gt; is the only American that I can see giving those two a real run for their money. Rail Trip has that something extra special and if he ever runs again like he did in the Hollywood Gold Cup the rest will be in big trouble. Obviously since I have him ranked first I am expecting a repeat of that performance. I think he'll be nice and fresh and ready to roll.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For those wondering I am still operating under the assumption that Sea The Stars is not coming. It's a great shame but I just don't think his trainer will want to and his owner has said that it is 100% the trainers choice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is an interesting case for the Classic but I'm not going to be taking that bait. I still honestly believe that this horse is a world class miler but he's only the best of the rest at distances beyond. It's unfortunate that there isn't enough prestige at a mile in North America. To be champion turf horse you have to win the longer races. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; is a stakes winner on Santa Anita's main track but that was in the one mile Sir Beaufort. He could only manage 5&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; in the 9f &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Strub&lt;/span&gt;. He was facing pretty ordinary horses that day. The winner of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Strub&lt;/span&gt;, Cowboy Cal, has already been pointed elsewhere after it was clear that he wasn't Classic material. I don't think this is the best race for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;. He could beat &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt; in the Mile but instead he'll finish mid-pack in the Classic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Turf&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Fame And Glory (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Spanish Moon (3)&lt;br /&gt;3. Conduit (2)&lt;br /&gt;4. Kite Wood (5)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Presious&lt;/span&gt; Passion (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (4)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This race is in real danger of falling apart. Some British bookmakers removed &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Fame and Glory &lt;/span&gt;from the betting for the BC Turf which is a good indication that he's not coming, but who is? &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is now headed to the Classic and America hardly has any horses that could be viewed as realistic contenders. I've left Fame and Glory at the head of my list because I want to hear the final word from his connections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Spanish Moon&lt;/span&gt; has been moved ahead of the defending champion because I was less than impressed with &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Conduit&lt;/span&gt; in the Arc. I know the Arc is a very tough race and finishing 4&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; is a good result but he is so reliant on the pace it makes him tough to back. Last year the field fell into his lap. This year the pace might be different and Spanish Moon is better equipped to handle a variety of pace scenario's. Spanish Moon has the tactical speed to sit anywhere including in front of the whole field. He is on a good run of form and he could be the fresher of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Stoute&lt;/span&gt; pair. Realistically I have struggled to support Conduit wholeheartedly all year long. Maybe I'm unduly biased against him and this is just the latest alternative I've found. For some reason I can't fully describe I just don't trust Conduit and see him as a horse that will hit the board but not win.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Godolphin&lt;/span&gt; have been silent on &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Kite Wood&lt;/span&gt; but that partially because no one has asked. I think he's got a good chance if he comes. The one worry with him might be the ground. They have hesitated to put him on real jarring ground&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've thrown &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Presious&lt;/span&gt; Passion&lt;/span&gt; back on the list because he offers something that others don't. His style is something the Europeans won't have dealt with. Generally when a horse distances themselves from the field they come crashing back to earth but this horse doesn't. He makes you come and get him and because of the size of the margin he opens up he makes a lot of riders jump the gun. I truly don't believe that any American I've seen thus far can win this race but now that the European challenge is falling apart a bit I simply have to give &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;Presious&lt;/span&gt; Passion a look. I expect him to win the Clement Hirsch because the rest of the distance horses in California are terrible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don't expect anyone coming out of the horrendous Joe Hirsch Turf Classic to even compete let alone impact the BC Turf.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Mile&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Delegator&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;Ferneley&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (5)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;Zacinto&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35"&gt;Whatsthescript&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;" class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;Ghanaati&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt; (3), &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;" class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;Aqlaam&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt; (4)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The loss by &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; hardly put me off at all. I actually like to see a bit of a reverse like that. She had to deal with adverse conditions and it probably means that her connections will be extra careful with their prep work now. Some times when a horse is on a real roll connections don't want to change anything but a loss can bring new focus.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt; was rushed up to contest a fast pace in a 7f race. She ended up third by 3/4 of a length but it was the pace that did her in. It actually looked like an excellent blowout. She is a stronger candidate to win the Mile now than she was.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40"&gt;Delegator&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; looks to be backing into this race a bit. I have him above &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41"&gt;Zacinto&lt;/span&gt; because he is a more accomplished horse overall but &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42"&gt;Zacinto&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; looks like he's heating up towards the end of his campaign while &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43"&gt;Delegator&lt;/span&gt; is just trying to maintain form. This order could easily switch up as we hear more rumblings from the two camps. Another reason I have &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44"&gt;Godolphin's&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45"&gt;Delegator&lt;/span&gt; above is that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_46"&gt;Zacinto&lt;/span&gt; has not been officially confirmed for this race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_47"&gt;Ferneley&lt;/span&gt; looks like the best of an ordinary lot of Americans but I'm really banking on a "stranger" or new shooter to come to the fore in the Oak Tree Mile or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_48"&gt;Shadwell&lt;/span&gt; Mile this weekend. Horses like &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_49"&gt;Justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Court Vision&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mr. Sidney&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Battle of Hastings&lt;/span&gt; will compete at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_50"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; and hopefully one of them marks themselves as a real miler. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Cowboy Cal&lt;/span&gt; has chosen to go out west which I actually prefer because it gives him a run over the course. He is undefeated at the distance and definitely has a big chance to make the ranking. I chose &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_51"&gt;Whatsthescript&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; because he is, as of now, the most proven miler of the group. He ran third in the BC Mile race last year and although he's had a rough campaign of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_52"&gt;under performance&lt;/span&gt; he could get right back in the thick of things with a win at Oak Tree. I think he was likely not fully cranked for his seasonal debut then his next two races came at 9f so I'll excuse him for not excelling in those events.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the most important things I look for in a miler is that they're better at a mile on turf than they are at all other distances or conditions. If a horse has been really great at other things it makes him a less than likely miler but some of the really good ones, like War Chant, prove that they can be even better at a mile. That's what I'm hoping to see from someone in one of the two big mile preps.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mr. Sidney&lt;/span&gt; is the one exception from the group above because he has already shown that he's a real miler. My problem with him is that he has never appeared to be brilliant. I wonder if he has only been beating poor horses in slow times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Realistically I could have put any one of the main contenders for the Oak Tree Mile or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_53"&gt;Shadwell&lt;/span&gt; Mile in the last spot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sprint&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Fatal Bullet (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_54"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_55"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;4. Hollywood Hit (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_56"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_57"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (3), &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_58"&gt;Ready's&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Echo (4), Noble Court (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I made some pretty big changes to my sprint ranking. I still have Fatal Bullet on top but his status as my #1 Sprint choice is contingent upon a good race in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_59"&gt;Keeneland's&lt;/span&gt; Phoenix Stakes. We'll find out on Friday if he still has the flash and dash. I expect that he does.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_60"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_61"&gt;Ready's&lt;/span&gt; Echo&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Noble Court&lt;/span&gt; are all likely going to be non-runners in this race so I had to fix my sights elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fatal Bullet and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_62"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; have one thing in common. They're really fast early on and if you add the blazing new shooter Hollywood Hit to the mix as well as the normal chaff the BC Sprint may set up for a closer. The best closer I see out there is &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_63"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;. I think &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_64"&gt;Asmussen&lt;/span&gt; really gets the best out of this horse and in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_65"&gt;Vosburgh&lt;/span&gt; he showed that he could come and get a world class sprinter at 6f. That had always been my main concern with him. He looked more like a 7f horse than a 6f one. But any horse that can gun down Fabulous Strike at 6f on the dirt has my respect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Hollywood Hit&lt;/span&gt; is a horse that probably very few people have heard of. He's the newest sprint sensation to come out of Canada. He's not actually Canadian at all, he's an Oklahoma bred that started his career on the minor circuit's in the south. In his first 6 career races he went 6-2-2-0, he won an allowance earning a 100 Beyer and he also ran second to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_66"&gt;Kensei&lt;/span&gt; at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_67"&gt;Oaklawn&lt;/span&gt;. But everything changed for the better when he came to Woodbine. He has run three straight blistering races in a row earning figures of 108, 104 and 96. In his last effort, the King Corrie Stakes, he set fractions of :21.81 and :43.68 en route to a 5 1/2 length win in 1:07.38. He goes to the front and keeps getting stronger. He is still a 3yo that has not tried graded stakes company but he is undefeated on synthetics and the only horse to beat him since he broke his maiden is &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_68"&gt;Kensei&lt;/span&gt;. Two races back he destroyed El &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_69"&gt;Brujo&lt;/span&gt; who then came back to win the KY Cup Sprint. Although he hasn't run in any big races yet his form and the figures both suggest that this &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_70"&gt;speedball&lt;/span&gt; is a major player. His record looks very similar to Fatal Bullet's last year. Mark down the name and keep your eye out. Only &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_71"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; and Fatal Bullet have earned higher synthetic sprinting figures this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_72"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; never struck me as a 6f purist kind of horse but he is actually 3 for 3 at the distance and I have always thought that he's better on synthetics than he is on the dirt. He is running in the Ancient Title this weekend and since the field is weak he'll likely win or be very close. I like that he can come from off the pace and even that he is good going longer. Some of the best sprinters are those than can handle 6f but they're also proficient at longer distances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Juvenile&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_73"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_74"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (4)&lt;br /&gt;3. Dave in Dixie (5)&lt;br /&gt;4. Dublin (2)&lt;br /&gt;5. Aspire (3)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No changes to the juvenile rankings in terms of the horses included but the order did get shuffled around a bit. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_75"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky&lt;/span&gt; is the #1 horse in this division and he could easily be one of the shortest prices on the day. None of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_76"&gt;Californian's&lt;/span&gt; seem to be able to handle him and every horse that is coming in from out of town will have questions hanging over them regarding the surface. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_77"&gt;Baffert&lt;/span&gt; looks set to have a very strong Breeders' Cup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I got on board with &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_78"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; after his massive maiden victory. He looked immense when stretching out, then he confirmed that form with a slightly troubled second place finish behind  &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_79"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky in the Norfolk. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_80"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt; did not have the cleanest of trips in the Norfolk but he looked good when he got a clear run. He was giving away a good amount of experience to the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_81"&gt;Baffert&lt;/span&gt; horse and maybe he comes on a bit from this effort. He would seem like the most likely horse to run down &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_82"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky if indeed that is possible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dave in Dixie&lt;/span&gt; was even more inexperienced than &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_83"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt;. All he had under his belt going into the Norfolk was one start in a sprint maiden. He ran like he didn't know that other horses could be that good. His maiden win was so easy but the horses in the Norfolk didn't really come back to him. He closed well to finish 6&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_84"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;, just two noses out of third. But the experience he gained is worth a ton. Dave in Dixie ought to be a very nice horse and we should see more from him in the Juvenile.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm not as thrilled about the chances of east coast horses. I think the Californians will set the standard in the Juvenile but I don't want to completely ignore the good horses in the east. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dublin &lt;/span&gt;and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Aspire&lt;/span&gt; both look like good ones. I'm not trilled about neither of them showing up in the Breeders' Futurity. I don't think a synthetic prep is necessary for the horses benefit but for those of us making predictions it's a whole lot easier to get behind a horse once you have a bit of an indication of how they'll like the track. Aspire is a hard closing horse who should love synthetics. He's got a big chance. Dublin already has the big reputation and he'll have his hands full at Belmont but any Lukas horse that comes through his early program to win a G-1 at this stage has to be respected. Lukas may be hard on his juveniles but at least you know the good ones are for real.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most likely after the dust settles this week I'll be giving preference to the good horses that are coming from the Breeders' Futurity rather than the Champagne but no horse in the Breeders' Futurity looks particularly impressive at this time. Perhaps &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_85"&gt;Aikenite&lt;/span&gt;, Backtalk or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_86"&gt;Hockley&lt;/span&gt; will fit the mold but it's just as likely that an unknown will win this race, or make the most favorable impression. For now we wait.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-4381060493998533711?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/4381060493998533711/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=4381060493998533711' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4381060493998533711'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4381060493998533711'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/breeders-cup-top-5.html' title='Breeders&apos; Cup Top 5'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-8738212456351855067</id><published>2009-10-06T09:55:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-06T10:23:25.456-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Commentary'/><title type='text'>Grading The Graded Stakes</title><content type='html'>It was a major weekend of prep racing but were all preps created equal? We all know the answer to that question. Some races look good on paper before hand but turn out to be slow, some races are turned upside down by the result and some races look like they were already a mini version of the Breeders' Cup. Here is my take on the races we saw this weekend and the impact they might have. The grades and description of the grades are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" &gt;A&lt;/span&gt; (More than one major BC contender was in action)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Oak Leaf&lt;/span&gt; - The California juvenile preps are usually where the eventual BC winners are found when the BC itself is also in California. Always a Princess and Blind Luck look especially good but you also just have to respect any horse that comes out of this race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Norfolk&lt;/span&gt; - It's more than likely that the Juvenile winner was in this race. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky will be hard to deny but even &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt;, Gallant Gent and Dave in Dixie look like the next best things. Not much strength in the east at present.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Morvich&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - If a North American is going to win the Turf Sprint then they're likely coming out of this race. California Flag, Get Funky and Bruce's Dream all ran excellent races and don't forget that Desert Code exited a dull performance in this race last year to score on BC day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" &gt;B&lt;/span&gt; (Either several BC contenders or just one single major contender)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Jockey Club Gold Cup&lt;/span&gt; - Summer Bird, Quality Road and Macho Again may all end up in Breeders' Cup races but given the competition they'll be facing I would not be shocked if the Classic winner was not in this race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Beldame&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - Music Note is a serious racehorse, she did not beat much but she did it well and should have a major impact on the Ladies Classic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Vosburgh&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - For a race with so much talent this is a pretty cruel ranking but Fabulous Strike is ducking out and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt; probably will too. That leaves Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt;, he's the logical horse to run down Fatal Bullet and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; but can anyone run down those two?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" &gt;C&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;(Just one BC contender)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Flower Bowl&lt;/span&gt; - Pure Clan has a moderate shot at hitting the frame in the FM Turf, everyone else is not good enough.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Cotillion&lt;/span&gt; - Careless Jewel is a good horse but the Ladies Classic is ultra tough. She is not a major contender in my mind she's just one of the crowd that needs to be respected.&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" &gt;D&lt;/span&gt; (May produce a few &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;longshot&lt;/span&gt; hopefuls)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Joe Hirsch Turf Classic&lt;/span&gt; - It's a harsh assessment for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; but he's going to the Classic where he will not have a great chance. The rest of this field was junk and should not show up in California.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Indiana Derby&lt;/span&gt; - Misremembered looks like a decent sort, maybe for the Dirt Mile&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Ohio Derby&lt;/span&gt; - Gone Astray put in his second big race performance in a row but will his connections send him?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Hawthorne Gold Cup&lt;/span&gt; - Awesome Gem is a lovable old guy but he's not a major threat to win a championship caliber race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:180%;" &gt;F&lt;/span&gt; (Will have no impact whatsoever on a Breeders' Cup race)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Kelso&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - Three horse field that was taken off the Turf. Not much to add here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Durham Cup&lt;/span&gt; - Woodbine's main track stakes races rarely produce BC contenders. This one is no different.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Cliff Hanger&lt;/span&gt; - Someone might actually be tempted to try the Mile coming out of this race but it probably be a mistake.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-8738212456351855067?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/8738212456351855067/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=8738212456351855067' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8738212456351855067'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8738212456351855067'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/grading-graded-stakes.html' title='Grading The Graded Stakes'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-8785335510060260168</id><published>2009-10-06T07:36:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-06T09:37:50.086-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Review'/><title type='text'>Weekend Review</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Overview:&lt;/span&gt; Other than the massive upset by &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Interpatation&lt;/span&gt; over &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; the week was pretty &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;formful&lt;/span&gt;. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Interpatation&lt;/span&gt; was the only G-1 winner that went off at odds of more than 5/1 and the favorite managed to at least hit the board in every race except the Flower Bowl where &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt; struggled to live up to expectations. Even the four G-2 events were all won by the favorite or second choice. So the good horses starting showing their true colors and it's a good thing because the Breeders' Cup record of horses that have had a poor final prep is pretty weak. I do not often mention overseas racing on this blog despite being quite a fan of it. In the early days I actually followed European racing more than American but for the blog I decided to keep my focus stateside. However I simply cannot let the season of Sea the Stars go unmentioned. Sometime after he is retired I plan on thoroughly reviewing his career and comparing it against those of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Ribot&lt;/span&gt;, Sea Bird, Brigadier Gerard and others to see just how good he was. For now I'll simply say that I am extremely impressed with this colt. His acceleration in the Arc was unbelievable. People speculated that he didn't have that kind of acceleration but as it turns out it seems like he simply never had the occasion to use it. Sea the Stars is a horse for the ages. If you're interested there is an excellent tribute video you can catch on &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SzQef1bMqc"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Youtube&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. There were too many other key races to mention them all by name but Music Note, Summer Bird and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky were probably the most impressive winners. Gone Astray showed very good acceleration to win his second straight minor state Derby. He may use those wins as back door access to the Classic. Out of stakes company there was a very good debut performance from a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Pletcher&lt;/span&gt; horse named Connemara. He completely blew the break in a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Turfway&lt;/span&gt; maiden but he rallied strongly around the whole field on the far turn and kept rolling in the lane to win by 5. This half brother to Lion Heart and French Satin could be a very serious horse.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SP5rQnrVzCCUQ"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Thoroughbred Championship Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Mathematically &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; still had a major chance to catch Rachel Alexandra if he had been able to sweep his final few races. Now that he tasted defeat in the Joe Hirsch that window is all but closed. A win in the Classic would still do it but the Classic is a race he is far less likely to win. The Female Turf division is in a delicate limbo right now. Five horses are within 40 points of each other at the top but with Forever Together and Magical Fantasy still to run in G-1's before the Breeders' Cup the championship may just come down to the two of them. Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; has put himself squarely back into the mix for the Sprint title. He hadn't won a Graded Stakes race since the Carter back in April so he had been slowly falling down the rankings but this win makes him second only to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt;. He needs to head to California though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SO-kKqPTNhMOQ&amp;amp;gid=0"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Power Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky is actually one of the top 10 active horses in the country. It's a pretty rare thing for a 2yo to be ranked this high even before the Breeders' Cup which is obviously a major help to whoever wins it. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky has been phenomenal thus far. Music Note was the other major gainer this week. In just three starts she has captured the biggest sprint race for mares in New York and the biggest route race for mares. Thankfully her opening debacle this season is a distant memory. Her rating of 20.20 makes her joint 12&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; among active horses and a good showing in the Ladies Classic would see her climb further still.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=42159"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Performance of the Week:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I don't often give Performance of the Week to a horse that lost a race but Always a Princess impressed me the most this past weekend. She came into the Oak Leaf with many things against her. She had never been beyond 5 1/2f and now she was going two turns. She had never faced winners but she was being asked to face stakes winners and to top it all off she drew the rail which often spells death to the inexperienced. She broke with the field but had to be asked in order to get to the lead. In her first start she was sitting 10 lengths off the pace early but here she set a pace that was just on the quick side. Sterling Outlook set nearly identical fractions in the Norfolk and he wound up dead last. Always a Princess could not deal with Blind Luck but she did stay on gamely and fight off the challenge of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Bickersons&lt;/span&gt;. With the pace and all other factors being so much against her I thought it was a colossal performance. Always a Princess goes to the head of my Breeders' Cup Juvenile Fillies list. With a better draw, more experience and a different pace scenario she can beat anyone I've seen so far.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=42102"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Race of the Week:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Despite the fact that the finish was not that tight I thought the Jockey Club Gold Cup was the most exciting race to watch. You had to know the context. Summer Bird on a serious roll looking to establish himself as the clear 3yo leader. Quality Road, the talented and brilliant, whose reputation probably outdoes his significant accomplishments. The winner of this match would go into the Breeders' Cup as the top sophomore of their gender. The older horses failed to involve themselves in this race at all it was pretty clear that we were going to see them duke it out as they entered the stretch. For a brief moment it looked like it might get desperate but Summer Bird found something extra and powered a length clear. Quality Road never gave up and performed with much credit but clearly Summer Bird is the better of the two at the distance. I felt like this race was what racing is supposed to be about. Everyone wanted questions answered in head to head fashion and that's what we got.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=42097"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Flop of the Week:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Very few good horses ran badly this weekend so I'm going to have to pick on Get Serious. He was running in the Cliff Hanger at the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Meadowlands&lt;/span&gt;. Get Serious was 4 for 5 this year and he had not finished out of the frame in a Turf race since he faced Big Brown, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Shakis&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Proudinsky&lt;/span&gt; and company at Monmouth. There were no killers in the Cliff Hanger so he was justifiably sent off as the favorite at around 2/1. Unfortunately for his backers and connections he just didn't come to play. He offered no resistance in the stretch and was quickly swallowed up by the pack. He only avoided a last place finish by a nose. Get Serious is a better horse than that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=42099"&gt;Tip &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;O'the&lt;/span&gt; Cap:&lt;/a&gt; I wanted to give my congratulations to Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; and to Steve &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Asmussen&lt;/span&gt; as well for his victory in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Vosburgh&lt;/span&gt;. Indian Blessing gets praised for being a BC Juvenile race winner still in action and winning stakes but once upon a time I actually selected Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; to win the Juvenile. He ran a decent third that day and he's been a solid course all of his career. I think he may actually appreciate the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Asmussen&lt;/span&gt; program a bit more than what Jones was doing with him. Under &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Asmussen&lt;/span&gt; he is 6 for 11 and has never really run a dull race. With Jones he was 4 for 11 and often times he just didn't look like a horse that was really trying.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/weekend-picks-and-analysis.html"&gt;KC Handicapping:&lt;/a&gt; This will be the last installment of the Kennedy's Corridor Handicapping roundup. I have decided that I am no longer comfortable giving out advice that I know will lose you money over the long term. Not that I believe that anyone follows my suggestions blindly but in life away from cyberspace I spend a good bit of time investing in the lives of people that have come from or are in difficult life situations. I got to thinking, is the handicapping advice I give something I'd want them reading?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All things considered I think I do decently with my selections compared to other people. It's hard to turn a profit when making selections for a race a day or two in advance. Most people that offer these types of picks don't keep score because it's extremely difficult to show a profit. My handicapping tips have been good for a loss of 11% over a period of a couple years. I work in the finance sector and I couldn't in good conscience give this kind of advice at work so I'm choosing not to give it in my spare time either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does this mean I'll never handicap another race? I've always enjoyed the challenge of finding winners but I am not a gambler. I'm going to have opinions about certain races, especially big races but I'm not going to approach them with the thought of value or turning a profit. I enjoy racing primarily as a fan and in the future I'm going to be focusing this blog more on being a fan than a handicapper.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky, Summer Bird and Music Note were all short priced winners so it was another negative week. Going against &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; was the correct move but I came up with the wrong horse in Telling. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Interpatation&lt;/span&gt; is one that I never would have selected, a horse with a profile like that is simply always going to beat me. I was a bit shocked that Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; got to Fabulous Strike. I thought the Strike would have more than enough to hold him off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Weekly Record: 9(7)-3-1-0 (-$7.40 -41.11% ROI)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Overall Record: 813(463)-141-128-102 (-$181.90 -11.19% ROI)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-8785335510060260168?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/8785335510060260168/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=8785335510060260168' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8785335510060260168'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8785335510060260168'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/weekend-review.html' title='Weekend Review'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-6546069095888131296</id><published>2009-10-02T14:17:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-05T08:05:57.347-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Kennedy Speed Ratings'/><title type='text'>KSR's This Weekend</title><content type='html'>Here are some of the Kennedy Speed Ratings for the cards at Belmont on Saturday and Oak Tree on Sunday. Make of these figures what you will. They are still very much in the test phase but I thought some people might be interested in seeing how the tests are going.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just as a reminder, the basic premise of these figures is that any horse with a rating of 100 or more is considered fast enough to win this particular event. In my database of races calculated it looks like the horses with a 100+ rating win about 70% of the time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;iframe width='500' height='1000' frameborder='0' src='http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tBETdFP2024ipVw8fEuH_Sw&amp;single=true&amp;gid=7&amp;output=html&amp;widget=true'&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;iframe width='500' height='1000' frameborder='0' src='http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tBETdFP2024ipVw8fEuH_Sw&amp;single=true&amp;gid=8&amp;output=html&amp;widget=true'&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-6546069095888131296?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/6546069095888131296/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=6546069095888131296' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/6546069095888131296'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/6546069095888131296'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/ksrs-this-weekend.html' title='KSR&apos;s This Weekend'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-1197321071562765861</id><published>2009-10-02T10:41:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-02T12:20:19.391-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Handicapping'/><title type='text'>Weekend Picks And Analysis</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Beldame&lt;/span&gt; Stakes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don't trust any horse in this race. Music Note was fantastic last season but has been hit and miss this year. I do suspect though that her first race of the season came at a time when the stable was out of form and she just wasn't ready. She surprised me with her effectiveness at 7f in the Ballerina. She probably wins this over a lackluster field. Unbridled Belle has the right credentials if she's feeling up to it on the day but she has just become more inconsistent as time has gone on. Music Note in a yawner at 1/5.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Music Note&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Vosburgh&lt;/span&gt; Stakes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This race is not unlike the Tom Fool Handicap that was run in July. That was supposed to be the big showdown between Fabulous Strike and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt; but the Strike backed out on race day. His connections seemingly lacked the courage to face &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt;. Which is odd because Fabulous Strike would have been favored there just as he will be here. But I do think that the conditions are better for the Strike here because this is a 6f race. 7f favors &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt; but 6f is the specialty of Fabulous Strike. Go Go Shoot and Kodiak &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Kowboy&lt;/span&gt; are a good supporting cast but I think they're in for third money. I think that two factors are very important, Go Go Shoot and the weather. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt; will not win this race without a big pace pushing effort from Go Go Shoot and a dry track. The former seems like something you can count on. The latter is definitely up in the air (no pun intended). My feeling is that the track will be wet and Fabulous Strike will defeat &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt;. But &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt;, should he be given the chance, has a much better claim for victory in the BC Sprint. Fabulous Strike is in a unique class as a sprinter. He has shown that he can take unbelievable pressure at 6f and still run to the line. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; is not a member of his class, not yet at least. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt; can definitely be that good but I think a wet track deprives him of that explosive kick he's got.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fabulous Strike&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Flower Bowl Invitational&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is an exciting contest and a good chance to get away from chalky picks in short fields. My own figures say that the race comes down to Pure Clan and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Carribean&lt;/span&gt; Sunset but I really don't think it's that simple. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Leamington&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Moneycantbuymelove&lt;/span&gt; all have big chances. I won't quickly forget the race &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Rosinka&lt;/span&gt; ran in the 07' Flower Bowl for Graham Motion. Like &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Leamington&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Rosinka&lt;/span&gt; was a tough front runner in the form of her life. Her campaign gained traction at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt;, she had a couple of early summer starts and then was &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;layed&lt;/span&gt; off until the end of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt; where she took a stakes race. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Leamington&lt;/span&gt; has had a very similar buildup to this race and Motion is very dangerous in the fall months. Her speed figures look a touch shy of the best but if she improves on her last, which I think she is set to do she can win this race. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt; has to be heavily respected as well and I think she's actually the horse to beat. Belmont, like Arlington, is a nice deep course which seems to suit her perfectly. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt; is also a qualifier on a new angle I'm working on. I know I haven't ever really looked at pedigree but after &lt;a href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/just-enough-pedigree.html"&gt;my post last week&lt;/a&gt; I got to thinking about ways to catch well bred talented horses. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt; is a horse I'm going to refer to as a "Blue Blood" and I'm interested to see how she does not only here but in every subsequent start. From a pace perspective Pure Clan and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Carribean&lt;/span&gt; Sunset will be hoping that Criticism and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Leamington&lt;/span&gt; lock horns but I really don't see a duel developing. I think Criticism takes back and is never heard from again while &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Leamington&lt;/span&gt; has things her own way. Pure Clan and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Carribean&lt;/span&gt; Sunset may be chasing in vain in the final furlong. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Moneycantbuymelove&lt;/span&gt; is a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;wildcard&lt;/span&gt;. I think she has only shown form good enough once but it was in her last race so it's not exactly intelligent to pass her off. I don't feel strongly about her but I fear her so she gets on the ticket.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Leamington&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;Moneycantbuymelove&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Joe Hirsch Turf Classic Invitational&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This race is an invitational which to me begs the question - How on earth did &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;Ready's&lt;/span&gt; Echo and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35"&gt;Interpatation&lt;/span&gt; get invited? I suppose I'll be red faced if either of them win but they look totally out of their element here. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; is the class and the ground looks to be coming together for Grand Couturier. But I can see both of them getting beat. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; is my favorite horse in training and it's been a great year to follow him but he always did look like a horse with stamina issues. Is 12f too far? I guess we'll find out. He ought to be heavily favored in this race because he is the most likely winner but seeing his stamina give out would not be a great surprise to me. Grand Couturier is rounding into his best form just like he was last year he'll be a huge danger to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; but I think the best value play here is Telling. His last race shocked me but a repeat wouldn't. I think he's come into the best form of his life and 12f is perfect for him. I think he and the other two I've been mentioning will settle this but of course Telling will be far and away the best price.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Telling&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Jockey Club Gold Cup Stakes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Once again and perhaps to my peril I'm going to go against Macho Again. I see his merits but I think the three year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42"&gt;olds&lt;/span&gt; are better horses. Summer Bird is the new &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43"&gt;Curlin&lt;/span&gt;, he's getting stronger and stronger as the year goes on both physically and with his results. I think the likely off track here helps him defeat the other really talented horse in here, Quality Road. I still think that Quality Road will be the more brilliant horse but 9f is probably better for him and a wet track is a real question mark in my mind. These two are the fastest in the race and other than maybe thinking about a price on Dry Martini underneath I'd just use the sophomores. I think Summer Bird powers home once again over a much more stubborn Quality Road.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Summer Bird&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Oak Leaf Stakes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think it's probably best to go against Baffert's hot pot Always a Princess. Sure she made a great debut but many juveniles regress off of their first performance and she's drawn the rail in here. I'm not a big fan of taking inexperienced horses on the rail. Of course that bias blew up in my face when Hot Dixie Chick romped at the Spa but I'm willing to take my chances that Always a Princess is not another Hot Dixie Chick. I'm going to focus on Blind Luck and Softly Singing. Blind Luck has only lost once in three starts and that was in a G-1 to Mi Sueno. That's as good a resume as you'll find right now. My one worry with her is that she seemed to hang a bit in her last, or maybe she just had problems closing with a rush against horses that were also closing out the race pretty well. Either way it made for a less than stirring visual impression. Blind Luck is the class in my opinion but she's no slam dunk. I was very impressed with the maiden win by Softly Singing. She was aggressive but still reserved, she moved powerfully when asked and seemed very focused and professional. I suspect that she came out of that race with a fair bit of fizz and ginger because Hollendorfer has put her through 5 timed workouts since her last race just a month ago! I think this filly is as sharp as a razor and I expect a very big effort from her.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Softly Singing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Norfolk Stakes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I tried really hard to find a reason to oppose Lookin At Lucky. I tried Gallant Gent, Dave in Dixie and Pulsion on for size but none of them quite fit what I'm looking for in an upsetter. Lookin At Lucky is likely just the best horse and he's supposed to win this race. But watch for the horses that run well behind him. There could be some real BC Juvenile potential among the others. Lucky does not have me convinced that he's championship quality yet but he is more than good enough to win the Norfolk.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lookin At Lucky&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-1197321071562765861?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/1197321071562765861/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=1197321071562765861' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/1197321071562765861'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/1197321071562765861'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/weekend-picks-and-analysis.html' title='Weekend Picks And Analysis'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-5961095795914027023</id><published>2009-10-01T10:01:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-01T10:48:38.871-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Commentary'/><title type='text'>Rating Performance Rates</title><content type='html'>I'm expecting the entries to be drawn for Belmont's Saturday card any time now but while we wait to get a glance at the Past Performances I thought I'd fill up my time by posing a question that has perplexed me for many months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just what is the point of "Performance Rates"?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most people have no idea what I'm talking about because despite the fact that &lt;a href="http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/racing/performance-rates.aspx"&gt;Performance Rates&lt;/a&gt; have been around for a few years they get very little publicity. Thoroughbred Times actually features a link to them on their main page. Which you'd think would be exposure enough to have them more widely known. They were also developed by the Jockey Club, you have to think there is some clout there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The basic premise of &lt;a href="http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/racing/performance-rates.aspx"&gt;Performance Rates&lt;/a&gt; is clearly stated in the paragraph below that can be found by visiting &lt;a href="http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/default.aspx"&gt;Thoroughbred Times&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"Performance Rates are an objective measurement of racetrack performance developed by the  Jockey Club Information Systems. Performance Rates assign a rate to horses based upon  beaten lengths - who beat whom and by how much - with some adjustments made to standardize  beaten distances to account for horses that are not pressed or eased in large fields.  Time is not a factor in Performance Rates, which are based on every start by every horse  in North America. Performance Rates are expressed in lengths around a theoretical mean of  zero. The average Performance Rates of the best horses in a given year are generally  about 30 lengths better than an average performance of the average horse."  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: left;"&gt;Sounds good, a system created to tell us how much better certain horses are than the average, but what do Performance Rates look like in reality. Here are the current standings for 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Overall Top 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rachel Alexandra - 39.33&lt;br /&gt;Icon Project - 32.03&lt;br /&gt;Mine That Bird - 31.14&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Fantasy - 31.06&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt; - 30.97&lt;br /&gt;Dunkirk - 30.57&lt;br /&gt;Quality Road - 30.54&lt;br /&gt;Old Fashioned - 29.89&lt;br /&gt;Musket Man - 29.81&lt;br /&gt;Summer Bird - 29.30&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Top 5 Older Males&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Unbridled's&lt;/span&gt; Heart - 25.72&lt;br /&gt;To Tell The Truth - 25.01&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Tizway&lt;/span&gt; - 23.60&lt;br /&gt;Macho Again - 23.30&lt;br /&gt;Jen's Revenge - 23.26&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Top 5 Turf Horses&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Take the Points - 23.96&lt;br /&gt;Better Talk Now - 22.72&lt;br /&gt;Grand Couturier - 22.44&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; - 22.07&lt;br /&gt;Brass Hat - 21.97&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I could go on listing all the divisions but if you know anything about horse racing then you're probably asking the same question as me. Why do rankings this horrendous even exist and furthermore why does a major racing publication promote them?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are talking about a system so useful that even it's creators make no mention of it on their own website &lt;a href="http://www.tjcis.com/default.asp"&gt;(Jockey Club Information Systems)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm sure the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Darley&lt;/span&gt; Stable would be thrilled to learn that they in fact have the best older horse in the nation! &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Unbridled's&lt;/span&gt; Heart is win-less in three allowance starts this year but apparently that's all it takes. Maybe this will encourage them to retire him, you know, now that he has nothing left to prove.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I actually tried to reverse engineer these numbers to come up with an explanation for the erroneous results. No luck, these numbers seem to have little rhyme or reason.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of you will know that I actually do support the creation of point systems that help us quantify racing. I think it's a major hole in our industry. We can't easily point to any guide that allows us to quickly get a feel for the major players in each division. Performance Rates, however, are not the answer to this dilemma and they get an "F" and they should also be removed from cyberspace immediately.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The more you look at them the more you realize why no one else has ever mentioned them. Some things are best forgotten. In fact I apologize for bringing them to your attention.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-5961095795914027023?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/5961095795914027023/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=5961095795914027023' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/5961095795914027023'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/5961095795914027023'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/10/rating-performance-rates.html' title='Rating Performance Rates'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-4631694722549896430</id><published>2009-09-30T07:36:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-30T09:15:15.207-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Top 10 2009'/><title type='text'>Breeders' Cup Top 5</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;September 30&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Ladies Classic&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Icon Project (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Music Note (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Careless Jewel (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Acoma&lt;/span&gt; (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's the calm before the storm in the Ladies Classic division. All five of the mares should be in action over the next two weeks although probably few of them will face each other. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt; will go to the Lady's Secret, Careless Jewel to the Cotillion, Music Note will take on the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Beldame&lt;/span&gt; and I fully expect to see &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Acoma&lt;/span&gt; in the Spinster. Icon Project is the undecided wild card. She will either go in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Beldame&lt;/span&gt; or the Spinster and if she is to retain that #1 ranking she probably shouldn't lose either race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Beldame&lt;/span&gt; makes sense because &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Icon Project&lt;/span&gt; has already performed very well there but connections will be curious about her synthetic track form so the Spinster is a draw as well. One caution I would make is that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Keeneland's&lt;/span&gt; form has not necessarily held up in California. They are very different surfaces despite both being synthetic. You'll see a lot more turf horses having success at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; than you will at Santa Anita. The good news for Icon Project is that she's already proven she can handle turf and dirt. She is better on the dirt but turf has not been a problem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Zenyatta's&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; inactivity has created a scenario where people are actually forgetting that she's quite a mare. The close call in her last start only added fuel to the fire. But make no mistake &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt; is still a running machine. It would take a lifetime best effort from any of these fillies to beat her.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;European &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Rainbow View&lt;/span&gt; does enter my thinking for this race but at this point I'm not willing to accept that she is automatically as good as the rest of these. Being European does not entitle her to some higher level of performance. I think many Europeans will be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;overbet&lt;/span&gt; this year because people are like sheep. They're going to chase the perception that Turf horses and Europeans specifically have a major advantage. As always it should be evaluated on a case by case basis. In Rainbow View's case were looking at a horse that has mostly underachieved after a scintillating juvenile campaign. The surface switch might help wake her up but I have legitimate questions about how good she really is.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Turf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Dar Re Mi (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Midday (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Forever Together (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Pure Clan (5)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Girl (4)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I didn't make any major changes to the rankings this week other than flip flopping Pure Clan and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl. The reason I did so is because of the news that &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl&lt;/span&gt; is headed to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; for the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;QE&lt;/span&gt; II instead of staying at Belmont for the Flower Bowl. I would have much preferred to see her against older horses prior to the Breeders' Cup. I also like the timing of the Flower Bowl better. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;QE&lt;/span&gt; II Challenge Cup is three weeks before the Breeders' Cup whereas the Flower Bowl gives you five weeks. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Pure Clan&lt;/span&gt; incidentally will be in the Flower Bowl and if it comes up firm she should have a big shot. She's not the kind of filly that I expect to see in the winners circle regularly. She just has to run well to show that she's in good form.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Forever Together&lt;/span&gt; is not ranked in third because of her failing in Canada. I had actually moved her to third prior to that race and I expected a sub par performance on a track that she just doesn't handle as well. Some just thought it was the ground that did her in last year so they're puzzled as to why she didn't win on firmer ground this year. I always suspected that it was the one turn configuration she didn't like. In two turn races on the grass she is 5-5-0-0 with an average Beyer of 102.8. Around one turn she is 5-1-2-2 with and average Beyer of 95.8. Her only win around one turn on the grass was in a listed stakes at Arlington. You should see Forever Together back in form at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I do, however, think that &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dar Re Mi&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Midday&lt;/span&gt; might be better horses than Forever Together. Defending her crown against these Europeans might be extremely tough.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Sprint&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Informed Decision (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Indian Blessing (4)&lt;br /&gt;4. Sara Louise (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. Carlsbad (3)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; Game Face (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was personally quite thrilled with the Gallant Bloom and despite the fact that it's in vogue to doubt &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Indian Blessing&lt;/span&gt; on synthetics I'm going to step up and say that she has a real shot here. Indian Blessing had been favored in everyone of her lifetime starts until the Gallant Bloom where she was 1.40/1 to Sara Louise's 1.35/1. Indian Blessing has never been longer odds than 1.80/1. It's pretty incredible really. But at this years Filly and Mare Sprint you're going to see 5/1 or higher on her. That represents great value on a horse that has missed a grand total of one &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;exacta&lt;/span&gt; placing in her entire career.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She did have that terrible race at Hollywood, which is why the doubters abound but it was her first race back from Dubai. Those comeback efforts are often below par. It was also run over Hollywood's brand of synthetic which of course does differ from Santa Anita's. At Santa Anita she is actually 3-2-1-0. Her only loss came to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; in last year's event when the pace was very sharp. Indian Blessing is a major threat to win this race and she may be the best value of her life.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've dropped &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Game Face&lt;/span&gt; from my top 5 not through any fault of her own but due to the fact that &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Sara Louise&lt;/span&gt; and the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Godolphin&lt;/span&gt; stable as a whole have really come on this fall. They also have &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Seventh Street &lt;/span&gt;for this race but I'm not as big a fan of hers. I'm not sure that she has the stuff to dig out a win when she needs to. Sara Louise is a horse that really impressed me last year. In fact I picked her to beat Rachel Alexandra in the Golden Rod because her move in the Pocahontas was so explosive. At the time I thought she was the filly that was destined for greatness. She has done little wrong as a 3yo. Although she hasn't tried synthetics she looks like a good fit for them. She definitely has the potential to upset &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; and Informed Decision who have looked nearly invincible for so long.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Juvenile Fillies&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Beautician (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. She Be Wild (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Blind Luck (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Awesome Maria (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Midst (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; Mi &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;" class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Sueno&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt; (2)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The news we received yesterday about the injury to &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mi &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Sueno&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; was pretty sad. Not only did she have a big chance in the Breeders' Cup but she also might have turned into a very good horse. Now her entire career is in jeopardy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Hot Dixie Chick&lt;/span&gt; is most likely not going to be attending the Breeders' Cup party this race may seem like a consolation prize of sorts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Beautician&lt;/span&gt; is still my #1 selection, I expect her to face off with &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;She Be Wild&lt;/span&gt; in the Alcibiades. That ought to be an exciting contest. I think Beautician has been the better horse to date but the pint sized over achiever from Chicago can't be taken too lightly. Wayne &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Catalano&lt;/span&gt; is very good with young horses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So is Stanley &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Hough&lt;/span&gt; and I was very impressed with his &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Awesome Maria&lt;/span&gt; in the Matron. She just looks so physically imposing even at this early stage. She's going to be a well built muscular filly. I like that she is able to break well and even keep pace early on in sprints but finishing is really her forte. I think two turns will be a good fit. The one downside to her is the schedule she is currently on. Not many horses these days run in the Matron, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Frizette&lt;/span&gt; and Juvenile Fillies especially when they have to ship cross country. I don't want her to come to the juvenile without a route prep race but most likely if she gets one her cautious trainer won't be inclined to ship her to California. We'll have to wait and see. She's a good horse and she fully deserves to be on this list.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-4631694722549896430?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/4631694722549896430/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=4631694722549896430' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4631694722549896430'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4631694722549896430'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/breeders-cup-top-5_30.html' title='Breeders&apos; Cup Top 5'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-4358490271804136668</id><published>2009-09-29T12:11:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-29T12:58:03.819-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Statistics'/><title type='text'>Defending Champions</title><content type='html'>I'm really looking forward to the Breeders' Cup this year. It's not really that significant since I get really pumped for it every year but this time around I am especially intrigued by the large number of defending champions we have returning to try and capture Breeders' Cup races once again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;, Forever Together, Conduit and Desert Code are all on track to run in the Breeders' Cup again. We actually also have Stardom Bound, Red Rocks, Indian Blessing and maybe Midshipman who have all won Breeders' Cup races but won't be defending champions this fall at Santa Anita.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Breeders' Cup has never had so many stars returning in a single year. Last year we had four (&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Curlin&lt;/span&gt;, Kip &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Deville&lt;/span&gt;, Ginger Punch, Midnight Lute) and that seemed like a big number but six is right over the top.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I decided to take a look back and see how defending champions in the past have fared. Since it's inauguration the Breeders' Cup has had 40 horses return to defend their titles in the same race the following year. Only 6 of them (15%) managed to be successful the second time around.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A flat $2 win bet on each of these entrants would have cost $80 and returned just $44.40 for a -44.5% loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;45% of the defending champions did manage to hit the frame but they did so at an average price of 4.50/1.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You don't get very much value out of them typically. These 40 horses won their Breeders' Cup at an average price of 11/1 but they returned to defend their crowns at an average price of 6.20/1.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Four or five of the six defending champions could wind up being favored but the odds say that only one of them is likely to win. Which one would you pick if you had to choose only one?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think I'd have to go with &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-4358490271804136668?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/4358490271804136668/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=4358490271804136668' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4358490271804136668'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/4358490271804136668'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/defending-champions.html' title='Defending Champions'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-7227592970657315460</id><published>2009-09-29T07:20:00.006-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-29T12:59:29.584-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Commentary'/><title type='text'>Grade One Probables</title><content type='html'>These next three weeks are almost like the equivalent of the playoffs in other sports. We recognize that it's not quite the championship yet but the next few weeks will shape and define the championships. A horse's last prep before the Breeders' Cup is a big deal. Hold Me Back already flubbed his last prep and is now being put away for the year. I'm always intrigued by the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;matchup's&lt;/span&gt; in the prep races. It can be tough task finding out who might be facing who. Below is my best guess on the probable entrants for the 23 G-1 events being run over the next three weeks. Some of this is conjecture but most of it was gleaned from various articles. Hopefully some of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;matchup's&lt;/span&gt; on this list get you excited!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Vosburgh&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - Fabulous Strike, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Ready's&lt;/span&gt; Echo, Go Go Shoot&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flower Bowl&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Dynaforce&lt;/span&gt;, Caribbean Sunset, Criticism, Pure Clan, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Lemonette&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Leamington&lt;/span&gt;. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Moneycantbuymelove&lt;/span&gt;, Queen of Hearts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Beldame&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - Icon Project, Music Note, Swift Temper, Unbridled Belle, Captain's Lover, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Briecat&lt;/span&gt;, Copper State, Morena&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Joe Hirsch Turf Classic&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Presious&lt;/span&gt; Passion, Grand Couturier, Telling, Al &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Khali&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jockey Club Gold Cup&lt;/span&gt; - Summer Bird, Quality Road, Asiatic Boy, Dry Martini, Macho Again, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Tizway&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Sette&lt;/span&gt; E Mezzo&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Alcibiades&lt;/span&gt; - She Be Wild, Beautician, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Worstcasescenario&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Breeders' Futurity&lt;/span&gt; - Aspire, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Aikenite&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oak Leaf&lt;/span&gt; - Blind Luck, Always a Princess, Pure Class, Softly Singing, La &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Nez&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Norfolk&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky, Dave in Dixie, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt;, John Scott, Court Mischief, Jung Man Scott, Smiling Tiger&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Frizette&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - Hot Dixie Chick, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Worstcasescenario&lt;/span&gt;, Awesome Maria&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Champagne&lt;/span&gt; - Dublin, Gun Rock, Condemned, Not Macho Any More&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jamaica&lt;/span&gt; - Courageous Cat, Take the Points&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First Lady&lt;/span&gt; - Forever Together, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Tizaqueena&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Shadwell&lt;/span&gt; Turf Mile&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt;, Mr. Sidney&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Spinster&lt;/span&gt; - Indescribable, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Mushka&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lady's Secret&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;, Cocoa Beach, Life Is Sweet, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;Anabaa's&lt;/span&gt; Creation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clement L Hirsch&lt;/span&gt; - Spring House, Sir Dave, Artiste Royal&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ancient Title&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;Gayego&lt;/span&gt;, Cost of Freedom, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Talkin&lt;/span&gt; to Mom &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;Roo&lt;/span&gt;, Atta Boy Roy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yellow Ribbon&lt;/span&gt; - Magical Fantasy, Black Mamba, Life Is Sweet, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;Internallyflawless&lt;/span&gt;, Gotta Have Her&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35"&gt;Goodwood&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;Tiago&lt;/span&gt;, Mine That Bird, Richard's Kid, Parading, Colonel John, Chocolate Candy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Queen Elizabeth II Challenge Cup&lt;/span&gt; - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl, Miss World, Hot &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38"&gt;Cha&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39"&gt;Cha&lt;/span&gt;, Shared Account, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40"&gt;Keertana&lt;/span&gt;, Lady Shakespeare&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;E.P. Taylor&lt;/span&gt; - Princess &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41"&gt;Haya&lt;/span&gt;, Much Obliged, Points of Grace, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42"&gt;Rutherienne&lt;/span&gt;, Salve &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43"&gt;Germania&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Canadian International&lt;/span&gt; - Marsh Side, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44"&gt;Marchfield&lt;/span&gt;, Champs &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45"&gt;Elysees&lt;/span&gt;, Ask, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_46"&gt;Sariska&lt;/span&gt;, Just As Well, Casual Conquest, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_47"&gt;Buccelletti&lt;/span&gt;, Jukebox Jury&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-7227592970657315460?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/7227592970657315460/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=7227592970657315460' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/7227592970657315460'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/7227592970657315460'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/grade-one-probables.html' title='Grade One Probables'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-3749791202045433724</id><published>2009-09-28T10:23:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-28T11:13:50.475-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Review'/><title type='text'>Weekend Review</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Overview:&lt;/span&gt; It was a pretty quiet weekend. The Kentucky Cup series looked like it could have been a good preparation for Breeders' Cup hopefuls but as the synthetic cloud settled it was pretty clear that no potential Breeders' Cup winners were in action. Indescribable ran a decent race against poor competition but it was not a Ladies Classic caliber performance. Same with the Canadian colt El &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Brujo&lt;/span&gt; who took the KY Cup Sprint. Fatal Bullet was a Canadian based sprinter who followed the same path and was second in the Breeders' Cup but El &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Brujo&lt;/span&gt; seems about 7 lengths inferior to where Fatal Bullet was last year. Hold Me Back was all the rage in the Classic but he never lifted a hoof in 6&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; place. Furthest Land and Dubious Miss both ran excellent races but it's hard to see connections pushing onto the Classic with horses that had only previously attempted Graded Stakes company once. It was a good race but they'd both likely fit in better at the upcoming &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; meet. Maybe a race like the Fayette. It was Indian Blessing and Sara Louise who really put on a show. The Gallant Bloom was definitely the best race of the weekend.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SP5rQnrVzCCUQ"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Thoroughbred Championship Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Virtually no changes to these rankings because there were really very few Graded Stakes run this weekend. The next two weeks are among the most pivotal of the entire racing season. The contenders should really start to pull away from the pack with big points on the line in multiple Grade 1 events.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SO-kKqPTNhMOQ"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Power Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Indian Blessing was the only major mover in this quiet week. She moved into second in the Female Sprinter division behind Informed Decision. Remember though that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; is only not a part of this division officially because she's been more of a turf horse so far but a win at the Breeders' Cup on the main track will put her back in here and bump Indian Blessing down a bit. Informed Decision and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; have been the best Female Sprinters this year but the defending champion Indian Blessing has been the best of the rest and her campaign has been somewhat unlucky.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=41944"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Performance of the Week/Race of the Week:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I couldn't help but roll these two categories into one. The race of the week was obviously the Gallant Bloom Handicap. Indian Blessing's part in the race was also the best performance of the week. It seemed like a bit of an awkward trip for Indian Blessing as she didn't make the early pace and she had to make a somewhat premature move through a hole on the fence in order to avoid getting stuck down there. I thought she was beaten in the last 1/16&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; because she hadn't really opened up and Sara Louise looked to be finishing the stronger. But Indian Blessing had obviously had enough of losing. Three in a row is quite a losing streak for a horse of her quality. The youngster Sara Louise just could not match the tenacity of this two time champion. Indian Blessing has been a real treat to follow throughout her career. I  hope we all realize how rare it is to have a juvenile champion still running so well and so consistently at 4 years of age.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Flop of the Week:&lt;/span&gt; Hold Me Back was a major disappointment in the Kentucky Cup Classic. He has often been a "nearly" type of horse and bettors made him the favorite here because of his second place finish in the Travers. The competition didn't look that great and he was the only horse with real Breeders' Cup aspirations. Those aspirations had to have been choked out by the recycled rubber and wax. He was supposed to like the surface so what went wrong? Maybe he's just not that good. Lucky Island and Songster also looked pretty bad in a minor stakes race at Belmont on Friday. At one time these were killers in the sprint division. Now they're cheap fodder in allowance and listed stakes company.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Tip &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;O'the&lt;/span&gt; Cap:&lt;/span&gt; It was pretty neat to see Gomez sweep the Kentucky Cup Stakes races. When I first noted him riding in the Classic I looked through the card to find out which horse he had probably flown into town to ride. I guess the correct answer is all of them. Those were his only three rides of the day and all of them were well timed moves from off the pace. Furthest Land and El &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Brujo&lt;/span&gt; only just got there and Gomez certainly made a difference with them. $240,820 in purse money and a trio of Graded Stakes wins is a pretty good day at the office.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/weekend-picks-and-analysis_25.html"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;KC Handicapping:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Dubious Miss suffered a narrow defeat to Furthest Land who was astutely selected by the &lt;a href="http://thoroughbredchampions.com/2009/09/25/weekend-picks-and-analysis-77/#comments"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;commentor&lt;/span&gt; Eric&lt;/a&gt;. Apparently Furthest Land had the best breeding for this race. He also happened to be well respected in my own Speed Ratings. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;KSR&lt;/span&gt; identified 4 horses that were fast enough to win the KY Cup Classic. They ran 1, 2, 3 and 6 sweeping a $557 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;trifecta&lt;/span&gt; and a $69 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;exacta&lt;/span&gt;. Unfortunately I only focused on Dubious Miss, who I considered to be the strongest of the alternatives to the favorite. But Furthest Land and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Sligovitz&lt;/span&gt; would have been good to throw on the ticket as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Weekly Record: 1(1)-0-1-0 (-$2.00 -100.00% ROI)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Overall Record: 804(456)-138-127-102 (-$174.50 -10.85% ROI)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-3749791202045433724?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/3749791202045433724/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=3749791202045433724' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/3749791202045433724'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/3749791202045433724'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/weekend-review_28.html' title='Weekend Review'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-8692836573768327938</id><published>2009-09-25T10:20:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-25T11:27:02.079-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Handicapping'/><title type='text'>Weekend Picks And Analysis</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Kentucky Cup Classic&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the only stakes race of note that caught my eye this weekend. It's being billed as the perfect prep to get Hold Me Back to the Classic. I think it is a pretty decent spot for him and he's also the best horse in the race. But I do think it might be worth opposing him because it's his first try against older horses and he seems to need a bit of pace to run at. There are a few horses in this race that could set the pace but none of them are real &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;speed balls&lt;/span&gt; and this could be a more tactical affair. I'm going to lean towards Dubious Miss because I think he is the best of the early pace/stalkers. Dubious Miss, like Hold Me Back, has a decent record on synthetics but has spent most of his career running on different surfaces. He &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;gets&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Borel&lt;/span&gt; back in the saddle and interestingly enough he's 5 for 5 with &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Borel&lt;/span&gt; and 1 for 8 with everyone else. Whatever Calvin says to him in the warm up it seems to do the trick. Last time out he sat behind a ridiculously slow pace and could not get to the winner but he did run a very good race. I hope he improves with a slightly better pace scenario and hopefully he has enough to hold off Hold Me Back in the final furlong.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dubious Miss&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-8692836573768327938?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/8692836573768327938/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=8692836573768327938' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8692836573768327938'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/8692836573768327938'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/weekend-picks-and-analysis_25.html' title='Weekend Picks And Analysis'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-9185576364412688413</id><published>2009-09-24T07:53:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-24T08:51:44.206-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Commentary'/><title type='text'>Just Enough Pedigree</title><content type='html'>It's not often that a comment inspires a post on this blog but that's mostly because only a few people leave comments. This particular comment was left at the &lt;a href="http://thoroughbredchampions.com/"&gt;Thoroughbred Champions&lt;/a&gt; homepage where this blog is also published.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is what Eric had to say in response to some negative comments I made about &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt; and his chances in the Breeders' Cup Mile.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"When I love a horse as much as Gone Astray or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt;, it is because of 1 reason. The absolute best bloodlines that the game has to offer. Inside information and smuggler gives me reason to believe that Gone Astray may be unbeatable when the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;phipps&lt;/span&gt; strike with him. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;pensylvania&lt;/span&gt; derby 10 length win was the first step and I believe Gone Astray will prove it once again if entered in the BC. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt; stems from a mare that made Kittens joy, precious kitten, and Dreaming of Anna. These names are special to say the least. Now &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Kiaran&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;mclaughlin&lt;/span&gt; has his chance with this golden breeding and I am willing to give a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;gaurantee&lt;/span&gt; about &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt; in a game where guarantees are hard to give. We shall see."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Eric&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have nothing against the breeding side of the game but I do feel that breeding is misleading when it comes to specific races.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A primary focus on breeding is not precise enough for me. Yes it's true that Gone Astray is regally bred. I'm not a breeding guy and I can easily see that but betting on him to fulfill that promise has been a losing venture.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sure he ran huge in the Pennsylvania Derby but that was his 6&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; career route race and his first win in a non sprint event. Even if you cashed in Pennsylvania you lost overall while betting him in routes because he only paid $11.40. So right now you'd be down $0.60.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For me breeding is a good indicator of a horses possible overall potential. It can also give clues regarding a horses surface and distance preferences but I just can't make a case for it to be the bedrock of my handicapping.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are just too many well bred horses losing races that their bloodlines claim they should win. In can see why others differ in their approach though. They are looking at the specific career of a single horse whereas I'm focusing on one particular moment in time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt; is a good horse and I think he'll win his fair share of races but I view the Breeders' Cup Mile as a race for specialists and he's not a Mile specialist. It seems to me that 9f is actually his best distance. Unless he shows me something different in an 8f race I'm not going to be backing him for the win in the Breeders' Cup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many will really disagree with me but I am always going to defer my opinion of a horse to what they've done on the track as opposed to what their bloodlines claim they could be.  To me bloodlines are just one piece of the puzzle and that piece becomes less significant as their career unfolds and they show what they can actually do. Fathers are often many things that their sons aren't and vice &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;versa&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-9185576364412688413?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/9185576364412688413/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=9185576364412688413' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/9185576364412688413'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/9185576364412688413'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/just-enough-pedigree.html' title='Just Enough Pedigree'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-7388205836530893493</id><published>2009-09-23T07:28:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-23T08:54:13.017-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Top 10 2009'/><title type='text'>Breeders' Cup Top 5</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;September 23rd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Classic&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Rail Trip (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Rip Van Winkle (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt; (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. Einstein (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Parading (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No change to my Classic rankings this week although there could be some movement after this weekend. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Rip Van Winkle&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Mastercraftsman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; could be in action at Ascot this weekend and of course that result could impact both their Classic ranking and even which Breeders' Cup race they're pointed at. Rip Van Winkle is the scariest horse right now, he just got good before his minor injury. If he come back in the same or better form he might find himself the top ranked horse in the Classic division.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Hold Me Back&lt;/span&gt; also runs in the Kentucky Cup Classic this weekend and a good performance from him puts him right in the mix. He and Summer Bird are already knocking on the door just below Parading so any flash of brilliance would be enough to see him upgraded. I like his closing style and also the fact that he's been so effective on synthetic surfaces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Turf&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Fame And Glory (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. Conduit (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. Spanish Moon (new)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Kite Wood (5)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; Tartan Bearer (3)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Tartan Bearer&lt;/span&gt; has unfortunately come up injured and will not be contesting the Breeders' Cup. it's a shame because he would have had a big impact.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I still see &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Fame And Glory&lt;/span&gt; as far and away the best horse in this group. I only hope his connections still want to bring him after the Arc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Kite Wood&lt;/span&gt; may have lost the St. Leger to his stablemate Mastery but I think the Turf is still a great fit for him. I got the impression that the 14f St. Leger was a bit too far for him. I think he's the best 12f Turf horse that the boys in blue have got and he should be given his chance in America.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Spanish Moon&lt;/span&gt; is a very interesting horse. He is a very talented son of El Prado but he's had some mental problems with regards to the gate. He was actually barred from racing in England over the summer because of his antics. But no matter he has used that time to go undefeated in France. Why is he now ranked so high? The suspension in England has actually helped him because it means he's been trained like a French horse instead of an English one. Most English horses are primed for a big summer. Royal Ascot in June, then the Eclipse, King George, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Juddmonte&lt;/span&gt; International and Irish Champion stakes in September comprise the bulk of the season for top flight horses. Consequently a lot of English horses are out of gas by the fall. French horses by contrast are aimed at the Fall. That's why Andre &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Fabre&lt;/span&gt; has such a great record in the Arc and Breeders' Cup. Back to Spanish Moon, he hasn't had any races between June and mid September. I think he'll have a big fall. He's been first or second in all of his last 6 races and his one experience on a North American-like track was a positive one. He lost by just a nose in the Dubai &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Sheema&lt;/span&gt; Classic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A horse I won't touch for this race is &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Just As Well&lt;/span&gt;. I know he earned a G-1 win last weekend but the form of that race was pretty poor. He's a bet against if he shows up because he's not in the same class as even &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt;, let alone the top Europeans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Mile&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt; (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Delegator&lt;/span&gt; (3)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Ghanaati&lt;/span&gt; (4)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Aqlaam&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Ferneley&lt;/span&gt; (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt; (2), &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who is the best miler in North America? My feeling is that it's &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Gio&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Ponti&lt;/span&gt; followed closely by &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;. Who is the best miler in North America that is pointing to the BC Mile? That's a much tougher question to answer. I'm not necessarily sold on the fact that a European has to win the Mile this year but I'm honestly having trouble coming up with the name of a local that's good enough to beat them. The Woodbine Mile was a bit of a dream crusher in that regard. I thought &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt; would run well enough to convince his connections to go. I thought the same for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney but both failed the test and both will now go down different paths that don't include a stop at Santa Anita.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So who is left? Some people will really get behind &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Justenuffhumor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;. I am not on that boat at all. He would have to be extremely impressive in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Kelso&lt;/span&gt; or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; Mile to change my mind. If he just wins like he has been doing I won't be using him.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The European &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Aqlaam&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; has made the list as a temporary stop gap. I'm not sure if he's coming. I do know that he's a solid horse and he'll do until other contenders emerge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've tossed &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Ferneley&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; on the list despite the fact that he's not nominated because at least he's shown that on occasion he can run a big race that puts him in the hunt against top class milers. I know that's a thin case but it's all I've got at present. Besides &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Ventura's&lt;/span&gt; 108 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;BSF&lt;/span&gt; for winning the Woodbine Mile &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;Ferneley&lt;/span&gt; owns the two highest 8f Turf &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;BSF's&lt;/span&gt; this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This race is crying out for some real North American contenders to be born in the Oak Tree Mile, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;Kelso&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; Mile. Keep a close eye on those races.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sprint&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Fatal Bullet (1)&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; (2)&lt;br /&gt;3. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;Munnings&lt;/span&gt; (3)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;Ready's&lt;/span&gt; Echo (4)&lt;br /&gt;5. Noble Court (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; Jungle Wave (5)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Fatal Bullet&lt;/span&gt; is back on track and working and I expect my confidence to grow on him in the next month. He's just as much a monster as &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35"&gt;Zensational&lt;/span&gt; on the synthetics but he gets far less press. Connections might choose to send him to the Ancient Title as a last prep which would drive down his price for the Sprint but it would be a good indicator of his real talent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Poor &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Jungle Wave&lt;/span&gt; ran his heart out in the Woodbine Mile and if he were my horse I'd definitely be looking at the Sprint. But the people that actually own him seem to be leaning elsewhere with him. If they change their minds I'm on board but until then I have to drop him.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Noble Court&lt;/span&gt; is not good enough to win the Sprint unless there is a monumental pace meltdown but I do think he is the second best sprinter in California at the moment. That should count for something.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's hard to see past the top two, everyone else looks like a second rate choice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Juvenile&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky (2)&lt;br /&gt;2. Dublin (3)&lt;br /&gt;3. Aspire (4)&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;Pulsion&lt;/span&gt; (5)&lt;br /&gt;5. Dave in Dixie (new)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dropped:&lt;/span&gt; Sidney's Candy (1)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just one week into the rankings for the Juvenile and I've already lost my #1. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Sidney's Candy&lt;/span&gt; has unfortunately come up with a minor injury that will keep him out of the Juvenile. He ought to be back for the Hollywood meet so look for him in the Futurity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a result of that defection &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38"&gt;Lookin&lt;/span&gt; At Lucky&lt;/span&gt; takes over as the top horse. I'm fairly confident that he could be beaten but his competition is pretty under developed at this stage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've decided not to include either &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39"&gt;D'Funnybone&lt;/span&gt; or Discreetly Mine off of their performances in the Futurity. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40"&gt;D'Funnybone's&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; owner and trainer need to sit down and have a talk because Paul &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41"&gt;Pompa&lt;/span&gt; is saying that the Juvenile is next for him while &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42"&gt;Dutrow&lt;/span&gt; is saying that he's like to take the Champagne then wrap him up for the year. Neither scenario makes him a good pick in my opinion. I hate runners that come directly from the Futurity (or Matron) directly to the Breeders' Cup. The only time I give them a serious look is when the BC is at Belmont because of the one turn configuration. I just think that the 7f Futurity is not a good final prep for the Juvenile and horses with two turn experience generally always dominate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Discreetly Mine&lt;/span&gt; looks like a good horse but will his connections given him another prep then ship all the way out west? Stanley &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43"&gt;Hough&lt;/span&gt; seems a bit more reticent than that to me and ultimately I think we'll see him in a race like the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44"&gt;Remsen&lt;/span&gt; instead of the Juvenile.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've added &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dave in Dixie&lt;/span&gt; because he is more or less the kind of horse I'm looking for. He was an impressive winner from John &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45"&gt;Sadler's&lt;/span&gt; barn at Del Mar. He is based in California so it's not a big stretch to see him tossed into the mix even if he is not the most accomplished. The synthetic track experience coupled with a bit of talent is what I'm really looking for.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-7388205836530893493?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/7388205836530893493/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=7388205836530893493' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/7388205836530893493'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/7388205836530893493'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/breeders-cup-top-5_23.html' title='Breeders&apos; Cup Top 5'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-7899265740134567548</id><published>2009-09-21T11:52:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-21T12:43:49.654-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Review'/><title type='text'>Weekend Review</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Overview:&lt;/span&gt; I thought this weekend was highlighted by the magic of knowing your horse. Bobby Frankel brought &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; to Woodbine because there was a big purse being offered for a race that fit her preferences perfectly. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; is a one turn specialist and she flaunted her proficiency once again. Forever Together also came to Woodbine but she's the polar opposite of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;, she is definitely a two turn horse. Forever Together has never lost a two turn turf race but she's struggled mightily in one turn races. That struggle showed itself again as she was nosed out by the inferior Princess &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Haya&lt;/span&gt;. Don't worry too much about the reigning Female Turf champ. The division is won or lost in two turn events and she'll still have a couple of those left on her dance card this season. Regal Ransom looked good in the Super Derby but he's still a few notches short of the real cream from this crop. Blame on the other hand had the pace against him but still came with a bold run in the final few furlongs. His star seems to be on the rise. I wouldn't make too much out of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;D'Funnybone's&lt;/span&gt; latest runaway victory. I thought Discreetly Mine was equally impressive after having a rough trip. With &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Dutrow&lt;/span&gt; planning to take &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;D'Funnybone&lt;/span&gt; straight to the Juvenile off this 7f effort he's an easy toss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SP5rQnrVzCCUQ"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Thoroughbred Championship Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Just As Well got lucky when he inherited a win via &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;DQ&lt;/span&gt;. He wasn't affected by the trouble but he did get most of the benefit. That result has propelled him into a firm second place in the Turf Male rankings and 6&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; overall! Who would have ever thought that Just As Well would be ranked higher than Forever Together?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pK74cTgFt4SO-kKqPTNhMOQ"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Power Rankings:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; has gone from the head of one division to the head of another. The way Power Rankings work is that a horse is given a score based on their entire body of work but the division they get placed in is based on what kind of races make up the bulk of their score. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; had been the top Female Sprinter until this weekend when she captured a massive prize on the grass. That made her more of a grass horse than main track sprinter this season so she moved divisions. Expect her to flip flop back into contention for the top Female Sprinter after the Breeders' Cup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=41842"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Performance of the Week:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; was really good but the pace really helped her as well. She would certainly be a deserving choice for performance of the week but she's also &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;every one's&lt;/span&gt; top choice. I'm going to go against the grain just a bit and say that I was personally quite impressed with Awesome Maria in the Matron. She sat right on the pace which was lively then looked powerful as she just extended away from the field. I'm pretty convinced that she'll go two turns and she's a pretty nice physical specimen for a 2yo filly as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.ntra.com/video.aspx?id=41838"&gt;Race of the Week:&lt;/a&gt; Surely the 2009 renewal of the Noble Damsel has to go down in history as one of the tightest non dead-heat finishes of all time. Check out the &lt;a href="http://www.nyra.com/PhotoFinishAction.do?action=viewImage&amp;amp;trackId=BEL&amp;amp;raceDate=2009-09-19&amp;amp;raceNumber=4&amp;amp;position=1"&gt;photo&lt;/a&gt;. What is that winning margin, like 3 millimeters? To the naked eye &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Rutherienne&lt;/span&gt; never had her nose in front, even her jockey Alan Garcia congratulated the rider of Quiet Meadow for winning. It just goes to show how important photo finish cameras are. A few weeks ago someone expressed surprise when I said that all dead heats awarded prior to the era of finish line camera's were suspect in my mind. This is why. Even an experienced eye could not have seen &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Rutherienne&lt;/span&gt; get in front at the line.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Flop of the Week:&lt;/span&gt; I thought &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt; was ridden far too close to the pace to be effective at Woodbine. Obviously his connections feared &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney more than they should have. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt; was ridden from further back in the Met Mile, Cigar Mile and even the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt; allowance and he did just fine in those races. Here he struggled home without any real kick at all in the lane. He still managed to run 4&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; just a nose out of third but my feeling is that with some better tactics he could been flying home right with &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;. Badly done by Alan Garcia.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Tip &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;O'the&lt;/span&gt; Cap:&lt;/span&gt; 2007 Arlington Million winner Jambalaya was back in action for the first time since that victory and he picked up right where he left off! Okay maybe he wasn't quite back to that level but he did manage to win and he looked pretty good while doing it. Woodbine was never even his favorite course. He always seemed to do better away from his home track but it's great to see him back in action. Who knows, this 7 year old gelding may actually be a major contender for some of this seasons big Turf stakes. He is 19-9-1-6 in his career on the grass but he's 5-4-0-1 away from Woodbine. He's won G-1's at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Gulfstream&lt;/span&gt; and Arlington and a graded stakes at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt;. Jambalaya is a serious horse and congratulations to his connections for getting him back to the races. Patience rewarded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/weekend-picks-and-analysis_18.html"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;KC Handicapping:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I missed the mark pretty badly this week. For a moment it seemed as if &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Quijano&lt;/span&gt; was going to be good enough but he just doesn't have enough punch in the lane. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney was too close to a fast pace and he just wasn't good enough. It's been a rough little streak for my 20-20 profiles. Losses in the Woodbine Mile, Pacific Classic and Whitney are beginning to add up. All the 20-20 profiles combined are just $0.70 profitable this year nailing only 6 winners from 11 races. The overall overage is 195% ROI and 79% winners. The Breeders' Cup (eight established races) and Canadian International are the only races of the year left with a developed profile.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Weekly Record: 3(2)-0-1-0 (-$6.00 -100.00% ROI)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Overall Record: 803(455)-138-126-102 (-$172.50 -10.74% ROI)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-7899265740134567548?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/7899265740134567548/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=7899265740134567548' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/7899265740134567548'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/7899265740134567548'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/weekend-review_21.html' title='Weekend Review'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-38199193572354423</id><published>2009-09-18T11:32:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-10-02T14:25:08.582-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Kennedy Speed Ratings'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Handicapping'/><title type='text'>Weekend Picks And Analysis</title><content type='html'>I've calculated the Kennedy Speed Ratings (&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;KSR&lt;/span&gt;) for each applicable race at Woodbine on Sunday. Unfortunately I could not find the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;BRISnet&lt;/span&gt; data for races 3, 10 and 11 so those have been left out. For anyone not familiar with these ratings the essential premise is that any horse rated 100 or higher is fast enough to win, the others are not. This system is still in it's infancy so posts like these are really more like tests rather than statements of confidence. Still perhaps a few of you will find it interesting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;iframe width='500' height='300' frameborder='0' src='http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tBETdFP2024ipVw8fEuH_Sw&amp;single=true&amp;gid=5&amp;output=html&amp;widget=true'&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Northern Dancer Stakes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's a pretty even race with many logical ways to go. I've ended up with &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Marchfield&lt;/span&gt; in this race. I think he's in excellent current form and 12f on the grass is just perfect for him. Having watched all of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Marchfields&lt;/span&gt; races this year he just seems like a horse that is coming up to a boiling point. All his races are looking better and better and it has generally been coinciding with him having longer races. It's hard to believe that his connections have given him so few chances on the grass. He won a leg of the Canadian Triple Crown at 12f in his turf debut but still he's only had 6 turf races total. He is 4 for 16 on the main track and 3 for 6 on the grass. He is 4-2-1-0 in races 10f or longer on the grass. It's hard to imagine any of the horses he beat in the Sky Classic coming back to reverse the form. The main threats I see are &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Quijano&lt;/span&gt; and Just As Well. Just as Well is a logical threat but I'm not a huge fan of his first time in Canada and first time at 12f I prefer those with a bit more course and distance experience. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Quijano&lt;/span&gt; fits the bill as one having both course and distance experience. This will be his 4&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; race at Woodbine and he has twice gone close to winning a G-1 here. He fell victim to what I call the "Euro bounce" last time out but he should be better this time. Europeans often run extremely well first time off the plane but fade next time out if they try another North American start right away. I think &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Quijano&lt;/span&gt; will bounce back to his normal form which puts him in the 102 Beyer range. That's good enough to get himself right in the mix here. I still narrowly prefer &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Marchfield&lt;/span&gt; but &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Quijano&lt;/span&gt; has a major chance. There are others with chances as well I just don't like them as much.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Marchfield&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quijano&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Woodbine Mile&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is one of my favorite races of the year. Outside the Breeders' Cup and Kentucky Derby I'm not sure that there's a race I enjoy more. This field is as solid as ever and I think whoever wins this will have to do it with a real top drawer performance. Ian Black, the trainer of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney, has predicted that the stakes record is likely to fall on Sunday. I think I agree with him. This race has some decent pace, excellent stalkers and tremendous closers. Every sectional of this race could be run very quickly. I've enlisted the help of my 20-20 profile system to help parse the contenders from the pretenders. You can view the full rankings below but in a nutshell there are actually 4 perfect qualifiers this year. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney, Jungle Wave and Daylight Express. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; surprisingly is not among the qualifiers. Daylight Express is a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;bonafide&lt;/span&gt; bomb who surprisingly ticks all the right boxes. His speed is an unknown quantity but we can't fault him because of a lack of information. I don't think Barbadian form is quite good enough though so I'm going against him. Jungle Wave is a horse I'm becoming increasingly partial to but a mile is not his best distance. Connections really should be sticking to sprints with him. That leaves me to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt;. Both are fantastic horses and both could easily win the race. I will personally lean towards &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney. I know he had a blowup in his last race but he's a machine at shorter distances and until his last race he's been a real tiger all year long. I think the Sky Classic is just obscuring his real form and he's as good or better than he was last year. He won't be a juicy 12/1 like he was last year but I'll settle for 4/1 on this quality gelding. I still remember watching his father in the inaugural Woodbine Mile. He finished third just a head back of second place behind Geri and Helmsmen. He was never anywhere near as good as &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney is. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt; may be the next mile superstar and if he is we'll just have to cede the race to him but &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Bribon&lt;/span&gt; has been a bit inconsistent in the past and this track is very different from &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt;. It's more like the European tracks that he didn't do as well over. I'm hoping the Canadians can defend themselves here and take home first prize.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Rahy's&lt;/span&gt; Attorney&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;iframe src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tZ-0yzAPQRx2mLcxjPCFWVw&amp;amp;single=true&amp;amp;gid=4&amp;amp;output=html&amp;amp;widget=true" frameborder="0" height="300" width="500"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-38199193572354423?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/38199193572354423/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=38199193572354423' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/38199193572354423'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/38199193572354423'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/weekend-picks-and-analysis_18.html' title='Weekend Picks And Analysis'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35403587.post-6495323046034542919</id><published>2009-09-16T06:58:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-09-16T09:38:35.482-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BC Top 10 2009'/><title type='text'>Breeders' Cup Top 5</title><content type='html'>Last week I gave my thoughts on the &lt;a href="http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/breeders-cup-top-5.html"&gt;male Breeders' Cup&lt;/a&gt; races so this week I thought I'd finish things off by doing the major female races. My plan is to rotate back and form like this each week all the way to the Breeders' Cup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;September 16&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Ladies Classic&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Icon Project&lt;br /&gt;2. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Music Note&lt;br /&gt;4. Careless Jewel&lt;br /&gt;5. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Acoma&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the major Breeders' Cup Female races we have a rather unique situation. Three defending champions (four if you count &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Goldikova&lt;/span&gt;) are coming back and all of them will be expected to win. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; and Forever Together could all be favored in their races but do we really accept the fact that these races will all be won by defending champs at short prices? I had to do a rethink on each race just to get away from that notion because I think it's easy and logical to go with the defending champions in each race but it's not going to happen. The Breeders' Cup talent pool is too deep for that to happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; has never lost a race and she likely won't have lost a race by the time the Breeders' Cup rolls around. I have always thought that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Zenyatta's&lt;/span&gt; weakness would be trying to run down top quality stalkers if the pace was not really quick. Coming from the back of the pack as she does that's always a risk and she's had a few close calls. I have her second in this group because I think her number will finally get called this fall and her unbeaten record will be sullied.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think the filly to finally tame the wild Amazon will be Icon Project. She's a big powerful filly in her own right and she is in otherworldly form this year. As a daughter of Empire Maker she was never likely to be that choosy about surfaces. She has done reasonably well on the grass and originally it looked like her connections wanted to keep her on the turf. After all at one point she actually finished within 3/4 of a length of Dar Re Mi who is one of the finest turf fillies anywhere. But when the New York Handicap was washed off the grass a new career was born and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;Woflson&lt;/span&gt; found out that Icon Project was unbelievable on the main track. Three races on the dirt and she's earned nice Beyer's each time. Her only loss was because of a tactical blunder on a speed favoring track. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;Valdivia&lt;/span&gt; let Swift Temper get everything her own way at Delaware and it was far too late by the time she got going. It cost him the mount. Her Personal Ensign victory was reminiscent of another Phipps horse, Inside Information. Icon Project is a star on the rise and I think she'll love synthetics. She is a big tough filly capable of brilliance and she has the tactical advantage on &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;Zenyatta&lt;/span&gt;. She's my #1.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Music Note&lt;/span&gt; looked horrendous in her first start back as a 4yo but she laid the fears about not training on to rest in the Ballerina. She was dominant over Indian Blessing and Informed Decision who will both be main contenders in the Filly and Mare Sprint. Connections might be tempted to keep her at 7f but I think she's going to stretch out. I expect to see her in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;Beldame&lt;/span&gt; alongside stablemate Seventh Street. I think she's the far better filly of the two and with her Santa Anita form already set from last year she is the more logical pick for the Ladies classic as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Careless Jewel&lt;/span&gt; has gone from zero to hero in a remarkably short span of time. She was thought to be a pretty good thing by bettors at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; in her debut. Josie Carroll first timers rarely take money at places like &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; but Careless Jewel was made the favorite. I feel back for her backers because that was the only day of her career that she didn't take home the money. She won a couple of races on Woodbine's &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;Polytrack&lt;/span&gt; before setting off to Delaware and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt; where she earned &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;Beyers&lt;/span&gt; of 104 and 106 in dominating stakes performances. We already know that she handles synthetics, now we know that she's a very dangerous speed horse even against stakes types. She could be controlling the pace on Breeders' Cup day and no horse has ever caught her once she's hit the front.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;Acoma&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is something of a pet project of mine for this race. I probably have more faith in her than her connections do but I see all the tools being in place for her. She is another daughter of Empire Maker and have proven to be adept on all three surfaces. Most of her races have come on dirt but oddly enough dirt is the only surface she's ever lost on. She is undefeated on turf and synthetics. I like the quick move she has and some of her dirt form shows that she has the class to compete with the best.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Turf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Dar Re Mi&lt;br /&gt;2. Midday&lt;br /&gt;3. Forever Together&lt;br /&gt;4. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl&lt;br /&gt;5. Pure Clan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is another event where the defending champion will loom large. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Forever Together&lt;/span&gt; has still never lost a two turn Turf race. It's going to be a tough thing for her competition to overcome. But the one thing that has me rating her a bit lower at this stage is the fact that she has not been as dominant this year and that even at the height of her powers she never had to deal with a first class European. Horses like &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;Caribbean&lt;/span&gt; Sunset have challenged her this year and that form does not look great.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Dar Re Mi&lt;/span&gt; is a first class European and might well be on her way to North America. She suffered a somewhat dubious &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_20"&gt;DQ&lt;/span&gt; in her last race but if you consider the result as it should have been, a win for her, then she'd be 4-3-1-0 on the year with three straight G-1 wins. Her only loss came in her debut by a short head. Dar Re Mi has accounted for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_21"&gt;Sariska&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_22"&gt;Stacelita&lt;/span&gt;, the two sophomore fillies that looked like potential superstars. Her win over &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_23"&gt;Stacelita&lt;/span&gt; was taken from her but I'm more concerned about the level of talent she showed to hit the line first. There is no question that she was the better horse. Dar Re Mi handles any ground and is an extremely tough horse. John &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_24"&gt;Gosden&lt;/span&gt; had success shipping to Santa Anita last year and he could as well this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also like the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_25"&gt;Henry&lt;/span&gt; Cecil trained &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Midday&lt;/span&gt;. She has really been coming into her own over the last few months. I think she is better on firm ground although she hasn't had much firm ground of late. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_26"&gt;Juddmonte&lt;/span&gt; farms are normally supporters of the Breeders' Cup so I expect that this filly will be pointed to Santa Anita after perhaps one more race in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_27"&gt;Gozzip&lt;/span&gt; Girl&lt;/span&gt; suffered a pretty bad reverse in the Garden City stakes this past weekend but I still believe that she has the talent to be competitive here. Being steadied repeatedly then nearly going down on the first turn is enough of an excuse for me. I also think that ultimately her best races will be run on firm ground. Watch for her in her form recovery mission in either the Flower Bowl or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_28"&gt;QE&lt;/span&gt; II at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_29"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt;. I'd much prefer the Flower Bowl as a prep because I think the timing is far better but the lure of facing only fillies her own age may be too great.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems like &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Pure Clan's&lt;/span&gt; season hasn't really gotten off the ground yet but she's still a good horse. She might require a bit of pace to be effective but it's not unreasonable to think that she could get a pace on Breeders' Cup day. I think the Female turf routers in North America are kind of weak this year aside from Forever Together. She's as likely as anyone to get a piece.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Filly and Mare Sprint&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_30"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Informed Decision&lt;br /&gt;3. Carlsbad&lt;br /&gt;4. Indian Blessing&lt;br /&gt;5. Game Face&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look at this race and I can't help but choke on a bit of chalk dust. None of my top 5 fillies would be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_31"&gt;longshots&lt;/span&gt; but even still I felt like I was really reaching to come up with 5 horses for this race. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Indian Blessing&lt;/span&gt; has been an admirable horse for years now but 7f and synthetics have never been her best game. It's hard to envision a scenario where she beats last year's winner &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_32"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Game Face&lt;/span&gt; ran a good race at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_33"&gt;Presque&lt;/span&gt; Isle and that should be enough to book her Santa Anita ticket but can she really beat Informed Decision who has handled her so easily twice? It's a real stretch but Game Face is still one that could hit the frame.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Carlsbad&lt;/span&gt; is a legitimate threat to the big two in this race because she is the speed of the speed. I think she can out foot Indian Blessing and she can certainly run big races when she gets in front. She is not yet nominated but I think connections will want to take that shot with her. She's a win machine and she deserves a chance to compete with the best at her best distance and surface.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_34"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt; over Informed Decision but it's a really close call. Not much separated them at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_35"&gt;Keeneland&lt;/span&gt; when they met and there will likely be little to find at Santa Anita for the rematch. What I like about &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_36"&gt;Ventura&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is actually her lighter campaign. Frankel has been very choosy with her this year and she's likely to run in the Woodbine mile then go straight to Santa Anita to prepare for the Sprint. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Informed Decision&lt;/span&gt; has not exactly been running every other weekend but she has had significantly more racing over the summer and may not be quite as fresh. She is also not a Californian and that might play into it. In the past I thought Informed Decision had the advantage because of her tactical speed but I think those other factors outweigh the tactical speed issue. This should be a hotly contested race and a great event to watch.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Juvenile Fillies&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Beautician&lt;br /&gt;2. Mi &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_37"&gt;Sueno&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. She Be Wild&lt;br /&gt;4. Blind Luck&lt;br /&gt;5. Midst&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyone that sees this race clearly is encouraged to drop me a line. I certainly had a very difficult time figuring out who to put on top. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Mi &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_38"&gt;Sueno&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is the logical choice. She's regally bred, based in California and is now a multiple stakes winner. But something about her has me less than convinced. She's not that fast at present and I do wonder if the best fillies are out West. It is a good sign that she's winning without having totally figured it out yet. Her trainer must have had quite a scare last time as she looked beaten in the stretch but it turns out that she just hadn't decided to run yet. Once she picked it up she was able to score a bit easily but stunts like that have to be corrected. Good horses won't give you multiple chances to catch them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Hot Dixie Chick&lt;/span&gt; looks like a glaring omission but I consider her highly unlikely to participate. The Jackson/&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_39"&gt;Asmussen&lt;/span&gt; team are not going to send many horses to California. They have already made noises about just running her in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_40"&gt;Frizette&lt;/span&gt; if anywhere else at all. In her absence I decided to go with &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Beautician&lt;/span&gt; as my #1. There is something &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_41"&gt;Ashado&lt;/span&gt;-&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_42"&gt;esque&lt;/span&gt; about this filly as a juvenile. She had a sparkling maiden then got crushed by Hot Dixie Chick. The rematch had the same result but I thought that Beautician looked much better than she had in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_43"&gt;Schuylerville&lt;/span&gt;. She doesn't have the same quick move as the Dixie Chick but she chased her hard all the way to the line without being asked all that hard. It looked to me like a great stepping stone to a two turn race. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_44"&gt;McPeek&lt;/span&gt; is good with juveniles and you can almost guarantee that she'll go on synthetics next in &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_45"&gt;Keeneland's&lt;/span&gt; Alcibiades. I think Beautician has a big future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;She Be Wild&lt;/span&gt; is a pint size conundrum from the Mid-West. Trained by Wayne &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_46"&gt;Catalano&lt;/span&gt; she has done nothing wrong and has been extremely impressive. But is she that fast? How good was her competition? With talk of her training up to the Juvenile Fillies will she be a good bet without any two turn experience. It's too early to answer all of those questions. For now we simply respect what she's shown.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Blind Luck&lt;/span&gt; is a filly trained by Jerry &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_47"&gt;Hollendorfer&lt;/span&gt; who looked fantastic in her debut then followed that up with a clunk up second behind Mi &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_48"&gt;Sueno&lt;/span&gt; at Del Mar. Her second race was not nearly as good as her first but horses often regress off a big maiden score. To finish that closely to Mi &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_49"&gt;Sueno&lt;/span&gt; while looking less than spectacular is a notable feat and if she continues to improve she should be a main contender in the Oak Leaf and Juvenile Fillies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Midst&lt;/span&gt; is a Canadian based horse that I've been waiting on for a while. She earned a 90 Beyer in June at Woodbine but hasn't made it to the track since. That was a huge figure for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_50"&gt;Polytrack&lt;/span&gt; at that time of year. She was sent to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_51"&gt;Saratoga&lt;/span&gt; but never got in a start there so there could be some fitness issues. I'm excited about her as a talent though and she still has plenty of time to get another start in before the Breeders' Cup.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/35403587-6495323046034542919?l=kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/feeds/6495323046034542919/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35403587&amp;postID=6495323046034542919' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/6495323046034542919'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/35403587/posts/default/6495323046034542919'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://kennedyscorridor.blogspot.com/2009/09/breeders-cup-top-5_16.html' title='Breeders&apos; Cup Top 5'/><author><name>Kennedy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14149130617213590448</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07303507561778993455'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></entry></feed>